For more information or to

schedule an interview, contact

Naren Daniel at:
(646) 292-8381 or
naren.daniel@nyu.edu.

Florida Fact Sheet:

What Caused the Crime Decline?
By Lauren-Brooke Eisen, Julia Bowling*
A new Brennan Center report, entitled What Caused the Crime Decline?, examines 14 different theories
for the massive decline in crime across the country over the last two decades. It provides a rigorous
empirical analysis conducted by a team of economics and criminal justice researchers on over 40
years of data, gathered from all 50 states and the 50 largest cities.
New Report Findings
Over the past 40 years, states across the country have sought to fight crime by implementing policies
to increase incarceration. The result: The United States is now the largest jailor in the world. With 5
percent of the worlds population, we have 25 percent of its prisoners.
In Florida, the incarceration rate was 38 percent higher than the national average by 2010. After
Florida passed truth in sentencing legislation in 1995, most state prisoners must serve a minimum
of 85 percent of their sentences before release. The states three strikes legislation and mandatory
minimum sentences for crimes involving firearms also contributed to the increase in its number of
prisoners to 103,028 by 2013. Florida spent $2.316 billion a year on corrections in 2013.
At the same time, crime in Florida dropped from its height in 1988 to 2013 by 60 percent. And the
national crime rate was cut in half.
What caused this drop? Was it the explosion in incarceration? Or was it something else?
The reports central findings:

Increased incarceration had a limited effect on reducing crime for the last two
decades: Increased incarceration had some effect, likely somewhere around 0-10 percent,
on reducing crime from 1990 to 2000. Since 2000, however, increased incarceration had an
almost zero effect on crime. Further, a number of states -- California, Michigan, New Jersey,
New York, and Texas -- have successfully reduced imprisonment while crime continued to
fall.
Other factors reduced crime: Increased numbers of police officers, some data-driven
policing techniques, changes in income, decreased alcohol consumption, and an aging

* Lauren-Brooke Eisen is Counsel and Julia Bowling is Research Associate at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. They
are co-authors of What Caused the Crime Decline?

population played a role in reducing crime. In particular, this report finds that the policing
technique known as CompStat is associated with a 5 to 15 percent decrease in crime. A
review of past research indicates that consumer confidence and inflation also likely
contributed to crime reduction.
Incarceration & Crime in Florida
As illustrated in Figure 1, Florida imprisoned 527 people per 100,000, a higher rate than the U.S. at
large.
Criminal justice reform in Florida has been slow to arrive. In 2012, the legislature passed a law to
reduce mandatory minimums for drug offenders, but it was vetoed by Gov. Rick Scott. In July 2014,
legislation to eliminate mandatory minimums for some low-level drug offenders became law. As the
first state to create a drug court in 1989, Florida continues to expand its use of specialty courts. But
without major reforms, the state continues to suffer from high rates of recidivism, probation
violations, and juveniles graduating to the adult system.
Figure 1: Imprisonment Rates in Florida and the U.S. (1980-2013)

As shown in Figure 2, as incarceration rose from 1980 (when Florida had 20,735 prisoners), the
effectiveness of increased incarceration adding new prisoners steadily declined. By 2002,
imprisonment exceeded 75,000 prisoners, and effectiveness on crime declined to essentially zero.
The marginal effect on crime of adding more people to prisons remains at essentially zero today.
This reports findings support further reforms to reduce Floridas incarcerated population and
show this can be achieved without added crime.

BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE | 2

Figure 2: Effectiveness of Imprisonment on Crime in Florida (1980-2013)

Policing & Crime

One policing approach, CompStat, which instills strong management and data-driven practices,
played a role in bringing down crime in cities where implemented. The introduction of CompStatstyle programs was responsible for a 5 to 15 percent decrease in crime in the 50 largest cities
nationally.
CompStat was widely implemented in American cities starting in the 1990s. In Florida, CompStat
was introduced in Jacksonville and Miami, but implementation dates are unknown.
Little analysis has been conducted on the effectiveness of how police fight crime. CompStat is one of
the most consistent, easily identifiable, and widespread policing techniques employed during the
time period under examination. Although different cities deploy it differently, the general objective is
the same: to implement strong management and accountability within police departments to execute
strategies based in robust data collection to reduce and prevent crime. Additionally, our research
found increased numbers of police officers also played a role in reducing crime.
Conclusion
Public and political pressure to effectively fight crime and improve public safety has been used to
justify incarceration despite the economic and human toll. This report finds that this one-size fits
all use of imprisonment to punish crime has passed the point of diminishing returns. In essence,
adding more and more people to prison is no longer producing the expected crime control benefits.
As state budgets grow tighter, government should invest in policies that achieve their intended goals.
Prioritizing modern, evidence-based criminal justice policies with record of success over costly and
ineffective over-incarceration seems to be the best way forward in Florida and nationwide.
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE | 3