Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
& Bacillus sp. are specific producers of peptidase amongst bacteria and peptidase enzymes and
are of significant ones due to their multifarious applications. Advances in industrial biotechnology
offer potential opportunities for economic utilization of agro-industrial by-products for many biochemical reactions. Due to their rich organic nature, they can serve as an ideal substrate for the
production of different value added products like peptidases. In the present work, an attempt
was made to optimize different variables by Taguchi methodology for the production of peptidase
using agro-industrial by-products hydrolyzed by a Bacillus cereus strain, resulting in brewers
spent grain (BSG) being the optimal organic substrate. Subsequently, operative variables for the
BSG were investigated using Taguchi methodology in order to maximize the enzyme production.
Additionally, the main medium components were optimized using a mixture design. Finally, the
production of peptidase by B. cereus was investigated; also the possible interaction with other proteolytic microbial strains was evaluated. A notorious synergistic effect was observed when B. cereus
was inoculated with Pseudomonas sp. These brought a triple benefit, first, opening the possibility
to produce technical enzymes at low cost, second, giving greater value to a food industry by-product,
and third, reducing the environmental impact caused by the product removal directly into the
environment.
Keywords medium optimization, mixture design, peptidase, statistical designs, taguchi
design
INTRODUCTION
Microbial enzymes are more advantageous than enzymes derived from
plants or animals because of their great variety of catalytic activities,
Address correspondence to Catalina Elena Kotlar, Food Engineer, Grupo de Investigacion en
Ingeniera en Alimentos, Faculty of Engineering, National University of Mar del Plata, Juan B. Justo
4302, Mar del Plata 7600, Argentina. E-mail: ckotlar@fi.mdp.edu.ar
407
408
C. E. Kotlar et al.
Seed Preparation
The mentioned microorganisms were activated in two steps. The strains
were subcultured in BHI and incubated at 32 C for 24 hr. First, a loop was
inoculated in 8 mL BHI; after that 2 mL of culture was centrifuged at
1,000 rpm for 3 min at 4 C. The precipitate was then added to 25 mL fresh
BHI and statically incubated at 32 C for 24 hr.
The B. cereus culture (0.5% v=v) was allow to grow in minimal broth
(MB), an agarless modified basal medium (MM) containing 0.1% bacteriological glucose (w=v) (Britannia, lot 095, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and
0.25% yeast extract (w=v) (Acumedia, lot 66-22, Maryland), buffered at
pH 8 and at 32 C, which represents the optimal conditions for peptidase
production.[10] The bacterial cells were grown in MB in a 250-mL
Erlenmeyer flask on an orbital shaker (TS-1000, Zhejiang, China).
409
Variables
Inorganic nitrogen
source (0.5%)
Metal ions
Agitation speed (rpm)
Initial pH
Brewers spent
grains (1)
Sunflower
cake (2)
Soybean
cake (3)
Wheat
bran (4)
(NH4)2SO4 (1)
NO3K (2)
NO3Na (3)
NH4Cl (4)
Mn (1)
0 (1)
5 (1)
Fe (2)
40 (2)
7 (2)
Cu (3)
80 (3)
9 (3)
Zn (4)
120 (4)
11 (4)
410
C. E. Kotlar et al.
Variable
Grinding time (s)
Polyphenols
extraction runs
15 (2)
1 (2)
100% of Pilsner
malt (3)
30 (3)
2 (3)
411
flask separately, sterilized at 121.5 C for 15 min, and cooled. The initial pH
(5, 7, 9, and 11) was adjusted under sterile conditions using the previously
sterilized sodium carbonate solution. Then the fermentation medium was
inoculated with 5% v=v microorganism culture and incubated at 32 C for
36 hr in an orbital shaker at 0, 40, 80, and 120 rpm, depending on the
experimental matrix.
After incubation the crude enzyme was obtained by centrifuging the
culture broth at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 C. The cell-free supernatant,
which contains the enzyme, was assayed for peptidase activity.
Enzyme
Proteolytic activity of the cell-free culture supernatants was assessed by
using azocasein as substrate. Briefly, 120 mL of supernatant was incubated
with 480 mL of 10 g=L azocasein in buffer, 100 mM Tris, pH 7, for 30 min
at 32 C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 480 mL trichloroacetic
acid (TCA) to a final concentration of 100 g=L and incubated for 30 min at
4 C before being centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min; 800 mL of the supernatant from the centrifuged reaction was added to 200 mL of 1.8 N sodium
hydroxide and the absorbances at 420 nm were measured in a Spectrum
SP-2000 ultraviolet (UV) spectrophotometer (Zhejiang, China). For the
control, the reaction was stopped with TCA immediately after the supernatant was added. One enzyme activity unit (U) was expressed as the
amount of enzyme that caused a change of absorbance of 0.01 at 420 nm
under the assay conditions (120 mL of enzyme source, 30 min at 32 C).
Experimental Design
Taguchi Method
The Taguchi experimental design allowed us to determine the most
suitable organic substrate, the metal ion that promotes the hydrolysis and
the initial pH optimum to start the fermentation process (Tables 1 and 3).
Having established the main effects, it was determined also through the
Taguchi method the effects of organic substrate variety, the milling degree,
and the extraction polyphenols level over the hydrolysis ability of Bacillus
cereus (Tables 2 and 4).
These experimental designs allowed examining five factors in four
levels and three factors in three levels, respectively. As already mentioned,
the levels of the factors studied and the layout of the Taguchis array are
shown in Tables 1 and 2.
The results were analyzed to extract independently the main factors
effects; the variance technique analysis was then applied to determine
which factors were statistically significant. The controlling factors were
412
C. E. Kotlar et al.
TABLE 3 L16 Orthogonal Array of Taguchi Experimental Design and Corresponding Peptidase
Production by Bacillus cereus in a Submerged Culture
Proteolytic activity in a submerged
medium (U)
Run
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Organic
substrate
Inorganic
nitrogen
Metal
ions
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
1
2
3
4
2
1
4
3
3
4
1
2
4
3
2
1
1
2
3
4
4
3
2
1
2
1
4
3
3
4
1
2
0.113
0.351
0.075
0.097
0.062
0
0.028
0
0.093
0
0.05
0.176
0
0
0.004
0
With exogenous
carbon source
0.188
0.359
0.211
0.346
0.196
0.050
0.018
0.062
0.059
0.031
0.032
0.035
0.019
0.037
0.116
0
Note. Each result is the mean of three determinations; standard errors were less than 10% of the
means.
identified, through the magnitude of the quantified effects, and the statistically significant effects were determined. Accordingly, the optimal conditions were determined by combining the factors levels that had the
highest main effect value. All calculations were performed using SAS software (version 8.0, Cary, NC).
TABLE 4 L9 Orthogonal Arrays of Taguchi Experimental Design and Corresponding Peptidase
Production by Bacillus cereus in a Submerged Culture With BSG as Organic Substrate
Run
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Variety
Grinding time
Polyphenols
extraction runs
Proteolytic activity in a
submerged medium (U)
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
2
3
1
3
1
2
0.489
0.693
0.641
0.615
0.661
0.330
0.207
0.647
0.536
Note. Each result is the mean of three determinations; standard errors were less than 10% of the
means.
413
Mixture Design
The mixture design method was used to obtain the possible proportions of the selected solid substrates. In the mixture experiment, the independent factors were proportions of different components in a blend and
the total proportions of the different factors had to be 100%.
Thus, the component concentrations cannot be independently changed.[13] However, one cannot design experiments where the concentration
of each media component equals one. To overcome this, the concentration
of each medium component in a given experiment was expressed in terms
of a fraction of the maximum value. These calculated proportions are
named as coded values.
An augmented simplex centric design from Scheffes special cubic
model (3, 2), consisting of 7 (23 1) runs in addition to three replicated
vertices, was used (see Table 8, shown later).[14]
As the presence of three components always generates higher responses
than the pure components, it was necessary to use constraints. In a preliminary experiment that was carried out without establish constraints conditions, a maximum response was not found in the boundary region
(data not shown).
Algebraically, the experimental design constraints are as follows. Lets Xi
denote the proportion of i in the mixture and n the number of components:
Mixture design constraints were:
n
X
Xi 1
i1
0:5 X1 0:7
0:25 X2 0:45
0:05 X3 0:25
where X1, X2, and X3 are the BSG, starch, and FeSO4 proportions, respectively. For each component the equations established low and high
constraints.
The model that represents the response as a function of the mixture
variables consists of a first-order function (linear), described as follows:
Y
X3
i1
bi xi
414
C. E. Kotlar et al.
Validation
To validate the proposed experimental methodology, fermentation
experiments were performed in triplicate for peptidase production by
employing the obtained optimized culture conditions and composition.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Effect of Medium Components and Environment Conditions on
Peptidase Production
Fermentation Medium without Starch
Taguchi experimental results designed in 16 runs, for the five factors,
that is, nitrogen organic source, nitrogen inorganic source, metal ions,
agitation speed, and initial pH, were chosen for the peptidase production
optimization by Bacillus cereus spp. strain.
Table 3 shows the proteolytic activity ranging from 0 to 0.359 U
corresponding to the combined effect of the five factors in their specific
ranges. The experimental results suggested that these factors at optimum
level strongly support the peptidase production. In run 16, with wheat bran
as organic substrate, NH4Cl (0.5% w=v) as inorganic nitrogen source, Mn
(0.5 g=L) as metal ions, 80 rpm, and neutral initial pH, peptidase production was not observed in fermentation medium with and without starch
as an exogenous carbon source. The higher enzyme production (0.351 U)
was observed in run 2 with a combination of brewers spent grain (BSG),
NO3K (0.5% w=v), Fe (0.2 g=L), 40 rpm, and neutral initial pH. Figure 1
FIGURE 1 Contribution of five factors on protease production and microorganism growth by Bacillus
cereus in a submerged culture: & without exogenous carbon source, and with starch as exogenous
carbon source, using Taguchi experimental design. A: organic substrate, B: inorganic nitrogen source;
C: metal ions; D: agitation speed; E: initial pH.
415
FIGURE 2 Effect of organic substrate (a and b), metal ion (c and d) and initial pH (e) in a submerged
culture without exogenous carbon source (a, c and e) and with starch (b and d) on protease
production, measured as the absorbance at 420 nm.
416
C. E. Kotlar et al.
Organic
substrate
CarboIron
Ca
P
Water Protein Fat hydrate Fiber (mg=100 g) (mg=100 g) (mg=100 g)
BSG
SFC
SBC
WB
78.00
6.72
6.11
2.17
4.31
NA
0.21
45.6
NA
NA
2.63
15.1
160
400
13.33
78.3
650
1000
300
560
Reference
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
417
TABLE 6 ANOVA for Peptidase Production by Bacillus cereus in Medium Without Exogenous Carbon
Source
Source
DF
Sum of squares
Mean square
F value
Pr > F
Model
A
C
E
Error
Total
9
3
3
3
6
15
0.11726656
0.06132519
0.03807669
0.01786469
0.01635837
0.13362494
0.01302962
0.02044173
0.01269223
0.00595490
0.00272640
0.00595490
4.78
7.50
4.66
2.18
0.0352
0.0187
0.0522
0.1909
Note. R-squared: 0.878; coefficient of variation: 79.039; root MSE: 0.052; mean: 0.066. A: Organic substrate; C: metal ions; E: initial pH; asterisk indicates significant terms.
418
C. E. Kotlar et al.
TABLE 7 ANOVA for Peptidase Production by Bacillus cereus in Medium With Starch as Exogenous
Carbon Source
Source
DF
Sum of squares
Mean square
F value
Pr > F
Model
A
C
Error
Total
6
3
3
9
15
0.0994
0.0613
0.0381
0.0342
0.1336
0.1650
0.0204
0.0126
0.0036
4.36
5.38
3.34
0.0244
0.0214
0.0698
Note. R-squared: 0.988; coefficient of variation: 41.627; root MSE: 0.046; mean: 0.110. A: Organic substrate; C: metal ions; asterisk indicates significant terms.
significant in this case the organic nitrogen source and metal ions versus
the pH fermentation medium.
Several studies have reported that proteins and peptides are necessary
for effective peptidase production, while carbohydrates repressed peptidase
formation.[2426] However, some works reported better peptidase synthesis
in the presence of a carbon source.[27,28]
The data analysis for the determination of significant parameters on peptidase production has been performed and the results are shown in Table 7.
From the calculated ratio (F), the model F value was 4.36, which implies the
model significance. The minor significance of metallic ions could attribute
to the supplementation with starch that provides an additional iron level.[29]
Although the organic substrates contained endogenous carbohydrates,
in general the starch addition favored the enzyme activity from B. cereus
(Table 5), probably due to the fact that these carbohydrates could not be
use as an immediate energy source. Thus, in the further experiments the
medium was supplemented with this exogenous carbohydrate source.
Effect of Organic Substrate Pretreatment on Peptidase
Production
The organic substrate of the medium was the most significant factor
among all selected optimization parameters at an individual level, with
BSG showing the highest peptidase production (Table 4).
BSG is an interesting raw material; it is rich in nutrients and minerals,
and cheap as well, as it is a readily available by-product from the brewing
industry.[30]
In order to investigate how preliminary pretreatments applied on the
organic substrate affect the enzyme production, an L9 (33) experimental
design was performed with three different factors named BSG varieties,
milling time, and polyphenols extraction runs. The experimental layout
for the peptidase production using the L9 orthogonal array is shown in
Table 2 and 4. The experiments were conducted using three levels
419
(Table 2). Table 4 also shows the experimental results for the response
(peptidase production). Pretreatments applied on BSG organic substrate
significantly affected the peptidase activity from B. cereus (Table 4).
The maximal peptidase production (0.693 U) was reached in run 2 with
the following operating conditions: variety 1, 15 s of milling time and one
polyphenols extraction run (2) (Table 4), which gave twice the peptidase
production mentioned in run 3 from Table 3. However, the evaluation of
the effect that each factor had on the peptidase production indicated that
the milling time was the only most significant factor for the peptidase production (Figure 3), with a maximum at 15 s milling time (Figure 4). BSG
varieties and polyphenols extraction runs were observed to exert 21.69%
and 19.82%, respectively. The lower influence of BSG varieties could be
interpreted because no statistically significant differences (p-value >0.05)
in the protein content among varieties were found.[5] Then it would be
not expected that there would be any substantial difference in the capacity
of fermentation from B. cereus. Therefore, a pool of BSG formed by the
same proportion of each variety was used for the further experiments.
As the polyphenols extraction cycle had a low contribution to the peptidase production, only one polyphenols extraction cycle was used for the
followed experimental procedures, taking into account the maximal average in the response. It is well known that polyphenols could inhibit some
matrix peptidases.[31] For that reason the option of treatment without polyphenols extraction cycle was discarded. In the other extreme, with two
extraction cycles, the extraction solution could affect the native protein
conformations, altering the active site so that the enzymatic hydrolysis
could be lower.
FIGURE 3 Contribution of the three factors on protease production by Bacillus cereus in a submerged
culture with BSG, using Taguchi experimental design.
420
C. E. Kotlar et al.
FIGURE 4 Effect of BSG grinding time in a submerged culture with BSG on protease production,
measured as the absorbance at 420 nm.
Mixture Design
The results using the proposed mixture design showed that peptidase
production varied within the range of 0.4260.601 U (Table 8). The highest
enzyme production (0.601 U) was observed in the eighth run in the experimental setup, which contained 60% BSG, 35% starch, and the rest FeSO4.
To obtain information concerning the media components interaction
over the enzyme production, the contours of constant height were plotted
on the two-dimensional (2D) triangle in a contour plot. Figure 5 illustrates
how different media components interact with each other, influencing the
enzyme production by B. cereus. Near the vertex where maximum iron content is present, a decreased in the enzyme production is predicted. This
could be attributed to the iron excess, which could create an oxidizing
environment, which can cause irreparable cell damage.[32]
Results of the analysis of variance using ADX Interface of SAS indicate
that X1 and X2 are significant and will be used in the response optimization, while X3 is not significant. Since the estimate parameters X1 and X2
are almost similar in magnitude, it can be concluded that both components
are effective in the medium formulation for peptidase production. BSG
and starch presented a positive influence on enzyme production
(Table 8). BSG had the lowest p-value (0.0001), indicating that it had a significant effect on the changes in its concentration on the peptidase production. On the contrary, Fe had the highest p-value, indicating that
peptidase production is not dependent on the concentration of this metal
source. Based on the preceding results it can be concluded that BSG and
starch are statistically significant factors and should be included in further
421
TABLE 8 Mixture Design Used in This Study. Experimental Results Obtained for the Dependent Variables and Predicted Values by Linear Model
Proportion
Run
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Design point
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
All
components
components
components
components
components
components
components
components
components
components
BSG X1 (g=L)
Starch X2 (g=L)
Fe X3 (g=L)
Coded
Real
Coded
Real
Coded
Real
Experimental
Predicted
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.57
0.60
0.60
0.70
0.70
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
12.00
13.68
14.40
14.40
16.80
16.80
0.25
0.25
0.35
0.45
0.45
0.32
0.25
0.35
0.25
0.25
6.00
6.00
8.40
10.80
10.80
7.68
6.00
8.40
6.00
6.00
0.25
0.25
0.15
0.05
0.05
0.12
0.15
0.05
0.05
0.05
6.00
6.00
3.60
1.20
1.20
2.88
3.60
1.20
1.20
1.20
0.426
0.439
0.476
0.512
0.502
0.548
0.584
0.601
0.530
0.518
0.430
0.430
0.474
0.518
0.518
0.506
0.494
0.538
0.558
0.558
Note. Each experimental result is the mean of three determinations; standard errors were less than
10% of the means.
where Y is the peptidase production, X1 the BSG content, and X2 the starch
content. Thus the predicted values obtained with Eq. (1) are shown in
Table 8.
422
C. E. Kotlar et al.
FIGURE 7 Proteolytic activity in optimized fermentation medium with mixed inoculum at 32 C in a
rotatory shaker at 60 rpm.
x1
x2
x3
423
Std. error
t Ratio
p-Value
0.63917
0.44362
0.09363
0.086299
0.1394
0.17036
7.4064
3.1823
0.54959
0.0001
0.0154
0.5997
424
C. E. Kotlar et al.
REFERENCES
1. Hasan, F.; Shah, A.A.; Hameed A. Industrial Applications of Microbial Lipases. Enzyme Microb.
Technol. 2006, 39(2), 235251.
2. Frost, G.M.; Moss, D.A. Production of Enzymes by Fermentation. In Biotechnology, Vol. 7a, Rehm,
H.J., Reed, G., Eds.; Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1987; pp. 65211.
3. Amara, A.A.; Ehab, A.S. Wool Quality Improvement Using Thermophilic Crude Proteolytic
Microbial Enzymes. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 2008, 3(4), 554560.
4. Priest, F.G. Extracellular Enzyme Synthesis in the Genus Bacillus. Bacteriol. Rev. 1977, 41, 711753.
5. Kotlar, C.E.; Belagardi, M.; Roura, S.I. Brewers Spent Grain, a Suitable Substrate for Protein Hydrolyzate Production Through the Synergistic Activity of Bacillus cereus and Pseudomonas Strains. Biotech.
Appl. Biochem. 2011, 58(6), 464475.
6. Joo, H.S.; Chang, C.S. Production of Protease From a New Alkalophilic Bacillus sp. I-312 Grown on
Soybean Meal: Optimization and Some Properties. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 12631270.
7. El Hadji, N.; Hmidet, N.; Souissi, N.; Sellami-Kamoun, A.; Nasri, M. The Use of an Economical
Medium for the Production of Alkaline Serine Protease by Bacillus licheniformis NH1. Afr. J.
Biotechnol. 2010, 9(18), 26682674.
8. Beg, Q.K.; Sahai, V.; Gupta, R. Statistical Media Optimization and Alkaline Protease Production
From Bacillus mojavensis in a Bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2003, 39, 203209.
9. Perez Borla, O.; Davidovich, L.A.; Roura, S.I. Isolation and Characterization of Proteolytic Microorganisms From Fresh and Fermented Cabbage. LWTFood Sci. Technol. 2010, 43(2), 298301.
10. Kotlar, C.E.; Sansevero, R.; Ponce, A.G.; Roura, S.I. Characterization of Bacillus cereus Isolated From
Fermented Cabbage and Conventional Optimization of Extracellular Protease Production. Internet
J. Microbiol. 2009, 8(1), DOI: 10.5580-e7d.
11. Salem, S.R.; Shabed, M.S.A.; Amara, A.A. Optimization of Thermophilic Protease Production in
Bacillus Mixed Culture Under Mesophilic Condition. World J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 5(3), 375383.
12. Seyedeh, F.G.O.; Fatemeh, T.; Bagher, Y.; Fereshteh, E. Enhancement of Alkaline Protease Production
by Bacillus clausii Using Taguchi Experimental Design. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 6(22), 25592564.
13. Scheffe, H. Simplex-Centroid Designs for Experiments With Mixtures. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. 1963, 25,
253263.
14. Gabrielsson, J.; Lindberg, N.O.; Lundstedt, T. Multivariate Methods in Pharmaceutical Applications.
J. Chemometrics 2002, 16, 141160.
15. Do Nascimento, W.C.A.; Martins, M.L.L. Production and Properties of an Extracellular Protease
From Thermophilic Bacillus sp. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2004, 35, 9196.
16. Abebe, Y.; Bogale, A.; Hambidge, K.M.; Stoecker, B.J.; Bailey, K.; Gibson, R.S. Phytate, Zinc, Iron
and Calcium Content of Selected Raw and Prepared Foods Consumed in Rural Sidama, Southern
Ethiopia, and Implications for Bioavailability. J. Food Comp. Anal. 2008, 20(3), 161168.
17. Paranthaman, R.; Alagusundaram, K.; Indhumathi, J. Production of Protease From Rice Mill Wastes
by Aspergillus niger in Solid State Fermentation. World J. Agric. Sci. 2009, 5(3), 308312.
18. Younis, M.A.M.; Hezayen, F.F.; Nour-Eldein, M.A.; Shabeb, M.S.A. Production of Protease in
Low-Cost Medium by Bacillus subtilis KO strain. Global J. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2009, 4(2), 132137.
425
19. Wang, S.L.; Kao, T.Y.; Wang, C.L.; Yen, Y.H.; Chem, M.K.; Chen, Y.H. A Solvent Stable Metalloprotease Produced by Bacillus sp. TKU004 and Its Application in the Deproteinization of Squid Pen for
Beta-Chitin Preparation. Enzyme Microbiol. Technol. 2006, 39, 724731.
20. Mussacco, A.E. Production of Alkaline Protease From Bacillus subtilis NRRI 3441. Rev. Argent.
Microbiol. 1980, 12, 5258.
21. Chantawannakul, P.; Oncharoen, A.; Klanbut, K.; Chukeatirote, E.; Lumyong, S. Characterisation of
Proteases of Bacillus subtilis strain 38 Isolated From Traditionally Fermented Soybean in Northern
Thiland. Sci. Asia 2002, 28, 241245.
22. Eblinger, H.M. Handbook of Brewing: Processes, Technology and Market. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim,
Germany, 2009.
23. Isikwenu, J.O.; Apodiete, O.J.; Emegha, I.O.; Bratle, L. Effect of Dietary Fibre (Maize Cob) Levels on
Performance of Broiler Birds. Proceedings of Nigerian Society of Animal Production 2000, 158160.
24. Maina, J.G.; Beames, R.M.; Higgs, D.; Mbugua, P.N.; Iwama, G.; Kisia, S.M. Digestibility and Feeding
Value of Some Feed Ingredients Fed to Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (L.). Aquac. Res. 2002, 33(11),
853862.
25. Edema, M.O.; Sanni, I.O.; Sanni, A.I. Evaluation of Maize-soybean Flour Blends for Sour Maize
Bread Production in Nigeria. Fri. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 4, 911918.
26. Shenoy, A.H.; Prakash, J. Wheat Bran (Triticum aestivum): Composition, Functionality and Incorporation in Unleavened Bread. J. Food Quality 2002, 25(3), 197211.
27. Venil, C.K.; Lakshmanaperumalsamy, P. Taguchi Experimental Design for Medium Optimization for
Enhanced Protease Production by Bacillus subtilis HB04. e-Journal Sci. Technol. 2009, 13. http://
e-jst.teiath.gr/issue_13_2009/Venil_13.pdf
28. Drucker, H. Regulation of Exocellular Proteases in Neurospora crassa: Induction and Repression of
Enzyme Synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 1972, 110, 10411049.
29. Ferrero, M.A.; Castro, G.R.; Abate, C.M.; Baigori, M.D.; Sineriz, F. Thermostable Alkaline Proteases
of Bacillus licheniformis MIR 29: Isolation, Production and Characterization. Appl. Microbiol.
Biotechnol. 1996, 45, 327332.
30. Fukushima, Y.; Itho, H.; Fukase, T.; Motai, H. Continuous Protease Production in a Carbon-Limited
Chemostat Culture by Salt Tolerant Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1989, 30, 604608.
31. Gessesse, A.; Gashe, B.A. Production of alkaline protease by an alkalophilic bacteria isolated from
an alkaline soda lake. Biotechnol. Lett. 1997, 19, 479481.
32. Mehrotra, S.; Pandey, P.K.; Gaur, R.; Darmwal, N.S. The production of alkaline protease by a Bacillus
species isolate. Bioresource Technol. 1999, 7, 201203.
33. Garrow, J.S.; Ralph, A.; James, W.P.T. Human Nutrition and Dietietics; 10th ed. Churchill Livingstone:
Edinburgh, UK, 2000.
34. Aliyu, S.; Bala, M. Brewers Spent Grain: A Review of Its Potentials and Applications. Afr. J. Biotechnol.
2001, 10(3), 324331.
35. Sartora, L.; Pezzato, E.; DellAica, I.; Caniato, R.; Biggin, S.; Garbis, S. Inhibition of Matrix-Proteases
by Polyphenols: Chemical Insights For Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Invasion Drug Design. Biochem.
Pharmacol. 2002, 64(2), 229237.
36. Rispoli, F.; Shah, V. Mixture Design as a First Step for Optimization of Fermentation Medium for
Cutinase Production From Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 34,
349355.
37. Oyama, H.; Aoki, H.; Amano, M.; Mizuki, E.; Yoshimoto, T.; Tsuru, D.; Murao, S. Purification and
Characterization of a Prolyl Endopeptidase From Pseudomonas sp. KU-22. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1997,
84(6), 538542.
38. Gobbetti, M.; Smacchi, E.; Stepaniak, L.; Crea, F.; Fox, P.F. Purification and Characterization of an
Endopeptidase From Pseudomonas fluorescens ATCC 948. J. Food Biochem. 2007, 22(1), 1735.
39. Odagaki, Y.; Hayashi, A.; Okada, K.; Hirotsu, K.; Kabashima, T.; Ito, K.; Yoshimoto, T.; Tsuru, D.;
Sato, M.; Clardy, J. The Crystal Structure of Pyroglutamyl Peptidase I From Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Reveals a New Structure for a Cysteine Protease. Structure 1999, 7(4), 399411.
40. Lassagno, M.; Beoleito, V.; Sesma, F.; Raya, R.; Font, G.; Eraso, A. Selection of Bacteriocin Producer
Strains of Lactic Acid Bacteria From Dietary Environment. N. Microbiol. 2002, 25, 3744.
41. Diop, M.B.; Dubois-Dauphin, R.; Tine, E.; Ngom, E.; Destain, J.; Thonart, P. Bacteriocin Producers
From Traditional Food Products. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2007, 11(4), 275281.
Copyright of Preparative Biochemistry & Biotechnology is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content
may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express
written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.