Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Problems 1-5 illustrate an example of trade induced by comparative advantage. They assume that China and France
each have 1,000 production units. With one unit of production (a mix of land, labor, capital, and technology), China
can produce either 10 containers of toys or 7 cases of wine. France can produce either 2 cases of toys or 7 cases of
wine. Thus, a production unit in China is five times as efficient compared to France when producing toys, but
equally efficient when producing wine. Assume at first that no trade takes place. China allocates 800 production
units to building toys and 200 production units to producing wine. France allocates 200 production units to building
toys and 800 production units to producing wine.
Wine
(cases/unit)
7
7
Toys
Wine
CHINA
Allocated production units to
Produces and consumes (output per unit x units allocated)
800
8,000
200
1,400
FRANCE
Allocated production units to
Produces and consumes (output per unit x units allocated)
200
400
800
5,600
8,400
7,000
Assumptions
China -- output per unit of production input
France -- output per unit of production input
China -- total production inputs
France -- total production inputs
Assumptions
China -- output per unit of production input
France -- output per unit of production input
China -- total production inputs
France -- total production inputs
Toys
(containers/unit)
10
2
1,000
1,000
Wine
(cases/unit)
7
7
Toys
Wine
1,000
10,000
10,000
The combined production of both countries is 10,000 containers of toys, 1,600 more containers of toys than
before specialization, with wine production remaining unchanged.
1,000
7,000
7,000
Assumptions
China -- output per unit of production input
France -- output per unit of production input
China -- total production inputs
France -- total production inputs
Toys
(containers/unit)
10
2
1,000
1,000
Wine
(cases/unit)
7
7
Toy
Production
TOYS
Exports (-)/
Imports (+)
Domestic
Consumption
1,000
10,000
(2,000)
8,000
2,000
2,000
1,000
7,000
10,000
7,000
10,000
Wine
Production
WINE
Exports (-)/
Imports (+)
Domestic
Consumption
1,400
1,400
(1,400)
5,600
7,000
Assumptions
China -- output per unit of production input
France -- output per unit of production input
China -- total production inputs
France -- total production inputs
Toys
(containers/unit)
10
2
1,000
1,000
Wine
(cases/unit)
7
7
Toy
Production
TOYS
Exports (-)/
Imports (+)
Domestic
Consumption
1,000
10,000
(400)
9,600
400
400
1,000
7,000
10,000
7,000
10,000
Wine
Production
WINE
Exports (-)/
Imports (+)
Domestic
Consumption
1,400
1,400
(1,400)
5,600
7,000
Toy production and consumption in China increases from 8,000 containers of toys before trade to 9,600 containers -- 1,600 more containers -- after trade. Wine production and consumption remains
the same as before trade. Thus the full benefit of trade goes to China when trading at France's domestic prices.
Assumptions
China -- output per unit of production input
France -- output per unit of production input
China -- total production inputs
France -- total production inputs
Toys
(containers/unit)
10
2
1,000
1,000
Wine
(cases/unit)
7
7
Toy
Production
TOYS
Exports (-)/
Imports (+)
Domestic
Consumption
1,000
10,000
(1,200)
8,800
1,200
1,200
1,000
7,000
10,000
7,000
10,000
Wine
Production
China gains 800 more containers of toys (8,800 post-trade compared to 8,000 pre-trade), and enjoys the same level of wine consumption (1,400).
France gains 800 more containers of toys (1,200 post-trade compared to 400 pre-trade), and enjoys the same level of wine consumption (5,600).
Wine production therefore remains the same as before trade, but now the 1,600 increased production of toys is split evenly between the two countries.
WINE
Exports (-)/
Imports (+)
Domestic
Consumption
1,400
1,400
(1,400)
5,600
7,000
U.S. Parent
Company
(US$)
$4,500
35%
------
Brazilian
Subsidiary
(reais, R$)
R$6,250
25%
R$1.80/$
German
Subsidiary
(euros, )
4,500
40%
0.7018/$
Chinese
Subsidiary
(yuan, Y)
Y2,500
30%
Y7.750/$
4,500.00
(1,575.00)
2,925.00
35%
-----$ 2,925.00
$ 9,602.22
650.00
Brazilian
Subsidiary
(reais, R$)
25%
6,250.00
(1,562.50)
4,687.50
German
Subsidiary
(euros, )
40%
4,500.00
(1,800.00)
2,700.00
1.8000
$ 2,604.17
0.7018
$ 3,847.25
27.1%
40.1%
Chinese
Subsidiary
(yuan, Y)
2,500.00
(750.00)
1,750.00
30%
7.7500
225.81
14.77
30.5%
69.5%
2.4%
4,500.00
(1,575.00)
2,925.00
35%
Brazilian
Subsidiary
(reais, R$)
-----2,925.00
9,602.22
650.00
14.77
6,250.00
(1,562.50)
4,687.50
25%
German
Subsidiary
(euros, )
4,500.00
(1,800.00)
2,700.00
40%
1.8000
2,604.17
Chinese
Subsidiary
(yuan, Y)
2,500.00
(750.00)
1,750.00
30%
0.7018
3,847.25
7.7500
225.81
4,500.00
(1,575.00)
2,925.00
35%
-----2,925.00
8,560.56
650.00
13.17
-10.8%
Brazilian
Subsidiary
(reais, R$)
6,250.00
(1,562.50)
4,687.50
25%
3.0000
1,562.50
German
Subsidiary
(euros, )
4,500.00
(1,800.00)
2,700.00
40%
0.7018
3,847.25
Chinese
Subsidiary
(yuan, Y)
2,500.00
(750.00)
1,750.00
30%
7.7500
225.81
35%
U.S. Parent
Company
(US$)
Brazilian
Subsidiary
(reais, R$)
German
Subsidiary
(euros, )
Chinese
Subsidiary
(yuan, Y)
4,500.00
(1,575.00)
2,925.00
6,250.00
(1,562.50)
4,687.50
4,500.00
(1,800.00)
2,700.00
2,500.00
(750.00)
1,750.00
25%
-----2,925.00
9,602.22
650.00
14.77
40%
1.8000
2,604.17
30%
0.7018
3,847.25
7.7500
225.81
Brazilian reais falls in value against the U.S. dollar and Americo's Brazilian sales decline
U.S. Parent
Company
(US$)
4,500.00
(1,575.00)
2,925.00
35%
-----2,925.00
8,448.06
650.00
13.00
-12.0%
Brazilian
Subsidiary
(reais, R$)
5,800.00
(1,450.00)
4,350.00
25%
3.0000
1,450.00
German
Subsidiary
(euros, )
4,500.00
(1,800.00)
2,700.00
40%
0.7018
3,847.25
Chinese
Subsidiary
(yuan, Y)
2,500.00
(750.00)
1,750.00
30%
7.7500
225.81
1.8000
20%
1.5000
0.7018
20%
0.5848
7.7500
20%
6.4583
U.S. Parent
Company
(US$)
Brazilian
Subsidiary
(reais, R$)
German
Subsidiary
(euros, )
Chinese
Subsidiary
(yuan, Y)
4,500.00
(1,575.00)
2,925.00
35%
-----
-----2,925.00
10,937.67
650.00
14.77
16.83
4,500.00
(1,800.00)
2,700.00
40%
1.5000
3,125.00
2,500.00
(750.00)
1,750.00
30%
0.5848
4,616.70
6.4583
270.97
13.9%
-----
1.8000
-20%
2.2500
0.7018
-20%
0.8773
7.7500
-20%
9.6875
U.S. Parent
Company
(US$)
Brazilian
Subsidiary
(reais, R$)
German
Subsidiary
(euros, )
Chinese
Subsidiary
(yuan, Y)
4,500.00
(1,575.00)
2,925.00
35%
6,250.00
(1,562.50)
4,687.50
25%
-----2,925.00
8,266.78
650.00
14.77
12.72
6,250.00
(1,562.50)
4,687.50
25%
2.2500
2,083.33
4,500.00
(1,800.00)
2,700.00
40%
0.8773
3,077.80
-13.9%
2,500.00
(750.00)
1,750.00
30%
9.6875
180.65
4,500.00
(1,575.00)
2,925.00
35%
Brazilian
Subsidiary
(reais, R$)
-----2,925.00
9,602.22
650.00
14.77
1,575.00
5,104.66
6,250.00
(1,562.50)
4,687.50
25%
German
Subsidiary
(euros, )
4,500.00
(1,800.00)
2,700.00
40%
Chinese
Subsidiary
(yuan, Y)
2,500.00
(750.00)
1,750.00
30%
1.8000
2,604.17
0.7018
3,847.25
7.7500
225.81
868.06
2,564.83
96.77
3,472.22
6,412.08
322.58
4,500.00
Consolidated EBT
Total tax bill
Effective tax rate
$
$
14,706.89
5,104.66
34.7%
c. What would be the impact on Americo's EPS and global effective tax rate if Germany instituted a tax cut to 28%, and German subsidiary earnings
rose to 5 million euros?
U.S. Parent
Brazilian
German
Chinese
Company
Subsidiary
Subsidiary
Subsidiary
Business Performance (000s)
(US$)
(reais, R$)
(euros, )
(yuan, Y)
Earnings before taxes, EBT (local currency)
Less corporate income taxes
Net profits of individual subsidiary
Avg exchange rate for the period (fc/$)
Net profits of individual subsidiary (US$)
4,500.00
(1,575.00)
2,925.00
35%
-----2,925.00
6,250.00
(1,562.50)
4,687.50
25%
5,000.00
(1,400.00)
3,600.00
28%
2,500.00
(750.00)
1,750.00
30%
1.8000
2,604.17
0.7018
5,129.67
7.7500
225.81
10,884.64
650.00
16.75
4,500.00
3,472.22
7,124.54
322.58
1,575.00
868.06
1,994.87
96.77
$
$
15,419.34
4,534.70
29.4%