Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
By
GROUP 6 SECTION B
Dasi Prithvi Tej
PGP13019
Binita Kumari
PGP13081
Rakesh Krishna V
PGP13108
Shital Kumar
PGP13118
Rohith Votarikari
PGP13129
MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Macro-economic factors affecting the Airlines Industry are:
High ATF costs, no control over the volatility Aviation Turbine Fuel(ATF)
prices are driven by the volatility in demand-supply of global crude oil. Rising
fuel costs forces to increase price of ticket which eventually leads in the decline
in airline traffic.
Higher sales tax in India In India, ATF prices are more because of higher
sales tax ranging from 4 to 30 per cent because of which fuel cost escalate
leading to operational inefficiencies.
Exchange Rate operating costs for airline companies include ATF costs,
aircraft lease rental costs, staff costs, selling costs, and administrative costs
etc., close to 70 percent of these costs are linked with US Dollar. Hence,
fluctuations in exchange rate directly impact the operating costs of the
companies.
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
Evolution of the industry and present competitive landscape
2011-12: Strong
growth in
domestic
passenger traffic
2008-09: Jump in
fuel costs hit
airlines'
operating
margins
2012-13: The
year of the low
fare carriers
2013-14:
Operating
margins
plummet
to consolidation in the industry, wherein JetLite (Air Sahara) was acquired by Jet Airways,
while Kingfisher bought Air Deccan. The government decided to merge Indian Airlines with
Air India to form a new entity, National Aviation Company of India Limited (NACIL). The
move was taken due to the steadily mounting losses of Air India and Indian Airlines. As a
result of such consolidation, the market share of the top three players NACIL, Jet Airways
group and Kingfisher airlines rose to around 70 per cent at the end of 2008-09.
2009-10: Growing market share of LFCs:
LFCs such as Go Air, Indigo and SpiceJet continued to gain market share by expanding their
fleet. As a result, the share of the top three players (Jet Airways, Kingfisher and NACIL)
dropped to around 60 per cent in 2009-10. To sustain and expand their market share, Jet
Airways and Kingfisher introduced low-fare operations under the Jet Konnect and Kingfisher
Red brands, respectively. Jet Airways converted two-thirds of its seating capacity to Jet
Konnect by the end of the second half of 2009-10. Consequently, more airlines shifted to the
LFC model from the FSC model.
2010-11: PLFs touch record highs:
Entry of LFCs, higher household income, strong economic growth, surging tourist inflow,
increased air cargo movement, sustained business growth and supportive government policies
were major drivers for the growth in the domestic aviation industry in 2010-11. During the
year, PLFs reached record highs due to limited fleet addition and strong demand from
business and leisure travellers. Few efficient airlines with better operating cost structure and
financials turned profitable. The market share of the top three players (Jet Airways+ Jetlite ,
Kingfisher and Indigo) in the industry was about 61 per cent in 2010-11. PLFs increased to
77 per cent in 2010-11 from 72 per cent in 2009-10.
2012-13: Pricing Discipline post kingfisher exit:
The period saw a marked decrease in passenger traffic due to ongoing economic slowdown
and high air fares. Kingfisher exited domestic operations beginning in the 3rd quarter on
account of its financial woes, leading to about 13 per cent of total domestic capacity going
out of market. The remaining 6 players namely Indigo, Air India, Jet Airways, Jetlite, Spicejet
and Go air registered marginally better PLFs of 77 per cent and higher realizations post
kingfisher's exit. Indigo, Jet Group (Jet airways+ Jet Lite) and Spicejet together captured
close to 73 per cent of the domestic market.
Bargaining Power of
Suppliers - High
Bargaining Power of
Buyers - High
Low cost in switching
airlines
Low cost carrier flights
Competitors - High
No Brand loyalty among
patrons
Intense price competition
Low returns
Profitability:
Capital
Intensive
Stronger
influence of
External
Factors
Profitabili
ty
Longer
Recessions,
Shorter
Recoveries
Congestion
Inflating
Costs &
Deflating
Costs
Aggressive
Pricing
Strategy
Capital-intensive:
The airlines industry is capital-intensive, with high fixed costs for aircraft acquisition,
leasing and maintenance. The cost of maintaining aircrafts and complying with aviation
safety norms are high. Additional costs incurred on training pilots, technical support staff and
crew members are fixed as well. Moreover, the airlines industry has had to contend with
higher security and insurance charges since the September 11, 2001 terror attacks in the US.
ATF prices in India are expensive as compared to the rest of the world, owing to high local
sales taxes which ranges from 4-30 per cent. Consequently, airlines' fuel costs escalate,
leading to operational inefficiencies.
Congestion:
Congestion affects the turnaround time of aircrafts and reduces average aircraft utilisation
rates. This leads to wastage of fuel and inefficient use of aircrafts by airline companies.
Congestion can also cause inconvenience to passengers, as delays in flight take-offs will
unsettle their time schedules.
Aggressive price strategy:
Carriers often employ aggressive pricing strategies in order to capture higher market share
and sell tickets at below breakeven levels. This strategy reduces average yields and increases
competition, leading to losses for the entire industry as others will be forced to follow suit
and bring down their fares as well.
Inflating costs and deflating revenues:
For airlines globally, aircraft and other technical equipment costs, employee costs, landing
and parking charges at airports have risen significantly, with ticket prices not increasing in a
commensurate manner.
This has led to low revenues per passenger kilometre (RPKM) and rising expense per
available seats per kilometre (ASKM) for airline companies. Also, domestic airline
companies are unable to pass on increased costs because of severe competition in the
industry.
EBITDAR AND EBITDA margin
Technical Analysis
The term technical analysis is a complicated sounding name for a very basic approach
to investing. Simply put, technical analysis is the study of prices, with charts being the
primary tool. The roots of modern-day technical analysis stem from the Dow Theory
developed around 1900 by Charles Dow. Stemming either directly or indirectly from the Dow
Theory, these roots include such principles as the trending nature of prices, prices discounting
all known information, confirmation and divergence, volume mirroring changes in price, and
support/resistance. And of course, the widely followed Dow Jones Industrial Average is a
direct offspring of the Dow Theory. Here we mostly used Support/Resistance, MACD,
SMAVG (50), SMAVG (100), and SMAVG (200).
Bar charts
A bar chart displays a security's open (if available), high, low, and closing prices. Bar
charts are the most popular type of security chart. As illustrated in the bar chart in below
figure, the top of each vertical bar represents the highest price that the security traded during
the period, and the bottom of the bar represents the lowest price that it traded. A closing tick
is displayed on the right side of the bar to designate the last price that the security traded. If
opening prices are available, they are signified by a tick on the left side of the bar.
Moving Averages
Moving averages are one of the oldest and most popular technical analysis tools. A
moving average is the average price of a security at a given time. When calculating a moving
average, you specify the time span to calculate the average price (e.g., 25 days). A simple
moving average is calculated by adding the security's prices for the most recent n time
periods and then dividing by n. For example, adding the closing prices of a security for most
recent 25 days and then dividing by 25. The result is the security's average price over the last
25 days. This calculation is done for each period in the chart. Note that a moving average
cannot be calculated until you have n time periods of data. For example, you cannot display a
25-day moving average until the 25th day in a chart.
MACD
Jet Airways
Here on July 15 signal line cross over is negative, though the difference
between MACD and signal line is very less, it shows the beginning of
bear market and suggest to sell out the stock.
Whereas, in September and April the difference between MACD and
signal line is very high and positive, which shows a condition of bullish
market and suggest to buy stock.
Jagson Airlines
Kingfisher Airline
The arrow represents the upward and downward pressure on the stocks
at specific period.
Here also after June 15 the MACD continually goes on decreasing and
showing negative signal line cross over, this indicates bearish market.
Here prices are running somewhere around 50, which shows that there
is no trend.
Since past one year it doesnt come across the support zone i.e.
oversold territory. Whereas,
Somewhere during Feb, May and June, it was running under overbought
territory i.e. resistance Zone.
Jet Airways
Price are moving below 50 which means that stock losses are greater
than gain.
During April it was running under overbought zone, whereas for
sometimes in December and February it was running under oversold
zone.
Jagson airline
Here Prices are running much lower than 50 which means that stock losses
are much more greater than gain, it can be considered as bearish market
and suggest to sell the stock.
Kingfisher Airline
Here also price is moving much more below than 50 and showing a
condition of bearish market which suggests selling out the stock. During
February and March it was continuously running under oversold territory.
However prices are running below 50, but it started moving upwards with
expecting to increase in prices over a period of time.
Company Valuations:
SpiceJet
Valuing Airlines industry is difficult as operating profits itself are negative.
We have tried to value company Spicejet using discounted cash flow method
FCFF and used following assumptions
Assumptions of Valuation:
Currently Spicejet is in growth phase as we have observed it still makes
significant amount of Capital expenditure and also expanding its fleet
every year.
Terminal growth for Spicejet is assumed after 10 years.
High Growth phase for Spicejet is considered for coming 5 years after
which transition period is considered from year 6 to year 10.
Stable growth rate rate is assumed at 5% which would be on par with GDP
rate.
Instead of assuming overall growth rate in EBIT we have assumed
component wise growth rates as EBIT is negative for SpiceJet.
Beta in the stable growth phase will tend to one.
WACC is equal to return on Capital in stable growth phase.
Tax rate for the company is assumed to be zero due to previous years
high net operating loss
8.50%
7.00%
1.83
10%
21.3%
5%
Growth Rate in
Revenue
27%
25%
22%
20%
15%
15%
12%
12%
8%
6%
EBITDA/Reve
nue
-6%
-4%
-3%
-1%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
Growth Rate in
Capital Spending
-50%
-50%
-50%
-20%
-20%
-10%
-10%
5%
5%
5%
Growth Rate in
Depreciation
15%
15%
15%
15%
10%
10%
10%
5%
5%
5%
Revenues
EBITDA
Depreciation
EBIT
71128.6106
4267.716636
960.7675
-5228.484136
88910.76325
-3556.43053
1104.882625
-4661.313155
108471.1312
1270.615019
-4524.748954
130165.3574
3254.133935
1301.653574
1461.207272
-2762.860846
5
6
149690.161
172143.6852
0
1721.436852
1607.327999
1768.060799
-1607.327999
-46.623947
192800.9274
3856.018548
1944.866878
1911.151669
215937.0387
6478.11116
2042.110222
4436.000938
233212.0018
9328.48007
2144.215733
7184.264337
Terminal Year
247204.7219
12360.23609
2251.42652
10108.80957
-3922.235
-1961.1175
960.7675
1104.882625
10875.35221
355.643053
3
4
5
6
7
8
-4524.748954
-2762.860846
-1607.327999
-46.623947
1911.151669
4436.000938
7184.264337
10
10108.80957
-980.55875
-784.447
-627.5576
-564.80184
-508.321656
533.7377388
560.4246257
-588.445857
1270.615019
1461.207272
1607.327999
1768.060799
1944.866878
2042.110222
391.2073583
433.8845247
390.4960722
449.070483
413.1448444
462.7222257
2144.215733
345.4992619
2251.42652
279.8544021
7
1.5
19.00%
58.27%
13.76%
8
1.3
17.60%
58.27%
13.17%
18022
12908
0.582672048
0.417327952
14.72%
1 to 5
1.83
21.31%
58.27%
14.72%
6
1.6
19.70%
58.27%
14.05%
12.30%
0.406504065
113299.2117
Ter
min
10
1906
5.30
385
5873
.191
083
4625
.900
043
2519
.985
099
1018
.053
672
707.
5645
286
293
4.55
205
548
1.65
12
842
2.5
56
114
91.
94
113
299
al
FCF
F
PV
Calc
ulati
on
.2
1325
1.62
024
3431
5.30
265
4536
3.33
003
5683
0.13
745
6792
0.25
41
7893
6.15
501
8931
7.60
558
986
69.5
401
106
184.
337
111
127
.7
5530.271537
535
18.2
10.33695614
Sell
Relative Valuations
We have used Price/Sales multiple to relatively value all the companies. The
relative valuation results are as follows:
Company
Sales
Shares
outstan
ding
Jet Airway
176166.4
113.59
Jagson
Airways
Kingfisher
Global
Vectra
Spicejet
Sales/Sh
ares
outstan
ding
1550.897
086
20.168
5013.828
808.72
3301.26
14
63042.33
535
6.199708
181
235.8042
857
117.8361
308
Sales
Multipl
e
Relativ
e Price
0.16129
9
0.16129
9
0.16129
9
0.16129
9
0.16129
9
250.158
148
1.00000
673
38.0349
953
19.0068
5
Mark
et
Pric
e
254.
05
3.21
2.9
33.0
5
18.2
Note: Couldnt find the Sales of Jagson Airlines for the year 2013-14
Relative valuation shows that JetAirways and Kingfisher are overvalued and
Global Vectra and SpiceJet are undervalued in the industry when valued with
Sales Multiple.
Glossary
ASKM Available seats Kilometre
RPKM Revenue Passenger Kilometre
PLF Passenger Load Factor
ATF Aviation Turbine Fuel
LFC Low Fare Carriers
DGCA Director General of Civil Aviation