Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN 1343-4500
2013 International Information Institute
Abstract
Wireless Mesh network is a promising technology which has become popular with network
providers providing last mile broadband internet connectivity to the end users. This popularity is due to
the fact that it inter operates well with diverse wireless systems and provides robust fault tolerance with
a high degree of redundancy and reliability. During relaying, Even if some of the mesh nodes die, there
exist many other alternative nodes to serve the end users. In addition, multi-hop WMNs increases the
coverage area. A common problem in WMN is the performance degradation as the network size
increases. This is due to the interference arising from the neighbors and varying traffic load. This is a
critical issue in WMN, which is due to the co channel interference in WMN utilizing individual channel
and singular radio. One of the approaches to increase performance of WMNs is to use multiple channel
multiple radio (MCMR) in each node (mesh router). In this work, a critical issue of performance
degradation in WMN, by incorporating MCMR in WMNs is addressed. This performance has been
evaluated by simulating it in our protocol in OPNET Modeler 17.1 PL1. Simulation results show the
effectiveness of using MCMR.
Key Words: Wireless mesh network, MCMR, Throughput, Packet Delivery Ratio
1. Introduction
IEEE 802.11 Multi Hop Wireless mesh networks (WMNs) [1] are self-forming, selfhealing and self-organizing. Their easy configuration and deployment make them an
economical, reliable and simple solution that can be implemented anywhere at any time. The
end users can use WMN to access the internet by connecting to any of the routers. WMNs
have emerged as a fundamental technology for the next generation of Wireless Networking.
They are formed by mesh routers and mesh clients as shown in Figure 1. WMNs are being
investigated at this moment to support video-related applications such as video streaming,
multimedia messaging, teleconference, voice over IP, and video telemedicine due to its
superior characteristics compared with other wireless standards, including mobility, high
data rate, and low cost infrastructure. They are also being utilized in providing internet
connectivity to rural areas and in disaster management. With such infrastructure in place, a
number of critical medical problems can be addressed with the help of WMNs and the
stability of the infrastructure backbone can be done. In a wireless mesh network, the capacity
is degraded by interference from concurrent wireless transmissions. The Maximum
theoretical capacity in such networks at each node is given by O (1/
achievable capacity is O (1/ n log n )
n) whereas the
random ad-hoc network ideal situations [3]. Through experimentation, it is found that in
IEEE 802.11 [4], which uses a contention-based medium access control the throughput
degrades approximately to, of the raw channel bandwidth [5]. Equation for the achievable
capacity illustrates that throughput capacity of a single channel WMN degrades significantly
as the network size grows. One of the key factors for this rapid degradation is from cochannel interference as the transmission in a single channel WMNs is a half-duplex radio per
node. To minimize co channel interference one of the effective means is to go for multiple
channels and multiple radios (MCMR) for each node. Scheduling approach for CR- WMN.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: In section 2, some recent research
related work in this area has been discussed. Section 3, describes the network model to be
considered for classic WMN. In section 4, Load Balancing Interference Aware Routing
Protocol implemented with the best route discovery algorithm is described.
presents performance evaluation followed by conclusion and future work.
Section 5
2 Related Work
Interference is a key factor in WMNs as the transmissions from one user interferes with
the transmissions and receptions of other users. Due to the interference, the capacity of WMN
is constrained [6]. Researchers have tried to investigate the impact of interference on WMN
through practical scenarios such as
interference not only degrades the performance for single path flow but also for multi path
flows. Due to interference, a high quality video streaming service could not be delivered as a
high percentage of packets were lost. Siraj and Bakar [8] demonstrated the impact of
Interference on Multi-hop Wireless Mesh Network. They showed how the performance is
degraded due to interference.
In [9] a MAC protocol was proposed for resolving channel assignments in connections
going through multiple wireless hops in WMNs by considering interference range issue and
hidden node problems. In [10] an algorithm was proposed, which assigned the same channel
to the two links that were within the vicinity of interference range of each other, which were
a source of co-channel interference resulting in a decrease in network throughput. This
algorithm was based on two-way interference-range edge coloring. In [11] performance
analysis of WMN was done by modeling the maximum throughput per cell and average
system delay of the backbone and the gateways in the WMN. This analysis was based on a
general network model with two key considerations, the random access mechanism in the
MAC and the equivalent queuing network of the backbone. Packet arrival distribution and the
packet departure distribution at the intermediate mesh routers and gateway nodes separately
were analyzed. Maximum throughput per cell and the average packet delivery delay for the
backbone of the WMN was evaluated. The performance study of the influence of the number
of forwarding intermediate and gateway nodes on the system delay at the gateway nodes was
based on this evaluation. In multi-hop networks to improve end to end throughput the per hop
throughput has to be increased which in which in turn depends critically on the number of
simultaneous transmissions that can be achieved in a given network area. This can be
achieved using multiple channels. Nevertheless, with only one radio per node, channel
switching is required. This switching delay grows with the number of channels. For example,
the switching delay for the present 802.11 hardware ranges from a few milliseconds to a few
hundred milliseconds [12]. Such frequent channel switching adversely affects the end-to-end
delay performance of the WMN [13]. Routing in MCMR networks is closely related to
channel assignment [14]. Researchers have studied the problem of routing and channel
assignment in MCMR [15-20]. In [21] the delay and throughput performance of multichannel wireless infrastructure networks was evaluated with ring and grid topologies. Their
analysis is based on the transmission range, interference range and sensing range. In [22] the
capacity of a multi-channel multi-radio wireless networks using linear programming. The
work of [23] was extended to model the throughput gain of network coding in two way, star,
and general network topologies [24]. The authors of [25] examined the queuing delay of a
MCMR WMN under various channel fading conditions.
3. Network Model
An arbitrarily distributed wireless mesh network with n nodes can be defined by a directed
graph, G= (V, E):
Where V is the set of vertices representing nodes of WMN; E is the set of directional edges
representing radio links between the nodes.
Let dij the distance between nodes, i and j, where each node is equipped with radio, which
has: rt transmission range and ri interference range; with constraint ri > rt.
There exists a link {i, j} between node j and k provided.
djk ri
and i j
Thus, the link between two neighbor nodes j and k of WMN is represented by the directed
edge.
{i,j} E
A node j can successfully transmit to node k if the following two conditions are met.
a)
dij rt
(1)
b)
(2)
Fig. 2 shows presence of six nodes in WMN. When node 2 is transmitting and if node 4
wants to transmit it cannot transmit due to (1) and (2). Similarly, nodes 1 and 2 cannot,
whereas node 5 and 6 can, transmit. Fig. 2 also shows that node 4 will cause interference if it
tries to connect. Based on the above approach, an interference graph Gi can be constructed.
An interference graph can be represented by Gi = (Vi, Ei)
The vertex set is identical to the directed graph G representing nodes of WMN.
There
interference, high throughput and low end to end delay. The algorithm is as follows:
ip
5 Performance Evaluation
5.1 Simulation Environment
The performance evaluation of MCMR was done by simulating it with OPNET Modeler 17.1
PL1. MCMR was implemented in the LBIARP protocol and compared with the classic
WMN using Single Channel Single Radio (SCSR). The network topology as shown in Figure
3 was used for simulation. It consists of 16 static mesh routers uniformly randomly placed in
a 4 X 4 grid in a 1000 X 1000m2 area. The average distance between each pair of two one
hop nodes is the same. The interference range is set to be approximately equal as all mesh
routers are with similar transmission powers. The source nodes send Constant Bit rate (CBR)
traffic with UDP as transport protocol, consisting of 512 byte packets with a sending rate of
20 packets/second. The center mesh router was selected as the Gateway node. The following
simulation parameters were used (Table 1)
Value
Network Scenario
Campus Network
Network Grid
1000 X 1000
Number of Nodes
16
Number of radios
Number of Channels
Packet Size
512
Interference range
40 m
Traffic Model
Two ray
Transmission Power
10 mW
50 Kbytes
PHY 802.11g
20 packets/sec
Transmission rate at
54 Mbits/sec
Physical layer
Packet Delivery Ratio: This is the ratio between the number of data packets successfully
received by the destination node and the total number of data packets sent by the source node.
This metric reflects the degree of reliability of the routing protocol.
End-to-end delay of data packets: This is the delay between the time at which the data packet
originated from the source and the time it reaches the destination, and includes all possible
delays caused by queuing for transmission at the node, buffering the packet for a detour,
retransmission delay at the MAC layer, propagation delay and transmission delay. This
metric reflects the quality of routing protocol.
Throughput: This is defined as the amount of data that is transmitted through the network per
unit time (i.e. data bytes delivered to their destinations per second).
it increases the end to end delay. MCMR improved the end to end delay as it balances the
traffic flows and avoids congestion causing less delay.
5.3.3 Throughput
Figure 6 shows throughput comparison between MCMR and SCSR in presence of interfering
traffic arising from the interfering nodes. The throughput in MCMR is greater because SCSR
creates congestion areas. At each hop, there is a delay of data packets. MCMR creates quality
links with fewer delays, which are less loaded. As the number of channels increases, the
throughput increases. The higher the number of channels, the less time spent contending for
the medium to create congestion areas. It is seen that MCMR performs better than SCSR
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This research is supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research, College of Engineering,
King Saud University.
References
[1]
Elsevier Journal of Computer Networks, Vol. 47, No. 4 (2005), pp. 445-487.
[2]
Siraj, M. and Bakar, K.A., Link establishment and performance evaluation in IEEE
802.16 wireless mesh networks. Int. J. Phys. Vol. 6 No.13 (2011), pp. 31893197.
[3]
Gupta, P. and Kumar, P.R., The Capacity of Wireless Networks, IEEE Trans. Inf.
Li, j., Blake, C., Couto, D. S. J. D., Lee, H. I. and Morris, R, Capacity of Ad Hoc
Tragos, E., Fragkiadakis, A., Askoxylakis, I. and Siris, V., "The Impact of
Siraj, M. and Bakar, K.A., To Minimize Interference in Multi Hop Wireless Mesh
Networks Using Load Balancing Interference Aware Protocol, World Applied Sciences
Journal vol.18 number 9 (2012), pp. 1271-1278.
[9]
Yonggyu, K., Jung, D., Kim, Y., Choi S. and Ma, J., Efficient Interference-aware
Channel Allocation in Multi-radio Wireless Mesh Networks, Feb. 19-226, IEEE Xplore
Press, pp.: 920 925. Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), 2012
[10]
Yan, Y., Cai, H. and Seo, S.S., Performance Analysis of IEEE802.11 Wireless Mesh
Zhang, Y, Luo, J. and Hu, H., Wireless Mesh Networking. Auerbach Publications,
2007.
[15]
based Multi-Channel Wireless Mesh Networks, in Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM05, 2005, pp.
22232234.
[16]
Alicherry, M., Bhatia, R. and Li, L., Joint Channel Assignment and Routing for
[17]
Tang, J., Xue, G. and Zhang, W., Interference-aware Topology Control and QoS
Kim, Y., Seo, M., Ji, M. and Ma, J., Novel Interface Failure Tolerant Schemes for
Jeong, H.J., Lee, S., Kim, D., Lim K. and J. Park, Proxy Protocol and PMIPv6
based Mobility Management for IEEE 802.11s Wireless Mesh Networks, International
Journal of INFORMATION, Japan, Vol.15, No.7 (2012), pp.2985-3004.
[20]
Radio Multi-Channel Wireless Mesh Networks, in Proc. of ACM MOBICOM05, 2005, pp.
7387.
[23]
Su, H. and Zhang, X., Modeling Throughput Gain of Network Coding in Multi-
Channel Multi-Radio Wireless Ad Hoc Networks, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. vol. 27, no.
5(2009), pp. 593605,
[24]
Eryilmaz, A., Ozdaglar, A. and Medard, M., On Delay Performance Gains From
Siraj, M. and Bakar, K.A., A Load balancing Interference Aware Routing Metric
(LBIARM) for multi hop wireless Mesh Network, International Journal of the Physical
Sciences, Vol. 7(3) (2012), pp. 456 461.