Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Sponsored by
Introduction
Any company that owns commodities, either through production or merchant activities, needs to know not only the
current value of those commodities based on market prices, but also needs to develop a view of the future value
of those commodities during the time that they are projected to be held in inventory. Additionally, agreements to
purchase commodities in the future must be accounted for, not only at their agreed or projected purchase price,
but also during their anticipated holding period.
that most markets and/exchanges do not exhibit high liquidity in all future periods, it is generally best practice to derive the curve from many
sources of market data including exchanges, broker marks, trader
indications and independent data publishers.
ASSET VALUATION
The second common use of forward curves is in asset valuation for either planning purposes or dynamic hedging. As these valuations are
not part of, or included, in the preparation of financial statement, companies may use something other than exchange-based curves. This is
especially helpful in cases where the operating characteristics of a particular asset are more granular than available market quotes; that is,
they operate in a market or region not directly traded or otherwise well
reflected by an exchange instrument. In this case, using derived curves
would provide the asset holder with a better estimate of the assets current and future value.
With an improved estimate of the assets value, the asset holder
would be in a better position to manage the assets net risk via production or fuels hedging, or operational adjustments to maximize value. However, again, its important to remember that such price curves
would not meet GAAP definitions for input price reliability.
es provide a more nuanced view of firm risk. For these companies, the
use of non-exchange sources, in addition to exchange data, may provide
them with the better fit curves that reflect their operations and risk portfolio.
Regardless of which situation a company finds themselves, best
risk practices dictate that a curve validation process is used in which
independent forward curve data is compared to the forward curves that
they use for financial reporting, risk measurement, and risk reporting.
Companies that utilize forward curves derived from multiple sources, or
with internally-developed adjustments, should enshrine a regular testing
of those curves and adjustments as part of their risk management policies. And most critically, all forward curve information should be archived
indefinitely for audit and compliance purposes.
There are many choices available to market participants seeking
forward curve data sources. The most common sources are exchanges,
brokers, data publishers, data distributors, ETRM system vendors, and internally-developed models. It is important to understand your companys
intended use of any particular forward curve in order to select the appropriate sources and methodologies for deriving those curves. It is also key
to understand the limitations and methodologies inherent in each of the
selected data sources.
Internally modeled curves may be the only option where reliable
market data does not exist (e.g. illiquid points and tenors). In these circumstances, the forward curves quality is highly dependent on the quality of the market data inputs, modeling assumptions and methodology.
Whenever internally modeled curves are used, calibration and back-testing should be done regularly to validate the quality of the curve and its
assumptions. Additionally, when possible, internally developed curves
should be compared to independently modeled curves for further validation.
CURVE VISUALISATION
& ANALYSIS
Working with forward curves can require being interactive. Being able to visualise market dynamics,
can instantly help the business or manager to rapidly
process multiple complex data configurations.
Genic CurveBuilder provides visualisation and
analysis of curves within different curve structure
views and sources and with pre-formed reports and
options.
SUMMARY
Developing and managing forward curves is a challenge in any environment selecting the appropriate data sources that meet your particular curve use
case or application; developing appropriate curve
adjustments to meet your particular market, location
or asset; and ensuring appropriate controls and constant testing can be a complex exercise. However, in
a market that is constantly hammered by economic
uncertainty, rapidly changing supply and demand
patterns, and intense regulatory scrutiny, managing
the complexities associated with curve development
and maintenance becomes even more difficult, and
even more critical.
In this environment, spreadsheets or simplistic
models are insufficient as they are prone to errors
and lack the necessary sophistication to perform the
info@datagenicgroup.com
ABOUT
Commodity
Technology
Advisory
LLC
Commodity Technology Advisory is the leading analyst organization covering the
ETRM and CTRM markets. We provide the invaluable insights into the issues and
trends affecting the users and providers of the technologies that are crucial for
success in the constantly evolving global commodities markets.
Patrick Reames and Gary Vasey head our team, whosecombined 60-plus years in the
energy and commodities markets, provides depth of understanding of the market and
its issues that is unmatched and unrivaled by any analyst group.
For more information, please visit:
www.comtechadvisory.com
ComTech Advisory also hosts the CTRMCenter, your online portal with news and
views about commodity markets and technology as well as acomprehensive online
directory of software and services providers.
Please visit the CTRMCenter at:
www.ctrmcenter.com
19901 Southwest Freeway
Sugar Land TX 77479
+1 281 207 5412
Prague, Czech Republic
+420 775 718 112
ComTechAdvisor y.com
Email: info@comtechadvisor y.com