Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
PROJECT GUIDE:
PROF. SHREEDA SHAH
SUBMITTE
D BY:
NAME
:
Mayur P. Barot
CLASS
S.Y. B.B.A
DIVISION :
NO :
09
SUBMITTED TO:
1|Page
A
ROLL
PREFACE
The financial manager is not in a passive role of scorekeeper
of the accounting information and arranging fund. Whenever
directed to do so he occupies a key position in top
management and plays a dynamic role in solving the complex
management problem, he is how responsible for shaping the
fortunes of enterprise & is involved in The subject matter of
financial management has been changing at a repaid pace about
three decades ago, the scope of financial management was
circumscribed to the raising of fund, whenever needed if
little significance used to be attached to the financial decision
making of problem solving the mid fifties, the emphasis
shifted to wise utilization of fund. The Modern thinking in
financial management gives greater IMPORTANCE TO
MANAGEMENT gives grater importance to management and
decision making policy. Today the most vital management
decision of allocation of capital. The new economic eForms created a challenging environment in the economics.
A number of new tools & techniques have been
developed to meet the needs of modern business that works
in complex environment. A no of old science has been
developed on fresh limes to meet the requirements of modern
business. We as a student management can not keep over
selves isolated from this filed of financial management we
nee to know the practical application of or other theoretical
knowledge so I have prepared a financial report on
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE LIMITED. & have tried to analysis
each report of annual report of three successive year & put it
2|Page
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In our course, as part, we have to prepare financial report on
a company; I have prepared the report on THE COLGATEPALMOLIVE LIMITED
Its my honor to prepare report on Indias no.1 textile
industries. I would like to thank our Prof. Mrs. Shreeda shah who
gave us guidance & enough information to finish our project
easily. I would also like to thank our director sir V.B.Patel for
giving us the opportunity to show our talent in financial field.
Mayur P. Barot
S.Y. B.B.A
DIV.:
ROLL NO:
3|Page
A
09
NO. PARTICULARS
PAGE NO.
1.
2.
COMPANYS BACKGROUND
INTERNATIONAL EXAPATION
COMPANY OVERVIEW
11
DIRECTORS REPORT
13
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
14
AUDIT REPORT
22
RATIO ANALYSIS
26
86
10
BALANCE SHEET
89
11
92
12
96
13
CONCLUSION
100
14
BIBLIOGRAPHY
101
INDEX
4|Page
5|Page
COMPANY BACKGROUND
Name of the company:
COLGATE-PALMOLIVE LTD.
300
New
York,
U.S.A.
Telephone:
Toll
Free:
Fax: (212) 310-2475
Park
New
York
(212)
(800)
Avenue
10022-7499
310-2000
850-2654
Registered office:
Colgate research center,
Main street, hirnandani gardens,
Powai, Mumbai-40056
Factories:
1. Plot. B14/10 MIDC
Waluj industrial Area
Aurangabad-431136
2. Plot no. 78
EPIP phase 1
Jharmajri, baddi
Solan HP-174103
7|Page
D.
Vice-Chairman
R. A.
Deputy Chairman
P. K.
Samuel
Shah
Ghosh
Managing Director
M. V.
Deoras
Whole-time Director
Whole-time Director
M. A. Elias
K. V.
Vaidyanathan
J. K. Setna
V. S. Mehta
Company Secretary:
K. V. Vaidyanathan
Management Committee:
Managing Director M. V. Deoras
Financ e
Legal
M. A. Elias
K. V.
Vaidyanathan
Marketing
8|Page
R. Krishnamurthy
P. K. Ghosh
M. V. Deoras
J. K. Setna
K. V. Vaidyanathan
Auditors:
Price Waterhouse
Chartered Accountants
9|Page
10 | P a g e
International Expansion
Colgate & Company had been a pioneer in establishing
international operations, creating a Canadian subsidiary in 1913
and one in France in 1920. In the early 1920s the firm expanded
into Australia, the United Kingdom, Germany, and Mexico.
Colgate or its successor firm next created subsidiaries in the
Philippines, Brazil, Argentina, and South Africa in the late 1920s.
In 1937 the company moved into India and by the end of the 1940s
had operations in most of South America. By 1939 ColgatePalmolive-Peet's sales hit $100 million.
In the 1940s and 1950s the company also built upon its strategy of
growth by acquisition, buying up a number of smaller consumer
product companies. Organic growth remained on the agenda as
well, and in 1947 the company introduced two of its best-known
products, Fab detergent and Ajax cleanser. These acquisitions and
new products, however, did little to close the gap between Colgate
and its arch-rival, the Procter & Gamble Company, a firm that had
been formed in the 1830s and had by now assumed a commanding
lead over Colgate in selling detergent products in the United States.
Meanwhile, the firm adopted its present name in 1953 and moved
its offices for domestic and international operations to New York
City in 1956.
In 1960 George H. lest was appointed Colgate's president in the
hopes that his international experience would produce similar
success in the domestic market. Under his leadership, the company
embarked upon an extensive new product development program
that created such brands as Cold Power laundry detergent,
Palmolive dishwashing liquid, and Ultra Bite toothpaste. In an
attempt to expand beyond these traditional, highly competitive
businesses into new growth areas, Colgate also successfully
introduced a new food wrap called Baggies in 1963. As a result of
these product launches, the company's sales grew between 8 and 9
percent every year throughout the 1960s. Sales topped the $1
11 | P a g e
12 | P a g e
13 | P a g e
Colgate was also rated as the number one brand by the A&M
MODE Annual Survey for Indias Top Brands for eight out of nine years
during the period 1992 to 2001.
14 | P a g e
DIRECTORS REPORT
Financial Results
(Rs. Crore)
2009-10 2008-09
Total Revenue
Sales(Excluding Excise Duty)
Other Income
Profit before Taxation
Provision for Taxation
Profit after Taxation
Balance brought forward
Profit
available
for
appropriation
Appropriation
Dividend
Dividend Tax
General Tax
Balance carried forward
15 | P a g e
2,060.92
1,962.46
98.46
484.80
61.54
423.26
28.84
452.10
271.98
45.84
42.33
91.45
452.10
1,802.57
1,694.81
107.76
345.31
55.09
290.22
5.77
295.99
203.99
34.14
29.02
28.84
295.99
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE
Your Companys strong performance continued in 2009-10
despite difficult economic conditions. In a year marked by volatile
financial and growth during the year 2009-10. Sales for the year
increased by 16 per cent at Rs. 1,962 crore during the previous
year. The toothpaste business registered an impressive volume
growth of 14 per cent during the year.
The profit after tax for the financial year 2009-10 grew by an
impressive 46 per cent to Rs. 423 crore as against Rs. 290 rore in
the previous year.
The underlying performance can be gauged from the following
ratios:
2009-10
2008-09
Eamings per share (Rs.)
31.1
21.3
currency markets. Your Company achieved a healthy double
digit Sales
Dividend per share (Rs.)
20.0
15.0
Return on Capital Employed (%)
156.9
155.0
During the year generation continued to be very strong arising
from significant improvements in the business performance,
efficiencies and cost saving across the organization and a
continued efficient collection system. Your Company managed
investments prudently by deployment of surplus funds after
ensuring that such investments satisfy the Companys criteria of
safety and liquidity.
Your Companys market shares are improving steadily. These
it creases are driven by our strong focus on understanding our
consumers, working with our retail customers. Your Company also
continued to focus on driving innovation throughout all areas of
business, increasing effectiveness and efficiency everywhere and
strengthening the leadership competency of the team. The sharp
focus on these four clearly defined strategy initiative, helped your
Company continue to maintain its leadership position in the oral
care market.
16 | P a g e
17 | P a g e
1. Dividend
The Companys strong cash generation and positive
growth momentum led your Board to declare three interim
dividends of Rs. 7 and Rs. 5 per share aggregating Rs.20 per share
for the financial year 2009-10 as against Rs.15 per share in the
previous year-a 33 per cent increase. These dividends were paid on
September 4 and December 28, 2009 and April 23,2010. Having
declared three interim dividends, your Board has not recommended
a final dividend for the financial year 2009-10.
2. Responsibility Statement
Pursuant to Section 217(2AA) of the Companies Act, 1956 the
Directors based on the representations received from the Operating
Management confirm:
a) That in the preparation of the annual accounts,
the applicable accounting standards have been
followed and that no material departures have
been made from the same,
b)That they in selection of the accounting policies
consulted the statutory auditors and have
applied them consistently and made judgments
and estimates that are reasonable and p....... so
as to give a true and fair view of the state of
affairs of the Company at the end of the financial
year and of the profit of the Company for that
period,
c) That to the best of their knowledge and
information. They have taken proper and
sufficient care for the maintenance of adequate
accounting records in accordance with the
provisions of the Companies Act.1956 for
18 | P a g e
3. Subsidiary Companies
Your Company was holding 75 per cent shareholding in
Processional Oral Care Products Private Limited at Goa (POC)
engaged manufacture of toothpaste. During the year, Company
acquired the remaining 25 per cent shareholding at a total
consideration of Rs.2.40 crore and proposed Amalgamation of
POC with your Company. The Scheme of Amalgamation of POC
with your Company was sanctioned by the Bombay High Court at
Goa vide its order dated April 16, 2010 with retrospective effect
from April 1, 2009. Being the Appointed Date under the Scheme of
Amalgamation.
Your Company was also holding 75per cent of the shareholding in
CC Health Care Products Private Limited at Hyderabad (CCHL)
engaged in the manufacture of toothpowder. During the year your
Company acquired the remaining 25 per cent shareholding at a
total consideration of Rs.69.07 laces and initiated steps before the
Andhra Pradesh High Court for amalgamation of CCHL with your
Company effective from April 1, 2009, being the Appointed Date
under the Scheme of Amalgamation.
The amalgamation of subsidiaries is primarily designed to simplify
the corporate structure and no material impact either in terms of
operations or in terms of capital structure of the Company.
20 | P a g e
5. Corporate Governance
A separate report on Corporate Governance along with the
Auditors certificate on its compliance is attached as Annexure 1 to
this Report.
6. Employee Relations
The employee relations in the Company continued to be
positive. During the year, a productivity-linked long-term
settlement was signed with the Aurangabad Factory Union through
a process of bilateral negotiations.
Information as per Section 217(2A) of the Companies Act, 1956
(the Act) read with the Companies (Particular of Employees)
Rules , 1975 forms part of this Report. As per the provisions of
Section 219(1)(b)(iv) of the Act, the Report and Accounts are
being sent to the shareholders of the Company excluding the
statement on particulars of employees under Section 217(2A) of
the Act. Any shareholder interested in obtaining the copy of said
statement may write to the Secretarial Department at the
Registered Office of the Company.
7. Trade Relations
Wish to record appreciation of the continued unstinted
support and co-operation from its Your Directors retailers,
stockiest, suppliers of goods/services, clearing and forwarding
agents and all others associated with it. Your Company will
continue to build and maintain strong links with its business
partners.
21 | P a g e
9. Directors
Effective February 1, 2010 Mr. Mukul Deoras was
appointed as the Managing Director of the Company to succeed
Mr. Roger Calmeyer, who stepped down as the Managing Director
of the Company effective January 31, 2010 to retire from the
services of the Corporation. The appointment of Mr. Deoras is
subject to the approval of the shareholders and the Central
Government under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.
The Board places on record their appreciation for the
distinguished services rendered by Mr. Calmeyer during his tenure
with the Company.
Effective April 1, 2010 Mr. Derrick Samuel has been appointed as
Director and Chairman of the Board to succeed Mr. Justin skala,
who has stepped down to head the Latin America Division of the
Corporation. The Board, while welcoming Mr. Samuel, places on
record their appreciation for the distinguished services rendered by
Mr. Skala during his tenure with the Company.
Under Article 124 of the Companys Articles of
Association, Mr. P.k. Ghosh and Mr. M.A. Elias retire by rotation
22 | P a g e
10. AUDITORS
Messrs. Price Waterhouse, Chartered Accountants, retire and
eligible for re-appointment as Auditors.
11. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Your Directors sincerely appreciate the high degree of
professionalism, commitment and dedication displayed by
employees at all levels. The Directors also wits to place on
record their gratitude to the Members for their continued
support and confidence.
23 | P a g e
1. We have audited the attached Balance Sheet of ColgatePalmolive ( India) Limited ( the Company) as at March 31,2010
and related Profit and Loss Account and Cash Flow Statement for
the year ended on that date annexed thereto, which we have signed
under reference to this report . These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys Management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audit.
2. We conducted our audit in accordance with the auditing
standards generally accepted in India. Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amount and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by Management. as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides
a reasonable basis for our opinion.
3. As required by the companies (Auditors Report) Order, 2003.
As amended by the companies (Auditors Report) (Amendment)
Order, 2004 (together the Order). Issued by the Central
Government of India in terms of sub section (4A) of Section 227
of the Companies Act, 1956 of India (the Act) and on the basis
of such checks of the books and records of the Company as we
considered appropriate and according to the information and
explanations given to us, we give in the Annexure a statement on
the matters specified in paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Order.
4.
25 | P a g e
(iii) In the case of the Cash Flow statement, of the cash flows
for the year
ended on that date
For price Waterhouse
Firm Registration No.301112E
Chartered Accountant
Partha Ghosh
Partner
27 | P a g e
1)
3)
Ratio analysis
helpful the outsider like creditor, share holder, debenture holder,
bankers to know about the profitability and ability of the firm to
pay them interest, dividend, etc.
4)
With
the help of ratio analysis, the company may have comparative
study of its performance to the previous years. In this way
company comes to know about its weak point and able to improve
them.
5)
30 | P a g e
Accounting
ratios are very useful as they briefly summaries the result of detail
and complicated calculation.
6)
Ratio analysis
helps to know the short term financial position (liquidity position)
of the company with the help of liquidity ratio. In case short term
financial position is not good, effort are made to improve it.
8)
31 | P a g e
FALES RESULT:
2)
LIMITED COMPAREBILIYT:
Difference firm
apply difference accounting policy. Therefore the ratio of one firm
can not always be compared with the ratio of other firm. Some
firm may value the closing stock on first into bases while some
other firm similarly there may be difference in providing
deprecation on fixed assets on certain provision also.
3)
The
prize level changes often make the comparison difficult over a
period of time. Changes in prize affect the cost of production, sales
and also the value of assets. Therefore it is necessary to make
proper adjustment for prize level changes before any comparison.
4)
Ratio
analysis is technique of quantitative analysis and thus ignores
qualitative factors which may be important in decision making.
E.G.: Average collection period may be equal to standard credit
period but some debtors may be in the list of doubtful debt, which
is not disclosed while, ratio analysis.
5)
In order to cover-up
their bed financial position. Some companies use window dressing.
The main record the accounting data according to the conventions
to show the financial position of the company in a better way
costly teach.
33 | P a g e
6)
COSTLY TECHNIQUE:
ABSENCE OF DATA:
In the absence of absolute data, the result may be
misaligning. E.G: the gross profit of two firms is 25% where the
profit earned by one firm is just Rs: 5000 & sales are Rs: 20000.
Profit earned by other firm is Rs: 10, 00,000 and sales Rs: 40,
00,000 even the profit of the firm is same but the magnitude of
their business is guide different.
8)
ABSENCE
OF STANDERED UNIVERSITY
ACCEPTED TERMINOLOGY:
There are no standard ratios, which are
universally accepted for cooperation purpose. As, such the
significance of ratio analysis techniques is reduce.
34 | P a g e
Classification of ratio:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Liquidity Ratio
Profitability Ratio
Leverage Ratio
Activity or Efficiency Ratio
Coverage Ratio
1.
Liquid Ratio
a.
b.
Current Ratio
Liquid Ratio
2.
Profitability Ratio
A.
a.
b.
In Relation To Sales
Gross Profit Ratio
Net Profit Ratio
35 | P a g e
c.
d.
Operating Ratio
Expenses Ratio
36 | P a g e
B.
In Relation To Investment
a.
b.
C.
a.
b.
c.
d.
3.
Leverage Ratio
a.
b.
c.
d.
5. Coverage Ratio
a.
b.
37 | P a g e
(in lacs)
Calculation: Year
Gross profit
Net sales
Gross profit ratio
39 | P a g e
2007-08
84060.25
147337.90
57.05%
2008-09
95350.59
169481.35
56.26%
2009-10
118561.63
196245.92
60.41%
Interpretation: Here gross profit ratio decreased in 2008-09.which shows efficient use
of raw material and there is decrease in manufacturing expenses. It means
that a low ratio suggests that the firm is not able to buy at reasonable prices
or that the cost of production is not under control. The firm has to work
better for it and reduce its cost of production.
expressed as under:
(in laces)
Calculation: Year
Net profit
Net sales
Net profit ratio
2007-08
23171.02
147337.90
15.73%
2008-09
29021.94
169481.35
17.12%
2009-10
42325.82
196245.92
21.57%
Interpretation: Here in the three years the net profit ratio of the company shows
downward trend. It shows profitability of firm and management of the firm
is not efficient this suggest that company is not satisfactory position and can
be harmful for the company.
This ratio indicates
A. An average net margin earned on a sale of Rs.100.
42 | P a g e
3. Return
on Capital Employee :
Meaning:
This ratio measures a relationship between net profit before
interest & tax and capital employed.
Objective:
The objective of calculating this ratio is to find out how
efficiently the long term fund supplied by the creditors & shareholders has
been used.
Components:
There are two Components of this ratio which are as under:
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by dividing the net profit before
interest & tax by capital employed. This is expressed as percentage. In the
form of a formula this ratio may be expressed as under:
(in lacs)
Year
Net profit(BIT)
Cap employed
Returns
44 | P a g e
2007-08
29204.91
16220.62
180.05%
2008-09
34530.65
21629.57
159.65%
2009-10
48479.85
32611.16
148.66%
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates the ability of the firm to generate profit per rupee
on capital employed. Higher the ratio the more efficient the management &
utilization of capital employed.
4.
Meaning:
The ratio measures the relationship between net profit after
interest, tax & shareholders fund.
Objective:
The objective of computing this ratio is to find out how
efficiently the fund invested by the shareholders has been used.
Components:
There are two components of this ratio as under:
1. Net Profit after Interest & Tax (PAT)
2. Shareholders Fund which mean
Equity share capital
+ Preference share capital
+ Reserves & surplus
45 | P a g e
(in lacs)
Year
Net profit(PAT)
Shareholders fund
Returns
2007-08
23171.02
16220.62
142.85%
2008-09
29021.94
21629.57
134.18%
2009-10
42325.82
32611.16
129.79%
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates the firms ability to generating profit per
rupee of shareholders fund. Higher the ratio the more efficient funds.
46 | P a g e
5. Return
on EquitShareholders
Fund :
Meaning:
This ratio measures a relationship between net profit after interest,
tax and preference dividend and equity shareholders funds.
Objective:
The objective of computing this ratio is to find out how efficiently
the funds supplied by the equity shareholders have been used.
Components:
There are two components of this ratio they are as under:
1. Net Profit after Interest, Tax & Preference dividend
2. Equity Shareholders Fund which means
Equity Share Capital
+ Reserves & Surplus
+ P&L A/c Credit Balance
Fictitious Assets
47 | P a g e
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by dividing the net profit after interest
& tax and preference dividend by equity shareholders fund. It is expressed
as percentage. In the form of a formula this ratio may be expressed as under:
(in lacs)
Calculation:
Year
Net profit(PAT)
Eq. Shareholders fund
Returns
2007-08
23171.02
16220.62
142.85%
2008-09
29021.94
21629.57
134.18%
2009-10
42325.82
32611.16
129.79%
Interpretation:
Return on equity share holder fund was 36.55%in 2006-07
which increased 40.41% and again decreased to 33.11% it indicates that
fund which is provided by the owners have been not used properly by the
firm which can be unsatisfactory for the company in the future.
48 | P a g e
6. Operating
Ratio :
Meaning:
This ratio measures a relationship between operating cost and net
sales.
Objective:
The main objective of computing this ratio is to determined the
operational efficiency with which production or purchase & selling
operations are carried on.
Components:
There are two components of this ratio which are as under:
1. Operating cost consisting two element
A. Cost of Goods Sold
B. Other Operating expenses
Ex. Administrative expenses, selling & distribution expenses,
interest on short term loans, discount allowed and bed debts,
net sales (Gross Sales Sales Return)
2. Net Sales
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by dividing the operating cost by net
49 | P a g e
(in lacs)
Year
2007-08
2008-09
2009-10
COGS
63277.65
74130.76
77684.29
Operating exp
33152.65
36313.73
40310.73
Net sales
147337.90
169481.35
196245.92
Operating ratio
65.45%
65.17%
60.13%
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates an average operating cost incurred on sales of
goods worth Rs. 100. Lower the ratio, greater is the operating profit to cover
the operating expense to pay dividend and to create reserves & vice-versa.
50 | P a g e
7. Expenses
Ratio:
Meaning:
This ratio measures the relationship between different types of
ratio with expenses & net sales.
Objective:
The main objective of computing different types of expenses
ratio is the efficiency or otherwise the incurrence of different types of
expenses.
Components:
There are two components of this ratio which are as under:
1. Different type of expenses
2. Net Sales
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by dividing different types of expenses
by the net sales. This ratio is expressed as a percentage. In the form of a
formula this ratio may be expressed as under:
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates an average expenses incurred on sales of goods
worth Rs.100. Lower the ratio, greater is the operating profit to cover
51 | P a g e
operating expenses, to pay dividend and to create reserves & surplus & viceversa
8. EARNING
Meaning:
This ratio measures the earnings available to an equity
shareholder on a per share basis.
Objective:
The objective of calculative this ratio is to find out the
profitability of the firm on per equity share basis.
Components:
There are two components of this ratio which are as under:
1. Net Profit after Interest, Tax & Preference dividend
2. No. of equity Shares
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by regarding the net profit after
interest, tax and preference dividend by the no. of equity shares. It is
expressed as absolute figure. In the form of a formula this ratio may be
expressed as under:
52 | P a g e
(in lacs)
Year
NP-pref. share
No. of eq. share
Earning per share (Rs.)
2007-08
23171.02
1359.93
17.04
2008-09
29021.94
1359.93
21.34
2009-10
42325.82
1359.93
31.12
Interpretation:
In general, higher the ratio the better it is and vice-versa.
While interpreting this ratio, it must be seen whether there is any increase in
equity shareholders fund as a result of retained earning without any change
in no. of outstanding shares.
53 | P a g e
9. DIVIDEND
PER SHARE
Meaning:
This ratio measures relationship between dividend and no. of
equity shares.
Objective:
The objective of calculating this ratio is to find out net
distributed profit after interest, tax and preference dividend to equity
shareholders.
Components:
There are two components of this ratio which are as under:
1. Dividend paid to equity shareholders
2. No. of equity shares
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by dividing dividend paid to equity
shareholders by no. of equity shares. It is expressed as absolute figure. In the
form of a formula this ratio can be expressed as under:
54 | P a g e
(in lacs)
Year
Total dividend declared
No. of share
Dividend per share (Rs.)
2007-08
17679.07
1359.93
13
2008-09
20398.92
1359.93
15
2009-10
27198.57
1359.93
20
Interpretation:
In general higher the ratio the better it is and vice-versa.
55 | P a g e
10.
Meaning:
This ratio measures relationship between market value of equity
shares & earning per share.
Objective:
The objective of computing this ratio is to find out expected
return on investment in equity shares.
Components:
There are two components of this ratio which are as under:
1. Market price per equity share
2. Earnings per share
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by dividing market price per equity
share by earning per share. It is expressed has an absolute this figure. In the
form of a formula this ratio may be expressed as under:
56 | P a g e
(in lacs)
Year
Market price
Earning per share
Price earning ratio (P/E Ratio)
2007-08
10
17.04
0.59
2008-09
10
21.34
0.47
2009-10
10
31.12
0.32
57 | P a g e
58 | P a g e
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by dividing the current assets by current
liabilities. This ratio is usually express as under.
59 | P a g e
(in lacs)
Year
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Current Ratio
2007-08
40168.55
53420.09
0.75 : 1
2008-09
54210.29
55573.32
0.97 : 1
2009-10
59013.45
55147.30
1.07 : 1
Interpretation: Current ratio of the firm has remained all most constant around as it has kept
constant trend. The company has satisfactory current assets for its future
need. Current assets are more than current liabilities. It means company can
utilized properly current assets. The ideal ratio is 2:1
60 | P a g e
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates as of current assets available for each rupee of
current liability. Higher the ratio, greater the margin of safety for short term
creditors & vise-versa. Traditionally a current ratio of 2:1 is considered to be
a satisfactory ratio on the basis of this traditional rule if the current ratio is 2
or more it means the firm is adequately liquid and has the ability to meet its
current obligation, if the current ratio is less than 2 it means the firm has
difficulty in meeting its current obligation.
Objective:
The objective of calculating this ratio is to find out the ability of
the firm to meet its short term obligations as and when due without relying
upon the realization of stock.
Components:
There are two components of this ratio which are as under:
1. Quick assets/Liquid assets:
Which means those assets which can be
converted into cash immediately an include the following
Cash balance, Marketable securities, Bills receivable, Bank balance,
Debtors, Short term loan and advances or
Quick Assets =Current Assets Stocks
2. Liquid Liabilities which include all current excepted bank over
draft i.e.
Liquid Liabilities = Current liabilities Bank over Draft
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by dividing by the liquid assets by
liquid liabilities. This ratio is usually express as a pure ratio.
(in lacs)
Calculation: Year
Liquid assets
Liquid liabilities
Liquid ratio
62 | P a g e
2007-08
32604.7
34693.43
0.94:1
2008-09
45967.96
39454.14
1.17:1
2008-09
47958.09
42665.43
1.12:1
Interpretation:
As per above data we show that in 2008 &2009 there is a access of
Liability than assets so ratio is lower in this year. In 2010 there is a
Increase in total liquid asset than ratio is lower @ 1.12:1
63 | P a g e
Introduction:
This ratio measures the effectiveness with which a firm uses
its available resources. These ratios are also called turnover ratios since they
indicate the speed with which the resources are converted in to sales.
Usually the following activity ratios are calculated.
64 | P a g e
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by dividing the cost of goods sold by
average stock. This ratio is usually expressed as number of times. In the
formula this ratio may be express as under.
66 | P a g e
(in lacs)
Calculation: Year
Cost of goods sold
Average Stock
Stock turnover ratio (times)
2007-08
63277.65
3549.275
17.83
2008-09
74130.76
3884.525
19.08
2009-10
77684.29
4546.54
17.09
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates the speed with which inventory is converted in to
sales. A high ratio indicates efficient performance. In the other hand a too
low ratio may be the result of excessive inventory. To judge whether the
ratio is satisfactory or not, it should be compared with its own past ratio.
67 | P a g e
working capital. This ratio is usually expressed as no. of times. In the form
of a formula this ratio may be expressed as under.
(in lacs)
Year
Net sales
Working capital
WCT
2007-08
147337.90
13251.54
11.12
2008-09
169481.35
1363.03
124.34
2008-10
196245.92
3866.15
50.75
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates the firms ability to generate sales per
rupee of working capital. In general, higher the ratio, the more efficient the
management & utilization of working capital and vice-versa. In the year
69 | P a g e
2008
Firms WC is @ lover level. The level was increase in 2009 @ a pick to 124
Reached down in 2010 @50
(in lacs)
Year
2007-08
SALES
147337.30
Total assets
16689.37
Total assets turnover
2008-09
169481.35
22098.32
2009-10
196245.92
33069.91
ratio
7.67
5.93
8.83
Interpretation:
An ideal total assets turnover ratio is 2:1 i.e. Amount of
sales are double than total assets. A lower ratio than the ideal ratio shows
that the assets are not utilized properly. Here in the firms asset turn over
Ratio is decreasing per year. In 2007 its a8.83 than decrease in current year
Is 5.93i.e. 2%
71 | P a g e
Components:
There are two components of this ratio. They are as under
1. Debtors and Bills receivable
2. Net Credit Sales
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by dividing debtors and bills
receivables by net credit sales. This ratio is usually expressed as no. of days.
72 | P a g e
(in lacs)
Year
Debtors + B\R
Credit sales
Debtors ratio
2007-08
918.55
147337.90
2.28days
2008-09
1113.45
169481.35
2.40 days
2009-10
976.88
196245.92
1.87days
Interpretation:
This ratio shows average collection period for credit sales.
In other words it can be said that the time period given to debtors to pay
their payments can be known by this ratio. This ratio is also known as
Debtors velocity.
73 | P a g e
Objective:
The objective of computing this ratio is to find out the proportion of
share capital & reserves & surplus with no. of equity shares.
Components:
There are two components of this ratio
1. Equity share capital & reserves and surplus
2. No. of equity shares
Calculation:
This ratio is computed by dividing equity share capital & reserves &
surplus by no. of equity shares. It is expressed as an absolute figure.
74 | P a g e
(in lacs)
Year
Eq. shares
Reserves & surplus
No. of eq shares
Book value per share
2007-08
1359.93
14860.69
1359.93
11.93
2008-09
95.92
832.58
95.92
9.68:1
2009-10
95.92
998.55
95.92
11.4:1
Interpretation:
In general higher the ratio better it is because this ratio measures
relationship between share capital and reserves & surplus with no. of equity
shares. In the most of the companies the amount of equity share capital
remains constant & the value of reserves & surplus charges. Whenever
company has high amount of profits, the value of reserves & surplus will
increase. Therefore higher book value per share means high amount of
profitability. The book value per share is tend to increasing tend of the firm
75 | P a g e
76 | P a g e
2007-08
267.33
1374.94
71
2008-09
375.73
1593.65
86
2009-10
375.5
2119.93
62
Interpretation: This ratio of the firm has decreased in 2 years from 71 in 2006-07
to 62 in 2008-09. It shows the bad position of the company and company
cannot collect debt easily which can be a loss to the firm.
This ratio shows an average time period for which the credit purchase
remain outstanding or the average credit period allowed by the creditors.
This ratio is also known as Debt Payment period or Creditors Velocity
77 | P a g e
Meaning:
Capital structure of a company consist of a verity of securities
Ex. Equity share & preference share which satisfy its share capital
requirements while by other securities such as debentures, warrants etc. the
company satisfies its access requirement of long term capital & borrowed
capital, leverage ratios are calculated. Sum of the leverage ratios are as
under.
1. Debt equity ratio
2. Proprietary ratio
3. Capital Gearing ratio
4. Long term funds to fixed assets ratio
Objective:
The objective of computing this ratio is to find out the relative
proportion of debt & equity in financing the assets of a firm.
Components:
There are two components of this ratio which are as under:
1. Long term debt which means all types of secured and unsecured
loans.
Ex. Debtors, Loans from financial institution
2. Shareholders funds which means equity share capital + Preference
share capital + Reserves & surplus Fictitious Assets
Calculation:
This ratio is calculated by dividing the long term debts of the firm by
shareholders fund. This ratio is usually expressed as a pure ratio.
Ex. 2:1
80 | P a g e
2007-08
468.75
16220.65
.029:1
2008-09
468.75
21629.57
.022:1
2009-10
468.75
32611.16
.014:1
Interpretation:
This ratio indicates the margin of safety to long term creditors.
Lower ratio means a larger safety margin for creditors & vice-versa. Here in
the firm this ratio indicates towards lower level which shows firm had larger
safety for creditors. It is better condition for firm
81 | P a g e
82 | P a g e
2007-08
16220.62
16689.37
97.19%
2008-09
21629.57
22098.32
97.88%
2009-10
32611.16
33669.91
98.61%
Interpretation: Proprietary ratio shows 2007-08 an upward move and after in year
2008-09 also towards a top. Ratio was @ pick in2010@98.61%. Then firm
has a strong owners fund than the assets of the firm
83 | P a g e
84 | P a g e
(in lacs)
Calculation: Year
Long term funds
Fixed assets
Long term funds to fixed ratio
2007-08
1828.68
19899.42
0.09:1
2008-09
1828.68
17859.64
0.10:1
2008-09
1828.68
25313.66
0.07:1
Interpretation: Long-term ratio decreased from 2.84 to 1.91. It has shown fall in the
ratio. The fixed assets should always be acquired out of long-term funds,
meaning thereby that this ratio should not be less than 100. The company
has not achieved a good ratio as it shows a downward trend.
(in lacs)
2007-08
155321.10
7983.20
147337.90
8478.12
63277.65
11827.68
49521.29
1984.49
5824.66
215.77
425.00
2486.96
8159.57
9519.50
5084.64
2317.10
577.17
(in lacs)
PARTICULARS
INCOME
Gross sales
Less: Excise duty
Net sales
Other income
EXPENDITURE
Cost of Goods sold
Employee Costs
Other Expenses
Depreciation/Amortization/Impairment
PROFIT FOR THEYEAR BEFORE TAX
Provision for taxation
Current
Deferred
Fringe benefit
PROFIT AFTER TAX
Balance of profit brought forward
Balance available for appropriation
APPROPRIATION
First Interim Dividend
Second Interim Dividend
Final Dividend Proposed
Dividend Tax
Transfer to General Reserve
BALANCE CARRIED TO BALANCE SHEET
87 | P a g e
2008-09
175815.90
6334..55
169481.35
10775.72
74130.76
14340.65
54960.12
2294.89
4107.50
1031.21
370.00
577.17
12239.35
8159.57
9519.50
3414.02
2902.19
2883.98
(in lacs)
2009-10
202464.65
6218.73
196245.92
9845.72
77684.29
15907.35
60263.36
3756.79
157611.79
6430.80
276.77
2883.98
10879.43
9519.50
6799.64
4583.67
4232.58
9194.98
SOURCES OF FUNDS
SHAREHOLDERS FUNDS
Share capital
Reserve and surplus
LOAN FUNDS
Unsecured loans
Total
APPLICATION OF FUNDS
FIXED ASSETS
Gross block
Less : depreciation
Net block
Capital work in progress and
Advances for Capital Expenditure
INVESTMENTS
CURRENT ASSETS, AND LOANS
AND ADVANCES
Inventories
sundry debtors
Cash and bank balances
Interest Accrued on Investments
Loans and advances
LESS :CURRENT LIABILITY AND
PROVISIONS
Current liability
Provisions
NET CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL
2007-08
TOTAL
1359.93
14860.69
16220.62
468.75
16689.37
44959.43
25818.85
19140.58
758.84
19899.42
7258.77
7563.85
918.55
14426.28
264.20
16995.67
34693.43
18726.66
13251.54
16689.37
SOURCES OF FUNDS
SHAREHOLDERS FUNDS
Share capital
Reserve and surplus
LOAN FUNDS
Unsecured loans
Total
APPLICATION OF FUNDS
FIXED ASSETS
Gross block
Less : depreciation
Net block
Capital work in progress and
Advances for Capital Expenditure
INVESTMENTS
CURRENT ASSETS, AND LOANS
AND ADVANCES
Inventories
sundry debtors
Cash and bank balances
Interest Accrued on Investments
Loans and advances
LESS :CURRENT LIABILITY AND
PROVISIONS
Current liability
Provisions
NET CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL
2008-09
TOTAL
1359.93
20269.64
21629.57
468.75
22098.32
42525.56
25132.76
17392.80
466.84
17859.64
3832.89
8242.33
1113.45
25114.33
718.76
10021.42
39454.14
16119.18
1363.03
22098.32
SOURCES OF FUNDS
SHAREHOLDERS FUNDS
Share capital
Reserve and surplus
LOAN FUNDS
Unsecured loans
Total
2009-10
TOTAL
1359.93
31251.23
32611.16
458.75
33069.91
APPLICATION OF FUNDS
FIXED ASSETS
Gross block
53452.15
Less : depreciation
28757.37
Net block
24694.78
Capital work in progress and
Advances for Capital Expenditure
618.88
INVESTMENTS
CURRENT ASSETS, AND LOANS
AND ADVANCES
Inventories
sundry debtors
Cash and bank balances
Interest Accrued on Investments
Loans and advances
LESS :CURRENT LIABILITY AND
PROVISIONS
Current liability
Provisions
NET CURRENT ASSETS
TOTAL
25313.66
2100.07
1105536
976.88
34758.44
548.34
11674.43
4265.43
12481.87
3866.15
33069.91
(Rs. lacs)
Particular
Income:
2007-08
Rs.
155321.1
Gross sale
0
Less: Excise duty 7983.20
147337.9
Net sales
0
Other income 8478.12
155816.0
Total
2
%
105.41
5.41
100
5.75
105.75
2008-09
Rs.
175815.9
0
6334.55
169481.3
5
10775.72
180257.0
7
2009-10
%
103.73
3.73
100
6.35
106.35
%
202464.6
5
6218.73
196245.9
2
9845.72
206091.6
4
103.17
3.16
100
5.01
105.01
Expenditure:
63277.65
11827.68
49521.29
1984.49
126611.1
1
42.94
8.02
33.61
1.34
Current tax
Deferred tax
COGS.
Employee costs
Other expenses
Depreciation
Total
43.73
8.46
32.42
1.35
85.93
74130.76
14340.65
54960.12
2294.89
145726.4
2
39.58
85.98
77684.29
15907.35
60263.36
3756.79
157611.7
9
5824.66
3.95
4107.50
2.42
6430.80
3.27
(215.77)
0.14
1031.21
0.60
(276.77)
0.14
0.28
370.00
0.21
1.68
577.17
0.34
2883.98
1.46
5.53
12239.35 7.22
8159.57 4.81
8.10
30.71
1.91
80.31
Provision for
taxation
8159.57
-
10879.43 5.54
9519.50 4.85
dividend
final proposed
dividend
9519.50
6.46
6799.64
3.46
Tax on dividend
5084.64
3.45
3414.02
2.01
4583.67
2.33
Transfer to
general reserve
2317.10
1.57
2902.19
1.71
4232.58
2.15
577.17
0.37
2883.98
1.70
9194.98
4.68
Balance caring
forward
(Rs. In Lacs)
2007-08
Particular
SOURCES OF FUNDS
[A] Shareholders fund
Share Capital
Reserves & Surplus
Rs.
1359.93
14860.69
8.14
89.04
468.75
Gross block
Less: Depreciation
Net block
Capital work in
progress and advances for
2009-10
Rs.
1359.93 6.15
20269.64 91.72
1359.93
31251.23
4.11
94.50
2.80
468.75
458.75
1.38
44959.43
25818.85
19140.58
269.38
154.70
114.68
42525.56 192.43
25132.76 113.73
17392.80 78.70
53452.15
28757.37
24694.78
161.63
86.95
74.67
Capital expenditure
758.84
4.54
466.84
618.88
1.87
[B] Investments
[C]Deferred tax assets
[C] Current assets, Loan
7258.77
2782.72
43.49
16.67
17859.64 80.81
3832.89 17.34
2100.07
1790.03
6.35
5.41
Rs.
2008-09
2.12
APPLICATION OF FUND
[A] Fixed assets
94 | P a g e
2.11
7563.85
918.55
14426..28
45.32
5.50
86.43
8242.33 37.29
1113.45 5.03
25114.33 113.64
11055.36
976.88
34758.44
33.43
2.95
105.10
264.20
16995.67
1.58
101.83
718.76
3.25
10021.42 86.07
548.34
11674.43
1.65
35.30
207.87
112.20
39454.14 178.53
16119.18 72.94
42665.43
12481.87
129.01
37.74
3866.15
11..69
33069.91
100
And advances
Inventories
Sundry Debtors
Cash & bank balance
Interest accrued on
investment.
Loan& advances
Less: Current liability and
provisions
34693.43
Current Liabilities
18726.66
Provisions
[D]Net current assets
13251.54
79.40
1363.03
TOTAL
16689.37
100
22098.32 100
95 | P a g e
0.06
CASHFLOW STATEMENT:
Particulars
Cash flow from
Operating
Activities:
Net Profit before
tax
Adjustment for:
Unrealized
Foreign exchange
Loss (Net)
Depreciation
Reversal of
diminution in
value of invt.
Interest expenses
Profit on sale of
fixed assets
Interest income
Dividend from
subsidiaries
Gain on maturity
of Investments
Operating profit
before working
capital changes
96 | P a g e
2008-09(Rs. 2007Lacs)
08(Rs.
Lacs)
200607(rs.lacs)
34530.65
29204.91
20160.59
875.44
23.19
22.07
2294.89
-
1984.49
(750.00)
1525.59
110.01
(980.54)
143.51
(83.70)
98.04
(847.43)
(3136.57)
(397.56)
(2144.87)
-
(1680.75
196.56
(39.13)
33257.19
28377.53
19081.75
Adjustment for
increase/decrease
in Working
capital
Inventories
Sundry Debtors
Loans and
Advances
Current liabilities
and provisions
Cash generated
from operations
Direct taxes paid
Net cash from
operating
activities (A)
Cash flow from
Investing
activities:
Purchase of fixed
assets
Sale of fixed
assets
Sale of
investments in
subsidiaries (Net)
Sale of other invt.
Capital
Repatriation by
Wholly-Owned
subsidiary
Inter corporate
97 | P a g e
(420.74)
(194.90)
933.82
468.78
14.08
473.23
596.91
285.06
1645.16
3186.50
3146.23
5007.29
36761.87
32479.85
21561.94
(4823.45)
31938.42
(4339.56)
28140.29
6138.12
15423.82
(243.50)
(2716.88)
(3844.92)
1107.27
119.45
875.34
(165.28)
3071.48
-
5868.51
956.25
1500.00
-
290.00
(3885.00)
110.00
deposits
Loans to
subsidiaries
Interest received
Dividend from
subsidiaries
Net cash from
Investing
activities (B)
Cash flow from
Financing
activities:
Long term loans
paid
Interest paid
Dividend paid
Repayment of
capital
Dividend Tax
paid
Net cash from
financing
activities (C)
Net increase in
cash and cash
equivalents
(A+B+C)
5Cash and cash
equivalents in the
beginning of the
year
98 | P a g e
(3335.00)
2682.08
775.61
2266.99
-
1718.47
196.56
4182.66
2609.32
555.45
41.25
8.02
(110.01)
(21746.08)
-
(143.51)
(11333.41)
(12130.53)
98.04
12067.56
-
(3657.04)
(3929.04)
1430.47
(25513.13)
(27495.24)
13604.09
10607.95
3254.37
2375.18
14426.28
11171.91
8796.73
99 | P a g e
14426.28
11171.91
3743.77
20745.23
625.33
3571.57
10259.65
595.06
5012.01
5110.86
1049.04
25114.33
14426.28
11171.91
Conclusion
The analysis of annual report of the last three of the
company reveals the company is improving working efficiency
taking step of increasing its turnover.
The analysis reveals that the total income of the company
is increasing and its expenses are decrease. Hence it can be
concluded that the company is performing very efficiently, it has
highly qualified managerial personnel. The analysis also reveals
that the company utilizes its raised sources very efficiently to earn
profit and achieve its objectives.
Company repays there loan regularly which is good sign
for the future.
Ratios show satisfactory situation so it indicate the
companys ability to increase its profit, performance and financial
position is very sound.
Overall it can be concluded that company is performing
very efficiently and therefore it has future prospects in India and
international market.
COLGATE PALMOLIVE LTD. analysis, I can say,
it is financially sound and well managed. The company is trying
to improve its efficiency more and more. We hope that the
company reaches at the top by making strong efforts. It was
tough job to make this repot but last able to complete the
project.
I myself could put into use my theoretical
knowledge. They helping to build my confidence. I am thankful
to all who helped me in the project report.
100 | P a g e
101 | P a g e
BIBLIOGRAPHY
REPORTS
-Annual Report 2007-2008 of GOLGATE-PALMOLIVE
LTD.
Annual Report 2008-2009 of GOLGATE-PALMOLIVE
LTD.
Annual Report 2009-2010 of GOLGATE-PALMOLIVE
LTD.
BOOKS:
-B.S.Shah Principles of financial Management 4 th edition
Ahmedabad,
-B.S.Shah Prakashan. 2008-09.
WEBSITES:
www.Colgate-palmolive.ltd.com
102 | P a g e
103 | P a g e