Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: J.D. Tubbs (1986) Moments for a ratio of correlated gamma variates, Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods, 15:1, 251-259
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610928608829119
COMMUN.
VARIATES
J . D . Tubbs
Department of K a t h e m a t i c a l S c i e n c e s
U n i v e r s i t y of Arkansas
h y p e r g e o m z t ~ ~fz,nctions;
e
Kwmer's
i d e n t i t y ; bivar<ate g m a
ABSTRACT
T h i s p a p e r c o n s i d e r s t h e f i n i t e i n t e g r a l moments f o r t h e
ratio, R
variables.
two c l a s s e s o f u n d e r l y i n g b i v a r i a t e gamma d i s t r i b u t i o n s .
It is
u n a d j u s t e d moment,
E ( R ~ ) ,i f and o n l y i f
e i t h e r of t h e f o l l o w i n g c o n d i t i o n s h o l d : 1) X and Y a r e u n c o r r e l a t e d o r 2 ) m = 1.
A numerical e v a l u a t i o n i s performed t o d e t e r -
1.
INTRODULTION
--.- - --
H i s t o r i c a l l y , t h e problem o f d e r i v i n g t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n and
c o r r e s p n n d i n g moments f o r t h e r a t i o of random v a r i a b l e s X a n d Y
h a s b e e n o f b o t h t h e o r e t i c a l and a p p l i e d i n t e r e 5 t f o r o v e r h a l f
a century.
M i e l k e and F l u e c k (1976) p r e s e n t a r e v i e w o f t h e l i t -
TUBBS
Flueck, Holland,
The
corresponding expressions for the moments of R from the two structures were quite different in their appearance.
This paper investigates the comparison of the respective
finite moments whenever they exist.
2.
2.1
DISTRZBUTTON
- -- -.- .-AXD
--NPIENTS
-
OF-R-
Cherian-David-Xix-S tructure
The results in this section are found in Lee, Holland, and
X/Y
where F (a,b,c,d:x,y)
1
(a)m+n(b)m(c)n
C
----------(d),+,m!n!
m,n=O
Y ,/xl<l/ ~ / < l
(a),
r(a+n)/r(a),
U+P, Y = V+P.
253
B-S,
and S(O<L<min(u,B)).
Under t h i s s t r u c t u r e , i t f o l l o w s
If 5
0 , then X
Furthermore,the c o r r e l a t i o n c o e f f i c i e n t ,
o , can be e x p r e s s e d a s p = c(uB)
-4
t i v e i n t e g r a l moments of R can b e e x p r e s s e d a s
f o r O < m < B.
2.2
The u s u a l s p e c i a l c a s e s of i n t e r e s t a r e g i v e n a s
Jensen S t r u c t u r e
Tubbs and Smith (1984) c o n s i d e r e d a s p e c i a l c a s e of t h e gen-
e r a l Jensen b i v a r i a t e s t r u c t u r e where p
= p.
That i s , l e t X and
i
Y have a b i v a r i a t e gamma d i s t r i b u t i o n w i t h common s c a l e parameter
= pv%--
= C/o.
The d r n s i t y f u n c t i o n f o r R i s g i v e n
bY
where c
The m
if m
th
(a) j n J / j ! ,
c k = (B-a)*n
k
Ik!.
p o s i t i v e moment of R c a n be w r i t t e n a s
E;
i d e n t i c a l whenever X and Y a r e i n d e p e n d e n t .
TUBBS
254
The p u r p o s e o f t h i s p a p e r i s t o c o n s i d e r b o t h e x p r e s s i o n s
g i v e n i n e q u a t i o n s ( 2 . 2 ) and ( 2 . 5 ) and d e t e r m i n e u n d e r w h i c h
c o n d i t i o n s t h e two e q n a t i o n s p r o v i d e i d e n t i c a l r e s u l t s .
Consid-
i d e n t i t y , e q u a t i o n (2.5) can be r e w r i t t e n a s e i t h e r
Tn o r d e r t o p e r f o r m a c o m p a r i s o n of t h e e x p r e s s i o n f o r t h e
moments g i v e n b y t h e two m r t h o d s , e q u a t i o n ( 2 . 2 ) w i l l b e
rewritten as
f o r some c o e f f i c i e n t s 5 .
j
written a s
F u r t h e r m o r e , e q u a t i o n (2.6)
can be
where
t i c a l i f and only i f a
= b. f o r a l l j's.
J
Furthermore, s i n c e
i t f o l l o w s t h a t (2.2)
255
..
Theorem:
-
f o r R , t h e r a t i o of c o r r e l a t e d gamma v a r i a t e s g i v e n by e q u a t i o n s
(2.2) and ( 2 . 6 ) a r e i d e n t i c a l whenever e i t h e r i ) X and Y a r e
independent and m
Proof:
-
i)
(0,R) o r i i ) m = 1 f o r B > 1.
I f X and Y a r e independent t h e n 5 = 0 , w h i c h i m p l i e s
t h e e q u a t i o n s (3.1) and (3.2) reduce t o km(0) and h m ( 0 ) , respecFrom equat Ion (3.31,
t i v e l y , f o r any n o n n e g a t i v e i n t e g e r m(m<a )
i t f o l l o w s t h a t h,(O)
= ( U ) ~ ( R ) - ~By
. c o n s i d e r i n g um ( 5 ) i n equa-
I f m = 1 and
= 0 if
= 0 and
for j
m and
t i c a l i f and o n l y if h l ( j ) = k l ( j ) f o r j
(3.3) t h a t
hl(0) = ~ I R - 1
h l,( l ) =
From (3.5) i t f o l l o w s t h a t
B(D-~).
0,l.
It f o l l o w s from
256
TUBBS
S i n c e ( x ) ~= 1 and ( x ) ~= x , i t i s e a s i l y shown t h a t
ii)
s i o n s a r e i d e n t i c a l whenever k m ( j ) = h m ( j ) f o r j = 1 , 2 , .
C o n s i d e r t h e c a s e where j = m.
. .,m .
Again from ( 3 . 3 ) i t f o l l o w s t h a t
I n c o n s i d e r i n g e q u a t i o n s ( 3 . 7 ) and ( 3 . 8 ) , one o b s e r v e s t h a t
k (m) i s a f u n c t i o n of t h e parameter a v ~ h e r e a s hm(m) i s indepenm
d e n t of a . Hence, e q u a t i o n s ( 2 . 2 ) and ( 2 . 6 ) a r e n o t i d e n t i c a l
f o r a r b i t r a r y p a r a m e t e r s a and 6.
The above theorem g i v e s n e c e s s a r y and s u f f i c i e n t c o n d i t i o n s
f o r t h e two methods t o p r o v i d e i d e n t i c a l r e s u l t s .
The n e x t
4.
NUMERICAL EVALUATE
METHOD 1
METHOD 2
4
0.25
0 . 16
l-I . 1
14
0.05
1 .@0
(1.67
0. 36
0.20
8.75
5.41
3.19
1.79
I .3l
0.96
0.63
0.49
0.42
0.33
0.26
0.20
t o . 10
0 . OH
0. 07
0.116
2 .ti2
2 (:I8
1.64
1.28
.60
0.52
0.44
O. 3 8
I .87
1.60
1.37
1.17
258
TUBBS
T a b l e 1 summarizes t h e f i r s t f o u r u n a d j u s t e d p o p u l a t i o n moments.
Method 1 r e f e r s t o e q u a t i o n ( 2 . ~ )and Method 2 r e f e r s t o equat i o n (2.6).
From T a b l e 1, one o b s e r v e s t h a t t h e h i g h e r u n a d j u s t e d
moments a r e d i f f e r e n t f o r t h e two methods whenever t h e v a r i a b l e s
X and Y a r e c o r r e l a t e d .
i n t h e f i r s t two moments.
However, t h e r e i s v e r y l i t t l e d i f f e r e n c e
From t h e t a b l e one a l s o o b s e r v e s t h a t
t h e u n a d j u s t e d moments a r e s i g n i f i c a n t l y a f f e c t e d by t h e p r e s e n c e
of c o r r e l a t i o n .
T h i s phenomenon was o b s e r v e d by F l u e c k a n d
5.
E x p r e s s i o n s f o r t h e p o s i t i v e i n t e g r a l moments a r e g i v e n f o r
t h e r a t i o of c o r r e l a t e d gamma d i s t r i b u t e d v a r i a b l e s .
l y i n g b i v a r i a t e gamma s t r u c t u r e s w e r e c o n s i d e r e d .
Two under-
It was shown
t h a t t h e two s t r u c t u r e s p r o v i d e i d e n t i c a l r e s u l t s f o r a l l f i n i t e
moments whenever t h e v a r i a b l e s a r e u n c o r r e l a t e d and a r e o n l y
i d e n t i c a l f o r t h e f i r s t moment whenever t h e v a r i a b l e s a r e
correlated.
p a r a m e t e r s p a c e i n d i c a t e d t h a t a l t h o u g h t h e h i g h e r moments do
d i f f e r a c c o r d i n g t o t h e method u s e d , t h e d i f f e r e n c e s a r e p r o b a b l y
i n s i g n i f i c a n t f o r most a p p l i c a t i o n s .
Both methods r e v e a l t h e s i g n i f i c a n t e f f e c t t h a t c o r r e l a t i o n
h a s upon t h e p o p u l a t i o n moments.
Hence, b o t h methods r e i n f o r c e
t h e need f o r e x a c t d i s t r i b u t i o n a l r e s u l t s f o r t h e r a t i o o f gamma
d i s t r i b u t e d v a r i a b l e s a s i n d i c a t e d i n t h e s t u d y of r a i n f a l l o r
r a i n s e e d i n g e x p e r i m e n t s a s g i v e n i n F l u e c k a n d H o l l a n d (1976).
6.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
259
G r a d s h t e y n , I . S. and R y s h i k , I. M . , (1965). T a b l e s o f I n t e g r a l s ,
S e r i e s , and P r o d u c t s . New York: Academic P r e s s .
F l u e c k , J . A. and H o l l a n d , B . S . , ( 1 9 7 6 ) . R a t i o e s t i m a t o r s a n d
some i n h e r e n t problems i n t h e i r u t i l i z a t i o n . J. Appl. Meteoy.,
1 5 , 535-543.
F l u e c k , J . A . , H o l l a n d , B . S . , a n d L e e , R., ( 1 9 7 5 ) . D i s t r i b u t i o n
of t h e r a t i o of c o r r e l a t e d sums of gamma v a r i a b l e s . Proc.
S o c i a l S c i e n c e S e c t i o n , ASA, Washington, D . C . , pp. 285-291.
J e n s e n , D, R . , ( 1 9 7 0 ) . The j o i n t d i s t r i b u t i o n of q u a d r a t i c f o r m s
a n d r e l a t e d d i s t r i b u t i o n s . A u s t r a l . J. o f S t a t i s t . , 12,
13-22.
L e e , R . , H o l l a n d , B . S . , a n d F l u e c k , J. A . , ( 1 9 7 9 ) .
of a r a t i o of c o r r e l a t e d gamma random v a r i a b l e s .
Appl. Math., 2 , 304-320.
Distribution
SIAM J.
d i e l k e , P. IJ. a n d F l u e c k , J. A , , ( 1 9 7 6 ) . D i s t r i b u t i o n s of
r a t i o s f o r some s e l e c t e d h i v a r i a t e probability f u n c t i o n s .
1976 P r o c . S o c i a l S c i e n c e S e c t i o n , ASA, Washington, D.C.,
pp. 608-613.
Tubbs, J. D. and S m i t h , 0 . E . , ( 1 9 8 4 ) . A n o t e on t h e r a t i o o f
p o s i t i v e l y c o r r e l a t e d gamma v a r i a t e s . Commun. S t a t i s t . - T h e o r .
M e t h . , 14, 13-23.