Vous êtes sur la page 1sur 14

Gladni smo na sva tri jezika1: Corruption in Post-Dayton Bosnia

By Ezel ahinkaya
The Dayton Peace Agreement which was signed on 14 December 1995 has two tasks. One is to create a peace and stop the brutal war and ethnic nationalism. Another is to change the path of Bosnia
and Herzegovina from a battlefield into a peaceful market economy in terms of pluralism and economic liberalism. In the Dayton Peace Agreement, there is a "desire to promote the general welfare
and economic growth through the protection of private property and the promotion of a market economy" (Dayton Peace Agreement, Annex 4, Preamble; OHR 1995). There was also a state building
process with the contributions of international actors. Although there were a tripartite presidency,
new national currency, flag and anthem, the newly created state needed to rebuild Bosnia and Herzegovina's war-shattered infrastructure and strengthening the country's transition from socialism to
capitalism and also liberal democracy. International actors offered Bosnia and Herzegovina to implement their institutionalization methods in terms of the funds for reconstruction with the purpose to
create a consolidated stateness, although Bosnian economy during the communist era was different
than other transition countries in South East Europe and East Europe in terms of the capitalist liberal market. In 1990s, the social capital theory was in the mainstream implications especially for
transition countries. The idea of social capital was regarded as a way to predict political performance and political stability which was a quite important absence in these countries. In this context, the
question of social capital was shaped how societies solve their collective action problems. Because
the predictability is so important in the social capital theory, they focused on the policy planning
and making process. Although the term of social capital derives from Pierre Bourdieus articles, in
1990s it was shaped within the institutionalization for transition countries and their path to liberal

The slogan was used by protesters in Tuzla canton during the anti-corruption demonstrations in February
2014. It means that we are all hungry in three languages.

!1

market economy after the Washington Consensus in 1989. Even if according to Bourdieu, social
capital is defined as the aggregate of the actual potential resources which are linked to possession
of a durable network of more of less institutionalized relationships of mutual acquaintance or recognition (Bourdieu in Tzanakis, 2013: 3), Robert D. Putnam framed the term as features of social
organization, such as trust, norms, and networks, that can improve the efficiency of society by facilitating coordinated actions (Putnam, 1993: 169). For scholars who defend the social capital theory,
evaluation criteria which should be derived from the quality of life indices and surveys to observe
the citizens opinions about their various dimension of life quality is crucial. Therefore, they focused on the data from the indices like World Values Survey (WVS) which started in 1981.
Here, in this research paper, I will focus on the higher corruption rate in post-Dayton Bosnia as an
indicator of misapplication of social capital theory to this country. Because in Bosnia, there was an
implication with the context of social capital. There were an intense institutionalization and transition to the liberal market economy with highly attending the international actors and organizations to
the process. With the Dayton Peace Agreement, government was framed as a weak agency both in
political and economic realm. On the other hand, they created a federalist system which includes
many politicians such as parliamentarians, ministers and bureaucrats in all cantons and many laws
and codes to solve the conflict among the three ethnicities and to shape the country in terms of their
understanding of how the liberal market should be. However, this system brings a higher rate of
corruption which blocks and reduces Bosnian citizens life quality, makes politics as an unpredictable and unreliable area and the most important, blocks and prevents the market to produce its own
resources in terms of human capital and economic capital. The reason is that it creates unbalanced
and irrational information and structure in the market. I argue that the process and high corruption
rate are an outcome of intensely and hungrily implied social capital theory by the international ac-

!2

tors and organizations. Ben Fine explains these implications of social capital theory to the transition
countries that:
Social capital has mushroomed in its application to transition economies. The World Bank
sponsored a social capital initiative to explain ill health in Russia by distribution of social
capital this modest aim to be set against the drama of mortality rates having risen over the
countrys transition, unprecedented for a relatively developed economy. In this vein, absence
of social capital at all or of the right type has been seen as the cause of malaise within transitional societies. The inevitable conclusion is that successful transition depends on creating
the right type of social capital, and/or that social capital is seen as amelioration of some for
the negative excesses of an otherwise unexplained transition (Fine, 2010: 104).

In my opinion, at first, there is a need to examine Bosnian corruption case immediately. Although
Roland regards liberal political and economic principles as "the most promising model for the reorganisation of war-shattered states" (Roland, 2002: 640), there is only a higher rate of corruption and
cronyism because of wrongly implemented privatization and liberalization process. Corruption in
Bosnia is accepted as an inalienable part of the political system. Besides corruption, transparency is
a lack in both political and economic arena of the country. Bosnia and Herzegovina was ranked 80
among 175 countries surveyed in Transparency Internationals 2014 Corruption Perceptions Index
(Transparency International, 2014). One has to look for the higher corruption rate in Bosnia and
Herzegovina as a parameter to solve the question why approximately two decade after the signing
of the Dayton Peace Agreement so little progress has been towards rebuilding Bosnia and Herzegovina in terms of liberal, free, 'European' market economy and to see the dysfunctionality of Bosnia's
post-war institutions.

!3

World Bank distinguishes between two main forms of corruption as state capture and administrative
corruption:
Administrative corruption refers to the intentional imposition of distortions in the prescribed
implementation of existing laws, rules and regulations to provide advantages to either governmental or non-governmental actors as a result of the illicit or non-transparent provision
of private gains to public officials (Pradhan, 2000: xvii).

State capture refers to actions of both the public and private sector actors to influence the
formation of laws, regulations, decrees, and other government policies to their advantage
(Pradhan, 2000: xv).
The social capital theory focuses on the trust from the citizens. For scholars who defend this theory,
the trust is one of the biggest necessities for the system to maintain itself. In their argument, if a society has a trust for their political agencies such as government and bureaucracy, they will have
more effective governments, higher growth rates, less corruption and crime. Besides it, they will
have a tendency to redistribute resources from the rich to the poor. They argue that the system will
create its own circle for wealth distribution within a trusting society. On the other hand, they explain the failure of transition countries or economies with the lack of trust. Eric M. Uslaner explains
this failure that:
Many people in transition countries have an opinion that they cannot succeed in life in terms
of their economic standards unless they have connections, engage in corruption, or both.
However, social capital theory offers them that optimism and control are the strongest determinants of trust (Uslaner, 2008: 110).

!4

He also sees that only the courts and the police among governmental institutions have the power to
create trust (Uslaner, 2008: 112). In this context, shortly, the trust is a necessity and transition countries have a lack of trust therefore they cannot achieve their ends in the market. Also Uslaner explains this failure with the argument that the legacy of communism prevents the progress in these transition countries like Bosnia and Herzegovina. However, Bosnia is a different example within the
transition countries. Peter W. Singer defines Bosnian economy as:
The best description of the Bosnian economy is that it combines a Communist legacy with
the worst excesses of a free market system: there is government interference in some economic areas and absolutely no governance in others. Ironically, at the start of the decade, the
citizens of Yugoslavia had the most experience with capitalism of all the Eastern European
states. There is no lack of entrepreneurship, as is often the case in societies in transition, and
much of the population is well-educated (Singer, 2000: 33).
Besides the difference of Bosnia and Herzegovina in terms of communist legacy from the other
transition countries, there is a cynical and circular relation. These social capital theorists offered a
building institution process to the country with the Dayton Peace Agreement as a solution. They
claimed that everything will be predictable and transparent in the market and political realm. However, in Bosnia, the institutions do not work correctly. The country is on a path to be corrupt and
the degeneration of these institutions creates the high level of corruption. Nowadays, the social capital theorists are getting to be criticized and they reply all these critiques to their work with a lack
of trust and legacy of communism. However, they knew that the country had a communist past
when they wanted to build their liberal market there and impose their institutions for their own global interests.

!5

In addition to the communist legacy and lack of trust criticism, we can observe that social capital
theorists declare a need for an effective government after the failures of transition markets. However, again in Bosnian context, the international actors created the governmental system in the country and the constitution with and after the Dayton Peace Agreement. They are also still the part of
the state building process with their NGOs, security forces and international organizations. For
example, Office of the High Representative (OHR) has tasks to create a multi-ethnic and democratic state. Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) has tasks to ensure democratization process and electoral support. Although there are two decades after the Dayton Peace Agreement was signed, state building process is still ineffective and passive. This also serves the interests of international actors because, in this way, they still maintain their domination over the country. Also, they can frame the definition of liberal and democratic state with their own perception
to the country. If an effective government is a necessity for the social capital and adequate wealth
distribution, why did these international actors claim a need for a partial government which has a
symbolic effect within a federal state during the Dayton Peace Agreement? With this artificial imposed political system, in Bosnia and Herzegovina, there is at least one politician or bureaucrat in
all families. They blocked the political area with the bureaucracy and political institutions both in
federal and in canton level. Did not they know the need for an effective government during the
Dayton Peace Agreement or the state building process?
In social capital theory, Putnam, Pharr, and Dalton offer a general explanation for the top-down
connection between social and political trust and the institutional arrangements of democratic government and society, which they call the rainmaker hypothesis (Putnam, Pharr and Dalton in Castiglione, Deth and Wolleb, 2008: 255). In this rainmaker hypothesis, citizens are more likely to support their politicians and political institutions if they think they perform well, are open and fair, if
the party system is inclusive, if politicians are accountable, if government performs well and is stab!6

le and durable, and if civil liberties are protected (Newton, 2008: 260). However, we cannot observe
these attitudes for Bosnian citizens because the distinction of their voting behaviour is framed within their ethnicity. As a matter of fact that the presidential system and political party system were
established on the ethnicity politics after the Dayton Peace Agreement. On the other hand, people
are aware of how much politicians are corrupt as we can see in the Bosnian politics. Bakir Izetbegovi who is the son of Alija Izetbegovi has declared victory in the Bosnian presidential elections
in October 2014 to become the Bosniak member of the tripartite Presidency of the Council. However, many Bosnian people call him as zlatne kaike which means a golden spoon. In addition to it,
when Bosnian people were addressed a question which included a scale with 1 means very bad; 10
means very good as Where on this scale would you put the political system as it is today?, they
answered it with a total 59.5 per cent of negative replies in their 1-4 scales (World Values Survey,
2001: 34).
Bosnian people have serious doubts about the political and economic arena. They had experienced
the protests against corruption and privatization process runned by the government in February
2014 and plenums in March 2014. The protests were defined as a 'Balkan Spring'. In the floods in
May 2014 which had serious effects on Bosnian people and economy, they looked with suspicion to
the government as it can be seen in the news:
The floods washed away many homes rebuilt after the war, and although Bosnian, Serbian,
and Croatian citizens rushed to help those affected, there are fears that post-flood reconstruction will stall, just as post-war reconstruction did, on incompetence and corruption. As
Sadzida noted, "It said a lot that we were organising our own aid efforts among ourselves to
those affected by the floods, not donating to the emergency government fund, because no
one trusts them" (McRobie, Al Jazeera, 2014).

!7

In Bosnia and Herzegovina after the war, there is an ultra-rich elite who has the political, economic
and criminal networks. These people had gained higher amount of economic and political profit
from the war. Timothy Donais argues that there is a "collusion among Bosnia's criminal elements,
government officials, and members of the country's nationalist ruling parties" and also argues that:
A significant number of political decision-makers still benefit directly from the status-quo of
a largely unreformed economy, and that there remains within Bosnia a substantial constituency either directly opposed to the types of market-oriented reforms being promoted by the
international community, or willing and able to manipulate such reforms to their own advantage (Donais, 2005: 67).
In Bosnia, there is an institutionalization of crime and corruption with the oligarchs who benefit the
conditions of war and also post-war period. Mary Kaldor generalizes the situation within the term
of mafia economy. "The mafia economy was built into the conduct of warfare, creating a self-sustaining logic to the war both to maintain lucrative sources of income and to protect criminals from
legal processes which might come into effect in peacetime" (Kaldor, 1999: 55). Timothy Donais
regards these oligarchs as "three ethnically divided and geographically separated cartels, which
group the nationalist political parties, organized criminal elements, and remnants of the socialist-era
nomenklatura" and argues that:
These cartels retain tight control of state-owned enterprises, running them largely as party
fiefs; they operate complex networks of illegal party financing; and they are implicated in
everything fron drug smuggling and customs evasion to the trafficking of women (Donais,
2005: 10).
Timothy Donais also examines the roles of paramilitary groups and gangsters in the corruption case
in this way:
!8

While much emphasis has been placed on the political and military objectives of the paramilitaries, there was also a crucial economic dimension, and motivation, to their activities.
Payment often came in the form of being allowed to be first to loot, while many paramilitary
leaders, Arkan2 being among the most prominent, took advantage of wartime conditions to
engage heavily in smuggling and other black-market activities, often cooperating across
confrontation lines (Donais, 2005: 69).
On the other hand, the US General Accounting Office's report in 2000 shows that "having used illegal networks for military and economic ends during the war, political parties are now inseparable
from criminal organizations" (GAO, 2000: 14).
For social capital theorists, corruption is assumed as a negative externality. They blame that urban
gangs, NIMBY (not in my backyard) movements, and power elites often exploit social capital to
achieve ends that are antisocial from a wider perspective (Putnam, 2000: 21-2). In addition to it,
they offer social capital again as a solution. Putnam argues that social capital makes us smarter,
healthier, safer, richer, and better able to govern a just and stable democracy (Putnam, 2000: 290).
The counter argument of this democracy building process within the social capital theory comes
from Stefan Sullivan. He claims that:
If poverty is the ugly face of unregulated capitalism, corruption is the ugly face of unfinished democracy. Unfinished because, though the liberal tradition has often viewed democracy as a set of freedoms from (most recently in the events of 1989freedom from tyranny
and the restriction of individual rights), the postcommunist experience has also exposed
democracy as a work in progress, a set of freedoms toward, a process of building institutions that would ensure a more equitable access to the social surplus (Sullivan, 2002: 95).

eljko Ranatovi known as Arkan, was a Serbian career criminal and commander of a paramilitary force
in the Yugoslav Wars in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo.

!9

I argue that social capital theory has close connections with globalization and neocolonialism through the new institutional economics. I can explain it with McDonaldisation thesis which is created
by George Ritzer. He argues McDonaldisation thesis, in which the humble hamburger serves as a
model for understanding modern capitalism, and not just consumption (Ritzer in Fine, 2010: 19).
With social capital, like McDonalds, you can always find a local outlet unless you are very unlucky, even in the most unlikely of places. (Fine, 2010: 21-2) Here, we can examine the first McDonalds which was opened in 2011 in the capital city, Sarajevo. This topic was quite popular in
international media. They matched the McDonalds opening in Sarajevo with modernity, connection
to the West and a symbol of the Western world. They took the event as a becoming a part of western
Europe for Bosnia. One discursive example from these news is that nearly sixteen years after the
war ended, the Bosnian capital has attained the ultimate sign of modernity: a McDonalds on the
main central thoroughfare, Marshal Tito Street (MacDonald, Financial Times, 2011). The US ambassador who is Patrick S. Moon made a speech in the opening which was:
The opening of McDonalds is a visible symbol to the rest of the world that Bosnia and
Herzegovina is open for business. McDonalds represents a U.S. tradition of entrepreneurship, innovation, quality, efficiency, and corporate social responsibility. The McDonalds
story is a true testament to entrepreneurship one that I hope inspires other entrepreneurs in
Bosnia and Herzegovina to move forward with their own unique and innovative ideas
(Moon, US Embassy in Sarajevo, 2011).
These discursive domination of the social capital theory is common for communist and post communist countries. When the first McDonalds was opened in Belgrade where was the capital city of
Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in 1988, in the international media, we can observe the
headlines such as Big Mac Takes Attack To 1st Communist Land in Chicago Tribune. For McDonalds in Sarajevo, we can observe also the problems derived from the countrys institutions and the
!10

artificial system to have a foreign investment in Bosnian market. In Independent, we can see a passage which includes:
"We faced problems with a very complex system of government and administration, a difficult tax system and patent corruption," said Adi Hadziarapovic, McDonald's local marketing director. "This is why the process took so long - four years!" he said (Independent,
2011).
To conclude this paper, I am criticizing the democracy building and state building process with the
context of social capital theory. In this way, international actors take into consideration of their own
interests in the market. Therefore, they frame Bosnian market within this perception. All in all, it
creates a high level of corruption in Bosnia and Herzegovina case as I mentioned hereinabove.
From a Marxist standpoint, democracy in the service of capitalism has equally degenerated to a
grand and general corruption (Sullivan, 2002: 96). I argue that the ineluctably increased corruption was derived from a package of of Washington Consensus style policies which includes the aim
to remove state from the market in Dayton Peace Agreement for Bosnia. It is one tremendous
example and as a failure of the liberal democratic state.

!11

Bibliography
1. "Bosnia's First McDonald's Gives Much-awaited Taste of West." The Independent. Independent
Digital News and Media, 02 Aug. 2011. Web. 15 Dec. 2014.
2. Bosnia Peace Operation: Crime and Corruption Threaten Successful Implementation of the
Dayton Peace Agreement." US General Accounting Office (GAO), 2000. Washington. Web.
Available online at http://www.gao.gov/assets/230/229311.pdf
3. Castiglione, Dario, Jan W. Van. Deth, and Guglielmo Wolleb. The Handbook of Social Capital.
Oxford: Oxford UP, 2008. Print.
4. "Corruption by Country / Territory." Transparency International, 2014. Web. 15 Nov. 2014. Available online at http://www.transparency.org/country#BIH_DataResearch_SurveysIndices
5. Donais, Timothy. The Political Economy of Peacebuilding in Post-Dayton Bosnia. London New
York: Routledge, 2005. Print.
6. "Embassy of the United States Bosnia & Herzegovina." 2011 Speeches. N.p., 19 June 2011.
Web. 12 Dec. 2014.
7. Fine, Ben. Theories of Social Capital: Researchers Behaving Badly. London: Pluto, 2010. Print.
8. Kaldor, Mary. New and Old Wars: Organized Violence in a Global Era. Cambridge England
Malden, MA: Polity Press, 1999. Print.
9. MacDonald, Neil. "Bosnia Gets a McDonalds." Beyondbrics. Financial Times, 19 June 2011.
Web. 12 Dec. 2014.
10. McRobie, Heather. "Http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/07/bosnia-rememberingsrebrenica-massacre-201471583512715776.html." Al Jazeera. Al Jazeera, 15 July 2014. Web.
!12

17 Nov. 2014. <http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2014/07/bosnia-remembering-srebrenica-massacre-201471583512715776.html>


11. Newton, K. 2008. Trust and Politics Pp. in 241-272 in The Handbook of Social Capital, ed. D.
Castiglione, J. W. Van and G. Wolleb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Pradhan, Sanjay. Anticorruption in Transition: A Contribution to the Policy Debate. Washington,
D.C.: World Bank, 2000. World Bank. Web. Available online at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/contribution.pdf
13. Putnam, R. D. (1993) Making Democracy Work: civic traditions in modern Italy, Princeton
University Press, Princeton.
14. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New
York: Simon & Schuster.
15. Roland, P. (2002) "International peacebuilding and the mission civilisatrice" Review of International Studies Vol. 28, (2002), pp. 637656
16. Singer, P. T. (2000) "Bosnia 2000: Phoenix or Flames?" World Policy Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1
(Spring, 2000), pp. 31-37
17. Sullivan, Stefan. Marx for a Postcommunist Era: On Poverty, Corruption, and Banality. London:
Routledge, 2002. Print.
18. "The General Framework Agreement: Annex 4." The General Framework Agreement: Annex 4.
OHR (Office of the High Representative), 14 Dec. 1995. Web. 17 Nov. 2014. Available online at
http://www.ohr.int/dpa/default.asp?content_id=372

!13

19. Tzanakis, Michael. "Social Capital in Bourdieus, Colemans and Putnams Theory: Empirical
Evidence and Emergent Measurement Issues." Educate 13.2 (2013): 2-23. Http://wh.agh.edu.pl/
other/materialy/672_2014_04_23_13_04_24_Spcial_capital2.pdf. Web. 28 Dec. 2014.
20. Uslaner, E. M. 2008. Trust as a moral value Pp. in 101-121 in The Handbook of Social Capital, ed. D. Castiglione, J. W. Van and G. Wolleb. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. WV4_Results_Bosnia_and_Herzegovina_2001_v_2014_04_18.pdf; World Values Survey Association (www.worldvaluessurvey.org) Aggregate File Producer: ASEP/JDS, Madrid.

!14