Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s10591-008-9067-1
ORIGINAL PAPER
Introduction
Children may suffer devastating aftereffects at the sight of domestic cruelties, including
negative behavioral, cognitive, social, and emotional outcomes (Osofsky 2003, p. 162).
Abused parents may neglect their children as they recover from their traumas (Osofsky
2003), and these children are more likely to be victimized themselves (English 1998;
Folsom et al. 2003). Such deleterious effects may be multiplied when the abuse is lifeending or life-threatening for a parent (Lewandowski et al. 2004). In most cases of
domestic femicides, women are abused for years before they are murdered, subjecting
children to on-going observations of violence and trauma (Moracco et al. 1998; Smith
et al. 1998).
S. D. Georgiades (&)
School of Social Work, Saint Ambrose University, McMullen Hall, 518 West Locust, Davenport,
IA 52803, USA
e-mail: GeorgiadesSavvasD@sau.edu
123
142
123
143
Method
Brief Case Overview
This case study concerns a 13-year-old, Greek-Cypriot boy who battled with debilitating
fears about his father harming him and/or his family following exposure to a sequence of
traumatic events. Trauma in this boys life began at the age of eight when he first saw his
father physically and verbally abusing his mother. Thereafter, the abuse escalated, culminating in an incident when the fathers anger was directed at both his wife and son.
Following a volatile dispute with his spouse, and under the guise of the boy supposedly
irritating him with his unruly behavior, the father pulled his 9-year-old son by the hair,
threw him on the floor, and kicked him in the stomach a couple of times, calling him slurs.
The mother ran to her sons rescue but no report was filed with the police or child
protective services.
Following this abusive incident, the mother sought legal assistance and eventually
managed to have her spouse move out of the house while simultaneously beginning
divorce proceedings. At some point, the mother became concerned as the boys mood
changed very suddenly from one of great energy and excitement to continuous depression and gradual deterioration of his once excellent school performance. Oblivious to the
causes of her sons sudden mood swings, the mother sought out intervention from the
therapist.
The Onset of Therapy: In-person and E-mail Exchanges
Voluntary, not for fee, in-person therapy sessions with the boy began in December of 1999
and continued until January, 2000, but were reduced to e-mail communications in the
winter, spring, and summer of 2000, and the fall, winter, and spring of 2001, 2002, 2003,
due to the therapists stay in the U.S. All in all, 81 emails were exchanged between the boy
123
144
and the therapist. Several in person conferences also occurred in the summers of 2002 and
2003 when the therapist returned to Cyprus.
The first therapy session was held at the boys home. During this meeting, the therapist
relayed to the boy his mothers concerns and noted that he wanted to help the boy overcome his personal challenges. It was also clarified that, if the boy consented to therapy, all
information shared would be kept strictly confidential unless associated with potential selfharm or harm to others. The boy agreed to therapy and the initial emphasis was briefly
placed on things the boy liked about himself, his school, and his family. The boy indicated
that he liked sports, he thought he was a good person, he loved his family, and dearly
enjoyed history and physical education classes. He was then asked about things he wanted
to change in his life and he indicated that he wanted to improve his relationship with his
dad and become a better student.
During the next session, exploration of the clients relationship with his dad led to
revelations about the abuse he and his mom had endured by his father 4 years previously.
The client also disclosed that he truly feared what his father could do to him and his family.
He made reference to a case he had heard of in which a Greek-Cypriot father murdered his
daughter during an overnight visitation he had with her after he divorced his wife. The boy
indicated that this case frightened him to a point that he often thought of his father
intruding into their house and murdering him, his mother, and his sister. He further
revealed that his fears were intensified because his father was calling him occasionally and
inviting him to spend weekends with him at his home.
Following an attempt to explore, identify, and validate the clients feelings, the therapist
questioned whether the father had ever made any life threats to himself and/or his family,
and the boy indicated that he had not. The therapists request to contact the father and
assess his intentions was categorically denied by the boy.
Solution-Focused Intervention
In e-mails, the therapist applied a solution-focused intervention that helped the boy construct his own safety plans in the event that his father turned violent again. At this juncture,
questions such as, What are some things that you think you could start doing now that
would help protect you from future violence from your father? were used. As a result of
this solution exploration process, the boy learned the phone numbers to the police and
medical first aid, began self-defense classes, and developed the assertiveness to tell his
father that he did not yet want to visit him at his house. The boys choice was to maintain
only occasional phone contact with his father because he felt that this was not life
threatening, would make the father less angry than having no contact at all, and eventually
could help improve his relationship with his father.
A Major Re-traumatizing Life Event
In 2001, the boys parents officially divorced against the will of his father, whose preference was for reconciliation with his wife. The following morning the father showed up at
the house, (while the boy and his sister were at school), and severely abused his ex-wife.
The punches and kicks left the woman unconscious on the floor, with a hematoma on her
head and heavy bruises on her face and all over her body. A neighbor heard the womans
screams and ran to her rescue. An ambulance was called and the boys mother was
123
145
hospitalized for 2 weeks until her wounds subsided. The father was arrested then released
pending trial.
When the boy wrote to the therapist to inform him about the situation, the father had
already been released from jail and his mother was home receiving outpatient care for her
wounds. The boy also shared that his father called him and asked him to have his mom
drop the charges because if she didnt, he would kill her once he got out of jail. Out of fear,
the boy promised his father that he would try to convince his mom to comply with his
request. The therapist indicated that per their confidentiality agreement, he was legally
mandated to call his mother and inform her about the fathers threats; the boy indicated that
he had already done so.
When the therapist called the mother, she confirmed the boys claim. She also had gone
with him to the police to testify about the fathers recent maneuver. The response of the
police was that they could not make an arrest because a trial was pending, and no independent witness was available, so instead they issued a restraining order against the father.
The police department also offered to place the house under surveillance, but indicated that
this would simply be on a very temporary basis. The police briefed the mother that she and
her children had to be very vigilant and immediately contact them if the father appeared
anywhere in the vicinity of their house.
Solution Focused Therapy Post Re-trauma
Successive e-mail communications focused on the boys feelings about the abuse, his
articulation of a more meticulous safety plan in the event that his father attempted to reoffend, his personal choice to attempt to convince his mom to drop the charges out of fear
for her life, and his eventual success in doing so. Even though he felt greatly relieved when
his mother eventually was persuaded to remove the charges, he also experienced guilt
about pressuring his mom to do so because he felt she would not receive the justice she
deserved. He was confident, however, that his mother was now safer than if she attempted
to prosecute his father.
The boy then shared that he spent time trying to understand why his father turned out to
be so abusive to his mother immediately after their divorce. He thought that his father was
still in love with his mother, and was very upset about their divorce, as well as the fact that
he had no contact with his children. He suspected that the father thought his mom had
turned her children against him, which supposedly accentuated the fathers resentment,
which culminated in the abusive episode. Essentially, the boy felt that, in part, his father
was so abusive to his mom because he and his sister very persistently had avoided contact
with him in the past.
Solution-focused questions, such as, What do you think needs to be done to convince
your father that your mom is not to blame for you not keeping close contact with him? or
What do you think could help your father decrease his resentment towards your mom?
helped the boy visualize a strategy for rectifying his fathers faulty attributions. He indicated that even though he wanted to have an open conversation with his father, to explain
to him that his mom never turned him or his sister against him, he did not feel comfortable
doing so. When the therapist asked the boy about other ways of conveying this message to
the father, the boy replied, I could write him a letter. Ensuing discussion revealed that
this was the intervention option that the boy favored the most. The boy asked the therapist
if he would mind reading the letter before he sent it to his dad, and the therapist agreed to
do so.
123
146
123
147
the letter intervention. A total of 15 standardized assessments were completed by the client
between the years 1999 and 2003.
The CAF scale (Hudson 1997) is a 25 item instrument designed to measure the extent,
degree, or severity of problems a child has with his father. The CAF scale has two cut-off
scores. The first is a score of 30 (5); scores below this point indicate absence of a
clinically significant problem in this area. Scores above 30 suggest presence of a clinically
significant problem. The second cut-off score is 70. Scores above this point nearly always
indicate that clients are experiencing severe stress, with a clear possibility that some
violence could be considered or used to deal with problems. The CAF has a mean alpha of
.95, and excellent stability with 1-week testretest correlations of .96. It also has excellent
known-groups validity, significantly distinguishing between children who rate themselves
as having relationship problems with their parents, and those who do not, and good
predictive validity, significantly predicting childrens responses to questions regarding
problems with their parents (Corcoran and Fischer 2000).
The DSRS scale (Birleson 1981) is an 18 item instrument designed specifically to assess
depression in children. DSRS items are scored on a 3-point scale, with positively worded
items ranging from 0 to 2, and negatively worded items ranging from 2 to 0. These
responses are totaled, so the range of possible scores is 036. It has fair internal consistency ranging in alpha values from .86 and .73. Its testretest coefficient is .80, showing
good stability. The DSRS has good concurrent validity, correlating .81 with the Childrens
Depression Inventory. It also has good known-groups validity, significantly discriminating
between depressed and non-depressed children with very few false positive errors
(Corcoran and Fischer 2000).
Finally, the CROPS scale (Greenwald and Rubin 1999) is a 25 item instrument for
assessing a childs self-report of post-traumatic stress symptoms. It is easily scored by
summing item responses. The total possible range of scores on the CROPS is 052. Higher
scores indicate more intense posttraumatic stress. The CROPS has excellent internal
consistency with an alpha value of .91. Its 46 week testretest correlation is .80 (Corcoran
and Fischer 2000).
Results
Linegram 1 indicates the boys CAF, DSRS, and CROPS scores over time. As can be seen,
the boys feelings towards his father improved slightly at 6 months, deteriorated significantly immediately after the life-threatening wife abuse (LTWA) episode towards his
mom, remained as such at the 6 month follow up, but improved sharply 9 months after the
letter intervention was implemented. His depression level dropped slightly at 6 months,
significantly sharpened immediately after the LTWA episode, somewhat subsided at
6 months (while still remaining at a clinical level), and practically vanished at the 9-month,
post letter intervention, follow up.
Finally, the clients posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms augmented slightly at
6 months, sky-rocketed immediately after the LTWA episode, dropped off substantially at
the 6 month follow up, and completely evaporated 9 months after implementation of the
letter intervention.
Linegram 2 displays the boys grade average over time. As can be seen, his school
performance enhanced slightly at 6 months, declined significantly after the LTWA episode, and elevated substantially at 6 months, and 9 months after implementation of the
letter intervention.
123
148
100
CAF
80
DSRS
60
CORPS
40
20
0
Baseline
6-month
Post-WAE 6-month
9-month
Post Ll
Fig. 1 Clients clinical progress over time. Note: WAE = Wife Abuse Episode; LI = Letter Intervention
94
92
90
88
86
84
82
80
Baseline
6-Months
Post-WAE
6-Months
9-Month Post-LI
Time
Fig. 2 Clients academic performance over time. Note: * Alphabetical grades were converted into
numerical grades as follows: A = 95, B = 85, C = 75; WAE = Wife Abuse Episode; LI = Letter
Intervention
Discussion
This longitudinal case study speaks volumes about the importance for clinicians to treat
youth clients as experts regarding their specific circumstances, and to respect, to the
highest degree possible, their personal assets, goals, and choices of intervention. The case
study also corroborates a bulk of scientific evidence suggesting that the solution-focused
clinical method is particularly effective with teenage populations in a multiplicity of
contexts (Burns and Hulusi 2005; Corcoran 1997; Franklin et al. 2001). Future research
should therefore continue to shed light on the immense potential of this treatment modality
in clinical work with youths in domestic violence situations and other oppressive contexts.
At the same time, it is important to note that the solution-focused intervention employed
would likely have failed if utilized in a vacuum. In the present case, it probably succeeded
because it was facilitated by a trustworthy therapeutic relationship, including unlimited
access to the therapist. Some of the therapeutic benefits observed also may have been the
direct result of the youths and/or the fathers maturation.
Nevertheless, this case study also illustrates the vitality of email therapy with youth
clients who are technologically literate and lack physical proximity to their therapist. An
obvious disadvantage of email therapy is that the therapist cannot have access to clients
nonverbal cues and reactions. On the other hand, such therapy allows for more reflective
123
149
discussion, as both the therapist and the client have more time at their disposal to process
incoming information and decide on a course of action and reasonable solutions.
Ethics should be the guiding force in the selection of interventions with youth harmed
by any social malice, including domestic violence. The barometer of any decision should
be protection of the clients best interests. Despite an immense ethical challenge presented
throughout the intervention, the eventual outcomes of the latter seem quite positive, perhaps partly because this therapists utmost concern was to help the client in the most
personally meaningful way. The therapist also maintained genuine empathy, respect, and
optimism for this client throughout the intervention.
This case study is not free from limitations. The client of interest was a very witty
teenager, with an amazing intellect and insight into the affective landscape of his intrafamilial system, ample maternal and clinical support, and a paternal perpetrator very
amenable to the intervention of choice. Not all perpetrators will experience a life altering
impact owing to an expressive writing intervention designed by their offspring. In fact, for
some, such intervention might trigger disastrous consequences, if, for instance, words are
not prudently chosen to avoid ticking off the violent parent. Moreover, the intervention
under investigation may not be as salient in other cultural contexts, in which, for example,
there is not analogous weight placed on the significance of blood ties, respect towards
parents, and communal endorsement of ones actions, as in Greek culture (Bozionelos
2006; Georgas 1989, 1991; Ierodiakonou 1976, 1985; Skinner 1966; Vassiliou and
Vassiliou 1974). An additional limitation of the case study is that the Greek versions of the
three standardized instruments utilized had unknown validity and reliability.
In conclusion, this case study suggests that there may be utility in incorporating solution
focused interventions and email therapy in clinical work with youth clients suffering from
domestic violence. Future research should therefore assess further the efficacy of these
interventions. The present findings should only be treated as preliminary in view of the
case studys methodological shortcomings.
Acknowledgments This report would not have been possible without the gracefulness of this youth and
his family who consented to publication. The author also thanks Dr. David Cohen and Dr. Miriam Potocky
of Florida International University, and this journals editors and anonymous reviewers for comments made
to a previous draft.
References
Al-Krenawi, A., Graham, J. R., & Sehwail, M. A. (2007). Tomorrows players under occupation: An
analysis of the association of political violence with psychological functioning and domestic violence,
among Palestinian youth. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77, 427433.
Berg, I. K., & DeJong, P. (2005). Engagement through complimenting. Journal of Family Psychotherapy,
16, 5156.
Berg, I. K., & Shafer, K. C. (2004). Working with mandated substance abusers: The language of solutions.
In S. Straussner & L. Ashenberg (Eds.), Clinical work with substance-abusing clients (2nd ed., pp. 82
102). New York: Guilford Press.
Birleson, P. (1981). The validity of depression disorders in childhood and the development of a self-rating
scale: A research report. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 22, 7388.
Bozionelos, N. (2006). Mentoring and expressive network resources: Their relationship with career success
and emotional exhaustion among Hellenes employees involved in emotion work. International Journal
of Human Resource Management, 17, 362378.
Burman, S., & Allen-Meares, A. P. (1994). Neglected victims of murder: Childrens witness to parental
homicide. Social Work, 39, 2841.
Burns, K., & Hulusi, H. (2005). Bridging the gap between a learning support centre and school: A solutionfocused group approach. Educational Psychology in Practice, 21, 123130.
123
150
Chatzifotiou, S. (2003). Violence against women and institutional responses: The case of Greece. European
Journal of Social Work, 6, 241256.
Constantino, R., Crane, A., Noll, B. S., Doswell, W. M., & Braxter, B. (2007). Exploring the feasibility of
email-mediated interaction in survivors of abuse. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing,
14, 291301.
Corcoran, J. (1997). A solution-oriented approach to working with juvenile offenders. Child & Adolescent
Social Work Journal, 14, 277288.
Corcoran, K., & Fischer, J. (2000). Measures for clinical practice: A sourcebook, volume 1: Couples,
families, and children (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Dedoussi, A., Gregory, S., Georgoussi, G., & Kyriopoulos, J. (2004). Social workers in Greece: Who they
are and where they work. International Social Work, 47, 259274.
de Schazer, S., Dolan, Y., Korman, H., McCollum, E., Trepper, T., & Berg, I. K. (2007). More than
miracles: The state of the art of solution-focused brief therapy. New York, NY: Haworth Press.
Edleson, J. L., Ellerton, A. L., Seagren, E. A., Kirchberg, S. L., Schmidt, S. O., & Ambrose, A. T. (2007).
Assessing child exposure to adult domestic violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 29, 961
971.
English, D. (1998). The extent and consequences of child maltreatment. The Future of Children, 8, 3953.
Folsom, W. S., Christensen, M. L., Avery, L., & Moore, C. (2003). The co-occurrence of child abuse and
domestic violence: An issue of service delivery for social service professionals. Child and Adolescent
Social Work Journal, 20, 375387.
Franklin, C., Biever, J., Moore, K., Clemons, D., & Scamardo, M. (2001). The effectiveness of solutionfocused therapy with children in a school setting. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 411434.
Georgas, J. (1989). Changing family values in Greece: From collectivism to individualism. Journal of
Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 8091.
Georgas, J. (1991). Intrafamily acculturation of values in Greece. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22,
445457.
Georgiades, S. Child abuse in Cyprus: Reality or fiction? International Journal of Childrens Rights (in
press).
Georgiades, S. (2003). Domestic violence in Cyprus: The voices of Nicosian women. Journal of Social
Work Research and Evaluation: An International Publication, 4, 199212.
Goldblatt, H. (2003). Strategies of coping among adolescents experiencing interparental violence. Journal of
Interpersonal Violence, 18, 532552.
Greenwald, R., & Rubin, A. (1999). Assessment of posttraumatic symptoms in children: Development and
preliminary validation of parent and child scales. Research on Social Work Practice, 9, 6175.
Gutierrez, L. M. (1994). Beyond coping: An empowerment perspective on stressful life events. Journal of
Sociology and Social Welfare, 21, 201220.
Gutierrez, L. M., Parsons, R. J., & Cox, E. O. (1998). Empowerment in social work practice: A sourcebook.
Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
Hudson, W. W. (1997). The WALMYR assessment scales scoring manual. Tallahassee, FL: WALMYR
Publishing Company.
Ierodiakonou, C. S. (1976). La famile grecque et son influence sur la genese et levolution de la maladie.
Annales Medico-Psychologiques, 134, 8591.
Ierodiakonou, C. S. (1985). Psychosomatic manifestations in the context of Greek culture. Dynamic Psychotherapy, 3, 8894.
Kokkevi, A., & Agathonos, H. (1987). Intelligence and personality profile of battering parents in Greece: A
comparative study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 11, 9399.
Lewandowski, L. A., McFarlane, J., Campbell, J. C., Gary, F., & Barenski, C. (2004). He killed my
mommy! Murder or attempted murder of a childs mother. Journal of Family Violence, 19, 211220.
McAuley, C., Pecora, P. J., & Rose, W. (2006). Enhancing the well-being of children and families through
effective interventions: International evidence for practice. London, England: Jessica Kingsley
Publishers.
Moracco, K. E., Runyan, C. W., & Butts, J. D. (1998). Femicide in North Carolina, 19911993: A statewide
study of patterns and precursors. Homicide Studies, 2, 422446.
Mosher, C., & Dannoff-Burg, S. (2006). Health effects of expressive letter writing. Journal of Social &
Clinical Psychology, 25, 11221139.
Osofsky, J. D. (2003). Prevalence of childrens exposure to domestic violence and child maltreatment:
Implications for prevention and intervention. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 6, 161
170.
Papadatou, D., Yfantopoulos, J., & Kosmidis, H. V. (1995). Death of a child at home or in a hospital:
Experiences of Greek mothers. Death Studies, 20, 215235.
123
151
Paritsis, N., Pallis, D. J., Lyketsos, G., Phylatou, C., Sarafidou, E., & Vrachini, F. (1984). School delinquent
and deviant behavior in adolescence: The role of childrens personality and attitudes. First Multidisciplinary Conference, Institute of Child Health, Athens.
Parker, J. S., Steward, G. S., & Gantt, C. (2006). Research and intervention with adolescents exposed to
domestic violence. Family Therapy, 33, 4552.
Skinner, J. C. (1966). Symptom and defense in contemporary Greece: A cross-cultural inquiry. The Journal
of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 141(4), 478489.
Smith, P. H., Moracco, K. E., & Butts, J. D. (1998). Partner homicide in context: A population based
perspective. Homicide Studies, 2, 400421.
Solomon, B. (1976). Black empowerment. New York: Columbia University Press.
Stathopoulou, G. (2004). Greece. In K. Malley-Morrison (Ed.), International perspectives on family violence
and abuse: A cognitive ecological approach (pp. 131149). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Sullivan, T., Farrell, A. D., Kliewer, W., Vulin-Reynolds, M., & Valois, R. F. (2007). Exposure to violence
in early adolescence: The impact of self-restraint, witnessing violence, and victimization on aggression
and drug use. Journal of Early Adolescence, 27, 296323.
Vassiliou, V. G., & Vassiliou, G. (1974). Variations of the group process across cultures. International
Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 24, 5565.
Weiss, B., Catron, T., & Harris, V. (2000). Brief reports: A 2-year follow-up of the effectiveness of
traditional child psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 68, 10941101.
Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., & Donenberg, G. R. (1992). The lab versus the clinic: Effects of child and
adolescent psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 47, 15781585.
123