Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Laboratory Report
Kate Auditor, Bethanee Baes, Keana Balverde, Lina Lou Berdijo
Department of Occupational Therapy
College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Santo Tomas
Espaa Street, Manila Philippines
Abstract
and delicacies with the use of measurements.
Society greatly relies on the application
Though measurement has been of measurements in order to progress. Because
standardized in order to reach universality and of this, measuring must be executed properly.
convenience, errors and uncertainties still To pursue this, man developed units of
presents itself, even in simple experiments. measurements.
With the use of a foot rule, a vernier caliper Tracing back to the ancient times, man used
and a micrometer caliper, the mean diameter objects such as ropes, stones and sticks to
of a metallic sphere were measured and measure objects. Units were also based using
derived from to get the average deviation of human body parts such as arms, hands and
the mean diameter and the % error. The sphere feet. However, body parts varied from person
measured a mean diameter and an average to person, making constancy a dilemma. To
deviation of 1.51 cm and 0.03cm with the foot address the confusion, the French National
ruler, 1.582 cm and 0.0009cm with the vernier Assembly appointed the committee that
caliper and 1.5835 cm and 0.0002cm with the created the metric system in 1790.
micrometer. By comparison, the micrometer
To this date, despite the convenient use
caliper proves to be the most accurate with a of standardized measuring tools, errors and
0.33% error, followed by the vernier caliper uncertainties still exist. Hence, this experiment
and the foot rule with a 0.61% error and aims to (1) to study errors and how they
15.71% error respectively.
propagate in simple experiment, (2) to
determine the average deviation of a set of
I. Introduction
experimental values, (3) to determine the mean
of a set of experimental values as well as set of
Man has long put efforts to describe average deviation of the mean, (4) to
his environment in an objective and universal familiarize the students with the vernier
manner. As a result, man has created a special calliper, micrometer calliper, and foot rule, (5)
medium we generally know as measurement. to compare the accuracy of these measuring
Today, measurements continue to be a great devices, (6) and to determine the density of an
part of mans life; its use being utilize by all object given its mass and dimensions.
professions in every variety of settings.
Healthcare practitioners have now been able to
II. Theory
accurately give doses of medicine through the
use of measurements. Similarly, engineers and
In this experiment, uncertainty in
of deviations
no . of observations
average deviation
no . of observations
= average deviation
= Average Deviation
of the mean diameter
meanradius=
meandiameter
2
error =
accepted value
mass
volume
error =
accepted value
Trial
1
1.584cm
1.584cm
1.584cm
1.584cm
1.584cm
1.584cm
4
5
1.583cm
1.584cm
1.583cm
1.584cm
1.583cm
1.583cm
1.583cm
1.583cm
8
9
1.583cm
1.584cm
1.583cm
1.584cm
10
1.583cm
1.583cm
Mean Diam.
1.8535cm
a.d.
0.0005cm
A.D.
0.0002cm
2.0789cm3
Trial
Vol.
Foot Rule
Mass
16.27g
Exp. Val.
7.8259(g/cm3)
Acc. Val.
7.8(g/cm3)
0.33%
% Error
1.60cm
1.60cm
1.50cm
1.50cm
1.60cm
1.60cm
4
5
1.60cm
1.50cm
1.60cm
1.50cm
1.20cm
1.20cm
1.50cm
1.50cm
8
9
1.70cm
1.50cm
1.70cm
1.50cm
10
1.40cm
1.40cm
Mean Diam.
1.51cm
a.d.
0.09cm
A.D.
0.03cm
1.80cm3
Vol.
Mass
16.27g
Exp. Val.
9.04(g/cm3)
Acc. Val.
7.8(g/cm3)
15.71%
% Error
Micrometer Caliper
VII.
Vernier Caliper
1.580cm
1.580cm
1.585cm
1.585cm
1.585cm
1.585cm
1.575cm
1.575cm
1.580cm
1.580cm
1.585cm
1.585cm
1.585cm
1.585cm
1.580cm
1.580cm
1.580cm
1.580cm
10
1.580cm
1.580cm
Mean Diam.
1.582cm
a.d.
0.003cm
A.D.
0.0009cm
Vol.
2.073cm3
Mass
16.27g
Exp. Val.
7.848(g/cm3)
Acc. Val.
7.8(g/cm3)
% Error
0.62%
Thumb
width
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
between a measurement and the accepted or students obtained the following results:
true value. Errors are classified into two (2) 14.43g, 14.32g, 14.33g, 14.30g, and 14.23g.
types: (1) systematic error, which are due to the
limitations of the measuring instruments and a. i. find the mean:
the skill of carefulness of the experimenter, and
14.34 g+14.32 g+14.33 g+14.30 g +14.23 g
(2) random error, which are caused by external
5
factors beyond the control of the experimenter
such as vibrations, noise, changes in
71.52 g
atmospheric pressure and friction. The group
=
5
did encounter a few errors such as parallax
error, and the inexperience using the
= 14.304 g
instruments. However, the group had a harder
time resolving the dilemma with the measuring
ii. find the a.d.:
instrument since the first one the group was
14.304 14.34
0.036
able to use was a broken micrometer with a
14.304 14.32
0.016
missing rachet.
14.304 14.33
0.026
3. Sketch a.) a vernier caliper that reads
5.08cm b.) a micrometer caliper that reads
2.55 mm
(answers are attached at the back)
b. Suppose that your group is required to make
only four determinations for the mass of the
sample. If you are the leader of the group, which
data will you omit? Given the option, each of the
members of the group would like to omit 14.23 g
because it is not as precise as with the other data.
c. Recalculate the mean, a.d. and A.D. without
this data.
i. Mean:
57.29 g
4
= 14.32 g
ii. a.d.:
14.304 14.34
0.036
14.304 14.30
14.304 14.23
0.004
/-0.074/
0.036+0.016+ 0.026+0.004+
0.074 /
5
0.156
=0 . 0312 g
5
iii. find the A.D.:
0.0312
5 = 0.0139 g
14.304 14.32
14.304 14.33
14.304 14.30
0.016
0.026
0.004
0.036+0.016+0.026+ 0.004
4
0.05
=0 . 0125 g
4
iii. A.D.
0.0125
4 = 0.00625g
VIII. Reference:
Edmonds, Dean S. Jr, Cioffaris Experiments in
College Physics, Massachusetts: D.C. Health
and Company, 1988