Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Facies Models
2. Turbidites and
Associated
Coarse Clastic
Deposits
Roger G. Walker
Department of Geology
McMaster University
Hamilfon, Ontar10L8S 4M7
lntroduetlon
To the sedimentologist. Me turbidity
current concept is both simple and
elegant. Each turb~dite(defined as the
deposit of aturbidity current) is the result
of a single, short lived event, and once
deposited, it is extremely unlikely to be
rewciked by other currents. The
concept is elegant because it allows the
interpretationof thousands of graded
sandstone beds, alternating with shales.
as the result of a series of similar events.
and it can safely be stated that nosimilar
volume of clastic rock can be interpreted
so simply.
In this review. I will begin by studying
the "classical" turbidite, and will then
gradually broaden the scale to
encompass turbidites and related
coarse clastic rocks in their typical
depositional environments - deep sea
fans and abyssal plains.
The concept of turbidites was
introduced to the geological profession
in 1950.At that time, nobody had
observed a modern turbidity current in
the ocean, yet the evidence for density
currents had become overwhelming.
The concept accounted for graded
sandstone beds that lacked evidence of
shallow water reworking, and it
accounted for transported shallow water
forams in the sandstones, yet bathyal or
abyssal benthonic forams in
interbedded shales. Low density
p-'
T :
BOUMA DIVISIONS
..............
I.. .
. :............:.......
INTERPRETATION
FINES IN TURBIDITY CURRENT, FOLLOWED
BY PELAGIC SEDIMENTS
--',
LOWER
.......................
.......................
.......................
......................
......................
.......................
TRACTION IN
FLOW REGIME
UPPER
RAPID DEPOSITION,
QUICK BED
I
Figure 1
Five drnsions of the Bourna model for
ru,o orcs A-qrzoeo or mass .e wnosrone
R-pa*a e 3 m n ~ r e osan!lsto~rC-, j p Y
cross~larninaredline sandstone: (DJ-fain1
parallel lam~natronsof sill andrnud, bracketed
Figure 2
C o m ~ l e l e'Bourna"twbldrle (see FIO
- 11.
shoi,ngpelitjc d~wsonE ofloierbed(bottorn
leftl: oraded drvision A, oarallel larnrnaled
drvrsron B and npple cross larnrnated drvrsron
AEIBCEICE
lo ernphasfzethat an
l wealhered or fecton~zed
OutcroDs ~tcannot be separared from E pe r c r ,son [~<lrl
, orpos teo 0,me
rum or, c,rren p ~ ! npm
, or nq r
lnterpretatlons of deposrtionalprocess are
grouped rnlo lhree main phases, see text
C D,nsrons fDI
, , and E were broken off thrs
speornen, whfch is from the Care Frechette
roadcul. Levs Forrnatlon lCarnbrian1.
Quebec
Gigure 3
Hypothetical sequence oflhree lurbrdrles.
drsciihed as AE BCE and CE m the Bourna
model See text
27
Figure4
~ i o i i of
p iowpara~~eisrdedlurb,dites.
AE. AE,
AE and AE, suggest,nglhaf the beds are
close fo lheir source (prox~mal).
Beds slightly
%&*%
,qgure
Very r!nn furbidile sandsfones with fhfcker
rnterbeddedshales Beds begrn wrlh Bouma
div!srons B and C, andsuggesl deposifron lar
Environmentsof Twbidite
Deposition
Because a turbidite is simply thedeposit
of a turbidity current, turbidites can be
found in any environment where turbidity
or density currents operate. These
environments include lakes and
reservoirs. delta fronts. continental
shelves, and most importantly, the
deeper ocean basins. However. to be
preserved and recognized as a turbidite.
the features imposed on the bed by the
current (ideally: sharp base with sole
marks. graded bedding. Bouma
d~wsions)must not be reworked by other
types of currents. Small turb~diteshave
been preserved in quiet water glacial
lakes: thin prodeltalc turbidites can flow
into water deep enough that agitation of
the bottom by storms is very rare (say.
less than one storm in 500 years), but to
preserve a thick (hundreds or thousands
of metres) turbidite sequence. the most
likely environment is one that IS
consistently deep and quiet Using
present day morphological terms. these
environments would include the
continental rise (made up of coalescing
submarine fans) and abyssal plains it is
important to emphasize that any sudden
surge of sediment laden water can
deposit a bed w~lhall the characteristics
of a classical turbidite. A levee break in a
river, and a rip current transporting
sediment out across the continental
shelf would be two examples of this
Graded beds might be preserved In
either situation, but the two
environments would be characterized
by the dominance of fluvial and shelf
features, respectively. The presence of
rare "turb~dites"would indicate the
poss~bilityof density current activity, and
would not condemn the entire
sequences to deposition in great depths
of water.
Other Facies Commonly Associated
with Classical Turbldltes
Classical turbidites can be
characterized by three main features;
first, the beds tend to be laterally
extensive (hundreds of metres);second,
they tend to be parallel sided and vary
little in th~cknesslaterally (hundreds of
metres): and third, it 1s reasonableto use
Ihe Bouma model for this description
and interpretation. However, along with
classical turbidites there are other
M ~ S S Isandslone
V~
lac,es. Note lhrckness o i
bedsandabsenceolpel~Ocdrvrsron olBouma
Figure 7
'Dish' sliuclures, lormed by rapld
dewarerlng 01 a massrve sandsfone. Some of
the drsh edges curve upwardrnlo vertical
dewaler~ngp~pes
(arrow on photo).
Ordovrclan Cap Enrage Formation, near SISlrnon. Quebec.
29
Figure 8
G,,~ilt,dbedof pebbly sandslone, followed
abruprly by a second bed wrlhour a pe1,Irc
d~vrsionSt-Damase Formalron(Ordovraan)
near Kamousaska, Ouebec
Figure 9
Peublv 13ndsI0nc. Idcies showmg m~d!urn
SLrile cross bedding i n isolalron lhrs
Pholograph could easlly be conlused wrlh a
Pholograph01lluv,algravels but ul lac1,s
INVERSE TO -
GRADED-BED
GRADED-
STRATIFIED
NORMALLY
DISORGANIZED-
GRADED
BED
NO
NO GRLlOlNG
NO INVERSE
7
NO INVERSE
GRADING
STRhT.
CRUSS-STRbT
IMBRICATED
THESE THREE
RELATIVE
NO INVERSC
GRADlNG
NO STRbT
IMBRICATED
STRAT
IMBRIChTEO
GRADlNG
NO STRAT
lMBRiC RARE
MODELS
SHOWN IN SUGGESTED
POSITIONS DOWNCURRENT
Figure 10
Four models tor resedimented(deep wafer)
conglomerates. The graded-slratlhed,
Flgure 11
Graded-sfral!lied conglomerale. CambroOrdovlcran Cap Enrag6 Formalron at Bic.
Quebec. Basal conglomerate grades up info
FABRIC
%
ROLLING ON BE0 ABOUT
0 - (LONG) AXIS
FLOW
FLOW
NO ROLLING POSSIBLE
IN THIS ORIENTATION
Flgun 12
Conlrasl&Ween cwglomerafefabric
produced by rollrng clasls on fhe bed (long
axis transverse to Vow) with typical labric in
resedimenledconglomerates(norolling, long
axis DaraNel lo tlowl.
.~
~~
~~
~~
FEEDER CHANNEL
sLUw
CONGLCMERATES
R W I SSTS
YAOOlVE 5111
CHLMNEL \
PlOXlYIL
\/
OUTER FAN
D(STAL
NO mL.II"c
%.LC
il.LI0
Figure 13
Submarrnelanenv~ronmenralmodelSeelexl
lor IuNdrscuss~onD - 8 is disorgan~zed-bed
conglomerale model D F is debns flow
oakum
FACIES
33
SEQUENCE
INTERPRETATION
L
SL.
F-U
D.F.
CHANNEL FILL
CGL
CGL
INNER FAN
\./
1
MS.
F-U
P.S.
(CGL)
M.S.
P.S.
CHANNELLED
PORTION
OF
SUPRAFAN
LOBES
CHANNELLED
C-U
C.T.
a
u
I !
SMOOTH
M.S.
cn
2
a
LZ
C-u
C.T.
-II
C.T.
c-U
SMOOTH
PORTION
OF
SUPRAFAN
LOBES
0
2
V)
-ir
C.T.
c-U
OUTER FAN
FININQ- OR
COARSENINGUPWARD
Fiaure 14
n , p ,mcr ca s.or.,a, nc rho srrar yrdpn c
)E )..once ~ 1 3 o
. 0 0~., fan .~rour3gar
!,n
.
C T ,classical lurbndite.M S . , massrve
sandstone, P.S.,pebbly sandstone; D F
Flgure 15
Porllon of large channel cutting rnto shales Channel trll consals of drsorganrzed-bed
conglomerates and lenlrcular sandstones, with an overallth,nnmg- andfmmg-upwardsequence
Ordovrcran Grosses Rocks, Ouebec, Apoalachrans
2. Appalachian area
Enos. P ,1969. Anatomy of aflysch. Jour.
Sed Petrol.,v. 39, p. 680-723. (Note thts
IS the classlc paper on the Cloridorme
Formation.)
Parkash. 8.. 1970. Downcurrent
changes in sedimentary structures In
Ordovtctan turbldtte greywackes Jour
Sed Petrol.. v. 40, p. 572-590.
Parkash. B. and G V Middleton. 1970.
Downcurrent textural changes in
Ordovician turbidite greywackes.
Sedimentology.v. 14. p. 259-293 (Note:
these two papers by Parkash are
detalled studies of the Cloridorme
Formation.)
Flgure 16
E i ?mole of a lhrnnlng and ltning upward
sesuence (see f cgure 141 from (he Cambro
Ordovicran Cap Enrag6 Formatron near SISimon The conglomerate (lower rrghll
1. Precambrian turbidites
Walker. R. G. and F. J. Pettijohn. 1971
Archean sedimentation: analysis of the
Minnitaki Basin, northwestern Ontario.
Canada: Geol. Soc Am. Bull.. v. 82.
p. 2099-21 30.
35
Figure 17
6. Fleld Guidebooks
Hubert. C. M.. 1969. ed.. Flysch
sediments in parts of the CambroOrdovician sequence of the Ouebec
Appalachians Geol. Assoc Can..
Guidebook for field trip 1, Montreal. 38 p.
Riva. J.. 1972. Geology of theenvironsof
Ouebec City: Montreal, Internatl. Geol.
Cong.. Guidebook 8-1 9,53 p.
S. Julien. P., C. Hubert. W. B. Skidmore
and J. Beland. 1972. Appalachian
structure and strattgraphy, Ouebec:
Montreal, lnternatl. Geol. Cong.,
Guidebook A-56.99 p,
Harris. I. M.. ed.. (in press). Ancient
sediments of Nova Scotia. Eastern
Section. Soc Econ. Paleonl. Min..
Guidebook, ;n Maritime Sediments (to
appear in v. 11, numbers 1.2 and 3).
Sciectad RderHlces
B.ric
This list is intentionally very brief. It is
intended to serve as basic reading for
those wishing to read further in various
aspects of turbidites and associated
coarse clastics in their basinal setting.
~~