Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
c
College of Urban Construction and Safety Engineering, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing 210009, China
b
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 24 August 2013
Received in revised form 4 August 2014
Accepted 6 August 2014
Available online 27 August 2014
Keywords:
Ammonia water
Numerical
Falling-lm absorption
Nanouid
a b s t r a c t
In the last years the ammonia-water refrigeration cycle has been gradually improved by using nanouid
technology. In this work, a numerical model for the absorption of ammonia on a falling lm was developed for different ammonia-water mixtures containing nanoparticles and dispersants. The variation of
both falling lm thickness and physical properties of the mixture were considered to nd the best tting
model. Results show that when absorption pressure decreases or when initial concentration of mixture
increases, the relative intensity of effect on absorption rate is weakened by the variation of thermal
conductivity but enhanced by the variation of mass transfer coefcients and ow resistance, while the
variation of mixtures viscosity exhibits very low effect. When the results are compared to similar experimental data for the ammonia falling lm absorption with nanouids, it was found that the heat and mass
transfer are mainly affected by the lm drag reduction and its physical properties. The numerical model
obtained can be used for calculating the absorption rate of ammonia-water-nanouid mixtures with
acceptable accuracy, since 87% of relative errors are lower than 20%.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Ammonia water absorption refrigerators have recaptured scientists attention due to the phenomenon of global warming and
ozone depletion. However, the performance of the absorption cycle
needs to be improved because it is lower than the performance of
the vapor compression refrigeration system. Since the size and performance of the absorber can signicantly impact on the systems
overall performance, the latest research have focused on the
absorption enhancement unit. Generally, there are three methods
to enhance the efciency of heat and mass transfer of absorbers:
the mechanical treatment, the chemical treatment, and nanotechnology [1].
A nanouid is dened as a liquid suspension of particles whose
diameter are smaller than 100 nm. As a result of the limitation of
heat transfer in a working uid, solid particles are dispersed
throughout it to improve its thermal properties as well as its heat
transfer coefcient. In recent years, nanouids have been gradually
used as engineering uids because of their superior performance
Corresponding author at: Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and
Control of Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China. Tel.:
+86 25 83793214.
E-mail address: windy4ever@163.com (L. Yang).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.08.016
0017-9310/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
242
L. Yang et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 79 (2014) 241250
Nomenclature
u
v
g
Cp
Dm
T
P
K
mab
Dhab
M
S
Re
Sc
Greek letters
q
density, kg m3
C
ow rate, m3 s1
n
mass concentration of uid, %
d
lm thickness, mm
k
thermal conductivity, W (m K)1
g
dynamic viscosity, Pa s
s
m
Super/subscripts
i
vaporliquid interface
in
inlet of falling lm
w
cooling water
r
relative
n
nanouid
f
baseuid
ff
falling lm
s
solutions in containers and distributor
a
Fig. (a)
b
Fig. (b)
c
Fig. (c)
Abbreviations
AS
absolute slope of the tting straight line about absorption rate
RS
relative slop, dened by the ratio of absolute slope to
the absorption rate when kr (or gr, Kr, sr) = 1
2. Model descriptions
The physical model and mathematical model introduced herein
are similar to our previous studies on numerical model of falling
lm absorption with ammonia-water affected by a magnetic eld
[24]. The difference in this work is that the magnetic eld is
replaced by a nanouid, considering the changes in the mixtures
ow and its physical properties when nanoparticles and dispersants are added. The detailed description about the physical model
and mathematical model are presented at the end of this section.
2.1. Physical model
In conventional water-cooled absorption cooling devices, the
solution ow takes place on the external surface of horizontal
tubes in conventional falling lm conguration of the absorber.
However, wettability of the falling lm affects the heat and mass
transfer performance greatly. In order to observe, check and adjust
the wettability of the falling lm all through the experiment, the
shell of the main body of the absorber is made up of transparent
acrylic glass. Therefore, to observe the conditions of solution lm
distribution in real-time through the transparent shell of the
243
L. Yang et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 79 (2014) 241250
The main parameters of the falling lm and the tube the following: the outer and inner diameter of the tube is 25 and 22 mm,
respectively. The length is 1000 mm. The mixing area is evenly
divided into 2000 2000 mesh (in the direction of falling in the
direction of lm thickness). A standard operating condition is
employed to investigate the inuence of operating conditions
and the physical properties of nanouids on the heat and mass
transfer of ammonia falling lm absorption process. Parameters
of the standard operating condition are listed in Table 1.
The standard operating condition is dened according to the
previous experimental operating conditions [20]. The experimental
operating condition is set to ensure the absorption process continuously proceed in all section of the falling lm along the tube.
Otherwise, if the solution is saturated and the absorption process
stops before the end of the tube, the enhancement of nanouids
on the absorption performance cannot be veried from the saturated solutions. When the absorption process continuously proceed in all section of the tube, the operating condition is set to
obtain a more obvious difference results between the ammonia
water and ammonia water nanouid.
To study the effect of the physical properties of nanouids on
the performance of absorption, it was dened a set of the following
relative variables: relative thermal conductivity, relative viscosity,
relative mass transfer coefcient and relative ow resistance of
nanouids. Their corresponding equations are:
@qu @qv
0
@x
@y
qu
@u
@u
@
qv
@x
@y @y
1
@u
qg
@y
@n
@n
@
@n
qv
qDm
@x
@y @y
@y
x 0; u u0 uin ;
v 0;
T T in ; n nin
y 0; u v 0; T T w ;
@n
0
@y y0
@u
@T
0; Pv FT i ; ni const; k
@y yd
@y yd
qDm @n
mab Dhab jyd ; mab
1 n @yyd
gr gn =gf
K r K n =K f
10
sr sn =sf
11
@T
@T
@
@T
qC p u qC p v
k
@x
@y @y
@y
qu
kr kn =kf
y d;
Table 1
The operating conditions employed as a standard of reference.
Item
Tin (C)
Cin (m3/s)
nin (%)
Tw (C)
Cw (m3/s)
P (MPa)
Value
20
0.00001
15
0.00007
0.1
L. Yang et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 79 (2014) 241250
0.4504
0.734
0.4500
0.4496
0.733
0.4492
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
0.928
0.927
1.484
1.483
0.926
1.482
0.925
1.4
0.9
1.0
0.4050
0.2460
0.4045
0.2458
1.1
1.2
AS
-1
0.2462
1.0
-1
0.4060
0.4055
0.9
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.481
(b)
heat of absorption
bsorption rate
Linear fit of absorption rate
0.2464
1.1
(a)
0.2466
1.486
1.485
1.3
1.4
(c)
0.007
A Sa
A Sb
A Sc
RS
0.9
1.487
heat of absorption
absorption rate
Linear Fit of absorption rate
0.929
0.735
heat of absorption
absorption rate
Linear fit of absorption rate
0.4508
244
RSa
RSb
RSc
0.00 7
RSb=0.00636
RSa=0.00471
RSc=0.00451
A Sc=0.00589
0
ASa=0.00111
A Sb=0.00212
0
(d)
Fig. 2. Inuences of thermal conductivity on the absorption rate in different working conditions. (a): In reference condition; (b): in 0.2 MPa absorption pressure; (c): in 15%
initial concentration of falling lm; (d): comparisons of AS and RS.
245
L. Yang et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 79 (2014) 241250
0.50
0.7
0.45
0.40
0.6
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.6
1.0
1.5
1.4
0.9
1.3
0.8
0.7
1.3
1.2
0.8
0.9
0.40
0.25
0.35
0.20
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.3
1.2
1.3
A Sc=-0.1912
-1
0.45
1.1
0.30
(c)
A Sa=-0.3526
A S b=-0.7174
AS
0.30
1.0
-1
0.50
absorption rate
heat of absorption
0.9
1.0
(b)
(a)
0.8
1.7
-1
-1
1.1
-1
A Sa
A Sb
A Sc
RS
0.8
1.8
absorption rate
heat of absorption
0.8
-1
0.55
0.35
1.2
0.9
absorption rate
heat of absorption
-1
0.60
-1
R Sa
R Sc
R Sb
R Sa= -0.7837
R Sb=-0.7741
R Sc= -0.7766
(d)
Fig. 3. Inuences of viscosity of nanouids on the absorption rate in different working conditions. (a): In reference condition; (b): in 0.2 MPa absorption pressure; (c): in 15%
initial concentration of falling lm; (d): comparisons of AS and RS.
the variation of RS showed in the picture of Fig. 4(d) is very different form the two previous nonouids physical parameters (thermal conductivity and viscosity). RSc has the highest value, which
reveals that incrementing the mass transfer coefcient has greater
impact on the absorption performance, under the operating condition of higher initial concentration of nanouids. It also reveals
that the inuence of absorption pressure on the absorption rate
is not signicant, because RSa is just a little bigger than RSb. Therefore, in plain words, the mass transfer coefcient has greater effect
under the working condition of weaker absorption performance. A
possible reason for this circumstance can be explained as follows:
when the absorption performance is weaker, the mass transfer
coefcient is the main factor of resistance to the absorption process. The enhancement of mass transfer coefcient can play an
important role when absorption is weak. However, when the
absorption performance is higher, the mass transfer coefcient
takes a secondary role in resisting absorption. Consequently, the
enhancement of mass transfer coefcient has less importance at
that moment.
the decrease in ows velocity and its volumetric rate. Hence the
Reynolds number decreases, which eventually causes the diminution of heat and mass transfer performance.
The comparison between the slopes AS and RS, shown in
Fig. 5(ac), is resumed in Fig. 5(d). It can be seen that AS is almost
proportional to the base number of absorption rate of each
operating condition. The same behavior is observed for thermal
conductivity, viscosity and mass transfer coefcient. In the insert
picture of Fig. 5(d), it is clear that the operating condition has similar inuence over the RS to that of thermal conductivity but different to that of mass transfer coefcient. It can also be seen In
Fig. 5(d) that RSb has the highest value, which reveals that the
relative ow resistance has greater impact on absorption performance at higher pressure. The absolute value of RS is very high
and the ows resistance has more impact on absorption than
mixtures other physical properties. Therefore, the absorption performance can be more greatly improved in higher absorption pressure. Especially for some kind of nanouids which cause a drag
reduction effect when are combined with a surfactant [26].
L. Yang et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 79 (2014) 241250
1.10
0.75
0.44
0.70
0.65
0.40
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
0.90
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
Kr
Kr
(b)
0.40
0.36
0.22
1.1
1.2
1.3
ASa
ASb
ASc
1.3
1.3
RSa
RSb
RSc
RSa=0.45046
RSc=0.50884
RSb=0.43202
ASb=0.40034
ASa=0.20265
ASc=0.12525
0
Kr
1.2
RS
AS
-1
0.44
0.24
1.0
-1
1.4
0.85
0.60
0.26
0.9
1.5
0.95
(a)
absorption rate
heat of absorption
0.8
1.6
1.00
0.28
-1
-1
1.05
1.7
absorption rate
heat of absorption
0.48
-1
0.80
0.85
absorption rate
heat of absorption
0.52
-1
246
(c)
(d)
Fig. 4. Inuence of mass transfer coefcient of nanouids on the absorption rate in different working conditions. (a): In reference condition; (b): in 0.2 MPa absorption
pressure; (c): in 15% initial concentration of falling lm; (d): comparisons of AS and RS.
M Mff M s
12
M ff K ff Sff
13
M S K S SS
14
K ff
D
v2
1=3
Ks
D
v2
g
1=3
Mff
17
In our previous experimental studies, to obtain the suitable
nanouids applied in ammonia absorption refrigeration system,
20 types of nanoparticles mixed pairwise orthogonally with 10
types of surfactants were added in ammonia-water, respectively
to observe the dispersion stability of suspension and hereby obtain
the functioning surfactant for each type of nanoparticles [28]. Then
three kinds of nanoparticles (Al2O3, ZnFe2O4, Fe2O3) with SDBS as
dispersant were selected and employed in the comparative experiments of ammonia absorption based on an overall consideration of
stability, viscosity and other physical properties [20]. The preparation, selection and ingredient of nanouids, as well as the comparative experimental results can be referenced in our previous
experimental studies about preparation and ammonia absorption
performance of nanouids [20,2931].
Fig. 7 shows the absorption rate at different initial ammonia
concentrations in order to make possible the comparison between
the model data, raw experimental data, and trimmed experimental
data. When is considered the absorption in containers and distributor, the raw experimental data seem to be below the model data,
and seem to be above without considering the absorption. However, when the model calculates the absorption rate, considering
the initial concentration of water, the data results are concordant
with raw and trimmed experimental data. As a result of the models assumptions and the errors in the experiments, measurements
and calculations, the disparity between the model and the experiments is unavoidable. However, the model is deemed to be used
for approximately design the absorber vessel since the relative
errors are within 20%.
247
L. Yang et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 79 (2014) 241250
0.6
0.8
0.5
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
-1
absorption rate
heat of absorption
1.4
1.2
1.6
1.0
1.2
0.8
0.6
1.3
0.8
0.9
1.0
(a)
0.20
0.3
0.15
1.1
1.2
0.8
1.3
-1
ASb= -1.6532
RSc= -1.4351
-1
ASa
ASb
ASc
0.2
1.3
RSa
RSc
RSb
RS
0.4
0.25
ASa= -0.7501
AS
0.5
0.30
1.0
1.2
ASc= -0.3533
-1
absorption rate
heat of absorption
0.9
1.1
-1
Absorption rate (g s )
0.6
0.8
(b)
0.40
0.35
2.0
-1
Absorption rate (g s )
1.0
-1
0.7
1.6
absorption rate
heat of absorption
-1
Absorption rate (g s )
0.8
(c)
RSa= -1.6673
RSb= -1.784
(d)
Fig. 5. Inuence of ow resistance of nanouids on the absorption rate in different working conditions. (a): In reference condition; (b): in 0.2 MPa absorption pressure; (c): in
15% initial concentration of falling lm; (d): comparisons of AS and RS.
0.8
12
Model data
Raw experimental data
Regulated experimental data by Eq(17)
11
-1
13
0.7
10
9
8
7
3
14
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
5
1
15
Figs. 810 show the comparison between the model data and
trimmed experimental data for the absorption rate at different initial ammonia concentration when the Al2O3, ZnFe2O4 and Fe2O3
nanouids are employed. It can be seen that, for each kind of
nanouid, there are great errors between the model and the raw
10
15
248
L. Yang et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 79 (2014) 241250
0.9
1.2
-1
-1
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
Model data
Raw experimental data
Regulated experimental data by Eq(17)
0.3
0.2
10
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
15
Model data
Raw experimental data
Regulated experimental data by Eq(17)
0.8
0.6
0.4
10
15
10
15
Fig. 10. The comparisons between the model data, raw experimental data, and
regulated experimental data about absorption rate in different initial ammonia
concentration of Fe2O3 nanouids.
0.4
-1
1.0
Model data
Raw experimental data
Regulated experimental data by Eq(17)
0.2
0.0
-0.2
-0.4
Water
Al2O3
ZnFe2O4
Fe2O 3
Fluid types
Fig. 11. The relative errors for each kind of nanoudis in different initial ammonia
concentration.
absorption at the interface of solution in containers and distributor, 87.5% of the relative errors are within 20% and the maximum
is 21.5%. However, if the absorption at the interface of solution in
containers and distributor are not taken into account, the relative
errors between model and raw experimental data are much greater
because 62.5% of the relative errors exceed 20% and the maximum
reaches 36.9%.
In our previous experimental study, to observe the conditions of
solution lm distribution in real-time through the transparent
shell of the absorber all through the experiment, the transparent
shell is made up by acrylic glass. To ensure the strength and security of the experimental unit, the experimental was not carried out
for higher ammonia concentration of uids which matched with
higher absorption pressure. It can be found by experiment or
model that the ammonia absorption rate decreases with the
increase of the ammonia concentration in initial uid. Therefore,
to obviously comparing the ammonia absorption performance
between nanouids and pure ammonia water, the experiments
were carried out with lower ammonia concentration uid. In this
paper, the results of higher ammonia concentration uid can also
be calculated. However, as a result of the value of model calculation cannot yet be veried by our experimental results, the results
of higher ammonia concentration uids are not listed in this paper.
The improvement of absorption rate by nanouids is mainly as
a result of drag reduction and the physical properties of nanouids.
In previous studies of some researchers [5,6,20,26,31,32], the
increase of thermal conductivity, the decrease of viscosity and drag
reduction are found in some kinds of nanouids. These variations
in the nanouids properties may be caused by the rod-shaped
micelles formed by surfactants [3337] and the smoothing effect
on the solid surface caused by the nanoparticles [26]. The experimental results showed that when the ammonia mass fraction of
initial nanouid increases, the absorption potential capacity
decreases, but the enhancing effect induced by the nanouid is
greater than the effect without nanoparticles [20].
Broadly speaking, the model presented herein includes some
physical factors that impact on the absorption performance of
ammonia falling lm absorption outside vertical tube when
249
L. Yang et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 79 (2014) 241250
2.0
-1
Model data
Heat absorbed by falling film (experimental)
Heat absorbed by cooling water (experimental)
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.0
-21.22%
-0.2
-0.4
0.0
Water
Al2O3
ZnFe2O4
Fe2O3
Water
Fluid types
Al2O3
ZnFe2O4
Fe2O3
Fluid types
(a)
(b)
Fig. 12. The comparisons of the absorption heat (a) and relative errors (b) between the model and experimental data in 0% initial ammonia concentration nanouids.
250
L. Yang et al. / International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 79 (2014) 241250