Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
and must be 250 words they must be informal and you must comment on 2 peoples
works and must be a minimum of 50 words and also 6 hours before class.
1. There is literal meaning
2. Clear communication doesnt exist
3. No one can read your mind
4. Repeat yourself but dont be Redundant
Free writing
the reading was primarily about how the conscious and the unconscious are linked
because even though there is a scientific debate about how the two are not linked in
actuality the two are very much linked the science and the humanities are divided
on because the science cannot fully explain the conscious and that is why the
sciences and humanist are in a so called feud about this topic this book thing was
about how science and counsous are not two seperate two seperate things but that
they are somehow link into being one entity that is what the atricle is discussing
and that was about it i wish this book was about history but for the most part it
wasnt as bad as a read as the other book we had to read the logical steps in this
book was much eaiser to understanand that is one aspect of the book a liked also i
think the author might have had past experiences with cid i just get the type of
feeling and why did he care about man so much never understood why everything
has to be such a philosophical debate.
Neural Darwinism
1. Sectional system (lots of variation)
2. Lots of path's
3. Re-entry
Brain regions --> maps
Brain signals go from region 1 and region 2 and back again constantly
Power source
Chapter 3, 4, 5
Dualism- is the split between the mind and body the minds mental and the body
physical
Compare and contrast between Edelman vs niche you should not simply do a
compare and contrast essay but make a solid thesis
Niche conciseness language knowing vs Edelman consensus neural Darwinism
Chapter 7 post
Different types of truths like scientific investigation logical and mathematical truths
and then established truth of history and laws. (69, beginning)
Epistemology look
Humans have a different u understanding of themselves than nature (70, Begging)
(72, begging) there is a split between human sciences and natural sciences
(72, middle) Alfred whitehead philosophy of organ to get around split
Edelman different criteria for each valid truth
Scientific truths- Valid
Logical/mathematical- Valid
Culture and history Establishment of historical fact
5) Then contrast Edelman and niche account for memory we can assume
Edelman is right and we want to see how much niche got right
Iraq war changed over time is because the focus of the country shifted from security to the
economy after the 2008 financial recession then the iraq war turned into a big money waster
Nostalgia
Triumphs
Its better to paraphrase than use quotes
Make a roadmap on what the papers is about
General
Specific
Public memory
Case study
Why do we remember things differently?
Why do we remember the moon landing differently now
Introduction
Deception Then/Now
Values Then/Now
Analyzes theoretically how value can change
Analyze then/now
Establish the problem
Focus on the problem how the Iraq war affected public memory in the U.S
Tell us then
Tell us now
Orient me to the material
Focus me on part of the material
Synthesis the aspects .l
Tell us what we now know of the event
What does this tell us about public memory?
Synthesis the aspects
State then concisely together
State the implication of ^
Your arguments is telling the reader how to see something
Collective Memory
Biological
Cultural
Wednesday the 18th English paper is duemm
Add 2 sources on emoryh