Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
On
O
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
om
:E
-N
SU
.C
Research Report
On
Marketing Strategies to Increase the Sales of Agora
SU
.C
om
Name
:E
-N
Prepared By:
ID
2005-2-10-034
2005-2-10-044
2005-2-10-068
Rakib Azad
2005-2-10-150
Abdullah-Al-Mahmood
2005-2-10-058
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
Date of Submission :
19th April, 2009
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
19th April 2009
Md. Farhan Faruqui
Senior Lecturer
Department of Business Administration
East West University.
Dear Sir,
In accordance to your advice to conduct a marketing research, we selected Agora and
.C
SU
To serve our purpose, we have followed standard methodology to extract our findings. We
have applied our knowledge from Marketing Research course (MKT414). As per the
-N
direction from you, we have tried our best to develop the marketing strategies to increase the
om
:E
sales of Agora.
Fr
We hope that this report will fulfill the requirements suggested by you under the course.
ol
le
ct
ed
Sincerely yours,
Name
ID
Signature
2005-2-10-034
_____________
2005-2-10-044
______________
2005-2-10-068
______________
Rakib Azad
2005-2-10-150
_______________
Abdullah-Al-Mahmood
2005-2-10-058
_______________
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
First of all, we thank to almighty Allah, who have provided us the brilliant opportunity to
build and complete this report successfully.
We would like to express our feelings and great affections with our heartiest appreciation.
We would like to thank to our honorable teacher Md. Farhan Faruqui who helped us by
giving valuable advice and experiences.
We are doing this research on analysis about the marketing strategies to increase the sales of
Agora, as a part of our Marketing Research (MKT-414) course conducted by Md. Farhan
Faruqui .We want to show our gratification to the administration of Agora to provide and
help us to conduct this research, and also we would like to thank to those respondents who
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
om
:E
-N
SU
.C
helped us by giving their opinion, attitude and perception in the questionnaire survey.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This research study investigates about the marketing strategies to increase the sales of Agora.
So we tried to find out the strengths and weakness of Agora based on some important
criterias like product-quality, price, service, location, layout, brand-image, etc. We used
primary data as our research input and secondary data to support our findings. We found that
most of the customers go to Agora for the fresh & hygienic products and convenient location.
Most of them are from upper-middle class. We choose 50 samples to conduct our research
survey. We basically used SPSS program for the data analysis. We concluded our
interpretation by analyzing all factors related to our research. There are some specific
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
om
:E
-N
SU
.C
objectives in carrying out research on the proposed topic which belong to broad objective.
Table of Content
Introduction
Origin of the report
Objective of the Report
Methodology
TOPIC
PAGE
1
1
1-2
2
2
3
3-4
4
4
4
Research Process
.C
Sample
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
om
:E
-N
SU
4
5
5
5
6
6
6
7
7
8
9
10
11
12-14
15-16
17-18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
INTRODUCTION
Rahimafrooz Superstores Ltd. (RSL) made a breakthrough in the urban lifestyles by
launching the first retail chain in the country named Agora. Currently there are four Agora
outlets at Gulshan, Dhanmondi, Moghbazar and Mirpur in Dhaka. With many more coming
up at important locations in Dhaka and other major cities, Agora is endeavoring to fulfill the
everyday shopping needs of the urbanites through fair price, right assortment, best quality
and service.
While Agora mainly focuses on food items - ranging from a wide variety of fish, meat,
vegetables, fruits, bakery, cookies, - it also carries a vast array of other household, personal
care, such as cosmetics and miscellaneous products. At any point in time, there are nearly
.C
30,000 different products available. RSL is committed to sustaining and growing as the most
:E
-N
SU
om
We have been assigned to do marketing research to create relation between our study and the
Fr
real life scenario, so we choose Agora to develop marketing strategies to increase its sales.
This report was assigned by our honorable course instructor Md. Farhan Faruqui. We are
ol
le
ct
ed
studying Marketing Research (MKT-414) course and we have prepared this report according
to our study. We tried our best to give our effort and concentration to prepare this report.
Marketing Research Problem:Broad Objective :- To find out the strength and weakness of Agora
and its competitors.
Specific Objective:
To identify the criteria that consumers use when selecting Super Store.
To know that how consumers evaluate Agora and its competitors based
on their choice criteria.
To find out those stores those are patronized when shopping for specific product
categories.
SU
.C
:E
-N
Agora.
Fr
METHODOLOGY
om
ol
le
ct
ed
The research study is based on primary and secondary source of information. From the
primary source, we get the basic information about the choice criterias of the customers to
choose Superstore. We have basically used SPSS program for the analysis of data of 50
samples. We conclude our interpretation by analyzing all factors related to our research.
LIMITATIONS
In preparing the report we faced several difficulties for gathering appropriate information and
other related issue.Many problems rose while making this report. These are as follows:
Some respondents did not participate properly according to our expectation.
Secondary source is limited in some factors.
Time shortage
HYPOTHESES
The hypotheses were developed to test the positive or negative effects of the
variables:-
SU
.C
-N
H0: Customers are satisfied about the price of the goods of Agora.
:E
om
Fr
H0: Agora has strong brand image in the mind of the customer.
ol
le
ct
ed
Research Process:
Exploratory Research : At first, we used exploratory research to identify the different choice
criterias of the customers. This research also helped us to find out the main competitors of
.C
SU
research is one kind of conclusive research design. Our Sample size was 50. Our research
Primary data :-
Fr
(i)
om
:E
-N
questionnaire-survey.
Secondary data :- We collected secondary data from Internet, and we also took
ol
le
ct
ed
(ii)
some help from the past research works to successfully accomplish our research.
Data Analysis:
Testing each hypotheses individually performs data analysis and standard statistical technique
has been be applied. We analyzed the data through the SPSS program.
Sample:
We selected randomly 50 respondents as the sample from the total population. Our
respondents were both male and female. They have the experience to purchase from different
superstores.
10
Price:
Price is the process by which consumers translate price into meaningful cognitions, and it has
interested researches for several years. Consumers want to get highest utility from a brand or
any product, which they purchase by sacrificing benefit from other competitive brands. In our
study, price is one of the choice criterias, based on which consumers choose Agora. We find
that most of the consumers of Agora come from well-off family and their income level is in
upper middle class. Other than conventional market price in Agora is bit higher but their
pricing strategy is matched with their service and quality provided. Generally price conveys
.C
information to the consumer about product quality. The importance of price as a function of
SU
perceived quality has been extensively studied more than any other factors in this sphere.
-N
Consumers think that high price of product means that quality of that product will be high.
:E
Price can play both role as an indicator of the amount of sacrifice needed to purchase a
om
product and an indicator of the level of quality. So the consumers of Agora think that they are
Fr
getting good quality product within reasonable price, so they like to shop from Agora.
ol
le
ct
ed
Convenient Location:
Location is the most crucial part for shopping. In everywhere of the world, the more close the
market the more customer can visit the market. Therefore, it is one of the most important
choice factors for the consumer to shop from market. It is better for customer to find out
superstore near to him/her. Some customers go to a superstore only for location. It should be
very much convenient for the customer. Agora has only four branches in Dhaka, so there are
lots of complaints about their outlet. The customers who have the ability and affordability to
shop from Agora can get the benefit from Agora only for location. Few loyal customers who
like Agora very much, they can travel a long distance for getting the benefit. Normally people
look for nearest superstore to visit and it should be in their locality. We find that, In Agora
most of the customers come from within two kilometres of distance from their home or
working place. So we consider location as the most vital choosing factor for Agora.
11
Attractive Layout:
Attractive layout is an important factor for shopping. Agora's layout is really very much
attractive. So it is creating a good impact on the consumers' mind. Layout means interior
decoration. Moreover, the loyal customers have expectation that Agora will fulfill their
demand. Agora is trying to provide the quality atmosphere and standardized outlet as
international standard.
Service:
Service is very much important to choose superstore like Agora. The more good service they
provide the more customers they will get. All over the world, service is the most considered
.C
billing,
SU
packing, providing information about the product, behavior of the employees, etc.We find
that most of the customers of Agora talk about service first, then they gradually focus on the
-N
other factors. Good Serviceability can create a organization one of the good one. So service is
om
:E
Fr
Quality:
ol
le
ct
ed
Quality is the most important factor. If any person doesn't get quality-product from a well
reputed superstore, then his/her perception towards that superstore goes down. Quality of a
product means the ability of a product to satisfy a consumer's needs and wants. Agora's
product-quality is very good, because its products are fresh and hygienic. When consumers
are convinced with the quality of a product, then they evaluate the product and service
positively.
12
RESEARCH FINDINGS
DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS:
Age :60
50
M
O
.C
30
SU
Percent
40
:E
-N
20
Fr
om
10
ol
le
ct
ed
0
20-30
30-40
40-50
20-30
Frequency
28
Percent
56.0
Valid Percent
56.0
Cumulative
Percent
56.0
30-40
15
30.0
30.0
86.0
100.0
age
Valid
Age
40-50
14.0
14.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
Interpretation:
Most of the customers of Agora are between 20-30 years old. 56% of the total respondents
are fall in this group. On the other hand only 30% respondents go to Agora which has the age
range of 30-40 years. The rest 14% respondents go to Agora which has the age range of 4050 years. So Agora should focus on the respondent who is the age of 20-30 years .
13
Gender :-
60
50
30
.C
Percent
40
-N
SU
20
male
female
Fr
om
:E
10
ol
le
ct
ed
gender
Gender
Percent
48.0
Valid Percent
48.0
Cumulative
Percent
48.0
female
26
52.0
52.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
male
Valid
Frequency
24
Interpretation:
Both male and female go to Agora. So we randomly took both male and female customers for
survey purpose. According to our survey, 52% are female and 48% are male who go for
shopping to Agora.
14
20
Percent
30
-N
SU
.C
10
0
less then
10000
:E
.00
om
Fr
.00
Percent
10.0
Valid Percent
10.0
Cumulative
Percent
10.0
16.0
16.0
26.0
18.0
18.0
44.0
19
38.0
38.0
82.0
16.0
16.0
98.0
2.0
2.0
100.0
50
100.0
100.0
ol
le
ct
ed
Valid
Frequency
5
less then
10000
1000020000
2000030000
3000040000
4000050000
Total
Interpretation:
Monthly income is a major factor for visiting Agora. It needs a relatively high income to
afford its expense. It is the class where its customers targeted by income group. It is seen that
most of the respondents have the income range of tk.20000-30000. It is the portion of 38%.
So Agora should focus on this segment.
15
PSYCHOGRAPHIC FACTORS
Media preference:70
60
40
Percent
50
SU
.C
30
:E
-N
20
om
10
Fr
0
tv chanel
Fm_ radio
newspaper and
Magazine
others
ol
le
ct
ed
Valid
tv chanel
Fm_ radio
newspaper and
Magazine
others
Total
Frequency
33
Percent
66.0
Valid Percent
66.0
Cumulative
Percent
66.0
8.0
8.0
74.0
10
20.0
20.0
94.0
100.0
6.0
6.0
50
100.0
100.0
Interpretation:
Here we see that, maximum customers (66%) like TV channel. So, advertisement about
Agora should be given more on TV channel.
16
60
50
30
Percent
40
SU
.C
20
:E
-N
10
0
12pm_3pm
3pm-6pm
6pm-9pm
9pm_12pm
after 12 pm
Fr
om
Valid
ol
le
ct
ed
6pm-9pm
9pm_12p
m
after 12
pm
Total
Frequency
Percent
4.0
Valid Percent
Cumulative
Percent
4.0
4.0
6.0
6.0
10.0
11
22.0
22.0
32.0
28
56.0
56.0
88.0
12.0
12.0
100.0
50
100.0
100.0
Interpretation:
Here, we see that 56% customers watch TV at 9pm-12pm. 22% customers watch TV at 6pm9pm. Maximum customers watch TV at night. So advertisement should be given more at
these time intervals.
17
why do you go to
agora(attractive
layout)
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
om
:E
-N
SU
.C
why do you go to
agora( strong
brand image)
Valid
Frequency
22
Percent
44.0
Valid Percent
44.0
yes
27
54.0
54.0
98.0
4.00
2.0
2.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
no
Interpretation: 54% customers go to Agora, because its products are fresh and hygienic. It is
the strength of Agora.
18
Valid
no
Frequency
49
Percent
98.0
Valid Percent
98.0
Cumulative
Percent
98.0
2.0
2.0
100.0
50
100.0
100.0
yes
Total
.C
Agora.
Percent
80.0
Valid Percent
80.0
Cumulative
Percent
80.0
yes
10
20.0
20.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
no
:E
Frequency
40
om
Valid
-N
SU
100.0
Fr
Interpretation: 20% customers go to Agora, because they believe that the store-personnels
ol
le
ct
ed
of Agora are helpful. But the another 80% don't believe such, So it's also a weak point of
Agora.
Price is satisfactory
Valid
Frequency
31
Percent
62.0
Valid Percent
62.0
Cumulative
Percent
62.0
yes
19
38.0
38.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
no
Interpretation: 38% customers go to Agora, because they are satisfied about the price of its
products. But the another 62% are not satisfied, So it's also a weak point of Agora.
19
Convenient location
Valid
Frequency
29
Percent
58.0
Valid Percent
58.0
Cumulative
Percent
58.0
yes
21
42.0
42.0
100.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
no
Interpretation:
another 58% customers are not satisfied about its location. It's the combination of it's strength
& weakness.
yes
8.0
50
100.0
SU
Cumulative
Percent
92.0
8.0
100.0
100.0
om
Total
Valid Percent
92.0
-N
no
Percent
92.0
:E
Valid
Frequency
46
.C
Attractive layout
Fr
Interpretation: 8% customers go to Agora because of its attractive layout, but the another
ol
le
ct
ed
92% customers are not satisfied about its layout. So it's also a weak point of Agora.
Valid
no
Frequency
37
Percent
74.0
Valid Percent
74.0
Cumulative
Percent
74.0
100.0
yes
13
26.0
26.0
Total
50
100.0
100.0
Interpretation: 26% customers go to Agora because of its strong brand image, but the
another 74% customers don't contain its strong brand image in their mind. So it's also a weak
point of Agora.
20
Mean
Difference
Upper
49
.000
.62000
.4220
.8180
why do you go to
agora(store personnel are
knowledgeable)
1.000
49
.322
.02000
-.0202
.0602
why do you go to
agora(store personnel are
helpful)
3.500
49
.001
.20000
.0852
.3148
why do you go to
agora(price is satisfactory)
5.480
49
.000
.38000
.2407
.5193
why do you go to
agora(convenient location)
5.957
49
.42000
.2783
.5617
why do you go to
agora(attractive layout)
2.064
49
.044
.08000
.0021
.1579
4.149
.000
.26000
.1341
.3859
-N
.000
Fr
om
49
ol
le
ct
ed
HYPOTHESIS TESTING :
.C
6.293
Lower
SU
Sig. (2-tailed)
:E
why do you go to
agora(fresh and hygienic)
df
We state the null and the alternate hypothesisH0: Store-personnels are knowledgeable.
H1: Store-personnels are not knowledgeable.
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
why do you go to
agora(store personnel
are knowledgeable)
t
1.000
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
49
.322
Mean
Difference
.02000
Lower
-.0202
Upper
.0602
Interpretation: After conducting the analysis we can see that Sig.(2-tailed) is 0.322, which is
in the acceptance area. So the null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is
rejected. That is, Store-personnels are knowledgeable.
.
21
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
We state the null and the alternate hypothesisH0: Store-personnels are helpful .
H1: Store-personnels are not helpful.
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
df
3.500
Sig. (2-tailed)
49
Mean
Difference
.001
Lower
.20000
.0852
Upper
.3148
why do you go to
agora(store personnel
are helpful)
-N
SU
.C
Interpretation: After conducting the analysis we can see that Sig.(2-tailed) is 0.001, which is
in the rejection area. So the null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is accepted.
That is, Store-personnels are not helpful.
:E
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
om
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
why do you go to
agora(attractive layout)
t
2.064
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 0
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
49
.044
Mean
Difference
.08000
Lower
.0021
Upper
.1579
Interpretation: After conducting the analysis we can see that Sig.(2-tailed) is 0.044, which is
in the rejection area. So the null hypothesis is rejected and alternative hypothesis is accepted.
That is, The layout of Agora is not attractive.
22
Preference about Agora when buying grocery / bakery & cookies / cosmetics
products :
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
t
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
Mean
Difference
Lower
Upper
-2.011
49
.050
-.30000
-.5997
-.0003
-1.827
49
.074
-.26000
-.5460
.0260
-.387
49
.700
-.3714
.2514
:E
-N
SU
.C
-.06000
om
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Fr
ol
le
ct
ed
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
t
-2.011
df
Sig. (2-tailed)
49
.050
Mean
Difference
-.30000
Lower
Upper
-.5997
-.0003
Interpretation: After conducting the analysis we can see that Sig.(2-tailed) is 0.050, which is
in the acceptance area. So the null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is
rejected. That is, Agora is more preferable to customers when buying grocery products.
23
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
We state the null and the alternate hypothesisH0: Agora is more preferable to customers when buying bakery & cookies.
H1: Agora is not more preferable to customers when buying bakery & cookies.
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 2
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
df
-1.827
Mean
Difference
Sig. (2-tailed)
49
.074
Lower
-.26000
Upper
-.5460
.0260
.C
Interpretation: After conducting the analysis we can see that Sig.(2-tailed) is 0.074, which is
SU
in the acceptance area. So the null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is
:E
-N
rejected. That is, Agora is more preferable to customers when buying bakery & cookies.
om
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Fr
ol
le
ct
ed
Test Value = 2
df
-.387
Sig. (2-tailed)
49
.700
Mean
Difference
-.06000
Lower
-.3714
Upper
.2514
Interpretation: After conducting the analysis we can see that Sig.(2-tailed) is 0.700, which is
in the acceptance area. So the null hypothesis is accepted and alternative hypothesis is
rejected. That is, Agora is more preferable to customers when buying cosmetics products.
24
( Correlations )
why do
you go to
agora(con
venient
location)
why do
you go
to
agora(at
tractive
layout)
why do
you go
to
agora(
strong
brand
image)
.079
-.087
.013
-.119
-.158
.062
.587
.548
.928
.412
.272
.668
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
.079
.286(*)
-.112
.168
-.042
.241
.587
.044
.771
.092
50
50
-.087
.286(*)
.548
.044
why do you go
to agora(store
personnel are
helpful)
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
why do you go
to agora(price is
satisfactory)
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
50
50
50
.227
-.020
.221
-.068
.114
.889
.123
.637
50
50
50
50
50
-.112
.227
.085
.073
-.276
.439
.114
.557
.615
.052
50
50
50
50
50
50
-.119
.168
-.020
.085
-.102
-.135
.412
.244
.889
.557
.483
.350
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
-.158
-.042
.221
.073
-.102
-.175
.272
50
.771
50
.123
50
.615
50
.483
50
.
50
.225
50
.062
.241
-.068
-.276
-.135
-.175
.668
.092
.637
.052
.350
.225
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
.013
om
.928
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
N
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
50
50
Fr
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
why do you go
to agora( strong
brand image)
50
ol
le
ct
ed
why do you go
to
agora(attractive
layout)
50
N
why do you go
to
agora(convenie
nt location)
.244
N
50
* Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
.439
.C
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
SU
why do you go
to agora(store
personnel are
knowledgeable)
why do
you go
to
agora(p
rice is
satisfact
ory)
-N
Pearson
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed)
why do
you go to
agora(stor
e
personnel
are
helpful)
:E
why do you go
to agora(fresh
and hygienic)
why do
you go to
agora(fre
sh and
hygienic)
why do you
go to
agora(store
personnel
are
knowledge
able)
Interpretation:
Fresh & hygienic product is weak-positively (0.062) correlated with going to Agora.
Knowledgeable store-personnel is weak-positively (0.241) correlated with going to Agora.
Helpful store-personnel is weak-negatively (-0.068) correlated with going to Agora.
Price satisfaction is weak-negatively (-0.276) correlated with going to Agora.
Convenient location is weak-negatively (-0.135) correlated with going to Agora.
Attractive layout is weak-negatively (-0.175) correlated with going to Agora.
25
N of Items
3
.C
Item-Total Statistics
Scale
Variance if
Item Deleted
3.220
Corrected
Item-Total
Correlation
.400
Cronbach's
Alpha if Item
Deleted
.512
7.5600
2.904
.464
.412
belief agora(
convenient location)
7.5400
3.723
.367
.557
-N
:E
om
SU
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
7.6200
Fr
There is a high consistency among these three choice criteria (status, service, convenient
ol
le
ct
ed
26
t
4.650
Sig.
.000
.151
-.306
-2.135
.038
.154
-.094
-.616
.541
.152
-.291
-1.876
.067
.169
-.014
.020
-.093
.926
.141
.889
om
:E
-N
.024
belief agora(
-.323
price)
belief agora(
-.095
status)
belief agora(
-.286
service)
belief agora(
convenient
-.016
location)
belief agora(
attractive
.003
layout)
Dependent Variable: usually i purchase from
Beta
B
4.299
.C
(Constant)
SU
Model
1
Standardized
Coefficients
Interpretation:
Agoras price effects the customers' purchase from Agora because significance
Fr
ol
le
ct
ed
Agoras status doesnt effect the customers' purchase from Agora because
significance(0.541) > 0.05
Agoras
service
Agoras convenient location doesnt effect the customers' purchase from Agora
because significance(0.926) > 0.05
Agoras attractive layout doesnt effect the customers' purchase from Agora because
significance(0.889) > 0.05
27
Model
1
(Constant)
B
3.849
Standardized
Coefficients
Std. Error
.740
Beta
Sig.
.000
-.171
-1.238
.222
-.012
-.080
.936
-.467
-3.118
.003
.048
.340
.735
-.042
-.309
.759
Model Summary
R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
om
Model
1
:E
-N
SU
.C
belief agora(
-.150
.121
price)
belief agora(
-.010
.124
status)
belief agora(
-.380
.122
service)
belief agora(
convenient
.046
.135
location)
belief agora(
attractive
-.006
.019
layout)
a Dependent Variable: the next time i will purchase from agora
t
5.202
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Interpretation:
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
.519(a)
.270
.187
.86415
a Predictors: (Constant), belief agora( attractive layout), belief agora( status), belief agora( price), belief agora(
convenient location), belief agora( service)
28
Unstandardized
Coefficients
Lower
Bound
Upper
Bound
1.003
.321
-.417
1.244
.020
.064
.702
.141
-.098
.667
.610
-.219
.369
.566
-.244
.441
.437
2.418
.190
.298
1.498
.146
.081
.C
.158
SU
.412
Sig.
-N
.514
.170
.100
.578
ol
le
ct
ed
Interpretation:
Fr
.413
agora sells
fresh and
.383
hygienic
products
i like the
service of
.284
agora
convenient
location is
.075
impt for
shopping
getting all
products in
one shop
.098
provides
extra value
Dependent Variable: i like to shop at agora
Beta
:E
(Constant)
Std.
Error
om
Model
1
95% Confidence
Interval for B
Selling fresh and hygienic product effects the respondents likeness to shop at
Agora because significance (0.020) < 0.05
The service of Agora doesnt effect the respondents likeness to shop at Agora
Getting all products in one shop doesnt effect the respondents likeness to shop
at Agora because here significance (0.566) > 0.05
29
16
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
om
:E
-N
SU
.C
66
10
Valid
agora
minabaz
ar
PQS
Frequency
33
nandan
Total
Percent
66.0
Valid Percent
66.0
Cumulative
Percent
66.0
10.0
10.0
76.0
8.0
8.0
84.0
16.0
16.0
100.0
50
100.0
100.0
Interpretation:
From the above graph and table, we can see that 66% respondents usually purchase from Agora.
10% respondents usually purchase from Minabazar.
8% respondents usually purchase from PQS.
16% respondents usually purchase from Nandan.
30
The store personals of Agora should be more knowledgeable and helpful to the
customer. They should increase their sense of responsibility to give more service to
the customer. The store personnels' communication skill should be developed so that
the customers being satisfied at them.
The price of the product of agora is very high. So its price should be reduced at
The layout of Agora should be more beautify, attractive, neat and clean to attract the
.C
reasonable level.
-N
the product varieties. Respondents prefer Agora for grocery, bakery & cookies, and
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
om
:E
cosmetics products.
SU
customer. Their internal space should be large enough to walk more freely.
31
Reference:
www.agorabd.com
Practical Survey
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
om
:E
-N
SU
.C
32
Research questionnaire
Marketing Strategies to increase the sales of Agora
We are the students of East West University. As a part of our Marketing Research course,
we are supposed to prepare a research report on Marketing Strategies to increase the sales of
Agora. To prepare this report, we need to conduct a questionnaire survey. We can assure
you that the data collected through this questionnaire will be used only for academic purpose.
.C
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-above
SU
1. Age -
:E
Male
Female
om
-N
2. Gender -
Yes
No
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
5. Occupation
Housewife
Private sector
Public sector
Others _________
TV-channel
FM-radio
Newspaper & magazine
Billboard ad.
Others ______________
12pm-3pm
3pm-6pm
6pm-9pm
9pm-12am
after 12am
SU
.C
Traveling
Gossiping with friends
Shopping
Watching TV
Others__________
-N
om
:E
Price is satisfactory.
Convenient Location.
Attractive Layout.
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
Agora
Mina Bazar
PQS
Nandan
34
Agora
Mina Bazar
PQS
Nandan
13. Place mention the following four Superstores according to your belief in the five
places given below :
(a) Agora.
2 1
-N
(d) Nandan.
SU
.C
(c) PQS.
High Price
High Status
Low Status
Good Service
Poor Service.
Convenient Location
Not Convenient
Attractive Layout
Not Attractive
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
om
:E
Low Price
35
14. Place your level of agreement with the following statements by placing a tick mark.
Neutral
(3)
Disagree
(2)
Strongly
Disagree.(1)
Agree
(4)
-N
SU
Strongly
Agree (5)
.C
Criteria
:E
om
Probably
Not sure
Probably Not
Definitely Not
ol
le
ct
ed
Fr
36