1

J.

( )

je
(

( )
( )

.
,

( )

,
.

1.
,
1991:136-137).

(
1985;

1991;

1991).
.

,
(

*
1
2

,
( .

1976, 2004;

ing)

;
)

to be,

veranva@gmail.com
:

. 178002

.).

, 41/1,

.
to have.3

2012.,

( .

. 141-155.

.
,

,
,

( .

2007).

.
(

,
(

).5

1976).

,
,

( .

1980 : 45) .

,
.

*
/

.*
(
); )

.).
(

),
,

: )
(
) 8; )

,
)

1977 : 682).6

2004: 9).

.).

,
,

.
.
2.
,
.

1981)
(eventuality).

( .
,

( .

a
(
2000,
1967,
1979,
2005).
6
T ru t ut ts s tt t s t tr. A ts prpst, trr, t r
tu, t , t rr t s pt r pr t t t pt
terms of the zero-point of utteranc. (
1977 : 682).
7
Ltrv I st tps qu st r s u stut (
1980 : 45).
8
.
5

.).

,
1992: 98;
.

.
(

).

( .
2007).

(
1976 : 45,

1957 ;

,
,

).

),

1991 : 192;

( .

, .
1979: 528 ;

. 2005: 781).

)
1991: 121 ;
,

?
.10

.
3.

( )

.
1991: 192;

( .

1957;

,
1976: 45,

1991: 121;

pendant X temps
,
en X temps
: Il a dormi pendant deux heures
(*en deux heures) / Il a crit la lettre en dix minutes (*pendant dix minutes).
:
2008 .
10
,
,
(
. 2005),
,
, .
,
,
:
;
,

(
.
2005: 803-812).
11
,
,
.
,
.

2007).11

.12

( .

(
(

2008,

13

2008 ). Ta ,

1953: 116).

,
13

,
,

.
(
,

.)

( . 5):

.)

,
(3).

1) Il fumait. (
.)
2) A ce moment-l il fumait. (
3) Avant, il fumait beaucoup plus. (

. 2005:

1)

-ait

( . 4),

),

) (

1979).
,

(2)

( .

fumer,

12

)
(

781).

( )

,
,

.
...,
,

(fumer)

.
(
)

1953 : 136).

,
.
crire une lettre crire
des lettres,
.

(Il a crit des lettres pendant deux heures

/ *en deux heures)

(Il a crit une lettre en deux heures / *pendant deux heures).

,
,
:
marcher
,
marcher jusqu la rivire
,
jusqu la rivire.
,
( .
1993,
2006,
2008 ).

4) Il fuma pendant 10 ans. (

5) Il fuma lge de 13 ans. (
4)
5)
( .

13

),

2006),

.
, .
,
. 2004),
en deux heures (

).

( . 8).

16

7)
8)

. (*
. (*

, .

).
.

).
).
.

pendant deux heures

(
,
(
)

).
7)

15

.)
)

1985;

( .

Il sortait quand le tlphone sonna. (

16

6):

15

6)

14

.)

14

.
.

(=

.
-

,
,

: 1.
2.

.
,

9)

.
,

10):
,

9)
10)

. (*

:
.

11)
12)
13)
14)
15)
16)

.
.
.

,
(

( .

.
(

: )
,

), )
,
(

;
)

1953 : 101).

),

...

), )

,
1953 : 105),
;

,
.18

),

(
(

).17

17

18

. (*

,
1967: 333-334).
,

.19

,
,

.
a
18)

17)

19):

17)
18)

/*

.
./*

17),
18).

.( .2
.( .
,
20)
, .

,
,

19)

20)
.

./*
./*

19

,
.

21)

22)

.
.

for two hours ((

.

,
,

21)
22)
,
in two hours (

)
,

.
o

19)

:
19)
20)

).
,

;
(

),

,
:

,
,
,

.
.

;
,

.
).

,
20

(
,

4.
,

,
.
,

( )

,
(

).

.
(

).

.
,

,
(

2009;

2008 , 2010).

, 2009: 68),

).
(

,
( .
)

(
.

,
.

20

2008;

23)

,
.
18),

, 2010).

23)

,
24)
.

25),
,

9
.

24)
25)
,

.
,

21

,
.

5.
(
(

,
.

1972;

,
,

,
.

,
,

: *

.
,

.
.

,
.

22

,
.

21

1994),

( .

,
.

.22

1983;
,

),

. 2005: 802-812)

10
).23
.

.24

,
,

,
(

.).
(

,
(

, .
.)25.

1967 : 346).
,

( . 26
( . 28

26)
27)
28)
29)

,
.

1979 : 528).

1979: 532).
.),

,
(

.
.

1953: 111),

(1953),
,

,
27).
29).
.

.
.

23

24

(
25

(
).

,
,

),
,
.

11

(
,

30)
31)

)
.

.
31)

(30
.

32

33)

.
.

32)
33)

6.
( .

( .

)
)

,
.

1.
(
(

,
)

,
,

,
...

.
,

),

,
,

,
,

.
:

,
...

12

1981: . Bach, On Time, Tense and Aspect: An Essay in English Metaphysics, in: P. Cole
(ed.) Radical Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press.
2000: .
,
,

:
,
13,

,
,

.
1991 : R. Binnick, Time and the Verb. A Guide to Tense and Aspect, New York
Oxford, Oxford University Press.
. 2004: A. Borillo, M. Bras, A. Le Draoulec, A. Molendijk, H. De Swart, H.
Verkuyl, Co Vet, C. Vetters et L. Vieu, Tense and aspect., Handbook of French Semantics,
ed. by Henriette De Swart and Francis Corblin,. Stanford: CSLI Publications; 233350.
1972: H. Verkuyl, On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.
1993: H. Verkuyl, A theory of aspectuality: the interaction between temporal and
atemporal structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
1980: Co Vet, Temps, aspects et adverbes de temps en franais contemporain, Genve:
Droz.
1967: .
,
,

,
.
1957: H. B. Garay, Verbal aspect in French, Language 33, pp. 91-110.
1953: .
,
,
,
.
1985: . Dahl, Tense and Aspect Systems, Basil Blackwell, Oxford New York.
1991: R. Declerck, Tense in English, London and New York, Routledge.

2007: I. Depraetere, (A)telicity and intentionality, Linguistics, Vol. 45, Issue 2, pp.
243269.
1976: B. Comrie: Aspect, An introduction to study of verbal aspect and related problems,
Cambridge University press.
2004: B. Comrie: Tense, Cambridge University press .
1977: J. Lyons, Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

2006: P. Novakov Types of Verb Situations in English and in Serbian, Romanian

Journal of English Studies 3, Editura Universitatii de Vest: Timisoara, pp. 143-149.

. 2005: .
, .
, .
, .
, .
, .
,

:
,
,
,
,

,
,
. 345 475.
2007: H. de Swart, A cross-linguistic discourse analysis of the perfect, Journal of
pragmatics, 39(12), 2273-2307.
1983: C. Smith, A theory of aspectual choice, Language 59, pp. 479-501.
1991: C. Smith, C. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
,
1992: .
.
,
,

.
2008:
.
,
:
,
, 37/1,
,
, 99-111.
,
2006: V. Stanojevi, T. Ai, L'aspect lexical, morphologique et
grammatical - le jeu des perles de sens, Primenjena lingvistika 7, Beograd - Novi Sad, 98-109.

13
,

2008 : .

, .

,
, 207-219.
, .
,
,
,
.
,
2010: V. tv & T. A, Lspt imperfectif en franais et en
serbe, Interprter les temps verbaux, eds. Nelly Flaux, Dejan St, C Vt, Peter Lang,
Frankfurt, 107-129.
1979:
.
,
II,
,
,
.
2005: .
,
, :
.
, .
, .
, .
, .
, .
,
:
,
,
,
,

,
,
. 345 475.
2009: .
,
,
,
.
1994: C. Tenny, Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
1985: . Hinrichs A compositional semantics for aktionsarten and NP reference.
Ph.D. dissertation: Ohio State University.
(
,

?
)

,
2008 : .

Veran Stanojevi
PERFECTIVITY AND TELICITY IN SERBIAN IN COMPARAISON WITH THE
SITUATION IN FRENCH
Summary
In this paper we examine the relationship between the perfective (or imperfective) aspect and the
telicity (or atelicity) of the action denoted by predicate in Serbian and in French. In French these are two
independent categories, since the grammatical aspect is encoded by the inflection, whereas the (a)telicity
is expressed by the verbal base. In this work we show that in Serbian the telicity and the atelicity
constitute an aspectual category independent of the grammatical aspect. Moreover, we show the
applicability of the telicity / atelicity distinction to the description of the syntactic facts of Serbian and reexamine the existing definitions of the perfective and imperfectve aspect.
Key words: verbal aspect, perfectivity, imperfectivity, telicity, atelicity.