Dimension

Excellent
(96-100%)

Highly
Satisfactory
(91-95%)

Satisfactory
(85-90%)

Mastery

The presenters had

a full knowledge on
their topic. There
was a chronological
arrangement of data.

The presenters had

sufficient knowledge of
their topic. There was a
chronological
arrangement of data.

The presenters had

enough knowledge of
the topic but lack
some information.

The presenters
had limited
information and
some details
were confusing.

Presentati
on

The presentation
was delivered. The
presenters had well
modulated voice.
The presenters
observed proper
gestures at all times.

The presenters had well

modulated voice but
sometimes stuttered.
There were minimal
extra body movements
that could be seen. The
presenters has
confidence when he
presented.

The presenters had

modulated voice but
stuttering voice was
visible. There were
extra gestures
sometimes that
disturbs the
presentation.

Content

The topic were

discussed
accurately. The
presentation was
specific and
completely detailed.
The presenters were
able to present the
data on time. Handouts were given
on/before the
presentation.
Cooperation among
the members were
evident.
Creative,
presentable and
attractive. Topics of
the presentation
were given to
everyone fonts used
were clear and
understandable.

Most of the data are

presented. Information
were sufficient enough
for the topic to be
comprehended.

Information were
limited. Some
arguments arose due
to some inaccuracy of
data presented.

The presenters had

finished the topic on
time. Most of the
members took a part in
the presentation.
Cooperation was visible
among the members.

Some of the topics

were rushed due to
lack of time.
Cooperation among
the members lack.

Creative, attractive and

understandable. Topics
of the presentation were
fairly given to everyone.
Contents were implicit.
Fonts used were
cleared.

Readable but
inappropriate font size
and font style with
some misspelled
words and
typographical errors.

The
presentation
was not well
delivered. The
presenter
stuttered and
extra gestures
had become
the point of
attention. Lack
of confidence
was observed.
Information
were lacking in
content and
context. Some
data were
questionable.
Some of the
topic were not
discussed due
to improper
time
management.
Most of the
members did
not cooperate.
Presentable
enough. Some
fonts were hard
to understand
due to improper
sizes and
usages.

Time of
Presentati
on and
Valuing

Hand-outs/
Visual Aids

Fair
(78-84%)

Needs
improvement
(78-79%)
The presenters had
insufficient knowledge
of their topic. The
details of the
presentation were
confusing.
It was evident that the
presentation was
hurriedly done.
Presenters were
unprepared.
Information given
were incomplete.

Presenters were truly

lacking and
incomprehensive.
Data were
misinterpreted and
misunderstood.
Topics were not
discussed due to lack
of time. Only few took
part of the lesson.
Commotions/argume
nts were visible
among members.
Not presentable and
attractive. Fonts were
not readable.
Handouts were not
given at all.