Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 6 February 2007
Received in revised form 28 July 2008
Accepted 31 July 2008
Keywords:
Empirical
Shell and coiled tube
Heat exchanger
Experimental
Correlation
a b s t r a c t
In the present study, the heat transfer coefcients of shell and helically coiled tube heat exchangers were
investigated experimentally. Three heat exchangers with different coil pitches were selected as test section for both parallel-ow and counter-ow congurations. All the required parameters like inlet and
outlet temperatures of tube-side and shell-side uids, ow rate of uids, etc. were measured using appropriate instruments. Totally, 75 test runs were performed from which the tube-side and shell-side heat
transfer coefcients were calculated. Empirical correlations were proposed for shell-side and tube-side.
The calculated heat transfer coefcients of tube-side were also compared to the existing correlations
for other boundary conditions and a reasonable agreement was observed.
2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Heat exchangers are used in a wide variety of applications
including power plants, nuclear reactors, refrigeration and airconditioning systems, automotive industries, heat recovery systems, chemical processing, and food industries [13]. Besides
the performance of the heat exchanger being improved, the heat
transfer enhancement enables the size of the heat exchanger to
be considerably decreased. In general, the enhancement techniques can be divided into two groups: active and passive techniques. The active techniques require external forces like uid
vibration, electric eld, and surface vibration. The passive techniques require special surface geometries or uid additives like
various tube inserts. Both techniques have been widely used to
improve heat transfer performance of heat exchangers. Due to
their compact structure and high heat transfer coefcient, helically coiled tubes have been introduced as one of the passive heat
transfer enhancement techniques and are widely used in various
industrial applications.
Several studies have indicated that helically coiled tubes are
superior to straight tubes when employed in heat transfer applications [4,5]. The centrifugal force due to the curvature of the tube
results in the secondary ow development which enhances the
heat transfer rate. This phenomenon can be benecial especially
in laminar ow regime. Thermal performance and pressure drop
of a shell and helically coiled tube heat exchanger with and without helical crimped ns have been investigated by Naphon [6].
* Tel.: +98 311 391 5210; fax: +98 311 391 2628.
E-mail addresses: salimpour@cc.iut.ac.ir, m_salimpour@yahoo.com.
0894-1777/$ - see front matter 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.expthermusci.2008.07.015
204
Nomenclature
surface of coiled tube, m2
coil pitch, m
constant of Eq. (2)
Prandtl number, = lCP/k
curvature radius, m
unknown constants
coiled tube diameter, m
shell diameter, m
shell-side hydraulic diameter, m
Dean number, = Re(d/2Rc)0.5
averaged convective heat transfer coefcient, W/m2 K
Helical number, = De/(1 + c2)0.5
thermal conductivity, W/m2 K
heat exchanger length, m
exponent in Eq. (2)
N
Nu
Re
U
v
Greek letters
d
curvature ratio, = d/2Rc
c
dimensionless pitch, = b/2pRc
l
viscosity, kg/m s
q
density, kg/m3
Subscripts
i
inside condition
o
outside condition
Nui hi di =k;
0:5
He De=1 c2 0:5
De Rei di =2Rc ;
Nuo ho Dh =k
D2 2pRc d2o c1
D2pRc do c1
2Rc
Fig. 1. Schematic view of a typical shell and coiled tube heat exchanger.
A
b
C
Pr
Rc
C1,. . .,C4
d
D
Dh
De
h
He
k
L
n
205
related to the inner and outer heat transfer coefcients by the following equation [14]:
Table 1
Characteristic dimensions of shell and coiled tube heat exchangers
Heat exchanger
di, mm
do, mm
D, mm
b, mm
L, mm
1
2
3
9
12
12
12
16
16
120
120
120
17.0
21.4
26.7
0.113
0.157
0.157
230
225
280
1
Ao
Ao lndo =di 1
U o Ai hi
2pkL
ho
where di and do are inner and outer diameters of the tube, respectively; k is the thermal conductivity of the wall; and L is the length
of the heat exchanger. After calculating the overall heat transfer
coefcients, the only unknown variables in Eq. (1) are the heat
transfer coefcients. By keeping the mass ow rate in the inner tube
constant, it is then assumed that the inner heat transfer coefcient
is constant. The outer heat transfer coefcient is assumed to behave
in the following manner with the uid velocity in the shell, vo:
ho Cvno
Substituting Eq. (2) into Eq. (1), the values for the constant, C, and
the exponent, n, were determined through curve tting. The inner
and outer heat transfer coefcients could then be calculated. This
procedure was repeated for each inner ow rate, coil size, and conguration. This resulted in 15 Wilson plots, and 15 inner heat transfer coefcients. For each Wilson plot, ve outer heat transfer
coefcients were calculated, i.e. totally 75 outer heat transfer coefcients were calculated.
The uncertainty analysis was performed by the method proposed by Schultz and Cole [15] for all experiments, and it was
found that the expected experimental error was within 8% for
all the runs.
Table 2
Range of operating parameters
Parameters
Range
0.0160.113 kg/s
0.0190.136 kg/s
33.453.2 C
23.544.9 C
10.919.2 C
14.637.3 C
206
80
70
60
Nui
50
40
30
20
10
coil 1
coil 2
coil 3
ref. 8, case I
ref. 8, case II
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
De
Fig. 3. Variation of coiled tube Nusselt number with Dean number.
Manlapaz and Churchill [8] are indicated by case I, and case II and
illustrated by solid lines and dash lines, respectively.
From this gure, it is seen that increasing the coiled tube pitch
will decrease the inner Nusselt number. This matter can be justied as the higher values of coil pitches correspond to the lower
values of Helical number or loose-coiling conditions. Therefore,
the heat transfer coefcients of these coiled tubes are closer to
those of the straight pipes expectedly. A comparison of the present
data with the previous correlations revealed that when coil pitches
are negligible, in low Dean numbers (De < 3000), the correlation of
constant temperature boundary condition predicts the present
data quite well; however, in high Dean numbers (De > 3000), this
correlation overestimates heat transfer coefcients. Also, the correlation pertained to constant heat ux boundary condition overestimates all the data of the present study.
Fig. 4 represents the variations of shell-side Nusselt number
with shell-side Reynolds number which was calculated based on
hydraulic diameter of the shell. From this gure, it is observed that
Nui C 1 DeC 2 Pr C 3 cC 4
Taking logarithm of Eq. (3), and introducing the data of Nui and the
corresponding De, Pr and c into it, an error function can be obtained
as
EC 1 ; C 2 ; C 3 ; C 4
N n
h
io 2
X
lnNui j ln C 1 C 2 ln Dej C 3 ln Pr j C 4 ln cj
j1
Fig. 5 shows the comparison between the predicted Nusselt numbers by the proposed correlation, Eq. (5), and the experimental Nusselt numbers.
70
70
60
60
Nuo
50
40
30
shell 1
shell 2
shell 3
20
10
50
40
30
20
10
0
100
200
300
400
500
Reo
Fig. 4. Variation of shell-side Nusselt number with Reynolds number.
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
70
60
207
50
40
30
References
20
10
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Investigating the literature, no correlation was found to evaluate the shell-side heat transfer coefcients of helically coiled tube
heat exchangers. Therefore, in the present study, one correlation
was developed to predict the shell-side Nusselt number as well.
To predict the shell-side Nusselt numbers of coiled tube heat
exchangers, a similar treatment to the inner Nusselt numbers
was done for the outer Nusselt numbers which led to the following
correlation with average error of 1.19%:
Nuo 19:64Re0:513
Pr0:129 c0:938
o
[1] W.H. Fleming, J.A. Khan, C.A. Rhodes, Effective heat transfer in a metalhydridebased hydrogen separation process, Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. 26 (2001)
711724.
[2] P.K. Sahoo, M.I.A. Ansari, A.K. Datta, A computer based iterative solution for
accurate estimation of heat transfer coefcients in a helical tube heat
exchanger, J. Food Eng. 58 (2003) 211214.
[3] J. Yi, Z.H. Liu, J. Wang, Heat transfer characteristics of the evaporator section
using small helical coiled pipe in a looped heat pipe, Appl. Therm. Eng. 23
(2003) 8999.
[4] L.A.M. Janssen, C.J. Hoogendoorn, Laminar convective heat transfer in helical
coiled tubes, Int. J. Heat Mass Tran. 21 (1978) 11971206.
[5] D.G. Prabhanjan, G.S.V. Raghavan, T.J. Rennie, Comparison of heat transfer rates
between a straight tube heat exchanger and a helically coiled heat exchanger,
Int. Commun. Heat Mass Tran. 29 (2) (2002) 185191.
[6] P. Naphon, Thermal performance and pressure drop of the helical-coil heat
exchangers with and without helically crimped ns, Int. Commun. Heat Mass
Tran. 34 (3) (2007) 321330.
[7] P. Naphon, S. Wongwises, A review of ow and heat transfer characteristics in
curved tubes, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 10 (2006) 463490.
[8] R. Manlapaz, S.W. Churchill, Fully developed laminar convection from a helical
coil, Chem. Eng. Commun. 9 (1981) 185200.
[9] C.E. Kalb, J.D. Seader, Fully developed viscous-ow heat transfer in curved
circular tubes with uniform wall temperature, AICHE J. 20 (1974)
340346.
[10] T.J. Rennie, Numerical and experimental studies of a double-pipe helical
heat exchanger, Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada,
2004.
[11] V. Kumar, B. Faizee, M. Mridha, K.D.P. Nigam, Numerical studies of a tube-intube helically coiled heat exchanger, Chem. Eng. Process. (2008), doi:10.1016/
j.cep.2008.01.001.
[12] I. Conte, X.F. Peng, Numerical investigations of laminar ow in coiled pipes,
Appl. Therm. Eng. 28 (2008) 423432.
[13] J.W. Rose, Heat-transfer coefcients, Wilson plot and accuracy of thermal
measurements, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 28 (2004) 7786.
[14] F.M. White, Heat Transfer, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc., New
York, 1984.
[15] R.R. Schultz, R. Cole, Uncertainty analysis in boiling nucleation, AICHE Symp.
Ser. 189 (75) (1979) 3238.