Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Integrated task 1.
In the reading passage it is stated that in 1950, the British
mathematician developed an experiment, called also the
Turning Test, which was supposed to clarify whether computers
can think or not. Thus, people who were taking part in this
experiment were put to communicate with an unknown source
from another room. These people had to decide whether the
answers received were from another person or from a robot, for
instance. If the answers were said to be given by a person or
people did not notice any differences , the computer would
eventually pass the Turning Test. This way, there have been
even organised numerous contests with a prize consisting in a
gold medal and $100.000, for the one who could have designed
such a brillinat computer. Yet, there has not been a winner.
However, the lecture challenges what the reading claims by
making several point on the validity of the Turning Test. The
professor points out that the test is actually based on behaviour
and not on the capacity of thinking. Therefore, he cites the
example of a paradox known also as the Chinese Room, which
concludes that an English-speaker can respond to Chinese
questions quite simply. The person can break the Chinese code
without any comprehension or understanding just referring to
source material. As a matter of fact, a computer could pass the
Turning Test if the computer had a complex imput based on
behaviour. Even so, the question would still remain ambigous as
the test would not prove whether a computer can think or not.
Integrated task.2
In the lecture the professor makes several points about the
effects of forest fires. The professor argues that forest fires can
do more good than harm. This is different from the reading
which states that the supression of forest fires is inevitably
needed.
Firstly, the lecturer states that forest fire are actually beneficial
to trees. He cites the example of tall, old oak trees that block
the light to get to young trees in order to allow them to grow.
This is different from the reading which claims that fire
supressions helps trees to live longer and healthier.
Secondly, another point made by the professor is that the
ground can eventually receive more nutrients if the forest fires
are not supressed. However, the reading passage claims that
the nutrients found in soil will diminish considerably due to
forest fires not being stopped. Therefore,the flora is said to be
affected considerably.
Thirdly, the professor states that the growing population of
animals such as deers does not actully bring any benefits to the
wilderness. He observes that deers often tend to eat the leaves
of oaks, not giving them the chance to grow and develop. The
reading contradicts the professors point by claiming that
through forest fires,animals are usually burned to the bone.
Thus, the number of their species reducing.
Overall, the lecture casts doubt on the points made by the
reading passage.
Essay no.3
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing
a game is fun only when you win.
Nowadays there is a hot topic upon the subject of games having
become a source of sadness and anger for each of us. Games
have lately appeared to have lost their main role. They seem to
have the tendency to develop into activities that no longer
provide entertainment. I am inclined to believe that games
maintain our vision towards life more optimisic , along with
more smiles on our faces.
Firstly, one cannot deny that games have been invented in
early times in order to escape from the hustle and bustle of our
everyday lives. Games are said to improve peoples moods by
making them laugh, cheer and socialise with others. Even so,
when playing a game you cannot always win. For instance,
there are chances for you to miss the lucky card, but this should
not change your perspective towards the game. You might lose,
but might also win.Consequently, we must always remember
that the main purpose of games is to produce delightment and
fun among people in a friendly environment. As
Secondly, there is no argue against the fact that games are also
a reliable source of life lessons. Not only do they teach us how
to win, but they also show us how to lose. Therefore, taking into
Essay no. 4
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is
more important for students to study history and literature than
it is for them to stucy science and mathematics.
Secondly, there is no argue against that fact that our lives have
been dramatically improved by the development of technology
through science and mathematics. Over the past years,
technology has reached an incredible level of performance.
These would not have been possible, if science along with
mathematichs had not taken part to this durable process.
Thinking how our ancestors lives were, without electricity,
potable water or other difficulties, science and mathematics
have definitely played major roles into changing this way of
living. For example, now it takes only 2 seconds to send
important files through Yahoo, while a decade ago, people
waited day or even months to get their requested documents.
Consequently, science and mathematics have always succeded
in exceeding our expectations.
On the other hand, a vast majority of people states that history
and literature help us develop as individuals. More precisely,
these two related subjects increase our inner power. Some
people point out that our imagination is developed and as a
matter of fact we become more creative and innovative
persons. Others claim that literature helps us decrease our
stress level, thus becoming more peaceful and happier.
Moreover, it is said that history is also a helpful tool as it offers
us different perspectives. People who study history are more
likely to avoid mistakes as they are able to learn from others
past. As a consequence, history and literature have
considerably huge impacts on our lives.
Summing up, I consider that neither of these four subjects is
less important that the other. I am convinced that as long as we
can balance the time studying for each other, we can benefit
from all four of them. As a consequence, studying science and
mathematics is as important as studying history and literature.
Essay. No 5
Some people choose friends who are different from themselves.
Others choose friends who are similar to themselves. Compare
the advantages of having friends who are different from you
with advantages of having friends who are similar to you. Which
kind of friend do you prefer for yourself? Why?
Nowadays there is a hot topic upon the subject of choosing the
people who surround you, whether they are different or similar
to you. Some people want to have a mirror of themselves, while
others go for their other extreme. I am inclined to believe that
this can be inferred as a personal choice and no one can
actually say one type of friend is better than the other.
Firstly, one cannot deny that having friends who are different
form you can bring considerably benefits. Being surrounded by
a wide range of personalities can only help you improve your
level of adaptation. You become inevitably more tolerant and
you might also learn to see the good parts in each person. Not
Essay no. 6
Decisions can be made quickly, or they can be made after
careful thought. Do you agree or disagree with the following
statement?The decision that people make quickly are always
wrong.
Nowadays there is a hot topic upon the subject of the best way
of taking a decision and thus some argue that decisions made
quickly are always wrong. While decisions can be made not only