Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Key words: egg weight, incubator position, hatchability, chick quality, broiler hatching egg
2008 Poultry Science 87:19131918
doi:10.3382/ps.2008-00014
INTRODUCTION
Long-term genetic selection has resulted in an enormous increase in the growth rate of broilers and evidently embryonic metabolism as Hulet and Meijerhof
(2001) reported that heat production of eggs from
modern broilers was substantially higher than that
reported in 1960. Furthermore, previous studies have
shown that large eggs did not hatch as well as small
eggs (Landauer, 1967; Ogunshile and Sparks, 1995;
French, 1997). Although there could be maternal effects and fertility could differ between large and small
eggs, French (1997) found that as egg mass increased
thermal conductance did not increase proportionally, so
larger eggs would be expected to have greater difficulty
losing embryonic metabolic heat as well as greater difficulty gaining heat during the initiation of incubation
2008 Poultry Science Association Inc.
Received January 9, 2008.
Accepted May 19, 2008.
1
The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement of the products mentioned nor criticism of similar products not mentioned.
2
Corresponding author: jbrake@ncsu.edu
1913
ABSTRACT Two experiments, which included 3 incubators, were carried out to investigate the effects of egg
weight and position relative to incubator (setter) fan on
embryonic mortality, second quality chicks, and fertile
hatchability of broiler eggs. Three egg weight groups
termed small (~62.4 g), average (~65.4 g), and large
(~68.9 g) were set in either the incubator trolley most
distant from the fan (FAR) or in the incubator trolley
nearest the fan (NEAR) as would be the case during
single-stage operation in this type of incubator. Fertile
hatchability decreased in the large egg weight group
due to increased percentage late embryonic mortality in
experiment 1, and both percentage early and late embryonic mortality in experiment 2. Percentage late embryonic mortality and second quality chicks increased
1914
1915
Figure 1. Design of the experiment showing the NEAR and FAR trolley relative to fan position and air flow. Within the trolley at each position, eggs were placed in the 3 egg weight groups (large, average, and small) to complete a 2 3 design.
1916
Table 1. The effect of egg weight and position relative to incubator fan on fertile hatchability of first quality chicks, second quality chicks, and
embryonic mortality in experiment 1
Variable
Fertile hatchability2
Second quality chicks2
Early dead
Mid dead
Late dead
Position
relative
to fan
NEAR
FAR
Mean
NEAR
FAR
Mean
NEAR
FAR
Mean
NEAR
FAR
Mean
NEAR
FAR
Mean
Egg weight1
Large
Average
Small
91.00 1.033
81.69 1.033
86.34 0.73b
1.15 0.533
4.58 0.533
2.86 0.36
3.93 0.54
5.37 0.54
4.65 0.38
0.22 0.15
0.57 0.15
0.40 0.10
3.00 0.523
6.87 0.523
4.94 0.37a
(%)
88.90 1.033
87.68 1.033
88.29 0.73a
1.91 0.533
2.36 0.533
2.13 0.36
4.24 0.54
5.10 0.54
4.67 0.38
0.14 0.15
0.43 0.15
0.29 0.10
3.96 0.523
3.79 0.523
3.87 0.37b
90.56 1.033
88.31 1.033
89.44 0.73a
1.55 0.533
2.51 0.533
2.03 0.36
4.52 0.54
4.35 0.54
4.43 0.38
0.49 0.15
0.28 0.15
0.38 0.10
2.25 0.523
3.57 0.523
2.91 0.37c
Position,
mean SE
90.15 0.60a
85.89 0.60b
1.53 0.29b
3.15 0.29a
4.23 0.31
4.94 0.31
0.28 0.08
0.43 0.08
3.07 0.30b
4.74 0.30a
Table 2. The effect of egg weight and position relative to incubator fan on fertile hatchability of first quality chicks, second quality chicks, and
embryonic mortality in experiment 2
Variable
Fertile hatchability2
Second quality chicks2
Early dead
Mid dead
Late dead
Position
relative
to fan
NEAR
FAR
Mean
NEAR
FAR
Mean
NEAR
FAR
Mean
NEAR
FAR
Mean
NEAR
FAR
Mean
Egg weight1
Large
81.73 1.45
78.82 1.45
80.27 1.02b
1.04 0.32
1.50 0.32
1.27 0.22
9.54 1.00
10.41 1.00
9.98 0.70a
1.26 0.21
0.83 0.21
1.05 0.15
5.93 0.753
8.10 0.753
7.01 0.52a
Average
(%)
86.06 1.45
84.54 1.45
85.30 1.02a
0.51 0.32
0.99 0.32
0.75 0.22
6.70 1.00
7.32 1.00
7.01 0.70b
0.99 0.21
0.17 0.21
0.58 0.15
5.21 0.753
5.98 0.753
5.59 0.52b
Small
87.09 1.45
86.43 1.45
86.76 1.02a
0.94 0.32
0.80 0.32
0.87 0.22
5.81 1.00
7.66 1.00
6.74 0.70b
0.32 0.21
0.78 0.21
0.55 0.15
4.88 0.753
3.21 0.753
4.05 0.52b
Position,
mean SE
84.96 0.84
83.26 0.84
0.83 0.18
1.10 0.18
7.35 0.57
8.46 0.57
0.86 0.12
0.59 0.12
5.34 0.43
5.76 0.43
a,b
Main effect means SE for egg weight and position effects that possess different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05). There were 5
replicate trays of 150 eggs each used for each interaction mean set in a single incubator.
1
Mean egg weights from 58-wk-old flock were 62.4, 65.3, and 68.8 g for the small, average, and large groups, respectively.
2
Calculated based upon the number of first quality or second quality chicks hatched per 100 fertile eggs set.
3
There was a significant (P 0.05) interaction of egg weight and position effects as shown by the respective interaction means.
a,b
Main effect means SE for egg weight and position effects that possess different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05). There were 10
replicate trays of 150 eggs each used for each interaction mean divided equally among 2 similar incubators.
1
Mean egg weights from 51-wk-old flock were 62.5, 65.6, and 69.0 g for the small, average, and large groups, respectively.
2
Calculated based upon the number of first quality or second quality chicks hatched per 100 fertile eggs set.
3
There was a significant (P 0.05) interaction of egg weight and position effects as shown by the respective interaction means.
NEAR
1917
sulted with larger old flock eggs but not smaller young
flock eggs in such an experiment (Elibol and Trkolu,
2001), suggesting a discrete egg size threshold, consistent with the present and previous reports.
FAR
b
38.7 0.1
38.8 0.1b
38.6 0.1b
39.4 0.1a
38.8 0.1b
38.8 0.1b
a,b
Elibol, O., and M. Trkolu. 2001. Effect of single and multistage incubation systems on hatching performance of broiler breeders eggs. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 25:335340.
French, N. A. 1994. Do incubation temperature requirements
vary between eggs? Proc. 9th Eur. Poult. Congr., Glasgow,
UK. Vol. II:395398.
French, N. A. 1997. Modeling incubation temperature; the effects of incubator design, embryonic development and egg
size. Poult. Sci. 76:124133.
French, N. A. 2001. Temperatures in a tunnel incubatorA
long term study. Avian Poult. Biol. Rev. 12:184186.
French, N. A. 2002. The critical importance of incubation
temperature. Pages 1720 in Practical Aspects of Commercial Incubation. D. C. Deeming, ed. Ratite Conference
Books, Lincolnshire, UK.
Hulet, R., G. Gladys, D. Hill, R. Meijerhof, and T. El-Shiekh.
2007. Influence of egg shell embryonic incubation temperature and broiler breeder flock age on posthatch growth
performance and carcass characteristics. Poult. Sci.
86:408412.
Hulet, R. M., and R. Meijerhof. 2001. Real time incubation
temperature control and heat production of broiler eggs.
Poult. Sci. 80(Suppl. 1):128. (Abstr.)
Kaltofen, K. S. 1969. The effect of air movements on hatchability and weight loss of chicken eggs during artificial incubation. Pages 177190 in The Fertility and Hatchability
of the Hens Egg. T. C. Carter and B. M. Freeman, ed.
Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, UK.
Landauer, W. 1967. The hatchability of chicken eggs as influenced by environment and heredity. Monograph 1 (Revised), Univ. Conn. Agric. Exp. Stn., Storrs, CT.
Leksrisompong, N., H. Romero-Sanchez, P. W. Plumstead,
K. E. Brannan, and J. Brake. 2007. Broiler Incubation. 1.
Effect of elevated temperature during late incubation on
body weight and organs of chicks. Poult. Sci. 86:2685
2691.
Lourens, A., R. Molenaar, H. van den Brand, M. J. W. Heetkamp, R. Meijerhof, and B. Kemp. 2006. Effect of egg size
on heat production and the transition of energy from egg
to hatchling. Poult. Sci. 85:770776.
Lourens, A., H. van den Brand, R. Meijerhof, and B. Kemp.
2005. Effect of eggshell temperature during incubation on
embryo development, hatchability and post-hatch development. Poult. Sci. 84:914920.
Mauldin, J. M., and R. J. Buhr. 1995. What is really happening in your incubator? Int. Hatchery Pract. 9:1922.
Meijerhof, R. 2002. Design and operation of commercial incubators. Pages 4146 in Practical Aspects of Commercial
Incubation. D. C. Deeming, ed. Ratite Conference Books,
Lincolnshire, UK.
Meijerhof, R., and S. Lourens. 1999. Embryo temperature
is the key factor in incubation. World Poultry-Elsevier
15:4243.
Meijerhof, R., and G. van Beek. 1993. Mathematical modeling of temperature and moisture loss of hatching eggs. J.
Theor. Biol. 165:2741.
Ogunshile, G., and N. Sparks. 1995. Effect of broiler egg
weight on hatchability. Br. Poult. Sci. 36:861862.
Owen, J. 1991. Principles and problems of incubator design.
Pages 205224 in Avian Incubation. S. G. Tullett, ed. Butterworth Heinemann, London, UK.
REFERENCES
1918
Peebles, E. D., and J. Brake. 1987. Eggshell quality and hatchability in broiler breeder eggs. Poult. Sci. 66:596604.
Ross Breeders. 1998. Ross 308 Parent Stock Management
Manual. Ross Breeders Limited, Newbridge, Midlothian,
Scotland, UK.
SAS Institute Inc. 1990. SAS Users Guide: Statistics. Version 6 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.