0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
2K vues1 page
GTZ implemented a health program in the Philippines on behalf of Germany. Some GTZ employees resigned due to a dispute and filed an illegal dismissal case. GTZ claimed immunity from suit as an agency of Germany. However, the court ruled against GTZ because they did not provide evidence of their immunity from suit, such as certification from the Department of Foreign Affairs. The court held that while states can waive immunity, GTZ failed to prove they had done so in this case.
GTZ implemented a health program in the Philippines on behalf of Germany. Some GTZ employees resigned due to a dispute and filed an illegal dismissal case. GTZ claimed immunity from suit as an agency of Germany. However, the court ruled against GTZ because they did not provide evidence of their immunity from suit, such as certification from the Department of Foreign Affairs. The court held that while states can waive immunity, GTZ failed to prove they had done so in this case.
GTZ implemented a health program in the Philippines on behalf of Germany. Some GTZ employees resigned due to a dispute and filed an illegal dismissal case. GTZ claimed immunity from suit as an agency of Germany. However, the court ruled against GTZ because they did not provide evidence of their immunity from suit, such as certification from the Department of Foreign Affairs. The court held that while states can waive immunity, GTZ failed to prove they had done so in this case.
DEUTSCHE GESELLSCHAFT TECHNISCHE ZUSAMMENARBEIT (GTZ) v. HON.
COURT OF APPEALS G.R. No. 152318, April 16, 2009 FACTS The Federal Republic of Germany and the Republic of the Philippines ratified and agreement which lead to the Social Health InsuranceNetworking and Empowerment (SHINE) program wherein the program seeks to provide health care to Filipino families, especially the poor. The Republic of Germany assigned the GTZ as the implementing corporation for the program, while the Philippines designated the Department of Health and the Philippine Health Insurance Corporation. Private respondents, as employed by GTZ for the implementation of the SHINE, had a misunderstanding with the Project Manager of SHINE. This lead to an exchange of letters which was interpreted to be the resignation of the private respondents. Private respondents then filed a complaint for illegal dismissal to the labor arbiter. GTZ contends that it is immune from suit as it is the accredited agency of the Federal Republic of Germany. ISSUE Whether or not the GTZ is immune from suit. HELD A state may waive its immunity through a general or specific law. The special law can take the form of the original charter of the incorporated government agency. In this case however, GTZ presented any evidence to support their claim that they are immune from suit, and has failed to obtain a certification of immunity from suit from the Department of Foreign Affairs. If GTZ has done so, then there would be no ambiguity in their claim that they are immune from suit.