Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
ple attenuation and developments that we might anticipate in the near future.
The basic model in seismic processing assumes that
reflection data consist of primaries only. If multiples are
not removed, they can be misinterpreted as, or interfere
with, primaries. This is a longstanding and only partially
solved problem in exploration seismology. Many methods
exist to remove multiples, and they are useful when their
assumptions and prerequisites are satisfied. However,
there are also many instances when these assumptions are
violated or where the prerequisites are difficult or impossible to attain; hence, multiples remain a problem. This
motivates the search for new demultiple concepts, algorithms, and acquisition techniques to add to, and enhance,
our toolbox of methods.
Furthermore, interest in multiple attenuation has been
rejuvenated due to the industry trend toward more complex, costly, and challenging exploration plays. These
include deepwater with a dipping ocean-bottom and targets that are subsalt and sub-basalt. These circumstances
can cause traditional methods to bump up hard against
their assumptions. The heightened economic risk and complexity of these E&P objectives raise both the technology
bar and the associated stakes for methods that can accommodate less a priori information and fewer restrictions
and unrealistic assumptions.
Methods that can reach that level of effectiveness often
place extra demands on processing costs, and on a more
complete sampling and rigorous definition of the seismic
experiment (e.g., the need for the source signature in water).
However, that trade-off and added expense can be a real
bargain if they enable the identification and removal of
heretofore inaccessible multiples while preserving primaries. Indeed, being able to distinguish, for example, a
gas sand from a multiple under a broader set of complex
circumstances makes the extra cost of processing pale compared with reducing the risk and improving the reliability of drill or no-drill decisions.
Two basic approaches to multiple attenuation. Methods
that attenuate multiples can be classified as belonging to
two broad categories: (1) those that seek to exploit a feature or property that differentiates primary from multiple
and (2) those that predict and then subtract multiples from
seismic data. The former are typically filtering methods,
and the latter are generally based on the prediction from
either modeling or inversion of the recorded seismic wavefield. This classification is not rigid; methods will often have
aspects associated with each category.
There are some who have proposed an alternate point
of view: Primaries and multiples are considered as signal
to be imaged or otherwise utilized. We anticipate further
developments of this more inclusive approach. The current dominant viewpoint is the exclusive one, where primaries are signal and multiples are noise.
There is tremendous value in the latter approach, since
depth and time, and separating reflection from propagation are relatively simple for the model of signal as pri-
40
JANUARY 1999
Algorithm
predictive decon
Radon transform + predictive decon
stacking
eigenimages + reject filter
2-D FT + reject filter
Radon transform + reject filter
3-D FT + reject filter
JANUARY 1999
Feature
periodicity
periodicity
separability
separability
separability
separability
separability
THE LEADING EDGE
Downloaded 10 Sep 2011 to 99.10.237.97. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://segdl.org/
0000
0000
JANUARY 1999
JANUARY 1999
Downloaded 10 Sep 2011 to 99.10.237.97. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://segdl.org/
41
JANUARY 1999
completely different (1) cataloging of multiples; (2) algorithms for their attenuation; and (3) requirements for a priori or a posteriori information.
The feedback method, with its associated interface
model for internal multiples, proceeds from one reflector
down to the next and removes all internal multiples that
have their shallowest downward reflection at that reflector. To realize that program, within the feedback method,
requires at least an implicit estimate of the velocity model
of the downward continuation operators and updating of
those operators. The latter updating typically depends on
the flatness criteria for image gathers. Although we recognize that this is a commonly used criteria, it is nevertheless a significant assumption to consider it a necessary and
sufficient condition for a correct downward continuation,
especially under complex circumstances.
An alternate realization of the feedback program for
internal multiples appears to avoid certain aspects of the a
priori information by substituting the infusion of a posteriori information, through the judgment of an interpreter
who decides at each interface what is primary and what is
multiple. The feedback method of internal multiple removal
would seem to be particularly effective and most appropriate
when the internal-multiple-generating reflectors are shallow and smooth and when the macromodel needed to reach
them from the measurement surface is not very complex.
The inverse-scattering method for attenuating internal
multiples derives from the multiple prediction and subtraction subseries that reside within the only multidimensional direct inversion methodology: the inverse scattering
series.
The removal of multiples is viewed as one of the steps,
stages, or tasks that a direct inversion method would have
to perform prior to imaging and inverting primaries for relative changes in earth mechanical properties. The inversescattering series performs direct inversion; hence, the
inverse-scattering series must contain a part of itself, i.e., a
subseries, that is devoted to the task of removing multiples.
If the overall series starts with no a priori information, then
each task is carried out without a priori information. The
distinct subseries that attenuate free-surface and internal
multiples have been identified. Each term in the internal
multiple-attenuating series provides a mechanism for predicting and attenuating all multiples that have experienced
a certain number of reflections, independent of the location
of those reflectors. Absolutely no a priori or a posteriori information is required about the subsurface velocity or structure below the hydrophones. No iteration or interpretive
intervention is ever needed. The method doesnt depend
on periodicity or moveout differences or stripping. The
inverse-scattering method is the only multidimensional
method for attenuating all multiples that doesnt require any
form of a priori or a posteriori information. We would expect
that the inverse-scattering series for attenuating internal
multiples would be particularly well suited and appropriate when the reflectors that generate the internal multiples
are either not shallow, or not simple, or not smooth, or when
a complex macromodel would be needed to carry out the
downward continuation to a reflector.
A strength of the feedback method is that, when it can
carry out its program to a given reflector, the cost per reflector is roughly twice the cost of the free-surface algorithm.
The cost of the inverse-scattering series approach to internal multiple attenuation is considerably greater.
Early tests indicate that the incremental costs of performing inverse-scattering internal multiple attenuation are
about an order of magnitude (10 times) over performing
JANUARY 1999
Downloaded 10 Sep 2011 to 99.10.237.97. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://segdl.org/
0000
INVERSION
INVERSION
Wavefield
extrapolation
Feedback
Inverse-scattering
Series
Types of
multiples
Water-bottom,
peg-leg and
first-layer
reverberations
Fundamental
physical
unit
Water-layer
and
ocean-bottom
Free-surface
+
Interface (reflector)
Free-surface
+
Point scatterer
Additional
information needed
free-surface multiples alone. This factors into the overhead costs of data preprocessing and quality control that
are required for free-surface multiple attenuation. The ratio
is significantly larger if you just compare the compute
cycle time of the inverse scattering internal multiple algorithm to the free-surface case. However, it is important to
note that the inverse scattering procedure accommodates
all reflectors at once.
It certainly appears that from both a cost/benefit and
domain of applicability that the feedback (interface) model
and inverse-scattering (point-scatterer) model could evolve
into complementary approaches to the important problem
of internal multiple attenuation. In any given case, you
might choose one or the other or a combination of the two.
Early field tests of the inverse-scattering and interface
methods for internal multiples are encouraging. Table 2
summarizes the prediction and subtraction methods.
Conclusions. Multiple attenuation methods continue to
develop, evolve and mature, driven by the confluence of
heightened technical challenge and increased economic risk.
Whereas filter-methods are continuously moving toward
greater effectiveness, the wavefield prediction and subtraction techniques are the current point men in the assault on
the most resistant and troublesome multiples. The latter
allow for the most complex subsurfaces but require clarity
and completeness in the seismic experiment. Although they
are in general more demanding, their demands are in a realm
where we are able, in principle, to satisfy them. They are a
reasonable trade for earlier demands or assumptions about
the subsurface that are intrinsically beyond our reach or
0000
JANUARY 1999
JANUARY 1999
Downloaded 10 Sep 2011 to 99.10.237.97. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://segdl.org/
43
JANUARY 1999
Downloaded 10 Sep 2011 to 99.10.237.97. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://segdl.org/
0000