1

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION
BRANCH 33
MANILA CITY
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Petitioner,

For: SERIOUS PHYSICAL

INJURIES

-versus-

PRINCESS BUBBLEGUM,
Respondent,
X==========================X

COUNTER AFFIDAVIT
I, PRINCESS BUBBLEGUM, of legal age, single, and a resident of
No. 30 Luz Circle St. Corinthian Gardens, Quezon City, after being duly
sworn in accordance with law, hereby depose and state that:
1. I am one of the persons charged with SERIOUS PHYSICAL
INJURIES pending before the Trial Court, Branch 33, Quezon
City;
2. On March 2, 2015 at around 4 oclock in the afternoon, I saw
DOOR LORD in the Eastwood Mall. Also, I aver that our, my
co-respondents and I, things were kept inside our bags and
not seen by the public as we entered the cinema house.
3. About half an hour, I saw Door Lord when he was running out
the cinema with an object that looks like the t-shirt in my
bag;
4. I did not witness a child accidentally poured soup on Door
Lord;
5. When I checked my bag, it was open. The same goes with the
bags of my co-respondents;
6. When we learned about this, we immediately followed Door
Lord because we wanted to get our personal property back;

7. We saw Door Lord entering a restroom for the disabled. So we

went to the restroom but it was locked.
8. We tried to open the door using force and attempted to regain
our private property
9. When we opened the door, we saw Door Lord holding our
stuff.
10.
We used force to get back or regain back our private
property.
11.
I deny the allegation of a case of serious physical injuries
because according to RA 386, Article 429 The owner or lawful
possessor of a thing has the right to exclude any person from
the enjoyment and disposal thereof. For this purpose, he may
use such force as may be reasonably necessary to repel or
prevent an actual or threatened unlawful physical invasion or
usurpation of his property. (n) (Vl II, p54, citing 3-1
Ennecerrus, Kipp & Wolff 92-93): If the property is immovable,
there should be no delay in the use of force to recover it; a
delay, even if excusable, such as when is due to the ignorance
of the dispossession, will bar the right to the use of force
verifying that our actions in order to get back our personal
possessions was not unlawful and that we had every right to
use force under these circumstances.
12.
This Counter Affidavit is being executed to attest to the
truth of all the foregoing facts and events and to disclaim all
the accusations against me.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature on
th
this 16
day of March 2015 at Manila City to Quezon City.

PRINCESS BUBBLEGUM (sgd.)

Affiant

SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 16

2015 at Manila City to Quezon City.

th

day of March,

I hereby CERTIFY that I have personally examined the affiant and

that I am satisfied that he has voluntarily executed and understood his
CounterAffidavit.

AGUSTIN M. AVALON (sgd.)

Asst. Prov. Prosecutor