Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
DESCRIPTIONS
44.1.1
Mission
HYDROSTATIC
WIG
AERODYNAMIC
SURFACE EFFECT SHIP
QUADRAMARAN
PLANING CRAFT
HYDROFOIL
POWERED AEROSTATIC
HYDRODYNAMIC
Water
Air
Static
Dynamic
Hydrostatic
Aerostatic
Hydrodynamic
Aerodynamic
SWATH:
Hydrofoil:
SPECIFIC
ATTRIBUTES
AND
ISSUES
The following sections present a qualitative
discussion of the principal strengths and weaknesses
of each concept. The text provides an examination of
each type of platform and identifies the most suitable
types prior to examining vessels available on the
market. Only those aspects which are particularly
important to a given concept are discussed. Attributes
or issues that are not mentioned can be assumed to be
minor for the platform or comparable to others.
44.2.1
>
0.9
F
v
or
1/ 3
Volumetric
Froude
Number
Monohulls
ROUND BILGE
gL
HARD CHINE
DOUBLE CHINE
Guizzo
(Aquastrada)
101.8
14.5
2.12
9.5
27.93
1034
41
450
126
Albayzin
(Mestral)
96.2
14.6
2.1
8.9
21.6
946
35
450
84
44-3
NVG Asco
(Corsaire)
102
15.4
2.4
5.2
24
1100
37
500
148 (4 + 108)
MDV 1200
Pegasus
100
17.1
2.75
10.7
27.5
1200 est.
38
800
175 (6 + 106)
Multi-Hulls
44-4
ROUND BILGE
HARD CHINE
WAVE-PIERCER
Hai Chang
(Austal)
40
11.5
1.4
N/A
4
N/A
32
338
None
Juan Patrico
(INCAT K55)
70.4
19.5
2.15
5.65
21.24
383 est.
45
294
53
Westmaran
4200S
42.23
10
1.6
N/A
4
N/A
35
230
None
44-5
Delphin
(Auto Express 82 m
82.3
23
2.5
6.5
24.0
1100 est.
37.5
600
175 (10 + 50)
Characteristics
Length, m
Beam, m
Draft, m
Hull Depth, m
Power, mW
Displacement, t
Speed, kts
Passengers
Cars (Buses + Cars)
Condor 11
(INCAT 78 m)
77.5
26
3.4
7.2
17.28
785
35
600
150 (6 + 90)
Hayabusa
(AMD 1500)
99.78
20
3.10
12.6
18.96
2200
30
460
94 (24)
Surf Express
(Gold Coast)
31.7
9.8
1.35
N/A
2.6
61.1
35
128
--
Low-Wash (NQEA)
35
10.5
1.35
0.746
24
200
None
44.2.2.4 Trimarans
TABLE 44.VI - TRIMARAN PASSENGER VESSELS
Characteristics
Length, m
Beam, m
Draft, m
Power, MW
Displacement, t
Speed, kts
Passengers
Cars (Buses + Cars)
Ilan Voyager
21.3
10
1.1
0.18
4.5
24
12
None
Lay Consultants,
Thames River Ferry
17.5
5.5
0.8
0.35
15
20
60
None
FWD
SWATH
AFT
SEMI-SWATH
HYSWAS
Characteristics
Length, m
Beam, m
Draft, m
Power, MW
Displacement, t
Speed, kts
Passengers
Cars (Buses + Cars)
SSC 40
44
16
3.5
8
N/A
30.6
410
None
Navatek 1
44
16
2.5
2
N/A
18
440
None
Cloud X
37
18
3.4
5.7
340
30
365
None
Specific Attributes The principal attribute of a semiSWATH vessel is its seakeeping combined with a
relatively low resistance even to fairly high
speeds (40+ knots).
The catamaran-like aft sections are more
suitable for machinery arrangement and especially for
integrating waterjet propulsion.
Like a SWATH, semi-SWATH vessels offer a
great deal of arrangeable deck space.
Specific Issues Although not quite as sensitive as
SWATH vessels, semi-SWATH vessels are
somewhat sensitive to overloading and trim. The
small waterplane of the forward section makes it
more sensitive, in particular, to forward trim.
However, this concept is fairly new and more
operational experience is needed to assess its
future.
44.2.4
Hydrofoil Craft
Seajet 250
76
23
3.4
8.05
30
890 est.
DOUBLE CHINE 44
450
120
44-11
SURFACE PIERCING
FULLY SUBMERGED
HYDROFOIL CATAMARAN
Foilcat
35
12
4.7 (2.55)
4.2
8.95
150 est.
45
403
State-of-the-Art
HYSWAS
Description
The
Hydrofoil Small Waterplane Area Ship
(HYSWAS) concept is a hybrid between the SWATH
and Hydrofoil concepts. A single hull with a small
waterplane area and a large underwater body is fitted
with a fully-submerged foil system to provide partial
lift as well as active control (especially in roll).
This concept is intended to improve speed/powering
characteristics compared to conventional SWATH
44-13
TSL-F Prototype
17.1
6.2
3.1/1.6
Unknown
2.8
38
41
Sea Quest
8.2
3.7
3.0/?
4.0
0.6
12
35
Specific Attributes
HYSWAS offers a good combination of high-speed
and excellent seakeeping.
The foils act to unwet the underside of the platform
and a significant part of the strut linking the platform
to the underwater body. They also provide the means
of actively controlling the vessels motions, especially
in roll.
Small wake when foilborne.
Specific Issues
HYSWAS machinery installation poses the same
challenges as with SWATH vessels; the narrow struts
make the installation and access to the machinery
difficult.
Craft stability at speed is entirely dependent upon the
control of the foils, as for hydrofoil craft having fullysubmerged foils. Control at low speed is more of a
challenge.
Foilborne speeds are relatively high, thus extrapolation
to large vessels would require targeting very high
speeds (60+ kts) and large propulsion plants.
The vessels have relatively deep draft, while off foils.
Hovercraft
a)
Description
State-of-the-Art Examples
Air Cushion Vehicles are essentially hovercraft with
rectangular platforms supported by a cushion of
pressurized air, the escape of which is impeded by
flexible skirts attached around the whole periphery of
the platform, as illustrated in Figure 44-15. The
pressurized air, which supports 100% of the weight of
44-14
Specific Issues
Description
Specific Attributes
The concept has low frictional resistance due to the
air cushion, as for conventional ACVs although this
is tempered by the presence of the skegs. Compared
to an ACV, the ACVAS benefits from its foot in the
water as it can be fitted with marine propellers or
waterjets for propulsion, with a far greater
propulsive efficiency than air propellers and
reduced noise as a result.
Sumidagawa
Length, m
20.0
Beam, m
7.9
Draft, m
0.5
Hull Depth, m
3.7
Power, mW
0.8
Speed, kts
30
Passenger
80
Another benefit of the access to the water is the use
of water-cooled engines instead of air-cooled
engines for propulsion power.
Specific Concerns
The ACVAS looses the amphibious capability of the
pure ACV although it can still operate in shallow
water, particularly, if waterjets are used.
The concept is still at a developmental stage, but
shows great promise.
Other comments applicable to ACVs also apply
here.
44-16
Description
Table 44.13 - SES Vessels
A Surface Effect Ship (SES) is a hovercraft that
combines the twin rigid sidehulls of a catamaran with
the flexible seals of an ACV fore and aft to contain,
beneath the platform, a cushion of pressurized air.
This cushion supports typically 80% or more of the
weight of the craft and results in a significant reduction
in resistance at high speeds. A sketch of the concept is
shown in Figure 44-18.
State-of-the-Art Examples
The first SESs appeared some 35 years ago and a fairly
large number of SES passenger ferries are now in
operation around the world.
The principal
characteristics of three of these are shown in Table 4413.
The largest SES built to-date is a 70-m prototype built
by Mitsubishi and Mitsui for the Techno-Superliner
program, shown in Figure 44-19.
Plans for large cargo/container vessels up to 5000 tons
of deadweight are also being considered.
Specific Attributes
44-17
Characteristics
UT928
HM 527
TSLA-70
Length, m
38
27
70
Beam, m
12
10
19
Draft, m
2.6/1.0
2.6/1.7
3.5/1.1
Power, mW
5.1
2.7
30
Displacement, t
150
87
Unknown
Speed, kts
48
36
54
Passengers
350
200
None*
* Prototype, designed to carry 200 t deadweight.
Like the ACVAS, the contact with the water allows the
use of marine propellers or waterjets as well as water
cooled engines.
The sidehulls also provide the SES with lateral
stability.
This allows higher length-to-beam
configurations than ACVs which result in a greater
flexibility for operating efficiently at medium speeds
(lower hump drag).
SES are, therefore, suitable for a wide range of speeds,
but particular so for high speeds (>40 kts).
44.2.6
a)
Specific Attributes
WIGs
Description
WIGS are generally a mix between a seaplane hull and
low aspect ratio wings which have been shown to
obtain efficient speeds up to 400 kts within ground
effect. When in the cruise mode, no part of the vessel
is in contact with the water as illustrated in Figure 4420. Although the beneficial effects of ground effect on
the lift-to-drag ratio of aircraft have been observed
since the Wright Brothers, WIG specific research and
development has only really occurred within the last
30 years. Most of this research was done in Russia
and has only recently been released.
State-of-the-Art Examples
Following the opening of the iron curtain, a flood of
information about Russian ekranoplans hit the western
world. This information has shown that it is physically
possible to build and operate a large WIG such as the
Caspian Sea Monster. One of the more notable
achievements in the use of ground effect was the 1929
flight of the German DoX Flying Boat across the
Atlantic within ground effect. Some commercial
44-19
b)
Description
Operating Ram wing or Channel Flow wing craft are
not truly aerodynamic craft, but are supported by a
combination of hydrostatic, hydrodynamic and
aerodynamic forces. These craft also tend to by multihulled vessels using the cross deck structure as the
wing and the hulls to cap the wings. A ram wing
operates by creating dynamic overpressure on the
bottom side of the wing to increase the lift-to-drag
ratio when at operational speed. The channel flow
wing operates similar to a WIG in that the trailing end
of the wing is open.
State-of-the-Art Examples
44-20
XTW-2
18.5
12.72
0.448
3.6
100
14
Wild Thing
30
11
Unknown
1.2
2.25
80
45
149
44-21
Quadrimaran
25
10.4
0.4
Unknown
1.25
216
40+
150