Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
P. Groche1 (2), D. Fritsche1, E. A. Tekkaya2 (2), J. M. Allwood3 (2), G. Hirt4, R. Neugebauer5 (1)
Institute for Production Engineering and Forming Machines, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
2
Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Atilim University, Ankara, Turkey
3
Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
4
Metal Forming Institute, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
5
Fraunhofer Institute for Machine Tools and Forming Technology, Chemnitz, Germany
Abstract
Incremental bulk forming is the oldest known technique in metal working. Many developments in this field
have dramatically changed our society. Today incremental bulk forming processes are applied to quality
products in small and large series production. Numerous advances have been realized. The motivation for
using these processes is presented here. After a general definition of incremental processes and a
classification of incremental bulk forming in particular, some innovative product and process examples are
given that show the potential. Finally recent progress and challenges are illustrated in detail. This includes the
development of new machinery for incremental bulk forming, advanced methods for process planning,
occurrence of failure modes and the properties of finished products.
Keywords:
Forming, Metal, Incremental
-635-
doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.006
(b)
(a)
(c)
Figure 3: (a) Ancient hammer and anvil, (b) medieval
blacksmith, (c) steam hammer from the time of the
industrial revolution, sources: Gallery of Early
Blacksmithing, North Carolina Archive.
-636-
th
(a)
(d)
(b)
(e)
(f)
(c)
Figure 6: (a) Copper axes from Neolithic Age, (b) Iron Age
tools, (c) Renaissance armor, (d) segment of Ariane
booster, (e) hollow shaft, (f) clutch carrier and internal
gear, sources: Carnet/MDC, Markham Museum, Hermann
Historica, Aerospace technology, PtU Darm-stadt, Leico.
(b)
(a)
(c)
(d)
Figure 7: Weights of iron blooms excavated in Europe
plotted against time [6].
-637-
Technological
High flexibility
Net-shape-products
Low investment
Low productivity
-638-
Thomsen et
al. [17]
Blazynski
[18]
Kudo [19]
Lange [20]
Process mechanics
Deformation is generally not steady-state in incremental
processes, and the forming zone is usually embedded
within elastic zones. Typically gradients of stress are
higher than in conventional processes.
Generally
incremental processes experience continuous contact
change between tool and workpiece through a long
process cycle, so process modelling is arduous.
Process operation
Incremental processes have slower cycle times than diedefined processes but generally have much faster setup
times as they do not require manufacture of dedicated
tooling. Control of incremental processes may combine
an open-loop tool path planning algorithm with closed
loop feedback control. An attraction of such feedback is
that, for the first time in automated production, corrective
forming can be achieved. However, feedback control
depends on the availability of suitably fast sensors and
process models for predictive control. Only few
processes can be modelled with sufficient speed to allow
this. Combined control of temperature and deformation
suggests future possibilities in controlling product
microstructure as well as geometry.
The area of incremental bulk forming is expanding rapidly
with new process designs, and the common features
above indicate a shared set of challenges for process
development. Many of these challenges relate to the
difficulty of predicting the effect of the next tool move on
the workpiece. The processes currently in commercial
use or near to implementation are generally those which
are most predictable.
Allwood and
Utsunomiya
[21]
2.2 Classification
The problem of classifying metal forming processes has
attracted several efforts in the past 50 years, but has yet
to lead to a convincing solution due to the number of
parameters that may be used. Table 2 provides a
compact survey of the key parameters used in five
classification schemes proposed by Thomsen et al. [18],
Blazynski [19], Kudo [20], Lange [21], and Allwood and
Utsunomiya [21]. The widely used German DIN scheme
[23] is mainly based on the stress state in the workpiece.
-639-
INNOVATIVE
PRODUCT
AND
PROCESS
EXAMPLES
Some of the processes listed in table 3 are relatively
mature as was shown in section 1, but the interest of this
paper is in exploring the rapid growth in incremental bulk
forming processes from innovative concept through to
commercialisation. This section provides examples of
various contrasting innovative processes at different
stages of the journey to commercialisation.
3.1 Orbital forming
Orbital forming is an example of an incremental process
with a continuous deformation sequence and mainly
uniaxial compressive stresses. This is a mature
technology, related to ring rolling and the processes of
tube nosing and flaring. Figure 8 illustrates a schematic
of the process and several products, included flanged
automotive parts.
x Rings
Using this simple parameterisation of processes, table 3
presents a classification of all known incremental bulk
forming processes. A selection of exemplar processes in
table 3 will be discussed in more detail in section 3.
Uniaxial
compression
Uniaxial
compression +
Uniaxial
tension
B
L
R
B
L
R
Stress system
B
Biaxial
compression
Deformation sequence
Intermittent
Continuous
Orbital forging,
B
Grob process
In-plane strip
L
bending
R Ring rolling
unlikely
B
unlikely
L Helical rolling
unlikely
Rotary
swaging
Incremental
forging, Rotary
swaging, Flow
forming, Cross
rolling
R
Biaxial
compression +
Uniaxial
tension
Triaxial
compression
R
B
Thread rolling,
Roto-Flo
process [24]
Figure 8: Orbital forming, source: Timken.
Incremental
ring rolling,
R
Flexible wheel
rolling
B
unlikely
L
B
L
unlikely
unlikely
Localised
hammering
L
R
unlikely
unlikely
Roller
burnishing
L
R Gear rolling
-640-
-641-
4.1 Machines
Incremental processes typically use relatively small and
simple tools, which experience reduced forces compared
to their non-incremental equivalents, so machines can be
lighter for equivalent stiffness. However, incremental
processes must generally allow more degrees of freedom
in moving the tool, so they are more complex and require
a control that is more complex. Regarding the different
press types, there are typical characteristics of each
actuation (Table 4). Mechanical presses have the
advantage of a high yield rate in relation to hydraulic
presses. Mechanical presses are classified in presses
with crank mechanism and cam mechanism, where
presses with crank mechanism are used for higher
process forces and presses with cam mechanism for
processes with complex path time behaviour and high
stroke rates. Regarding a flexibly adjustable path time
and force time behaviour, mechanical presses possess
substantial disadvantages. The processes are rigidly
coupled to the kinematics of the drive components. High
forces may call for hydraulic drive systems that are
applicable in particular for slow movements for example
the adjustment of pressure rolls as shown in Figure 12.
In order to realise press ram movements optimally coordinated for different forming operations a number of
modified drives on mechanical base were developed. In
order to uncouple the press ram movement completely
from mechanics and to achieve the highest possible
flexibility, there are efforts to implement the press ram
-642-
Characteristics
mechanical
press
[59]
hydraulic
press
[5960]
servo motor
press
[61][64]
-643-
Processes analysed
References
Dynamic
Explicit
Ring-rolling and
pilgering
[67 - 74]
Arbitrary
LagrangianEulerian (ALE)
Ring-rolling
[76 - 81]
Hybrid Mesh
[82 - 89]
Multigrid
Methods
Ring-rolling and
incremental forging
[90]
SuperElements
Orbital forging
[91]
SelfSimilarity
[92, 93]
Figure 14: Hybrid mesh approach: (a) Actually Rotating
Mesh System, (b) Spatially Fixed Mesh System [85].
Figure 15: Comparison of hybrid method with conventional method as applied to multi-pass forging [88].
In [86 - 89] a hybrid mesh method has been applied to
ring-rolling and multi-pass forging (Figure 15). Here the
AMS is named the geometry mesh and the SMS the
-644-
Specific Process
References
Pseudo PlaneStrain
Ring-rolling
[94 - 100]
Steady State
Partial Models
Ring-Rolling
[101 - 104]
Transient Partial
Models
Ring-Rolling
[105, 106]
Automatic
Expansion of
Domain Method
Radial Forging
[107]
Linearization
Method
Orbital Forging
[108]
-645-
ring
mandrel
Ring
Segment
RigidSurfaces
ElasticRegion
ElasticRegion
Current challenges
Modelling of incremental bulk forming processes is still
exposed to several challenges. One basic challenge is
the appropriate modelling of the material constitutive
behaviour. In many incremental forming processes a
material element is exposed on one hand to cyclic loading
and unloading states and on the other hand, the strain
paths are changing from one cycle to another one. This is
the most ambitious type of material behaviour and
represents a real challenge for the accurate modelling of
incremental forming processes. The effect of strain path
dependency has been investigated by Sillekens et al.
[109, 110].
In their studies the effect of tensioncompression and torsion-tension loading sequences have
been analysed. Significant effects on the flow stresses
(changes of about 20%) have been found. In these
studies only a single cycle has been considered. Similar
results are reported by Wanheim et al. [111]. Other
studies are reviewed in Bariani et al. [112]. The effect of
cyclic loading combined with a change of strain path has
been covered in a recent study of Meyer et al. [113].
Figure 23 shows for instance the effect of cyclic torsion of
42CrMo4 for large forward shear strain amplitudes and
different portions of back deformations. With increasing
back deformation the stress-strain curve deviates
significantly from the monotonic curve.
The accurate prediction of product properties is another
challenge for modelling incremental bulk forming
processes. The basic issue here is the fact that numerical
models include various simplifications to increase their
computational efficiency. Hence, rigid-plastic models
neglect elastic deformations and are therefore not able to
-646-
Workpiece failure
Fracture
Underfilling
Buckling
Wrinkling/Buckling
Surface disruption
Wear
Crack formation
Scale formation
-647-
(b)
(c)
(a)
(b)
(a)
(b)
(c)
Figure 29: (a) Shingling on a rolled anchor, (b) surface
disruption of a radial axial formed part, (c) destroyed
surface of toothings produced by incremental forging,
sources: Hilti, PtU Darmstadt.
-648-
(a)
(b)
(c)
(b)
(c)
(d)
-649-
(a)
(b)
(d)
(c)
-650-
-651-
-652-
[35]
[36]
[37]
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
[52]
-653-
-654-
-655-
-656-