Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Boston College
514
515
516
(Chase-Lansdale et al., 2003; Kalil, Dunifon,
& Danziger, 2001; Osborne & Knab, 2007).
Because of these mixed results, we argue that it
is essential to explore the role of different aspects
of low-income mothers work experiences, such
as work intensity, stability, and quality.
Employment intensity. Existing research on
different aspects of mothers work experiences
focuses on the intensity of employment, quality
of employment, and stability of employment.
Intensity of employment may be defined as
hours worked per week or months worked per
year, indicating the consistency and amount of
work. There is limited research on the intensity
of employment among low-income mothers of
young children. Two recent longitudinal studies
of low-income families found no significant
associations between mothers work hours
and months and the behavioral or cognitive
functioning of children during early or middle
childhood (Chase-Lansdale et al., 2003; Kalil
et al., 2001). Few studies have assessed the
intensity of mothers employment over time and
potential repercussions for children and families.
Two possible explanations for the lack of
association between employment intensity and
child functioning are that low-income womens
employment may be of variable quality or that
work intensity may be related to child well-being
in a curvilinear fashion, with low work hours
providing limited monetary and psychological
benefits, and extremely high work hours sapping
womens time and energy for quality parenting.
Employment quality. Limited research has gone
beyond assessing mothers employment status
and extent to consider the quality of employment. The Womens Employment Study (WES),
which followed a sample of welfare recipients
as they transitioned into the labor market, found
that womens average employment rates and
wages increased in the late 1990s, yet many
women remained unemployed, underemployed,
or working in poor-quality jobs (defined by
wages, health benefits, and hours of the job;
Johnson & Corcoran, 2003). Some research has
suggested that the benefits of maternal employment are translated through the occupational
complexity of jobs, with high-complexity jobs
being most promotive of childrens development and simple and repetitive jobs having
negative implications for children in comparison to nonemployment (Parcel & Menaghan,
Family Relations
1994). The importance of job earnings for
childrens functioning has been examined in
experimental antipoverty employment. A number of programs successfully increased mothers
employment and income but found no significant
benefits for young childrens functioning (Morris & Michalopoulous, 2003), although older
children exhibited enhanced achievement and
social behaviors (Morris & Gennetian, 2003).
It is notable that little research has more carefully assessed employment quality factors such
as wages or benefits like health insurance.
Stability of employment. A final important
work characteristic is stability, which has been
examined by looking at either cycling between
welfare and work or cycling between jobs.
Cycling has been found to be common in
low-income samples; nearly half of the women
in the WES experienced job instability (Johnson
& Corcoran, 2003). Job cycling also has been
linked with negative emotional and behavioral
functioning among young children (Dunifon
et al., 2003; Yoshikawa & Seidman, 2001),
suggesting that unstable employment may pose
risks to children compared with continuous
employment or unemployment.
Research Goals and Hypotheses
Taken together, these studies suggest that maternal employment in low-income families could be
positively, neutrally, or negatively linked with
childrens outcomes depending on the characteristics of employment. Little research has extensively assessed multiple aspects of mothers
employment in a comprehensive manner. Given
that characteristics of employment are likely
to covary, considering employment intensity,
quality, and consistency together will provide a
richer portrayal of womens employment experiences. In addition, the literature has primarily
focused on school-aged children, with less attention on early childhood, a critical developmental
period. In the current research, we used a representative sample of low-income families from
three cities to assess multiple aspects of mothers employment experiences over childrens
preschool years and to assess links with childrens later functioning (at age 9) in emotional,
behavioral, and cognitive realms. On the basis of
theory and prior literature, we hypothesized that
unemployment, low-quality employment, and
employment patterns characterized by cycling
517
age in months from 24 to 48 months, a time
span that maximized the data available for
children between 24 and 54 months of age
at Wave 1. The employment data were used
to create a series of analytic variables. Work
intensity was measured with a count of the
number of months worked over the 2-year period
and the number of hours per week employed
during periods of employment. Work quality
included a continuous measure of average hourly
wage rates during periods of employment and a
count of the number of months the mother had
received employer-provided health insurance.
Work stability was assessed by the number
of different jobs held as well as a count of
the number of transitions from employment
to unemployment or vice versa. In addition,
mothers reports on employment experiences
drawn from the Wave 3 interview were used
to create measures of current weekly pay in
dollars per hour, whether or not mothers were
receiving employer-provided health insurance,
and whether or not they had been employed the
majority of the past 11 months.
Childrens functioning. Measures of childrens
functioning were drawn from Waves 1 and
3. Mothers reported on childrens behavioral
and emotional functioning at each wave using
the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL/2-3 at
Wave 1 and CBCL/6-18 at Wave 3; Achenbach,
1992; Achenbach, Dumenci, & Rescorla, 2003).
At Wave 1, subscales for internalizing and
externalizing problems were created ( =
.81, .90). At Wave 3, DSM-based subscales
assessing childrens symptoms of affective
problems, anxiety problems, somatic problems, attention deficit hyperactivity (ADHD)
problems, oppositional defiant problems, and
conduct problems were created (s ranged
from .64 to .83). Childrens reading and
math skills were directly assessed using the
Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery Revised (WJ-R) Letter-Word Identification
and Applied Problems subtests at each wave
(Woodcock & Johnson, 1989, 1990; Woodcock
& Munoz-Sandoval, 1996). Standard scores
were created using the methods and norms
suggested by the instrument authors.
Child, mother, and family characteristics.
Numerous characteristics of children, mothers,
and families were assessed at Wave 1 (unless
otherwise noted). Mothers reported on child
518
Family Relations
519
Total Sample
(N = 539)
Low-Quality,
Low-Participation
Nonemployed
Employment (n = 246)
(n = 154)
Hours worked/week
22.96c (17.88)
No. transitions
1.32 (1.51)
No. jobs
1.08 (0.93)
Hourly wage
5.35 (4.55)
12.16a
31.38 (10.91)a
1.53 (1.00)a
1.33 (0.58)a
6.65 (2.24)a
0.50a
39.30 (8.99)
50.38%
49.62%
56.91%
42.03%
1%
27.14 (6.61)ac
91.86 (14.09)
33.29%b
16.13%
50.58%a
52.08%a
60.89%
37.18%b
23.33%b
2.91 (1.51)
0.58 (0.65)
34.11%
30.67%
35.22%
99.71 (13.16)
94.25 (16.46)
51.73 (10.09)
51.62 (10.11)
65.34%a
20.87 (17.93)a
6.76 (7.54)a
15.66%a
98.15 (16.03)
102.12 (18.78)
56.02 (6.65)a
55.56 (6.20)
55.38 (7.42)
54.73 (6.70)
56.69 (7.09)a
56.69 (8.27)b
Moderate-Quality, High-Quality,
Unstable
Stable
Employment
Employment
(n = 40)
(n = 89)
14.01b
33.38 (6.43)a
4.72 (1.07)ab
2.94 (0.50)ab
7.35 (2.70)b
1.63b
20.70ab
37.00 (7.15)
1.92 (1.54)a
1.59 (0.66)b
9.25 (2.48)ab
18.89ab
36.44 (8.03)
63.16%
36.84%
50.69%
45.48%
3.83%
37.95 (7.91)
63.32%
36.68%
37.21%
57.19%
5.60%
23.08 (3.80)bcd
91.87 (10.44)
29.24%
39.56%
31.2%c
79.63%a
65.81%
9.74%ab
1.56%ab
2.64 (1.13)
0.61 (0.68)
40.59%
30.23%
29.18%
29.47 (5.66)d
94.89 (20.67)
12.11%ab
21.24%
66.65%bc
71.14%
41.09%
24.79%
18.02%
2.37 (1.10)a
0.42 (0.52)
34.13%
33.62%
32.24%
100.19 (11.18)
91.37 (15.02)
58.94 (11.49)
58.55 (10.25)
102.39 (16.97)
92.70 (17.29)
51.18 (7.88)
50.07 (9.00)
60.55%b
59.42%c
31.11 (18.63)bd 19.12 (19.19)cd
6.28 (5.57)
7.47 (8.58)b
12.82%
35.44%b
99.94 (11.36)
104.49 (17.07)
99.83 (15.07)b 109.50 (17.19)ab
55.21 (6.55)
53.48 (4.37)a
56.33 (7.99)
55.04 (5.73)
55.07 (5.03)
54.21 (5.80)
59.33 (9.40)
55.55 (6.14)
56.34 (6.03)
53.49 (4.86)a
57.39 (7.11)c
53.40 (4.58)abc
Note: Significant differences (p < .05) between the cluster groups within each row are denoted with shared letters.
520
Family Relations
0.74 (1.13)a
1.21 (1.86)
1.49 (1.15)a
0.00 (0.05)
0.66 (0.81)
2.36 (0.80)
1.34 (3.31)
0.19 (0.05)
0.02 (0.07)
0.00 (0.03)
1.98 (1.32)
1.40 (0.97)
1.11 (0.97)
0.64 (1.11)
3.77 (2.28)
6.60 (2.36)
0.28 (0.31)
1.29 (0.52)
0.12 (0.14)
0.41 (1.04)
2.69 (0.93)
0.21 (0.25)
0.23 (1.33)
50.52 (4.85)
1.98
0.20
0.04 (0.19)
0.46 (0.23)
0.05 (0.09)
0.20 (0.07)
2.28 (3.30) 0.51 (3.81)
1.62 (3.20)
4.61 (2.50)+
4.35 (2.72)
2.45 (3.39)
1.66 (2.84)
2.76 (3.47)
0.02 (4.05) 0.98 (4.68)
6.78 (5.64)
6.57 (5.54)
0.32 (1.03) 1.41 (1.31)
0.42 (1.53)
1.74 (1.72)
0.25 (0.33)
0.33 (0.46)
9.38 (4.07) 1.41 (4.46)
1.35 (2.21)
3.07 (2.89)
0.48 (0.43) 0.47 (0.60)
1.89 (2.89)
3.09 (3.57)
71.30 (13.64) 79.30 (12.82)
4.72
3.34
0.27
0.20
Affective Problems
3.67 (3.34)
1.97 (4.35)
9.86 (3.59)
1.88 (2.67)a
1.31 (3.28)
4.58 (3.31)a
Math Skills
Hyperactivity
Problems
Somatic
Problems
Conduct
Problems
0.04 (0.09)
0.12 (0.11) 0.15 (0.08)+ 0.13 (0.08)
0.01 (0.02) 0.06 (0.03) 0.04 (0.03)
0.00 (0.02)
1.37 (1.33)
0.49 (1.38)
1.66 (1.47)
0.94 (1.21)
0.33 (1.14)
1.51 (1.34) 0.12 (1.07)
0.91 (1.01)
1.69 (1.00)+ 0.95 (1.15) 0.63 (1.18) 1.07 (0.97)
0.06 (1.17)
1.03 (1.21)
0.68 (1.04)
1.60 (1.12)
1.18 (1.74)
1.23 (1.53)
3.56 (2.10)+ 5.33 (1.79)
2.61 (1.78)
0.69 (1.74) 7.46 (2.21) 5.54 (1.96)
0.10 (0.34) 0.45 (0.39)
0.43 (0.36)
0.95 (0.37)
1.90 (0.54) 0.17 (0.56) 1.38 (0.56) 0.46 (0.53)
0.03 (0.12) 0.19 (0.14)
0.03 (0.12)
0.02 (0.13)
0.77 (1.25) 1.55 (1.62) 0.19 (1.23)
1.16 (1.20)
1.76 (1.03)+ 3.77 (1.16) 0.63 (1.03) 2.31 (0.95)
0.11 (0.18)
0.00 (0.17)
0.57 (0.26) 0.02 (0.18)
0.42 (0.99)
3.29 (1.51) 0.59 (1.17) 1.12 (1.14)
49.72 (4.98) 49.10 (1.14) 51.42 (4.27) 51.57 (3.50)
2.27
3.12
2.30
5.29
0.19
0.22
0.24
0.34
0.02 (0.09)
0.06 (0.03)
0.95 (1.67)
1.71 (1.28)
1.27 (1.15)
1.60 (1.10)
5.28 (1.89)
7.62 (1.96)
0.89 (0.39)
1.49 (0.70)
0.00 (0.14)
0.88 (1.26)
0.04 (1.21)
0.19 (0.21)
0.47 (1.31)
55.59 (4.01)
3.97
0.25
0.03 (0.06)
1.01 (0.98)
0.19 (1.09)
0.20 (3.15)
0.19 (0.05)
Oppositional
Problems
0.00 (0.05)
0.05 (0.05) 0.02 (0.05) 0.16 (0.05)
0.36 (0.82) 0.44 (0.91) 1.67 (0.91)+ 0.41 (0.79)
3.07 (0.85) 1.08 (0.99)
1.09 (0.95)
0.24 (0.86)
3.07 (2.10) 5.59 (2.16) 1.91 (2.16)
0.01 (2.33)
0.20 (0.05) 0.24 (0.05) 0.19 (0.05) 0.20 (0.04)
0.84 (1.15)
1.56 (2.12)
0.87 (1.28)
Anxiety
Problems
Note: Employed groups are compared to the omitted category of no employment. Within each column, groups sharing superscript letters are different from each other at the p < .05
level.
+
p < .10, p < .05, p < .01.
Reading Skills
Table 2. OLS Regression Models: Employment Quality Clusters Predicting Child Outcomes at W3 ( N = 539)
522
high-quality, stable maternal employment experiences in early childhood were associated with
higher cognitive skills and lower emotional and
behavioral problems for children 5 years later, at
age 9. Specifically, for cognitive skills, children
of mothers with high-quality, stable employment showed higher readings skills than children
of mothers with low-quality, low-participation
employment experiences, with a moderate effect
size of .40 standard deviations (SD). These children also had higher math skills than children of
unemployed mothers (.57 SD). Turning to the
measures of emotional and behavioral functioning, children of mothers with high-quality, stable
employment experiences showed fewer affective
problems (.38 SD), oppositional problems (.38
SD), and conduct problems (.28 SD) than children of mothers with low-quality employment
experiences as well as lower conduct problems
than children of unemployed mothers (.51 SD).
In contrast, low-quality and limited work among
mothers was linked to higher oppositional
problems among children than was consistent
unemployment (.35 SD). In addition, moderatequality unstable employment was associated
with greater somatic problems among children
than was consistent unemployment (.78 SD).
We ran two additional model specifications
to check the robustness of results. First, we
included two covariates denoting child-care type
at Wave 1 (center-based care or home-based
care) to determine if early child care influenced
the relationship between employment experiences and later child outcomes. Second, we
controlled for time-varying covariates assessed
at Wave 3 (marital status, presence of working spouse, education, welfare receipt, number
of children, and income). Results from these
additional specifications (available on request)
were identical to the main models, supporting the robustness of associations between
early maternal employment and later child
functioning.
Delineating Specific Aspects of Maternal
Employment
The final set of analyses assessed prospective
associations between individual characteristics
of maternal employment during early childhood
and childrens functioning at age 9. Several
specifications of the employment characteristics
were tested to assess potential nonlinearities
in prospective links between employment
Family Relations
characteristics and child functioning, using both
continuous measures and meaningful categories
of each variable (e.g., part-time, full-time, or
overtime hours; none, some, or all months of
insurance; below or above average wages; 1 vs.
2 or more jobs; some vs. all months employed).
The final variables assessed work hours and
health insurance receipt nonlinearly, delineating
part-time (<20 hours/week), full-time (20 to
40 hours), and overtime work (> 40 hours), and
never, sometimes, and always insured. Hourly
wages, number of jobs, and months worked were
assessed linearly. There were low to moderate
correlations between the employment variables,
ranging from 0.02 (number of jobs and hourly
wage) to 0.37 (number of months employed and
consistent insurance).
Results of models assessing individual job
characteristics simultaneously, presented in
Table 3, highlight the role of consistent receipt
of health insurance and full-time work hours
in explaining links between high-quality, stable
maternal employment experiences in early
childhood and childrens later functioning,
particularly their cognitive skills. Children of
mothers with consistent employer-provided
health insurance showed higher reading and
math skills than children of working mothers
who had no insurance (with large effect sizes of
.98 SD and .81 SD) or inconsistent insurance.
Consistent health insurance also predicted fewer
affective problems (.41 SD) and a similarly
sized, albeit only marginally significant,
difference in lower somatic problems (.49 SD)
in comparison to no insurance. Work hours also
were important. Overtime work was associated
with lower reading (.36 SD) and math skills (.63
SD) in comparison to full-time work. Job pay,
stability, and consistency were not significantly
associated with childrens later functioning, with
two exceptions: higher pay was related to lower
math skills, with a $1 per hour difference in pay
predicting a .06 SD difference in math skills; and
job transitions were related to higher reading
skills, with each additional job predicting a .15
SD increase in reading skills. Other than the
health insurance results, characteristics of maternal employment did not predict differences in
childrens emotional and behavioral functioning.
DISCUSSION
Recent decades have seen policy prescriptions aimed at promoting employment for
Math Skills
0.48 (2.87)
1.47 (3.37)
10.82 (5.39)
5.80 (2.77)
0.17 (0.39)
1.12 (0.42)
0.11 (1.93)
2.39 (1.18)
5.73 (5.58)
8.25 (4.39)+
0.28 (3.33)a
2.06 (2.28)a
**a
16.00 (3.51)
14.04 (4.5)**a
89.22 (16.69)
68.36 (13.92)
6.90
3.47
0.34
0.27
Reading Skills
1.42 (1.03)
1.04 (1.42)
0.12 (0.13)
0.31 (0.67)
0.03 (1.69)
0.05 (1.08)
2.41 (1.17)
45.47 (4.22)
5.35
0.32
Affective
Problems
0.29 (1.10)
1.22 (1.53)
0.03 (0.15)
0.72 (0.64)
0.61 (1.88)
0.97 (1.02)
0.23 (1.58)
44.98 (5.04)
2.07
0.24
Anxiety
Problems
0.66 (1.17)
1.08 (1.93)
0.00 (0.18)
0.57 (0.8)
2.44 (2.42)
0.05 (1.16)
3.24 (1.68)+
43.83 (5.50)
4.18
0.31
Somatic Problems
0.70 (1.16)
1.13 (1.89)
0.07 (0.14)
0.94 (0.7)
0.19 (1.85)
1.7 (1.23)
0.09 (1.32)
54.70 (1.25)
2.53
0.33
Hyperactivity
Problems
0.22 (1.10)
0.94 (1.28)
0.12 (0.14)
0.65 (0.57)
0.64 (1.72)
1.03 (0.97)
1.58 (1.24)
53.53 (3.91)
5.60
0.43
Oppositional
Problems
0.61 (1.22)
1.97 (1.83)
0.22 (0.22)
0.25 (0.78)
1.84 (2.29)
2.11 (1.27)+
0.73 (1.77)
51.45 (4.91)
4.04
0.35
Conduct Problems
Note: The categorical employment groups (hours and insurance) are compared to the omitted categories of full-time hours; no insurance. Within each column for these groups,
shared superscript letters are different from each other at the p < .05 level. All models controlled for the Wave 1 value of mother age, mother education and literacy skills (Wave 2),
mother marital status, employed spouse, number of minors in the household, mother employment history, mother received welfare in last 2 years, household income divided by 1,000
not including mothers income, city, and maternal employment characteristics at Wave 3 (worked the majority of past year, current weekly wage, and health insurance). Models also
controlled for child gender, race or ethnicity, lag of the dependent variable, and age at Wave 3.
+
p < .10, p < .05, p < .01.
Part-time hours
Overtime hours
Pay
No. of jobs
No. months worked
Some insurance
Insurance all 24 months
Constant
F of model
R2
Employment Characteristics
Table 3. OLS Regression Models: Employment Characteristics Predicting Child Outcomes at Wave 3 Among Employed Sample ( n = 392)
524
low-income parents as a means to economic
self-sufficiency, even among single mothers with
limited education and job skills and notable family responsibilities. The recent economic downturn has increased attention on the potentially
damaging effects of unemployment, underemployment, and poor-quality or unstable jobs on
the health and well-being of American families.
Together, these policy and economic contexts
raise questions about the labor market experiences of low-income mothers with young
children and the implications of these experiences for children and families.
Utilizing a representative sample of young
children and mothers in low-income urban families from three cities, this study sought to
extend existing research by assessing a broad
array of maternal work characteristics and their
prospective associations with childrens functioning. Prior literature on low-income womens
work experiences has shown substantial work
effort yet little success in securing high-quality
jobs and upward mobility (Johnson & Corcoran, 2003), and results of this study replicated
these patterns. A full three quarters of mothers
had some work experience during the 2-year
period of this study, although only one in six
worked consistently, with most mothers moving in and out of jobs. More concerning were
the low wage rates and limited work benefits.
Average wages were $7.65 per hour, a rate that
would put a full-time worker just above the federal poverty line for a family of three in 2000.
Moreover, one fifth of working mothers reported
wages below the federal minimum wage. Low
job quality also was exemplified by mothers
lack of employer-sponsored health insurance.
Using cluster analysis to combine characteristics of employment, we found that a majority
of mothers were in jobs that were considered
to be of low quality. Relatively few women,
only 17% of the sample, had higher quality, stable employment experiences, and results
determined that these women were more educated and had fewer children. These findings
correspond with prior literature showing limited
education of low-income parents to be a significant barrier to employment and suggest that
earlier intervention efforts to promote educational attainment and early entry into the labor
market and to delay childbearing may help support the employment success of disadvantaged
women (Danziger et al., 2000). Other research
has noted the significant challenges low-income
Family Relations
working mothers face accessing affordable and
reliable child care and balancing the demands
of family and work (Cabrera et al., 2006). It is
important to note that mothers cognitive skills
were not related to employment success, suggesting that the barriers to employment are
malleable with effective policy levers rather
than due to cognitive deficiencies that cannot
be overcome with education, job training, and
child care.
Results from this research indicate that
disadvantaged women with young children
were largely responding to the messages of
policy shifts (i.e., the work requirements of
welfare reform and the economic incentives
of the Earned Income Tax Credit) and were
entering the labor market. The data, however,
show that their labor market experiences were
somewhat sporadic and that the economic
payback was limited. When assessing their
longer term employment trajectories, it was
evident that mothers did not increase their
wage rates and employment stability over time,
climbing the economic success ladder as had
been predicted during the policy debates of the
1990s (Haskins, 2006). Notably, the late 1990s
and early 2000s was a period of substantial
economic growth when jobs were plentiful.
In the more recent economic landscape, with
heightened unemployment and poverty rates
(DeNavas-Walt, Proctor, & Smith, 2010) it is
likely that many disadvantaged families are
suffering setbacks and acute economic distress.
The long-term implications of mothers
employment experiences became evident in
our next set of analyses. In models adjusting
for child, maternal, and family characteristics,
later mother work experiences, and early childhood functioning, results showed that children
of mothers with high-quality, stable employment experiences during their preschool years
showed enhanced cognitive and socioemotional
functioning at age 9 in comparison to their peers
whose mothers were consistently unemployed or
had poor-quality work experiences. Specifically,
mothers with stable, high-quality employment
had children with higher reading skills later in
childhood in comparison to children of mothers
with low-quality employment experiences, and
higher math skills in comparison to their peers
whose mothers had remained out of the labor
market. The children of mothers with highquality employment also showed fewer emotional and behavioral problems later in childhood
525
526
to reiterate the limitations. The associations
between maternal work experiences and child
functioning discussed in this research were correlational and cannot be construed as causal. The
analyses assessed prospective relationships and
controlled for a range of measured characteristics of children, mothers, and families that were
associated with mothers employment patterns,
yet it is possible that other unmeasured factors were linked to both maternal employment
and child functioning patterns. For example, the
quality and stability of nonparental child care
may play an important role in explaining associations between maternal employment and child
functioning. As well, the targeted nature of the
sample, which was representative of children in
low-income families in low-income urban neighborhoods in three cities during the late 1990s,
must be acknowledged. Results cannot necessarily be generalized to other demographic groups,
contexts, or historical periods. Indeed, in the
more recent economic climate, the work success
of many single mothers and mothers with limited
education and job skills likely has suffered, with
greater bouts of unemployment and even more
limited pay and benefits (DeNavas-Walt et al.,
2010). Finally, information on job characteristics came from a single source and did not cover
all potentially important characteristics or experiences in secondary or truly short-term jobs.
Beyond the causal strength of the relationships and the targeted nature of the sample,
the results reiterate important patterns in child
and family well-being. Notably, results suggest
that children of mothers in unstable and lowquality job patterns show indicators of concern
across numerous arenas of functioning, pointing
to this group as an important target of intervention and prevention efforts to promote childrens
cognitive and emotional well-being. Results further suggest that policy efforts to enhance the
stability and quality of jobs, specifically the benefits that come from health insurance, may be
an important potential mechanism to improve
the well-being of low-income mothers and their
children. As policy analysts argued in the 1990s,
moving up the employment ladder may provide the surest route to both economic stability
and healthy family functioning with long-term
beneficial implications for childrens development. When parents lack adequate education and
skills, employee protections are weakened, and
the economy has an inadequate need for lower
Family Relations
skilled workers, the private market may not provide jobs with adequate supports for workers at
the bottom of the economic chain.
In the current policy and economic context,
these results point to the potential broader implications of policies such as minimum wages and
wage supplements, access to health insurance
and other benefits (e.g., paid sick and vacation leave), and mechanisms to improve the
education and work skills of disadvantaged parents and to support work stability. Although
our national policy priorities currently are targeted at unemployment, these findings suggest
that underemployment, unstable employment,
and low-paid jobs without benefits also deserve
attention. Policymakers must consider the influence policies targeting these issues could have
on low-income mothers economic stability and
the healthy development of their children.
NOTE
Funding for the Three-City Study was provided by the
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
(RO1 HD36093), Office of the Assistant Secretary of
Planning and Evaluation, Administration on Developmental
Disabilities, Administration for Children and Families,
Social Security Administration, and National Institute of
Mental Health; the Boston Foundation; the Annie E. Casey
Foundation; the Edna McConnell Clark Foundation; the
Lloyd A. Fry Foundation; the Hogg Foundation for Mental
Health; the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; the Joyce
Foundation; the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; the
W. K. Kellogg Foundation; the Kronkosky Charitable
Foundation; the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur
Foundation; the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation; the
David and Lucile Packard Foundation; the Searle Fund
for Policy Research; and the Woods Fund of Chicago. The
content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does
not necessarily represent the official views of the Eunice
Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and
Human Development or the National Institutes of Health or
of other grantors. The authors extend a special thank you
to the children and families who participated in Welfare,
Children, & Families: A Three-City Study.
REFERENCES
Achenbach, T. M. (1992). Manual for the Child
Behavior Checklist/2-3 and 1992 Profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychology.
Achenbach, T. M., Dumenci, L., & Rescorla, L. A.
(2003). DSM-orientated and empirically based
approaches to constructing scales from the same
item pools. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 32, 328 340. doi:10.1207/
S15374424JCCP3203_02
527
Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. B. (2001). Pattern
classification and scene analysis (2nd ed.). New
York: Wiley.
Duncan, G. J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (1997). Consequences of growing up poor. New York: Russell
Sage Foundation.
Dunifon, R., Kalil, A., & Danziger, S. K. (2003).
Maternal work behavior under welfare reform:
How does the transition from welfare to work
affect child development? Children and Youth
Services Review, 25, 55 82. doi:10.1016/S01907409(02)00266-9
Elder, G. (1997). The life course and human
development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & R.
Lerner (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology:
Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development
(5th ed., pp. 939 991). New York: Wiley.
Han, W., Waldfogel, J., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2001).
The effects of early maternal employment on later
cognitive and behavioral outcomes. Journal of
Marriage and Family, 63, 336 354. doi:10.1111/
j.1741-3737.2001.00336.x
Haskins, R. (2006). Work over welfare: The inside
story of the 1996 Welfare Reform Law. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the
economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312, 1900 1902. doi:10.1126/
science.1128898
Hill, H. D., & Morris, P. (2008). Welfare policies
and very young children: Experimental data on
stage-environment fit. Developmental Psychology,
44, 1557 1571. doi:10.1037/a0013913
Hill, J. L., Waldfogel, J., Brooks-Gunn, J., &
Han, W. (2005). Maternal employment and child
development: A fresh look using newer methods. Developmental Psychology, 41, 833 850.
doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.833
Johnson, R. C., & Corcoran, M. E. (2003). The road
to economic self-sufficiency: Job quality and job
transition patterns after welfare reform. Journal of
Policy Analysis and Management, 22, 615 639.
doi:10.1002/pam.1015
Kalil, A., Dunifon, R. E., & Danziger, S. K. (2001).
Does maternal employment mandated by welfare
reform affect parenting behavior? In G. J. Duncan
& L. Chase-Lansdale (Eds.), For better or worse:
Welfare reform and the well-being of children and
families (pp. 154 178). New York: Russell Sage
Foundation.
Kessler, R., & Greenberg, E. F. (1981). Linear panel
analysis: Models of quantitative change. New
York: Academic Press.
Lucas-Thompson, R. G., Goldberg, W. A., &
Prause, J. (2010). Maternal work early in the
lives of children and its distal associations with
achievement and behavior problems: A metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 915 942.
doi:10.1037/a0020875
528
Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. (1985). An
examination of procedures for determining the
number of clusters in a dataset. Psychometrika, 50,
159 179.
Morris, P. A., & Gennetian, L. A. (2003). Identifying
the effects of income on childrens development
using experimental data. Journal of Marriage
and Family, 65, 716 729. doi:10.1111/j.17413737.2003.00716.x
Morris, P., & Michalopoulos, C. (2003). Findings
from the Self-Sufficiency Project: Effects on children and adolescents of a program that increased
employment and income. Applied Developmental
Psychology, 24, 201 239. doi:10.1016/S01933973(03)00045-5
Osborne, C., & Knab, J. (2007). Work, welfare, and
young childrens health and behavior in the Fragile
Families and Child Wellbeing Study. Children and
Youth Services Review, 29, 762 781.
Parcel, T. L., & Menaghan, E. G. (1994). Early
parental work, family social capital, and early
childhood outcomes. The American Journal of
Sociology, 99, 972 1009. doi:10.1086/230369
Pavetti, L., & Acs, G. (2001). Moving up, moving
out, or going nowhere? A study of the employment
patterns of young women and the implications for
welfare mothers. Journal of Policy Analysis and
Management, 20, 721 736.
Ruhm, C. (2000). Parental employment and child
cognitive development. NBER Working Paper
No. 7666. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau for
Economic Research.
Secret, M., & Peck-Heath, C. (2004). Maternal labor
force participation and child well-being in public
assistance families. Journal of Family Issues, 25,
520 541. doi:10.1177/0192513X03257761
Family Relations
Slack, K. S., Magnuson, K. A., Berger, L. M., Yoo,
J., Coley, R. L., Dunifon, R., . . . Osborne, C.
(2007). Family economic well-being following
the 1996 welfare reform: Trend data from five
non-experimental panel studies. Children and
Youth Services Review, 29, 698 720. doi:10.1016/
j.childyouth.2006.12.002
U.S. Census Bureau. (2009). Current population
survey table creator. Retrieved from www.census.
gov/hhes/www/cpstc/cps_table_creator.html
Wills, J. B., & Brauer, J. R. (2012). Have children
adapted to their mothers working, or was adaption
unnecessary? Cohort effects and the relationship
between maternal employment and child wellbeing. Social Science Research, 41, 425 443.
doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.10.004
Winston, P., Angel, R., Burton, L., Cherlin, A.,
Moffitt, M., & Wilson, W. J. (1999). Welfare,
children, and families: A three-city study, overview
and design report. Retrieved from www.jhu.edu/
welfare.
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989, 1990).
Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational BatteryRevised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Woodcock, R. W., & Munoz-Sandoval, A. F.
(1996). Bateria Woodcock-Munoz: Pruebas de
aprovechamiento-Revisada. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Yoshikawa, H., & Seidman, E. (2001). Multidimensional profiles of welfare and work dynamics: Development, validation, and associations
with child cognitive and mental health outcomes.
American Journal of Community Psychology, 29,
907 936. doi:10.1023/A:1012967616026