0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
8 vues7 pages
Inquiry lessons often begin by having students evaluate their current understanding of a topic. There is a potential that lesson study could be conducted at an entirely superficial level. To prevent superficial lesson study, the facilitator of the lesson study team needs to understand the deep nature of lesson study.
Inquiry lessons often begin by having students evaluate their current understanding of a topic. There is a potential that lesson study could be conducted at an entirely superficial level. To prevent superficial lesson study, the facilitator of the lesson study team needs to understand the deep nature of lesson study.
Inquiry lessons often begin by having students evaluate their current understanding of a topic. There is a potential that lesson study could be conducted at an entirely superficial level. To prevent superficial lesson study, the facilitator of the lesson study team needs to understand the deep nature of lesson study.
1. What factors need to be considered during the selection of the student learning goal?
II. Issues in Defining a Learning Goal
2. What role should the California Content Standards play in the selection of the learning goal?
II. Issues in Defining a Learning Goal
3. What role should existing curriculum (and its perceived strengths or weaknesses) play in the selection of the learning goal?
IV. Incorporating Inquiry into Lesson Design
In an inquiry-based lesson, students are guided through a process in which they each must construct meaning. Inquiry lessons often begin by having the students evaluate their current understanding of a topic. Students then have the opportunity to test and experiment with their current ideas, carefully guided by the teacher. The experimentation, if set-up correctly, will often cause the students to re-evaluate their understanding of a concept. After reflecting on the experience, the students elaborate on how their understanding has changed. The goal of inquiry is to create a situation where the students can explain the concepts to the teacher, not for the teacher to simply give the concepts to the student. At the conclusion of this process, the students often desperately want to know the correct or scientific answer, and only at this point of cognitive engagement would it be appropriate to explain the scientific viewpoint.
V. Conclusion: The Potential for Superficial Lesson Study
There is a potential that lesson study could be
conducted at an entirely superficial level if: 1. Lesson study teams do not address the types of deep questions we have discussed today. 2. Lesson study teams become distracted from a single lesson and instead begin to develop whole units of study. To prevent superficial lesson study, the facilitator of the lesson study team needs to fully understand the deep nature of lesson study, and needs to constantly push the lesson study team towards the deeper questions. The team itself needs to fully understand the goals of the lesson study process before agreeing to participate on a lesson study team.
Lesson study will only be successful, both in the short
term and in the long term, if it is conducted by participants with the following qualities: 1. Willing teachers who have volunteered to participate. 2. Reflective teachers willing to question and change their teaching practices. 3. Teachers focused on improving student understanding.
CONTACT INFORMATION Rich Hedman RHedman@natomas.k12.ca.us Cristina McFadden CMcFadden@natomas.k12.ca.us Erik Nemer ENemer@natomas.k12.ca.us