Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
Teacher
Program
Admission
Requirements
Require
all
graduate
level
teacher
education
programs
in
the
state
to
adopt
a
minimum
GRE
score
and
require
a
GPA
of
at
least
3.0.
A.3010/S.2010
Education
Reform,
Part
A,
Subpart
A
1
Underlined
text
highlights
where
the
Assembly
was
able
to
make
changes
1
ISSUE
Graduate
Program
Deregistration
and
Suspension
A.3010/S.2010
Reform,
Part
A,
Subpart
A
2
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
Underlined
text
highlights
where
the
Assembly
was
able
to
make
changes
ISSUE
Teacher
Registration
&
Continuing
Education
A.3010/S.2010
Education
Reform,
Part
A,
Subpart
A
3
&
4
Teacher
and
Principal
Tenure
A.3010/S.2010
Education
Reform,
Part
A,
Subpart
C
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
Require
teachers
to
re-register
with
SED
every
5
years
and
complete
a
minimum
of
100
hours
of
continuing
education
every
5
years.
Requires
teachers
to
re-register
with
SED
every
5
years
and
complete
a
minimum
of
100
hours
of
more
rigorous
continuing
education
every
5
years
as
approved
by
SED
starting
in
July
2016.
Establish
a
probationary
period
of
5
years
for
teachers
and
principals.
Require
that
teachers
and
principals
earn
5
consecutive
APPR
ratings
of
at
least
effective
to
be
eligible
for
tenure.
Provide
that
probationary
employees
may
be
terminated
at
any
time
during
the
probationary
period.
Repeal
provision
that
limits
a
school
districts
authority
to
terminate
a
probationary
teacher
or
principal
due
to
their
performance
in
the
classroom
or
school.
Establishes
a
probationary
period
of
4
years
for
teachers
and
principals.
Requires
that
teachers
and
principals
earn
an
APPR
rating
of
effective
or
highly
effective
in
at
least
three
of
the
four
years
to
be
eligible
for
tenure.
If
a
teacher
or
principal
earns
an
ineffective
in
the
fourth
year,
the
teacher
or
principal
would
be
ineligible
for
tenure
and
the
probationary
period
may
be
extended
.
School
districts
have
the
unfettered
authority
to
terminate
a
probationary
teacher,
even
for
performance
in
the
classroom
Underlined
text
highlights
where
the
Assembly
was
able
to
make
changes
ISSUE
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
Takeover
and
Provide
that
school
districts
that
scored
in
lowest
School
districts
will
not
be
eligible
for
receivership.
Restructuring
of
2.5%
of
districts
based
on
certain
student
Failing
School
achievement
and
outcomes,
a
district
review
team
Districts
would
be
appointed
by
the
commissioner
to
assess
and
report
on
the
reasons
for
the
chronic
underperformance
of
the
school
district,
and
such
A.3010/S.2010
districts
would
be
subject
to
receivership.
Education
Reform,
Part
A,
Subpart
D
1
Takeover
and
Restructuring
of
Failing
Schools
A.3010/S.2010
Education
Reform,
Part
A
Subpart
D
2
Provide
that
individual
schools
that
scored
in
the
lowest
5%
of
schools
(priority
schools)
for
3
consecutive
years
based
on
certain
student
achievement
measures
will
be
placed
in
receivership
in
which
the
receiver
shall
manage
and
operate
the
school
and
develop
and
implement
a
school
intervention
plan.
Provide
that
the
receiver
would
have
the
power
of
the
superintendent
and
board
of
education
(BOE)
and
the
power
to
supersede
decisions
of
the
superintendent
or
BOE.
Provide
that
after
consultation
with
local
stakeholders,
the
receiver
shall
develop
a
school
intervention
plan
bases
on
certain
student
outcome
data.
The
plan
must
include
certain
annual
measurable
goals.
The
turnaround
plan
4
Provide
that
a
school
would
be
designated
as
failing
by
the
commissioner
if
the
school
is
in
the
lowest
achieving
5%
of
schools
statewide
(priority
schools)
for
at
least
3
consecutive
years
or
persistently
failing
if
the
school
is
in
the
states
lowest
accountability
status
for
at
least
10
consecutive
years.
$75
million
grant
for
such
persistently
failing
schools
will
be
available
beginning
in
July,
2015
Upon
designation,
the
district
must
establish
a
community
engagement
team,
which
must
include
community
stakeholders
such
as
parents,
teachers,
principals,
and
students,
to
develop
recommendations
for
improvement
through
public
engagement.
Underlined
text
highlights
where
the
Assembly
was
able
to
make
changes
ISSUE
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
shall
be
authorized
for
not
more
than
three
years.
Provide
that
in
the
plan,
the
receiver
must:
(1)
establish
community
schools;
(2)
modify
curriculum
or
program
offerings;
(3)
replace
unqualified
teachers/administrators;
(3)
provide
funds,
subject
to
appropriation,
to
increase
salaries
of
teachers
and
administrators;
(4)
establish
steps
to
improve
hiring,
teacher
evaluations,
and
professional
development.
Authorize
the
receiver
to
take
other
actions
to
support
the
plan,
including
converting
a
district
school
to
a
charter
school,
reallocating
resources,
adding
full
day
pre-k
and
kindergarten,
modifying
collective
bargaining
provisions,
lengthening
the
school
day/year,
and
requiring
certain
professional
development.
Authorize
the
receiver
to
supersede
all
employment
decisions
made
by
the
BOE
and
alter
collective
bargaining
agreements,
except
for
compensation
without
a
reduction
in
hours.
Establish
new
procedures
relating
to
seniority
for
the
termination
of
staff
when
a
position
is
abolished
in
a
school.
5
ISSUE
EXECUTIVE
FINAL
STATE
BUDGET
PROPOSAL
Authorize
the
receiver
to
terminate
the
positions
of
The
receiver
would
be
appointed
by
the
local
district
and
all
teachers
and
supervisory
staff
(excluding
tenured
principals)
at
the
school
and
require
these
approved
by
the
commissioner.
Failure
to
agree
on
a
receiver
employees
to
reapply
for
their
positions.
in
60
days
results
in
the
commissioner
appointing
the
receiver.
Provide
that
upon
the
expiration
of
the
school
The
receiver
would
be
paid
for
by
the
state,
and
may
be
a
intervention
plan,
the
commissioner
may
determine
whether
the
school
has
improved
non-profit
entity,
another
school
district,
or
an
individual.
sufficiently
to
no
longer
be
identified
as
failing,
or
may
renew
the
current
plan
for
up
to
an
additional
Receiver
must
develop
an
intervention
plan
for
up
to
three
three
years,
or
appoint
a
new
receiver.
years
in
consultation
with
local
stakeholders
and
approved
by
the
commissioner,
and
must
consider
the
recommendations
of
the
community
engagement
team.
The
receiver
would
have
managerial
and
operational
control
of
the
school.
The
receiver
would
have
the
power
to
supersede
any
decision
that
conflicts
with
the
plan,
except
for
the
decisions
regarding
building
usage
plans,
co-location
decisions,
and
transportation
of
students.
The
receiver
can
also
supersede
employment
decisions
of
BOE.
The
receiver
can
review
and
modify
proposed
school
district
budgets
as
they
pertain
to
the
school.
The
receiver
must
convert
schools
to
community
schools.
Underlined
text
highlights
where
the
Assembly
was
able
to
make
changes
6
ISSUE
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
ISSUE
Tenured
Employee
Disciplinary
Process
A.3010/S.2010
Education
Reform,
Part
A,
Subpart
E
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
ISSUE
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
for
removal.
Authorize
suspension
without
pay
if
an
employee
is
charged
with
misconduct
constituting
physical
or
sexual
abuse
of
a
student.
Provide
that
employees
charged
with
misconduct
constituting
physical
or
sexual
abuse
of
a
student
shall
be
subject
to
an
expedited
hearing.
Provide
that
full
and
fair
disclosure
of
the
witnesses
and
evidence
shall
be
made
by
both
parties
pursuant
to
Article
three
and
four
of
the
State
Administrative
Procedures
Act.
Provide
that
three
consecutive
ineffective
ratings
shall
constitute
prima
facie
evidence
of
incompetence
that
can
only
be
rebutted
by
clear
and
convincing
evidence
that
the
calculation
of
one
or
more
subcomponents
of
the
APPR
score
was
fraudulent,
which
includes
mistaken
identity.
School
district
must
bring
3020-a
charges
after
three
consecutive
ineffective
ratings.
A
board
of
education
may
suspend
an
employee
charged
with
misconduct
constituting
physical
or
sexual
abuse
of
a
student
without
pay,
pending
an
expedited
hearing
by
a
single
hearing
officer,
for
up
to
120
days.
A
probable
cause
hearing
would
be
held
within
10
days
of
board
determination
to
bring
a
disciplinary
proceeding
against
an
employee,
where
a
hearing
officer
shall
determine
if
suspension
without
pay
should
continue
or
be
reversed
upon
a
finding
that
probable
cause
does
not
support
the
charges,
or
upon
a
written
determination
that
a
suspension
without
pay
is
grossly
disproportionate.
If
hearing
officer
finds
in
favor
of
the
teacher,
then
teacher
receives
back
pay
with
6%
interest.
NYC
does
not
change
because
they
have
their
own
procedures.
ISSUE
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
Authorize
children
to
testify
through
sworn
written
or
video
statements.
Provide
that
failure
of
the
school
district
to
rehabilitate
the
teacher
or
principal
shall
not
be
a
defense
and
shall
not
be
considered
by
the
hearing
officer
in
determining
the
penalty
or
other
action
to
be
imposed.
Require
the
hearing
officer
to
adopt
the
penalty
recommended
by
the
school
district
unless
the
hearing
officer
concludes
the
BOE
acted
in
bad
faith
or
there
are
extraordinary
circumstances
in
which
the
recommended
penalty
would
be
so
disproportionate
as
to
shock
the
conscience
of
the
hearing
officer.
10
Require
the
hearing
officer
to
give
serious
consideration
to
the
penalty
recommended
by
the
board
of
education,
and
if
the
hearing
officer
rejects
that
penalty,
it
must
be
based
on
a
reasons
based
upon
the
record
as
expressed
in
a
written
determination.
Underlined
text
highlights
where
the
Assembly
was
able
to
make
changes
ISSUE
Charter
Schools
A.3010/S.2010
Education
Reform,
Part
A,
Subpart
F
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
Rejected
ISSUE
Teacher Evaluations
A.3010/S.2010
Education
Reform,
Part
B
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
Provide
that
50%
of
the
APPR
score
shall
be
based
on
state
assessments
or
other
comparable
measures
and
50%
based
on
other
measures
of
teacher
or
principal
effectiveness,
of
which
35%
must
be
determined
by
at
least
one
unannounced
independent
evaluator.
Provide
that
the
Commissioner
shall
establish
scoring
ranges
for
each
subcomponent.
Provide
that
a
student
may
not
be
instructed
for
two
consecutive
school
years
by
teachers
that
received
an
ineffective
APPR
rating
in
the
prior
school
year.
Provide
that
if
a
teacher
or
principal
receives
an
ineffective
rating
of
any
subcomponent
of
the
APPR,
the
highest
overall
composite
rating
he/she
can
receive
is
developing.
ISSUE
NYC
Mayoral
Control
EXECUTIVE
PROPOSAL
Extend
mayoral
control
provisions
for
the
NYC
school
district
until
June
30,
2018.
A.3010/S.2010
Education
Reform,
Part
C
Programmatic
Contingency
to
State
Aid
A.3010/S.2010
Education
Reform,
Part
D
13
Rejected