Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
UVA-F-1386
University of Virginia
It was the end of December 1998, and Mr. Dong-Hyun Kim, Chairman of the Board of
Managing Directors and President of Korea First Bank (KFB) was reflecting over the last two
tumultuous years, by far, the most challenging years in the 70-year long history of Korea First
Bank. As many banks in Korea, KFB had suffered tremendously as a result of the Asian Crisis
during 1997. However, what was most present in Mr. Kims mind were the many problems tha t
KFB was entangled with, even in the absence of the crisis, most notably, the exposure of KFB to
Hanbo Steel, a member of the Hanbo chaebol, whose bankruptcy in January 1997 threatened the
mere existence of KFB. Not only was KFBs exposure to Hanbo disproportionally large, but also
this large exposure was allegedly facilitated by large commissions received by the previous
president of KFB. Both he and the president of Cho Hung Bank were arrested early 1997 for
their involvement in the case. 1 Was this event something that KFB would be able to disassociate
itself with and move forward, or was this something that was lingering and might manifest itself
in a different way in the future? Were there other types of operational risk that the bank had yet
to identify? Mr. Kim took a pen in his hand and started jotting down all the types of risk that the
bank faced: credit, interest rate, exchange rate, market, liquidity, and operational risk. How were
all these risk exposures identified and managed at KFB? What could KFB have done differently
during the last two years to have managed those risks better, so that it could have weathered the
Asian crisis and the downturn in the Korean economy? What should the Korean government or
the international regulators have done differently, so that KFB would not have reached the brink
of collapse? He immediately started poring over the annual reports of the past two years
(Exhibits 1 & 2 show consolidated balance sheet and income statement information). He was
determined to propose the conduct of an exhaustive study of risks and risk management actions
at KFB in the next meeting of the Board.
See Thompson Bankwatch Inc., Korea First Bank Report, February 11, 1997 and September 27, 1991.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
This case was prepared by George Allayannis, Assistant Professor of Business Administration. This case was
written as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate effective or ineffective handling of an administrative
situation. Copyright 2002 by the University of Virginia Darden School Foundation, Charlottesville, VA (revised
2003). All rights reserved. To order copies, send an e-mail to dardencases@virginia.edu. No part of this
publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by
any meanselectronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwisewithout the permission of the Darden
School Foundation.
-2-
UVA-F- 1386
See Banking System Report: South Korea, Thompson Bank Watch Inc., April 28, 1998.
-3-
UVA-F- 1386
was Koreas traditional engine behind its vibrant economy exhibited immense slowdown: the
rate of growth decreased to 15% from a high of 31% the previous years. 3 Much of the decrease
in exports growth was due to the relative appreciation of the Korean won versus the yen, whic h
affected the competitiveness of Korean exporters and the sharp decline in the price of computer
chips, automobiles and ships, which constitute some of the major Korean exports. At the same
time, interest rates increased, putting even more pressure on corporate profits. In January 1997,
Hanbo Steel, the 14th largest chaebol went bankrupt. Another steel producer, the Samni group,
followed suit. Then came Jinros turn, the 19th largest chaebol, and the Ssangyong business
group, the 6th largest. In July 1997, Kia motors, the third largest automotive company defaulted
on its loans. The stock market responded and by November it was 50% down compared to its
peak in mid-1997. The won fell by 50% in the course of two weeks in November. The Korean
bonds were downgraded by Moodys and S&P to junk status early December and many foreign
institutional investors had to drop them from their portfolios. The Korean government sought the
help of the IMF and in January 1998 Korea was able to sign a deal with a consortium of
international lenders for the rollover of $60 billion of its debt under quite favorable terms. This
in turn, allowed the Korean government to guarantee $24 billion of bank debt. The Korean banks
desperately needed the help. With huge exposure to faltering industrial conglomerates and
mounting losses from equity investments in the Korean market, many banks were close to
bankruptcy. Some argued that the Korean banking system, modeled after the Japanese system as
a relationship banking system was in part to be blamed for the situation. 4 Relationship banking
allows for close contact and communication between borrowers and lenders-the idea is that
lenders have access to information regarding business conditions and investment on an on-going
and timely basis; however, the system is also open to manipulation and often it takes time for
information to reach the lender. 5
See The Korean Financial Crisis of 1997-98, I. Adelman and Song Byung Nak, University of California,
Berkeley Working Paper.
4
See The Korean Financial Crisis of 1997-98, I. Adelman and Song Byung Nak, University of California,
Berkeley Working Paper.
5
An alternative system, that of arms length relationships is at the foundation of the banking system in the US and
UK, among other countries.
6
See Korea First Bank Annual Report, 1998.
-4-
UVA-F- 1386
centers as New York, London, and Hong Kong. KFB was also on the forefront of automation
and became the first bank to connect all of its 105 domestic branches with on- line banking
services in December 1980. The 1990s saw continued expansion in other areas of banking and
despite increasing competition by foreign banks the bank reported its highest profits for 3
consecutive years in the early nineties.
Korea First Bank 1997-1998
By far the most significant event in the two- year period for KFB was the bankruptcy of
Hanbo Steel Corporation, one of the banks largest borrowers. Specifically, the estimated
exposure of KFB to Hanbo Steel was in the order of $1 billion (out of Hanbos total debt of $6
billion). 7 Hanbo was established in 1974 by Mr. Chung Tai-soo, as a construction company who
took advantage of his government contacts to obtain scarce bank capital from state-controlled
banks. Like other chaebols, Hanbo expanded into other unrelated businesses acquiring a steel
company in 1989, a pharmaceutical company in 1993, and a mutual savings and finance
company in 1994. 8 Hanbo decided to build the worlds largest steel mill in 1993. Costs for the
project grew almost to double of what was budgeted and amounted to W5700 billion; at the same
time, steel demand was in the decline. With only W315 billion in shareholders equity the debt to
equity ratio of Hanbo Steel shot to 1600 per cent. Analysts were puzzled by the lending of
W5000 billion by Korean banks without a feasibility study of the steel project and without
securing adequate collateral for the loans. It was obvious that the banks did not pay any attention
to the government restrictions on excessive lending to the chaebols. 9 Hanbo has had very close
relationships with KFB, its main creditor. In 1995, when Youone, a big construction company,
went into bankruptcy and was a serious threat to KFBs amount of non-performing loans and
earnings, Hanbo acquired Youone to decrease KFBs exposure. In June 1997, four former
executives of KFB were sued for negligence in the Hanbo Steel loaning case, believed to be the
first such lawsuit in South Korea. Two former presidents of the bank who were mentioned in the
lawsuit were already convicted for accepting bribes from Hanbo in exchange for the loans. A
picture of KFB as reflected by its stock price during 1997-1998 is shown on Figure 1 along with
a graph of the Korean Total Market Index for comparison. Figure 2 compares the normalizedmarket values of KFB, the Korean Finance Index, and the Total Market Value.
See Korea First Bank (A), Harvard Business School, case 9-701-022, Exhibit 3.
See Financial Times, January 28, 1997.
9
See Financial Times, January 28, 1997.
8
-5-
UVA-F- 1386
1996, 1997 and 1998 broken down by currency (won versus foreign) and by industry. Exhibit 5
shows equity return correlations among the main industrial segments in Korea, and Figure 3
graphs the relative stock price performance of four of the main industries that KFBs loans were
concentrated in. Exhibits 6 & 7 show KFBs Non-Performing loan data and its Loan Loss
Reserves, while Exhibit 8 shows related data for some of KFBs main Korean competitors as
well as for a US bank of similar size. Mr. Kim was also concerned about lending excessively to
chaebols- it was not clear that the data he had collected could definitively allow him to address
this question, but at the minimum, it was a good start.
Mr. Kim then moved on to the data describing KFBs investment holdings (See Exhibit
9). He thought that this data could help him better understand KFBs market risk. Two of his
major concerns were the exposure of interest and foreign exchange risk. He feared that KFBs
interest and FX risk were high and could potentially threaten KFBs operations. How could he
quantify these exposures? He thought that data on interest rate sensitivity (Exhibit 10), on
interest generating assets and liabilities broken down by won and foreign currency (Exhibit 11)
and KFBs Net Interest Income and Expense (Exhibit 12) would be most helpful. He also took a
look at 2 graphs, one depicting a normalized country prime rate comparison (Figure 4) and one
depicting normalized Asia-pacific currencies versus the US Dollar (Figure 5). Finally, he
thought that the Maturity Gap data would give him a good indication of KFBs liquidity risk (See
Exhibit 13).
Clearly, identifying the risk exposures would be the first priority of KFB, but by far, the
most important step would be to decide on how to manage these risks. Did KFB possess any
competitive advantages in any of these risks? Should they manage some risks and not others?
Should they manage all of them? To what extent should they be managed? He realized that he
needed to quantify some of the risks and had heard about the KMV methodology that is used to
estimate credit risk (default probability) using the standard deviation of the assets as one of the
inputs. By making some assumptions, he hoped that data on equity volatility (Exhibit 14) could
be used instead. He felt that he had to go back in time and estimate these default probabilities
and see for himself whether KFB could have done anything different ly to avoid the crisis. He
also knew that there are board members who would say to him that: our shareholders are
entrusting us in taking some risks: if we do not take any risks, we are not enhancing shareholder
value. What could he reply to them?
-6-
UVA-F- 1386
Exhibit I
Korea First Bank
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(all figures in millions of Korean Won except for exchange rate data)
Exchange Rate
1998
1997
1996
1204
1600
841
2,614,021
15,025,982
3,176,037
20,360,639
3,708,713
20,208,399
call loans
securities
577,694
8,309,811
218,819
9,022,784
321,010
11,781,655
foreign exchange
customers liabilities on guarantees
1,422,998
1,466,348
2,481,595
3,510,978
2,674,736
4,475,788
1,830,423
2,250,808
1,093,474
1,876,511
876,068
1,968,187
33,498,085
50,362
41,791,199
100,724
46,115,280
deposits
call money
22,478,076
179,718
27,581,402
1,031,542
26,910,616
2,162,595
borrowings
guarantees outstanding
provisions
4,211,966
1,466,348
2,430,539
5,908,450
3,510,978
1,206,061
7,291,511
4,475,788
other liabilities
2,570,805
33,337,452
2,367,466
41,605,899
3,361,945
44,202,455
109,389
115,277
144,367
1,600,000
16,610
820,000
213,820
820,000
502,361
(1,914,597)
349,231
(963,881)
(408)
446,446
(1,180)
LIABILITIES
MINORITY INTERESTS
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
common stock
capital surplus
retained earnings
capital adjustment
consolidation adjustment credit
51,244
492
70,023
831
1,768,458
33,498,085
41,791,199
46,115,280
-7-
UVA-F- 1386
Exhibit 2
Korea First Bank
Statement Of Operations
(all figures in million of Korean Won except for exhchange rate figures)
Exchange Rate
1998
1997
1996
1204
1600
841
2,359,264
2,401,889
2,183,425
356,054
420,353
299,710
857,854
263,505
318,821
1,207,088
294,614
737,430
122,577
612,296
157,077
178,448
98,297
4,295,388
4,611,442
3,961,872
Interest expense
fees and commissions
3,158,489
24,138
3,024,548
26,567
2,718,878
23,568
390,406
2,932,734
477,510
1,745,687
451,442
726,742
non-operating expenses
478,425
6,984,192
980,884
6,255,196
20,740
3,941,370
(2,688,804)
(1,643,754)
Expenses
320
(2,689,124)
14,655
50,178
6,382
(2,731,029)
5,402
(1,649,156)
14,243
50,130
117
(1,685,160)
20,502
10,451
10,051
(4,898)
50,064
(5,400)
(39,511)
-8-
UVA-F- 1386
Exhibit 3
Nationwide Commercial Banks Ranked by Size
1
2
3
4
Hanil Bank
Kookmin Bank
5
6
7
8
9
Shinhan Bank
Seoulbank
Housing and Commercial Bank
10
11
Boram Bank
Donghwa Bank
12
13
Hana Bank
KorAm Bank
14
15
DongNam Bank
Daedong Bank
16
Peace Bank
Source: Thompson Bankwatch Inc., Banking System Report: South Korea, April 28, 1998.
-9-
UVA-F- 1386
Exhibit 4
Korea First Bank
Loan Data
(all figures in billion of Korean Won)
1998
1997
total
Exchange Rate
1204
1996
total
1600
%
total
841
6,457.6
50.4%
7,479.7
45.1%
8,787.0
53.3%
Household Loans
Local L/C Bills Bought
1,374.0
58.6
10.7%
0.5%
1,948.3
29.4
11.7%
0.2%
1,626.8
112.1
9.9%
0.7%
Advances to Customers
Total
Foreign Currency Denominated
506.1
8,396.3
3.9%
146.2
9,603.6
0.9%
252.9
10,778.8
1.5%
Onshore
3,554.6
27.7%
6,397.6
38.5%
5,159.0
31.3%
Offshore
Domestic Import Usance Bills
596.8
0.1
4.7%
0.0%
441.1
5.8
2.7%
0.0%
278.9
1.4
1.7%
0.0%
Advances to Customers
Total
TOTAL LOAN PORTFOLIO
267.8
4,419.3
12,815.6
2.1%
151.1
6,995.6
16,599.2
0.9%
252.9
5,692.2
16,471.0
1.5%
1998
total
%
1997
total
%
1996
total
233.5 3.6%
288.9
3.9%
402.8
4.6%
Chemicals
Textile & Garments
407.7 6.3%
571.4 8.8%
432.5
544.6
5.8%
7.3%
486.9
668.3
5.5%
7.6%
Construction
Wholesale & Retail
586.4 9.1%
616.3 9.5%
651.5
941.7
8.7%
12.6%
1278
1057.1
14.5%
12.0%
4042.3 62.6%
6457.6
4620.5
7479.7
61.8%
4893.9
8787
55.7%
Others
TOTAL
-10-
UVA-F-1386
Exhibit 5
INDUSTRY CORRELATIONS
(Korean Stock Market Industry Index Data from period 1993-1998)
General Market
Paper
Natural Metals
Wholesale
Transport.
Textile/Apparel
Construction
Financial
Electronics
Food/Beverage
Basic Metals
Chemicals
Transport Eqpt.
Machinery
Investments
Insurance
Medical
General Market
100.0%
89.4%
97.5%
90.1%
95.7%
96.9%
96.4%
87.6%
70.8%
70.8%
85.7%
95.9%
90.0%
82.0%
91.3%
55.5%
53.1%
Paper
89.4%
100.0%
87.5%
74.1%
91.4%
93.8%
85.8%
72.0%
69.3%
84.3%
76.7%
94.4%
73.7%
65.7%
84.7%
47.0%
71.1%
Natural Metals
97.5%
87.5%
100.0%
94.4%
91.8%
97.1%
97.7%
90.4%
57.5%
65.3%
82.1%
95.3%
93.9%
87.3%
92.2%
44.0%
48.9%
Wholesale
90.1%
74.1%
94.4%
100.0%
81.2%
90.1%
95.6%
96.9%
37.5%
41.4%
68.4%
85.4%
99.2%
96.3%
90.4%
22.9%
26.9%
Transportation
95.7%
91.4%
91.8%
81.2%
100.0%
94.7%
90.5%
76.6%
78.5%
73.8%
87.3%
94.3%
81.2%
70.6%
85.7%
55.1%
52.4%
Textile/Aparel
96.9%
93.8%
97.1%
90.1%
94.7%
100.0%
96.3%
87.4%
63.4%
73.0%
78.8%
95.5%
89.7%
81.4%
94.8%
46.8%
57.6%
Construction
96.4%
85.8%
97.7%
95.6%
90.5%
96.3%
100.0%
95.0%
53.1%
58.5%
74.2%
91.8%
94.4%
88.7%
95.5%
42.1%
40.7%
Financial
87.6%
72.0%
90.4%
96.9%
76.6%
87.4%
95.0%
100.0%
32.8%
37.5%
57.1%
80.9%
95.8%
93.7%
92.3%
24.3%
24.6%
Electronics
70.8%
69.3%
57.5%
37.5%
78.5%
63.4%
53.1%
32.8%
100.0%
76.7%
80.1%
67.4%
38.6%
26.3%
48.4%
77.9%
61.8%
Food/Beverage
70.8%
84.3%
65.3%
41.4%
73.8%
73.0%
58.5%
37.5%
76.7%
100.0%
69.0%
75.3%
41.1%
29.1%
61.6%
68.4%
89.8%
Basic Metals
85.7%
76.7%
82.1%
68.4%
87.3%
78.8%
74.2%
57.1%
80.1%
69.0%
100.0%
87.0%
70.3%
61.7%
62.1%
53.1%
50.0%
Chemicals
95.9%
94.4%
95.3%
85.4%
94.3%
95.5%
91.8%
80.9%
67.4%
75.3%
87.0%
100.0%
86.2%
79.7%
85.2%
43.0%
57.5%
Transport Eqpt.
90.0%
73.7%
93.9%
99.2%
81.2%
89.7%
94.4%
95.8%
38.6%
41.1%
70.3%
86.2%
100.0%
97.0%
88.4%
20.9%
26.4%
Machinery
82.0%
65.7%
87.3%
96.3%
70.6%
81.4%
88.7%
93.7%
26.3%
29.1%
61.7%
79.7%
97.0%
100.0%
80.3%
7.2%
15.2%
Investments
91.3%
84.7%
92.2%
90.4%
85.7%
94.8%
95.5%
92.3%
48.4%
61.6%
62.1%
85.2%
88.4%
80.3%
100.0%
43.4%
49.9%
Insurance
55.5%
47.0%
44.0%
22.9%
55.1%
46.8%
42.1%
24.3%
77.9%
68.4%
53.1%
43.0%
20.9%
7.2%
43.4%
100.0%
59.8%
Medical
53.1%
71.1%
48.9%
26.9%
52.4%
57.6%
40.7%
24.6%
61.8%
89.8%
50.0%
57.5%
26.4%
15.2%
49.9%
59.8%
100.0%
-11-
UVA-F-1386
Exhibit 6
Korea First Bank
Non-Performing Loan Data
(In Billions of Korean Won)
Loan Classification
1998
1997
1996
Exchange Rate
1204
1600
841
11,663.9
21,221.4
23,268.4
Precautionary
Substandard
Doubtful
3,295.3
2,188.5
1,522.3
2,563.0
1,566.5
1,433.9
2,792.2
1,525.8
261.7
Estimated Loss
TOTAL CREDITS**
121.5
18,791.5
55.5
26,840.3
82.2
27,930.3
Bad Loans***
% of credits
1,643.8
8.7%
1,489.4
5.5%
343.9
1.2%
% of credits
Systemwide NPL as % of credits
3,832.3
20.4%
7.4%
3,055.9
11.4%
1,869.7
6.7%
Non-Performing Loans***
-12-
UVA-F- 1386
Exhibit 7
Korea First Bank
Loan Loss Reserves
(In Billions of Won)
1998
1997
1204
1600
419.5
796.8
226.8
298.4
451.4
259
30.8
1511.1
642.7
Exchange Rate
FSC guidelines stipulate that Korean commercial banks set aside a reserve
for loan losses at the end of each fiscal year. The reserve requirements
(at full coverage) are as follows:
Normal Credits: .5%
Precautionary Credits: 2%
Substandard Credits: 20%
Doubtful Credits: 75%
Estimated Loss: 100%
The minimum permissible loan loss reserve is currently set at 100%
of full coverage. This is up from 75% in 1996 and 88% in 1997.
Source: Korea First Bank Annual Reports; 1997, 1998.
-13-
UVA-F-1386
EXHIBIT 8
Korea First Bank
Comparable Company Metrics
(All non-percent figures in Billions of Korean Won)(Summit Bancorp is a United States bank of similar size. Their financials were translated to Won for comparison purposes)
Company
Hana Bank
Cho-Hung Bank
1998
1998
1998
Hanvit Bank
1997
1998
1998
Summit Bancorp
1997
20279
32726.3
60938.4
59442.4
25109.0
26629.5
36439.3
45212
By Type
Loans
60.9%
65.6%
61.0%
64.8%
58.3%
70.2%
65.3%
65.3%
Securities
28.1%
27.9%
20.5%
20.4%
20.9%
16.1%
31.1%
30.6%
Liquid Assets/other
11.0%
6.5%
18.4%
14.7%
20.8%
13.7%
3.4%
4.1%
Won currency
86.4%
58.7%
57.4%
58.9%
62.6%
59.6%
n/a
n/a
Foreign currency
13.6%
41.3%
42.6%
41.1%
37.4%
40.4%
n/a
n/a
14.4%
11.2%
11.2%
8.7%
10.6%
8.4%
7.5%
7.6%
19685.2
32891.2
60843.7
57994.7
25346.8
11855.1
28149.8
35073.8
81.4%
By Currency
By Type
Deposits
61.7%
53.1%
69.9%
64.0%
73.1%
60.0%
75.1%
Borrowings
31.0%
40.8%
22.9%
26.0%
22.4%
33.2%
24.9%
Liquid Liabilities/Other
7.3%
6.1%
7.2%
10.0%
4.5%
6.8%
Won currency
86.1%
62.4%
57.8%
50.6%
63.5%
59.5%
n/a
Foreign currency
13.9%
37.6%
42.2%
49.4%
36.5%
40.5%
n/a
n/a
11.6%
8.9%
9.5%
6.8%
10.4%
7.2%
4.3%
4.2%
Spread
2.8%
2.2%
1.7%
1.9%
0.2%
1.2%
3.2%
3.4%
929.3
135
3844.9
2939.0
51.2
70.0
3277.8
4179.9
Revenue
2911.2
5706
9679.1
7583.4
4295.4
4611.4
3040.6
3786.5
Expense
2766.9
7677
13039.5
8028.2
6984.2
6255.2
2479.8
3193.0
144.3
-1971
-3360.4
-444.8
-2688.8
-1643.8
560.8
593.5
Tier 1
7.9%
0.47%
7.92%
3.98%
-1.27%
0.57%
n/a
n/a
Tier 2
5.2%
0.46%
4.16%
3.25%
0.00%
0.57%
0.9%
18.6%
-
By Currency
Net Income
n/a
n/a
5.5%
5.4%
4.2%
20.4%
11.4%
0.7%
2.9%
2.5%
2.8%
1.3%
8.0%
2.4%
1.6%
1.6%
6966.5
6274
16633.4
12308
5662.5
4454.6
12000.0
14715.4
46.5%
36.7%
45.5%
28.0%
36.4%
34.1%
4.2%
3.4%
Exchange Rate
(Korean won to US Dollar as of year end 1998, 1997 of 1204, 1600 respectively)
Data Source: Annual Reports; Hana Bank 1999, Cho-Hung Bank 1999, Hanvit Bank 1998, Korea First Bank 1998, and Summit Bank 1998.
-14-
UVA-F-1386
EXHIBIT 9
Korea First Bank
Investment Holdings
(in billions of Korean Won)
Exchange Rate
1998
1997
1996
1204
1600
841
660.8
23.6
504.8
15.1
398.4
-
542.9
1,395.9
233.9
1,213.7
1,119.5
-
Debentures
Equity Investments
696.8
1,366.2
651.9
868.9
657.7
1,268.4
Other
293.3
4979.5
68.1
3556.4
116.9
3560.9
Onshore
Offshore
644.4
38.6
811
87.2
802.9
683
898.2
802.9
5662.5
4454.6
99.2
4264.6
36.4%
34.1%
45.2%
Foreign Currency
Valuation Allowance
TOTAL INVESTMENT HOLDINGS
% corporate exposure
(equity + debentures)
-15-
UVA-F- 1386
EXHIBIT 10
Korea First Bank
Interest Rate Sensitivity
(in billions of Korean Won, except for Foreign Currency exposure which is in US dollars)
Data as of 12/31/98
Within
3 mos
4mos - 1yr
over 1 yr
Total
BANKING ACCOUNTS
Won Currency
rate sensitive assets
rate sensitive liabilities
Gap
7,739.5
9,399.4
(1,659.9)
1,375.3
3,346.9
(1,971.6)
4,905.6
2,125.3
2,780.3
14,020.4
14,871.6
(851.2)
assets/liabilities
82.3%
41.1%
230.8%
94.3%
5,201.0
5,488.0
(287.0)
1,281.0
1,332.0
(51.0)
46.0
48.0
(2.0)
6,528.0
6,868.0
(340.0)
assets/liabilities
94.8%
96.2%
95.8%
95.0%
Foreign Currencies
TRUST ACCOUNTS**
rate sensitive assets
2,917.0
824.4
502.8
2,414.2
1,048.3
(223.9)
2,088.0
(1,358.6)
3,639.1
831.7
78.6%
34.9%
122.9%
assets/liabilities
580.2%
** Trust accounts with guaranteed principal and/or interest
729.4
4,470.8
-16-
UVA-F- 1386
EXHIBIT 11
Korea First Bank
Average Interest Generating Assets & Liabilities
(In Billion of Korean Won)
1998
Exchange Rate
Avg.
Rate
1204
1997
Avg.
Rate
1600
Avg.
1996
Rate
841
9,120.3
4,526.9
Other Assets
2,075.3
Loans
Securites
5,529.3
721.5
Other Assets
3,135.7
25,109.0
13.4%
8.7%
13.3%
11,908.3
3,293.4
676.6
10.0%
7.9%
12.2%
10,322.9
3,385.8
548.5
10.1%
8.1%
10.8%
Foreign Currencies
TOTAL ASSETS
6.7%
4.5%
11.7%
6,773.1
1,001.7
10.6%
2,976.4
26,629.5
6.6%
5.2%
7.4%
5,526.0
728.3
6.4%
6.1%
4.6%
8.4%
717.4
21,228.9
11,466.9
2,298.7
6.7%
7.4%
8.5%
LIABILITIES
Won Currency
Deposits
Debts
11,326.1
3,655.2
9.9%
9.9%
11,855.1
2,895.7
7.1%
9.0%
Other Liabilities
1,103.7
30.7%
648.1
19.8%
Deposits
Debts
7,200.0
2,016.7
9.4%
6.6%
3,668.3
5,710.7
6.2%
6.3%
2,626.8
5,201.7
5.2%
5.8%
Other Liabilities
45.1
25,346.8
10.7%
10.4%
1,115.7
25,893.6
5.0%
7.2%
21,594.1
6.3%
Foreign Currency
TOTAL LIABILITIES
-17-
UVA-F- 1386
EXHIBIT 12
Korea First Bank
Net Interest Income
(In billion of Korean Won)
Exchange Rate
1998
1997
1996
1204
1600
841
1,223.3
370.2
1,186.1
447.6
1,034.8
350.9
395.7
32.2
261.1
52.1
273.8
44.4
Call Loans
Due from banks
122.4
183.3
30.9
88.5
11.6
92.4
337.4
2,664.5
182.9
2,249.2
180.0
1,987.9
Interest Expense
Won Currency Deposits
1,125.1
842.6
762.8
679.7
360.2
228.4
259.5
135.5
170.9
133.1
152.5
362.1
127.5
302.1
76.4
190.9
2,641.5
56.8
1,876.9
40.0
1,487.7
23.0
372.3
500.2
-18-
UVA-F- 1386
EXHIBIT 13
Korea First Bank
Maturity Gap
(in billions of Korean Won, except for Foreign Currency exposure which is in US dollars)
Data as of 12/31/98
Within 3 mos.
3mos - 6mos.
6mos. - 1year
Over 1yr
Total
5,938
7,945
21,382
4,748
6,636
1,190
9,454
2,007
21,382
13,437
21,382
5,287
(539)
89.8%
1,349
(698)
89.5%
2,818
(1,509)
84.0%
11,928
100.0%
21,382
-
3,538
5,452
4,589
6,429
5,269
6,543
7,368
7,368
3,538
5,452
1,051
977
680
114
2,099
825
7,368
7,368
(1,914)
64.9%
(1,840)
71.4%
(1,274)
80.5%
100.0%
4,065
1,774
5,026
2,746
6,488
4,175
8,828
8,828
4,065
1,774
961
971
1,463
1,429
2,340
4,654
8,828
8,828
2,280
98.9%
2,314
102.3%
50.3%
BANKING ACCOUNTS
Won Currency
2,291
accumulated assets/liabilities
229.1%
** Trust accounts with guaranteed principal and/or interest
-19-
UVA-F- 1386
EXHIBIT 14
Korea First Bank
Equity Volatility
US Financials
Korea Financials
KFB
1998
25.46%
71.79%
174%
1997
18.49%
59.83%
77%
1996
13.98%
25.15%
36%
1995
10.93%
29.18%
35%
1994
11.37%
30.96%
33%
Ja
n9
M 6
ar9
M 6
ay
-9
6
Ju
l-9
Se 6
p9
No 6
v-9
Ja 6
n9
M 7
ar
-9
M 7
ay
-9
7
Ju
l-9
Se 7
p9
No 7
v-9
Ja 7
n9
M 8
ar
-9
M 8
ay
-98
Ju
l-9
Se 8
p9
No 8
v-9
8
Ja
n9
M 6
ar9
M 6
ay
-9
6
Ju
l-9
Se 6
p9
No 6
v-9
Ja 6
n-9
M 7
ar
-9
M 7
ay
-9
7
Ju
l-9
Se 7
p-9
No 7
v-9
Ja 7
n9
M 8
ar9
M 8
ay
-9
8
Ju
l-9
Se 8
p9
No 8
v-9
8
-20UVA-F- 1386
FIGURE 1
80000
70000
60000
50000
40000
30000
20000
10000
0
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
-21-
UVA-F-1386
FIGURE 2
Korea First
120
100
80
60
40
20
No
v-9
8
Ju
l-9
8
Se
p98
M
ay
-9
8
Ja
n-9
8
M
ar
-9
8
No
v-9
7
Ju
l-9
7
Se
p97
M
ay
-97
Ja
n-9
7
M
ar
-9
7
-22-
UVA-F- 1386
FIGURE 3
Chemicals
Textile/Apparel
Transports
Dec-98
Oct-98
Aug-98
Jun-98
Apr-98
Feb-98
Dec-97
Oct-97
Aug-97
Jun-97
Apr-97
Feb-97
Dec-96
Oct-96
Aug-96
Jun-96
Apr-96
Feb-96
Dec-95
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
-23-
UVA-F- 1386
FIGURE 4
140
United States
120
100
Honk Kong
80
60
40
Australia
20
Ap
r-9
6
Ju
l-9
6
Oc
t-9
6
Ja
n97
Ap
r-9
7
Ju
l-9
7
Oc
t-9
7
Ja
n98
Ap
r-9
8
Ju
l-9
8
Oc
t-9
8
Ja
n96
0
Korea
-24-
UVA-F- 1386
FIGURE 5
Japanese
Yen
Korean Won
200
150
100
Hong Kong
Dollar
Taiwan
Dollar
Thai Baht
50
Ja
n-9
6
M
ar96
M
ay
-9
6
Ju
l-9
6
Se
p-9
6
No
v-9
6
Ja
n-9
7
M
ar97
M
ay
-9
7
Ju
l-9
7
Se
p-9
7
No
v-9
7
Ja
n-9
8
M
ar98
M
ay
-9
8
Ju
l-9
8
Se
p-9
8
No
v-9
8
Malaysian
Riggit
Singapore
Dollar