Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/msea
Abstract
Study of serrated flow is important for the production of metal alloy parts with smooth surfaces and for fundamental
understanding of microscale plastic deformation. In this experimental investigation of a rolled Al /Mg alloy, serrated flow was
observed for the entire plastic flow region at three different strain rates. Strain and strain rate dependent serration amplitudes and
widths were quantified. In addition, the acoustic emission (AE) signature from the plastic flow region was analyzed in detail and was
related to the serrations in the macroscopic stress versus strain results. For all experiments, deformation bands on the surfaces of the
specimens were found to be consistent with Type B serrations. Video observations of the deformation bands were synchronized
with the AE, and the deformation bands were found to coincide with more persistent AE bursts and anomalies in the serrations.
# 2002 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Portevin-Le Chatlier; Serrated flow; 5000 series aluminum alloy; Acoustic emission
1. Introduction
Under certain circumstances, the stress /strain response during the plastic flow of Al /Mg alloys has
sharp, small-scale jumps in stress. The sharp jumps in
stress values are related to microstructural strain
localization. In this paper, inelastic deformation of this
type will be called serrated flow. In their review paper,
Robinson and Shaw [1] have identified the following
terms to be synonymous with serrated flow: the Portevin-Le Chatlier (PLC) effect, dynamic strain aging, and
jerky flow. Serrated flow has been the subject of many
investigations over the years. It is generally accepted
that clouds of solute atoms restrict dislocation motion
and are responsible for the strain rate dependency of
serrated flow [1]. In particular, solute atoms diffuse
towards dislocations that are pinned by forest obstacles.
Longer dislocation waiting times associated with lower
nominal strain rates allow for more solute diffusion. The
waiting times are therefore related to the amplitude of
J.M. Reed, M.E. Walter / Materials Science and Engineering A359 (2003) 1 /10
ture (e.g. [1,9/11]), aging (e.g. [6]), and grain size (e.g.
[10,12/14]) on serrated flow. Models have been developed to predict serration amplitude (e.g. [15,16]) and the
critical strains at which serrations start or end [2]. As has
been mentioned, serration amplitudes and critical
strains are dependent on the length of time that
dislocations are mobile or immobile, and therefore
models typically use empirical relations to account for
diffusion and dislocation motion. Other models, which
have incorporated evolution equations for dislocation
densities, indicate that the PLC effect is chaotic in
nature (e.g. [17]). The incorporation of a time delay in
the evolution equations has enabled prediction of
several experimentally observed results [18]. To prove
that PLC stress oscillations are chaotic in nature, auto
correlations, singular value decompositions, and Lyapunov spectrum analyses have been performed on
experimental data [19].
In general, researchers have relied on qualitative
descriptions to classify serrations as Type A, B, C, D,
or E (e.g. [1]). Different serration types result from
differences in microstructural strain localization and can
be identified from macroscopic stress /strain curves.
Ambiguities arise from the fact that different types of
serrations can overlap and cancel each other [7]. More
recently, a laser scanning extensometer was used to
measure local strains along the whole specimen gage
length [20], and serration types were identified based on
deformation band propagation. Continuous propagation of a single band yields Type A serrations; discontinuous band propagation results in Type B
serrations; and nucleation of single bands at random
locations yields Type C serrations. The reader is referred
to existing literature for detailed descriptions of serration types (e.g. [1,7,20]).
Acoustic emission (AE) results from transient elastic
waves and can be monitored by piezo transducers
coupled to the specimen surface. It has been shown
that dislocation generation, multiplication, and motion
produce AE (e.g. [21,22]). Thus, there have been
numerous attempts to use AE to investigate serrated
flow [16,23 /27]. Unfortunately, the qualitative nature of
AE, the sensor type, sensor placement, surface coupling,
signal thresholding, and data presentation has led to a
perceived and/or actual lack of uniformity in results.
Some investigators have found that AE results only
from Type A serrations [26]; others show AE at every
serration peak [23]; and still other investigators indicate
that AE only occurs during deformation band initiation
and not during propagation [25]. Nonetheless, AE
provides a method for obtaining dislocation scale
information during serrated flow.
Much of the previous work on serrated flow has
focused on the effects of test conditions and material
composition and microstructure. In this work, the
serration characteristics are investigated for the entire
2. Experiments
The 5083 aluminum alloy (4.45% magnesium, 0.65%
Manganese, 0.15% Chromium) used in this work was
obtained from Pechiney Rolled Products in Ravenswood, West Virginia. The material had been rolled into
1 mm thick sheet that was then punch cut into a dogbone shape. With CNC machining, gage sections were
machined to 6.9 cm long by 6.35 mm wide and grip-pin
holes were bored. Specimen surfaces were smoothed by
hand with 1000 grit sandpaper. Specimens were tested to
failure in uniaxial tension at room temperature using a
large Instron screw machine. Load measurements were
obtained using an Instron 1000 lb type D load cell, and
displacement was measured using a Schaevitz LVDT
mounted on the grip. The LVDT had a 19 mm range
and 2.3 mm mV 1 resolution. The displacement information from the LVDT was used to determine the
average strain in the specimen. Since the LVDT was
mounted on the grip, machine compliances were insignificant in the plastic region. All experiments were
displacement controlled at strain rates of 6.3 /105
s 1 (slow), 3.8 /104 s 1 (medium), or 1.0 /103 s 1
(fast). All strains reported in this work are nominal
strains and therefore are directly proportional to time.
A Vallen-Systeme AMSY4 AE workstation was used
for all data acquisition. Two parametric input channels
continuously recorded load and displacement signals at
5, 30, and 75 Hz for the slow, medium, and fast strain
rates, respectively. Two acoustic channels were used to
collect AE through a Deci SE150-M acoustic sensor
with a Vallen-Systeme AEP3 preamplifier. Acoustic
event, or hit recording is initiated when the transducer
signal exceeds a preset threshold, and acquisition can
run at up to 8000 hits per second. Each hit has an
associated amplitude, rise time, energy, counts (number
of threshold crossings), and duration. For each acoustic
hit recorded, additional readings from the parametric
load and displacement channels were also recorded. The
sensors were placed at opposite ends of the specimen just
outside of the gage length. They were coupled to the
specimen surface with honey and held in place with
rubber bands. Because the sensors are just outside the
deforming section of the specimen, the use of rubber
bands for holding sensors in place does not lead to
relative motion between the sensor and the specimen.
Past experience with couplants has indicated that honey
responds to lead pencil breaks in the same manner as
J.M. Reed, M.E. Walter / Materials Science and Engineering A359 (2003) 1 /10
Fig. 1. (a) A macroscopic stress /strain response for a strain rate of 6.3 /10 5 s 1; (b) A re-scaled early yield; and (c) A re-scaled late yield region.
J.M. Reed, M.E. Walter / Materials Science and Engineering A359 (2003) 1 /10
Fig. 2. Serrations for (a) slw; (b) medium; and (c) fast strain rates. All
figures have the same stress and strain range, and local maxima and
minima are indicated. Within (a) the width and amplitude of a
serration are indicated as Ds and Do , respectively.
J.M. Reed, M.E. Walter / Materials Science and Engineering A359 (2003) 1 /10
Fig. 3. Serration amplitudes from two repeat experiments at each strain rate, as shown by o and x symbols.
Fig. 4. Serration widths from two repeat experiments at each strain rate, as shown by solid and dashed lines.
J.M. Reed, M.E. Walter / Materials Science and Engineering A359 (2003) 1 /10
Fig. 5. AE hits corresponding to serrated flow for strain rate of 3.8/10 4 s 1.
(1)
J.M. Reed, M.E. Walter / Materials Science and Engineering A359 (2003) 1 /10
Fig. 6. A serrated flow anomaly for (a) slow; (b) medium; and (c) fast
strain rates.
J.M. Reed, M.E. Walter / Materials Science and Engineering A359 (2003) 1 /10
Fig. 7. For the plastic strain range, a slow rate stress /strain curve together with normalized, cumulative AE for the three different strain rates.
4. Summary
The material under investigation exhibited serrated
flow for the duration of plastic deformation at each of
three chosen experimental strain rates. Serrations were
quantitatively characterized during deformation after
the Luders region and before necking and were determined to be Type B serrations. Serration amplitudes
increased with increasing strain and decreased with
increasing strain rate. The percent increase in amplitude
was nearly constant for each strain rate. AE from
serrations was also analyzed. Low energy AEs were
associated with isolated serration peaks, and higher
energy AEs were associated with anomalies in the
serrated flow curves. Through synchronized video, these
anomalies in the macroscopic serrated flow curves and
J.M. Reed, M.E. Walter / Materials Science and Engineering A359 (2003) 1 /10
Fig. 8. Two examples (a, b) of AE, anomalies, and band propagation at a strain rate of 3.8/10 4 s 1.
Acknowledgements
The funds for the acoustic emission equipment were
provided by National Science Foundation grant No.
CMS-9872606 managed by Dr Jorn Larsen-Basse. Mr J.
Reed has been supported with National Science Foundation funds and in particular, through National
References
[1] J.M. Robinson, M.P. Shaw, Int. Mater. Rev. 39 (1994) 113.
[2] L.P. Kubin, Y. Estrin, Acta Metall. 38 (1990) 697.
[3] K. Chihab, Y. Estrin, L.P. Kubin, J. Vergnol, Scripta Metall. 21
(1987) 203.
10
J.M. Reed, M.E. Walter / Materials Science and Engineering A359 (2003) 1 /10