Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
, m
>
@:fv
jjjjjjjE
jjjjt
j~
E!i
.j
- -:-.
II
r...
Objective
This study determined the association between proximal gastrointestinal (GI) colonization and the
development of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infection and multiple organ failure (MOF) in
a population of critically ill surgical patients.
Methods
A prospective cohort study of 41 surgical ICU patients was undertaken. Specimens of gastric
and upper small bowel fluid were obtained for quantitative culture; the severity of organ
dysfunction was quantitated by a numeric score.
Results
One or more episodes of ICU-acquired infection developed in 33 patients and involved at least
one organism concomitantly cultured from the upper GI tract in all but 3. The most common
organisms causing ICU-acquired infection-Candida, Streptococcus faecalis, Pseudomonas,
and coagulase-negative Staphylococci-were also the most common species colonizing the
proximal GI tract. Gut colonization correlated with the development of invasive infection within 1
week of culture for Pseudomonas (90% vs. 13% in noncolonized patients, p < 0.0001) or
Staphylococcus epidermidis (80% vs. 6%, p < 0.0001); a weaker association was seen for
colonization with Candida. Infections associated with GI colonization included pneumonia (16
patients), wound infection (12 patients), urinary tract infection (11 patients), recurrent (tertiary)
peritonitis (1 1 patients), and bacteremia (10 patients). ICU mortality was greater for patients
colonized with Pseudomonas (70% vs. 26%, p = 0.03); organ dysfunction was most marked in
patients colonized with one or more of the following: Candida, Pseudomonas, or S. epidermidis.
Conclusions
The upper GI tract is an important reservoir of the organisms causing ICU-acquired infection.
Pathologic GI colonization is associated with the development of MOF in the critically ill surgical
patient.
111
112
ICU,`
METHODS
Study Subjects
Forty-one patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive
Care Unit of the Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal,
Quebec, Canada, were studied. All patients had pre-existing access to the upper GI tract through one or more
indwelling nasogastric or nasoenteral tubes, or a surgical
gastrostomy or jejunostomy, and were considered on
clinical grounds to be at high risk for the development of
ICU-acquired infections. The protocol was approved by
the Human Ethics Committee ofthe Royal Victoria Hospital, and informed consent was obtained from the patient or a relative.
Definitions
Infection was diagnosed according to microbiologic
and radiographic criteria as described previously.9 The
diagnosis of pneumonia required the presence of a heavy
growth of an organism in two consecutive sputum specimens, in conjunction with purulent sputum and a chest
roentgenogram revealing a new or changing pulmonary
infiltrate. Urinary tract infection was defined as the presence of an organism at a concentration of greater than
105 colony-forming units (CFU) per milliliter of urine.
Bacteremia was said to be present when an organism was
isolated from a single blood culture specimen, or in the
case of S. epidermidis, from two simultaneous specimens or a single specimen and an intravenous catheter
tip. The diagnosis of wound infection required the demonstration of organisms from a wound that drained pus,
or the persistent presence of organisms in an open
wound that failed to show formation of granulation tissue. The diagnosis of recurrent (tertiary) peritonitis was
based on the isolation of an organism from a specimen of
peritoneal fluid obtained at surgical laparotomy, zipper
laparostomy, or percutaneous catheter drainage.
Infections that were present at the time of ICU admission or that developed subsequently as a direct consequence of a surgical procedure were termed primary infections. An infection was considered to be ICU-acquired if it developed at least 48 hours after ICU
admission and involved either a different anatomic site
or micro-organisms different from those cultured from a
primary infection.
113
MOF Scores
Statistics
Results are presented as the mean standard deviation. The Student's t test and one-way analysis of variance were used to compare means of normally distributed continuous data. Group frequencies were compared using the chi square statistic with Yates'
continuity correction, or the Fisher exact test. Results
were considered to be significant for values of p < 0.05.
RESULTS
Demographic Data
ICU-acquired
Median length of stay
MOF score ( SD)
ICU mortality
41
64.5 12.8 yr
21
20
18.4 7.3
18/41 (44%)
33/41 (81%)
23 days (range, 1-219 days)
7.8 4.6
15/41 (36%)
ICU-Acquired Infection
ICU-acquired infection was a common complication,
developing during more than 80% of ICU admissions.
114
Peritonitis
12
Empyema
2
Bacteremia
19
...
Log10
No. of
Patients Colonized (CFU/mL SD)
Organism
Candida
Streptococcus faecalis
Pseudomonas
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Non group D Streptococci
Escherichia coli
Enterobacter
Serratia
Klebsiella
Staphylococcus aureus
Citrobacter
Bacteroides
4.3 1.6
6.8 0.8
6.9 1.1
5.7 1.6
6.9 1.2
6.2 1.6
6.7 1.4
6.5 0.8
5.6 1.7
5.6 2.0
6.2 1.1
7.0 0.9
19
12
10
10
7
7
5
5
5
5
4
3
7.1
0
4.7
7.0
6.1
*000
0*
000*
*0
7
6
pH 5
Pneumonia
22
x.'..'-...'.'~............
......Wound
17
Urinary Tract
22
Figure 2. Sites of ICU-acquired infection in the 34 patients who had at
least one episode of ICU-acquired infection. Numbers refer to the number
of patients having at least one episode of infection at the site indicated.
0
.
*0
pm>
;.
l
.
Organism
-I
Candida
Figure 1. The pH of upper GI fluid specimens that yielded Pseudomonas
was consistently above 4.0, while Candida could be grown from specimens with a pH as low as 1. Mean pH values of specimens growing
Candida are significantly lower than those growing Pseudomonas (p <
Pseudomonas
0.001).
-148 U
.
S. epidermidis
Enterococcus
Candida
Streptococcus faecalis
Staphylococcus epidermidis
Pseudomonas
Escherichia coli
Staphylococcus aureus
Enterobacter
Klebsiella, Serratia
ej Se
. ........................~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
=
...........
No. of Patients
24
22
20
16
15
12
10
7 each
Wound Infection
Organism
GI Colonization
No GI
Colonization
Pt
Pseudomonas
Staphylococcus
epidermidis
Candida
Streptococcus faecalis
9/10 (90%)
4/31 (13%)
<0.0001
8/10 (80%)
11/19 (58%)
7/12 (58%)
2/31 (6%)
8/22 (36%)
8/29 (28%)
<0.0001
NS
NS
Twelve patients had wound infections with an organism present in the upper GI tract; 7 patients ultimately
died. The infecting organisms included Candida (five patients), S. epidermidis (four patients), Pseudomonas
(four patients), S. faecalis (four patients), and Serratia
(two patients).
Urinary Tract Infection
Eleven patients had
one or more
episodes of urinary
patient each.
infection at least 72 hours after apparently adequate therapy for an episode of primary or secondary peritonitis)
occurred in 11 patients, 8 of whom died. Four of these
patients had direct communication between the upper
GI tract and the peritoneal cavity as a result of either a
perforation (two patients) or an anastomotic leak (two
patients); in the remaining seven, the upper GI tract was
anatomically intact. The infecting species were S. faecalis (five patients), Pseudomonas (five patients), S. epidermidis (four patients), and Candida (two patients).
..
Site
Pneumonia
Wound
Urinary tract
Tertiary peritonitis
Bacteremia
Empyema
:: :: ..:.
::..
~~~~~~~~~
~~~~
~_....
No. of Patients
Infected
22
17
22
12
19
2
16 (73%)
12 (71%)
11 (50%)
Experiencing Infection
11 (92%)
10 (53%)
1 (50%)
116
Bacteremia
Bacteremia or fungemia, the sine quia non of invasive
infection, occurred with an organism from the upper GI
tract in ten patients (Table 5). Pseudornonas was isolated
in four patients, Candida in three, and S. epidermnidis, E.
coli, and S. facca/is in one.
A 30-year-old man sustained multiple injuries including a pelvic fracture in a fall. Gastric cultures performed 3
The same
days later yielded a heavy growth of S.
organism was isolated from the blood 4 days later, and at
the same time in insignificant numbers in the urine.
'/iwcalis.
14-1
120
10-
Co
8-
T T T T
*
IL
6-
4.
2-
S. epidermidis
Candida
Pseudomonas
S. fecalis
Others
Colonizing Microorganism
Figure 3. Organ failure (MOF) scores for patients colonized with Candida (19 patients), Pseudomonas (10 patients), S. epidermidis (10 patients), or S. faecalis (12 patients) were significantly higher than the scores
for the 7 patients who were not colonized with any of these 4 organisms (p
0.02, one-way analysis of variance). MOF scores were calculated as
previously described.9 Results are mean SD.
Empyema
tained 13 days after injury grew S. epidermidis: S. epidermidIs and S. tiecalis were cultured from the chest tube
drainage 3 days later.
DISCUSSION
In health, the stomach and proximal GI tract are sterile, or sparsely populated with a relatively avirulent flora
including Lactobaci/li and Strepto()co((i.21'22 As this and
previous studiesi4-7 demonstrate, critical illness is associated with significant proximal gut overgrowth with typical ICU pathogens. Both descriptive and interventional
studies suggest that this pathologic colonization contributes significantly to the development of ICU-acquired
infection.
In the current study, more than 90% of the 33 patients
with ICU-acquired infection had at least one episode of
infection with an organism that was simultaneously present in the upper GI tract. Moreover, colonization with
either Pseuidomonas or S. epidermnidis was strongly associated with concomitant infection, while colonization
with C'andida was significantly associated with invasive
fungal infection at some time during the ICU admission.
A purely descriptive study such as this cannot establish causality. It can be argued that gut colonization is a
consequence of infection and a manifestation of microbial dissemination from the initial focus of infection;
however, this interpretation appears less tenable. Despite
the fact that GI cultures were performed at disparate and
arbitrary timepoints while diagnostic cultures were performed regularly on the basis of clinical evidence of infection, gut colonization equally preceded, coincided
with, and followed the development of invasive infec-
118
17.
18.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. Ruth Horn for supervising the microbial cultures and specimen identification, Ms. Betty Giannias for performing
the quantitative bacterial cultures, Lise Laporte, RN, and Mary de
Santis, RN, for collecting clinical data, and Ms. Elaine Caon for assisting with the preparation of the manuscript.
20.
21.
22.
References
1. Daschner FD, Frey P, Wolff G, et al. Nosocomial infections in
intensive care wards: a multicenter prospective study. Intensive
Care Med 1982; 8:5-9.
2. Chandrasekar PH, Kruse JA, Mathews MF. Nosocomial infection
among patients in different types of intensive care units at a city
hospital. Crit Care Med 1986; 14:508-5 10.
3. Craven DE, Kunches LM, Lichtenberg DA, et al. Nosocomial infection and fatality in medical and surgical intensive care unit patients. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148:1161-1168.
4. Marshall JC, Sweeney D. Microbial infection and the septic response in critical surgical illness: sepsis, not infection, determines
outcome. Arch
19.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
1426.
32. McLoughlin GA, Hede JE, Temple JG, et al. The role of IgA in the
prevention of bacterial colonization of the jejunum in the vagotomized subject. Br J Surg 1978; 65:435-437.
33. Eisenhauer PB, Harwig SSL, Lehrer RI. Cryptdins: antimicrobial
defensins of the murine small intestine. Infect Immun 1992;
60:3556-3565.
34. Shah PC, Freier S, Park BH, et al. Pancreozymin and secretin
enhance duodenal fluid antibody levels to cow's milk proteins.
Gastroenterology 1982; 83:881-888.
35. van der Waaij D, Berghuis-de Vries JM, Lekkerkerk-van der Wees
JEC. Colonization resistance of the digestive tract in conventional
and antibiotic-treated mice. J Hyg 1971; 69:405-411.
36. deMaria A, Buckley H, Lichtenberg F. Gastrointestinal candidiasis
in rats treated with antibiotics, cortisone, and azathioprine. Infect
Immun 1976; 13:1761-1770.
37. Hentges DJ, Stein AJ, Casey SW, Que JU. Protective role of intestinal flora against infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in mice:
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.