0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
33 vues1 page
The document summarizes concerns about Oxford City Council's proposed Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) on rough sleeping. Specifically:
1) The PSPO is aimed at improving the appearance of the city center rather than helping rough sleepers.
2) Implementing the PSPO only in the city center implies the main concern is appearance, not helping those sleeping rough.
3) Violating a PSPO is a criminal offense subject to a £100 fine, which would criminalize rough sleepers and likely make their situation worse by hindering opportunities.
4) Banning specific rough sleepers from the city center against their will could force them to less safe areas and risks their welfare.
The document summarizes concerns about Oxford City Council's proposed Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) on rough sleeping. Specifically:
1) The PSPO is aimed at improving the appearance of the city center rather than helping rough sleepers.
2) Implementing the PSPO only in the city center implies the main concern is appearance, not helping those sleeping rough.
3) Violating a PSPO is a criminal offense subject to a £100 fine, which would criminalize rough sleepers and likely make their situation worse by hindering opportunities.
4) Banning specific rough sleepers from the city center against their will could force them to less safe areas and risks their welfare.
The document summarizes concerns about Oxford City Council's proposed Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) on rough sleeping. Specifically:
1) The PSPO is aimed at improving the appearance of the city center rather than helping rough sleepers.
2) Implementing the PSPO only in the city center implies the main concern is appearance, not helping those sleeping rough.
3) Violating a PSPO is a criminal offense subject to a £100 fine, which would criminalize rough sleepers and likely make their situation worse by hindering opportunities.
4) Banning specific rough sleepers from the city center against their will could force them to less safe areas and risks their welfare.
Response to Oxford City Councils statement of April 9th the proposed implementation of a Public Spaces
Protection Order (PSPO) on rough sleeping
As we state in our petition, we recognise Oxford City Councils efforts, so far, to support people who are homeless; however, we remain concerned about this particular policy for the following reasons: 1) PSPO legislation states that PSPOs may only be implemented against behaviour that has a detrimental effect on the quality of life of local residents. Oxford City Council states that it wishes to introduce a PSPO on street sleeping as this spoils the experience of the city centre. This makes it clear that this measure is not being proposed in order to help those who are sleeping rough, but in order to make Oxford look more attractive. 2) If Oxford City Council truly think that this measure will help those who are sleeping rough, then why are they only implementing it in the city centre? This implies that the appearance of central Oxford is still the key concern, and that they have no problem with people continuing to sleep rough out of sight. 3) The Council states that the PSPO would not criminalise rough sleeping. However, violation of a PSPO is a criminal offence, which is subject to a fine of 100. Therefore it seems that this measure would indeed criminalise a rough sleeper who disobeyed it. It is highly likely that imposing a fine of 100 on rough sleepers will make their situation worse rather than better. Moreover, having a criminal record would further hinder a rough sleeper from finding paths out of homelessness, as it will hinder them from obtaining a job, opening a bank account, etc. 4) The Council has stated that the powers would only be A Big Issue vendor on Broad Street, who used on entrenched rough sleepers who have refused has been sober for two years, talks about accommodation. We still believe that it would be wrong why he doesnt accept hostel to implement a PSPO on this very specific group. People accommodation: who are sleeping rough are people. They should have the autonomy to choose whether they want to be in a hostel [The residents] stand there drinking all or not. It is difficult to imagine that any other group of day long, and they try and get you out of people would have their right to decide about matters your room to drink with them, to make you such as these taken away from them. There are often fail, to make you go backwards. They dont understandable reasons why people who are sleeping like to see people succeed. rough do not take up offers of accommodation, such as: fear, worry about contact with users of alcohol or drugs, Source: Raphael Hogarth or mental health problems. We remain concerned that banning these people from the centre of town will force them to sleep in places where they are less safe rather than more. As comments on our petition have shown, the welfare of Oxfords rough sleepers is at risk if they are pushed out of the city centre. 5) Oxford City Council has been unclear about how they would guarantee that the PSPO would only be used on the specific group of entrenched rough sleepers who have been offered accommodation. We are concerned that there would be little protection to stop the measure being used more widely against anyone who is sleeping rough, especially as the idea of a PSPO is to improve the experience of the centre of the city. If Oxford City Council has the time and resources to do this, we would ask that they find a more compassionate solution to helping individual rough sleepers. 6) We feel that this policy does not treat people who are rough sleeping as people, but treats them as a nuisance to be solved it is a sticking plaster solution. Furthermore, this policy adds to the huge stigma that people who are sleeping rough already face. We would also like to take this opportunity to call for greater transparency on the part of Oxford City Council about how this policy would play out in practice. At the moment, the Council seem to be releasing details gradually as the protest support increases, but the proposals remain vague. We are looking out for the rights of rough sleepers and the public deserves full knowledge of what this would really entail. Oxford City Councils statement is available here.