Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Article information:
To cite this document:
Zakaria Ali Aribi Simon Gao, (2010),"Corporate social responsibility disclosure", Journal of Financial
Reporting and Accounting, Vol. 8 Iss 2 pp. 72 - 91
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/19852511011088352
Downloaded on: 13 March 2015, At: 20:46 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 55 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 3739 times since 2010*
Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by 516270 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for
Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines
are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at
www.emeraldinsight.com/1985-2517.htm
JFRA
8,2
72
Simon Gao
Edinburgh Napier Business School, Edinburgh Napier University,
Edinburgh, UK
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of Islam on corporate social
responsibility disclosure (CSRD) in Islamic financial institutions (IFIs).
Design/methodology/approach Using the content analysis approach, the paper examines the
influences of Islam on CSRD by looking into the annual reports of 21 conventional financial
institutions (CFIs) and 21 IFIs operating in the Gulf region.
Findings The results show significant differences in the level and the extent of the disclosure
between IFIs and CFIs, largely due to the disclosure made by IFIs of religions related themes and
information, including Sharia supervisory board reports, the Zakah and charity donation, and free
interest loan.
Originality/value This papers contribution to the literature is twofold: the paper reveals the
actual difference of CSRD between IFIs and non-IFIs, by comparing the disclosures made by IFIs and
non-IFIs; and the paper identifies the extent of influence of Islam upon the CSRD of IFIs.
Keywords Corporate social responsibility, Disclosure, Islam, Financial institutions
Paper type Research paper
1. Introduction
Corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) is the provision of financial and
non-financial information relating to an organisations interaction with its physical and
social environment (Guthrie and Mathews, 1985). It is the process of communicating the
social and environmental effects of an organisations economic action to particular
interest grouping within society and to the society at large (Gray et al., 1987, p. 9). CSRD
has played a significant role in business, through enhancing corporate transparency,
developing corporate image and providing useful information for investment decision
making (Gray et al., 1988; Patten, 1990; Owen et al., 1997; ODwyer and Gray, 1998;
Alnajjar, 2000; Friedman and Miles, 2001; Deegan and Blomquist, 2006).
Over the past decades, CSRD became an expanding area of accounting research.
A number of theories, including agency theory, stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory,
political economy theory, accountability theory and institutional theory have been
employed to justify why companies disclose or not disclose corporate social responsibility
(CSR) information (Guthrie and Parker, 1989; Ness and Mirza, 1991; Gray et al., 1995a, b;
Deegan and Gordon, 1996; Deegan and Rankin, 1996; Adams and Harte, 1998; Ince, 1998;
Deegan, 2002; Deegan and Blomquist, 2006). However, the above theories were very much
developed in the context of western market economies, and, therefore, their applicability
in other parts of the world is questionable, in particular in Islamic societies where
businesses operate in a totally different cultural context along with different business
objectives and ethics.
While the application of theories that were developed in a particular political,
economic and culture environment to justify disclosure practice in other different
environment is arguable (Hofstede, 1983; Perera, 1989), there has been little attempt to
explain CSRD from the cultural and religious perspectives. The existing theoretical
frameworks concerning CSRD rarely recognise religion as a foundation in explaining
why organisations disclose social information and also in making assessment of
organisations performance in terms of fulfilling their obligation to God, society and
eco-system (Haniffa and Cooke, 2001).
The aim of this paper is to presume Islam as a key factor inspiring CSRD of IFIs and
differentiating corporate behaviours between Islamic financial institutions (IFIs) and
conventional financial institutions (CFIs) in disclosing CSR information. The paper is
organised as follows: Section 2 explains Islamic values with a view to justifying the
need for this study. Section 3 reviews some prior studies. Section 4 describes research
methods and samples. The results and discussion are presented in Section 5. Section 6
concludes the paper and highlights the limitation.
2. Islamic values
Unlike in the western value-free society where religion is considered as a private matter
(Rice, 1999), in many parts of the Muslim world, Islam is integrated in all aspects of
society including politics, community, law and economy. The influence of Islam on
peoples daily activities and businesses is well-documented in the Holy Quran and
Sunah[1]. Islam is not merely a personal religion, but also an organisation for society and
its institutions, as well as the guide for conduct of individuals within that institutional
and social context (Tinker, 2004). Many of Islamic business values are part of core CSR
activities. As shown in Table I, for example, the primary sources of social responsibility
and business ethics in Islam are predominately based on the Holy Quran and Sunah.
Socio-economic justice is an essential element of Islam. This is because the objective
of Islam is to build a fair society, which was clearly stated in the Holy Quran. We send
our Messengers with clear signs and sent down with them the Book and the Balance
(Right and Wrong), that men may stand forth in justice (The Holy Quran S57:25). Islam
aims at the formation of a socio-economic order based on justice and considers economic
activities as a means to an end and not an end in itself (Ebrahim and Joo, 2001).
According to Al-Gazzali, one of the famous scholars in the eleventh century, the purpose
of Sharia is to promote the welfare of the people, which lies in safeguarding their faith,
their life, their intellect, their prosperity and their wealth (cited in Kamla (2005, p. 112).
Social responsibility in the Islamic context is based on the Islamic concept of human
well being and good life, which stresses brotherhood/sisterhood and socio-economic
justice and requires a balanced satisfaction of both the material and spiritual needs of all
humans (Chapra, 1992). The concept of Khilafah (Vicegerency) defines a persons
responsibility to the community and a persons responsibility to himself or herself.
According to Chapra (1992), the implication emanating from the concept of Khilafah is
that an individual is regarded as a trustee for Gods resources. This has a different
CSR disclosure
73
The Holy Prophet said I will be foe to three persons on the day of
judgment, one of them being the one who, when he employs a person
that has accomplished his duty, does not give him his due (Al
Bukhari, No. 2109)
No Arab has superiority over a non-Arab and no non-Arab has any
superiority over an Arab; no dark person has superiority over a white
person and no white person has superiority over a dark person. The
criterion of honour in the sight of God is righteousness and honest
living (saying of prophet Muhammad) (Sallam and Hanafy, 1988)
God likes that when someone does any thing, it must be done perfectly
well (saying of the prophet Muhammad-pray and peace upon him)
(Sallam and Hanafy, 1988)
God does command you to render back your trusts to those to whom
they are due (Quran 4:54)
Give just measure and weight, nor withhold from the people the
things that are their due[. . .] (Quran 11:85)
He who cheats is not one of us (saying of the Prophet Mohamed-pray
and peace upon him) (Keller, 1994)
[. . .] do not outbid one another in order to raise the price, fairness in
contract negotiation [. . .] dont enter into a transaction when other
have already entered into that transaction and be as brothers one to
another (saying of prophet Mohamed-pray and peace upon him)
The acquisition of knowledge is a duty incumbent on every Muslim,
male and female (saying of the prophet Muhammad-pray and peace
upon him) (Sallam and Hanafy, 1988)
Table I.
Some examples of
business ethics principle
in Islam
Related business practice
74
Ethical principle
JFRA
8,2
Islam concerns about safeguarding of natural resources. About 1,427 years ago, the
Holy Quran warned against the negativity of spoiling the environment: Mischief has
appeared on land and sea because of (themed) that the hand of men have earned
(The Holy Quran S30:41). Islam advocates the mankind to take care everything created
by Almighty Allah, as it is part of submission to Allah. In relation to the environmental
responsibility in Islam, the Holy Quran underlines the importance of protecting the
environment. The Quran says do not spread mischief on the earth, after it has been set
in order, and invoke Him with fear and hope; Surely, Allahs Mercy is (ever) near unto the
good-doers (The Holy Quran, S7:56). In Islam, the mankind has been entrusted with
the responsibility of protecting the earth. This trusteeship is seen as onerous and no
other creature would accept it. Allah says: We offered the trust unto the heavens and the
earth and the hills, but they shrank from bearing it and were afraid of it and man
assumed it (The Holy Quran, S33:72). This concept of trusteeship in Islam, similar to
the notion of sustainable development, does not regard natural resources as a free good
to be wasted at the free well of any nation (Rice, 1999). No one has the authority to waste
or corrupt the resources. Eat and drink, but waste not by excess; Verily He loves not the
excessive (The Holy Quran:S7:31).
Indeed, Islam offers great advantage for environmental conservation, protection
and sustainable development in that it is a source for law that is consistent with
cultural values of Islamic Society and can be imported with ease into environmental
policy that is both effective and implement-able (Bagader et al., 1994, p. viii). There are
hundreds of verses in the Holy Quran concerning environmental issues. Sharia sets up
CSR disclosure
75
JFRA
8,2
76
the standards of human conduct and how businesses should deal with their external
environment.
Muslims are expected to conduct their business activities in accordance with the
requirement of Sharia. Since the foundation of IFIs is based on Islamic values, they are
considered having ethical identity and have unique social and economic objectives
(Haniffa and Hudaib, 2007). IFIs are guided by an Islamic economic worldview, which
is based on the principle of social justice and the well being of society (Dusuki and Dar,
2005). Llias (2008, p. 1) outlines major differences between IFIs and CFIs. IFIs operate
on the basis of banning interest (riba) and uncertainty, sharing risk and profits,
encouraging ethical investments that enhance society and asset-banking. It requires
each a financial transaction must be tied to a tangible, identifiable underlying asset.
Under Sharia, money does not belong to the asset category as it is intangible and thus
should not earn a return.
Businesses that follow Islam principles have to incorporate Sharia fully into their
business practice and objectives, leading to corporate behaviours that are different
from the ones in the western market economy where profits maximisation including
profits from interest on loans is the legitimate aim of business. In the context of Islam
business world, businesses have to demonstrate their accountability to God and
fulfillment of social objectives. This demonstration is expected to be reflected in the
annual reports published to the public.
3. Prior research
A number of studies have investigated the CSRD of companies conducting their
business according to Islam (Anuar et al., 2004; Yahya et al., 2005; Haniffa and Hudaib,
2007). For instance, using content analysis, Anuar et al. (2004) provide evidence that
supports the contention that Islam has an effect on corporate environmental reporting.
They compare the environmental practice of Sharia-approved companies, which are
conducting their activities in strict accordance to Islamic principles with the
environmental practice of non-Sharia-approved companies that operate in Malaysia,
and show that the former has a higher level of environmental reporting compared to
non-Sharia companies. They suggest that the higher extent of environmental reporting
among Sharia-approved companies may reflect an attempt by such companies to
present corporate reporting which embodies the Islamic principles of full disclosure and
environmental accountability. While adopting a comparative approach, their study was
very much limited to environmental reporting.
Haniffa and Hudaib (2007) conduct a longitudinal survey study of the annual
reports of seven IFIs in four Arabian Gulf region countries. Using content analysis
to examine the effectiveness of Islamic banks communicating of their ethical identity,
they investigate the discrepancy between the communicated information (based
on information disclosed in the annual reports) and ideal disclosure (i.e. disclosure of
information deemed vital based on the Islamic ethical business framework). While it
expects that IFIs must comply with the precepts of Sharia Islamiah in their reporting,
their findings indicate fall far short of what would be enabling ethical and social
communication in IFIs, and the reports vary across the 3-year period, suggesting that
the communication by IFIs is very much minimal. They believe this was mainly due to
a lack of pressure from stakeholders and also the prevailing secretive culture in the
region (p. 111).
CSR disclosure
77
JFRA
8,2
78
Gray et al., 1995a; Kamla, 2005; Maali et al., 2006; Haniffa and Hudaib, 2007). Some of
our themes in the checklist are formally required by the AAOIFI[5]. As AAOIFI
standards are not mandated in all the sample countries and most IFIs in the sample
operate in more than two countries including countries where AAOIFI was not
mandated, the annual report produced by these institutions does not have a clear cut
between mandatory and voluntary elements. Moreover, distinguishing between
voluntary and mandatory disclosure is beyond the scope of this study as our purpose is
to investigate the extent of CSR disclosures with a view to identifying the influence
of Islam. So this study does not differentiate mandatory and voluntary disclosures.
In order to enrich the content analysis data and to provide a detailed in-depth analysis,
an effort was made to capture the quality and type of disclosure.
Consistent with prior studies (Guthrie and Mathews, 1985; Gray et al., 1995b; Zeghal
and Ahmed, 1990), the themes were further analysed under three categories of evidence
(i.e. monetary, qualitative and quantitative) and type of news (i.e. good, neutral and bad)
(Appendix, Table AII).
Reliability and validity in content analysis refer to a measuring procedure, which
ensures to provide the same results on repeated trails. In other word, reliability
and validity are determined to ensure that different researchers will code the text in the
same way and therefore diminish the chance for inaccuracy and biases. A number of
steps were taking to ensure reliability:
(1) Well specified coding instruments, with well-specified decision rules (Appendix,
Tables AI and AII) have been developed to minimise discrepancies and fulfill
objectivity.
(2) One of the researchers, main coder, has undergone an extensive period of
training prior to starting the process of analysing in order to have a better
understanding of the subject.
(3) To ensure reproducibility, three annual reports were tested by different coders
in a pilot test. Ambiguities were discussed with the authors, who endeavour to
ensure that all coders used the same coding rules; and any points made were
used to develop the framework of analysis.
(4) Each step in the research process must be fulfilled on the basis of explicitly
formulated rules and procedures. Moreover, any definitions used in the data
gathering must be negotiated to realise these shared meanings which recreate
the same referents in all the associated investigators (Gray et al., 1995b, p. 80).
(5) In order to ascertain stability in the measurement procedure, a few annual
reports, which were analysed by the researchers, were those which were
analysed during the pilot test. The result was almost stabilised. This procedure
was undertaken in order to ascertain if the initial categories identified and their
measurement have remained stable at different times (stability).
For the examination of the internal consistency of CSRD, Cronbach coefficient was used.
Cronbach coefficient a, is a measure of internal consistency that uses repeated
measurement to assess the degree to which correlation among the measurements is
attenuated to random error (Botosan, 1997). For the seven categories, Cronbach
coefficient a is 0.624, which is fairly within an acceptable level. However, there is no
universal standard test of significance for this statistic (Botosan, 1997). Milne and Adler
(1999) note that any attempt to establish a single criterion value of acceptable coding
reliability is problematic.
5. Results and discussions
A summary of the disclosures made by both IFIs and CFIs is presented in Table II,
indicating that all the sample reports provided CSRD. The overall level of CSRD was
greater by IFIs than CFIs. The mean of words disclosed by IFIs was 1,160 comparing
to 750 by CFIs. A t-test shows the difference between the two groups is statistically
significant (Table II). To determine the robustness of the results, a non-parametric
Mann-Whitney U-test was also performed. The result of U-test supports the findings
with p-value , 0.05. However, the differences in the level of disclosure varied across the
different themes between the two groups. As shown in Table II, both t-test and U-test
show statistically significant differences between the two groups in some themes. The
proportion of IFIs reporting on philanthropy, Sharia board report and other disclosure
was higher than that of CFIs; this is probably because the two categories (philanthropy
and Sharia board report) were required by the AAOIFI standards. Excluding these
two categories, the difference between the two groups of institutions was less
statistically significant, even though IFIs disclosed slightly more than CFIs.
Table II also shows that IFIs were more inclined to disclose monetary information
with 2,965 words, comparing to 678 words by CFIs and there was no bad news
disclosed by CFIs. Overall, IFIs intended to disclose more than their counterparts.
5.1 Employees
All companies in the sample disclosed some sorts of employee-related information.
Table III reveals the quantity of words on human resource disclosed by each group.
While there is no overall difference in the number of companies between the two groups,
IFIs appear to provide more words of the disclosure than CFIs. The level of words
disclosed varies greatly among sub-themes under employees. While both groups showed
more attention to training and development, and employee benefit, less disclosure was
given to workplace environment and equal opportunity. The disclosures were very
much in qualitative nature as shown in Table III. Also more space was dedicated to good
news disclosure by both groups. IFIs were inclined to disclose more bad news than CFIs.
5.2 Community
Disclosure under this theme covers sub-themes such as community investment,
contribution to national economy and education, health support, provision of
interest-free loans and public welfare. The disclosure results are presented in
Table IV. Overall, 29 banks (69 per cent) of the total sample disclosed information as to
the community and the average number of words disclosed by IFIs was 81 as
compared to 109 by CFIs. Although CFIs reported more community information with
total number of 2,303 words as compared to 1,718 words by IFIs, the number of banks
disclosed community information was 15 (90 per cent) by IFIs as compared to
14 (66 per cent) companies in CFIs. The disclosure of positive community related
information might offer a good opportunity for banks to portray themselves as a good
citizen in their societies. Table IV shows that the level of disclosure varied between the
two groups across all the sub-themes. However, there was a lack of disclosure under
social loan by CFIs in comparison to the disclosure of 338 words by IFIs, which was
CSR disclosure
79
Table II.
CSRD comparisons
between IFIs and CFIs
Themes
Employee
Community
Philanthropy
Product and services
Customer
Sharia Supervisory Board report
Other disclosure
Total
Significance p-value, two-tailed
Quality
Monetary
Quantitative
Qualitative
Good news
Neutral news
Bad news
21
15
19
17
18
19
21
t-test 0.007
2,965
885
23,874
2,2154
5,385
185
5,031
1,718
2,782
2,951
3,853
6,523
4,866
27,724
IFIs
Number of
words
239
81
132
140
183
310
75
1,160
Mean
Number of
words
678
957
14,408
13,978
2,056
21
4,555
14
2,303
4
608
18
2,822
18
4,809
13
946
16,043
Mann-Whitney test 0.004
Number of companies
CFIs
216
109
28
134
229
34
750
Mean
80
Category
Number of
companies
0.601
0.619
0.004
0.783
0.514
0.000
0.019
0.950
0.636
0.000
0.724
0.782
0.000
0.001
t-test
U-test
Significance p
two-tailed
JFRA
8,2
IFIs
Category
Sub-themes
Employee data
Equal opportunity
Training and development
Appreciation and thanks
Employee benefit
End service indemnity
Pension
Localisation of employees
Work place environment
Other
Total
Quality
Monetary
Quantitative
Qualitative
Good news
Neutral news
Bad news
Number of
companies
Number of
words
Number of
companies
Number of
words
14
2
17
15
10
15
6
4
1
8
347
44
1,282
508
1,380
834
158
91
16
371
5,031
7
2
11
17
11
13
6
10
2
4
143
22
867
363
1,090
662
195
604
91
518
4,555
1,101
454
3,476
3,665
1,351
15
5,031
283
724
3,548
3,053
1,502
4,555
IFIs
Category
Sub-themes
Community investment
Contribution to national
economy
Education
Health
Social loan
Social activities support
Other
Total
Quality
Monetary
Quantitative
Qualitative
Good news
Neutral news
Bad news
CSR disclosure
CFIs
Number of
companies
81
Table III.
Disclosure of employee
information by
IFIs and CFIs
CFIs
Number of
words
Number of
companies
Number of
words
575
455
8
4
2
5
1
624
93
69
338
19
0
1,718
8
11
1
8
1
967
122
84
0
664
11
2,303
497
50
1,171
1,530
188
92
114
2,097
2,060
243
expected as disclosure by IFIs under this sub-theme is required under the AAOIFI
standards. In addition, the high level of disclosure was of qualitative nature and tended
to be good news for both groups. While both groups disclosed monetary information,
IFIs provided more disclosure than CFIs.
Table IV.
Disclosure of community
information by
IFIs and CFIs
JFRA
8,2
82
5.3 Philanthropy
This category mainly includes the disclosure related to donation, charity and the
Zakah. As shown in Table V, both groups provided some kinds of philanthropy
disclosure. The total number of companies disclosed information under this theme was
22 (52 per cent of the total sample); of which 4 were CFIs and 18 IFIs. The total number
of words disclosed was considerably higher by IFIs with 2,728 words comparing to
608 words disclosed by CFIs. This is expected because under the AAOIFI standards,
IFIs are required to disclose information on their involvement in the Zakah and charity.
Two types of philanthropy information were disclosed. Much of the information found
in both groups was qualitative and monetary in nature and neutral. While good news
was the dominated type of news, no disclosure was made of bad news by both groups.
5.4 Products and services
Products and services disclosure are classified under four sub-themes including
development and innovation of new products, quality of products and services, ISO or
other quality awards and related disclosure. The number of institutions that disclosed
information under this theme was quite similar for both groups. Table VI indicates that
35 (83 per cent) companies of the total sample disclosed information on products and
services; 17 were IFIs and 18 were CFIs. The level of words disclosed was considerably
high in both groups, with 2,951 words disclosed by IFIs and 2,822 words by CFIs. The
vast majority of disclosures made by both groups were related to the sub-themes of
development and innovation. The nature of information disclosed was very similar and
tended to be qualitative with good news.
5.5 Customer
Disclosure under this theme covers information concerning customer service, meeting
customer needs, customer satisfaction and policy towards insolvent clients. As shown
in Table VII, the disclosure of such information under customer category was very
common among the two groups. A total of 18 companies of each group disclosed
such information. The number of words disclosed ranged from 4,809 words by CFIs
IFIs
Category
Table V.
Disclosure of
philanthropy information
by IFIs and CFIs
Sub-themes
Charity and
donation
Zakah
Other
Total
Quality
Monetary
Quantitative
Qualitative
Good news
Neutral news
Bad news
CFIs
Number of
companies
Number of
words
Number of
companies
Number of
words
9
18
487
2,295
2,782
608
608
1,224
279
1,279
1,319
1,463
235
81
292
608
IFIs
Category
Number of
companies
Number of
words
18
9
3
2,524
256
171
2,951
Sub-themes
New product development
and innovation
Products and services quality
ISO and other awards
Other
Total
Quality
Monetary
Quantitative
Qualitative
Good news
Neutral news
Bad news
CFIs
Number of
Number of
companies
words
17
10
4
2,951
2,913
38
2,822
2,806
16
IFIs
Category
Themes
Customer service
Meeting customer needs
Customer satisfaction
Policy towards insolvent
clients
Difficult to reach customer
Other
Total
Quality
Monetary
Quantitative
Qualitative
Good news
Neutral news
Bad news
2,284
386
188
2,822
CSR disclosure
83
Table VI.
Disclosure of product and
service information by
IFIs and CFIs
CFIs
Number of
companies
Number of
words
Number of
companies
Number of
words
14
6
7
2,826
135
267
16
3,742
250
1
11
12
25
588
3,853
1
9
19
798
4,809
77
3,776
3,543
310
38
4,771
4,514
295
to 3,853 words by IFIs. The most predominant sub-theme was customer service. There
was a lack of disclosure by CFIs concerning the themes of policy towards insolvent
clients and meeting customer needs. The nature of disclosure was somehow similar for
both groups, with the vast majority of disclosure were qualitative and good news.
5.6 Sharia supervisory board report (SSBR)
The SSB is an independent external committee to observe the conduct of business and
provide assurance to the stakeholders that the business is carried out in accordance
with the Islamic principles. Annual reports produced by the SSB provide the necessary
Table VII.
Disclosure of customer
information by IFIs
and CFIs
JFRA
8,2
84
assurance to Muslim clients and shareholders as to if the business meets their ethical
expectations. As the disclosure of SSBR in annual reports is recommended under the
AAOIFI standards, this theme was unique to IFIs and no disclosure of this theme was
made by CFIs[6]. As shown in Table VIII, SSBR was included in the annual reports by
19 companies (90 per cent) out of 21 IFIs. The large number of IFIs disclosing SSBR
was not surprising since IFIs need to assure their stakeholders that all their activities
and products are complying with Sharia. However, the level of information disclosed
varied greatly among IFIs and across the sub-themes. As shown in Table VIII, the vast
majority of the disclosures tended to be qualitative with a mixture of bad, neutral and
good news. The bad news was largely concerned with transactions which contradicted
Sharia, and the ways of dealing with the income generated from such transactions.
Very few companies disclosed monetary information.
5.7 Other CSR disclosures
Other disclosures are concerned with social information in the sample of the annual
reports that were not captured in the previous themes. It includes mentioning the name
of Allah and his Prophet, praising Allah, verses from the Holy Quran, and adherence
to Islamic principles and ethical conduct. A total of 34 companies within the sample
disclosed some information under this theme. The information provided tended to fall
into two streams, mainly the Islamic values and the ethical values. Table IX presents
the disclosures by each group. All IFIs provided information with 4,866 words
disclosed, in comparison to only 13 companies by CFIs with total 946 words disclosed.
Table IX shows that most of these disclosures by IFIs came under Islamic value and
commitment to Sharia. Most of the disclosures by CFIs were related to commitment to
ethical conducts. Few CFIs companies disclose monetary and quantitative disclosure.
The majority of these disclosures by IFIs were purely qualitative with a mixture of
good, bad and neutral news.
6. Discussion and conclusion
The above results of content analysis reveal two interesting observations. First,
CSRD is presently very much a common practice among financial institutions from
IFIs
Category
Table VIII.
Disclosure of SSBR
information by IFIs
Themes
Background on the SSB members
Provision of fatwa[7] and consultancy
Examination of documents
Compliance with Sharia
Total
Quality
Monetary
Quantitative
Qualitative
Good news
Neutral news
Bad news
Number of companies
Number of words
19
19
19
19
1,708
130
2,617
2,068
6,523
34
6,489
4,553
1,810
160
IFIs
Category
Themes
Islamic values
Commitment to ethical
conduct
Adherence to Sharia
General statement of CSR
Total
Quality
Monetary
Quantitative
Qualitative
Good news
Neutral news
Bad news
CSR disclosure
CFIs
Number of
companies
Number of
words
Number of
companies
Number of
words
15
1,261
79
4
21
9
121
3,288
196
4,866
232
635
946
109
25
4,732
4,631
225
10
68
878
946
developing countries in the Gulf region, although the levels of disclosures differ across
different institutions. In most of those disclosures there were little differences between
IFIs and CFIs, suggesting that some common themes and concerns are applicable to all
financial institutions, regardless of their business ethics and objectives. This perhaps
reflects the accounting-globalization interrelation (Gallhofer and Haslam, 2006).
Second, IFIs provide additional disclosures under the AAOIFI standards with a view to
justifying their ethical values and accountability to God. So far little evidence suggests
that such a disclosure would sufficiently discharge the accountability to God and meet
the expectations of religious needs in the context of Islam environments. Nevertheless,
such additional disclosures as shown in this study prove, to some extent, the influences
of Islamic religion on CSRD. This raises an interesting question for further research as
to whether other religions (e.g. Buddhism in some Asian countries and Christianity in
the west) would also play some roles in CSRD. Such research would help identify
whether the findings of this study are unique to Islamic societies (in this case it would
dispute the universalism of religious influences on CSRD) or the findings share similar
evidence from studies based on other religions. Clearly a questioning approach should
be employed to interpret our results which were derived from a content analysis of
limited numbers of annual reports.
Yet, it can be argued that in addition to providing information for economic
decisions, there may be a further primary objective for corporate reporting of IFIs from
an Islamic perspective. This primary objective, noted in the literature, is to ensure that
the organisation discharges the Islamic concept of accountability. The statutory
requirement per se under the AAOIFI standards including the disclosure of SSBR, the
Zakah, charity donation and free interest loan statement probably emphasises this
objective. The lack of disclosure by CFIs under those theme and sub-themes could be
justified on the basis that these disclosures merely relate to the religious practice and
ensure that the IFIs discharge the Islamic concept of accountability; this has nothing to
do with the business of CFIs, even they operate in the similar political and economic
environment.
85
Table IX.
Disclosure of other
related information by
IFIs and CFIs
JFRA
8,2
86
It can also be argued that the disclosure of negative news by IFIs (particularly
regarding transactions which contradict Sharia, and the ways to deal with the income
generated from such transactions) is a sign of the positive role played by SSB in
transparency and social responsibility. The duty to disclose or tell the truth is very
important in the Islamic context and this applies to businesses as much as to individuals,
even if such disclosure would work against the firm or person himself (Maali et al., 2006).
Although the effectiveness of SSB under the Islamic corporate governance system is
unclear due to a dearth of research, our results of additional disclosure, inter alia, the
disclosure of negative news by IFIs could indicate some potential of this religion-based
supervisory board and its reports on corporate social responsibility. An externally
independent ethical board, in addition to the sole board of directors could be an option to
overcome some of the drawbacks witnessed presently in the western market economy of
corporate governance and corporate social responsibility.
Our study presents an empirical result as to the current status of CSRD in IFIs
through a comparison with CFIs operating in the identical political, social and
economic environment. Using the content analysis approach, we compare the annual
reports of 21 CFIs with 21 IFIs operating in the Gulf region. Our results show
significant differences in the level and the extent of the disclosure between IFIs and
CFIs, largely due to the disclosure made by IFIs concerning religion-related themes and
information, including Sharia supervisory board reports, the Zakah and charity
donation and free interest loan under the guidance of the AAOIFI. Excluding this
supplementary disclosure, the difference between IFIs and CFIs of CSRD was not
significant. Yet, IFIs intended to disclose more negative news than CFIs. The above
results lead intuitively to the conception of Islamic influence on CSRD, which may
provide an additional perspective to the existing literature on CSRD.
Nevertheless, the results of our study are subject to a number of limitations. We did
not examine the longitudinal data of CSRD. As a result, our study can only unearth the
status of CSRD in a particular year, but cannot provide a trend and development
picture. Future research should try to overcome this limitation. Another limitation is
that the sample is restricted to financial institutions operating in the Gulf region. The
findings would be more generalisable if more IFIs and CFIs are included in the sample.
Future research might extend the scope of this study by including IFIs from other
regions (e.g. South-East Asia and Africa) where IFIs are actively in operation as well as
including non-financial institutions.
Notes
1. Sunah linguistically means path. In this context, it stands for the saying, actions and
approvals of prophet Mohamed pray and peace upon him.
2. The Zakah, literally means purification. It is one of the five pillars of Islam. The Zakah is
payable once every year at the end of the Zakah period (i.e. one lunar year). It is payable on a
productive asset that has been possessed for one lunar year. However, assets and goods,
which are for consumption, are exempt from the Zakah, provided they are not aimed for
trade.
3. The prophet Mohamed (peace and prayer be upon him) said When a person dies, his good
deeds come to end, except for three things: charity that continues to benefit others,
knowledge that continues to be benefit, and pious child who prays for him.
4. Fiscal year of 2004 was chosen when this study initially as a PhD project started.
References
Adams, C.A. and Harte, G. (1998), The changing portrayal of the employment of women in
British banks and retail companies corporate annual reports, Accounting, Organizations
and Society, Vol. 23 No. 8, pp. 781-812.
Alnajjar, F. (2000), Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure of US fortune
500 firms: an application of content analysis, Advances in Environmental Accounting and
Management, Vol. 1, pp. 163-200.
Anuar, H., Sulaiman, M. and Ahmad, N. (2004), Environmental reporting of Shariah approved
companies in Malaysia, Proceeding of International Accounting Conference II,
International Islamic University, Kuala Lumpur.
Bagader, A., El-Chirazi El-Sabbagh, A., As-Sayyid Al-Glayand, M., Samarrai, M.U.I. and
Liewellyan, O.A. (1994), Environmental protection in Islam, IUCN Environmental Policy
and Law Paper No. 20, IUCN, Gland.
Botosan, C. (1997), Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital, The Accounting Review,
Vol. 72 No. 3, pp. 323-49.
Campbell, D.T. (2004), A longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of environmental disclosure
in UK companies: a research note, The British Accounting Review, Vol. 36 No. 1,
pp. 107-17.
Chapra, U. (1992), Islam and the Economic Challenge, The Islamic Foundation, Leicester.
Deegan, C. (2002), The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosure- a theoretical
foundation, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 282-311.
Deegan, C. and Blomquist, C. (2006), Stakeholders influence on corporate reporting:
an exploration of the interaction between WWWF-Australia and Australian minerals
industry, Accounting Organization and Society, Vol. 31 Nos 4-5, pp. 343-72.
Deegan, C. and Gordon, B. (1996), A study of the environmental disclosure practices of
Australian corporations, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 187-99.
Deegan, C. and Rankin, M. (1996), Do Australian companies report environmental news
objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosure by firms prosecuted successfully by
the environmental protection authority, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 50-67.
Dusuki, A. and Dar, H. (2005), Dose corporate social responsibility pay off? An empirical
examination of stakeholders perspective, paper presented at the 2nd International
Conference on Business Performance, London, 22 November.
Ebrahim, M. and Joo, T. (2001), Islamic Banking in Brunei, International Journal Social
Economics, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp. 314-37.
CSR disclosure
87
JFRA
8,2
88
Ernst and Ernst (1978), Social Responsibility Disclosure: 1978 Survey, Survey of Fortune
500 Annual Reports, Ernst and Ernst, Cleveland, OH.
Friedman, A.L. and Miles, S. (2001), Socially responsible investment and corporate social and
environmental reporting in the UK: an exploratory study, British Accounting Review,
Vol. 33, pp. 523-48.
Gallhofer, S. and Haslam, J. (2006), The accounting globalization interrelation an overview
with some reflections on the neglected dimension of emancipatory potentiality, Critical
Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 17, pp. 903-34.
Gao, S.S., Heravi, S. and Xiao, J.Z. (2005), Determinants of corporate social and environmental
reporting in Hong Kong: a research note, Accounting Forum, Vol. 29, pp. 233-42.
Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995a), Constructing a research database of social and
environmental reporting by UK companies: a methodological note, Accounting, Auditing
& Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 87-101.
Gray, R., Kouhy, R. and Lavers, S. (1995b), Corporate social and environmental reporting:
a review and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure, Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 47-77.
Gray, R., Owen, D. and Maunders, K. (1987), Corporate Social Reporting: Accounting and
Accountability, Prentice-Hall, London.
Gray, R., Owen, D. and Maunders, K. (1988), Corporate social reporting: emerging trends in
accountability and the social contract, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 6-20.
Guthrie, J. and Mathews, M. (1985), Corporate social reporting in Australia, Research in
Corporate Social Performance and Policy, Vol. 7, pp. 251-71.
Guthrie, J. and Parker, L. (1989), Corporate social reporting: a Rebuttal of legitimacy theory,
Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 19 No. 76, pp. 343-52.
Hamid, S., Craig, R. and Clarke, F. (1993), Religion: a confounding cultural element in the
international harmonization of accounting?, Abacus, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 131-48.
Haniffa, R.M. and Cooke, T. (2001), Corporate Social Reporting in Malaysia: Impact of Culture and
Corporate Governance Structure, Discussion Paper in Accounting and Finance, University
of Exeter, Exeter.
Haniffa, R.M. and Hudaib, M. (2007), Exploring the ethical identity of Islamic banks via
communication in annual reports, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 76 No. 1.
Hofstede, G.H. (1983), The Cultural relativity of organisational practices and theories, Journal
of International Business Studies, Fall, pp. 75-89.
Ince, D. (1998), Corporate social and environmental reporting: an application of stakeholder
theory, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Exeter, Exeter.
Kamla, R. (2005), Social accounting in selection of Arab countries: critical and postcolonial
perspectives, unpublished PhD thesis, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh.
Keller, N. (1994), Reliance of the Traveller: A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law by Ibn Naqib
Al-Masri, Amana, Beltsville, MD.
Lewis, M. (2001), Islam and accounting, Accounting Forum, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 103-27.
Llias, S. (2008), Islamic Finance: Overview and Policy Concerns, Congressional Research Service,
Washington, DC.
Maali, B., Casson, P. and Napier, C. (2003), Social reporting by Islamic banks, working paper,
University of Southampton, Southampton.
Maali, B., Casson, P. and Napier, C. (2006), Social reporting by Islamic banks, ABACUS, Vol. 42
No. 2.
CSR disclosure
89
JFRA
8,2
90
Further reading
Albukari, A. (n.d.), Sahih Albukari, available at: http://hadith.al-islam.com/Page.
aspx?pageid192&BookID24&TOCID1430 (accessed 27 November 2008).
Bauer, R. and Fenn, D. (1973), What is a corporate social audit?, Harvard Business Review,
Vol. 51 No. 10, pp. 37-48.
(The) Holy Quran (1410 H), Mushaf Al-Madinah An-Nabawiayah the Holy Quran: English
Translation of Meanings and Commentary, King Fahd Holy Quran Printing Complex,
Mecca.
Khan, M. (1996), The English translation of Sahih Al Bukhari with the Arabic Text, Al-Saadawi,
Alexandria, VA.
Appendix
Employee
Community
Philanthropy
Customer
Table AI.
Disclosure themes and
sub-themes
Other
Evidence
Definition
Monetary
Disclosure will be classified as monetary if it includes monetary value or measure
Quantitative Disclosure will be classified as quantitative if it is expressed in quantitative terms
Qualitative
Disclosure that is not classified as monetary or quantitative, such as general statement
of an opinion
Type of disclosure
Good news
Disclosure which includes, for example, details where these details have a creditable
reflection on company, any statements which reflect credit on company, upbeat
analysis/discussion/statements, etc.
Neutral news Disclosure will be counted as neutral news if it refers to general policy statement or
intent within statutory minimum with no details of what or how; statement of facts
whose credit/discredit to company is not obvious unaccompanied by editorializing
Bad news
Any statement, which reflects/might reflect discredit on the company, including, for
example, numbers made redundant, accident, negative feedback from customers [. . .]
Corresponding author
Simon Gao can be contacted at: s.gao@napier.ac.uk
CSR disclosure
91
Table AII.
Defined evidence of
CSRD and type of news