Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
ANSYS 2011
Gr pstator
22
=
3 = 22 = protor .
3
ANSYS 2011
40 mm
64 mm
92 mm
88.6 mm
80.8 mm
80.2 mm
67.2 mm
66.6 mm
17.5 mm
22
25
3
36
64 mm
92 mm
60 mm
3.9 mm
6.5 mm
0.6 mm
0.6 mm
22
25
3
36
159.77
124.4
ANSYS 2011
Fig. 4. The plot of magnetic flux density on the surface of rotor iron core
(Motor II).
Fig. 2. An axial-flux-modulated-motor (Motor II) (assembled view).
Fig. 5. The plot of magnetic flux density on the cross-section of x-z plane
(Motor II).
Fig. 3. An axial-flux-modulated-motor (Motor II) (disassembled view).
ANSYS 2011
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
Fig. 7. The induced emf at full-load operation (Motor II).
TABLE IV COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT MOTORS
Motor type
Motor I
Motor II
(Radial flux)
(Axial flux)
Output torque (Nm)
58.0
81.2
Coreloss (W)
Copper loss (W)
Total coreloss and copper loss
59.0
282.3
341.3
98.5
223.3
321.8
V. CONCLUSION
The RFMM can be modeled using 2-D FEM and the
AFMM can be modeled using 3-D FEM. For the in-wheel
drive of HEV, AFMM has higher power density than that of
RFMM. The manufacturing process of AFMM is much
simpler than that of RFMM.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported in part by The Hong Kong
Polytechnic University under Grant B-Q18X.
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]