Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
HYDROPOWER PROJECT
Contents
List of Acronyms .......................................................................................................... xi
1
1.2
1.3
1.4
2.2
2.3
2.4
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
WAPDA
August 2011
ii
3.6
3.7
4.2
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
WAPDA
August 2011
iii
6.2
6.3
6.4
WAPDA
August 2011
iv
7.2
7.3
Significant Environmental Impacts of the Project and their Mitigations ........ 8-1
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
WAPDA
August 2011
8.6
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.5
vi
Annexes
Annex A:
Consultation Details
Annex B:
Annex C:
Annex D:
WAPDA
August 2011
vii
List of Table
Table 2.1: Triggering the World Bank Policies ................................................... 2-12
Table 2.2: Compliance of Project with GoP Legislation and WB
Safeguard Policies ................................................................................ 2-13
Table 3.1: Salient Features of the Project .............................................................. 3-3
Table 3.2: Estimated Cost of the Project .............................................................. 3-19
Table 4.1: Predicted Growth in Electrical Demand (DISCO-WISE
Load Forecast (MW)) ............................................................................ 4-4
Table 4.2: Existing Installed Capacity of PEPCO System as of 30 June 2010 ...... 4-6
Table 4.3: Current Generating Capacity and Shortfall in Pakistan ..................... 4-9
Table 4.4: Criteria of the Alternative Site Locations ........................................... 4-12
Table 5.1: Main Activities during Consultation Process ....................................... 5-2
Table 5.2: Summary of Stakeholders Concerns/Recommendations .................... 5-7
Table 6.1: Average Monthly Relative Humidity (%) ............................................. 6-5
Table 6.2: Soil Analysis of Project Area ................................................................. 6-9
Table 6.3: Mean Monthly Flow Releases from Tarbela Reservoir (Mm3) ......... 6-11
Table 6.4: Historical Irrigation Releases from Tunnel 4 (Mm3) ......................... 6-12
Table 6.5: Historical Irrigation Releases from Tunnel 5 (Mm3) ......................... 6-13
Table 6.6: Surface Water Quality of Project Area .............................................. 6-15
Table 6.7: Standards Adopted by WAPDA.......................................................... 6-15
Table 6.8: Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Results ........................................... 6-16
Table 6.9: Baseline Noise Monitoring Results ...................................................... 6-17
Table 6.10: Average Daily Traffic in the Project Area .......................................... 6-19
Table 6.11: Game Reserves in Haripur district ..................................................... 6-21
Table 6.12: Ghazi Area Forest Statement .............................................................. 6-22
Table 6.13: Faunal Species at the Various Project Areas Surveyed ..................... 6-25
Table 6.14: Tarbela Dam Reservoir Characteristics ............................................. 6-26
Table 6.15: Estimated Numbers of Households and Population in
Project Area ......................................................................................... 6-28
Table 6.16: Livestock in the Swabi and Haripur district ...................................... 6-30
Table 6.17: Health Facilities in the Swabi and Haripur Districts ......................... 6-34
Table 6.18: Availability of Health Facilities in the Project Area........................... 6-34
Table 6.19: Educational Facilities in the Swabi and Haripur Districts................. 6-35
Table 6.20: Education Facilities available in the Project Area ............................. 6-36
Table 6.21: Source of Drinking Water by Locality (%) ........................................ 6-37
WAPDA
August 2011
viii
Table 6.22: Level of Formal Education of Literate Female Respondents ............. 6-41
Table 6.23: Occupational Status of Women Respondents ..................................... 6-42
Table 6.24: Health Facilities Availed by Women in Last Year ............................. 6-42
Table 6.25: Most Common Diseases Prevailing in the Project Area ..................... 6-43
Table 6.26: Pressing Needs of Women ................................................................... 6-43
Table 6.27: Womens Preference for Skill Development ....................................... 6-44
Table 8.1: Parameters for Determining Magnitude............................................... 8-2
Table 8.2: Criteria for Determining Sensitivity ..................................................... 8-2
Table 8.3: Assessment of Impact Significance........................................................ 8-3
Table 8.4: Significance of Environmental Impacts ................................................ 8-5
Table 9.1: Significance of Social Impacts ............................................................... 9-2
Table 11.1: Environmental and Social Trainings .................................................. 11-5
Table 11.2: Environmental Mitigation and Monitoring Plan Construction
(and Decommissioning) ....................................................................... 11-8
Table 11.3: Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan Operation..... 11-22
Table 11.4: Monitoring of Predicted Effects ........................................................ 11-25
Table 11.5: Grievance Classification Criteria ...................................................... 11-30
Table 11.6: Stakeholders Concerns/Recommendations and their Redressal .... 11-31
Table 11.7: Cost Estimates for Management and Monitoring Activities ............ 11-35
List of Figures
Figure 1.1: Tarbela Location Map ........................................................................... 1-2
Figure 1.2: Project Area and Location of Main Project Components .................... 1-4
Figure 2.1: Pakistan EIA Process............................................................................. 2-3
Figure 3.1: Satellite View of Tarbela Dam .............................................................. 3-2
Figure 3.2: Hydro Scheme Schematic ...................................................................... 3-4
Figure 3.3: Option 2 Section (a) ............................................................................... 3-5
Figure 3.4: Geologic Section along Centre-line of Tunnel 4.................................... 3-6
Figure 3.5: Penstock Connection and Powerhouse Location .................................. 3-7
Figure 3.6: Alternate Powerhouse Locations........................................................... 3-8
Figure 3.7: Transversal Section View of Powerhouse through Unit Axis .............. 3-9
Figure 3.8: Longitudinal Section View of Powerhouse with Three
450 MW Units ........................................................................................ 3-9
Figure 3.9: Excavation Sequence for Tunnel 4 Raised Intake .............................. 3-15
Figure 3.10: Construction Program of Intake Option 2.......................................... 3-16
WAPDA
August 2011
ix
WAPDA
August 2011
List of Acronyms
AC
Alternating Current
AIS
asl
ASR
BCM
BOD
BP
CITES
CLO
cm
Centimeter
DC
Direct Current
DCO
DISCOs
Distribution companies
EA
Environmental Assessment
ECA
ECP
EHS
EIA
EMP
EPA
EPD
ERP
ES
Environment Specialist
ESA
ESM
ESMP
ESMU
ESS
FESCO
WAPDA
August 2011
xi
FOS
Factor of Safety
GBHPP
GBTI
GENCOs
GEPCO
GIKIEST
GIS
GoP
Government of Pakistan
GT Road
Ha
Hectare
HESCO
HLSZ
HSE
HSES
IEE
IESCO
IFC
IUCN
KESC
Km
Kilometer
KPI
KP
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
LESCO
LOS
Meter
MAF
MCT
MEA
MEPCO
mm
millimeter
WAPDA
August 2011
xii
Mm3
MMP
MSDS
MW
Megawatt
NCS
NEQS
NGO
Non-Governmental Organization
NTDC
OPs
OPC
Pak-EPA
PAPs
PEPA
PEPC
PEPCO
PEPO
PKR
Pakistan Rupees
POPs
PPE
PPIB
ppm
QESCO
RAP
RBC
RCC
Rpm
RSA
SA
Social Assessment
SCARP
SIMF
WAPDA
August 2011
xiii
SMO
SS
Social Scientist
TDP
TESCO
TJV
TMP
T4CJV
T4HP
UNFCCC
VCC
WAPDA
WB
World Bank
WBG
WEC
WHO
WWF
WAPDA
August 2011
xiv
1 Introduction
1.1
Background
The Tarbela Dam is one of the largest earth-fill dam constructions in the world. The dam
is situated on the Indus River in the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) at a distance
of about 70 kilometers (km) NW of Islamabad and about 50 km upstream of the city of
Attock (see Figure 1.1). The reservoir behind the dam is almost 100 km long and
measures 260 km when completely filled. The live storage capacity of the reservoir was
initially 11.9 billion m, but this has been reduced due to siltation during 35 years of
operation to 6.8 billion m. The Tarbela Dam is 2,743 m long, 143 m high above the
river bed and has two spillways cutting through the left bank and discharging into a side
valley. At the right bank there are four tunnels, each of about 900 m length as bypass for
irrigation releases and/or power generation. Tunnel 5 used for irrigation releases is
situated at the left bank. In three of the four tunnels on the right bank the water can be
used for both irrigation and for power generation. Tunnel 4 is exclusively designed for
irrigation supply.
The Tarbela Dam Project (TDP) was developed during the seventies of the last century in
the framework of the Indus Basin Water Master Plan. Initially the main purpose of TDP
was to supply irrigation water to the densely populated agricultural areas in Punjab and
Sindh. Then, starting in the mid-eighties power generation capacity was added in three
subsequent hydro-electrical project extensions, installing a total of 3,478 mega watts
(MW) generating capacity on respectively Tunnel 1 (four turbines), Tunnel 2 (six
turbines) and Tunnel 3 (four turbines). So far there is no allowance for power generation
on Tunnel 4, which is exclusively used for irrigation. For the project 120 villages along
the Indus were submerged and a total of 96,000 persons had to be resettled and 33,200
hectares (ha) of land acquired.
The Ghazi Barotha HydroPower Project (GBHPP) is a run-of-river project situated
downstream and not far from Tarbela on the Indus. Near Ghazi town, which is situated
seven kilometers downstream of Tarbela, water is diverted through a 52 km long canal to
Barotha village (near Attock) where the power complex is located with a generating
capacity of 1,450 MW of electricity. After passing through the powerhouse, the diverted
water is returned to the Indus. The construction started in 1995 and the project was
completed in 2003. With the construction of GHBP the water level in the Indus below the
Tarbela dam has been raised and hence areas along the river have been flooded. A total of
4,770 ha of land were acquired for the construction of this project.
1.2
The Tarbela 4th Extension Hydropower Project (T4HP) has been proposed to add
generating capacity on Tunnel 4. The demand for power in the country is rapidly
increasing with eight percent per year and there are frequent periods with load shedding
all over the country. Currently there is an estimated shortfall of 7,311 MW in winter and
3,347 MW in summer.
The construction of a new hydropower plant at Tarbela with 1,410 MW additional
generating capacity would enable maximum utilization of the available power potential
and make an important contribution to the overall power supply in the country.
WAPDA
August 2011
1-1
Figure 1.1:
WAPDA
August 2011
1-2
The project is considered to be very attractive and a low risk- high reward operation
aimed at providing over 3,871 GWh annually of least-cost low-carbon renewable energy.
This is so attractive because the dam, storage reservoir and tunnel are already constructed
and water supply is assured.
Another important advantage in development of T4HP is that it will be free of
resettlement and litigation problems, which are often major causes of delay in hydroelectric projects. Environmental and social issues are relatively minor, since most of the
infrastructure is already in place. Basic infrastructure and other facilities like offices,
labor camps and residential accommodation are largely available and only have to be
renovated and possibly expanded against modest cost. The installation of additional
generating capacity will not influence the irrigation release capacity of the dam.
1.3
Potential adverse effects of the T4HP project are described in the present Environmental
and Social Assessment (ESA) report. Possible mitigating measures to offset, reduce or
compensate these impacts are included in the Environmental and Social Management
Plan. The project will be implemented on the right bank of the Indus River in a limited
area concentrated around the inlet and outlet of tunnel 4 of the Tarbela Dam. Direct and
indirect impacts of the project will mainly occur in the immediate surrounding (few km)
with the exception of some borrow areas and quarries for construction materials situated
at larger distance. For safety reasons an area of 5 km upstream and 10 km downstream of
the dam has been studied during the ESA (see Figure 1.2 for the Project Area and
location of various Project components). Most negative environmental and social
impacts of the project will be experienced during the period of construction, and will
mostly be temporary and reversible in nature.
Negative impacts during operation and maintenance of the project will be very limited.
Cumulative and induced impacts of the project are not expected since the water regime of
the Indus downstream of Tarbela will not change. Generally, during operation the
environmental and economic benefits will be very substantial through the production of
clean and cheap low-carbon hydro power. This is especially true when compared with
alternative means of generating electricity through thermal power stations (coal, oil, gas
fired). The direct adverse social impacts of the project are also expected to be relatively
minor. Most of these impacts will occur during construction and are associated with the
contractors operations and the interaction of the work force with the local communities.
The previous Tarbela project (1968-1976) and the Ghazi Barotha project (1995-2003)
involved huge land acquisition and resettlement operations. In a number of cases the
compensation and resettlement of affected families has not been solved for a variety of
reasons. The Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority (WAPDA) has
indicated that the current project offers an opportunity to address the so-called
resettlement legacy from the previous projects.
WAPDA
August 2011
1-3
WAPDA
August 2011
1-4
1.4
WAPDA engaged a team of two independent consultants - Mr. Reitse Koopmans and Mr.
Mohammad Omar Khalid to assess the environmental as well as social impacts of the
project, to prepare the environmental and social management plan, and to compile the
main ESA report as well as the present Summary ESA report.
The baseline data collection, project description compilation, stakeholder consultations,
and initial impact assessment was carried out by a team from the Design Consultants, led
by Mr. Azmat Beg (environment) and Dr. Ashraf Bodla (environment, ecology)
supported by Ms. Marina Maxwell (environment), Mr. Rana Mohammad Saleem
(sociology), Mr. Abdul Hafiz (sociology), Ms. Yasmeen Taher (gender), Mr. Zafar Iqbal
(economist), Mr. Omer Rasheed (environment), Mr. Mohammad Dawood Khan
(environment), Ms. Afia Hussain (environment), Ms. Ujala Saleem (environment), Dr.
Muhammad Aleem Chaudhry (wildlife), Mr. Waseem Ahmed Khan (wildlife), Dr.
Zaheer-ud-Din Khan (flora), Mr. Muhammad Ajaib (flora), Dr. Mohammad Sharif
Mughal (fisheries), and Mr. Tahir Omer (fisheries). The resettlement legacy has been
studied by a team composed of Mr. Zafar Iqbal, Mr. Omer Rasheed, Mr. Asif Iqbal, Mr.
Rana Mohammad Saleem, Dr. Ashraf Bodla, and Mr. M. Chaudhry and supported by Ms.
Marielle Rowan.
WAPDA
August 2011
1-5
General
2.2
Pakistan
2.2.1 Overview
The enactment of comprehensive legislation on the environment, covering multiple areas
of concern is an ongoing phenomenon in Pakistan. The basic policy and legislative
framework for the protection of the environment and overall biodiversity in the country is
now in place. The legislation contains many laws in the form of Acts and Ordinances
which have a direct or indirect relevance in the layout, design, construction and operation
of the Tarbela 4th Extension Hydropower Project.
This summary of relevant Pakistan legislation is structured as follows:
Environmental Legislation;
In accordance with the Pakistan Environmental Protection Act (PEPA) 1997 and the
Pakistan Environmental Protection Agency (Pak-EPA) IEE/EIA Regulations 2000, an
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is required for hydroelectric power projects
exceeding a generation capacity of 50 MW and with transmission lines with a capacity of
more than 11 kV. The Project will generate 1,350 MW, therefore an EIA for this project
is mandatory.
PEPA 1997 is the basic legislative tool empowering the government to frame regulations
for the protection of the environment. The Act is applicable to almost all environmental
parameters pertaining to air, water, soil and noise pollution, and handling of hazardous
wastes, as well as to the social and socioeconomic aspects.
The Act provides the framework for: protection and conservation of species, wildlife
habitats and biodiversity; conservation of renewable resources; establishment of
standards for the quality of the ambient air, water and land; establishment of
Environmental Tribunals; appointment of Environmental Magistrates; and Initial
Environmental Examination (IEE) and EIA approval. Penalties have been prescribed for
those who contravene the Act. The key features of the Act have a direct bearing on the
proposed project requirement for an IEE and EIA for development projects. The PakEPA has delegated the power of review and approval of environmental assessments to the
WAPDA
August 2011
2-1
provincial EPAs. The following are the key features of the Act that have a direct bearing
on the Project area:
Section 12-I (IEE and EIA) requires that No proponent of a project shall
commence construction or operation unless he has filed with the Federal Agency an
IEE or, where the project is likely to cause an adverse environmental effect, an EIA,
and has obtained from the Federal Agency approval in respect thereof.
Section 12-2b (Review of IEE and EIA). The Federal Agency shall review the EIA
report and accord its approval subject to such conditions as it may deem fit to
impose, or require that the EIA be re-submitted after such modifications as may be
stipulated or rejected, the project as being contrary to environmental objectives.
Section 18 (Offences by Bodies Corporate). Where any contravention of this Act has
been committed by a body corporate, and it is proved that such offence has been
committed with the consent or connivance or is attributed to any negligence on the
part of any director, partner, manager, secretary or other officer of the body
corporate, such director, partner, manager, secretary or other officer of the body
corporate, shall be deemed guilty of such contravention along with the body
corporate and shall be punished accordingly.
WAPDA
August 2011
2-2
The EPA prepared the regulations during 2000 for Review of IEE and EIA under the
powers conferred upon it by the PEPA. These Regulations categorize development
projects for IEE and EIA into two schedules: Schedules I and II. Projects are classified
on the basis of the expected degree and magnitude of environmental impacts. The
projects listed in Schedule-I include those where the range of environmental issues is
comparatively narrow and the issues can be understood and managed through less
extensive analysis in the form of an IEE, whereas the projects listed in Schedule-II are
those which are likely to cause significant adverse impacts and hence require extensive
analysis in the form of an EIA. Figure 2.1 below provides an outline of the EIA process
in Pakistan.
Figure 2.1:
PEPA confirms
acceptability of EIA
PEPA publicises
EIA in national press
EIA displayed
in Public Place
Day 1
PEPA requests
specified additional
information
Where to
view EIA
Day 10
EIA circulated
in Government
Public Hearing
Location & time
(min 30 days hence)
DGs
Expert
Committee
Sector
Advisory
Committee
Site
Inspection
Committee
>Day 40
Proponent acceptance
Of decision conditions
Approval with
further conditions
Approval as
per EIA
Rejected
(Schedule VI)
30 months
No objection certificate
Construction
(under EIA conditions)
PEPA
inspection
and CC
WAPDA
August 2011
2-3
The Pakistan Penal Code deals with offences where public or private property and/or
human lives are affected due to the intentional or accidental misconduct of an individual
or body of people. In the context of the environment, the Penal Code empowers local
authorities to control noise, toxic emissions and disposal of effluents.
Pakistan Explosives Act, 1884
This Act provides regulations for the handling, transportation and use of explosives
during quarrying, blasting and other purposes. The construction of the new power house
may require blasting at rocky areas making these regulations applicable for this project.
Land Acquisition Act, 1894
This Act is the primary law for acquisition of land and built-up properties for public
interest in Pakistan and also sets out the procedure and rules for acquisition and
compensating the land owners, including for any damage caused to their properties, crops
and trees by a project, however it lacks the mechanism to address the complex issues of
resettlement. The Act comprises 55 sections dealing with area notifications, surveys,
acquisition, compensation, appointment awards, disputes resolution, penalties and
exemptions. For the T4HP, ownership of the land required for project execution belongs
to the client (WAPDA), hence no land acquisition is likely to take place.
Forest Act, 1927
This Act authorizes provincial forest department to establish forest reserves and protected
forests. The Act prohibits any person from: setting fires in the forest; quarrying stone;
removal of any forest produce; or causing any damage to the forest by cutting trees or
clearing areas for cultivation or any other purpose.
KP Wildlife Protection, Preservation, Conservation and Management Act,
1975 (NWFP Act No. V of 1975)
This law was enacted to protect the provinces wildlife resources directly and other
natural resources indirectly. It classifies wildlife by degree of protection, i.e., animals
that may be hunted on a permit or special license, and species that are protected and
cannot be hunted under any circumstances. The Act specifies restrictions on hunting and
trade in animals, trophies, or meat. The Act also defines various categories of wildlife
protected areas, i.e., National Parks, Wildlife Sanctuaries, and Game Reserve. The project
activities will have to be carried out in accordance with this Act. In particular, no
activities will be carried out inside any protected areas defined under the Act.
Factories Act, 1934
The clauses relevant to the project are those which concern health, safety and welfare of
workers, disposal of solid wastes and effluents, and damage to private and public
WAPDA
August 2011
2-4
property. The Factories Act also provides regulations for handling and disposal of toxic
and hazardous materials. As construction activity is classified as industry, these
regulations will be applicable to the project construction contractors.
Protection of Trees Act, 1949
This Act prohibits cutting or lopping of trees along roads and canals planted by the Forest
Department, without permission of the Forest Department.
Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act, 1958
The Act provides for the unified and coordinated development of the water and power
resources of Pakistan. This Act authorizes WAPDA to develop water and power
resources in the country through construction and operation of water storages and power
houses and erecting electrical transmission lines. WAPDA also has the powers and
obligations of a licensee under the Telegraphy Act of 1910. This Act also establishes
policy for land acquisition and compensation, as well as the degree of liability of
WAPDA for damages sustained to landowners or others.
Motor Vehicle Ordinance, 1965
The Ordinance deals with the powers of the Motor Vehicle Licensing Authorities and
empowers other related agencies to regulate traffic rules, vehicle speed and weight limits,
vehicle use, to erect traffic signs, and to prescribe special duties for drivers in the case of
accidents. It also prescribes powers to police officers to check and penalize traffic
offenders. At the same time, the Ordinance empowers the regional transport authority to
operate as a quasi-judicial body at district level to monitor road transport, licensing
requirements, and compensations for deaths or injuries to passengers on public carriers.
Antiquity Act, 1975
The Antiquity Act of 1975 ensures the protection of cultural resources in Pakistan. This
Act is designed to protect antiquities from destruction, theft, negligence, unlawful
excavation, trade and export. Antiquities have been defined in this Act as Ancient
products of human activity, historical sites, sites of anthropological or cultural interest
and national monuments etc.
The law prohibits new construction in the proximity of a protected antiquity and
empowers the government of Pakistan to prohibit excavation in any area that may contain
articles of archaeological significance.
Under this Act, the proponents are obligated to:
Ensure that no activity is under taken in the proximity of a protected antiquity, and
Report any archaeological discovery made during the course of the project to the
Department of Archaeology, Government of Pakistan.
Labor Laws
Labor laws in Pakistan are governed by several legislative tools. However, the principal
labor rights are provided by the constitution of Pakistan. In addition to constitutional
rights, Acts and Ordinances have been enforced for limiting working hours, minimum
working age and conditions of employment. The laws will be applicable to the project
construction contractors.
WAPDA
August 2011
2-5
Article 11(3) of the Constitution of Pakistan prohibits employment of children below the
age of 14 years in any factory, mines or any other hazardous employment. In accordance
with this Article, the Employment of Child Act (ECA) 1991 disallows the child labor in
the country. The ECA defines a child to mean a person who has not completed his/her
fourteenth years of age. The ECA states that no child shall be employed or permitted to
work in any of the occupation set forth in the ECA (such as transport sector, railways,
construction, and ports) or in any workshop wherein any of the processes defined in the
Act is carried out. The processes defined in the Act include carpet weaving, biri (kind of
a cigarette) making, cement manufacturing, textile, construction and others).
Highway Safety Ordinance, 2000
This Ordinance includes provisions for licensing and registration of vehicles and
construction equipment; maintenance of road vehicles; traffic control offences, penalties
and procedures; and the establishment of a police force for motorways and national
highways to regulate and control the traffic as well as keep the highways clear of
encroachments. This Ordinance will have an impact on the road network leading to the
Project area during the construction phase of the project.
Local Government Ordinance, 2001
This Act empowers the Government of Pakistan and provincial governments to enforce
laws for land use; conservation of natural vegetation; air, water, and land pollution;
disposal of solid waste and wastewater effluents; and public health and safety, including
some provisions for environmental protection. Section 93 of this Ordinance pertains to
environmental pollution, under which the local councils are authorized to restrict causing
pollution to air, water or land.
The Pakistan NCS is the principal policy document for environmental issues in the
country, which was developed and approved by the Government of Pakistan on 1 March
1992. The NCS works on a ten-year planning and implementation cycle. It deals with
fourteen core areas, as follows:
Protecting watersheds;
Conserving biodiversity;
WAPDA
August 2011
2-6
Terms of reference for the reports are to be prepared by the project proponents
themselves. The reports must contain baseline data on the Project area, a detailed
assessment thereof, and mitigation measures.
Policy and Procedures for Filing, Review and Approval of Environmental
Assessments, 2000
These policies and procedures define the policy context and the administrative
procedures that govern the environmental assessment process, from the project prefeasibility stage to the approval of the environmental report.
Guidelines for Public Consultation, 1997
The guidelines deal with approaches to public consultation and techniques for designing
an effective program of consultation that reaches out to all major stakeholders and
ensures the incorporation of their concerns in impact assessment.
Guidelines for Sensitive and Critical Areas, 1997
The guidelines identify officially notified protected areas in Pakistan, including critical
ecosystems, archaeological sites, etc., and present checklists for environmental
assessment procedures to be carried out within or near to such sites. Environmentally
sensitive areas include, among others, archaeological sites, biosphere reserves and natural
parks, and wildlife sanctuaries and preserves, none of which are relevant to the Project
area.
WAPDA
August 2011
2-7
Noise standards.
The following NEQS will be relevant to the environmental aspects of the Tarbela 4th
Extension Project1:
Industrial and Municipal Effluents;
Waste Effluents;
Ambient Air;
Motor Vehicle Exhaust and Noise;
Noise; and
Drinking Water Quality Standards.
The PEPC is the highest inter-ministerial statutory body in the country headed by the
Chief Executive and is responsible for:
The PAK-EPA is headed by a Director General and has wide ranging functions as set out
in PEPA 1997. These include preparation and co-ordination of national environmental
policy for approval by PEPC, administering and implementing PEPA 1997 and
preparation, revision or establishment of NEQS. The PAK-EPA has issued regulations
WAPDA
August 2011
2-8
On federal land;
Military projects;
The four provinces, and two regions - Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), and GilgitBaltistan - have their own Environmental Protection Department (EPD) and/or EPAs
which are the provincial/regional level counterparts of the PAK-EPA.
The
provincial/regional EPAs are formed by the respective provincial/regional governments
headed by a Director General who exercises powers delegated to him by the concerned
provincial government. The IEE and EIA reports pertaining to projects falling within the
different provincial/regional boundaries are submitted to the relevant provincial/regional
EPA for approval. For the proposed Project, KP-EPA is the relevant agency for the
approval of the EIA.
2.3
Basel Convention,
Kyoto Protocol,
Montreal Protocol,
Convention concerning the Protection of World Culture and Natural Heritage (World
Heritage Convention), 1972; and
WAPDA
August 2011
2-9
2.4
World Bank
2.4.1 Overview
The World Bank (WB) categorizes development projects according to the type, location,
sensitivity, and scale of the project, as well as the nature and magnitude of its potential
adverse social and environmental impacts.
The environmental impacts of the original Tarbela dam were not separately assessed at
the time of preparation of that project (1965-1970). However, the resettlement issues
were assessed and a Resettlement program developed to resolve the resettlement and
compensation of the Project Affected Persons. There remain some resettlement issues of
the project pending in the courts, which will be addressed under the present project.
The Project has been categorized as Category A requiring a detailed environmental and
social assessment (ESA) and development and implementation of an environmental and
social management plan (ESMP) and a Social Impact Management Framework (SIMF).
For category A projects borrowers must consult with project-affected groups and local
non-governmental organizations about the projects environmental aspects and take their
views into account. Borrowers must (a) initiate consultations as early as possible; (b)
consult groups at least twice (before terms of reference for the assessment are finalized
and once a draft assessment report is prepared); and (c) consult affected groups
throughout project implementation as necessary to address related issues.
Environmental Assessment Sourcebook, Volume I: Policies, Procedures, and CrossSectoral Issues; and
WAPDA
August 2011
2-10
and use by project affected people. Projects must assess potential impacts on biodiversity
and the policy strictly limits circumstances under which conversion or degradation of
natural habitats can occur as well as prohibiting projects which are likely to result in
significant loss of critical natural habitats.
OP 4.09 (Pest Management): rural development and health sector projects have to avoid
using harmful pesticides. Other pesticides can be used, but only as an element of an
Integrated Pest Management Plan that emphasizes environmental and biological controls.
The policy encourages the use of Integrated Pest Management in the whole of the sectors
concerned.
OP 4.10 (Indigenous Peoples): recognizes that indigenous peoples may be exposed to
different types of risks and impacts from development projects. The policy requires
projects to identify whether indigenous peoples are affected by the project and, if so, to
undertake specific consultation activities and to avoid or mitigate impacts on this
potentially vulnerable group.
OP 4.11 (Physical Cultural Resources): sets out the World Bank requirement to avoid or
mitigate adverse impacts resulting from project developments on cultural resources.
There are no cultural or archaeological resources in the vicinity of the Project; hence this
OP will not trigger.
OP 4.12 (Involuntary Resettlement): the World Bank aims to avoid involuntary
resettlement where possible. Where necessary or acquisition of land or other assets is
necessary, the policy sets out requirements for participation in resettlement planning,
mandates compensation for assets at replacement cost, and expects the borrower to see
that incomes and standards of living of affected persons are improved or at least restored
to what they were prior to displacement. The document also identifies the need for a
Resettlement Plan, an abbreviated Resettlement Plan or otherwise.
OP 4.36 (Forests): this policy recognizes the need to reduce deforestation and promote
sustainable forest conservation and management in reducing poverty.
OP 4.37 (Safety on Dams): this policy requires that experienced and competent
professionals design and supervise construction, and that the borrower adopts and
implements dam safety measures through the project cycle. It recommends, where
appropriate, that Bank staff discuss with the borrowers any measures necessary to
strengthen the institutional, legislative, and regulatory frameworks for dam safety
programs in those countries. For large dams, the borrower must engage an independent
Dam Safety Panel.
OP 7.50 (Projects on International Waterways): Projects on International Waterways may affect the relations between the World Bank and its borrowers, and between riparian
states. Therefore, the Bank attaches great importance to the riparian making appropriate
agreements or arrangements for the entire waterway, or parts thereof, and stands ready to
assist in this regard. A borrower must notify other riparian of planned projects that could
affect water quality or quantity, sufficiently far in advance to allow them to review the
plans and raise any concerns or objections.
OP 7.60 (Projects in Disputed Areas): similarly, such projects may affect the relations
between the Bank and its borrowers, and between the claimants to the disputed area.
Therefore, the Bank will only finance projects in disputed areas when either there is no
objection from the other claimant to the disputed area, or when the special circumstances
of the case support Bank financing, notwithstanding the objection.
WAPDA
August 2011
2-11
BP 17.50 (Public Disclosure of Information): This BP deals with the World Bank policy
on disclosure of information. It is a mandatory procedure to be followed by the borrower
and Bank and supports public access to information on environmental and social aspects
of projects.
Triggered
Not
Comments
Triggered
Environmental
Assessment
OP/BP/GP 4.01
Natural Habitats
OP/BP 4.04
Pest
Management
OP 4.09
Indigenous
Peoples
OP 4.20/OP 4.10
Physical Cultural
Resources
OP 4.11
Involuntary
Resettlement
OP/BP 4.12
Forests
OP/BP 4.36
Safety of Dams
OP/BP 4.37
WAPDA
August 2011
2-12
Directive
Policy
Triggered
Not
Comments
Triggered
upgrade the monitoring system of the
Dam, the monitoring of the movement of
sediment delta in the reservoir, and
associated early warning system.
Projects in
International
Waterways
OP/BP/GP 7.50
Projects in
Disputed Areas
OP/BP/GP 7.60
Public Disclosure
of Information
BP 17.50
Government
Pakistan
of
Pakistan Environmental
(GoP)
Protection Act,
1997
EIA guidelines
for Power
Projects
International
treaties
Disclosure of
projects
Early screening
and Scoping
Participatory
approach
Integrate
environmental
World Bank
WAPDA
August 2011
2-13
Legislation /
Policy
assessment (EA)
and social
assessment (SA)
documents
Risk assessment
Climate Change
and floods
Alternatives
Pollution
Physical and
Cultural
Resources
Verification
implemented
with
Department
of
Archaeology
Gender
Public Health
Consultation and
Information
Disclosure
group
WAPDA
August 2011
2-14
3 Project Description
3.1
The Tarbela Dam is located on the Indus River in the KP Province of Pakistan at a
distance of about 70 km from the capital Islamabad. Figure 3.1 shows a satellite
photograph from the Dam and the Project area. The construction of the dam was
completed in 1976. It has a reservoir area of approximately 260 km2 and approximately
33,200 ha of land was acquired for its construction. The main objectives of the Tarbela
Dam Project were to provide: regulated water supply for irrigation; substantial supplies
of hydroelectric power, and a measure of flood control by storing snowmelt and monsoon
flows of the Indus River. Releases from the Tarbela Reservoir are made primarily in
response to irrigation demand with power generation being a secondary benefit.
The 124 m high and approximately 2.4 km long dam was designed to impound
13,700 Mm3 of water and provide 11,500 Mm3 of live storage. Two spillways were
provided at the left abutment, with capacities sufficient to handle double the largest flood
volume on record. Four tunnels, each 13.73 m in diameter at the upstream end, were
excavated in the right abutment to divert the flow of the river. Three of these tunnels
were intended to serve as power intakes, each to serve a separate generating unit. The
fourth tunnel was to serve as a permanent irrigation outlet. Tunnel 5 was excavated
between the left abutment and the auxiliary dam as a further irrigation tunnel. The three
generating units presently have total installed capacity of 3,478 MW comprising
10 turbines of 175 MW each and four turbines of 432 MW each.
3.2
The main objective of the Project is to utilize the existing irrigation Tunnel 4 of the
Tarbela Dam Project to supply water to a new power station to augment the power supply
to the country. A main requirement of the Project is that the new scheme does not affect
the ability of the Tarbela Dam Project to provide water for irrigation or other purposes.
The subsequent sections present an overview of the key project elements, followed by a
description of the key project components and their associated activities. The project
description concludes with the project program.
3.3
Salient Features
The salient features of the Project are as detailed below in Table 3.1.
3.4
Project Components
In the following sub sections an overview is provided of the key components of the
Project including: (i) Intake Arrangements; (ii) Penstock Connection; (iii) Powerhouse;
(iv) Mechanical and Electrical Plant; (v) Switchyard; (vi) Transmission Lines; and (vii)
Tailrace. In Figure 3.2 a simple schematic of a hydro scheme is given to demonstrate
how each of the Project components fit together.
WAPDA
August 2011
3-1
Figure 3.1:
Source:
WAPDA
August 2011
Google Earth
3-2
Table 3.1:
Parameter
Detail
Tunnel 4
Location
Tunnel 4 runs from the intake and through the right abutment of the
dam for approximately 900 m. The downstream control structure is
connected to the tunnel at the portal in the rock face. The control
structure is located between the foot of a steep slope to the west and
the Tunnel 3 control structure to the east.
Purpose
Type
Irrigation releases when reservoirs level falls below the spillway level
Concrete/Steel Lined
Cross Section
Length
Circular 13.7 m 11 m
914 m
Outlet Type
Flip Bucket
Intake Level
To be confirmed
Design Flow
Proposed Powerhouse
Location
Type of Turbine
Number of Units
Three
470 MW
1,410 MW
Type of Generator
Vertical Shaft
Generating Voltage
18 kV or 20 kV
327.6 m
3,871 GWh
Tailrace Channel
Not applicable as water flows directly from turbines to Ghazi Barotha
Length
head pond
Type
Not applicable
T4CJV
WAPDA
August 2011
3-3
Figure 3.2:
Source:
Examine the possibility of providing a raised level of water entry for the intake at
Tunnel 4; and
Review and examine appropriate intake arrangements for Tunnel 4, this may include
possible modifications and/or recommendation at upstream structures or any other
arrangement from the existing intake of Tunnel 4 and installation of trash racks.
The Intake Options Report was issued in January 2011 and it presents a convincing case
for a raised shaft intake (Option 2) to be taken forward. Thorough analysis led to the
conclusions that it would provide more operational flexibility and better performance in
terms of head loss while being the most cost effective and having the shortest
construction period of all the options.
Intake Option 2
Intake Option 2 consists of a raised intake situated on the hillside over Tunnel 4 with a
shaft connection into the upstream part of the tunnel. The proposed level for the intake to
be constructed is 415 m, as shown in Figure 3.3.
WAPDA
August 2011
3-4
Figure 3.3:
Existing Intake
WAPDA
August 2011
3-5
The low level intake would be retained and operated until such time as it is blocked with
sediment or until the minimum reservoir level has increased such that there is sufficient
submergence for operation of the raised intake. When the lower intake is no longer
viable a profiled concrete plug will be constructed in the tunnel to isolate the original
intake.
The proposed arrangement places the intake 5.5 m below the current lowest water level
and a cofferdam (formed by delaying excavation) can be used to control water inflow into
the shaft area during construction.
The depth of excavation and dewatering required during construction, as well as the
geology of the rock, will dictate the level at which the intake can be constructed.
Figure 3.4 shows the geological information along the centerline of Tunnel 4 and the
proposed raised intake would be located into the hillside and directly above Tunnel 4 so
the shaft can be formed within an area where tunneling conditions are expected to be
good.
Further Work
Further study is being carried out to finalize the elevation of the intake in order to
minimize the excavation and match the expected future sediment and operation levels.
The success of the proposed design is dependent upon the rock conditions and a
significant investigation is underway to ensure that the shaft will not fall within the poor
quality limestone that exists close to the proposed location.
Figure 3.4:
Source:
WAPDA, Tarbela Dam Project Drawing Number 52PK1663 R1, Intake Area, Geologic Sections, Tunnel 3 and 4
Centerline
WAPDA
August 2011
3-6
two separate arrangements, the bulkhead gate (and its upstream stoplog) in the tunnel and
the radial gates in the Outlet Control Structure. The radial gates are used to regulate the
flow of irrigation water from the reservoir although they are only operated either fully
open or closed. When the radial gates are closed it has been normal practice to also close
the upstream bulkhead gate.
Tunnel 4 runs from the intake through the right abutment of the dam for approximately
2.7 km. The downstream control structure is connected to the tunnel at the portal in the
rock face. The control structure is located between the foot of a steep slope to the west
and the Tunnel 3 control structure to the east. There is limited space to locate a new
branch near this structure to connect it to the power house. In order to minimize
interference with the control structure the new branch arrangement would need to be
located upstream of the existing bifurcation. However, the available space is limited by
the slopes to the north and west. The tunnel portal could potentially be cut back onto the
slope, but this would need to be limited to avoid significant excavation that may affect
slope stability. Designs have been developed to minimize interference with the existing
control structure and where possible to minimize cutting back the slopes.
The Project will require water to be diverted from the existing irrigation tunnel to the new
powerhouse. This new arrangement will be designed so that the irrigation capacity of
Tunnel 4 will be unaffected. Several options were considered in the analysis; they are
discussed in Chapter 4. Figure 3.5 shows the selected arrangement of penstock
connection and the powerhouse location.
Figure 3.5:
Source: T4CJV
WAPDA
August 2011
3-7
The primary requirements of the proposed powerhouse are that it has to be downstream
of the dam and connected to Tunnel 4 and to be out of the spray of water when the outlet
radial gates are in operation. From these requirements, the powerhouse would be
constrained to either upstream of the chutes from the outlet gates or far enough
downstream to be unaffected by spray during its operation. The short timescale of this
project means there were significant restrictions to the amount work that could be done to
find an optimum location for the powerhouse. The alternative sites considered and the
assessment process that led to the decision on final location are outlined in Section 4.2.4
and shown in Figure 3.6. Location C has finally been selected for the powerhouse.
Figure 3.6:
Source: T4CJV
The head level at Tarbela is 104.2 m with a flow of 1,450 m3/s, the proposed turbine type
is the vertical Francis, which is the most commonly used type of turbine and has high
head and flow operational ranges. Following optimization of the unit rating by cost
analysis, it was decided that three 470 MW turbines will offer the highest rate of return.
This rating is also similar to turbines at the 3rd Extension, with the notable difference
being the rotational speed.
The speed selected for the Project is 107.14 rotations per minute (rpm) which is higher
than the 90.9 rpm at the 3rd Extension. The higher speed for the Project means that
smaller components can be used for the turbine and the overall dimensions of the
powerhouse kept to a minimum. However with the increase in speed the submergence of
the turbine will be greater to ensure that there is no cavitation damage. Currently the
speed selected is a compromise between the excavation depth and the powerhouse
WAPDA
August 2011
3-8
Figure 3.8:
Existing
Slope
Outlet Control
Source:
T4CJV
The largest component to be transported to site would be the turbine runner. The
diameter of this will be the same as the inlet diameter of the turbine at around 7 m. The
WAPDA
August 2011
3-9
runner and guide vanes will be fabricated using martensitic stainless steel. The guide
vanes will be supported on a bearing from the head cover and seals will be fitted to
prevent the ingress of water and solid materials into the bearings. The guide vanes will
be used in conjunction with a hydraulically governed regulating ring mounted on the
head cover of the turbine with tilting type guide bearing. A shaft seal will be installed
between the turbine/runner coupling and the turbine bearing and held in place by springs
or compressed air. The spiral casing is expected to be manufactured on site from rolled
plate components.
To date, the existing turbines at Tarbela have not been significantly affected by effects of
erosion from the passage of aggressive sediments. However, erosion is likely to be more
significant for these units due to the higher speed of the turbine and the increase of
sediment passing through the reservoir from the build-up. To mitigate for this, it is
proposed that hard coatings will be considered for the turbine parts that are more
susceptible to damage.
Inlet and Relief Valves
The installation of the main inlet valves will minimize water leakage when the turbines
are shut down and also facilitate for the dewatering of a single unit for maintenance
without effects on the operation of other generating units connected to the penstock. The
main inlet valves will be located outside the powerhouse structure to minimize the crane
span and powerhouse size. It is likely that the 7.5 m diameter valve will be transported in
parts and reassembled on site. For the proposed turbines the two types of valve have
been considered: a ring gate and a butterfly valve. It was thought that a ring gate would
have limited application in respect of the aspects of maintenance and inspection as well
as other disadvantages such as:
Larger spiral casing and potentially increase the size of the powerhouse; and
It was for these reasons the butterfly valves were chosen. These valves would have a
double lattice structure and be operated by twin servomotors. Valve closing will be
accomplished either via counterweights or double acting servomotors.
In order to limit pressure rise in the penstock in the event of load reduction or unit/station
trips, Howell Bunger relief valves will be installed on each turbine with an extra one on a
common branch and independent of the turbines to allow one relief valve to act as a back
up to another. These valves will open to allow the rate of flow reduction in the penstock
to be minimized when load is thrown off.
3.4.5 Switchyard
The existing 500 kV switchyard is in breaker and a half formation which means that for
three generators two bays of switchgear are required, one bay with three circuit breakers
and the other with two. However due to the layout of the switchyard the area will have to
be extended by three bay widths in order to bring three connections in from the new
powerhouse. The switchyard will therefore be extended by bays 19, 20 and 21. This will
mean that the switchyard perimeter wall will have to be moved but at this stage a survey
of the existing available ground is required before it can be determined whether further
reclamation is required or not. It is however estimated that the length of the extension
will be approximately 75 m.
WAPDA
August 2011
3-10
Constructing a new switchyard on the Right Bank was also considered, assessment into
the feasibility of this alternative is discussed in Section 4.2.5.
3.4.7 Tailrace
It will be necessary to excavate the existing plunge pool to provide a smooth discharge
path for the water leaving the turbines. It is expected that a cofferdam will be constructed
such that the excavation for the powerhouse and the tailrace can be undertaken, hopefully
within a single season.
3.5
Other Components
About 100 barracks are available for labor camp on the Left Bank but all of these need
major repair. These barracks were previously used during the original construction of the
Tarbela Dam project and are very derelict with doors, windows and roofs in need of
replacement. In addition, water supply lines, sewerage and electricity would need to be
installed and the area around the barracks cleared from the overgrowth and shrubbery.
There are however sufficient numbers of barracks available that could be used following
appropriate refurbishment.
Option 2 Right Bank
About twenty barracks are also available on the Right Bank Colony which were used as
labor camp during the construction of Ghazi Barotha Barrage. The condition of these
barracks is similar to those on the Left Bank.
In addition there are around 15 houses adjacent to these barracks, which are presently
residences of WAPDA employees. In order to use these barracks, the occupants of these
houses would have to be moved to 26 vacant houses available in Right Bank Colony.
The houses would require renovation and the surplus could be used as residences for the
consultants staff.
WAPDA
August 2011
3-11
There would be inputs of different types including food stuff, utility items and personal
belongings and outputs would include the solid and liquid wastes produced from the
camps.
Machinery and Vehicles
The following list outlines the major machinery and vehicles that are envisaged to be
required for the project construction works:
Machinery and vehicles needed for construction
Hydraulic excavators
Refueling car
Welding machine 30 kW
Dump trucks
Water tanker
Vibratory roller
Water pump
Submersible pump
Motor grader
Tower crane
Fork lifter
Bulldozer
Mobile crane
Wheel loader
Air compressor
Diving Equipment
Tractor
Work boat
Transit mixer
The remnants of the main concrete mixing plant from the construction of Tarbela Dam
are still evident today. Spoil dumps are also visible on the terrace and along the river
bank cut face. The sources of aggregate for the concrete during construction are as
follows:
Coarse Aggregate procured from the river bed through dredging; and
Fine Aggregate sand can be obtained from the Left Bank quarry near the Sobra
Colony.
It is anticipated that both of these sources can provide the required materials in sufficient
quantities, the quantities required are still being calculated by the Design Team.
However, with the construction of Ghazi Barotha, the water level in the river valley has
been elevated therefore making excavation of coarse aggregate from the river bed more
difficult.
If required core material in particular silt and clay, can be procured from the Gandaf area
in the west/northwest of Tarbela Dam. The Gandaf area is about 15 to 20 km from
Tarbela and a tunnel across the ridge was built for the easy and quick transportation of
WAPDA
August 2011
3-12
the core material. Presently the Gandaf area has been developed into an industrial area;
however, the available terraces can be explored for this type of core material.
The rip rap/stone pitching material was previously obtained mainly through the required
excavations from tunnels and spillways. Limestone from spillways was used as rip rap in
the upstream slope, while the carbonaceous schist material of metamorphic nature was
used in the downstream side of the embankment.
Currently, it appears that these sources will not provide any material, however the nearby
areas can be studied for this purpose.
Potential Material Sources
As well as the major quarry areas discussed above, the following areas have been
identified as alternative sources for the aggregates for the concrete:
Coarse Aggregate potential suitable areas for sandy gravel material include the deltaic
and island areas that presently exist. The water bay area downstream of the Right Bank
has also been proposed and the quartzite rock crops along the road extending to the river
is deemed to be sound and durable in nature for use;
Fine Aggregate the sand from Qibla-Bandi and Lawrancepur, nearly 30 to 40 km
respectively from the Right Bank, can provide good sources that are well established,
recognized and well studied and have been used previously in the Ghazi Barotha
Hydropower Project;
Core Material some potential terraces for silt and clay are likely to be identified in the
Gandaf area industrial zone. The ultimate decision on the source will be determined by
the potential environmental and social impacts;
Rip Rap / Slope Protection and Pitching Material the required excavation for the
powerhouse and penstock construction will provide quartzite to be used as rip rap for the
upstream slope and the graphitic schist in the near vicinity can provide pitching stone on
the downstream side.
Alkali Silica Reaction (ASR) Potential
From the existing concrete structures, the coarse aggregate from the Indus River and the
fine aggregate (Lawrancepur sand) have proven to be as potentially reactive to Ordinary
Portland Cement (OPC). However, studies and testing can be done to determine the ratio
of OPC to slag cement to control the reactive nature of the aggregates.
Alternatively, the nearby cement factories can provide low alkali cement on demand,
while pozzolon sources have not been established thus far in Pakistan.
WAPDA
August 2011
3-13
3.6
The original program for the project assumed a construction period of four years
(48 months). This was for the 960 MW scheme proposed in the 1992 Inception Report
and possibly assumed that the project would be awarded as a variation to the 3rd
Extension project that was ongoing at the time the report was written. The project has
now been reviewed and the installed capacity will be larger with three instead of two
turbines.
Furthermore, it will be necessary to enter into a new set of contracts and complete a new
set of plant designs and this is likely to lead to some increase in construction time. The
preliminary construction schedules indicate the first turbine generator could be completed
within just over four years. The power station will now be completed between four and a
half to five years after.
For the Project it is likely that the overall construction program (see Figure 3.11) will be
controlled by the mechanical and electrical works. An outline for construction periods
has been obtained from Alstom for a two unit station and they consider that the following
periods would be appropriate:
Supply Unit 1: 40 months;
Supply Unit 2: 43 months;
Install/Commission Unit 1: 13 months; and
Install/Commission Unit 2: 13 months.
This gives total time for operation of the first machine of 53 months and the second
machine of 56 months.
A third machine could be expected three months later i.e. 59 months following award of
contract. This implies that first generation will be some five months later than had
previously been envisaged with the last machine coming on line nearly five years
following the notice to proceed.
WAPDA
August 2011
3-14
Source:
T4CJV
WAPDA
August 2011
3-15
Source:
T4CJV
WAPDA
August 2011
3-16
Source:
T4CJV
WAPDA
August 2011
3-17
The civil work program has been developed independently from the above and it is
estimated that the Power Station will be sufficiently advanced to start turbine erection
some 26 months after the issuing of the Notice to Proceed. This will tie in well with the
probable start of delivery of the first turbine components.
Once the first turbine draft tube is complete, it will be embedded and the concrete will
form a base for spiral casing erection. Once the spiral casing has been completed and
pressure tested the concrete works will continue upwards to form the generator
foundations and the area will then be returned to the Mechanical and Electrical
Contractors to allow them to erect the turbine internals and the generators. Each unit will
proceed at roughly 3 month intervals.
The program envisaged is similar to that followed in many other large hydroelectric
power stations and it is not expected to present any major difficulties. It might be
possible to save some time but it is almost certain that it will be necessary to perform a
full turbine model test and based upon previous experience it is considered that the
indicative program put forward by Alstom is not unreasonable.
Switchyard and 500 kV Connections Civil Works
Assuming the studies confirm that the best solution is to simply extend the existing
facilities it will be necessary to extend the 500 kV switchyard to accommodate the new
switchgear bays and the associated incoming lines from the power station. It is proposed
to use material from the powerhouse/intake excavation to extend the switchyard as this
will reduce the quantity of material that has to be disposed of elsewhere.
It is expected that the connection between the new powerhouse and the extended
switchyard will be by 500 kV transmission lines although alternative methods are being
considered. It will be necessary to construct transmission towers within the tailrace but it
is understood that the facilities exist in Pakistan for tower construction in rivers and
similar areas. Therefore no problem is expected with this work. The time available to
complete the switchyard civil works and the equipment installation is more than adequate
and these works are not expected to be on the critical path for the project.
Penstock and Associated Civil Works
Before the erection of the penstock can begin it will be necessary to excavate a very
significant trench to accommodate the pipeline. It will also be necessary to cut back the
rock face behind the existing portal and also to the west of the existing outlet control
structure. Significant slope support works are also expected to be required. It is proposed
that the civil contractor will complete the majority of these works in advance of penstock
construction. Construction of the penstock will proceed in sections leaving the
connection to the exit from Tunnel 4 as late as possible to allow it to remain in service to
release irrigation flows for the maximum period possible.
3.7
The total project cost is about US$ 909 million. The cost estimates include physical
contingencies, price contingencies based on international inflation, taxes and duties on
civil works on imported machines, turbines and generators, and Interest During
Construction (IDC) of US$83.5 million assuming IBRD and IDA terms for the loan.The
Project cost by component is provided in the Table 3-2.
WAPDA
August 2011
3-18
WAPDA
August 2011
156.2
63.5
89.9
309.6
133.6
54.3
76.9
264.8
377.6
53.9
431.5
323.9
46.3
370.2
15.0
2.0
6.0
5.0
28.0
15.0
2.0
6.0
5.0
28.0
24.0
2.4
26.4
21.0
2.4
23.4
13.0
2.0
15.0
30.0
825.5
0.0
0.0
83.5
909.0
90.8
13.0
2.0
15.0
30.0
716.4
60.6
48.5
83.5
909.0
3-19
4.1.1 Overview
The waters of the Indus basin begin in the Himalayan Mountains and run a course
through the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The river enters Pakistan in the Karakorum
mountains in Gilgit-Baltistan (a self governed region of Pakistan) and after flowing in a
westerly direction turns southward through the entire length of the country, converging
and emptying into the Arabian Sea to the southeast of Karachi. Following the partition of
Pakistan and India, development over the last century has seen a series of barrages and
link canals built to transfer water from the Indus and Jhelum to supply the water to the
southern parts of the country. These barrages include Tarbela and Mangla Dams. This
system currently provides water for more than 26 million acres of land, representing the
largest irrigated area of any one river system in the world.
13%
17%
13%
Identified
Feasibility Study Completed
Design and Construction Stage
In Operation
57%
Source:
T4CJV
WAPDA
August 2011
4-1
Source:
With a population in excess of 169 million as of 2009, the economy of Pakistan is the
27th largest in the world. Agriculture is one of the main sectors of the country and the
backbone of the economy and therefore a secure supply of water for irrigation purposes is
crucial. Snowmelt in the summer from the Himalayan and Karakorum glaciers provides
a high flow of water in the Indus and a small portion of this is stored in Tarbela and
Mangla for the winter release. This allows for two irrigated crops to be harvested
annually a winter/early spring crop (rabi season) and a summer crop (kharif or wet
season). The capacity of Tarbela Reservoir is decreasing as a result of continued
sedimentation although at a much lower rate than originally predicted.
The Kalabagh Dam to be constructed on the Indus River in western Punjab could provide
the much needed additional storage to ensure the continuation of a constant water supply.
However, so far this project has not been pursued despite the completion of designs. It is
clear that sediment management is an important issue to maintain the storage capacity of
the existing reservoirs in future. The proposed Diamer Basha Dam 315 km upstream of
Tarbela would significantly reduce the amount of sediment inflow as well as allowing
Tarbela to maintain a high reservoir level for longer periods of time, allowing for more
effective operation of the dam.
With increased urbanization and industrialization the shortage of power in the country is
growing. Extensive load shedding is felt by all communities in the country which results
in a slower rate of increase in consumption than most developed or developing countries.
Development Policy
In 1958, WAPDA was established to develop and operate the majority of the hydropower
in Pakistan while private hydro developments have been possible under the auspices of
the Private Power and Infrastructure Board (PPIB) since 1994. WAPDA however
remains the main body developing Pakistans hydropower resources.
WAPDA
August 2011
4-2
The current total hydropower generation capacity in Pakistan is around 6,500 MW with a
further 1,500 MW under construction. Schemes that are either under study, ready for
construction or identified as future projects represent a combined potential power
generation of 41,729 MW. There are currently 28 projects ongoing to either extend or
construct schemes to increase power generation capacity. These projects span until 2030
and would offer a combined total of 36,111 MW.
The Gross Domestic Product of Pakistan amounts to USD 162 billion as of 2009 with
USD 70.8 billion allocated as funds for all development programs in the country. With
large hydropower projects costing in the region of USD 1-2 billion per MW installed, the
28 projects would require USD 36-72 billion. Although the need for additional power
has been clearly demonstrated, it is also clear that the development of these schemes is
unlikely to proceed as quickly as the population may prefer. However, it can be
anticipated that if the Diamer Basha project moves ahead, and its implementation goes
smoothly, then it is likely that the next major scheme will follow within five to 10 years,
any earlier would put a huge strain on the local infrastructure and resources.
The need for additional generating capacity in Pakistan is clearly demonstrated by the
data provided in Table 4.1 and Table 4.2. In Figure 4.3 it is evident that that the current
generating capability is 16,804 MW in the summer and 12,840 MW in the winter, when
hydro capability is reduced. Table 4.1 shows that the current Pakistan Electric Power
Company (PEPCO) demand, including 700 MW exported to the Karachi Electric Supply
Company (KESC) is 20,151 MW. This data would indicate a current shortfall of
7,311 MW in the winter and 3,347 MW in the summer.
Demand Forecast Assumptions
Table 4.1 contains the predicted increase in demand for electrical power up until 2030.
These are based upon an approximate 8% per annum increase in demand by the
distribution companies (DISCOS).
No seasonal variations in the data are accounted for in Table 4.1 and it is clear that there
are significant variations in demand caused by the need for space heating and air
conditioning.
In Figure 4.3 the National Transmission and Dispatch Company (NTDC) data has been
adjusted to take account of the seasonal changes in generation capacity. These results
indicate that during the winter season there will be insufficient generation to fulfill
demand through the period considered. However, during the summer season generating
capacity should exceed demand in the period 2014-15. It should of course be borne in
mind that generation capability rarely meets the installed capacity as plant will be out of
service due to planned and forced outages and that the development of some of the plants
included in the planting program are behind schedule.
WAPDA
August 2011
4-3
Table 4.1:
Name
2009-
2010-
2011-
2012-
2013-
2014-
2015-
2016-
2017-
2018-
2019-
2020-
2021-
2022-
2023-
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
3970
4271
4609
4982
5466
5820
6224
6521
7006
7605
8253
8940
9668
10448
11268
1840
1985
2137
2300
2473
2654
2844
2980
3201
3475
3771
4085
4417
4774
5149
2608
2832
3061
3305
3603
3938
4296
4501
4836
5249
5696
6170
6673
7212
7778
2084
2290
2507
2719
2936
3153
3385
3547
3810
4136
4488
4862
5258
5683
6128
2622
2858
3116
3398
3706
4044
4412
4623
4966
5391
5850
6337
6853
7407
7988
PESCO
2372
2587
2832
3104
3406
3635
3881
4066
4368
4742
5146
5574
6028
6515
7026
1855
1988
2131
2288
2461
2650
2959
2996
3218
3494
3791
4106
4441
4800
5176
1107
1173
1244
1319
1399
1483
1573
1648
1771
1922
2086
2259
2443
2641
2848
752
809
869
934
1004
1079
1160
1215
1306
1417
1538
1666
1802
1947
2100
19210
20793
22506
24349
26454
28456
30634
32098
34482
37433
40618
44000
47583
51426
55461
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
18105
19598
21214
22950
24935
26820
28875
30255
32502
35284
38286
41474
44851
48474
52276
665
720
779
843
916
985
1061
1112
1194
1296
1407
1524
1648
1781
1921
18770
20318
21993
23793
25851
27805
29936
31367
33696
36580
39693
42997
46498
50254
54197
Company (HESCO)
Quetta Electric Supply Company
(QESCO)
Tribal Electric Supply Company
(TESCO)
DISCOs Demand (undiversified)
Diversity Factor
DISCOs Demand (diversified)
T&T Losses (500 & 220kV)
NTDC Demand
WAPDA
August 2011
4-4
Name
Auxiliary Consumption
PEPCO Demand w/o Export to
2009-
2010-
2011-
2012-
2013-
2014-
2015-
2016-
2017-
2018-
2019-
2020-
2021-
2022-
2023-
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
681
737
798
863
938
1008
1086
1138
1222
1327
1440
1559
1686
1823
1966
19451
21055
22791
24656
26788
28813
31022
32504
34918
37907
41132
44557
48185
52077
56163
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
700
20151
21755
23491
25356
27488
29513
31722
33204
35618
38607
41832
45257
48885
52777
56863
WAPDA
August 2011
4-5
Table 4.2:
Sr.
No.
Fuel
Summer
Winter
3478
3521
1101
Mangla
1000
1014
409
Ghazi Barotha
1450
1405
580
Warsak
243
171
145
184
91
48
Small Hydro
69
64
20
6444
Gas/FO
850
700
Gas
174
140
1024
840
FO
640
270
10
Gas
1015
885
11
TPS Quetta
Gas
35
Thermal (GENCOs)
1180
Gas/FO
1350
1130
13
Gas/FO
195
60
14
Gas/HSD
244
210
15
FO
132
100
Shandra GT
Gas
17
Nuc
25
1690
12
Hydel
2303
16
18
FBC Lakhra
Coal
44
30
1965
1530
150
30
150
30
4829
3580
11273
Nuclear Plants
325
9846
5883
300
11598
19
Jagran Hydro
30
30
20
Malakand-III Hydro
81
81
Thermal
6266
Public Sector
Capability (MW)
(MW)
Private Sector
Installed
Capacity)
Tarbela
Hydro
10146
6183
111
111
21
KAPCO
Gas/FO
1638
1386
22
FO
1292
1200
23
FO
131
124
24
FO
362
350
25
FO
365
350
26
FO
135
119
27
Gas
140
129
28
Gas
586
551
(SEPCOL)
29
FO
450
395
30
Gas
157
151
31
FO
134
125
32
FO
135
120
WAPDA
August 2011
4-6
Installed
Capability (MW)
Fuel
33
Gas
34
Gas
31
31
35
Attock Generation PP
FO
163
156
36
ATLAS Power
Gas
219
219
37
Gas
227
217
38
RFO/Gas
225
225
39
RFO/Gas
225
225
40
RFO
200
200
7050
6484
41
No.
Capacity)
(MW)
Summer
235
Winter
211
62
62
62
7112
6546
62
7223
6657
6555
12226
6377
2414
10426
Private)
Total (PEPCO System)
Source:
18821
16803
12840
Figure 4.3:
Climate Change
4-7
by a strong credible body of evidence, is that the climate is changing and that it is largely
down to human actions.
The current discussions are focused on stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the
atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the
climate system. Carbon dioxide (CO2) is considered to be the most important of the
greenhouse gasses and accounts for the around 60% of the enhanced greenhouse effect.
The concentrations in the atmosphere increased from approximately 280 parts per million
(ppm) in pre-industrial times to 382 ppm in 2006, representing a 36% increase.
Production of electricity from fossil fuels is considered to be a major source of CO2
emissions. As of 2007, total installed power capacity in Pakistan was 19,505 MW, of
which 65% originates from fossil fuels, 2% from nuclear and the remaining 33% from
hydro.
To meet the increased demand for electricity as highlighted in Section 4.1.4, the potential
of hydropower and its inherent benefits cannot be neglected.
Advantages of Hydropower
Hydropower is already a major contributor for world electricity. A modern plant like
Tarbela is capable of converting the available energy in water to electricity with
efficiency in excess of 90%. Provided the environmental, ecological and social / political
effects are well understood, hydro schemes offer some very desirable characteristics for a
power plant.
Hydro schemes can supply electricity without unpredictable network input variations and
offer the potential for rapid response to changing energy demands because the water can
be released at short notice. The input of power can match the annual variations in
demand because water can be stored for a length of time.
Technologies associated with hydropower are well established and can be very reliable.
Of the capital costs for a hydro scheme, 80% is typically attributed to civil works. For a
scheme like Tarbela where the dam is already in existence, construction costs will be
comparatively very low and hence the rate of return very high particularly given the long
life expectancy that is typical for hydro schemes.
Needs Case and the Project Objectives
Presently in Pakistan only 65 70% of the population has access to electricity and the
Government is committed to provide electricity access to all households in the minimum
possible time. The country is currently facing extensive power shortages. The present
electricity demand-supply gap, coupled with consistent growth in demand (7-8% per
annum), clearly indicates the critical need for enhancing the countrys current power
generation capability.
The power shortfall situation is being tackled through load management by shedding and
supplying power to various areas and sectors on a rotation basis. Hence industries,
services and businesses are directly affected with some being shut down or running at far
less than optimum for periods of time.
The power generated from the Project will be supplied to the national grid for further
transmission to various load centers to augment existing supplies. The additional
generation will help to meet the existing demand for electricity. It may also support the
establishment of new enterprises, which could boost commercial and economic activities
WAPDA
August 2011
4-8
and enhance job opportunities in the country. The Project proposes to add 1,410 MW of
additional generation to the existing 3,478 MW capacity at Tarbela.
4.2
Assessment of Alternatives
4.2.1 Overview
This chapter discusses the alternative considerations that have been studied for the
Project. The analysis of alternatives compares feasible options to various sources and
designs that would have a similar outcome. The analysis includes consideration of the
no project option followed by a discussion on design alternatives.
Shortfall (MW)
Summer
16,804
3,347
Winter
12,840
7,311
With the production of an additional 1,410 MW the T4HP project will substantially
contribute in closing the gap between demand and supply of power in the country.
Moreover no other non-hydro alternatives exist which can provide electricity so low in
cost, clean and from renewable resources. Another advantage is that the project can be
completed within five years, since most of the infrastructure is already in place.
The Tarbela Hydropower 4th Extension Project Inception Report (1992) proposed
location for the powerhouse was downstream from the outlet gates on an area of waste
ground that had previously supported a concrete batching plant during construction of the
main project. During present studies further locations are considered as alternate sites for
powerhouse construction, including building the powerhouse underground. Locations of
all the above ground sites are shown in Figures 4.4 and 4.5.
WAPDA
August 2011
4-9
Figure 4.4:
Source: T4CJV
WAPDA
August 2011
4-10
Figure 4.5:
Location A1
Location A2
Location B1/B2
Location C
Final Location
Source: T4CJV
WAPDA
August 2011
4-11
Location C has been selected as the powerhouse location and a brief description of the
other potential powerhouse sites and the reasons for their non-selection is provided in the
following sub-sections.
Table 4.4 below provides a summary of the technical, economical and environmental
criteria for each of the alternative site locations.
Table 4.4:
Site
Location A1
Economical Criteria
Environmental Criteria
Minimal excavation
would likely be needed.
and head-loss
extension.
implications
A shorter penstock
founded on rock
Right
and excavation
Location B2
Extensive excavation in
sedimentary rock
powerhouse is
other locations
No slope cutting or
penstock. Reduced
excavation. no need to
Tunnel 4.
construction complexity
and risk associated with
slope cutting; additional
energy potential due to
lower head losses in
new penstock.
Source:
MML
WAPDA
August 2011
4-12
Location A1
This location is downstream of the outlet gates of Tunnel 4 and provides a relatively clear
route out for the transmission line connection to the proposed extension of the existing
500 kV switchyard. However, the location requires a long penstock with cost and headloss implications. It is likely that much of the powerhouse foundations would be located
on loose fill (from previous work of an old concrete batching plant and tunnel spoil)
located on alluvium generally below the water table, involving a significant amount of
dewatering. At this location ensuring the excavation remains dry and stable would be
significantly more difficult than for excavations at the other locations where the
foundations are rock.
Although there should be little difficulty in constructing the powerhouse in this location,
as the 3rd Extension location had enjoyed similar foundation conditions, T4CJV
considered that a location closer to the Tunnel 4 outlet would be economically more
feasible.
Location A2
Location A2 was considered to have two key advantages over location A1; the
powerhouse would be founded on rock and the penstock would be shorter than for A1.
There are some concerns however that it would be too close to the discharge from the
outlet gates and therefore subject to excessive spray.
Location B2
Locations B2 is relatively further away from the outlet gates. This location would
significantly shorten the length of the penstock between the Tunnel 4 outlet and the
powerhouse. Location B2 would have required the penstock to be run in a Tunnel
through sedimentary rocks that had previously suffered from instability.
Location B1 would require the shorter penstock compared to the locations mentioned
above. However, the penstock would be founded over existing concrete structures which
would require considerable excavation into the slope. It was for this reason that location
B2 was discarded.
Underground Powerhouse
An underground powerhouse would potentially have been feasible with the cavern
upstream of locations B1 and B2. Although such arrangements would have minimized
the impact upon the road it was not pursued further as there were no clear advantages and
it was considered that, following earlier stability issues, it was likely that the rock quality
was not adequate for such a large excavation.
Location C
Location C provides direct connection to the Tunnel 4, is the best option, and is selected
for the Project. Recent operational information has shown that Tunnel 4 is no longer
used to release significant water flows and this has been confirmed by flow routing
studies that have looked at future operation for nearly fifty years. The emergency
drawdown facility can be provided by Tunnel 5 that was not included in the original
design. It has therefore been concluded that the only remaining need for Tunnel 4 outlet
gates is to provide a flushing facility if the tunnel intakes should become blocked. There
will be overall cost saving (in the order of US$ 50 million) if the existing outlet structure
is demolished and a new set of gates constructed as part of the new powerhouse complex.
The benefits of this arrangement are: (a) reduced capital costs due to savings in
WAPDA
August 2011
4-13
excavation for penstock and powerhouse; (b) reduced construction risks as no need to
modify existing slopes; (c) additional energy potential due to lower head losses in new
penstock; (d) no need to relocate the existing road; (e) it will be possible to incorporate
isolating gates within the new release facility.
The only potential drawback is that it will be necessary to construct the powerhouse on
an area where the underlying poor quality rock had suffered damage during the period
when the power station was being commissioned. However, it is considered that is it
unlikely that the foundation will be unviable and the contract will include for all
necessary provisions to address issues that might be found.
Connection of Tunnel 4 to Powerhouse
Tunnel 4 runs from the intake through the right abutment of the dam for approximately
2.7 km. The downstream control structure is connected to the tunnel at the portal in the
rock face. The control structure is located between the foot of a steep slope to the west
and the Tunnel 3 control structure to the east. There is limited space to locate a new
branch near this structure to connect it to the power house. In order to minimize
interference with the control structure the new branch arrangement would need to be
located upstream of the existing bifurcation. However, the available space is limited by
the slopes to the north and west. The tunnel portal could potentially be cut back onto the
slope, but this would need to be limited to avoid significant excavation that may affect
slope stability. Designs have been developed to minimize interference with the existing
control structure and where possible to minimize cutting back the slopes.
Several options were considered in the analysis, including: (i) 90o T-off from the
downstream control structure; (ii) asymmetric Wye branch located downstream of tunnel
portal; (iii) tunneled asymmetric Wye branch into the rock; (iv) S-bend and branch
arrangements; and (v) straight connection to the power house and reconstructing the
outlet and flip bucket on the right side of the power house with capacity to discharge
water at the current capacity of the tunnel. This allows flow to pass from the lower level
outlet without operating the powerhouse for clearing the intake area of the tunnels in case
there is sudden inflow of sediment for any reason. Considering the location, geology and
minimizing excavation of rock outcrop and stabilization measures, head losses for
various arrangements and constructability the straight connection to the powerhouse
(option v above) is selected is the most suitable for the project. This is least cost and
provides about 4 percent more energy than S-bend arrangements and much more than
other options.
Power House Configuration
The proposed type of turbine is the vertical Francis, which is the most commonly used
type of turbine and has high head and flow operational ranges. To determine the optimal
size of the plant, reservoir operation studies have been carried out using flows over the
period of 1962-2009 and considering developments upstream and downstream. In these
studies priority has been given to meet water demand for irrigation according to the
requirement of the country and preferred peaking regime has also been followed. The
selected design exhibits a much lower head loss value than the design proposed in the
1992 Inception Report because the length of the penstock would be significantly shorter
as a result of the powerhouse location and the hydraulic performance of the straight
connection is better than the T-off. It is this improved hydraulic performance that
facilitated the increase of generation capacity from 950 MW to 1,410 MW.
WAPDA
August 2011
4-14
Following optimization of the unit rating by cost analysis, it was decided that three
470 MW turbines will offer the highest rate of return. This rating is also similar to
turbines at the 3rd Extension, with the notable difference being the rotational speed.
Option 1 existing intake (i.e. do nothing to modify the intake in parallel with
building the Project)
Option 2 raised intake on the slope above Tunnel 4 with shaft connection into
upstream part of the tunnel; and
Option 3 raised intake in front of the existing intake, prefabricated and installed at
depth.
Option 1: Do Nothing
Option 1 was do nothing and this is not discussed further as it was considered that the
advancing sediment delta, as presented in the Sedimentation Study performed by HR
Wallingford, had clearly demonstrated the need for the raised intake.
In addition, consideration was given to the raising of the Tunnel 3 intake during
construction of the raised intake for Tunnel 4.
Option 2: Raised Intake on Slope
The raising of the Tunnel 4 intake on the slope above Tunnel 4 is as previously described
in Section 3.4.1.
Option 3: Raised Intake in Front of Existing Intake
Option 3 proposes to construct a raised intake in front of existing intake, which would be
prefabricated and installed at depth. Hydrostatic, earthquake, and sediment flow loadings
were considered to be critical issues for Option 3 as these provide the design
requirements for the foundation conditions and stability analysis. The construction of
this option would require an underwater drill to accurately determine the foundation
conditions around the existing intake and onto which the prefabricated intake structures
WAPDA
August 2011
4-15
would be floated and sunk onto. This added complexity contributed to a high
construction cost estimated at USD 64 million, excluding the drilling platform cost.
Comparison of Options 2 and 3
Calculations indicate that Option 3 will have total head losses that are around three to
five times greater than that of Option 2, depending on whether the plug that forms the
lower bend is installed.
Cost, program and risk were also considered for the two options and the main
conclusions were that Option 3 would require five years construction time compared to
four years for Option 2, and will cost approximately double the expected price for Option
2.
In summary, Option 2 is favored over the other Options 1 and 3.
Tunnel 3 Raised Intake
The excavation area for the Tunnel 4 raised intake is illustrated in Figure 4.6 with the
possible location of Tunnel 3 hatched in red.
Construction of a raised intake at Tunnel 3 after completion of Tunnel 4 raised intake
would be much more difficult because of the steep slope that would be present directly
above Tunnel 3. Secondly, formation of a cofferdam by delayed excavation would not be
possible because the elevation of the desired location would already be at a level that
would be submerged for long periods of time during the year. The combination of these
two factors contributed to the decision to extend the scope of work to include the raising
of Tunnel 3 intake concurrently with the construction of the raised intake for Tunnel 4.
The principles of construction will essentially be the same if Tunnel 3 is included.
However, the excavation area would extend towards the left of the abutment. The
volume of excavation would therefore increase compared to the construction of the
Tunnel 4 raised intake alone but this would present better value than if the raised intakes
for the two tunnels were constructed separately.
Figure 4.6: Plan View of Intake Excavation Area for Tunnel 4 and Possible
Location for Tunnel 3 Intake
Source:
T4CJV
WAPDA
August 2011
4-16
Source:
T4CJV
WAPDA
August 2011
4-17
The GIS option would provide a very compact arrangement and the new switchgear
would have the advantage of being able to use the powerhouse AC and DC auxiliary
power supplies. However, the switchgear would have to be located on a mezzanine floor
above the main transformers.
The GIS bus duct connections between the high voltage side of the transformers to the
switchgear above would need three bays of GIS for the three generator incomers and two
outgoing overhead lines to the existing switchyard. A transmission line gantry would be
mounted on the roof to provide direct connections to the existing switchyard.
WAPDA
August 2011
4-18
5 Stakeholder Consultations
5.1
Introduction
The Government of Pakistan (GoP) as well as international donors (e.g. the World Bank)
place great importance on involving primary and secondary stakeholders for determining
the environmental and social impacts associated with project implementation. In order to
gather local knowledge for baseline, understand project affected persons perceptions
regarding impact significance, and propose meaningful mitigation measures, participation
of stakeholders has been part of the Project ESA process. An attempt has been made to
consult with a full range of stakeholders to obtain their views on project interventions.
The logic behind stakeholder consultation is that a project proponent has shared with all
stakeholders relevant information on the project interventions including potential
environmental and social, (positive and negative) impacts. The consultation process
consists of initiating dialogues among all the stakeholders. The process, starting from
awareness campaign to the identification, inclusion and participation of project affected
persons (PAPs) has been able to build on the existence of the Tarbela Dam which is now
a normal part of local communities lives. PAPs and stakeholders are generally able to
understand the implications of the Project activities.
The present ESA has been prepared after consulting with local communities, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and concerned government departments/
organizations dealing particularly with related fields and to ensure that their views and
concerns have been taken into account in the study.
5.2
Objectives
The following consultative objectives have served as the moving force for the design,
implementation and fact findings for participation process:
To have interaction for primary and secondary data collection with project affectees
and other stakeholders;
5.3
Identification of Stakeholders
Stakeholders include all those who affect and are being affected by policies, decisions or
actions within a particular system. Stakeholders can be groups of people, organizations,
institutions and sometimes even individuals. Stakeholders can be divided into primary
and secondary stakeholder categories.
WAPDA
August 2011
5-1
5.4
Consultation Process
A series of comprehensive consultations were carried out with the project stakeholders at
various locations during the preparation of the scoping document and ESA. The
consultation and scoping sessions were designed specifically to provide project
information to the public. These sessions were informal to encourage a friendly social
environment in which participants were comfortable in raising questions, expressing their
opinions and concerns about the project besides seeking clarification regarding their
concerns. The participatory consultative approach was employed for data collection.
The focus group discussions were instrumental in the process, whereas one-to-one
meetings were held with the institutional stakeholders. These discussions were held with
project beneficiaries and other local communities at Tarbela, Ghazi, Topi, Hattian and
Haripur. The consultation process provided a meaningful understanding of local social
issues for the social impact analyses and preparation of a SIMF for the Project area. The
main activities are summarized in Table 5.1 below (details of the participants are
provided in Annex A).
Table 5.1:
Activity
Initial awareness
campaign (Scoping
Date
Accomplishment
10 August 2010
stage)
WAPDA
August 2011
5-2
Date
Accomplishment
10 August 2010
campaign (Scoping
stage)
Consultation
Meetings with
Institutions
Scoping sessions
during preparation of
ESA
2011
February 17 to 27,
2011
Consultation
workshops
and Peshawar.
March17, 2011
Gender consultation
February 18 to 22,
2011
WAPDA
August 2011
5-3
Possible damage to flora and fauna particularly at proposed site for power house
should be addressed.
Construction related issues like excavated material, soil erosion and hazards for local
communities and labor force should be appropriately addressed during the
construction activities.
WAPDA will ensure free mobility of women and children, especially students of
girls and boys schools at WAPDA Right Bank Colony
Khabbal;
Pehur Hamlet;
Pontian;
Darra Mohat;
Kukar Chawa;
Ghari Mera;
Ghazi Hamlet;
WAPDA
August 2011
5-4
Lack of health and educational facilities in the area, especially in the villages where
old affectees of Tarbela and Ghazi Barotha are residing;
Recruitment in Tarbela and GBHPP projects from other parts of the country;
WAPDA
August 2011
5-5
Shortage of water and low water table in the areas downstream Ghazi barrage;
WAPDA should fix a quota in employment for local peoples in TDP and GBHPP;
WAPDA should help in the up gradation of educational and health facilities in the
Ghazi and Topi area;
WAPDA may rehabilitate the old road near Ghazi and use during construction phase
to avoid traffic hazards to local community;
WAPDA may establish recreational parks at Ghazi and Topi for local peoples; and
WAPDA may engage a NGO like GBTI to work with local communities for the
implementation of the project in environmentally and socially safe way.
5.5
Gender Consultations
Besides the public consultation, gender consultation was also carried out at ten different
locations in study area. During consultation sessions with women, they were briefed
about the project and its main features. Womens main concerns were:
Drinking water is contaminated with other particles and people have to use this
contaminated water;
Problems of proper disposal of solid waste and sewage issues at Right Bank Colony;
Inadequate building structure, lack of furniture, lack of teaching staff in the Girls
Middle School at Pehur Hamlet; and
WAPDA
August 2011
5-6
WAPDA
August 2011
5-7
37. WAPDA may engage a NGO like GBTI to work with local communities for the
implementation of the project in environmentally and socially safe way.
Consultation with Women
38. Drinking water is contaminated with other particles and people have to use this
contaminated water;
39. Problems of proper disposal of solid waste and sewage issues at Right Bank Colony;
40. Needs to introduce computer as a subject in the schools;
41. Lack of cold drinking water in summer in the school;
42. Lack of health facilities, especially for women in Civil Hospital Topi;
43. Seepage problems in Topi area due to Ghazi Barrage pond;
44. Inadequate building structure, lack of furniture, lack of teaching staff in the Girls Middle
School at Pehur Hamlet;
45. Needs of a vocational training centre for women in the area.
5.6
5.7
Information Disclosure
A Public Hearing was held for the ESA in Tarbela on 23 June 2011, in accordance with
the ESA review and approval process in the Country defined by the IEE/EIA Regulations
(see Figure 2.1). Organized by the KP-EPA, the Hearing was attended by the WAPDA
officials, media, local representatives, and most importantly, local community members,
some of which were Tarbela and GBHPP affectees. During the Hearing, the WAPDA
officials presented the salient features of the project, while the ESA consultants presented
the key aspects and findings of the ESA. This was followed by a well-participated
question-answer session, during which the participants raised queries and provided
recommendations about the project. The participants highly appreciated the project,
however the community members expected WAPDA to allocate some of the project
funds for infrastructure development within their settlements. Their expectations
included construction/establishment of schools, vocational and technical training centers,
water supply schemes, and sewage disposal and treatment systems. In response,
WAPDA informed the participants that most of these development works were already
included in the Social Assistance Activities detailed in the SIMF.
Once finalized, the ESA report will be made available to the stakeholders at sites
designated by KP-EPA in accordance with PEPA-1997. In addition, a Non-Technical
Summary of the ESA will be translated into the Urdu language and made available to the
local communities in the Project area. This will ensure that local communities are aware
of projects key impacts, mitigation measures and implementation mechanism. This
summary will also be disclosed through the official websites of WAPDA and the World
Bank.
WAPDA
August 2011
5-8
Overview
The T4HP project activities cover a limited area located at the right bank of the Indus on
both sides of the Tarbela dam (see Figures 1.2 and 6.1). Direct and indirect impacts are
expected not to extend more than 5 km upstream and 10 km downstream of the dam and
2 km inland on both sides of the river. Some indirect impacts might be expected at larger
distance in quarries and borrow areas situated at some 20 40 km from Tarbela. Since no
cumulative and induced impacts of the project are expected both upstream and
downstream of the dam, the study area of the ESA has been restricted to the above
defined project sites and their surrounding areas.
6.2
Physical Environment
6.2.1 Physiography
Tarbela Dam and storage reservoir are located near to the end of a relatively narrow
valley of the Indus cutting through the Hazara hills. These hills form a part of the foot
slopes of the Western Himalayan Mountains. The river valley near the dam is up to 1.8
km wide and filled with alluvial deposits, which are submerged by the reservoir. The
northern part of the reservoir stretches about 100 km upstream and is situated between
much higher mountains with elevations over 2400 m. The hill sides near the dam are
generally steep and are rising to an altitude around 600 m asl.
The Ghazi- Barotha headpond is a small regulating reservoir immediately downstream of
the dam and belonging to the Ghazi-Barotha barrage. This barrage is situated at a
distance of ten kilometers from Tarbela nearby the cities of Topi (right bank) and Ghazi
(left bank). From here the topography slopes more gently via a transitional zone and
further down towards the agricultural plains of Punjab and those along the Kabul river.
Although the project is entirely located in Swabi district, the project area stretches over
two different administrative districts: The right bank is Swabi district, whereas the left
bank belongs to Haripur district. Swabi district lies between the Indus and Kabul Rivers.
The total area of Swabi district is 1,543 km2 with mostly hilly terrain (78%) and the
remaining part is flat. The northern part is predominantly hilly and is sloping towards the
agricultural plain in the south. The majority of the hills are found in the Gadoon area in
the north-east. They are a continuation of the Mahaban Hills. Other important hills, the
Naranji Hills are situated in the north-western corner of the district.
The heights of the Naranji Hills in the north vary between 750 to 1,400 m asl. In the
south, along the border of the Nowshera district there are hills forming part of the
Khattak Hills, north of the Kabul River. From the foot of these hills the southern plain
runs down, at first rather steep sloped and then gently down towards the Kabul River.
The lower southern half of the district slopes towards the Indus River.
The intake of the Tunnel 4 is located at the right abutment of the Dam, which consists of
rocks, that belong to the Salkhala formation. The rock formations are characterized by
intensive folding and faulting. The area between the intake and the outlet of the tunnel
has a steep gradient. Near the outlet the topography changes into a rugged plain situated
at the foot of the slopes towards the former riverbed of the Indus.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-1
Figure 6.1:
Source:
T4CJV
WAPDA
August 2011
6-2
The area where the powerhouse and the tail race channel will be constructed is a flat part
of the old riverbed, partly submerged by the Ghazi Barotha lake. On the embankment
runs the existing road between the dam and the Right Bank Colony. The potential
borrow areas identified are mostly found near to the project site: sand is found in the
riverbed near Sobra City and at a commercial site in Qibla Band while clay is available
at borrow sites in the Gandaf area. Sobra City is on hilly terrain with thick vegetation
and the Quibla Bandi site is on bare, flat land located in an old bed of the Indus River,
with very limited vegetation. The Gandaf area has large volumes of exposed clay which
is already exploited by the local people.
Khanpur Punjkhata - a well watered plain lying in the south eastern corner of the
district; and
Chhachh - west of Haripur city, this entire tract is sub-merged under the Tarbela
Reservoir.
The notable minerals in the Haripur district are sandstone, limestone and dolomite, these
mines were explored in Ghazi tehsil.
The major land use of the Haripur and Swabi districts includes cultivated and
uncultivated land. The total land use area for Swabi is 148,689 ha and for Haripur is
75,345 ha of which respectively 59% and 42% are cultivated. The remainder consists of
wasteland, rangeland and forest
6.2.3 Climate
Two seasons prevail in the area: winter (October to March); and summer (April to
September). In general, the climate of the area is mildly hot in summer and cold in
winter.
6.2.4 Temperature
December to February are the coldest months and the minimum temperatures vary
between 2 and 11C in these months, whereas the maximum temperature during March to
July vary between 31 and 48C. Swabi district has more extremes in climates, with its
summer season being very hot. A steep rise of temperature is observed from May to June
and even July, August and September record quite high temperatures. There is a rapid
fall of temperature recorded from October onwards to the coldest month of January. The
maximum, minimum and mean temperature of the Project area for the last five years is
presented in Figure 6.2.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-3
Figure 6.2:
(2006-10)
Maximum Temperature
Minimum Temperature
Mean Temperature
50
46.4
44.4
42.8
45
39.2
38.4
40
33
35
33.1
31.3
37.2
36.4
31.5
30.2
29.6
30
27.2
26.4
25.5
22.8
25
25.1
21.7
18.2
20
19.8
20.2
20.8
19.4
17.2
16.5
15.5
13.8
13.1
15
25
10.4
11.8
8.6
10
6.6
3.4
5
0
Jan
Source:
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
6.2.5 Rainfall
The average monthly rainfall in the Project area is 78.86 cm with most of the rainfall
occurring in the months of July and August. Towards the end of the cold weather in
January and February there are occasional thunder storms and hail storms. The mean
monthly rainfall for the Project area is provided graphically in Figure 6.3.
Figure 6.3:
20
14.97
15
10
6.54
7.00
6.20
6.32
4.73
5
2.49
2.45
2.30
3.06
0.91
0
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
6.2.6 Humidity
Humidity is the amount of water vapor in the air and indicates the likelihood of
precipitation, dew or fog. The relative humidity in the Project area is quite high
throughout the year due to evaporation from the Tarbela Reservoir with maximum
WAPDA
August 2011
6-4
humidity recorded in the month of August. This increase in humidity is attributed to the
monsoon rains and consequent high evaporation rate. Average monthly humidity of the
Project area is provided in Table 6.1.
Table 6.1:
Y/M
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
81
79
72
65
57
66
81
86
78
72
80
84
monthly
mean
20062010
Source: Hydrology Directorate Tarbela, WAPDA
6.2.7 Evaporation
The evaporation data (2006-2010) in the Project area are presented in Figure 6.4. Total
annual evaporation over the last five years has ranged between 84.9 to 96.6 cm with an
overall average of 86.1 cm. Monthly data show that the maximum evaporation is
recorded during summer (April to September), with the highest evaporation in June.
Comparison of the yearly evaporation and rainfall data show that total evaporation
exceeds rainfall by about 9%.
Figure 6.4:
16
14.91
14
12
10.97
10.52
10
9.23
8.08
7.84
7.71
5.69
3.93
4
2.95
2.13
2.12
2
0
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
6.2.8 Geology
The Tarbela Dam and Reservoir is located in the Hazara Hills, part of the mountain group
known as the Lesser Himalayas. The Hazara Hills are composed of crystalline and
metamorphic rocks with non-fossiliferous sedimentary deposits and gabbroic intrusions,
ranging in age from Precambrian to Permian. The present geologic structure is the result
of extensive folding, shearing and faulting associated with regional crustal deformation
WAPDA
August 2011
6-5
arising from the northward subduction (under thrusting) of the Indian Sub Continental
Plate below the Eurasian Plate.
There are three distinct geological formations at the Tarbela site:
the Hazara Formation - forming the bedrock base of the Indus River; and
The general orientation of bedding indicates that the banks of the river are the limbs of an
anticline, the axis of which has been eroded by the Indus River. The geological
mismatch between the right and Left Banks is considered to be the result of displacement
along a near vertical fault that runs along the right side of the valley.
The right and Left Banks are separated by the 1.8 km wide flood plain of the Indus River.
In the past the river flowed in a braided stream pattern on alluvial deposits at an elevation
above sea level of approximately 338 m (El. 338 m). Above the flood plain the hillsides
are generally steep with slopes often controlled by the dip of bedding or joint systems.
T4CJV carried out a Geological and Geotechnical Assessment following a review of the
available literature on the existing scheme, the investigations undertaken by T4CJV and
an assessment of the geotechnical parameters used in the design.
6.2.9 Seismology
The Tarbela Dam Project is located in a seismically active region associated with the
convergence of the Indian and Eurasian crustal plates along the Himalayan mountain
ranges. The basement rocks of the northern margin of the Indian plate are moving
relatively northward and pushed below the Tethyan slab of the Eurasian plate. Plate
convergence is accommodated by two major thrust faults which align with two
approximately parallel belts of seismicity along the Himalayan Arc.
The two seismogenic fault zones are the shallow and steep portions of the northward
dipping Himalayan thrust. The shallow portion referred to as the Detachment dips very
gently and separates the early Precambrian basement of the Indian Shield from an
overlying wedge-shaped mass of sediments and metasediments. The steep portion,
designated the Basement Thrust, offsets basement rocks within the northern margin of the
shield. The Main Central Thrust (MCT) and the Main Boundary Fault (MBF) are
branches of the detachment and the basement thrust respectively. They are probably
active fault zones, but of secondary importance in the general tectonic regime of the
Himalayan front.
Some of the strongest earthquakes that have occurred in historic times have been
associated with movements along the Himalayan Thrust.
Seismic Risk at the Project Site
Based on the Seismic Hazard Assessment conducted by T4CJV where a review of the
structural geology and the seismicity of the Project area was carried out, the three faults
posing the greatest earthquake hazard to the dam site are the Darband (Indus), Panjal
(Tarnawai) and Regional Faults. The Darband Fault is one of the steeply dipping faults
in the Indus Valley System. It passes below the Tarbela Dam on the right side of the
valley and is believed to have caused 213 m near vertical buried rock escarpment in the
dam foundation. The Panjal Fault is at its closest point approximately 12 km from the
Tarbela Reservoir. It extends for at least 980 km southwest from the Western Himalayan
WAPDA
August 2011
6-6
Syntaxis, and may continue for another 50 km in the same general direction to the Attock
area. The Regional Fault is a name that refers to the parts of the detachment, Hazara
Lower Seismic Zone (HLSZ) and other possible basement thrusts passing below the dam
site. Any one of these faults has the potential to generate a major earthquake which could
cause severe shaking of the Project structures.
In October 2005 a large earthquake (7.6 on the Richter scale) occurred in Pakistan and
caused widespread damage. The epicentre was approximately 100 km north east of
Tarbela. Whilst the earthquake and aftershocks were felt at Tarbela there was no damage
to the dam, powerhouse, engineered slopes or any of the associated structures. The
ground acceleration experienced was in the range predicted by previous seismic analysis.
Micro-seismic Network
A micro-seismic network surrounding the Tarbela Reservoir site was put into operation
in August, 1973, one year before the first filling of the Reservoir. The system was
designed and installed by the Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory of Columbia
University, New York, USA. In general the network was established to improve the
assessment of the seismic risk at the Project site; specific purposes for the monitoring
array were to investigate the activity of the Darband Fault and whether earthquakes
would be induced by the initial filling and subsequent annual fillings and drawdown of
the Reservoir.
6.2.10 Soil
Soils in the Project area are shallow and rocky on the hillsides, brown colored, calcareous
and low in organic matter with predominantly loamy textures. They are in use as grazing
land and covered with low scrubs. Near the river some alluvial soils can be found. Most
of these soils are uncultivated with scattered bushes or trees. Loamy or clay loam soils
have been developed in wind-blown deposits (loess and cover sand) found further down
in the plains situated South and West of the city of Topi. They are mostly in use for
agriculture and partly irrigated, a broad range of crops are grown on these lands. East of
Ghazi predominantly brown residual clay loam soils can be found developed on the hilly
slopes of the hinterland and footslopes of the Hazara hills. There is no irrigation but
partly cropped (barani) and partly in use as grazing area.
The arable soil of the Swabi district has developed either from river alluvium or loess
sediments. Texture of the river alluvium terraces ranges from sandy loam to loamy sand,
and loam approaching clay loam.
There are three main types of alluvial deposits on the valley bottom of the Indus River
(the lower terrace and riverbed):
Dense rounded to sub-rounded boulder gravel, which predominates at the site. The
coarse components of the boulder gravel are in grain to grain contact while the voids
are completely or almost completely filled with medium to fine sand. Coarse sand
and fine gravel sizes are almost entirely missing from this gap-graded material.
Open voided, highly pervious rounded boulder gravel, termed openwork, having
the same coarse component as the material described above. However, voids
between boulders are not filled or only partially filled with sand.
Sand, gravelly sand, silty sand and silt layers, found throughout the foundation. The
largest sand layers were located in the central portion of the main embankment
foundation where their thickness is as much as 1.32 m to 2.64 m. Sampling and
WAPDA
August 2011
6-7
testing proved that the sand is quite dense, with relative densities approaching 100%.
Consolidation testing established that alluvial silts are also very dense and relatively
incompressible, indicating that they were subjected to a considerable preconsolidation load.
Soils of the Sobra and Qibla Bandi areas are sandy in nature and the soil of the Gandaf
area is typically clay dominant. It is for these reasons that the areas have been selected
for borrow materials in the project construction. In the area of the proposed powerhouse
there is no soil present as the area is generally existing concrete structures or a steep rock
slope.
Results of the soil analysis are provided in Table 6.2. As previously mentioned there is
virtually no soil present in the area where the project structures are proposed.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-8
Table 6.2:
Project
Area
Saturation
pH
EC(a) x
10 at
o
Location
SAR(a)
25 C
Ca+Mg
Na
CO3
HCO3
Cl
SO4
Organic
Matter
1.
30
7.9
0.65
5.0
1.25
0.27
4.0
1.2
1.32
0.79
0.4
2.
30
7.9
0.80
6.0
1.50
0.36
5.0
0.8
2.06
0.86
0.5
3.
28
8.0
1.10
9.5
1.50
0.30
5.5
4.8
1.00
0.68
0.5
4.
36
8.0
1.10
6.5
3.45
0.19
5.5
1.6
3.04
1.90
0.4
(a)
Soil Standard Limits: Electrical conductivity (EC) Less than 4 deci Siemens per meter ds/m, Sodium Adsorption Ratio (SAR) Less than 18;
WAPDA
August 2011
(b)
6-9
6.2.13 Sedimentation
The Indus River is one of the largest sediment producing rivers in the world. The main
source of sediment is from the glacial landscape and erosion from steep sided barren
slopes. The predicted rate of sediment inflow was 0.294 billion cubic meters (bcm) per
year meaning that the dam would silt up to 90% capacity in 50 years and thereafter
continue to provide only about 1.2 bcm of live storage (World Commission on Dams,
2000 Chapter on Tarbela). A number of sediment management measures were examined
at the time but considered not to be feasible.
In practice, the actual sediment inflow rate has been significantly lower than predicted,
with an average rate of 0.106 bcm, i.e. 36% of the predicted rate. However the
proportion of sediment inflow trapped in the reservoir (the trap efficiency) was slightly
higher than predicted. The useful life of the dam is now considered to be 85 years
although, as with the prediction, the usable storage will gradually decline over this
period. An unexpected aspect of the sediment deposition however, is the advancement of
the sediment delta, which is now located 14 km from the dam. There are concerns that
under earthquake loading, the sediment may liquefy and block all low-level outlets,
including power intakes.
Measures are being investigated to reduce the risk of liquefaction damage and also to
prolong the life of the reservoir. These include physical measures such as provision of an
underwater protection to the low level outlets, including power intakes and sluicing
tunnels to remove sediment, and management measures to reduce the proportion of
sediment deposited and its location. Reduction in sediment load entering the reservoir is
not possible due to the altitude and nature of the catchment. In terms of management
measures, the operating rule of the reservoir has been changed to raise the minimum
drawdown level from 396 m to 417 m and thereafter raise it gradually every year. This
would have the effect of depositing sediment in the upper reaches and would reduce the
advance of the sediment delta, but at the cost of reducing live storage with the trade off of
reducing water availability in the dry season.
6.2.14 Hydrology
Tarbela Reservoir was designed to store water from Indus River for irrigation purposes
and releases from the reservoir entirely depend upon irrigation indents from the
Provinces. The mean monthly water releases from the dam for the last five years (20062010) are provided in Table 6.3 and also depicted in Figure 6.5 and Figure 6.6. It is
WAPDA
August 2011
6-10
evident that monthly releases vary from 1,194 million cubic meters (Mm3) to
16,881 Mm3.
Presently the irrigation water demand downstream of Tarbela is met predominantly by
releases from Tunnels 1, 2 and 3. Additional demand is met by Tunnel 5 in the first
instance and Tunnel 4 is then used to make up any difference.
Historically Tunnel 4 mainly releases water during the months of May, June and July, as
demonstrated by the data in Table 6.4. Table 6.5 provides the irrigation releases of
Tunnel 5. It is evident from the discharge data for Tunnels 4 and 5 that there has
consistently been a significantly higher discharge from Tunnel 5. This results from
Tunnel 5 being given priority for water releases to meet the additional water requirement.
Mean Monthly Flow Releases from Tarbela Reservoir (Mm3)
Table 6.3:
Y/M
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Total
2006
1,543
2,246
2,251
1,959
7,643
11,022
12,631
18,811
8,314
4,909
5,008
2,097
78,433
2007
1,501
2,495
2,171
3,084
7,221
10,362
11,570
13,507
9,621
4,897
4,724
2,270
73,423
2008
963
2,241
1,930
2,045
5,668
10,910
13,568
11,965
9,263
3,577
4,330
1,776
68,237
2009
933
2,197
2,619
2,092
6,053
9,971
10,386
14,802
9,054
4,737
4,009
2,257
69,108
2010
1,032
2,222
2,398
2,487
5,339
9,098
16,492
25,323
9,535
4,441
4,737
3,281
86,383
Mean
1,194
2,280
2,274
2,333
6,384
10,273
12,929
16,881
9,157
4,512
4,561
2,336
75,116
Figure 6.5:
4561
4512
Sep
9157
16881
Jul
12929
10273
May
6384
2333
Mar
2274
2280
Jan
1194
0
WAPDA
August 2011
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
6-11
18000
Figure 6.6:
90000
85000
78433
80000
73423
75000
68237
69108
2008
2009
70000
65000
60000
55000
50000
2006
2007
Table 6.4:
Year
Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
1974
1975
2010
342
687
Jun
Jul
Aug
1,206
1,740
699
4,954
3,173
Sep
Oct
919
1,533
4,118
173
102
639
93
124
945
1,125
1979
68
2,427
1980
502
4,053
3,477
4,052
666
1,674
863
1,726
752
1,940
1,776
64
1,498
1,011
247
49
284
1,660
1,134
37
469
919
1,977
555
107
232
493
492
2,473
1,208
1976
1977
1978
12
1981
173
25
12
Nov
Dec
342
222
74
382
1982
1983
1984
123
185
159
1985
1986
1987
542
1988
617
1989
999
7
123
542
617
1990
1991
1992
1993
WAPDA
August 2011
6-12
Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
1994
Apr
May
Jun
23
1,819
247
1,962
394
1995
1996
218
1,829
31
1,946
3,358
1998
1,079
2,800
1,106
1999
530
3,603
2,327
2000
10
90
242
1997
14
2001
2002
37
2003
257
2004
524
2008
1,934
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
903
2,348
640
16
2010
422
Source: WAPDA.
Table 6.5:
Year
Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
1974
1975
1,155
3,341
4,463
Apr
May
Jun
703
5,828
1,126
2,898
895
3,452
2,472
86
4,062
1,378
1976
Jul
Aug
1977
2,561
1978
3,043
993
678
3,736
3,190
1,233
790
2,893
543
189
1979
1980
1,443
698
875
1,883
3,348
3,119
1981
248
85
1,514
2,177
3,692
1982
419
994
660
2,263
4,206
1,545
1983
560
263
942
3,578
2,314
1984
2,434
2,602
1985
745
1986
109
490
1,042
750
422
977
531
92
1,136
533
60
1,554
4,429
984
363
208
2,505
4,775
933
1,880
2,792
2,967
218
184
81
1988
134
1989
1,504
475
1990
1,504
1,327
4,213
1991
101
2,200
1,413
1987
WAPDA
August 2011
97
129
205
312
6-13
Month
Jan
Feb
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
1992
20
3,482
3,690
303
1993
418
3,441
386
1994
835
4,087
1995
228
2,510
932
3,154
3,053
1997
158
2,274
1998
134
2,868
2,565
1999
208
2,484
1,256
1,743
4,276
1996
Mar
Apr
2000
2001
2002
1,155
3,341
4,463
703
5,828
1,126
2,898
895
3,452
2,472
86
4,062
1,378
2003
Sep
Oct
882
903
2,348
1,233
790
552
2,561
2008
3,043
993
3,736
3,190
678
Dec
182
2004
2010
Nov
Source: WAPDA.
6.2.15 Flooding
Flood management was not considered at the design stage of the dam and therefore no
predictions were made with regard to flood potential at that stage. It subsequently
became apparent that the impact of the Tarbela Dam Project on attenuation of actual high
flood peaks was significant during the filling period of June through to August, for
impounding approximately 12 bcm, or 19% out of the kharif inflow of 64 bcm.
Attenuation of peak Indus River flows is variable depending on the timing of the flood in
relation to the reservoir level that is drawn down prior to the wet season. The peak flows
in July 1988, July 1989 and August 1997 were reduced by 21%, 26% and 43%
respectively, whereas a peak flow of similar magnitude in September 1992 was
attenuated by only 2% as the reservoir levels were already considerably higher in
readiness for the forthcoming irrigation season3.
During the flooding in Pakistan of August 2010 there was a 28% reduction of the peak
flood (inflow reservoir 29,500 m3/sec and outflow 21,300 m3/sec) with a record discharge
of the spillway of Tarbela. However, this did not result in any damage.
World Commission on Large Dams case study report Tarbela Dam and related aspects of the Indus
River basin Pakistan November, 2000
WAPDA
August 2011
6-14
standards adopted by WAPDA shown in Table 6.7. These surface water samples were
collected from the following locations:
Tarbela Reservoir;
WAPDA has developed standards following detailed field investigation for surface and
ground water to be used for irrigation of crops, vegetables and orchards. As surface
water is not used for drinking in the project, the water samples were not tested for
drinking purposes and the results are not comparable to the World Health Organisation
(WHO) Guidelines.
Table 6.6:
Sample
Total
Point
Res
EC x
Na2CO3
106 at
Ca++
Mg++
Na+
K+
CO3--
HCO3-
Cl-
SO4--
Cations
Anions
SAR
Meq/L
25oC
1.
1.2
0.6
0.23
0.16
1.5
0.2
0.4
2.19
2.10
0.2
200
2.
1.4
0.5
0.26
0.17
1.6
0.3
0.4
2.33
2.30
0.3
220
3.
1.1
0.8
0.26
0.16
1.5
0.3
0.5
2.32
2.30
0.3
220
Table 6.7:
Parameter
Good
Marginal
Hazardous
RSC Meq/L
<2.5
2.5-5.0
>5.0
SAR
10
10-18
>18
Chloride Meq/L
<4
4-10
>10
< 1,500
1,500-3,000
>3,000
EC MicroSiemens/cm*
By comparing surface water quality results with the standards set by WAPDA it is
concluded that all parameters measured in these water samples fall within the required
water quality standards defined for the Project.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-15
The water samples collected were analyzed for their suitability for drinking purpose and
all necessary physical, chemical and biological parameters. The test results show that all
samples are generally fit for drinking with two exceptions;
The sample from Ghazi city TMA office shows a slightly raised Arsenic value
(0.015 mg/L) against WHO standards of 0.01 mg/L. This is however within the
Pakistan NEQS of 0.05.
Total Bacterial Colony Count were exceeding permissible limit in all samples. (Total
Colony Count was too numerous to count).
Ghazi Market;
The ambient air quality was monitored at each of these locations continuously for 24
hours. During the monitoring priority pollutants i.e. carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen
dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2) and particulate matter (PM10) were monitored and
the results are provided in Table 6.8. It is evident that concentrations of all ambient air
quality parameters are within the limit of NEQS and within the World Bank and World
Health Organization (WHO) standards.
Table 6.8:
Sample
Point
24 hr
Avg.
SO2 ug/m3
NEQS
WHO(a)
24 hr
Avg.
NEQS
CO mg/m3
World
24 hr
Bank
Avg.
NEQS
PM10 ug/m3
World
24 hr
Bank
Avg.
NEQS
World
Bank
1.
8.42
80
150
0.67
120
20
4.00
47.89
250
50
2.
4.57
80
150
0.43
120
20
3.57
100.35
250
50
3.
5.15
80
150
0.44
120
20
3.46
85.78
250
50
(a)
6.2.19 Noise
Noise levels exceeding 85 dB are harmful to human health. Excessive noise level
damages the eardrum and very high noise levels damage human lungs. Continuous
exposure to excessive noise causes depression and can damage the nervous system.
Noise pollution in the project area is mainly attributable to traffic as there are no
industries or other noise sources present in the area. Traffic from vehicles plying in the
area is also very low. The sound levels were monitored at the same locations as the
WAPDA
August 2011
6-16
ambient air quality was monitored using a portable, digital sound meter. The daily
average monitoring results are provided Table 6.9 below.
The noise levels measured at different locations ranged from 45.2- 66.5 dB, the upper
reading being above the NEQS limits. The readings measured at relatively busy
locations are exceeding World Bank Standards. The maximum noise level monitored
was generated by vehicular traffic at the Ghazi market.
Table 6.9:
Sample
Residential(a)
Residential
Point
Day
Day
Day
Night
Day (Avg)
Night (Avg)
65
55
55
45
61
51
65
55
55
45
57
51
65
55
55
45
62
52
Effective from 1 July 2010 up to 30 June 2012, thereafter the NEQS will align with the World Bank Standards
Roads leading to Swabi, Topi, and the WAPDA Right Bank Colony are the busiest;
The Peak hours of traffic are between 08.00 and 10.00 hrs and 13.00 to 16.00 hrs;
and
Traffic on the roads between 22.00 and 08.00 hrs is extremely low.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-17
Figure 6.7:
WAPDA
August 2011
6-18
Table 6.10:
Mode of Transport
A
B(b)
G(a)
119
19
204
589
722
20
395
330
283
383
Motorcycle / Rickshaw
1,429
1,017
739
482
962
879
117
2,110
1,167
1,766
1,577
3,535
2,054
1,387
932
1,031
812
252
4,372
1,813
3,077
3,064
745
226
530
151
155
146
194
1,967
631
1,492
982
38
67
33
33
39
61
198
80
191
95
2 Axel
69
16
17
14
14
105
86
287
268
3 Axel
16
33
22
28
32
64
64
99
4 Axel
18
11
25
5 Axel
Tractor
60
11
16
96
127
81
123
122
11
14
15
116
147
168
195
28
25
40
48
6,134
3,389
2,739
1,872
2,832
2,627
649
9,431
4,492
7,464
6,861
Total PCUs(c)
7,322
3,201
2,879
3,004
5,625
6,085
922
12,943
7,553
11,023
10,947
Animal Drawn
Minibuses / wagons
Buses
Trucks
Trailers
Tractors
Tractor Trolley
Others
(b)
Traffic on roads B and G are counted on Tuesday and Thursday respectively as this traffic is assumed to be almost constant
(c)
WAPDA
August 2011
6-19
6.3
Biological Environment
WAPDA
August 2011
6-20
Name
Declared by
Raqs-e-Sardaran
Chief Minister
Mang
Chief Minister
Bagra
Kalinjer
Nara;
Khalabat;
Kag;
Dhenda; and
Beer.
Annual Herbs;
Perennial Grasses;
Perennial Trees.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-21
Annual Herbs
Herbs including short grasses and short leaved forbs appear in the spring after the rains.
Their growth activity is restricted to the brief moist period which lasts for about 48 weeks during which they complete their life cycle and set seeds before the dry period
starts. These have high ecological amplitude and grow on a variety of ecologically
different sites. Both the grasses and herbs grow in abundance in the spring season.
Perennial Grasses
Perennial grasses grow in monsoon season. Most of them are non-palatable to livestock,
only few including Cynodon dactylon, and Cenchrus ciliaris are palatable.
Perennial Shrubs
Perennial shrubs generally form the cover of hill slopes. They include Zizyphus
nummularia, Lantana camara, Justicia adhatoda, and Cannabis sativa. The shrubs of
Zizyphus nummularia provide browse for the goats in all seasons, while others are nonpalatable.
Perennial Trees
The important perennial trees are Acacia nilotica, Acacia modesta, and Zizyphus
mauritiana. The former is used for timber whereas the latter two species provide browse
and fuel wood.
The vegetation pattern of the Project area is closely related to the topographic features of
the area. This is derived from the fact that both vegetation and soil overtime have largely
been influenced by the nature of the sediments, drainage characteristics as well as the
prevailing climatic conditions of the region. Due to varied geographical features, the
Project area is rich in variety of flora but has no orchard, game reserves and other
environmentally sensitive places. The land use pattern of the Ghazi Forest Sub-division
is provided in Table 6.12 which reveals that terrestrial flora is mainly composed of
grasses (range land) and scrub (shrubs and scattered tress). This land use pattern is
representative of areas surrounding the project.
Table 6.12:
Description
Forest
Area (acres)
3,163.15
18,938.45
Range Land
42,991.25
River beds
Water bodies
Total
3.37
16,591.11
114,405.05
Vegetation Sampling
6-22
Powerhouse (slopes);
Vegetation Analysis
The survey recorded 133 plant species among which 31 are trees, 6 climbers, 25 shrubs,
63 herbs and 8 grasses. An overall species list is provided in Annex B. The most
dominant plants growing in the study area are: Dalbergia sissoo (Shesham), Acacia
modesta (Phulai), Leucaena leucocephala (Velati Kikar), Grewia villosa (Dhaman),
Dodonaea viscose(Sanatha) , Justicia adhatoda (Bakar), Lantana camara (Punchphulai),
Buddleja asiatica (Banna), Themeda anathera(Bahari ghass), Erioscirpus comosus
(babya).
The Project area is well known for production of natural medicinal plants. The plants
and their medicinal uses are presented in Annex B. There were no endangered, rare or
vulnerable plant species, as per IUCN Red-List, found in the Project area. The vegetation
patterns observed at different localities is outlined in Annex B, in addition to the planted
species found in the Project area.
The aesthetic value of the Project area can be further enhanced by cultivation of a variety
of shade, ornamental and fragrant plant species. In Annex B lists some of the plant
species recommended for planting in the Project area locations.
The wildlife areas in the Project comprise of the riverine and dry sub-tropical, semievergreen scrub forests. Terrestrial fauna of the area have also been studied previously
during execution of the GBHPP. The study areas for the Project and the GBHPP are
quite different. The area of influence for the Project is much smaller in extent than the
study areas for the GBHPP.
During the two field surveys conducted for GBHPP during 1990 and 1991, 63 species of
birds and three species of mammals were recorded inhabiting the Project area from Ghazi
downstream up to the Haro River, the site of the power station close to the Barotha
village. The third study (November 2002 to May 2003) was confined to the floodplains
only, including the islands and open river water starting from Ghazi and downstream up
to the confluence of Indus with River Kabul near the Attock Bridge, excluding the Attock
Gorge. During the monthly surveys of the riverine forests (belas) on the islands and
along the river banks 63 birds (including resident and migratory) were recorded while the
presence of 12 mammals and a few reptiles were confirmed by analysis of their different
WAPDA
August 2011
6-23
signs including footprints, faecal material, burrows/dens and also by interviewing the
locals.
Only three mammals were recorded during 1990 and 1991 whilst 12 species were
identified during 2002-2003. Neither the smooth-coated Otter (Lutrogaleperspicillata) or
Common Otter (Lutralutra ) were reported for the area. The Wild Boar and Asiatic Jackal
were the most common among the mammals, being widely distributed in the belas where
enough cover was available to provide shelter. Among the reptiles, at a few places the
presence of freshwater turtles was evident although they were only observed once.
Similarly, the presence of snakes was also reported but none was observed or recorded.
Indian Monitor Lizards were recorded twice although these would usually be more
prevalent.
Study from Literature
In addition to the birds recorded from the Project area (floodplains only), a number of
species are reported from the literature (TJ Roberts, Birds of Pakistan, Vol.1 & 2.1991,
1992) which can be expected in this area or they use the Indus River for passage
migration. A complete listing of the species recorded during these previous studies and
other expected species is contained in Annex B. From all the birds on this list, only one
species i.e. White-eyed Pochard (Aythyanyroca) is listed on the IUCN Red List in the
Lower Risk category, near threatened (LR/nt). This species was not however reported in
any of the surveys conducted for the project, but reportedly use the same Indus Flyway
Route for migration.
The common birds include the House Crow, House Sparrow, Common Myna and Bank
Myna. These species are associated with the belas, which have enough tree cover. The
other species of such belas are Spotted Little Owlet, Common Cuckoo, Black Winged
Kite, Black Kite, Red Vented Bulbul, White Cheeked Bulbul, Hoopoe, Collard Dove,
Little Brown Dove, Red Turtle Dove and Common Starling. Similarly, the belas
occupied with the Saccharumgrass, are the habitat for Warblers, Black Drongo, Grey and
Black Partridges, Indian Silver Bill, Bee-eaters, Indian Tailor Bird, Indian Baya, Pied
Bush Chat, Rose-ringed Parakeet, Black Redstart, Indian Tree-pie and Jungle Babbler.
The oxbow lakes, seasonal marshes, river channels and stony belas with less vegetative
cover are the main habitat for the migratory waterfowl which spend winter in this habitat
or are the passage migrants in such areas. These include different species of Anatidae,
Herons, Egrets, Gulls, Cormorants, Terns, Grebes, and many species of waders. White
Breasted Kingfisher and Pied Kingfisher are the species of such habitats. The preference
of birds in these different habitats is because of their life style and food habits.
Results of present field surveys
During the present study in the Project area 12 mammal, 52 bird and 12 herp species
were recorded as compared to the 12 mammal species, 121 bird species expected and
only a small number of herp species reported from the areas surveyed for the GBHPP in
the years 1990-1991 and 2002-2003.
None of the species recorded during the surveys are included in the IUCN Red Data
Book. The Ferruginous duck (near threatened) was however reported to pass through the
Indus River corridor during surveys for the GBHPP, although this species was not
observed in the surveys.
The wildlife and wildlife habitat studies conducted for the Project were undertaken in the
following areas:
WAPDA
August 2011
6-24
Up to two km on the left and right side along the Indus River; and
Birds; and
Table 6.13 describes the faunal species identified at different Project areas during the
survey.
Table 6.13:
Location
Faunal Species
Large mammals: Asiatic jackal, common red fox, grey mongoose, jungle cat and wild
boar;
Powerhouse area
Small mammals: long-eared hedgehog, house bat, house rat, house mouse, northern
palm squirrel; and
Herps: Indus Valley toad, common tree lizard, spotted barn gecko, common house
gecko, Agrore Valley agama, rugose spectacled lacerta.
Large mammals: jungle cat and grey mongoose, wild boar;
site
Herps: Indus Valley toad, Agrore Valley agama, black rock agama, spotted barn gecko,
fat-tailed gecko, common house gecko, common tree lizard.
Mallards and dabbling duck.
Reservoir
Upstream slopes
Borrow areas
Small mammals: desert hare and northern palm squirrel, Indian gerbil, house rat,
house mouse; and
Herps: fat-tailed gecko, spotted barn gecko, Bengal monitor lizard, common tree Lizard,
rugose spectacled lacerta.
A full listing of the faunal species found in the Project area is provided in Annex B.
There were no endangered, threatened or vulnerable faunal species, as per IUCN Red
List, found in Project area. Bird species identified are also included in Annex B. No
endangered, rare or vulnerable bird species were observed in the Project area.
Bird Nesting Habitat
While surveying the area it was evident that there was no shortage of nesting habitat
available. The areas of impact are almost identical and provide all type of nesting and
feeding areas for the birds recorded in the area that are considered to have migrated to the
area.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-25
Barren stony slopes, boulders, fissures or hollows in boulders and the foot of steeper
cliffs;
Rodent burrows;
Brood parasites - some birds, e.g cuckoos, are known as brood parasites and infiltrate
the nests of crows and other birds to lay their eggs. The crows hatch the cuckoos
eggs and feed the babies until they fledge from the nests.
The prominent aquatic life of Indus at Tarbela includes fish, phytoplanktons (e.g
spirogyra) and zooplanktons (e.g paramecium) benthic insects, larvae of mayfly, caddis
fly mosquito larvae, dragon fly, stone fly and water mite.
Fish
According to the Fisheries department of KP, the dominant specie is Cepanous Corpio,
this is a self breeding fish and a multi breeder. It breeds three times a year and has many
newborn which survive easily. Raho, Grass carp, Silver carp, Mori and Thela breed in
months of April to July. Mallah and Masher are decreasing day by day due to their
feeding habits. These species live in flowing water but now the water is stagnant due to
construction of dam.
Trout does not breed in the Tarbela Reservoir as it is only present due to flooding from
snowy peaks and is found rarely. Cat fish like singhara, malhi, soul and snake head are
all carnivore species of the Indus River. Some important characteristics of Tarbela
Reservoir are provided in Table 6.14. A list of common fish species found in the
reservoir is given in Annex B.
Table 6.14:
Parameter
Description
25,900 ha
Reservoir level
Storage at maximum (Mm3)
3
WAPDA
August 2011
10,762
4,770
137.00
76.00
V-Shaped
Melted snow
6-26
Description
11-28
7.0-9.5
180-280
Oligotrophic
Fisheries
No fisheries activity in the private sector was found within or in the nearby vicinity of the
Project area. However WAPDA developed fish cultivation in the Tarbela Reservoir to
produce fish protein to meet the increasing demands of the growing population of
Pakistan. The fisheries are now managed by the fisheries department of the KP.
The principle of reservoir fishery management at Tarbela was to stock fish seed
hatcheries in order to rear fish up to a marketable size. Presently fishing rights for the
Tarbela Reservoir lie with the KP Province and revenue generated from the fisheries
sector is about PKR 0.5 million per year. Furthermore there are hundreds of fishermen
being employed by fishing contractors in the fishery business. Around 13,000 anglers
visit these reservoirs for recreation per annum.
In July 1997 the WAPDA Fisheries Department introduced Chinese Carp into the
Tarbela Reservoir for the following reasons:
It has a wide ranging diet (such as detritus, phytoplanktons, and zooplanktons); and
The existing natural fish species in the reservoir are minor and of less commercial
value although they do represent a good ecosystem.
In Annex B, more detail of the endemic and exotic species of the Tarbela and Ghazi
Barrage Reservoirs is given.
There have also been cases of Chinese Carp escaping into the Sirhin River from the
Ponds in Sirhin valley, ending up in Tarbela Reservoir. The introduction of Chinese
Carp, Sole and Toffee was to utilize the resources of the Tarbela Reservoir and also
because most of the endemic species are small and of no commercial importance, apart
from the Mahasher.
July and August are the close season for catching fish. The annual production of fish
during 2009-2010 was 67 metric tons. Any fishing is prohibited from 5 km upstream to
3 km downstream of the dam as there are security issues.
6.4
Social-economic Baseline
6.4.1 Overview
The social baseline describes the existing situation in the Project area and the potential
population that will be affected by the Project. As this is an extension of the original
Tarbela Project, there will not be resettlement and social issues directly associated with
the Project. However, there are some legacy issues around resettlement that are
attributable to the original Tarbela Project and this has therefore been included in the
social baseline. The direct Project area is already owned by WAPDA. The indirect
WAPDA
August 2011
6-27
Project area falls between the districts of Haripur and Swabi of the KP Province of
Pakistan. To establish a socio economic baseline, primary and secondary data was
collected on the prevailing socio-economic conditions including social and physical
infrastructure in Project area.
The District Population Census Reports, 1998 stated that population of the Swabi District
was 1.027 million while, that of Haripur district was 0.692 million with average annual
growth rate of 2.96 and 2.08 respectively. The estimated present population of the Swabi
and Haripur districts, is 1.47 million and 0.91 million respectively representing an annual
average growth rate of 2.8 and 2.2 respectively.
Main construction activities for the Project will remain confined to the Right Bank of the
Indus River. Table 6.15 presents basic characteristics of the population in Project area.
This shows that the estimated total population of the Project area is 36,250 with 4,387
households hence the average household size is 8.26.
Table 6.15:
Settlements
Households (No.)
16
150
750
5,000
300
2,100
1,200
13,000
170
1,200
Darra Mohat
160
1000
Kukar Chawa
35
250
Ghari Meera
456
4000
Sobra City
150
1050
600
3500
Qazi pur
550
5000
4,387
36,250
Right Bank
Burj (Khabbal)
Totals
Source:
WAPDA
August 2011
6-28
Being on the route of the conquerors of Central India, the tribes and castes of the districts
are a multitude of various races from the north. The key tribe in the Swabi district is
Yousaf zai, an off-shoot of Pathans. Resident in the District Razars are: Rajars; Utman;
Jadoon; Gadoon; and Khatak. In the Haripur district the Punjabis and Kashmiris are in
the majority as compared to Pathans. The key tribes and castes include: Tareen;
Dilazak;Tarkheli; Gujar; Awan; Mishwani; Pathan; Gakhar; Jdoon; Sayyed; Tanoli; and
Turks.
The majority of the people in the Project area are Pakhtun with the other key tribes,
baradaries or castes in the Project area being: Awan; Yousaf Zai; Syed; Mughal;
Mashwani; Bafanda; and some working classes (artisans).
In addition in the Hazara region there are three main districts: Mansehra; Abbotabad; and
Hari Pur. Generally the residents of these districts are called Hazrawal.
Language
Pushto is the dominant language spoken in the Swabi district by 96% of the population.
Punjabi, Sraiki and Urdu are the other, minor languages spoken. The mother tongue
spoken in the Haripur district is predominately Hindko with the other languages spoken
being similar to the Swabi district.
Within the Project area, the majority of the people speak Pashto and Hindko
however, in the Right Bank Colony people also speak Urdu and Saraiki.
Religion
According to the Population Census of 1998, about 97% of the population of the Swabi
and Haripur districts is Muslim, while the remaining 3% of the population consist of
minorities such as Ahmadis, Christians, Hindus and other scheduled castes. Scheduled
castes are the depressed and low rank classes as declared by the Scheduled Castes
(Declaration) Ordinance, 1957.
All people belong to the Muslim Sunni school of thought. There are many religious
institutions in Swabi where students from all over the province are seeking religious
education.
6.4.4
Economic Conditions
Occupation / Livelihood
The main occupation of the inhabitants of the Swabi district is agriculture and people are
mostly landless tenants. However, a few educated people are engaged in Government or
private service. The livelihood of the local population of the district mainly depends on
agriculture and livestock rearing. The livestock serves as an income source which they
sell to meet their needs. The people of the district live a simple life including the
standard of their clothing and their diet. Unemployment, lack of potable water, basic
health and education facilities, electricity and roads are the major issues for the people of
the district. Similarly, in Haripur district agriculture remains the main occupation of its
inhabitants. The proportion of people serving in the Government sector is higher due to
the existence of the Pakistan Telecommunication Industry in Haripur as well as the
Hazara Fertilizer Factory. There are also a large number of people serving in the Armed
Forces.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-29
Most of the people in the Project area are dependant upon labor. They work in nearby
cities, Gadoon industrial estate, Karachi and abroad. As there is no agricultural land
available within the hamlets of the Right Bank Colony, small businesses, shop keeping
and private or government service are the other occupations of the people in the Project
area.
Income
Under the prevailing socio-economic conditions in the districts, the income of an average
household is very low. However, a small number of the people had larger incomes.
According to the social impact assessment survey, the majority of the people in the
Project area belong to the low income group. The average monthly income ranged
between PKR 5,000 to PKR 7,000. This implies that the majority of people in the Project
area live below poverty line although residents of the Right Bank Colony have a better
living standard as many are WAPDA employees.
Livestock
Livestock is a prestigious symbol and an additional source of income for the farming
community, besides providing milk, ghee and meat. Information relating to livestock in
the Swabi and Haripur districts is presented in Table 6.16 below and indicates that,
among dairy animals, cattle and sheep are more prevalent in the Swabi district. In the
Haripur district, there are more buffalo and goats than in the Swabi district. Among load
carrying animals, donkeys are the highest in number (53,837), followed by horses,
(3,928) and mules (485) with load carrying animals higher in number in the Swabi
district when compared to the Haripur district.
Table 6.16:
Item
Swabi
Haripur
Total
Cattle
170,507
96,388
266,895
Buffalo
71,118
93,799
16,491
Sheep
15,660
10,327
25,987
Goat
93,302
149,982
243,284
Camel
821
423
1,244
Horse
2,658
1,270
3,928
265
221
485
34,754
19,083
53,837
813,820
596,471
1,410,291
Mule
Donkey
Poultry
Source:
Industry
WAPDA
August 2011
6-30
Credit plays important role in the lives of the poor and lower middle class families in
Project area. There are two major source of credit, institutional and non institutional.
The availability of institutional credit is very limited in the Project area mainly due to a
lack of knowledge and also the high rate of interest charged on loans. The main users of
non institutional credit are shop keepers and relatives of well-off families in the
settlements. These loans are mainly used for domestic and social needs such as
marriages, birth ceremonies, funerals, health and education.
Banking
Banking services are available in the Tarbela colonies on the Left Bank for WAPDA
employees. The residents of the surrounding areas have to go to Topi and Ghazi for
banking services although it is considered that sufficient banking facilities are available
at these places.
The baseline data provided in the following sections mainly represent data collated from
the District Census Report of Swabi and Haripur, 1998. Any other data for the Project
area has been collected during field survey work.
The villages for which social survey work was undertaken are shown below in Figure 6.8
whilst the social infrastructure of the Project Area is depicted in Figure 6.9.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-31
Figure 6.8:
WAPDA
August 2011
6-32
Figure 6.9:
WAPDA
August 2011
6-33
Health Facilities
The health facilities available within the jurisdiction of the Districts Swabi and Haripur
are shown in Table 6.17 below.
Table 6.17:
Health Facility
Swabi
Hospitals
Haripur
3
41
39
Dispensaries
12
Source:
The above table shows that health facilities available in both Districts are more or less
similar with minor variation depending on the distance to the source of service. Swabi
district has a greater number of basic health centers whilst Haripur district has a greater
number of dispensaries and rural health centers. It is evident from the above information
that hospitalization, rural health centers and mother/child centers are rare in both the
Districts.
The health facilities for the Project area are provided below in Table 6.18.
Due to the poor living conditions of the population, particularly in Project areas where
there are unhygienic living conditions and lack of potable water, there are many diseases,
the most common diseases prevalent in the area are malaria, diarrhea, hepatitis and skin
diseases.
Table 6.18:
Village
Facility
Status
Right Bank
Burj (Khabbal)
Nil
Nil
Hospital
Civil Hospital
Dispensary
Pontian
Nil
Nil
Darra Mohat
Nil
Nil
Kukar Chawa
Nil
Nil
Ghari Meera
Nil
Nil
Sobra City
Hospital
Adequate
Left Bank
WAPDA
August 2011
facilities
are
6-34
Facility
Status
available in the hospital
Ghazi Hamlet
Dispensary
Medicines.
Qazipur
Dispensary
Medicines.
Education Facilities
The Swabi district is blessed with a higher standard institution named the Ghulam Ishaq
Khan Institute of Engineering, Science and Technology (GIKIEST) situated at Topi.
Apart from this institute, there is also a Polytechnique Institute and a Commerce College
in the district. In the Haripur district there is a Post Graduate College, a Poly Technique
Institute and a Commerce College. All of these facilities are mainly for males, the details
of those attending these educational facilities who are inhabitants of the districts are
provided in Table 6.19. This data has been taken from the 1998 census data and not all
data was available for both districts, there are therefore some gaps in the table.
Table 6.19:
Institute
Swabi District
Haripur District
Male
Female
Total
Male
Female
Total
Degree College
Inter College
Elementary College
Higher Secondary
High School
65
21
86
63
15
78
Middle School
51
25
76
56
27
83
Primary School
496
388
864
656
251
907
20
20
Mosque School
76
Community and
14
School
Elementary Primary
School
Japan International
Cooperation Agency
(JICA) Model School
Like health facilities, education facilities in the Project area are not considered
satisfactory. The overall picture of educational facilities in Project area is provided in
Table 6.20 and it can be concluded that better education facilities are available at the
WAPDA
August 2011
6-35
Right Bank Colony. There are high schools for girls and boys with qualified staff and a
proper building. Science and computer laboratories are also available in the schools.
Although a high school for boys and girls exists at both the hamlets and in the Topi area,
there is a shortage of proper staff, furniture, science and computer laboratories.
Buildings are old and are insufficient for the existing number of students.
A degree level education facility is available in both the Ghazi and Topi areas.
Table 6.20:
Village
Facility
Gender
Remarks
Primary school
Boys
Right Bank
Burj (Khabbal)
High school
Boys
High school
Girls
Mohallah Zakoo,
Primary school
Boys
Topi
Primary school
Girls
High school
Boys
High school
Girls
Pontian
Primary school
Boys
Darra Mohat
Primary school
Primary school
High school
Left Bank
Kukar Chawa
Ghari Meera
Ghazi Hamlet
Nil
Primary school
High school
Source:
Literacy
A person who can read and write statements with an understanding, in any language
prevalent in Pakistan, is considered as literate. The literacy ratio is measured as the
number of literate people compared to the population of the age of 10 years and above.
According to the population Census of1998, in the Swabi district 36% of the population
are literate whereas in the Haripur district a much higher percentage of the population is
literate at 53.7%. The literacy rate in the Project area is therefore lower than the national
level of 57%.
Housing
It is evident from the 1998 Census that in the Swabi district around two thirds (65.4%) of
the households use wood as the construction material in the roofs of their buildings, while
22.6% use reinforced cement, concrete or bricks. Approximately 10% of all houses use
WAPDA
August 2011
6-36
cement or iron sheets in the roofs. The remaining 12% of households use other materials.
Separate kitchens, bathrooms and latrines are available in 58.3% of all housing units.
In the Haripur district the situation was different, Reinforced Cement Concrete (RCC) /
Reinforced Brick Concrete (RBC) was the main (45.3 %) roofing material of the
households. Wood and bamboo were utilized in 39.4% with cement and bricks used in
11.7% and the remaining 3.7% using other materials. Separate kitchens, bathrooms and
latrines are available for households with 48.4%, 46.1% and 41.0% respectively in the
Haripur district.
There is a mixture of Pacca (permanent structure with concrete roofing), Semi Pacca
(brick walls but corrugated galvanized iron roofing) and Kacha (grass-thatched/mud
covered) houses in the Project area apart from the Right Bank Colony where all the
houses were Pacca. In total there were 80% of Pacca houses in Project area with the
remaining 20% falling into the Kacha and Semi Pacca category. It was observed that all
the people were living in self owned houses except on the Right Bank Colony, which is
property of WAPDA.
Sources of Drinking Water
The following data has been collated from the District Census Reports of Swabi and
Haripur, 1998.
Residents of the districts of Swabi and Haripur have access to two types of drinking
water, within the house and outwith house. On an overall basis, 79.4% of households had
access to a drinking water facility within the house with the remaining 20.6% having to
fetch water from outwith the house.
The proportion of households fetching water was higher in rural areas as compared to
urban localities (22.2% versus 13.0 %). It is important to note that 61.3% of households
rely on wells for drinking water and this percentage was higher (70.7%) in urban
settlements when compared to rural areas (59.3%). A higher proportion of resident
(55.2%) of the Haripur district had access to water within their houses as compared to
outwith the house (44.8%). However, the trend is similar to that of the Swabi district.
A significantly higher proportion of households in the Haripur district have access to tap
water is in both urban and rural localities (91.3% and 44.1% respectively) when
compared to the households of the Swabi district. Only 15.3% of households in the
Swabi district had access to piped water which is considered relatively safe quality. A
nominal proportion of urban households and all households in rural areas were getting
drinking water from village ponds in both districts which is the most dangerous quality of
water. More detail on the above information is provided below in Table 6.21.
Table 6.21:
Source
Haripur
Rural
Urban
All
Rural
Urban
All
Inside
77.8
87.0
79.4
50.4
92.2
55.2
Pipe (Nul)
11.0
10.5
10.9
44.1
91.3
49.6
Hand Pump
18.1
13.1
17,2
0.3
0.4
0.3
Well
48,7
63.4
51.3
6.0
0.5
5.3
Outwith
22.2
13.0
20.6
49.6
7.8
44.8
WAPDA
August 2011
6-37
Haripur
Rural
Urban
All
Rural
Urban
All
Pipe (Nul)
4.9
2.,1
4.4
16.9
5.3
15.6
Hand Pump
1.3
0.8
1.3
0.6
0,4
0.6
Well
10.6
7.3
10.0
14.4
0.9
12.8
Pond
0.8
0.6
2.1
1.8
Others
4.6
2.8
4.3
15.6
1.2
14.0
A tapped water supply is considered to be the most hygienic source of drinking water,
which is available only in the WAPDA colonies and to a limited number of people in
Project area. A water supply system is partially available in the hamlets but was
dysfunctional at the time of ESA survey. At the Right Bank Topi area, the drinking
water is polluted due to severe seepage problems and most of the people in the Project
area use untreated water. The ground water is contaminated by sewage, especially in the
Topi area.
In the WAPDA Colonies drinking water is sourced by ground water pumped through
deep tubewells. As described earlier, the drinking water quality sampling and analysis by
SGS Pakistan (Pvt.) Limited at the WAPDA showed a Total Bacterial Colony Count that
exceeded permissible limits.
Sanitation
The sanitation conditions of the Haripur district are relatively better than those in the
Swabi district, especially in the rural areas. Urban settlements have drainage facilities
and in the WAPDA Colonies there is an improperly functioning sanitation system which
limited its proper and environmentally safe use. In the hamlets and the Topi area, an
open drainage system is available but there are no arrangement for the disposal of
domestic solid waste and sewage. People drain out used water in open places, similarly
the open dumping of solid waste is normal practice in the Project area.
Electricity
According to the District Census Reports of Swabi and Haripur, 1998, the majority of
houses (83.4%) are equipped with the electricity as the source of lighting, both in urban
and rural areas. The Project area is connected with a nearby national grid system
however, shortage of electricity and load shedding is normal practice in the area as with
other parts of the country.
Tele Communication
The District Census Reports of Swabi and Haripur, 1998 disclose that there are 22
telephone exchanges functioning in the Swabi district as well as one Head Post Office, 27
Sub Post Offices and 65 Branch Post Offices. In the Haripur district there are 18
telephone exchanges in operation while and one Head Post Office, 26 Sub Post Offices
and 74 Branch Post Offices functioning in the district. The comparative analysis of the
situation reveals that telecommunication facilities in both districts have a nominal
variation.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-38
The telecommunication services are available in and around the Project area. The
services of all the mobile providers are available in the Project area. Pakistan
Telecommunication Company Ltd. is also providing land lines and wireless telephone
services in the area.
Road Network
There is a chain of national, district and rural roads available in the Swabi district. Farms
are linked to markets by a roads network. Completion of the M1 project (Motorway
between Peshawar and Islamabad) has also improved links from and to the district with
other cities. According to the Census of 1998 the total length of roads in the district was
335 km whereas the Haripur district is linked with the famous Shahr-e-Resham
(Karakoram Highway) through Hazro road. Haripur is also linked with Taxila (Punjab)
via Khanpur. A road from Haripur city leads to Ghazi and there is also a network of
farms to market roads. The total length of the roads in the Haripur district is 260 km.
The Tarbela Dam is approximately 110 km away from Islamabad. The Project area is
linked by road directly with Islamabad and Peshawar via Motorway and Grand Trunk
(GT) Roads. One can use Burhan and Swabi interchanges on the Motorway to reach
Tarbela. A link road from the Grand Trunk (GT) Road leads to Tarbela. These routes
can be used for the transportation of construction material. The village of Darra Mohat,
located 1 km upstream of the dam site as shown in the various maps and figures
contained in this report, is divided into two parts in the months of July to October every
year due to rise of water in the reservoir which submerges the connecting road and people
cross the river by boat.
6.4.6 Grazing
The Project site is restricted and fenced to prevent grazing animals from penetrating the
area. However the families living in the Right Bank Colony use the Right Bank Colony
barracks as animal sheds. As these barracks are one of the options being considered for
the new labor camps, so these animals may be disturbed. People living in other villages
within the Project area of influence also have domestic animals but these villages are
further away from the Project site. Similarly, on the Left Bank a limited number of
animals are reared that graze on the open areas within the colonies. Overall there is
limited grazing pressure on the wild flora growing in the Project area therefore no
disturbance is expected to the grazing activity of these animals.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-39
6.4.9
NGOs
The NGO sector has made enormous contributions to the economic development in
Pakistan. The Ghazi Barotha Taraqiati Idara (GBTI) and Sungi Development Foundation
are of note and are mentioned as they work actively in Tarbela Project area. GBTI was
the project NGO for Ghazi Barotha Hydro Power project; in addition they are working
with communities in the health and education sectors. Pakistan and provincial KP Rural
Support Programs are also working in the Haripur and Swabi districts.
Mechanism for resolving disputes
According to the ESA Survey, people have various disputes and conflicts on different
issues, like other parts of the country. However, they resolve their minor disputes
through the heads of families while major disputes are resolved through the Jirga (a tribal
assembly of elders that make decisions by consensus). In case of serious matters, local
influential politicians intervene to settle the dispute. Police and the court of law is the
last option.
Gender issues are gaining importance in development projects because female members
of the community are generally neglected while designing, assessing and implementing
such projects. Females are generally more vulnerable than male members of the society
and the Project is no exception to this.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-40
The following information was collected through Rapid Social Appraisal (RSA) and
Focused Group Discussion (FGD) at village level. The RSA and FGDs were not
undertaken with the male community however the overall demand chart is provided in
the SIMF where the most expressed pressing needs of the male population was identified
as:
Employment;
Recreation activities.
All women consulted fall within the age group of 20 to 60 years old with an average age
of 40 years. Of the total women consulted, 77% were married, 17% unmarried and the
remaining 4% were widowed. On average a married women had 3.7 children.
Literacy Status
Of the participating women, 46% were literate having received formal and/or informal
education. Table 6.22 below shows that around 25.5% of literate women held a
graduation degree (i.e. 4 years of schooling), whereas around 18.6% held the degree of
Fellow of Arts (FA) 12 years education) and the same applied to the Master of Arts (MA)
16 years of education). This shows an overall higher level of education achievement and
propensity of gaining an education among the literate women of the Project area.
Table 6.22:
Education Level
Respondents (No.)
Percentage (%)
Primary
4.6
Middle
14.1
Matriculation
18.6
FA
18.6
11
25.5
18.6
46
100
ESA Consultation
Occupational Status
Table 6.23 below shows that around 65.6% of the women consulted are housewives and
remain engaged on a full time basis in household chores including food preparation,
cleaning, housekeeping, caring and rearing of children and taking care of old and sick
members of the family. About 18% of the women were contributing to the household
income through both indoor and outdoor activities such as teaching, dress making and
shop keeping. Women are also engaged in undocumented and informal rural economy
such as the raring of animals.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-41
Table 6.23:
Occupation
Respondents (No.)
Percentage (%)
House Wife
63
65.6
Teacher
12
12.5
Student
11
11.4
Dress Maker
3.2
Shopkeeper
2.1
Nothing
5.2
96
100.0
Total
Note: few women (2.1%) of the Right Bank Colony were members of the womens club.
Off the total participating women, 51.2% were involved in the decision making process
relating to important issues such as the sale and purchase of property and the schooling
and marriages of their children. However, a vast majority of women (83.3%) were of the
view that, despite all the discussions around making a decision, the final decision power
lies with the male head of the family. A small number of respondents (5.2%) had the
right of ownership of the property.
Skills
Some 41% of the participating women possessed different skills e.g. embroidery and
stitching, which provided a minor source of income generation.
Health Status
Table 6.24 below indicates that 49.6% of the responses received were for availing health
facilities at the government health centers which include indoor hospitalization facilities.
However, the availability of professional, semi-professional and occupational medical
staff and the quality of related services remained an open question. There were 24% of
the responses in favour of relying on private medical facilities, including paramedical
practitioners. It is worth noting that the villages named as Khabbal, Darra Mohat and
Kukar Chawa did not have any access to either medical practitioners or any basic health
unit.
Table 6.24:
Health Centre
Respondents (No.)
Percentage (%)
3.5
Dispensary
24
17
Private Doctor
34
24.3
Hospital
70
49.6
5.6
141
100
Hakeem / Practitioner
Total
WAPDA
August 2011
6-42
Women were asked about the most common diseases prevalent in the Project area.
According Table 6.25 below, the common most diseases prevalent in the Project area
were: Diarrhea (32.7%); Typhoid (27.3%); Hepatitis (9.2%); Measles (6.4%); and
Malaria (5%).
Table 6.25:
Disease
Response (No.)
Percentage (%)
Diarrhea
72
32.7
Measles
14
6.4
3.6
Hepatitis
20
9.2
Typhoid
60
27.3
Tuberculosis
4.0
Skin Diseases
4.1
Eye diseases
2.7
Chickenpox
2.7
11
5.0
220
100.0
Pneumonia
Malaria
Total
Data was collected from the women on their pressing needs to disseminate the benefits
of the Project to the surrounding communities. The most important needs felt by the
women folk were: provision of vocational/ training facilities (25.5%); access to health
facilities (24.4%); improved educational facilities (19%); and some felt their needs were
comprised on basic necessities such as gas, electricity and drinking water, as depicted in
Table 6.26.
Table 6.26:
Needs
Response* (No.)
Percentage (%)
44
24.4
34
19.0
46
25.5
12
6.7
44
24.4
180
100.0
Total
* There were multiple responses received
Skill Development
A majority of the women (72%) were interested in receiving training in different skill
types. The skill development training required most by women is sewing (34%) followed
by embroidery (29%) and handicrafts (21%). Such training could provide opportunities
for income generation. Some 16% of the literate women were interested in receiving
computer training. Women preference for development in their skills is given below.
Table 6.27 provides the source data.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-43
Table 6.27:
Skill / Training
Response* (No.)
Percentage (%)
Sewing
55
34
Embroidery
47
29
Handicrafts
34
21
Computer Course
26
16
162
100
Total
10 pending with the High Court Peshawar Circuit Bench at Abbotabad; and
Of the 40 cases, 26 were submitted by PAPs, 11 were filed by WAPDA and three related
to land possession and were filed by PAP versus PAP. The total disputed amount from
the Tarbela resettlement claims and related issues was PKR 182,437,263 as of June 2010,
of this, PKR 13,621,218 was claimed by WAPDA in respect of recovery for over
payment, an amount of PKR 168,816,045 was claimed by PAPs for compensation
package enhancement, interest and compensation against land. In 2003, WAPDA
deposited its share for potential compensation payments with the Government of Pakistan
treasuries in various national investment schemes.
The World Commission on Dams 1999 case study on Tarbela identified three main
factors as to why resettlement impacts and claims were not closed out for Tarbela as
follows:
The refusal of the Sindh Government to provide the balance of the 7,800 ha out of
12,000 ha which it had committed to provide to PAPs; and
WAPDA also developed 311 residential and commercial plots for allotment to
eligible PAPs of Kala Dhaka in the New Darbad Township Extension Scheme.
However, Kala Dhaka affectees refused to accept allotment of these plots on the plea
that all 1,280 PAPs may be provided residential plots grouped in one
hamlet/township. Therefore this issue remains unsettled because of non-availability
of the desired number of plots. Previously the Kala Dhaka PAPs had refused to
accept agricultural land in Sindh.
WAPDA
August 2011
6-44
Risk of Earthquakes
The Project area is located in a part of Pakistan where earthquakes frequently occur,
though usually these are not of an exceptional magnitude. Tarbela is situated in the
foothills of the Himalaya and Karakorum mountains. These mountain ranges were
uplifted through the collision of the Indian and Eurasian tectonic plates. The zone of the
main trust between the plates is located northeast of the project site at a distance 100- 200
km in Kohistan and Kashmir. However, the influence of associated local tectonic fault
breaks can continue until the project area as far as the Potwar (or Potohar) plateau, which
is situated south of the project area. High incidence of seismic activity through tectonical
movements of local faults can be responsible for rupture of ground surface, ground
acceleration, failures of natural slopes, and ground liquefaction.
The largest recent earthquake in the area was the 2005 NWFP/Kashmir earthquake with a
magnitude of 7.6 on the Richter scale. More than 73,000 people were killed through this
earthquake and 450,000 people made homeless. The epicenter was located at a distance
of about 100 km northeast from Tarbela. The major earthquake was followed by a large
number of aftershocks. The magnitude of 7.6 is exceptional (calculated frequency of once
every 330 years). Most earthquakes in the area have a magnitude up to 6.4. As long as the
process of mountain uplifting continues in the northern areas the project should be spared
from major earthquakes with magnitudes in excess of 7. However, there is no guarantee
that a local fault does not break and causes an earthquake. There is an active tectonic
fault (the Darband fault) at the site which may displace by about 1.2 m. This makes the
risk of failure of slopes and liquefaction of near-surface soil quite high, unless
appropriate engineering measures are implemented to reduce these risks.
7.2
Risk of Flooding
Since its creation, Pakistan has faced eight severe floods. The floods of 1950, 1988, 1992
and 1998 resulted in a large number of deaths and severe loss of property, while the July
2010 floods have been described as the worst in the last eighty years. In July and August
2010 heavy monsoon rainfall in the northwest of the country caused flash and heavy
riverine floods. Starting in the valleys of the Swat and Kabul rivers the flood peak after
flooding large areas in KP province joined the Indus waters at Attock and travelled
downstream through the densely populated irrigation areas in Punjab and Sindh and
flooding large areas with around 8,000 deaths and nearly 20 million people being
significantly affected through loss of housing, property, crops, and income.
During these floods the Tarbela reservoir experienced a historically high peak discharge
of the Indus of 23,650 m/sec, but this was considerably below the design discharge of
42,400 m/sec. Reservoir and dam could therefore relatively easily cope with these high
floods. Through operation of the reservoir the peak outflow at Tarbela even could be
reduced with some 28 percent. There was no damage at Tarbela or surrounding areas.
The conclusion is that although the risk of flooding in the Indus Basin might increase in
the coming years due to rising air temperature, shift in rainfall pattern and increased
melting of glaciers in the upstream regions (see Section 6.3) the risk of flooding and
related damage in the Tarbela area is very low.
WAPDA
August 2011
7-1
Floods in the northern areas of Pakistan, including the upper part of the Indus catchment
are not only associated with extreme rainfall events, but they can also occur after
landslides and creation of river-dams and subsequent flood waves. However these
flooding events are usually restricted to tributary areas and may have impacts on the
upper Indus valley, but not on Tarbela.
7.3
Climate Change
Climate change is being considered as a critical factor behind changing rainfall patterns,
the visible increase in precipitation during monsoon seasons, and more frequent
extremely dry periods. Also the influence of climate change on air temperature such as
minimum and maximum averages and the frequency of heat waves is often mentioned.
More than 13 percent of the Upper Indus Basin consists of glaciers and the melting of ice
caps and retreat of glaciers is attributed to climate change. All these results have a
considerable influence on the hydrology of the Indus Basin, the water availability and on
the occurrence of floods and droughts.
During the last decade a lot of research is carried out to study the effects of long-term
climate change on precipitation, air temperatures, and droughts. Some of the main
conclusions of these studies are the following:
between 1980 and 2005 the frequency of heat waves (T> 40 C) has been increased
in north-western Pakistan. It is expected that there will be more frequent periods with
extreme drought;
more heavy rainfall events during monsoon season will occur over north-western
Pakistan instead of the north-east of the country. Some models calculate 25 percent
more rainfall during monsoon. As a result, areas along the western rivers of the
country (Indus and Kabul) will be more vulnerable to flood episodes similar to the
one experienced during 2010;
water availability might increase considerably (during kharif) but not when it is
required for agriculture (rabi season);
a shift has been observed in the rainfall pattern with monsoons starting 1-2 weeks
earlier and winter rains confined towards February;
Recent studies have been concentrated on the effects of glacial melt. Major issues to
be investigated are amongst others:
the importance of the contribution of snow and glacial melt on the hydrology of the
Indus;
From these studies it has been concluded that glaciers in the Himalaya and Karakorum
are receding faster than happens in any other part of the world. From digital terrain
models and satellite observations it might be concluded that the reduction of the thickness
of ice in the Western Himalayan glaciers ranges between 0.50 to 0.90 m per year,
WAPDA
August 2011
7-2
although in some areas in the Karakorum an extension and increase of glaciers has also
been reported. A recent study (Immerzeel et al, 2010) suggests that 60 percent of the
discharge in the Indus catchment is fed by melting of glaciers and snow. This is a very
high percentage as compared to other major rivers originating in the Himalayas, such as
Brahmaputra, Ganges and Yellow River. In a likely scenario of global warming based on
IPPC predictions the reduction of the share of melt-water in the Indus discharge has been
estimated at 8.4 percent. However this could be (over)compensated by an expected
increase of the precipitation during monsoon in the area of 25 percent.
The relation between climate change and hydrology is extremely complex. This is
because the high variability in data on climate and hydrology, requiring long time series
and proper monitoring. Moreover regional circumstances might vary considerably,
especially in high mountain areas. This often leads to conflicting data. More studies and
more reliable data should be collected in the coming years. In view of the importance of
these data for developing reliable and accurate knowledge of the basin hydrology and on
future water availability of the Indus River it is recommended that the current project
contributes to these studies with a Glacial Monitoring Program (Component C4: US$ 6
million). In the ESMP more details of such a study are presented and a cost estimate is
given. This program includes extensive glacial studies, including satellite monitoring and
studies into the effects of glacial outbursts.
WAPDA
August 2011
7-3
General
Potential adverse effects of the T4HP project on ecosystems and their inhabitants,
humans, animals and plants are described in this chapter. The impacts of the project on
social structures and relations will be dealt with in Chapter 9. Adverse environmental
impacts under the project are expected to be rather limited mainly because dam,
reservoir, and power generating facilities are already in place. Construction operations
will be concentrated on a limited project area concentrated around the inlet gates of
Tunnels 3 and 4, the outlet of Tunnel 4, the site and steep slope above the new power
house to be constructed and the existing switch yard which will be extended further
downstream. The area of influence of the project is larger and covers some 5 km
upstream in the Reservoir including its embankments and 10 km downstream of the dam
until the two cities of Ghazi and Topi at respectively the left and the right bank. Also
included are the borrow and disposal areas in the vicinity of the project and the access
roads to the project.
8.2.1 Magnitude
The assessment of magnitude will be undertaken in two steps. Firstly the key issues
associated with the Project are categorized as beneficial or adverse. Secondly, impacts
will be categorized as major, moderate, minor or negligible based on consideration of the
parameters such as:
Reversibility;
Likelihood; and
WAPDA
August 2011
8-1
Table 8.1:
Parameter
Major
Duration of
impact
Moderate
Long term
Medium Term
(more than 35
years)
Lifespan of the
project
Minor
Negligible
Temporary with
no detectable
impact
(5 to 15 years)
Spatial extent of
the impact
Widespread far
beyond project
component site
boundaries
Beyond immediate
project components,
site boundaries or
local area
Within project
components and
site boundary
Specific location
within project
component or
site boundaries
with no
detectable
impact
Reversibility of
impacts
Impact is
effectively
permanent,
requiring
considerable
intervention to
return to baseline
Baseline requires a
year or so with some
interventions to
return to baseline
Baseline returns
naturally or with
limited
intervention within
a few months
Baseline remains
constant
Legal standards
and established
professional
Breaches national
limits and or
international
guidelines
Meets minimum
national standard
limits or
international
guidelines
Not applicable
Occurs under
typical operating or
construction
conditions
Occurs under
abnormal,
exceptional or
emergency
conditions
Unlikely to occur
criteria
Likelihood of
impacts
occurring
Source:
Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Volume II, Judith Petts, 1999. Blackwell Science Ltd.
8.2.2 Sensitivity
The sensitivity of a receptor will be determined based on review of the population
(including proximity / numbers / vulnerability) and presence of features on the site or the
surrounding area. Criteria for determining sensitivity of receptors are outlined in
Table 8.2 below. Each assessment will define sensitivity in relation to their topic.
Table 8.2:
Sensitivity Determination
Definition
Very High
High
WAPDA
August 2011
8-2
Definition
Medium
Low / Negligible
Source: Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment, Volume II, Judith Petts, 1999. Blackwell Science ltd.
High
Medium
Low /
Negligible
Major
Critical
Major
Moderate
Negligible
Moderate
Major
Major
Moderate
Negligible
Minor
Moderate
Moderate
Low
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Negligible
Magnitude of Impact
A great number of potential impacts can either be avoided or reduced through mitigation;
however some residual environmental impacts may be unavoidable. The ESA has
assessed whether residual impacts, either beneficial or adverse, remain after mitigation.
Where appropriate, enhancement measures are identified to create new positive impacts
or benefits, increase the reach of positive impacts or benefits, or distribute them more
equitably.
8.2.5 Uncertainty
An ESA involves prediction and thus uncertainty is an integral part. The main types of
uncertainty and the ways in which they can be minimized are summarized as follows:
Uncertainty of prediction: this is important at the data collection stage and the final
certainty will only be resolved once implementation commences. Research can
reduce the uncertainty;
WAPDA
August 2011
8-3
Uncertainty of values: this reflects the approach taken in the ESA process. Final
certainty will be determined at the time decisions are made.
Improved
communications and extensive negotiations would reduce this uncertainty;
Uncertainty of related decision: this affects the decision making element of the ESA
process and final certainty will be determined by post evaluation. Improved
coordination will reduce uncertainty.
8.3
The projects potential environmental impacts and their significance have been assessed
using the methodology described in Section 8.2 above. A summary of these impacts and
their significance is presented in Table 8.4.
WAPDA
August 2011
8-4
Table 8.4:
Impacts
Phase
Pre-construction
Receptor
Impact
Sensitivity
Magnitude
Low
Minor
Significance Prior
to Mitigation and
Enhancement
Low Adverse
Change; preparation of
Residual
Significance
Negligible
construction facilities
Contractor mobilization
Pre-construction
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
Low Adverse
Topography:
Construction and
Medium
Major
Moderate Adverse
Negligible
Decommissioning
All Phases
High
Major
Major Adverse
Low Adverse
WAPDA
August 2011
Construction:
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
Negligible
8-5
Impacts
Phase
Receptor
Impact
Sensitivity
Magnitude
Significance Prior
to Mitigation and
Enhancement
Residual
Significance
around 5%.
Operation:
High
Moderate
Major Adverse
Negligible
Construction and
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
De-
commissioning
Low adverse
Low
Minor
Negligible
Negligible
Construction:
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
Negligible
De-
commissioning:
Medium
Minor
Low Adverse
staff training;
all sanitary effluent will be treated prior to discharge;
treatment plant will conform to international standards;
drainage system will be designed so that all spills will be
drained and collected in a sump for further appropriate
disposal; and
Oil and chemical storage and vehicle wash and oil
change facilities will be on an impermeable surface to
avoid percolation.
reduce volume of material requiring disposal;
Wastes:
Construction and
De-
commissioning:
WAPDA
August 2011
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
Negligible
8-6
Impacts
Phase
Receptor
Impact
Sensitivity
Magnitude
Significance Prior
to Mitigation and
Enhancement
Waste Management Plans; and
Low
Minor
Negligible
Residual
Significance
camp wastes
Landslides:
Construction:
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
slope stabilization;
Low Adverse
Low
Minor
Negligible
commissioning:
Construction:
Medium
Minor
Low Adverse
Negligible/
Positive
Decommissioning
Low
Minor
Negligible
Beneficial
Construction and
De-
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
Negligible
commissioning
Noise:
Construction and
vehicle movement;
De-
operating machinery;
commissioning
WAPDA
August 2011
Medium
Major
Moderate Adverse
Ambient noise:
Low Adverse
8-7
Impacts
Phase
Receptor
Impact
Sensitivity
Magnitude
Significance Prior
to Mitigation and
Enhancement
Residual
Significance
blasting
Minor
Negligible
Construction and
Construction:
De-
excavation works;
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
Landscape Plan.
Positive
Beneficial
commissioning
Operation
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Beneficial
Construction and
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
Negligible/low
De-
adverse
commissioning
construction of temporary
access roads;
transport of construction labor;
WAPDA
August 2011
8-8
Impacts
Phase
Receptor
Impact
Sensitivity
Magnitude
Significance Prior
to Mitigation and
Enhancement
Residual
Significance
Construction
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
Negligible
Flora / Vegetation:
Construction and
De-
Medium
Major
Major Adverse
commissioning
Positive
Beneficial
Fish:
Potentially All
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
Negligible
Construction and
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
Negligible
Operation
WAPDA
August 2011
8-9
8.4
WAPDA
August 2011
8-10
Figure 8.1:
WAPDA
August 2011
8-11
8.4.3
Traffic and transportation impacts will start during the mobilization of the contractor and
will continue during the entire construction period. The Project is implemented in a
remote area and existing traffic density and volume is not high however, when
mobilization and construction commences, traffic intensity will rise significantly as a
result of the following activities:
The construction of temporary access roads as the main Right Bank Colony road
runs through where the powerhouse construction site is likely to be;
Delivery of resources (materials, plant and labor) to the work site; and
It is estimated that during construction traffic volume on the roads leading to the Project
area will increase by more than 200 additional vehicles (including trucks) per day. Heavy
transport of materials will cause congestions in urban areas and along access roads to the
project. Especially local roads are not designed for carrying heavy traffic and this may
result in considerable damage to local roads. The impact on road safety and increased
risk of accidents will be dealt with in the next chapter.
Mitigation
Prevention and mitigation can be achieved by preparing a traffic management plan which
indicates the designated areas and access roads for vehicles and moving equipment to be
used, speed limits to be applied, the possible bypass in urban centers and the
responsibilities in case of repair of damages to roads. This plan would be prepared by the
Contractor prior to mobilization. The need for temporary bypass road and/or access roads
and traffic measures in urban centers would be established and agreed with WAPDA and
local authorities. The contractor will be required to submit the TMP to the Supervision
Consultants/ESMU/WAPDA Environmental Cell (WEC) for their review and approval
before the plan is implemented.
8.5
8.5.1
The potential areas where topography will change as a result of blasting, cutting,
excavation and dumping activities include the new powerhouse site, penstock route,
intake area, part of the road connecting the existing powerhouse with Right Bank Colony,
borrow sites and dumping sites for excavated material.
Different types of construction materials will be required in implementing the project.
Some of these can be obtained by dredging or excavating material (e.g. fine and coarse
sands) from the Indus river bed and sand banks at suitable locations. Other materials will
be taken from quarries and borrow pits (e.g. rip rap, material for stone pitching and rock).
Borrow materials would be obtained (as much as possible) from licensed quarries and
borrow areas. Where necessary, appropriate restoration of the borrow area such as recontouring would be carried out, and no deep ditches would be left behind. Material
excavated by the project, and of suitable grade can also qualify as a source of
construction material to be (re)used in the project (e.g. quartzites and other durable
WAPDA
August 2011
8-12
rocks). Other excavated materials of poor construction quality estimated at 1.5 million m
will have to be disposed at suitable sites, e.g. in nearby disused quarries or borrow pits.
The total quantity of material to be excavated from the powerhouse site, the intakes and
slope excavations is estimated at 900,000 m3. The Project has been designed to use most
of the excavated material in the construction of a raised platform for the switchyard in the
Ghazi-Barotha lake bed. Any remaining spoil will be deposited in a depression not far
from the powerhouse on the Right Bank. Disposal of these materials may create
environmental impacts such as an increase in dust pollution, landscape degradation,
erosion and an increase in sedimentation of the Ghazi barrage pond and the Barotha
powerhouse head pond.
Mitigation
To reduce the adverse impacts of deposition of excavated material the emphasis will be
on reducing the volume of material requiring disposal as far as possible. Remaining
material will be disposed in an environmentally sound manner. Disposal sites will be
properly filled, shaped and reworked and where feasible planted with trees. Borrow
materials would be obtained (as much as possible) from licensed quarries and borrow
areas. Where necessary, appropriate restoration of the borrow area such as re-contouring
would be carried out, and no deep ditches would be left behind. Contractors would
follow the guidelines presented in the ECP 7, Borrow Areas Development and Operation.
8.5.2
There will be no impact on water availability for downstream areas, since the other
tunnels can easily supply the water needed for irrigation. During construction, Tunnel 4
will be out of use in three different periods. The longest closure will be when at the
downstream end of Tunnel 4 the power branch has to be connected to the tunnel. During
construction of the power off take the tunnel will be out of use for an estimated period of
about 12 months. Potential impact of insufficient release of irrigation water, especially
during the critical period of May- June could be shortages of irrigation water in
agriculture further downstream with reduced crop yields and risk of soil salinity and other
problems.
Two closures of each three months will be needed during construction of the raised
intakes for respectively Tunnel 4 and Tunnel 3. During most of the construction time of
these inlets the lower intake can be used, provided that there are no ongoing construction
works at the outlet site of the tunnel. Once the raised inlets are completed both tunnels
will be taken out of use in order to connect the shaft of the inlet to the tunnel. For each
inlet there will be a closure needed of three months. But this will happen in two
consecutive years. First the connection of the inlet of Tunnel 4 will be made and in the
next winter the new inlet of Tunnel 3 will be connected. After connection it is possible to
operate both inlets (the low and the raised) independently, depending of the level of the
reservoir.
Mitigation
It is expected that with proper management during the closure period the irrigation
releases from tunnel 4 entirely could be taken over by the other Tunnels 1, 2, 3, and 5.
This can be done by increasing the operating hours from these tunnels as required. From
historic discharge data over the period 2000- 2010 it appeared that Tunnel 4 is used only
for limited periods (5-80 hours/month) in the period May July. Tunnel 5 operates only
WAPDA
August 2011
8-13
during part of the months and has sufficient extra capacity to releases more water for
irrigation. The same might be concluded for the other tunnels. This also can be shown by
comparing the maximum release capacity of the Tunnels 1, 2, 3 and 5 which is together
over 4900 m/s against a peak demand for irrigation which lies between 3000- 4000 m/s
in the months of June- July. Then, with a fully filled reservoir also water is spilled from
the spillway, which becomes available for irrigation.
The closure of the tunnel 3 and 4 during construction of the raised intakes could be
carried out in a period when the demand for irrigation water is low, which is during
winter. In this way the impact on irrigation releases will be minimal. The conclusion is
that all three closures will have no effect on the overall irrigation releases of the Tarbela
Reservoir. There will be no difference in water availability for agriculture.
Runoff from crushed and ground rock material from drilling and blasting;
Waste water effluents and sewage water from workshops and construction workers
camps;
Accidental spillage of hazardous and toxic materials such as: batteries, explosives,
acids, paints, fuel, oil, lubricants and chemicals;
WAPDA
August 2011
8-14
Construction of coffer dams (one or two are envisaged) can potentially cause increased
water turbidity adversely affecting the aquatic life particularly fish. Contamination of the
surface water of the River would need to be avoided since this could have an impact on
fish and aquatic life, but also on water quality of a number of tubewells used for the
domestic water supply of the residential areas of the WAPDA colonies as well as by the
nearby communities of Topi and Ghazi.
Mitigation
Detailed instructions and guidelines are given in the Environmental Code of Practices
(ECP) for the Contractor (see Annex C), which will be part of the general conditions of
all the contracts for the T4HP project.
Work sites and access roads will be carefully selected so that surface runoff does not
enter the river. At construction camps sewage will be pre-treated prior to discharge by
installation of septic tanks or a pilot activated treatment plant at sewage generating
sources. A sewage collection system is also envisaged to avoid the spillage of sewage in
open areas. These will be included within the Wastewater Treatment Plan (which will be
submitted to the ESMU/WEC for their review and approval). In order to mitigate water
quality impacts in line with Pakistani and World Bank Standards, pre-treatment will be
required to maintain net biological oxygen demand (BOD) levels, nutrients (phosphates
and nitrates) and pathogens (faecal coliforms) below the standards for effluent discharges
to surface waters.
Accidental spills and leakages that may occur during construction at both ends of Tunnel
4 would be avoided by taking proper safety measures, such as the construction of bunds
around oil tanks and storages of chemicals. The contractor(s) will be required to take
appropriate measures according to the ECP 2, Fuels and Hazardous Goods Management,
ECP 3, Water Resources Management and ECP 4, Drainage Management to avoid and
contain any spillage and pollution of the water resources both upstream and downstream
of the dam. Strict monitoring of the water quality is required (ECPs are provided in
Annex C).
WAPDA
August 2011
8-15
Blasting with explosive is the most significant source of vibration as it can trigger
landslides. Use of explosives may also disturb local population as vibration may be
transplanted towards residential areas. Vibration levels during blasting are however
expected to be low and within safe limits and are not expected to cause any structural
damage to buildings.
Mitigation
Noise pollution would be restricted to day time periods and levels would be properly
monitored. Workers in drilling areas would wear suitable ear protection. Noise
monitoring at the residential colonies will be required, and if the noise levels at these
locations are beyond the acceptable limits (WB Guidelines and NEQS), appropriate
mitigation measures such as noise barriers will need to be employed. Workers will be
instructed in the proper use of equipment and all blasting activities will be properly
designed and managed. Noise reduction measures will be applied such as: enclosing the
powerhouse within a solid structure; acoustic screening of noisy equipment; and a
maintenance program for all equipment and machinery. Detailed guidelines are given in
ECP 9 for Noise and Vibration management. Mitigation measures for operational noise
impacts on workers will include standard occupational health and safety practices such as
hearing protection.
8-16
Prior to the construction the Contractor will submit Method Statements, conduct a Risk
Assessment, and prepare an Emergency Response Plan (ERP) to ensure that all existing
project infrastructures have been adequately assessed prior to any excavation activity
(ERP will need to be submitted to the Supervision Consultants/ESMU for their review
and approval). In particular, attention will be paid to the safety of the existing dam,
tunnels and powerhouse. Use of heavy machinery, blasting material and blasting
technique will be carefully considered and the methodology will contain a stability
analysis for a suitable factor of safety (FOS).
During excavations the concerned slopes will be stabilized and excavation started from
the top then gradually working down the slope. After blasting a riser, it will be stabilized
by pre-designed support systems such as shotcrete, mesh and rock bolts prior to drilling
the next riser for excavation. Where there are confinement issues, cushion blasting will
be the method applied. Extreme care will be taken in designing the blasting pattern and
blasting will be controlled so as to avoid disturbance of nearby slopes where stability is in
a critical condition.
Early warning systems will be introduced that will indicate when cracks appear and allow
any widening to be monitored. This system will not be of use in unpredictable scenarios,
such as earthquakes. The system will use numbered, glass strips positioned strategically
across key areas. These will be monitored on a weekly basis for any breakage. Should a
breakage occur, the gap will be measured and monitored for any widening that will
provide an early warning of a potential landslide. During the monsoon season there will
be extra vigilance during excessive rainfalls to identify any potential risk of rock stability
or landslide in the borrow areas.
8.5.7
8-17
8.5.8
8.5.9
With an expected influx of 2500 workers for implementation of the project there is a need
for a proper infrastructure for solid waste management and handling and treatment of
waste and sewage water. Without adequate provisions there will be a high risk of severe
soil and water pollution by organic, chemical and hazardous wastes and untreated sewage
water with serious health risks. Site offices, labor camps and barracks would be provided
with adequate infrastructure and services in order to prevent pollution by solid waste and
waste effluents. Management and disposal of all kind of wastes and waste water would
need to be well organized, also to prevent conflicts with resident population
accommodated in the nearby colonies. Also in the construction yards and workshops
management of wastes, especially from fuels and hazardous goods is crucial to minimize
impact on the environment.
Mitigation
The contractor(s) will be required to prepare Waste Management Plans, in accordance
with the ECP 1 Waste Management, ECP 2 Fuels and Hazardous Goods and ECP 15
Construction Camp Management before mobilization. There will be a Waste
Management Plan for solid and hazardous wastes and one for wastewater. The plans will
set out the designated waste disposal site(s) and associated management controls. The
Plans will be submitted to ESMU/WEC for their review and approval. Monitoring of the
plan implementation will also be carried out.
WAPDA
August 2011
8-18
WAPDA
August 2011
8-19
8.6
WAPDA
August 2011
8-20
8.6.6
The low level intakes of Tunnel 3 and 4 would be retained and operated till it becomes
too risky to operate them any longer. Continued sedimentation might cause blockage of
the tunnel gate. At this point of time in future the lower intake will be taken out of use.
The tunnel part from the low level intake will have to be plugged and for this operation
the tunnel has to be closed. When this operation is scheduled in winter there will be no
impact on irrigation releases, but possibly there will be some impact on total power
generation of the plant.
WAPDA
August 2011
8-21
General
With the existing design and the layout of the operations, based on consultations with various
stakeholders, the project is not expected to have direct social safeguard impacts, such as land
acquisition, involuntary resettlement and impacts upon indigenous people. The project will use the
existing reservoir and tunnel. All construction operations will take place within existing fenced
off WAPDA areas. There will be no additional inundation or land acquisition necessary. The
likely social impacts under the project, both positive and negative will all be related to
construction operations. Potential impacts or opportunities for enhancement of consequences of
the project can be found in the following areas:
Direct adverse social impacts are expected to be marginal given the nature and the design of the
project. Associated social enhancement measures however could increase or distribute the
benefits of the project. These measures are identified in the following sections.
WAPDA
August 2011
9-1
Table 9.1:
Impacts
Phase
Sensitivity
Magnitude
Significance Prior
to Mitigation and
Residual
Significance
Enhancement
Social Legacy
Pre-
Medium
Moderate
Moderate Adverse
Medium
Moderate
Moderate beneficial
construction
Employment generation
Construction
Negligible
Major
beneficial
Construction
Low
Medium
Moderate
Moderate
Low beneficial
Moderate adverse
Moderate
beneficial
Slight adverse
Construction
No impacts
predicted
WAPDA
August 2011
Construction
Medium
Moderate
Moderate adverse
Negligible
9-2
Phase
Sensitivity
Magnitude
Significance Prior
to Mitigation and
Residual
Significance
Enhancement
Health and Safety Plan and procedures
and Operation
Construction
Medium
Moderate
Moderate adverse
and Operation
Low adverse
Construction
Medium
Moderate
Moderate adverse
Construction
Medium
Moderate
Moderate adverse
WAPDA
August 2011
Low adverse
Negligible
9-3
9.3
9.4
WAPDA
August 2011
9-4
Mitigation
The contractors will be responsible for the hiring for the construction needs. WAPDA
has developed a set of principles and requirements for the contractors to follow during
construction. The contractors, as part of the construction operation plan, will develop an
implementation plan for hiring for construction employment, following the abovementioned principles. The plan will detail the steps of laying down employment criteria,
how employment information will be disclosed locally including job descriptions, terms
of employment conditions and benefits, how preference will be given to local population,
pre-job training arrangements, who would be responsible for implementing and
monitoring this plan, consultations with local government and WAPDA over the
implementation of this plan. This plan will be submitted to WAPDA, as part of the
construction operation plan, for review and endorsement.
Ensuring rigorous standards for occupational health and safety are in place (see
below);
Having the Contractor establish a labor grievance mechanism and documenting its
use for complaints about unfair treatment or unsafe living or working conditions
without reprisal.
Adopt a Human Resource Policy appropriate to the size and workforce which
indicates the approach for management employees (this could be part requested in
the tender process);
Produce job descriptions and provide written contracts and other information that
outline the working conditions and terms of employment, including the full range of
benefits;
Provide health insurance for employees for the duration of their contracts;
Provide insurance for accidents resulting in disabilities or death of employees for the
duration of their contracts
WAPDA
August 2011
9-5
Employ a community liaison officer (this could be full time or part of another posts
responsibilities);
Raise awareness prior to recruitment, clarifying the local hire policy and procedures,
including identification of opportunities for women to participate in employment and
training;
Report regularly on the labor force profile, including gender, and location source of
workers (for instance from Swabi and Haripur Districts, from KP, from outside the
Province);
Report regularly on labor and working condition key performance indicators, for
instance hours worked (regular and overtime) during period and cumulatively, hours
lost, number and type of accidents, near misses, site audits and meetings; trainings,
and use of labor grievance mechanism;
Hold toolbox talks on workers rights and the labor grievance mechanisms during the
construction phase;
Organize a training program and keep training registers for construction workers;
9.4.3
The influx of a large construction force may easily lead to social conflicts with the local
population. Workers also might misbehave or get involved in illegal practices, e.g.
poaching or hunting. In order to contribute to a harmonious relationship with local
communities, to reduce behaviors that could lead to social conflict, and to prevent further
environmental degradation a Code of Conduct will be developed for the labor force.
Mitigation
The Code of Conduct recognizes the provision of resources by the employer and shares
responsibilities among the workers for the use of equipment, procedures and training.
Typical issues to be included in a Code of Conduct are the following:
Careful use of local natural resources and project resources, especially water,
transmission line materials, fuel, fuel-wood and electricity;
Respect for the local community and its cultural norms in which laborers are
working.
WAPDA
August 2011
9-6
Each contractor will establish a comprehensive Health and Safety Plan aimed at
preventing accidents, injuries and work-related diseases. This plan will be submitted
to WAPDA and World Bank for review and approval;
All workers must be provided with and use appropriate personal protective
equipment (PPE). First aid must be provided and there would be procedures in place
to access appropriate emergency facilities;
Hazards require staff training. All employees need to carry out induction health and
safety training prior to commencement of work. OHS issues would be part of the
employee training plan. Training would include the provision of appropriate written
or visual materials to reinforce learning. Where illiteracy levels are high, OHS
issues need to be covered more frequently than normal in toolbox talks;
An emergency response team and plan must be identified. Training and drills based
on the accident and emergency preparedness and response plan must be carried out
quarterly with workers and local health authorities. Training requirements, including
for emergency preparedness, will need to be updated annually;
Public awareness training and workshops on safety and health risks will be
conducted for local communities prior and during construction operations.
It is essential that all personnel likely to be involved in the Project at the construction site
undergo a basic training program prior to performing assigned work.
WAPDA
August 2011
9-7
Safety Plan
Contractors will prepare safety plan as part of their operational plan. The safety plan will
include at least the following:
Familiarization with the fire protection system and emergency response plan (basic
fire fighting training);
9.4.5
The Project construction activities to be carried out near the local communities may cause
disturbance and possible conflicts between the work force and the local population.
Due to increased use of trucks and other vehicles on the narrow roads in the project
area on the access roads to the urban areas elderly people, women and children will
be more exposed to dangerous situations, which may lead to traffic accidents and
unrest;
There might be noise and dust pollution due to blasting, use of heavy machinery and
intensive traffic;
The influx and accommodation of a relatively large work force will result in
increased concerns for the safety of women and children. The mobility of women
might be reduced;
Workers coming from different parts of Pakistan may have different norms and
values in social behavior as compared with the resident population. In addition,
migrant labor force could disturb the privacy of the local population.
Miscommunications between these two groups could easily lead to social unrest.
There could be shortage of supplies in local markets and shops due to the temporary
presence of a large workforce. This could be a hindrance for the local population,
especially for elderly people.
People particularly women and children in the Right Bank Colony will be most affected
and it is a tiny community. They will have limited access to alternative routes unless
WAPDA
August 2011
9-8
provided by the Project. Hence, the impact of the Project on womens mobility is
considered to be an adverse impact.
Mitigation
The Contractor will be required to develop a Traffic Management Plan. It will need to be
developed in consultation with local leaders/elders of the community and include
reference to mobility and access through the construction area in such a way that all
females feel comfortable. Special consideration would be taken to avoid routes used by
women and, if unavoidable, alternate routes would be identified for women.
Blasting is another disturbance which may require attention. Effects may be seasonal and
weather dependent. Nonetheless, the Contractor will need to have a monitoring system in
place and as necessary procedures may be required to limit the time frame and frequency
of blasting to minimize negative effects on community members and their livestock.
Shortage of supplies could be mitigated by requesting Contractor to procure their
supplies in a manner not significantly affecting the availability of essential commodities
in the area for residents.
A Project grievance mechanism will be established. The Contractor will be required to
appoint someone to have community liaison officer (CLO) responsibilities to be a point
of contact for stakeholders. The CLO will be responsible for logging complaints and
comments and ensuring their timely investigation and response.
9.5
Updating the registration process so that villagers in Khabbal, Ghari Mera and Kukar
Chawa have security passes to facilitate easier access to their homes;
Constructing three basic health units to improve the access of local people to
dispensaries in the villages of Darra Mohat, Ghari Mera and Pontian;
Assigning WAPDA male and female medical officers already working in the
WAPDA hospital to visit bi- weekly the nearby hamlets of Ghazi and Pehur where
dispensaries already exist;
WAPDA
August 2011
9-9
Supporting existing schools with furniture, one boys high school at Pehur Hamlet
and other at Girls school at Pehur Hamlet;
Providing sewage schemes for the villages Ghazi Hamlet, Topi area and Pehur
Hamlet;
Rehabilitation of a drainage system in the existing Drain near Topi and Pehur
Hamlet;
Addressing womens concerns including: (i) supply of equipment and teaching staff
in industrial school (already exists at Right Bank Colony); (ii) recruitment of a
gynecologist at Pehur and Ghazi Hamlets; (iii) upgrading of middle school to
secondary level at Pehur Hamlet; (iv) provision of computer equipment for computer
classes; (v) welfare bazaar in schools; (vi) sewing machines; (vii) cooking classes
and English language classes in the evening.
9-10
10
Diamer-Basha, Kalabagh, Akhori dams on the Indus, Munda dam on the Swat river- a tributary of the
Kabul river, and Kurram Tangi dam, on the Kurram river. Pakistan has been trying to build a dam on
the Indus River at Kalabagh (downstream from Tarbela) for quite some time: studies have been
conducted since 1953 and in 1986 the designs were completed.
WAPDA
August 2011
10-1
The construction of Kalabagh Dam, located downstream of Tarbela could not proceed
due to interprovincial water allocation issues, construction could not proceed. At this
stage, Pakistan is focusing on the dams upstream of Tarbela, such as Diamer-Basha. It is
also working on some run of the river hydropower plants upstream of Tarbela such as
Dasu Hydropower Project. The dams upstream would have positive impact on Tarbela as
the upstream dams would trap the sediments thus extending the life of Tarbela Reservoir.
The estimates are that Basha would hold 35 years of sediment in its dead and live storage
before it starts to pass down towards Tarbela. Thus it would extend the life of Tarbela
Project by 35 years, as well as of the Ghazi-Brotha Power plant which relies on water
supplies from Tarbela Dam. Given the construction period for the Diamer-Basha Dam,
and that it has not started yet, the dam with a live storage capacity of 7,894 Mm3 (6.4
MAF) would barely make up for lost reservoir capacity. Thus the increasing average
annual canal water diversions back to 129,516 Mm3 (105 MAF) in the future is unlikely.
10-2
and flood water; improvement of wetlands in the delta area and in the coastal zone;
recognizing their environmental importance and considerable economic potential for
local communities. These four phased studies are to be carried out in consultation with
the stakeholders starting from the beginning to the end of the process covering the
identification of the issues, and an analysis and design of solutions.
10-3
The project would have no impact on the water releases from Tarbela Dam. As indicated
earlier, the Dam would be operated in irrigation priority under overall instructions of
Indus River System Authority (IRSA). The water which is currently spilled through the
spillway (loses its energy in the structures downstream)5 would be diverted to the Tunnel
4 where it would pass through the three 470 MW turbines and generate electricity which
would be transmitted to the unified common grid. The energy of this water, which is
otherwise wasted in the spillway structure, would now be used for generating clean
electricity (about 4,000 GWhs) without any greenhouse emissions for pollution. So the
project helps make better use of the waters of the Indus Rivers. Any thermal plant, coal,
oil or gas if installed instead of this plant would generate substantial greenhouse gases
and pollution. If upstream dams materialize, the life of the Tarbela would be extended
even more. Downstream, the future is making water use more efficient and timely
delivery of water to maximize crop production. The Tarbela would continue to perform
that role in future by storing water and releasing when it is needed.
Water released from spillway or though power house has same amount of energy. In case of
spillways the structures are designed downstream to dissipate the energy of the water so that it does
not scour the river bed and damage the river and the dam infrastructures. In case of powerhouse
installed on a tunnels the energy is converted to electricity for much better use instead of just
dissipating it unproductively.
WAPDA
August 2011
10-4
11
11.1 Introduction
This chapter sets out the Environmental and Social Management Plan (ESMP) for the
Project. The ESMP has been prepared to ensure the implementation and monitoring of
the proposed mitigation measures set out in Chapters 8 and 9.
A separate document, the SIMF, has been produced to perform the same function
specifically for the social issues set out in Chapter 9.
Facilitate the implementation of the mitigation measures identified during the present
ESA and discussed in Chapters 8 and 9.
The ESMP will be managed through a number of tasks and activities and site specific
management plans. One purpose of the ESMP is to record the procedure and
methodology for management of mitigation identified for each negative impacts of the
Project. The management will clearly delineate the responsibility of various participants
and stakeholders involved in planning, implementation and operation of the Project.
11.3.1
In order to make contractors fully aware and responsible of the implications of the ESMP
and to ensure its compliance, it will be ensured that environmental measures are treated
appropriately and separately in the tender documentation and that payment milestones are
linked to environmental performance, measured by execution of the prescribed
WAPDA
August 2011
11-1
WAPDA
August 2011
11-2
Ensure that all contractors follow the PEPA regulations and other requirements
mentioned in the construction contracts concerning dust suppression, solid waste
disposal, municipal wastewater disposal, air pollution, noise and vibration,
biodiversity, transport, storage and use of flammable and explosive materials;
Interaction with the stakeholders for their concerns about the construction activities;
and
The ESMU will ultimately be responsible to the WAPDA Environment Cell (WEC),
taking a leadership role in the ESMU, with a senior WEC representative taking
responsibility for the ESMU overall. It is important to have representation from
stakeholders involved in delivering the Project, including those with contractual
responsibilities.
The proposed composition of the ESMU is as follows:
Since its creation, WEC has carried out scores of IEE, EIA, Environmental Management
Plan (EMP) and assessment of social and environment management of WAPDA Projects.
In addition, WEC was responsible for decade long monitoring of environmental and
social issues of GBHPP, including environmental water flow assessment and evaluation
of various reports.
WAPDA
August 2011
11-3
The charter of WEC was chalked in its infancy to go ahead with the environmental
studies of various project vis--vis:
WAPDA
August 2011
11-4
Table 11.1:
General
environmental
Participants
and
Design team;
Responsibility
ESMU
Schedule
Prior to the start of the
socioeconomic awareness;
Selected WAPDA
project activities.
management staff
(To
be
repeated
as
needed.)
environmental
and
ESMU
socioeconomic awareness;
field activities.
(To
needed.)
be
repeated
as
Mitigation measures;
Community issues;
Awareness of transmissible diseases
Social and cultural values.
ESMP;
Construction crew
Contractor (ESS)
Waste disposal
(To
be
repeated
as
needed.)
Road safety;
Drivers
Contractor (ESS)
Defensive driving;
field operations.
Waste disposal;
(To
needed.)
Camp operation;
Camp staff
Contractor (ESS)
be
repeated
Waste disposal;
field operations.
(To
Housekeeping.
needed.)
Restoration requirements;
Restoration teams
Waste disposal
Contractor (ESS)
as
be
repeated
as
11-5
11.6 Communication
A Communication and Information Plan will be developed by WAPDA which will be
based on the development of a communication strategy for different target groups (local
communities, previously affected persons, local and provincial authorities, general public
and press). During the project regular briefings of progress will be organized for public
information and for the media. The Communication and Information Centre will also
have a section where complaints and grievances can be registered and addressed. A
Communication and Information Specialist will be appointed for the project. WAPDA is
engaging consultant experts to develop the Communication and Information Plan. This
plan is expected to be completed by end 2011
For the environmental and social management of the project, WAPDA will establish and
maintain procedures for the following levels of communication:
Internal communication between the various levels and functions of the organization
and between WAPDA, WEC and ESMU (ESMU to be responsible for
communication with consultants and contractors relating to environmental issues);
WAPDA
August 2011
11-6
The impacts and mitigations identified for the decommissioning phase are considered to
be sufficiently similar to the construction phase to conclude that a separate ESMP for the
Decommissioning Phase is not required at this stage.
Procedures and processes for the above would be set up prior to construction and
operation of the Project. Should any changes to the Project design or methods of
construction and operation take place post this assessment stage, the impacts and
monitoring/mitigation measures discussed may need to be revised to reflect such changes
to allow the environmental and social implications of these changes to be addressed.
WAPDA
August 2011
11-7
Table 11.2:
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
Design / preconstruction
considerations
WAPDA
August 2011
1.1
Slope Instability
1.2
Geology and
seismology
1.3
Disposal of excavated
material
1.4
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
Design
Consultants,
ESMU
All excavated
materials to be
disposed of in
designated sites.
Before construction:
during detailed
designing of the
Project.
Design
Consultants,
ESMU
Emergency
Preparedness Plan
in place prior to
commencement of
construction.
Before construction
Design
Consultants,
ESMU
All excavated
materials to be
disposed of in
designated sites.
Compliance with
Waste Management
Plans.
Before construction
Design
Consultants
ESMU
None proposed.
Before construction
11-8
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
WAPDA
August 2011
1.5
Groundwater Quality
1.6
Traffic Management
1.7
Construction camp
(and other temporary
facilities) site selection
1.8
Construction camp
management
1.9
Waste management
1.10
Excavated material
management
1.11
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
Design
Consultants
ESMU
Monitoring in
accordance with
Ground Water
Monitoring Program.
No breaches of
MDSD for
hazardous
substances.
Before construction
Contractor
ESMU
Approved TMP
Contractor
ESMU
Approval from
ESMU/ESM
Before mobilization
of contractor
commences
Before mobilization
of contractor
Contractor
ESMU
Approved Plan
Before mobilization
of contractor
Contractor
ESMU
Approved Plan
Before mobilization
of contractor
Contractor
ESMU
Approved Plan
Before commencing
the construction
activities.
Contractor
ESMU
Approved Plan
Before mobilization
of contractor
11-9
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
Contractor
Mobilization and
Demobilization
WAPDA
August 2011
1.12
Water resource
management
1.13
2.1
Traffic management
2.2
2.3
Air Quality
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
Contractor
ESMU
Approved Plan
Before mobilization
of contractor
Contractor
ESMU
Approved Plan
Before mobilization
of contractor
Contractor
ESM;
ESMU
During mobilization
Contractor
ESMU
Throughout
contractor
mobilization and
demobilization
Contractor
ESMU
Throughout
contractor
mobilization and
demobilization
11-10
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
WAPDA
August 2011
2.4
Noise
2.5
Public Safety
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
Contractor
ESMU
Throughout
contractor
mobilization and
demobilization
Contractor
ESMU
Throughout
contractor
mobilization and
demobilization
11-11
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
Construction
workers camp:
Construction
and Operation
WAPDA
August 2011
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
2.6
Damage to
Infrastructure
Contractor
ESMU
3.1
Contractor
ESMU
Throughout
contractor
mobilization and
demobilization
Before and
throughout the
construction phase
11-12
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
WAPDA
August 2011
3.2
Air Quality
3.3
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
Contractor
ESMU
Throughout the
construction phase
Contractor
ESMU
Before and
throughout the
construction phase
11-13
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
Transportation
of Equipment
and
WAPDA
August 2011
3.4
Noise
3.5
3.6
Public Safety
3.7
4.1
Traffic management
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
Contractor
ESMU
Throughout the
construction phase
Contractor
ESMU
Before and
throughout the
construction phase
Contractor
ESMU
Before and
throughout the
construction phase
Contractor
ESMU
Throughout the
construction phase
Contractor
ESMU
Throughout the
construction phase
11-14
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
Construction
Material
4.3
4.4
Noise
4.5
Public Safety
4.6
Damaged to
Infrastructure
Changes to
topography
4.2
Construction of
Powerhouse,
Penstock Route
and Intake Area
5.1
5.2
WAPDA
August 2011
Landslide
Contractor
ESMU
Contractor
ESMU
Contractor
ESMU
Contractor
ESMU
Contractors
ESMU
Contractor
ESMU
Contractor,
ESMU
Before construction
Number of blasting
events.
Method Statements
and Risk
Assessments
produced for
construction of each
item of
infrastructure.
All excavated
materials to be
disposed of in
designated sites.
Monitoring of early
warning systems.
Throughout the
construction phase
Before construction
Before construction
Before construction
Throughout the
construction phase
11-15
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
5.3
WAPDA
August 2011
Soil erosion
Contractor
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
ESMU
Incidences of borrow
pits not being
covered.
Compliance with the
Tree Plantation
Plan.
All replanting to be
commenced prior to
operation.
Throughout the
construction phase
and prior to
operation
11-16
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
WAPDA
August 2011
5.4
5.5
Air Quality
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
Contractor
ESMU
Monthly auditing of
management of
hazardous materials
against Material
Safety Data Sheet
Throughout the
construction phase
Contractor
ESMU
Throughout
construction phase
11-17
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
WAPDA
August 2011
5.6
5.7
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
Contractor
ESMU
Number of
respiratory
protective devices
issues to workers.
Monitoring of
compliance with
Health & Safety
standards (including
monthly reporting of
accidents).
Throughout
construction phase
Contractor
ESMU
Number of blasting
events recorded.
Evidence of
providing advance
warning of blasting
to communities.
Record of
equipment used on
site capable of
producing over 85dB
and whether
equipment has been
Throughout
construction phase
11-18
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
WAPDA
August 2011
5.8
Irrigation Releases
5.9
Power Generation
5.10
5.11
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
fitted with mufflers
Duration of works
demonstrated to be
kept to minimum
and demonstrated
efforts to undertake
work during dates of
annual closure.
Irrigation releases to
remain consistent
during period of
tunnel joining
ESMU;
Contractor
ESMU
Joining of new
tunnel to existing
Tunnel 4
ESMU;
Contractor
ESMU
Contractor
ESMU
Monitoring in
accordance with
Surface Water
Monitoring Program.
No breaches of
MDSD for
hazardous
substances.
Throughout
construction phase
Contractor
ESMU
Compliance with
Tree Plantation Plan
Before the
completion of the
construction phase
Throughout
construction phase
11-19
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
WAPDA
August 2011
5.12
Vegetation loss
5.13
Fauna / Wildlife
5.14
Damage to
infrastructure
5.15
Plan
New planting and landscape
restoration as soon as
practicable at the end of
construction phase
Replanting of flora/vegetation
alongside new access roads
Enhance flora environment by
planting fruit trees and
ornamental shrubs.
Avoid dumping material in
vegetated areas.
Avoid unnecessary loss of
vegetation
ECP-10 will be implemented.
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
Contractor
ESMU
None proposed.
Throughout
construction phase
Contractor
ESMU
Throughout
construction phase
Contractor
Instances of spoil
being deposited in
non-designated
areas.
Reported incidences
of hunting or
poaching on the
Project site / in land
ownership.
Lack of any noncompliance reports
Contractor
11-20
Project
Activities
Environmental
Impact/Issue
Action
Responsibility
Execution
Decommissioning
WAPDA
August 2011
6.1
Soil erosion
6.2
Key Performance
Indicator
Timing
Monitoring
Contractor
ESMU
Contractor
ESMU
During
decommissioning
Upon completion of
decommissioning
11-21
Table 11.3:
Project
Action
Responsibility
Indicator
Execution
Pre-operation
Timing
Key Performance
Activities
1.1
Visual amenity
ESMU,
Contractor
Monitoring
ESMU
Plantation Plan
of the construction
Compliance with
phase
Landscape Plan
2
Operation
2.1
activities
Operation and
3.1
TDP O&M
staff
by around 5%.
joining
Waste
TDP O&M
Maintenance
staff
Activities
WEC
Irrigation Releases-
Irrigation releases to
During operation
remain consistent
WEC
Compliance with
During operation
Waste Management
Plan
WEC
TDP O&M
Monitoring of
to Occupational
staff
Workers
compliance with
Health & Safety
maintenance activities
Management Framework)
standards (including
monthly reporting of
accidents).
WAPDA
August 2011
11-22
Verify that the activities are undertaken in compliance with the ESA and ESMP.
Maintain contact with the communities, solicit their views and concerns, and discuss
them during the fortnightly meetings.
The mitigation plan discussed above will be used as a management and monitoring tool
for compliance monitoring. Inspections will be carried out using checklists prepared by
the contractor, on the basis of the Table 11.2, during the construction phase, and by the
O&M staff on the basis of Table 11.3 during the O&M phase.
To verify that the impacts of the proposed project are within acceptable limits, thus
establishing credibility (public assurance);
To provide information to plan and control the timing, location, and level of certain
project activities so that the effects are minimized; and
WAPDA
August 2011
11-23
The effects monitoring plan is provided in Table 11.4 below. The detailed
methodologies will be developed during the detailed design phase of the Project when the
specific information on field activities will be known. The effects monitoring will
comprise the following:
Soil erosion;
Landslide;
Water quality;
Oil spills;
Waste;
Air quality;
Noise;
Grievance monitoring.
ESMU may revise the effects monitoring plan during the project implementation as
required.
WAPDA
August 2011
11-24
Table 11.4:
No
Monitoring parameter
Monitoring Locations
Frequency
Responsibility
Methodology/
Documentation
Resource Requirement
1
Soil erosion
ESMU
Record
of
visual
camera
observation/photographs
Complete record
disposal sites
2
Landslide
Construction sites
Weekly
ESMU
positioned
strategically
Weekly
ESMU
sites
3
Water quality
At
wells
water
and
surface
bodies
WAPDA
Before mobilization
ESMU
near
colonies
Visual
observations,
Record
of
visual
digital camera
observation/photographs
Laboratory
analysis/sampling bottles
analysis
Sampling bottles
and
labor campsite
Selected local wells
Monthly
ESMU
analysis
Selected
nearby
locations
surface
at
Monthly
ESMU
Sampling bottles
water
bodies
4
Damage to groundwater
Construction site
ESMU
wells, watercourse
5
Oil spill
Construction
workshops
site
and
ESMU
oil
Visual
observations,
Solid waste
of
visual
observation/photographs
Visual
Record
observations,
digital camera
storage areas
6
Record
digital camera
of
visual
observations/
photographs
ESMU
campsite
Visual
observations,
digital camera
Record
of
visual
observations/
photographs
Wastewater
Labor campsite
ESMU
Sampling bottles
WAPDA
August 2011
11-25
Monitoring parameter
Monitoring Locations
Frequency
Responsibility
Documentation
Methodology/
Resource Requirement
Before mobilization
ESMU
campsite
Construction site, labor
ESMU
campsite
9
Exhaust emissions
ESMU
site
Ambient
air
quality
monitoring equipment
analysis
Ambient
air
quality
monitoring equipment
analysis
Visual
Record
observations,
digital camera
of
visual
observations/
photographs
10
Dust emissions
ESMU
Visual
observations,
digital camera
Record
of
visual
observations/
photographs
11
Noise
Nearby communities
Fortnightly
or
construction
during
ESMU
Noise meter
activities
measurement
causing noise
12
Public grievance
Nearby communities
Throughout
work
WAPDA
August 2011
construction
location
ESMU
Complaints register
11-26
These audits would be used to re-examine the continued appropriateness of the ESMP
and to provide advice on any up-dates required. Attention would be given to lessons
learnt in the light of experience. In particular, consideration would be given to the
monitoring programs in place to determine whether their purpose has been served and
they can therefore be terminated or reduced in frequency
11.8.1
Monitoring Records
WAPDA
August 2011
11-27
A database would be developed by ESMU, with involvement from WEC for storing the
results of the quantitative monitoring. The facility would be capable of producing
tabulated weekly and monthly reports that provide the following information:
Sampling points;
Test results;
Control limits;
Action limits (circa 80% of the control limits) at which steps must be taken to
prevent the impending breach of the control limit; and
A Site Inspection Checklist for recording the findings of the general site condition
surveys would be developed by the respective contractors, on the basis of the
Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan described in Section 10.3, during the
construction phase. This would cover all the ESMP commitments as provided in Section
10.4. The Site Inspection Checklist would be supported by sketches, as necessary.
Brief description of the complaint, with a file reference to any correspondence from
the complainant;
Brief description of the action taken by the Plant Management to investigate the
cause of the complaint and bring about corrective action, if justified; and
All complaints received by the Plant Management would be handled in this way
WAPDA
August 2011
11-28
Current calibration certificates for all the equipment that requires calibration by an
external organization; and
Findings of the monitoring programs, with emphasis on any breaches of the control
standards, action levels or standards of general site management;
Outstanding NCRs;
Summary of any complaints by external bodies and actions taken / to be taken; and
Presence of a construction labor force and the effects on neighboring villages, local
services and infrastructure.
WAPDA
August 2011
11-29
Failure of WAPDA, its Contractors and their workers or drivers to comply with
standards or legal obligations;
Criminal activity;
Validity
Response
None or low
Unsubstantiated
Classificatio
n
Low
Possible substantiation
Probable risk
and could reoccur
Probable substantiation
WAPDA
August 2011
11-30
The CO will log the receipt of a comment, formally acknowledge it, track progress on its
investigation and resolution, and respond in writing with feedback to the aggrieved party.
A response time of 10 working days, unless there are exceptional circumstances, would
be the aim.
The CO will identify an appropriate investigation team with the correct skills to review
the issue raised and to decide whether it is Project related or whether it is more
appropriately addressed by a relevant authority outside the Project. WAPDA will play a
role in investigating the validity and responsibility for some grievances. Project staff,
and outside authorities as appropriate, will also contribute to investigations as required.
The investigation will aim to identify whether the incident leading to the grievance is a
singular occurrence or likely to reoccur. Identifying and implementing activities,
procedures, equipment and training to address and prevent reoccurrence will be part of
the investigation activities. In some cases it will be appropriate for the CO to follow up
at a later date to see if the person or organization is satisfied with the resolution or
remedial actions.
The CO will explain in writing (or where literacy is an issue, orally) the manner in which
the review was carried out, the results of the review, any changes to activities that will be
undertaken to address the grievance or how the issue is being managed to meet
appropriate environmental and social management systems and requirements.
The CO will summarize grievances in project performance reports, at least bi-annually
during construction and annually during operation.
The Project will aim to protect a persons confidentiality when requested and will
guarantee anonymity in annual reporting. Individuals will be asked permission to
disclose their identity. Investigations will be undertaken in a manner that is respectful of
the aggrieved party and the principle of confidentiality. The aggrieved party will need to
recognize that there may be situations when disclosure of identity is required and the
Project will identify these situations to see whether the aggrieved party wishes to
continue with the investigation and resolution activities.
Recommended Action
WAPDA
August 2011
11-31
Suggestions/Comments
Recommended Action
Same as above.
WAPDA
August 2011
11-32
Suggestions/Comments
Recommended Action
Section 9.5.1).
Same as above.
Same as above
WAPDA
August 2011
11-33
Suggestions/Comments
Recommended Action
included in ESA to give preference to local
population (see Section 9.4).
Same as above.
Same as above.
WAPDA
August 2011
Same as above.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Same as above.
11-34
Suggestions/Comments
Recommended Action
Same as above.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Same as above.
Cost
Cost
Million PKR
Million US$
Project
Component
0.29
C2
24.65
*)
*)
*)
*)
*)
*)
50.15
0.59
C2
83.30
0.98
C2
10
Strengthening of WEC
90.00
1.06
11
24.00
0.28
E2
*)
13
*)
14
0.39
C2
15
*)
WAPDA
August 2011
33.15
11-35
Description
Cost
Cost
Million PKR
Million US$
Project
Component
24.65
0.29
C1
16
17
1062.50
12.50
C1
18
104.4
1.23
C1
1,496.80
17.61
*) in contractors budget
WAPDA
August 2011
11-36
Annex A:
Consultation Details
Headmistress
Jamila Hassan
School Teacher
Afra Bashra
School Teacher
Ms. Munaza
School Teacher
Summera Iqbal
School Teacher
Wakeela Naz
School Teacher
Kaneez Akhtar
Resident
Alia Zafar
Resident
Salma Shehnaz
Resident
Nobia Naveed
Resident
Summera Ammar
Resident
Zeenat bibi
Resident
Ghazala Naveed
Resident
Shazia
Resident
Shagufta Saeed
Resident
Mrs. Naveed
Resident
Ms. Zahida
Resident
Tayyaba Khan
Resident
Aqeeda Nasreen
Resident
Sadaf Naeem
Resident
Beghum Iqbal
Resident
WAPDA
August 2011
A-1
Shereen Taj
Resident
Sarwat Khan
Resident
Ayesha Hina
Resident
Nazia Gul
Resident
WAPDA
August 2011
A-2
Designation
Contact No.
S. Bashir Ahmad
R.E (E)
0342-9184105
Khurshid Khan
OE
0303-5120265
Asif Jan
OE
0334-9304782
Muhammad Farooq
Sr. Engineer
0334-8697544
Abdul Rahim
????
0321-9876393
Ghous Nawaz
PEIE-II
0332-5056159
SSE
0346-9070696
Iftikhar Ahmad
Sub Engineer
0305-5727502
10
Shoiab Saleem
ASA
0300-5311157
11
Zohaib Hashim
Junior Engineer
0344-9019514
12
Usman Jamil
Junior Engineer
0344-9019514
13
Munir Ahmad
Junior Engineer
0345-5445661
14
Asif Saeed
Junior Engineer
0321-2059427
15
Mazhar Nouman
Lab Assistant
0345-9373301
16
Abdul Majid
Test Inspector
0345-6520280
17
Shamsuddin
Assistant Foreman
0333-7369246
18
Ihsan Ullah
0344-9212080
19
Ashfaq Ahmad
JP&IE -II
0333-5324581
20
Imtiaz Ahmad
Junior Engineer
0313-9095171
21
Habib-ur-Rehman
Senior Engineer
0306-5510413
22
M. Zafar Khan
Resident Engineer
0312-5033481
23
Javed Akhtar
Senior Engineer
0300-5829739
24
Amin Ullah
JIE
0306-7058881
25
Khalid Khan
0346-8999760
26
0344-2829678
27
Khurshid Anwar
Project Director
0321-9897172
28
RE (M)
29
Hameed Ullah
EME (P)-I
WAPDA
August 2011
A-3
Table A.10:
Participants
Village/Settlement
1
Pehur Hamlet
(November
2010)
Person Contacted
Muhammad Javed
24,
Bakhat Gul
Jahangeer
Muhammad Waqas
Ijaz Ahmed
Usman Sher
Muddsar Iqbal
Paris Khan
Muhammad Rafique
10
Ghulam Qadir
11
Bahadar Sher
12
Allah Baksh
13
Siddique Ahmed
14
Fida Muhammad
Ghazi Hamlet
(November
2010
25,
0300-5688606
0300-5394800
Abdul Rasheed
Muhammad Din
Ghazanfar Shah
Shabir Ahmed
Javed Iqbal
Aqil Shah
10
Muhammad Maskeen
WAPDA
August 2011
0300-8585695
Contact Number
03015037032
0300-5258117
A-4
Table A.11:
Consultation
01
Location
Officials Contacted
02
03
04
05
Cell 0312-9064002
Dispensary ,WAPDA
Centre/Dy.Director Admin
Cell. 0301-8883014
Mr. Khalid Saeed, Care Taker
Cell. 0301-8345117
07
O8
(KP)
0346-7868651
Mr. Haydait Shah, Assistant Director
Cell 0300-5996510
09
10
(KP)
Cell. 0321-4868140
Mr. Abdul Rasheed Tanooli, Deputy Range Officer. Cell.
0346-9595078
11
12
WAPDA
August 2011
A-5
Officials Contacted
Cell. 0300-5958563
13
14
15
Colony
16
Colony
Cell. 0314-9898725
Mr. Habib Ullah, Teacher
17
18
19
20
21
22
WAPDA
August 2011
A-6
Village / Settlement
Person Contacted
Contact Number
01
0300-5394800
02
03
Ghaznfer Shah
04
Shabir Ahmed
05
Javed Iqbal
06
Aqil Shah
07
Alf Din
08
Liaqat Ali
09
Ghazi Hamlet
12
Muhammad Maskeen
13
Azhar Ali
14
Saeed Shah
15
16
17
Abdul Rasheed
18
Muhammad Din
19
Muhammad Javed
20
Ghulam Qadir
21
Bahadar Sher
22
Taus Khan
23
Usman Sher
24
Allah Baksh
25
Siddique Ahmed
26
Sher Khan
Pehur Hamlet
0300-5258117
10
27
0301-5037032
0300-8585695
0300-5688606
Muddsar Iqbal
28
Paris Khan
29
Muhammad Rafique
30
Bakhat Gul
31
Jahangeer
32
Muhammad Waqas
33
Ijaz Ahmed
34
35
WAPDA
August 2011
A-7
Person Contacted
Contact Number
36
Muhammad Javed
0300-9082446
37
Khan Muhammad
38
Allah Baksh
39
Siddique Ahmed
40
Fazal e waliat
41
Kafiat ur Rehman
Boys High School Pehur Hamlet
42
Muntzar Khan
43
Fida Muhammad
44
Muhammad Javed
45
Usman Sher
46
Muhammad Shahzad
47
Iftekhar Ahmed
0344-9215199
48
Khalid Ghafoor
0313-9412721
49
Tanveer Alam
0345-9495220
50
Muhammad Ayub
51
Abdul Hameed
52
Saleem Bahadar
03005523695
0300-9086466
Ayub Jan
54
0300-5689998
55
Yasir Mahmood
0314-9995565
56
Muhammad Abdullah
57
Abdul Haq
58
Anwer Ahmed
033-9136976
59
Gohar Ali
0314-9898725
60
Javed Iqbal
0302-5685033
61
Habib Ullah
0346-5611386
Muhammad Asghar
0300-4875325
Ayaz Awan
034609804212
64
Ali Badsh
0301-5751645
65
Fakher e Alam
0300-9358165
66
Zia ul Haq
0303-5353235
67
Wisal Shah
0345-9491145
68
Waqar Hussan
0302-5470599
69
Umer Khaliq
0300-9712004
Nasar Iqbal
0300-9787113
62
63
70
Darra Mohat
71
WAPDA
August 2011
Abdul Sattar
A-8
Person Contacted
Contact Number
72
Sultan Afzal
73
Bashir Khan
74
Jameel Rehman
75
Nazir Hussain
76
Farman Shah
77
Meraj Khan
78
Mohsin Shah
79
Shakir Nawaz
0303-5290611
80
Ashiq Hussain
0302-5306419
81
Khalid Zaman
0332-5727140
82
Sarzameen Khan
83
Rabaz Khan
84
Muhammad Sajjad
0308-8079313
0308-8582757
Kukar Chawa
85
Muslim Khan
86
Rizwan Khan
87
Jalil Rehman
88
Mir Haider
89
Asad Ghani
90
Shahras Khan
91
92
Aizaz Afzal
93
Muhammad Ajmal
94
Ahmed Nawaz
95
0308-8569281
0306-8168237
0300-5809632
Naeem Khan
Ghari Mera
96
Roshin Din
97
Muqdar Khan
98
Faisal Nawaz
99
Faisal Qadeer
100
Muhammad Naiz
101
102
Muhammad Shahzad
0300-5813331
103
Muhammad Adnan
0313-5882582
Umer Khaliq
0300-9712004
104
Sobra City
105
Muhammad Sohail
106
Akhtar Javed
107
Aziz Ullah
WAPDA
August 2011
0301-5751158
0301-8343290
A-9
Person Contacted
Contact Number
108
Fazal-e-Subhan
109
Kareem Khan
0345-2994731
110
0343-5257933
111
Bashir ahmed
0300-8306243
112
Muhammad Ilyas
0347-9342694
113
Dr.Ameer Khan
0300-5907301
0300-9139466
115
Nayyar Iqbal
0346-5628747
116
Arsalan Ajmal
0313-5911838
117
Dilfraz Khan
0301-8765881
118
Rab Nawaz
0307-5338729
119
Orengzeb Khan
120
Jalat Khan
121
Tamraz Khan
122
Mukhtar Khan
114
Qazi Pur
123
Khabbal
Bukhtair Khan
124
Ejaz Khan
125
Yasin Khan
126
Khawas Khan
127
Taufail Khan
128
Ikram Ullah
129
Said Akbar
130
Abdul Qadoos
131
Taufail Ahmed
132
Javed Ahmed
0344-4141158
0342-9686533
0300-9343294
0314-9769529
Pontian
133
Waheed Khan
134
Gul Bahadar
135
Yasir Khan
136
Muhammad Idrees
137
Sabaz Ali
WAPDA
August 2011
A-10
Designation
Department/ Village
1.
Javed Iqbal
PRO (Protocol)
WPADA, Tarbela
2.
Fazli Amin
SE (S & E)
WAPDA, Tarbela
3.
Malik Fazl-i-Karim
G. STPC
Press
4.
Ammad Ali
Affectee
Khalo
5.
Naila Taseen
Sangi Foundation
6.
Syed Kazim
Dir. Seismology
WAPDA Tarbela
7.
Naseer Iqbal
Ex- Nazim
Umerkhana
8.
Amjad Ali
President
committee
9.
Muhammad Shahbaz
President
10
Nasir Mohmmud
Inspector
TDP
11.
Israr Khan
SE (D& S)
WAPDA, TDP
12.
Amin Khan
ASE (D&S)
WAPDA, TDP
13.
Umaer Khaliq
Principal QPS
Ghazi
14.
Assad
Affectee
Dull Dara
15.
Shakir Nawaz
Affectee
16.
Abul Kalam
Sr. Engineer
Tarbell 4th HP
17.
Waqas Ahmad
Affectee
Khalo
18.
Bashir Ahmad
Affectee
Village Qazipur
19.
Sajjad Haidar
TMO Ghazi
20.
Zahoor Ahmad
Teacher
21.
Chairman UCC
Mian Dhari
22.
Kamran
Affectee
Village Khbal
23.
Qasim Shah
Affectee
Ummer Khano
24.
Torab Khan
Affectee
Khano
25.
Sardar Shehzad
Affectee
Sobra City
26.
Shabbir Ahmad
Affectee
Ghazi Hamlet
27
Sher Khan
Affectee
Darra Muhat
WAPDA
August 2011
village HADAF
A-11
Name of Participants
Designation
Department/ Village
28
Adeel Khan
ARY Reporter
Ghazi
29
Abdul Rashid
S.D.P.O
Forest Dept
30
M. Afsar
Affectee
Darra Mohat
31
Affecters/NGO
Hamlet Ghazi
32
Mushtaq Malik
Affectees
Ghazi Hamlet
33
Ex-chairman
Ghazi/Ghari Meera
34
Rab Nawaz
Affectees
Ghari Meera
35
Ex-Nazim Ghazi
Ghazi
36
Javed Iqbal
Journalist
Press
37
Hazrat Umar
G. M. Tarbell
WAPDA
38
PA T4th Extension
WAPDA, Tarbela
39
Arshad khan
GBTI
40
Adeel Nasir
Piplian
41
Faisal Zaman
Ex MPA
Ghazi
42
Khurshid
Ex Councellor
Ghazi
43
Prof. Khurshid
A.P
44
Shahid Ali
Affectee
Ghazi
45
Rashid Zaman
Student
Khalo
46
Muhammad Idrees
Press/Bureau chief
Khndi
47
Abdul Hafeez
Sr. Sociologist
MMP
Designation
Department/Village
1.
Tamraiz Khan
Affectee
Village Khabal
2.
Ejaz
Affectee
Village Khabbal
3.
Sarzamin
Affectee
Galla
4.
M. Shareen
Affectee
Galla
5.
Khalid Ghafoor
YADs President
Topi/YAD organization
6.
Asad Aman
Foreseer
7.
Mohammad Rafiq
General Librarian
Hamlet
WAPDA
August 2011
A-12
Name
Designation
Department/Village
8.
Javed Khan
Ex-Nazim
Hamlet Pehur
9.
Akmal Zeb
Affectee
Thandkoi
10.
Iftikhar Ahmad
11.
Yaser Mohammad
Affectee
Topi
12.
Azmat Ali
Journalist
13.
Momen Khan
Fisherman
Galla
14.
Saleh Mohammad
Fisherman
Galla
15.
Sardar Shehza
Afectees
Sobra
16.
Taufeeq Zaman
17.
M. Sajjad
In charge Encroachments
Corporation Toll
18.
President/social
organization
Tanzeem-e-Naujawanane-Topi
19.
Amjad Ali
Vice president
Press
20.
Niaz Mohammad
Affectee
21.
Mohammad Asfan
Sr. Engineer
22.
Muhammad Shafiq
Admin officer
GIK Institute
23.
Javed Zaman
Affectee
Kotha
24.
Hafeez
Affectee
Topi
25.
Tanveer Alam
Politics
Topi
26.
Gul Hayat
Nazim
27.
SMO
28.
Saryat Khan
Manager Warid
SAD/IDM
29.
Javed Ahmad
Pontian
30.
Ikram-ullah
Pontian
31.
Ahmed Waheed
C.E.(P)Tarbela
WAPDA
32.
Usman Sher
Manager Research
GIKI
33.
Khan Mohammad
School Teacher
Education
34.
Siddiq Ahmed
Education
35.
Abdur Rasheed
Affectee
Pehur Hamlet
36.
Khaista Khan
Affectee
Pehur Hamlet
37.
WAPDA
August 2011
WAPDA Tarbell\a
A-13
Name
Designation
Department/Village
38.
Abul kalam
WAPDA
39.
S. Munsif Shah
PD Tarbela 4th
WAPDA
40.
Khurshid Anwar
Project Director
Tarbell WAPDA
41.
Zafar Mohammad
P.A
Tarbell WAPDA
42.
Arshad
Affectees
Nilab
43.
M. Saeed
President/Social
organization
44.
Sajid Zaman
Fisherman
Batakara
45.
Waqar Ahmad
Social worker
Batakara
46.
Fayyaz Khalid
MFO T4 JVC
T4 Extension Project
47.
DPM
T4 Consultant JV
48.
Niaz Mohammad
Affectee
Khalo
49.
Abdul Hafeez
Sr. Sociologist
MMP
of Designation
Department/
Organization
Contact No
1.
Head Agriculture
Global
Change 051-2077300
Impacts Study Center
Islamabad
2.
Rashiq Ahhmer
A. A. E
Dept. of Archeology
3.
A.D (Ecology)
WAPDA
042Environment
Cell, 35842653
Sunny view Lahore
4.
Khursheed Anwar
PD 4th Extension
WAPDA, Tarbela
0995-662013
5.
Chief
Environmentalist
MM Pakistan
03004739866
6.
Azmat Beg
Principal
Environmentalist
MM Pakistan Lahore
03334535623
7.
Dir. Research
PMAS Arid
University
Rawalpindi
8.
Ghazanfar Ali
Head
Sector
WAPDA
August 2011
Water GCISC
051-2202694
Agri. 0333510784
03215573711
A-14
Name
Participants
of Designation
9.
Tanveir
Abbasi
Rizwan Manager
10.
Ashfaq A. Khawar
11.
Waseem
Khan
12.
Dr. Waseem
13.
Ishteqaq
Kokab
14.
Abdul Hafeez
15.
Safeguard Officer
Department/
Organization
Contact No
MM Pakistan
03015452005
ADD / SUO
03215827597
Ahmad Chairman
Pakistan
Wildlife 03335214333
Foundation
Asst. Prof
03015710104
Sr. Sociologist
MM Pakistan
03334236494
Saadullah Ayaz
CC Coordinator
IUCN Pakistan
2271027
16.
Numair Aman
HSE
Laraib Energy
03005552418
17.
RRC
M/O
Water
Power
and 9244600
18.
Fareed Rokhany
EA ( C)
M/O
Water
Power
and 9244623
19.
ACD
Environment
UNDP
8355641
20.
Qudsia Siddiqui
Env. JPSO
UNRCO
8355646
21.
Aneeza Rafique
Student
NUST
03434432841
22.
Professor
IESE, NUST
90854308
23.
Mariyam Siddiq
Student
IESE, NUST
24.
Student
IESE, NUST
25.
Sameera Zaib
Environmentalist
Project Procurement
26.
P. M. Moshabbir
RSP Water
WRRI,
PARC
27.
Director
28.
Tanvir Mohmmud
National
Prog. 7th Floor UNIDO
Coordinator
03335678078
29.
Programme
Officer
8354814
30.
Iman Malik
31.
DPM, MEAs
Ministry
Environment
32.
Ayesha Asghar
NUST Scholar
NUST
WAPDA
August 2011
NARC
UNIDO
03459325118
/ 9255074
of 9245605
A-15
Name
Participants
of Designation
Department/
Organization
Contact No
33.
M. Hanif Shareef
Regional Manager
MM Pakistan
03008545493
34.
Zahoor Ahmad
RSA
MM Pakistan
03325513080
35.
Riffat Qamar
DG
W&C
0519250345
36.
Sher Afzal
AD
impact)
37.
M. Omer Khalid
Envr. Specialist
World Bank
03335314736
38.
Col Aqil
Project Manager
MM Pakistan
03335324736
39.
M. Imran
Account Officer
MM Pakistan
03455070837
40.
Naeem-ul-Hassan
Admin Asst.
MMP
03015117949
41.
Ghulam Ali
BD Coordinator
MMP
03335518722
WAPDA
August 2011
(Social IESCO
03212495221
A-16
Designation
Department/Village
Contact No.
Dir (M&E)
P & D Deptt.
0333-9061578
Sajjad Ali
DFO (WL)
WLD. KP
0300-5910807
Nawaz Khattak
EDO Agri
0300-5857393
Uman Ahad
AD (EIA)
EPA
0333-9481997
M. Younas Khan
Monitoring
Inspector
EPA
0308-5875385
Jawad Ali
MI
EPA
0313-5216652
Shahid Hamid
CE TDP
WAPDA
0300-5795242
Ishtiqaq A. Kokab
Director
0301-5710104
Purdil Khan
Advisor
10
Rana A. Dastagir
Ecologist
11
Khursheed Anwar
12
13
Zahid Abbas
14
Gul Muhammad
15
Muhammad Shafiq
16
042-35842603
WAPDA
0321-9897172
WAPDA
0301-5525180
Assistant PD Irrigation
4th Extension
0333-9055123
PD
Extension
th
Forest Department
0300-5615473
SSRO
0333-9327424
Gauher Rehman
PM
MMP
091-5254188
17
M. Nasim Golra
P.D FORD
Irrigation
9213700
18
Jehangir Shah
S. SO
PCSIR, S&T
0300-5884194
19
Inayat-ur-Rehman
SO
PCSIR, Peshawar
0333-9613475
20
Turab Shah
Planning
MMP/Peshawar
Branch
0332-9230940
21
Neelam Asad
E.T
EPA-KPK
9210148
22
Rubina Noor
AD
EPA-KPK
9210148
23
Prof
UET-Peshawar
0301-8993556
24
Ahmad Nawaz
A. A Eng
Archaeology
Peshawar
0300-5822734
25
A/C
Archaeology
Peshawar
0300-5951342
WAPDA
August 2011
A-17
Name
Designation
Department/Village
Contact No.
26
Gulshan
Photographer
Roznama Mashriq
0333-9142090
27
AD(R&S)
0333-9399400
28
Abul Kalam
Sr. Engr.
T 4th Ext.
WAPDA
HP, 0345-5999964
29
Prof
Inst.
of
chemical 0333-9322129
sciences Univ. of
Peshawar
30
Prof
Director
31
Shakeel Chander
Advocate
32
Asif Shehzada
DD (P)
091-9210282
33
Alamgir Sultan
Intern
EPA
0334-9035612
34
Chief Water
P&D Department
35
Javed Khattak
SDO
Irrigation
0304-4478228
36
Iftikhar Ahmad
Engineer
NESPAK
0321-9819814
37
Mohsin Ali
GIS analyst
MMP
0345-4199534
38
Abdul Hafeez
Senior
Sociologist
MMP
0333-4236494
39
Abuzar Afghan
Site inspector
MMP
0300-8010479
40
Basharat Ali
Office
Assistant
MMP
0314-9909908
WAPDA
August 2011
091-821848
0300-8590241
A-18
Meeting Place
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
26
27
WAPDA
August 2011
A-19
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Meeting Place
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
WAPDA
August 2011
A-20
59
60
Meeting Place
shaafique
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
Naveed
72
73
74
76
77
78
80
81
82
83
84
WAPDA
August 2011
A-21
Meeting Place
85
86
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Contact. No
Khursheed Anwar
0995-662013
Purdil Khan
Muhammad
Khalid
Farhea Irshad
M. Iqbal Shah
Maqbool Bangash
Ali Hussain
WAPDA
August 2011
Omar Environmental
Islamabad
0333-9322510
Specialist, 0333-5170767
0333-7599914
A-22
Name
Contact. No
10
Kalam
0345-5999964
11
Munazza Rafique
Agri,.Soil Specialist
0301-7053660
730,G.M (LA&R)
House, Lahore
12
Samimo Panni
WAPDA
Assistant Anthropologist
0345-4013123
LA&R, WAPDA
13
Ahsan Shah
Assistant
M&E
LA&R, WAPDA
14
15
Irrigation
WAPDA
16
Raheel Mustefa
17
Haris Basharat
Assistant
Community 0321-8426969
Development Specialist
18
Ayaz-ul-Haq
Student
Swabi
19
Iftekhar Mali,
MFO
0344-4370080
20
Asif Sahibzada
0938-271889
21
Zahir Hussain
22
Said Kamal
23
Hazrat Omar
G.M Tarbela
24
Amin-ul-haq
S.E. Tarbela
0345-9694678
25
S.E (R&L)
0345-9428326
26
Wazir-ur-rehman
Jr. Engineer
0301-9706377
27
Polail Khan
0300-9052210
28
Javaid Iqbal
0333-5059712
29
Saleem Shahzad
0300-5813331
30
Javed Ahmed
Primary
Batakara
31
Ikram ullah
0300-9343294
32
Muqaddam Khan
Dawn Correspondent
0301-8350258
33
Engr.Raz Muhammad
Tehsil
Management 0345-7932460
Administration Swabi
34
Faseer
S.S.G WAPDA
WAPDA
August 2011
Specialist
Specialist 0321-9621432
0321-5119979
LA&R, 0334-9955870
0300-5315110
(Environmentalist), 0301-8990542
School
0937-873606
Teacher
0301-5072019
A-23
Name
Contact. No
35
Mushtaq Chaudhry
Driver
0332-5645874
36
Farman Shah
Mat
0345-9707720
37
Abdul Wahab
Assistant
Ghazi
38
Muhammad Asim
Jr. Clerk
0301-8342582
39
Salim Khan
ATD
0334-9495312
40
Aziz ullah
Head Mali
41
Nisar Ahmad
ACO Swabi
0345-4744721
42
Zafran
Affectee/ Mali
0343-5974095
43
Zard Ali
Forest Guard
0345-59171904
44
Arslan Khan
Affectee/ Mali
45
Mazhar
Jang Newspaper
46
Sareen
Driver
0346-9801669
47
Ahmad Waheed
CECP
0346-5627230
48
S. Bashir Ahmad
RE (E)
0345-9184105
49
Sultan Zeb
Sub. Engineer
50
Rawind Ali
S.S
51
Abid Ahmad
0302-5680813
52
Adeel Khan
0313-5045066
53
Wajid Ali
0300-5333306
54
Noor Zaman
0347-5228818
55
Fareed Khan
0300-8585695
56
Peon
0306-8307907
57
Meer Amin
Attendent
58
Zahid Hussain
Carpenter
59
Wajid Hussain
Jr. Engr.
60
Sultan Nadeem
XEN
61
Noor Muhammad
Sr. Photographer
62
M. Shahbaz
63
M. Rafiq
64
Taous Khan
WAPDA
August 2011
Education
Officer 0312-9277792
0332-9411768
A-24
Name
Contact. No
65
Gul
66
67
Haji Jannat
68
Khaista Khan
69
Khursheed
70
Asad
71
Fazal Hussain
72
73
74
Gul Badhah
0303-3180790
75
Sajid Ali
Affected person
0302-5137357
76
Mohammad Farooq
0334-8697544
77
Gharis Nawaz
Sr. Engineer
0332-5056159
78
Azeem Khan
03345-616422
79
0306-5041449
0300-9767063
0995611846
80
Firdoos Khan
0344-9417288
81
M. Usman
0308-5671073
82
A.Munir
Sub Engineer
0300-5680298
83
Humayun Khan
Sr. Store
person
84
Pervez Shah
Attendant
0345-8985152
85
Abdul Waheed
Affected person
0346-5594233
86
Shah Alam
Sr. Clerk
0334-5608213
87
Fazal Wahab
Affected person
03085597030
88
Aziz-ur-Rehman
0321-5217052
89
Naveed Ahmed
0345-9500891
90
0345-970595955
91
M.Naseem Khan
Sr. Engineer
033-9454331
92
Rehmat Shah
Sr. Engineer
0300-5840871
WAPDA
August 2011
Keeper/
Affected 0345-9691744
A-25
Name
Contact. No
93
Faisal
0345-5950350
94
Javeed Akhter
Sr. Engineer
0300-5829300
95
Ihsan-ulah
Sr. Engineer
0300-5196440
96
Qamar Zaman
Sr. Engineer
0300-5196440
97
Firdous Khan
0344-9417288
98
99
Abdul Rasheed
S.D.F.O Ghazi
0300-8350212
100
Shabir
Press Reporter
0301-5107983
101
Safder Khan
0300-9195415
102
Naseer Ahmed
A.S.A
0345-6121357
103
Iqbal Shah
0346-9804978
104
Khanzad Shah
0334-5524732
105
Naser Iqbal
Ex.Nazim Ghazi
0300-9787113
106
Umer Khalid
Organizer PTI
0300-9712004
WAPDA
August 2011
A-26
Annex B:
Table B.1:
Fa
Vernacular
mily
Name
Mimosaceae
Phulai
Medicinal Uses
Mimosaceae
Kikar
Ageratum conyziodes L
Asteraceae
Neel Kanthi
Mimosaceae
Sreeia
Artemisia scoparia
Asteraceae
Chaho
Papilionaceae
Tindani
Fisch.
as fuel.
6
Boerhavia procumbens
Nyctaginaceae
It-Sit
Papilionaceae
Chachra
Banks ex Roxb.
7
Butea monosperma O.
Ktz
birth in women.
8
Buddlejaceae
Banna
Asclepiadaceae
Aq
Ait. f.
skin diseases.
10
Apocynaceae
Garanda
Haines
11
Cassia occidentalis L.
Caesalpiniaceae
Kaswandi
12
Pailionaceae
Shesham
WAPDA
August 2011
B-1
13
Fa
Vernacular
mily
Name
Sapindaceae
Sanatha
Medicinal Uses
Jacq.
Ficus benghalensis L.
Moraceae
Bohar
15
Moraceae
Phugwara
16
Leliaceae
Draik
Pers.
17
Morus alba L.
Moraceae
Marrotch
18
Morus nigra L.
Moraceae
Marrotch
19
Taraxacum officinalis
Asteraceae
Hund
Rhamnaceae
Sezan
Rhamnaceae
Sezan
Webber
Ziziphus nummularia
20
Table B.2:
Location
Vegetation of the powerhouse area (along slopes
from base to 100 m above)
Vegetative Species
Lantana camara, Leucaena leucocephala, Pinus
roxburghii, Dodonaea viscosa, Acacia modesta and
Acacia nilotica, Ficus spp., Morus spp., Dalbergia sissoo,
Carissa opaca, Otostegia limbata, Maytenus royleana and
Ziziphus mauritiana,
WAPDA
August 2011
B-2
Vegetative Species
Buddleja asiatica, Dodonaea viscose, Themeda anathera,
Acacia modesta and Rumex hastatus, Malvastrum
coromandelianum, Oxalis corniculata, Boerhavia
procumbens, Trifolium repens and Micromeria biflora.
Vegetation of Haripur
Vegetation of Swabi
WAPDA
August 2011
B-3
Vegetative Species
Trees:
WAPDA
August 2011
B-4
Table B.3:
Family
Habit
Habitat
Papilionaceae
Tree
Dry conditions
Duranta repens L.
Verbenaceae
Tree
Dry conditions
Eucalyptus sp.
Myrtaceae
Tree
Jasminum humile, L.
Oleaceae
Shrub
Msic conditions
Lagerstroemia indica L.
Myrtaceae
Tree
Dry places
Leucaena leucocephala
Tree
Dry
Oleaceae
Shrub
Dry places
Pinaceae
Tree
Xeric conditions
Tree
Mesic conditions
(Lam.) R. de Wit.
7
Ligustrum ovalifolium
Mimosaceae
Hassk.
8
Pterospermum acerifolium
L.
Table B.4:
Sterculiaceae
Location
Road sides
Vegetative Species
Jacaranda mimosaefolia D. Don, Bauhinia purpurea
Linn., Cassia fistula Linn. Delonix regia (Boj.) Raf.,
Lagerstroemia flosreginae Retz., Magnolia grandiflora
Linn., Salix babylonica Linn., Mimusops elengi Linn.
and Hibiscus rosa-sinensis,
Labor camps
Powerhouse area
WAPDA
August 2011
B-5
Table B.5:
Zoological Name
Family
Black Redstart
Phoenicurus ochruros
Muscicapidae
Eurasian Blackbird
Turdus merula
Muscicapidae
Blue-whistling Thrush
Myophonus caeruleus
Muscicapidae
Montocola solitaries
Muscicapidae
Desert Wheatear
Oenanthe deserti
Muscicapidae
Plain Martin
Riparia diluta
Hirundinidae
Carpodacus erythrinus
Fringillidae
Common Starling
Sturnus vulgaris
Sturnidae
Common Myna
Acridotheres tristris
Sturnidae
10
Bank Myna
Acridotheres ginginianus
Sturnidae
11
White Wagtail
Motacilla alba
Motacillidae
12
Motacilla maderaspatensis
Motacillidae
13
Golden Oriole
Oriolus oriolus
Oriolidae
14
Common Babbler
Turdoides caudatus
Sylviidae
15
Jungle Babbler
Turdoides striatus
Sylviidae
16
Common Chiffchaff
Phylloscopus collybita
Phyllooscopidae
17
Greenish Warbler
Phylloscopus trochiloides
Sylviidae
18
Crested Lark
Galerida cristata
Alaudidae
19
House Sparrow
Passer domestica
Passeridae
20
White-throated Kingfisher
Halcyon smyrnensis
Alcedinidae
21
Lanius schach
Laniidae
22
White-cheeked bulbul
Pycnonotus leucogenys
Pycnonotidae
23
Red-vented Bulbul
Pycnonotus cafer
Pycnonotidae
24
Black Kite
Milvus migrans
Accipitridae
25
Eurasian Sparrowhawk
Accipter nisus
Accipitridae
26
Common Kestrel
Falco tinnunculus
Falconidae
27
Black Francolin
Francolinus francolinus
Phasianidae
28
Grey Francolin
Francolinus pondicerianus
Phasianidae
29
Rock Pigeon
Columba livia
Columbidae
30
Streptopelia orintalis
Columbidae
31
Laughing Dove
Streptopelia senegalensis
Columbidae
32
Streptopelia decaocta
Columbidae
33
Common Sandpiper
Actitis hypoleucos
Scolopacidae
34
Little Stint
Calidris minuta
Scolopacidae
35
Eurasian Cuckoo
Cuculus canorus
Cuculidae
WAPDA
August 2011
B-6
Zoological Name
Family
36
Common Hoope
Upupa epops
Upupidae
37
Mallard
Anus Platyrhynchos
Anatidae
38
Common Moorhen
Gallinula Choloropus
Rallidae
39
Common Coot
Fulica atra
Rallidae
40
Little Grebe
Tachybaptus ruficollis
Podicipedidae
41
Little Cormorant
Phalacrocorax niger
Phalacrocoracidae
42
Little Egret
Egretta garzetta
Ardeidae
43
Cattle Egret
Bubulcus ibis
Ardeidae
44
Pond Heron
Ardeola grayii
Ardeidae
45
Common Snipe
Gallinago Gallinago
Scolopacidae
46
Red-wattled Lapwing
Vanellusindicus
Caradriidae
47
Dendrocitta vagabunda
Corvidae
48
House Crow
Corvus Splendens
Corvidae
49
Black Drongo
Dicrurus macrocercus
Corvidae
50
Blue Throat
Erithacus svecicus
Muscicapidae
51
Caspian Tern
Sterna caspia
Rallidae
52
Anthus rufulus
Motacillidae
Table B.6:
Local Name
Scientific Name
Indigenous Species
Seenghara
Mystus seenghala
Seenghara
Mystus aor
Masher
Mullah
Schizothorax spp.
Goonch
Bagarius bagarius
Sunnee
Cirrhinus reba
Daula
Saul
Mullee
Channa punctatus
Channa marulius
Wallago attu
Talapia
Oreochromis mosombica
Bam
Mastacembelus armatus
Pari
Notopterus notopterus
Sareeha
Kharni
Labeo gonius
Puntius sarana
Cultivated Species
WAPDA
August 2011
B-7
Scientific Name
Mori
Cirrhinus mrigala
Rohu
Labeo rohita
Thaila
Catla catla
Grass carp
Silver carp
Hypophthalmichthys molitrix
Gulfam
Cyprinus carpio
Table B.7:
Family
Local Name
Endemic species
1
Notopteridae
Pari
Cyprinidae
Chilwa
Cyprinidae
Chilwa
Cyprinidae
Poongh
Cyprinidae
Chun
Cyprinidae
Swati
Cyprinidae
Swati
Cyprinidae
Pathar chatt
Cyprinidae
Goloo
10
Cyprinidae
Poonngh
11
Cyprinidae
Mori
12
Cyprinidae
Mahasheer
13
Cyprinidae
Chiddu
14
Cyprinidae
Chiddu
15
Cobitidae
Chipper
16
Nemacheilidae
Zebra
17
Nemacheilidae
Zebra
18
Nemacheilidae
Zebra
Banarescu)
19
Nemacheilidae
Zebra
20
Nemacheilidae
Zebra
21
Schilbeidae
22
Sisoridae
Chotat Khagga
23
Sisoridae
Chota Khagga
24
Sisoridae
Peela Kingar
WAPDA
August 2011
B-8
Family
Local Name
25
Bagridae
Kingar
26
Belontidae
Kanghi
27
Mastacemblidae
Sanp Machli
28
Channidae
Dola
Channidae
Saul
Cyprinidae
Grass Carp
Cyprinidae
Silver Carp
Cyprinidae
Grass Carp
Cichlidae
Toffee
Exotic Species
WAPDA
August 2011
B-9
Annex C.
Introduction
The Contractor can also prepare a Construction Environmental Action Plan (CEAP)
demonstrating the manner in which the Contractor will comply with the requirements of
ECPs and the mitigation measures proposed in the EMMP of the ESA Report. The CEAP
will form the part of the contract documents and will be used as monitoring tool for
compliance. Violation of the compliance requirements will be treated as non-compliance
leading to the corrections or otherwise imposing penalty on the contractors.
WAPDA
August 2011
C-1
Hazardous
Waste
Environmental
Impacts
Soil and water pollution
from the improper
management of wastes
and excess materials
from the construction
sites.
WAPDA
August 2011
C-2
Environmental Impacts
Fuels
and Materials used in
hazardous
construction have a
goods.
potential to be a source of
contamination. Improper
storage and handling of
fuels, lubricants,
chemicals and hazardous
goods/materials on-site,
and potential spills from
these goods may harm the
environment or health of
construction workers.
WAPDA
August 2011
C-3
Environmental Impacts
Hazardous
Water pollution from the
Material
and storage, handling and
Waste
disposal of hazardous
materials and general
construction waste, and
accidental spillage
WAPDA
August 2011
C-4
Project
Activity/
Impact Source
Environmental Impacts
Construction
Construction works in the
activities
in water bodies will increase
water bodies
sediment and
contaminant loading, and
effect habitat of fish and
other aquatic biology.
Drinking water
Groundwater at shallow
depths might be
contaminated and hence
not suitable for drinking
purposes.
WAPDA
August 2011
C-5
Environmental Impacts
Ponding
water
WAPDA
August 2011
C-6
Environmental Impacts
Storage
of Spillage of hazardous
hazardous and and toxic chemicals will
toxic chemicals contaminate the soils
Construction
Erosion from
material stock construction material
piles
stockpiles may
contaminate the soils
WAPDA
August 2011
C-7
Construction
activities and
material
stockpiles
Environmental Impacts
WAPDA
August 2011
C-8
Environmental Impacts
WAPDA
August 2011
C-9
Construction
machinery
Environmental Impacts
Construction
activities
WAPDA
August 2011
C-10
Construction
machinery
Construction
activity
WAPDA
August 2011
Environmental Impacts
C-11
Environmental Impacts
WAPDA
August 2011
C-12
Environmental Impacts
The location of
construction activities can
result in the loss of wild
life habitat and habitat
quality,.
Impact on migratory
birds, its habitat and its
active nests
Vegetation
clearance
Construction
camps
WAPDA
August 2011
Clearance of vegetation
may impact shelter,
feeding and/or breeding
and/or physical
destruction and severing
of habitat areas
Illegal poaching
C-13
Environmental Impacts
Construction
activities in
River
Construction
activities on the
land
WAPDA
August 2011
C-14
Environmental Impacts
WAPDA
August 2011
C-15
Environmental Impacts
Siting and
Location of
construction
camps
Campsites for
construction workers are
the important locations
that have significant
impacts such as health
and safety hazards on
local resources and
infrastructure of nearby
communities.
Construction
Camp Facilities
Lack of proper
infrastructure facilities,
such as housing, water
supply and sanitation
facilities will increase
pressure on the local
services and generate
substandard living
standards and health
hazards.
WAPDA
August 2011
C-16
Project
Activity/
Impact Source
Disposal of
waste
Environmental Impacts
Management of wastes is
crucial to minimize
impacts on the
environment
WAPDA
August 2011
C-17
Project
Activity/
Impact Source
Environmental Impacts
Fuel supplies
for cooking
purposes
Health and
Hygiene
WAPDA
August 2011
C-18
Project
Activity/
Impact Source
Safety
Site Restoration
Environmental Impacts
In adequate safety
facilities to the
construction camps may
create security problems
and fire hazards
Restoration of the
construction camps to
original condition
requires demolition of
construction camps.
WAPDA
August 2011
C-19
WAPDA
August 2011
Environmental
Impacts
Disturbance from
The Contractor shall:
construction works to
- Communicate to the public through community
the cultural and religious
consultation and newspaper announcements
sites, and contractors
regarding the scope and schedule of construction,
lack of knowledge on
as well as certain construction activities causing
cultural issues cause
disruptions or access restriction.
- Do not block access to cultural and religious
social disturbances.
sites, wherever possible
- Restrict all construction activities within the foot
prints of the construction sites.
- Stop construction works that produce noise
(particularly during prayer time) should there be
any mosque/religious/educational institutions
close to the construction sites and users make
objections.
- Take special care and use appropriate equipment
when working next to a cultural/religious
institution.
- Stop work immediately and notify the site
manager if, during construction, an
archaeological or burial site is discovered. It is an
offence to recommence work in the vicinity of
the site until approval to continue is given by the
PMU
- Provide separate prayer facilities to the
construction workers.
- Show appropriate behavior with all construction
workers especially women and elderly people
- Allow the workers to participate in praying
during construction time
- Resolve cultural issues in consultation with local
leaders and supervision consultants
- Establish a mechanism that allows local people to
raise grievances arising from the construction
process.
- Inform the local authorities responsible for
health, religious and security duly informed
before commencement of civil works so as to
maintain effective surveillance over public
health, social and security matters
C-20
Environmental Impacts
Accidents
WAPDA
August 2011
C-21
Project
Activity/
Impact Source
Environmental Impacts
Construction
Camps
Lack of proper
infrastructure facilities,
such as housing, water
supply and sanitation
facilities will increase
pressure on the local
services and generate
substandard living
standards and health
hazards.
Water and
sanitation
facilities at the
construction
sites
WAPDA
August 2011
C-22
Project
Activity/
Impact Source
Environmental Impacts
Trainings
WAPDA
August 2011
C-23
Annex D.
WAPDA
August 2011
D-1
1 Defined as the exercise of professional skill, diligence, prudence and foresight that
3
3
17
24
32
35
45
51
53
59
60
62
64
68
70
72
72
73
74
77
77
78
79
82
82
85
86
89
89
92
94
96
significant impacts.
3 Defined as threats to humans and what they value (Kates, et al., 1985).
4 Defined as quantitative measures of hazard consequences, usually expressed as
1.0 Environmental
1.1
Process modification
Regulatory requirements
sources which, for example, can contribute a net emissions increase of one or
more of the following pollutants within a given airshed: PM10: 50 tons per year
(tpy); NOx: 500 tpy; SO2: 500 tpy; or as established through national legislation;
and combustion sources with an equivalent heat input of 50 MWth or greater. The
significance of emissions of inorganic and organic pollutants should be established
on a project-specific basis taking into account toxic and other properties of the
pollutant.
6 United States Environmental Protection Agency, Prevention of Significant
Deterioration of Air Quality, 40 CFR Ch. 1 Part 52.21. Other references for
establishing significant emissions include the European Commission. 2000.
Guidance Document for EPER implementation.
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ippc/eper/index.htm ; and Australian Government.
2004. National Pollutant Inventory Guide.
http://www.npi.gov.au/handbooks/pubs/npiguide.pdf
7 World Health Organization (WHO). Air Quality Guidelines Global Update, 2005.
PM 24-hour value is the 99th percentile.
8 Interim targets are provided in recognition of the need for a staged approach to
achieving the recommended guidelines.
9 Ambient air quality standards are ambient air quality levels established and
published through national legislative and regulatory processes, and ambient
quality guidelines refer to ambient quality levels primarily developed through
clinical, toxicological, and epidemiological evidence (such as those published by
the World Health Organization).
10 Available at World Health Organization (WHO). http://www.who.int/en
11 For example the United States National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Averaging
Period
Guideline value in
g/m3
24-hour
10 minute
1-year
1-hour
1-year
24-hour
Particulate Matter
PM2.5
1-year
24-hour
Ozone
8-hour daily
maximum
non-degraded airsheds.
Point Sources
rural area).
activities.
Stack Height
The stack height for all point sources of emissions, whether
significant or not, should be designed according to GIIP (see
Annex 1.1.3) to avoid excessive ground level concentrations due
to downwash, wakes, and eddy effects, and to ensure reasonable
diffusion to minimize impacts. For projects where there are
multiple sources of emissions, stack heights should be established
with due consideration to emissions from all other project sources,
both point and fugitive. Non-significant sources of emissions,
height.
14 An airshed should be considered as having poor air quality if nationally
legislated air quality standards or WHO Air Quality Guidelines are exceeded
significantly.
15 Emission points refer to a specific stack, vent, or other discrete point of pollution
release. This term should not be confused with point source, which is a regulatory
distinction from area and mobile sources. The characterization of point sources
into multiple emissions points is useful for allowing more detailed reporting of
emissions information.
16 Small combustion sources are those with a total rated heat input capacity of
50MWth or less.
17 The contribution of a fuel is the percentage of heat input (LHV) provided by this
fuel multiplied by its limit value.
Table 1.1.2 - Small Combustion Facilities Emissions Guidelines (3MWth 50MWth) (in mg/Nm3 or as indicated)
Combustion Technology /
Fuel
N/A
N/A
15
Engine
Gas
Liquid
Turbine
Natural Gas
=3MWth to < 15MWth
15
N/A
N/A
15
Natural Gas
=15MWth to < 50MWth
N/A
N/A
25 ppm
15
N/A
15
N/A
74 ppm
15
N/A
320
2000
460
2000
650
Boiler
Gas
Liquid
Solid
N/A
50 or up to 150 if justified by environmental
assessment
50 or up to 150 if justified by environmental
assessment
Notes: -N/A/ - no emissions guideline; Higher performance levels than these in the Table should be applicable to facilities located in urban / industrial areas with degraded airsheds or close to ecologically sensitive areas where more
stringent emissions controls may be needed.; MWth is heat input on HHV basis; Solid fuels include biomass; Nm 3 is at one atmosphere pressure, 0C.; MWth category is to apply to the entire facility consisting of multiple units that are
reasonably considered to be emitted from a common stack except for NOx and PM limits for turbines and boilers. Guidelines values apply to facilities operating more than 500 hours per year with an annual capacity utilization factor of
more than 30 percent.
Fugitive Sources
time period.18
solvents;
18 For more information, see Leak Detection and Repair Program (LDAR), at:
http://www.ldar.net
include:
be considered:
alternatives
o
regulations.20
the project.
include:
Carbon financing;23
Energy Conservation);
greenhouse gases;
forestry;
Monitoring
10
that data quality is adequate for the intended data use (e.g.,
monitoring.
http://www.cen.eu/catweb/cwen.htm .
28 The National Environmental Methods Index provides a searchable
clearinghouse of U.S. methods and procedures for both regulatory and nonregulatory monitoring purposes for water, sediment, air and tissues, and is
available at http://www.nemi.gov/.
11
12
13
Annex 1.1.2 Illustrative Point Source Air Emissions Prevention and Control Technologies
Principal Sources and Issues
Control Options
Reduction
Efficiency (%)
Gas
Condition
Comments
Fabric Filters
99 - 99.7%
97 99%
Varies
depending of
particle type
Cyclone
74 95%
None
Wet Scrubber
93 95%
None
Fuel Switching
>90%
Sorbent Injection
30% - 70%
Calcium or lime is injected into the flue gas and the SO2 is adsorbed onto the
sorbent
70%-90%
>90%
Alternate fuels may include low sulfur coal, light diesel or natural gas with
consequent reduction in particulate emissions related to sulfur in the fuel. Fuel
cleaning or beneficiation of fuels prior to combustion is another viable option but
may have economic consequences.
14
Annex 1.1.2: Illustrative Point Source Air Emissions Prevention and Control Technologies (continued)
Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx)
Associated with combustion of fuel.
May occur in several forms of nitrogen
oxide; namely nitric oxide (NO),
nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and nitrous
oxide (N2O), which is also a
greenhouse gas. The term NOx
serves as a composite between NO
and NO2 and emissions are usually
reported as NOx. Here the NO is
multiplied by the ratio of molecular
weights of NO2 to NO and added to
the NO2 emissions.
Means of reducing NOx emissions are
based on the modification of operating
conditions such as minimizing the
resident time at peak temperatures,
reducing the peak temperatures by
increasing heat transfer rates or
minimizing the availability of oxygen.
Comments
Combustion modification
(Illustrative of boilers)
Coal
Oil
Gas
Low-excess-air firing
1030
1030
1030
Staged Combustion
2050
2050
2050
N/A
2050
2050
Water/Steam Injection
N/A
1050
N/A.
Low-NOx Burners
3040
3040
3040
Coal
Oil
Gas
6090
6090
6090
N/A
3070
3070
15
Stack Height
(Based on United States 40 CFR, part 51.100 (ii)).
HG = H + 1.5L; where
Equipment Type
Modification
Approximate
Control
Efficiency
(%)
Seal-less design
10029
Closed-vent system
9030
100
Closed-vent system
90
100
Pumps
structures
Nearby structures = Structures within/touching a radius
of 5L but less than 800 m.
Compressors
Stack
Closed-vent system
Pressure Relief Devices
1.5*L
100
Valves
Seal-less design
100
Connectors
Weld together
100
Open-ended Lines
100
Sampling Connections
Closed-loop sampling
100
HG
h
H
Maximum 5*L
Variable31
16
Control Type
Control
Efficiency
Chemical Stabilization
0% - 98%
Hygroscopic salts
Bitumens/adhesives
60% - 96%
Surfactants
0% - 68%
12% - 98%
Speed Reduction
0% - 80%
Traffic Reduction
Not quantified
85% - 99%
30% - 50%
Vacuum Sweeping
0% - 58%
0% - 96%
17
appropriate levels
Energy Efficiency
For any energy-using system, a systematic analysis of energy
efficiency improvements and cost reduction opportunities should
include a hierarchical examination of opportunities to:
18
Process Heating
below.32
operating capacity
process temperature
32
compression systems.
33 US DOE. http://www.eere.energy.gov/consumer/industry/process.html
19
temperature)
air
Oxygen enrichment/injection
Process Cooling
controls
below.
20
Load Reduction
Energy Conversion
The efficiency of refrigeration service provision is normally
discussed in terms of Coefficient of Performance (COP), which
is the ratio of cooling duty divided by input power. COP is
maximized by effective refrigeration system design and
increased refrigerant compression efficiency, as well as
minimization of the temperature difference through which the
system works and of auxiliary loads (i.e. those in addition to
compressor power demand) used to operate the refrigeration
system.
System Design
summer conditions.
21
generously-sized evaporator.
cooling circuits.
bacteria.
22
contamination.
most important.
condensers.
capacity.
23
down.
Distribution
Load reduction
Do not mix high volume low pressure and low volume high
pressure loads. Decentralize low volume high-pressure
applications or provide dedicated low-pressure utilities, for
example, by using fans rather than compressed air.
24
for irrigation).
generation
25
include:
surface water
or habitats
industry sector
http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/wqcriteria.html
factors including, but not limited to, the total volume of water, flow rate, flushing
rate of the water body and the loading of pollutants from other effluent sources in
APRIL 30, 2007
26
operations.
waters.
regulatory compliance.
Wastewater Management
Industrial Wastewater
should
apply.38
Septic Systems
available in the WHO Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and
Greywater. Volume 2: Wastewater Use in Agriculture
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/wastewater/gsuweg2/en/index.html
considerations;
recommendations;
should be applied:
section below;
contaminated runoff
28
ponds);
present;
sewer systems;
areas.
Sludge from stormwater catchments or collection and
treatment systems may contain elevated levels of pollutants
required.
Sanitary Wastewater
resources.
29
Units
Guideline Value
pH
pH
6 9
BOD
mg/l
30
COD
mg/l
125
Total nitrogen
mg/l
10
Total phosphorus
mg/l
trips and falls into tanks, confined space entries for maintenance
mg/l
10
mg/l
50
MPN b / 100 ml
400a
Notes:
a Not applicable to centralized, municipal, wastewater treatment systems
which are included in EHS Guidelines for Water and Sanitation.
b MPN = Most Probable Number
Monitoring
section of this document and in the EHS Guidelines for Water and
Sanitation.
30
31
pH
Pollutant/Parameter
Phase separation
TSS - Settleable
TSS - Non-Settleable
Biological - Anaerobic
COD - Non-Biodegradable
Coagulation, flocculation,
precipitation, size exclusion
Inorganics / Non-metals
Coagulation, flocculation,
precipitation, size exclusion,
Oxidation, Adsorption
Temperature
TDS
Active Ingredients/Emerging
Contaminants
Radionuclides
Pathogens
Toxicity
Adsorption,Size Exclusion,
Concentration
Disinfection, Sterilization
Adsorption, Oxidation, Size
Exclusion, Concentration
32
techniques.
could be identified.
described above.
33
when needed
Cooling Systems
Water conservation opportunities in cooling systems include:
cooling system
Heating Systems
Heating systems based on the circulation of low or medium
pressure hot water (which do not consume water) should be
closed. If they do consume water, regular maintenance should
be conducted to check for leaks. However, large quantities of
water may be used by steam systems, and this can be reduced
by the following measures:
34
35
and fire) during their production, handling, storage and use. This
36
the Hazmat
fire or explosion;
Using engineering controls (containment, automatic alarms,
and shut-off systems) commensurate with the nature of
Implementing management controls (procedures,
inspections, communications, training, and drills) to address
residual risks that have not been prevented or controlled
through engineering measures.
hazard;
available
Analysis of potential consequences based on the physicalgeographical characteristics of the project site, including
aspects such as its distance to settlements, water resources,
and other environmentally sensitive areas
Management Actions
The management actions to be included in a Hazardous Materials
Management Plan should be commensurate with the level of
Hazard Assessment
The level of risk should be established through an on-going
assessment process based on:
APRIL 30, 2007
37
38
Sheets42
Preventive Measures
Hazardous Materials Transfer
Uncontrolled releases of hazardous materials may result from
small cumulative events, or from more significant equipment
overflow points.
Overfill Protection
Overfills of vessels and tanks should be prevented as they are
deviations, etc.)
42 MSDSs are produced by the manufacturer, but might not be prepared for
prevent overfilling
Control Measures
(float valve)
with primary storage and piping, but their design and construction
storage containers
tanks with a total storage volume equal or greater than 1,000 liters
collection system
40
extent feasible
include:
materials
storage tanks (USTs) and underground piping. If doublewalled systems are used, they should provide a means of
43
High-risk locations are places where the release of product from the storage
system could result in the contamination of drinking water source or those located
in water resource protection areas as designated by local authorities.
41
hazards.48
Management Actions
prevention of accidents.
Authorization requirements
Employees affected
Training needs
Act responsibly
42
their work
similar incidents
inspections.
Preventive Measures
The purpose of preventive measures is to ensure that safetyrelated aspects of the process and equipment are considered,
limits to be placed on the operations are well known, and
accepted standards and codes are adopted, where they apply.
maintenance procedures
o
the process
43
procedures
o
resulting from the fumes, gases, sparks, and hot metal and
response equipment.
conducted
44
45
following:
Facilities.
consequences
46
site storage
Waste Prevention
following strategy:
plant needs
disposal infrastructure
materials
be managed
Manufacturing found at
http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/minimize/lean.htm
47
bioremediation.
Hazardous wastes should always be segregated from nonhazardous wastes. If generation of hazardous waste can not
be prevented through the implementation of the above
general waste management practices, its management
principles:
exchange)
Waste Storage
48
Transportation
environment
environment
or site plan
stored.
49
procurement agreements
should include:
o
indications of loss
available
groundwater)
o
materials in storage
processes
consider using:
Monitoring
50
51
1.7 Noise
Applicability
52
Guidelines 54
Receptor
Daytime
07:00 - 22:00
Nighttime
22:00 - 07:00
Residential; institutional;
educational55
55
45
Industrial; commercial
70
70
Monitoring
Noise monitoring56 may be carried out for the purposes of
establishing the existing ambient noise levels in the area of
the proposed or existing facility, or for verifying operational
phase noise levels.
Noise monitoring programs should be designed and
conducted by trained specialists. Typical monitoring periods
should be sufficient for statistical analysis and may last 48
hours with the use of noise monitors that should be capable
of logging data continuously over this time period, or hourly,
or more frequently, as appropriate (or else cover differing
time periods within several days, including weekday and
weekend workdays). The type of acoustic indices recorded
depends on the type of noise being monitored, as
established by a noise expert. Monitors should be located
approximately 1.5 m above the ground and no closer than 3
54 Guidelines values are for noise levels measured out of doors. Source:
53
concentrations
Contaminated land is a concern because of:
54
contaminants
Risk screening;
2)
3)
4)
Risk Screening
This step is also known as problem formulation for
environmental risk assessment. Where there is potential
evidence of contamination at a site, the following steps are
recommended:
57 BC MOE. http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/epd/epdpa/contam_sites/guidance
58 Massachusetts Department of Environment.
http://www.mass.gov/dep/cleanup
55
described below.
contaminated land
http://www.epa.gov/reg3hwmd/risk/human/index.htm.
hazard.
56
of a comprehensive approach
all of the three risk factors illustrated in Figure 1.8.1. A short list
lands/receptors)
environmental quality.
oxidation)
phase heating)
composting)
collection
Natural attenuation
treatment)
o
Natural attenuation
source in soil
58
59
60
Consequences
A. Almost
certain
B. Likely
Insignificant
C.
Moderate
D. Unlikely
compounds.
E. Rare
Legend
61
Fire Precautions
The workplace should be designed to prevent the start of fires
through the implementation of fire codes applicable to industrial
Lighting
visible
met.
Safe Access
Fire and emergency alarm systems that are both audible and
The IFC Life and Fire Safety Guideline should apply to buildings
present.
ready access
62
falling items
First Aid
Visitor Orientation
Training should consist of basic hazard awareness, sitespecific hazards, safe work practices, and emergency
Air Supply
63
Labeling of Equipment
Hygiene requirements
and accidents
Area Signage
64
Noise
and consequence.
Table 2.3.1.
standards.64
Vibration
64 For example: CSA Z432.04 Safe Guarding of Machinery, CSA Z434 Robot
65
warning signs
Electrical
Location
/activity
Equivalent level
LAeq,8h
Maximum
LAmax,fast
85 dB(A)
110 dB(A)
Light industry
(decreasing
demand for oral
communication)
50-65 dB(A)
Open offices,
control rooms,
service counters or
similar
45-50 dB(A)
Individual offices
(no disturbing
noise)
40-45 dB(A)
Classrooms,
lecture halls
35-40 dB(A)
Hospitals
30-35 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
110 dB(A)
panels, cables, cords and hand tools, can pose a serious risk to
workers. Overhead wires can be struck by metal devices, such as
death;
66 ACGIH, 2005
66
Minimum
distance
3 meters
More than 150,000 volts, but no more than 250,000 4.5 meters
volts
6 meters
Eye Hazards
include:
required.
67
include:
accordingly
Working at Heights
67 ACGIH, 2005
68
emission
necessary PPE
controlled
Illumination
to minimize risks.
Light Intensity
Emergency light
10 lux
20 lux
50 lux
200 lux
500 lux
69
ACGIH 70
personnel
Air Quality
Poor air quality due to the release of contaminants into the work
place can result in possible respiratory irritation, discomfort, or
illness to workers. Employers should take appropriate measures
time
Enclosed operations
area
69 ACGIH, 2005.
68 ACGIH, 2005
70 ACGIH, 2005.
70
chemicals:
following measures:
71
international standards.
groups73:
72
include:
Exposure
Workers
(min.19 years of
age)
20 mSv/year
50 mSv/year
Apprentices
and
students
(16-18 years
of age)
6 mSv/year
150 mSv/year
50 mSv/year
500 mSv/year
150
mSv/year
74 International Basic Safety Standard for protection against Ionizing Radiation and
for the Safety of Radiation Sources and its three interrelated Safety Guides.
IAEA. http://www-ns.iaea.org/standards/documents/default.asp?sub=160
Radiation (ICNIRP).
APRIL 30, 2007
73
by recognized organizations76.
Workplace Hazards
Suggested PPE
Confined Space
A confined space is defined as a wholly or partially enclosed
Eye and
face
protection
Head
protection
Hearing
protection
Noise, ultra-sound.
Foot
protection
Respiratory
protection
Body/leg
protection
Extreme temperatures,
hazardous materials,
biological agents, cutting
and laceration.
Hand
protection
Oxygen deficiency
76
74
contact with the worker at least once every hour, and ensure
appropriate.
2.9 Monitoring
space.
75
monitoring plan.
investigation should:
employment.
a. Fatalities
(number)
a.1 Immediate
b. Non-fatal
injuries
(number) 78
b.1 Less than one
day
b.2 Up to 3 days
b.3 More than 3
days
76
Water Quality
Drinking water sources, whether public or private, should at all
times be protected so that they meet or exceed applicable national
acceptability standards or in their absence the current edition of
WHO Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality. Air emissions,
wastewater effluents, oil and hazardous materials, and wastes
should be managed according to the guidance provided in the
respective sections of the General EHS Guidelines with the
objective of protecting soil and water resources.
Where the project includes the delivery of water to the community
or to users of facility infrastructure (such as hotel hosts and
hospital patients), where water may be used for drinking, cooking,
washing, and bathing, water quality should comply with national
acceptability standards or in their absence the current edition of
with WHO Drinking Water Guidelines. Water quality for more
Water Availability
The potential effect of groundwater or surface water abstraction
for project activities should be properly assessed through a
combination of field testing and modeling techniques, accounting
for seasonal variability and projected changes in demand in the
project area.
77
availability of 100 liters per person per day although lower levels
include:
heavy equipment
respect to:
Existing structures
Site grading
Structural design
Types of construction
Fire-resistant construction
Flood-resistant construction
safework/cops/english/download/e000013.pdf
81
ICC, 2006.
78
Construction materials
Interior environment
life and fire safety (L&FS) standard. The Life Safety Code82, which
and may be used to document compliance with the Life and Fire
these objectives:
engineering practices.
Life and fire safety design criteria for all existing buildings
should incorporate all local building codes and fire
department regulations.
release
The nature and extent of life and fire safety systems required will
http://www.nfpa.org/catalog/product.asp?category%5Fname=&pid=10106&target%
5Fpid=10106&src%5Fpid=&link%5Ftype=search
79
Compartmentation
Separations
Fire walls
Floors
Fire Prevention
Doors
Dampers
ignition sources, and measures needed to limit fast fire and smoke
Ignition sources
Means of Egress
Emergency lighting
and systems are at all times in conformance with life and fire
Building staff
Occupants
Civil defense
80
surrounding areas).
of the project completion test at the time of life and fire safety
Other Hazards
81
information
82
Management Actions
on call 24 hours/day
Authorization requirements
Employees affected
Training needs
Hazard Assessment
92 Threshold quantities for the transport of hazardous materials are found in the UN
Transport of Dangerous Goods Model Regulations cited above.
93
transportation, including:
Preventive Measures
work
program
o
programs
response equipment.
84
Vector-Borne Diseases
modifications.
human settlements
workers
dormitory walls
use
disease reservoirs
effects
measures include:
emergency
Community Notification
Communication systems
Emergency resources
option
Communication Systems
Worker notification and communication
86
Emergency Resources
activities.
Mutual Aid
Medical Services
The company should provide first aid attendants for the
facility as well as medical equipment suitable for the
Contact List
Availability of Resources
case of an emergency include:
should:
Fire Services
in an emergency
87
88
Soil Erosion
Soil erosion may be caused by exposure of soil surfaces to rain
and wind during site clearing, earth moving, and excavation
activities. The mobilization and transport of soil particles may, in
89
Air Quality
Road design
erosion
watercourse crossings
etc.)
Solid Waste
Non-hazardous solid waste generated at construction and
decommissioning sites includes excess fill materials from grading
and excavation activities, scrap wood and metals, and small
concrete spills. Other non-hazardous solid wastes include office,
kitchen, and dormitory wastes when these types of operations are
part of construction project activities. Hazardous solid waste
includes contaminated soils, which could potentially be
encountered on-site due to previous land use activities, or small
90
Wastewater Discharges
used oil filters, and used oil, as well as spill cleanup materials from
oil and fuel spills. Techniques for preventing and controlling non-
Hazardous Materials
Construction and decommissioning activities may pose the
Contaminated Land
the type and risks of the contaminated media, and the intended
transfer areas
respectively
Section 1.6.
91
Work in Heights
Falls from elevation associated with working with ladders,
scaffolding, and partially built or demolished structures are among
the most common cause of fatal or permanent disabling injury at
construction or decommissioning sites. If fall hazards exist, a fall
protection plan should be in place which includes one or more of
the following aspects, depending on the nature of the fall hazard95:
surface
systems can be found in the United States Occupational Health and Safety
Administrations (US OSHA) web site:
http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/fallprotection/index.html
92
Struck By Objects
tools which can result in injury to the head, eyes, and extremities.
Techniques for the prevention and control of these hazards
include:
direct traffic
operating vehicle
Dust
to people or structures
93
protection
including:
local community
Disease Prevention
Increased incidence of communicable and vector-borne diseases
attributable to construction activities represents a potentially
94
Traffic Safety
Construction activities may result in a significant increase in
movement of heavy vehicles for the transport of construction
materials and equipment increasing the risk of traffic-related
accidents and injuries to workers and local communities. The
incidence of road accidents involving project vehicles during
construction should be minimized through a combination of
education and awareness-raising, and the adoption of procedures
described in Section 3.4 (Traffic Safety).
95
Chavasse, D.C. and H.H. Yap, eds. 1997. Chemical Methods for the Control of
Vectors and Pests of Public Health Importance. Geneva, Switzerland: World
Health Organization.
Dockrill, Paul and Frank Friedrich. 2001. Boilers and Heaters: Improving Energy
Efficiency. NRCAN.
http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/publications/infosource/pub/cipec/boilersheaters.pdf
Air and Waste Management Association (AWMA). 2000. Air Pollution Engineering
Manual, Second Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. New York, NY.
ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists). 2005.
Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances in the Work Environment.
Cincinnati:ACGIH.
ANSI (American National Standards Institute). Homepage. http://www.ansi.org/
(accessed May 19, 2006).
ADB. 2003. Road Safety Audit for Road Projects: An Operational Tool. Asian
Development Bank, Manila.
96
NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). Center for Disease
Control and Prevention Department of Health and Human Services.
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/homepage.html (accessed May 18, 2006)
OECD. 1999. Safety Strategies for Rural Roads. Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development, Paris. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/2/2351720.pdf
National Research Council of Canada, 2005. Building Codes. http://www.nrccnrc.gc.ca/doingbusiness/codes_e.html (accessed May 18, 2006).
NRCAN (Natural Resources Canada). Electric Motors Factsheet 6. Office of
Energy Efficiency.
http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/regulations/html/Factsheet6.cfm?text=N&printview=N
(accessed May 18, 2006)
NRCAN. Energy-Efficient Motor Systems Assessment Guide. Office of Energy
Efficiency.
http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/cipec/ieep/newscentre/motor_system/introduction.cfm?text=
N&printview=N (accessed May 18, 2006)
NRCAN (Natural Resources Canada). EnerGuide Program. Office of Energy
Efficiency.
http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/equipment/english/index.cfm?PrintView=N&Text=N
(accessed March 24, 2006)
97
PTCL (Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Lab). Safety (MSDS) data for
benzo(a)pyrene. http://www.physchem.ox.ac.uk/MSDS/BE/benzo(a)pyrene.html
(accessed May 18, 2006)
Prokop, Gundula. 2002. Second Technical Workshop on Contaminated Sites Workshop Proceedings and Follow-up. European Environment Agency.
http://reports.eea.europa.eu/technical_report_2002_76/en/Tech76.pdf
Rushbrook, P. and M. Pugh. 1998. Solid Waste Landfills in Middle- and LowerIncome Countries: A Technical Guide to Planning, Design, and Operation. World
Bank. http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2002/12/06/0000
94946_02112104104987/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf
US DOE. 2005. Improve Motor System Efficiency for a Broader Range of Motors
with MotorMaster+ International. Industrial Technologies Program.
http://eereweb.ee.doe.gov/industry/bestpractices/pdfs/mmplus_international.pdf
Tsunokawa, Koji and Christopher Hoban, eds. 1997. Roads and the
Environment: A Handbook. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
http://www.worldbank.org/transport/publicat/reh/toc.htm
98
WHO. 2003. Draft Guidelines for the Management of Public Health Pesticides.
Communicable Disease Control, Prevention and Eradication, World Health
Organization. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2003/WHO_CDS_WHOPES_2003.7.pdf
WHO Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater. Volume
2: Wastewater Use in Agriculture
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/wastewater/gsuweg2/en/index.html
WHO. 2005. Guidelines for drinking-water quality.
http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/gdwq3/en/ (accessed May 18,
2006)
Woolliams, J. 2002. Planning, Design and Construction Strategies for Green
Buildings. Eco-City Planning Company.
http://www.greenbuildingsbc.com/new_buildings/pdf_files/greenbuild_strategies_g
uide.pdf
Yassi, A. et al. 1998. Basic Environmental Health. WHO/EHG/98.19. Office of
Global and Integrated Environmental Health, World Health Organization, Geneva.
Zaim, M. 2002. Global Insecticide Use for Vector-Borne Disease Control.
WHO/CDS/WHOPES/GCDPP/2002.2. Communicable Disease Control,
Prevention and Eradication, World Health Organization.
99