Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
180
Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP Document 180 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 3
1 PARKER C. FOLSE III (WA Bar No. 24895 – Pro Hac Vice)
pfolse@susmangodfrey.com
2 IAN B. CROSBY (WA Bar No. 28461 – Pro Hac Vice)
icrosby@susmangodfrey.com
3 FLOYD G. SHORT (WA Bar No. 21632 – Pro Hac Vice)
fshort@susmangodfrey.com
4 SUSMAN GODFREY, L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
5 Seattle, Washington 98101-3000
(206) 516-3880 Tel.
6 (206) 516-3883 Fax
25 DATE/DEADLINE EVENT
October 16, 2007 Disclosure of expert witnesses, service of reports,
26 and production of documents regarding expert
testimony in response to disclosures regarding
27 burden-of-proof experts (FRCP 26(a)(2))
October 29, 2007 Deadline for filing dispositive motions
28 November 19, 2007 Due date for responses to dispositive motions
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME CASE NO. C-06-00019 MHP
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP Document 180 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 2 of 3
1 November 30, 2007 Due date for reply briefs in support of dispositive
motions
2 December 7, 2007 Deadline by which all experts must be produced
for deposition
3 December 7, 2007 Deadline for completing all expert discovery
4
The extension of time is requested to allow Burst additional time to fully respond to Dr. Wicker’s
5
report on invalidity, for the convenience of the experts and attorneys in scheduling expert
6
depositions, and to allow adequate time for briefing dispositive motions thereafter. Time has been
7
extended for Burst to respond to Apple’s Complaint for Declaratory Judgment; to continue the case
8
management conference set for April 3, 2006, to May 8, 2006; for Apple to respond to Burst’s
9
Amended Answer and Counterclaim; for Burst to respond to Apple’s Motions for Summary
10
Judgment of Non-Infringement and of Invalidity Based on Kramer and AT&T Patents; to revise the
11
Scheduling Order; to reset hearings on Apple’s First and Second Motions for Summary Judgment;
12
for Apple’s Reply to Burst’s Opposition to Apple’s Second Motion for Summary Judgment; and for
13
Burst to file its answer to Apple’s Amended Answer to Burst’s Amended Counterclaim and
14
Counterclaim for Declaratory Judgment. The requested time modifications will have no effect on
15
the remaining schedule of the case.
16
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME 2 CASE NO. C-06-00019 MHP
Case 3:06-cv-00019-MHP Document 180 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 3 of 3
26
Marilyn Hall Patel, United States District Judge
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME 3 CASE NO. C-06-00019 MHP