Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph
Abstract
This study investigates and demonstrates the state of the art in remote sensing techniques for detailed landslide hazard
assessment applicable to large areas. Since the most common methods of landslide hazard assessment using simple inventories and
weighted overlays are heavily dependent on three-dimensional terrain visualization and analysis, stereo satellite images from the
IKONOS Very High Resolution (VHR) sensor are used for this study. The DEMs created from IKONOS stereo images appear to be
much more accurate and sensitive to micro-scale terrain features than a DEM created from digital contour data with a 2 m contour
interval. Pan-sharpened stereo IKONOS images permit interpretation of recent landslides as small as 23 m in width as well as
relict landslides older than 50 years. A costbenefit analysis comparing stereo air photo interpretation with stereo satellite image
interpretation suggests that stereo satellite imagery is usually more cost-effective for detailed landslide hazard assessment over
large areas.
D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Landslide; IKONOS; DEM; Stereo model; Hong Kong
1. Introduction
Techniques for landslide hazard assessment generally
require the collection of highly detailed information
over large areas. Soeters and Cornelis (1996) defined
four scales of slope instability assessment for landslide
hazard: national, regional, medium and local. At the
local level, only a few tens of square kilometers can
be studied, and areas as small as 1 ha or less should be
clearly defined. However, our experience in Hong Kong
indicates that even such local-scale surveys give only an
over-generalized ground situation, and that observation
and mapped units need to be at a micro-scale between 10
m and a few centimeters. This is because the majority of
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: lsjanet@polyu.edu.hk (J.E. Nichol).
0169-555X/$ - see front matter D 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.10.001
69
Table 1
Traditional methods for landslide hazard assessment
Assessment method
Data required
Minimum resolution
required
3-D (stereo)
required
Area covered/scale of
measurement
1. Direct observation of
ground movement
2. Heuristic (weighted overlays)
10 cm
10 cm
20 m
no
no
yes
10 m
yes
sub-meter
sub-meter
medium to regional scales
where detailed data are
unavailable N1000 km2
local to medium scales
1001000 km2
70
71
Fig. 2. Shaded relief models of DEMs generated from IKONOS stereo images. (A) whole study area (24 km2) with cell size of 5 m, (B) specific area
of interest (1.14 km2) with cell size of 1 m. Box in (B) shows location of Fig. 3.
72
appropriate GCPs and there was almost no improvement in the accuracy by adding more GCPs. The accuracy of the RPC-based model applied to the IKONOS
stereo images in our study is slightly lower than that of
previous similar research by Fraser et al. (2002) and
Toutin (2004). The main reason for this may be much
greater relative relief and ruggedness in our study area.
Assessment of the IKONOS 5 m DEM at 42 checkpoints using the DEM from the air photos as reference
shows that most of the points have height errors between 1.50 and 2.5 m, but a few steeply sloping areas
have larger errors up to 5.0 m. The total RMS error and
the linear error with a 79% level of confidence (LE79)
of the 5 m DEM were 4.13 and 5.0 m, respectively.
The mean height difference between the measurement on the IKONOS anaglyph and that on the air-photo
anaglyph was ca. 1.0 m along the longitudinal section
(Fig 4A) and less than 0.5 m along the cross section
Fig. 4. Comparison of elevations (m) obtained at statios along and across landslide trail among IKONOS anaglyph, IKONOS 1 m DEM, existing
DEM from 2 m contour maps, and anaglyph from high-resolution air photos. (A) Points 114 along longitudinal section; (B) Points C1C4 along
cross section. See Fig. 3 for their locations.
73
74
Fig. 7. Stereogram from Pan-sharpened IKONOS stereo imagery, for 3D viewing using stereoscope.
Table 2
Relative costs ($US) of data acquisition and processing for landslide survey in 1000 km2 area based on stereo images
Pan-sharpened IKONOS
Pan-sharpened SPOT 5
ASTER
400
0.2 (63 lppm)
32
1
1
2.55.0
46,000c
48 / 960
48 / 960
40 / 800
48,720
52,720 (+4000g)
4
2.5
7.5
6.5 (Toutin, 2004)
9000
6 / 120
6 / 120
20 / 400
9640
2
15
45
30 (Eckert, 2005)
120
6 / 120
6 / 120
10 / 200
560
0.61.0
11,000 (20 per print)
960 / 19,200
30,200
56,100 (+25,900f)
Air photo study assumes manual, not digital, processing and interpretation.
Commonly three times pixel size.
Cost of IKONOS images varies by country/continent: price quoted is USA price.
Time in hours is costed at US $20 per hour.
Assuming no ground truth is required; if required, add four days for 32 GCPs.
Aircraft four days: $25,900.
Tasking of IKONOS stereo: $4000.
75
Liu, J.G., Mason, P.J., Clerici, N., Davis, A., Miao, F., Deng, H.,
Liang, L., 2004. Landslide hazard assessment in the Three Gorges
area of the Yangtze River using ASTER imagery: Zigui amd
Badong. Geomorphology 61, 171 187.
Malamud, B.D., Turcotte, D.L., Guzzetti, F., Reichenback, P., 2004.
Landslide inventories and their statistical properties. Earth Surface
Processes and Landforms 29, 687 711.
Mantovani, F., Soeters, R., Van Westen, C.J., 1996. Remote sensing
techniques for landslide studies and hazard zonation in Europe.
Geomorphology 15, 213 225.
McCalpin, J., 1974. Preliminary age classification of landslides for
inventory mapping: 21st Annual Symposium on Engineering
Geology and Soils Engineering. Proceedings, University of
Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USA, pp. 99 111.
Nichol, J.E., Wong, M.S., 2005. Satellite remote sensing for detailed
landslide inventories using change detection and image fusion.
International Journal of Remote Sensing 26, 1913 1926.
Odajima, T., Tsuchida, S., Yamaguchi, Y., Kamai, T., Siagian, Y.O.P.,
1998. GIS and remote sensing based analysis of landslide hazards
in Cianjur, West Java, Indonesia. Proceedings of International
Symposium on Application of Remote Sensing and Geographic
Information System to Disaster Reduction (ITIT International
Symposium), 3-4 March 1998, pp. 185 190.
Philipson, W.R., 1997. Manual of Photographic Interpretation,
second edition. ASPRS Science and Engineering Series. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,
Bethesda, Md.
Shaker, A., Shi, W.Z., 2003. Polynomial models as a tool for mapping
high resolution satellite imagery. Proceedings of Remote Sensing
for Environment Monitoring, GIS Applications, and Geology III,
European Remote Sensing Conference. SPIE (The International
Society for Optical Engineering), Barcelona, Spain, pp. 224 233.
Shi, W.Z, Shaker, A., 2003. Analysis of terrain elevation effects on
IKONOS imagery rectification accuracy by using non-rigorous
models. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69,
1359 1366.
Soeters, A., Cornelis, J.W., 1996. Slope instability recognition, analysis and zonation. In: Schuster, R.L., Turner, A.K. (Eds.), Landslides Investigation and Mitigation. Transportation Research
Board, Special Report 247. National Academy Press, Washington
DC, pp. 129 177.
Toutin, T., 2003. Error tracking in IKONOS geometric processing
using a 3D parametric model. Photogrammetric Engineering and
Remote Sensing 69, 43 51.
Toutin, T., 2004. Comparison of stereo-extracted DTM from different
high-resolution sensors: SPOT-5, EROS-A, IKONOS-II, and
QuickBird. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 42, 2121 2129.
Zhang, Y., 2002. Problems in the fusion of commercial high-resolution satellite as well as Landsat 7 images and initial solutions.
Proceedings of Symposium on Geospatial Theory, Processing and
Applications, ISPRS, Ottawa, Canada, On CD ROM.