Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
questions
variation.
Different types of research will have different ways of
presenting the data.
For example, a thesis in oral history and one in marketing
may both use interview data that has been collected and
analysed in similar ways, but the way the results of this
analysis are presented will be very different because the
questions they are trying to answer are different. The
presentation of results from experimental studies will be
different again.
Function
Organisation of data
Presented in the order of the research questions and
hypotheses
For each RQ or H
Statistical test used
Results of the test
Significance level of the test
Description connecting statistical results to support for or rejection
of H or to answer RQ
4/15/14
Type B
Results & Discussion
Topic 1 Results
Topic 1 Discussion
Results & Discussion
Topic 2 Results
Topic 2 Discussion
Results & Discussion
Topic 3 Results
Topic 3 Discussion
headings
Report notes that qualify, explain, or provide additional information
7.10
their relationships
Labeled with a clear title that includes the number of the figure
Augment rather than duplicate the text
Convey only essential facts
Omit visually distracting detail
John W. Creswell
Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and
Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research,
third edition
John W. Creswell
Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating
Quantitative and Qualitative Research, third edition
John W. Creswell
Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and
Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, third
edition
bottom.
Figure legends go below the figure; figures are usually viewed
4/15/14
Style
example 1
objectively.
The passive voice will likely dominate here, but use the
example 2
In contrast, this example strays subtly into interpretation
example 3
Figure 1 shows the proportion of male and female students in their
choice of service provider according to the factors of better coverage,
customer service, lower rates and popularity of brand names.
There are differences and similarities in the selection of the features of
service provider by both male and female students of Permata
University. The biggest difference between the two genders were in the
selection of lower rate and popularity of the service provider. In the
selection of lower rate, male students made up 48 percent of the
respondents. On the contrary, the percentage of female students who
selected lower rate was just 10 percent. However the trend was the
reverse when it comes to the factor of popular brand name product.
Here, male students chose popularity of service provider with 10
percent, whereas female students put more value on popularity of
service provider with 35 percent. For the other feature, female students
regarded better coverage as more important, with a percentage of 30
percent. In contrast, only 17 percent of males selected this feature. The
only feature of the service provider that had similar percentage by both
genders was the customer service. Here, the percentage of male and
female students who selected customer service was 25 percent.
Summary
Time is short
4/15/14
Adapted from:
http://www.ldeo.columbia.edu/~martins/sen_sem/
thesis_org.html
http://online.physics.uiuc.edu/courses/phys499/
msucohort16.wikispaces.com/file/view/
3eChapter7+revised_edit.ppt
highered.mcgraw-hill.com/.../Chapter_17....
http://abacus.bates.edu/~ganderso/biology/resources/
writing/HTWsections.html#results