0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
142 vues19 pages
This document discusses the relationship between systematic theology and historical theology. It argues that while history is important for understanding Scripture and applying it, some theologies have replaced biblical authority with an autonomous historical method. It analyzes approaches from Ritschl, the History of Religions School, Barth, and others that failed to properly locate history in relation to revelation. While history is necessary, Scripture must remain the ultimate standard. The document seeks to reiterate the Reformation doctrine of sola Scriptura and apply it to theological methodology, emphasizing Scripture over autonomous concepts of history.
This document discusses the relationship between systematic theology and historical theology. It argues that while history is important for understanding Scripture and applying it, some theo…