Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Information to trace:
Supplier SAP-Number:
Part number:
Supplier DUNS-Number:
Expedition date:
Delivery note:
Production date:
Date:
Batch-number:
Description /
What to be checked ?
Traceability requirements
Not Acceptable
1. The Supplier is responsible for the traceability Defined accuracy of containment: marking of single parts
and proper marking of the product during all
(serial traceability) or batch traceability on container
phases of production and delivery.
base, per shift, week, day etc.
The traceability must be assured for all
components.
4. Where parts/materials submitted or provided Benteler's identification submitted to the supplier . How
by Benteler are to be machined or processed,
the identification of the parts / material match with
the supplier must guarantee that his products
Benteler's identifications after processing.
can be traced back to the specific delivery note /
batch or serial numbers submitted by Benteler.
6. Is it guarranteed the traceability for parts going To check the supplier's procedure about the
out for additional process (e.g. subcontrated
management of product going out for additional
processes like washing, coating, paintig, plating) processes. The material flow chart could help to identify
the places where the material goes out and return to the
intern process flow.
7. Does the supplier use labels according to the
Benteler regional specification?
Result
Yes
No
This excel-sheet generates all report pages for the process audit
according to VDA 6.3
Date, audited unit, audited process, auditor and report no. can only
be inputted in the questionnaire, they are generated automatically in
all other sheets.
[Yellow highlighted fields have to be filled manually!!!]
The product-oriented grouping of single process steps to "product
groups" can be done in the "Summary of questions". This has to be
evaluated manually.
The evaluation of the questions must be filled in the questionnaire.
The first page and the action plan can be filled by additional contents.
na = not assessed, not applicable
Auditors
Audited process / product / service
Audit Date
Reason for the audit
Degree of conformity
Yes
No
Distributor
1.2
1.3
Are the resources for the realization of the product development planned?
1.4
1.5
1.6
Are the necessary personnel and technical conditions for the project process planned/available?
2
2.1
2.2
Is the design FMEA updated in the project process and are the established measures realized?
2.3
2.4
2.5
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
Are the necessary personnel and technical preconditions for the project process planned/available?
3.6
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
Are the required releases / qualification records available at the respective times?
4.4
Is a pre-production carried out under serial conditions for the serial release?
4.5
4.6
Value
Notice
Questionnaire page 4 of 14
Audited Company:
Report no.:
Auditor(s):
Date:
No. Question
B
5
5.1
Serial Production
Suppliers/ Input Material
Are only approved quality capable suppliers used?
5.2
5.3
Is the quality performance evaluated and are corrective actions introduced when there are deviations from
the requirements?
5.4
Are target agreements for continual improvement of products and process made and implemented with the
suppliers?
5.5
Are the required releases for the supplied serial products available and the required improvement
measures implemented?
5.6
Are the procedures agreed with the customer, regarding customer-supplied products, maintained?
5.7
5.8
Are input material/internal residues delivered and stored according to their purpose?
5.9
Production
Process step 1
Process step 2
Process step 3
Process step 4
Process step 5
6.1 Personnel / Qualification
6.1.1 Are the employees given responsibility and monitoring the product/process quality?
Value
Notice
6.1.2 Are the employees given responsibility and authority for production equipment and environment?
6.1.3 Are the employees suitable to perform the required tasks and is their qualification maintained?
6.2.2 Can the quality requirements be monitored effective during serial production with the implemented
inspection, measuring and test equipment?
6.2.3 Are the work and inspection stations appropriate to the needs?
6.2.4 Are the relevant details in the production and inspection documents complete and maintained?
6.2.6 Is an approval for production starts issued and are adjustment details, as well as deviations recorded?
6.2.7 Are the required corrective actions carried out on schedule and checked for effectiveness?
Questionnaire page 5 of 14
Audited Company:
Report no.:
Auditor(s):
Date:
No. Question
Value
Notice
6.3.4 Is the material and parts flow secured against mix ups/ exchanges by mistake and traceability guaranteed?
6.3.5 Are tools, equipment and inspection, measuring and test equipment stored correctly?
6.4.2 Are the quality und process data statistically analysed and are improvement program derived from this?
6.4.3 Are the causes of product and process nonconformities analysed and the corrective actions checked for
their effectiveness?
6.4.4 Are processes and products regularly audited?
6.4.6 Are target parameters available for product und process and is their compliance monitored?
Production
Process step 6
Process step 7
Process step 8
Process step 9
Process step 10
6.1 Personnel/ Qualification
6.1.1 Are the employees given responsibility and monitoring the product/process quality?
10
6.1.2 Are the employees given responsibility and authority for production equipment and environment?
6.1.3 Are the employees suitable to perform the required tasks and is their qualification maintained?
6.2.2 Can the quality requirements be monitored effective during serial production with the implemented
inspection, measuring and test equipment?
6.2.3 Are the work and inspection stations appropriate to the needs?
6.2.4 Are the relevant details in the production and inspection documents complete and maintained?
6.2.6 Is an approval for production starts issued and are adjustment details, as well as deviations recorded?
6.2.7 Are the required corrective actions carried out on schedule and checked for effectiveness?
Questionnaire page 6 of 14
Audited Company:
Report no.:
Auditor(s):
Date:
No. Question
Value
Notice
6.3.4 Is the material and parts flow secured against mix ups/ exchanges by mistake and traceability guaranteed?
6.3.5 Are tools, equipment and inspection, measuring and test equipment stored correctly?
6.4.2 Are the quality und process data statistically analysed and are improvement program derived from this?
6.4.3 Are the causes of product and process nonconformities analysed and the corrective actions checked for
their effectiveness?
6.4.4 Are processes and products regularly audited?
6.4.6 Are target parameters available for product und process and is their compliance monitored?
7
7.1
7.2
7.3
Are fault analyses carried out when there are deviations from the quality requirements and are
improvement measures implemented?
7.4
Are fault analysis carried out when there are deviations from the quality requirements and are
improvement measures implemented?
7.5
Questionnaire page 7 of 14
Auditierter Bereich
Auditierter
Prozess
date / Datum:
date / Datum:
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
6.1.1
6.1.2
6.1.3
6.1.4
6.1.5
6.2.1
6.2.2
6.2.3
6.2.4
6.2.5
6.2.6
6.2.7
6.3.1
6.3.2
6.3.3
6.3.4
6.3.5
6.4.1
6.4.2
6.4.3
6.4.4
6.4.5
6.4.6
6.1.1
6.1.2
6.1.3
6.1.4
6.1.5
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
target date /
Termin
100%
Class / Bew.
75%
Notice / Feststellung
50%
25%
progress / status
Resposibility /
Verantwortung
(Name)
actual completion
date
6.2.1
6.2.2
6.2.3
6.2.4
6.2.5
6.2.6
6.2.7
6.3.1
6.3.2
6.3.3
6.3.4
6.3.5
6.4.1
6.4.2
6.4.3
6.4.4
6.4.5
6.4.6
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.5
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no findings
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
no actions necessary
comment / Bemerkung
Audited process
Date
Auditor
.2
1 Planning
b) Process development
.1
3 Planning
.2
.3
.3
.4
.4
.5
.5
.6
.1
2 Realization
.6
.1
4 Realization
.2
.2
.3
.3
.4
.4
.5
.5
EDE
na
EPE
na
EZ
na
.6
Serial Production
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.8
.9
.2
.3
.4
.5
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
.7
.2
.3
.4
.5
.1
.2
.3
.4
.5
.6
Process step 1
E1
na
E2
na
E3
na
E4
na
E5
na
E6
na
E7
na
E8
na
E9
na
E10
na
EPG
na
EK
na
Process step 2
Process step 3
Process step 4
Process step 5
Process step 6
Process step 7
Process step 8
Process step 9
Process step 10
Assessment of the sub-elements with quality system reference Element B6 (Mean value Steps 1-n)
na
na
na
EU1 (%)
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
EU2(%)
na
na
na
na
na
EU3(%)
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
EU4(%)
.1 .2
.3
.4
.5
na
na
E P=
E DE + E PE+ EZ +E PG +E K
No . of evaluated elements
Audited process:
Date:
Auditor:
Conformity
%
EDE
na
EPE
na
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
80
90
100
B Serial production
Evaluation elements
Suppliers / Input material
Customer services / satisfaction
Conformity
%
EZ
na
EK
na
E1
na
E2
na
E3
na
E4
na
E5
na
E6
na
E7
na
E8
na
E9
na
E10
na
EPG
na
Evaluation of the sub-elements with quality system reference (Mean value Process steps 1-n)
Sub-elements
Personnel / Qualification
Production material / equipment
Transport / parts handling / Storage
Fault analysis, corrections, CIP
Conformity
%
EU1
na
EU2
na
EU3
na
EU4
na
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Points
10
8
Comments
No comments