Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Stress (mechanics)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[show]Laws
[show]Solid mechanics
[show]Fluid mechanics
[show]Scientists
This box: view talk edit
In general, however, the stress is not uniformly distributed over a cross section of a material
body, and consequently the stress at a point on a given area is different than the average stress
over the entire area. Therefore, it is necessary to define the stress not at a given area but at a
specific point in the body (Figure 1.1). According to Cauchy, the stress at any point in an object,
of a second order
The Cauchy stress tensor obeys the tensor transformation law under a change in the system of
coordinates. A graphical representation of this transformation law is the Mohr's circle for stress.
The Cauchy stress tensor is used for stress analysis of material bodies experiencing small
deformations. For large deformations, also called finite deformations, other measures of stress
are required, such as the first and second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensors, the Biot stress tensor,
and the Kirchhoff stress tensor.
According to the principle of conservation of linear momentum, if the continuum body is in
static equilibrium it can be demonstrated that the components of the Cauchy stress tensor in
every material point in the body satisfy the equilibrium equations (Cauchy's equations of motion
for zero acceleration). At the same time, according to the principle of conservation of angular
momentum, equilibrium requires that the summation of moments with respect to an arbitrary
point is zero, which leads to the conclusion that the stress tensor is symmetric, thus having only
six independent stress components, instead of the original nine.
There are certain invariants associated with the stress tensor, whose values do not depend upon
the coordinate system chosen, or the area element upon which the stress tensor operates. These
are the three eigenvalues of the stress tensor, which are called the principal stresses.
The determination of the internal distribution of stresses, i.e., stress analysis, is required in
engineering, e.g., civil engineering and mechanical engineering, for the study and design of
structures, e.g., tunnels, dams, mechanical parts, and structural frames among others, under
prescribed or expected loads. To determine the distribution of stress in the structure it is
necessary to solve a boundary-value problem by specifying the boundary conditions, i.e.
displacements and/or forces on the boundary. Constitutive equations, such as Hooke's Law for
linear elastic materials, are used to describe the stress:strain relationship in these calculations. A
boundary-value problem based on the theory of elasticity is applied to structures expected to
deform elastically, i.e. infinitesimal strains, under design loads. When the loads applied to the
structure induce plastic deformations, the theory of plasticity is implemented.
Approximate solutions for boundary-value problems can be obtained through the use numerical
methods such as the Finite Element Method, the Finite Difference Method, and the Boundary
Element Method, which are implemented in computer programs. Analytical or close-form
solutions can be obtained for simple geometries, constitutive relations, and boundary conditions.
The stress analysis can be simplified in cases where the physical dimensions and the distribution
of loads allows the structure to be assumed as one-dimensional or two-dimensional. For a twodimensional analysis a plane stress or a plane strain condition can be assumed.
Alternatively, experimental determination of stresses can be carried out using the photoelastic
method.
In design of structures, calculated stresses are restricted to be less than an specified allowable
stress, also known as working or designed stress, that is chosen as some fraction of the yield
strength or of the ultimate strength of the material which the structure is made of. The ratio of the
ultimate stress to the allowable stress is defines as the factor of safety. Laboratory tests are
usually performed on material samples in order to determine the yield strength and the ultimate
strength that the material can withstand before failure.
Solids, liquids, and gases have stress fields. Static fluids support normal stress but will flow
under shear stress. Moving viscous fluids can support shear stress (dynamic pressure). Solids can
support both shear and normal stress, with ductile materials failing under shear and brittle
materials failing under normal stress. All materials have temperature dependent variations in
stress related properties, and non-Newtonian materials have rate-dependent variations.
Contents
[hide]
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
1 Definition of stress
o 1.1 Stress in a prismatic bar
2 Cauchy's stress principle
o 2.1 Relationship stress vector - stress tensor
o 2.2 Transformation rule of the stress tensor
o 2.3 Normal and shear stresses
3 Equilibrium equations and symmetry of the stress tensor
4 Principal stresses and stress invariants
5 Maximum and minimum shear stress
6 Stress deviator tensor
o 6.1 Invariants of the stress deviator tensor
7 Octahedral stresses
8 Analysis of stress
o 8.1 Uniaxial stress
o 8.2 Plane stress
o 8.3 Plane strain
9 Stress transformation in plane stress and plane strain
10 Mohr's circle for stress
o 10.1 Mohr's circle for plane stress or plane strain
o 10.2 Mohr's circle for a general three-dimensional state of stresses
11 Alternative measures of stress
o 11.1 Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor
x
x
12 See also
13 References
Figure 1.3. Normal stress in a prismatic bar. The stress or force distribution in the cross section
of the bar is not necessarily uniform. However, an average normal stress
can be used
Figure 1.4. Shear stress in a prismatic bar. The stress or force distribution in the cross section of
the bar is not necessarily uniform. However, an average shear stress
is not a good
approximation.
Let's first examine the simple case of a prismatic bar subjected to an axial force
, which can
be producing either tension or compression (Figures 1.2 and 1.3). Considering a cross sectional
area perpendicular to the axis of the bar, we can find from equilibrium of forces that the resultant
normal force is equal to
. The intensity of internal forces, or stress , in the cross sectional
area can then be obtained by dividing the total normal force
, e.g. tensile force if acting
outward to the plane or compressive force if acting inward to the plane, by the cross-sectional
area where it is acting upon. In this case the stress is a scalar quantity called engineering or
nominal stress that represents an average stress (
) over the area, i.e. the stress in the cross
section is uniformly distributed. Thus, we have
obtain the shear stress. In this case the shear stress is a scalar quantity representing an average
shear stress (
) in the section, i.e. the stress in the cross section is uniformly distributed.
In general, however, the stress is not uniformly distributed over the cross section of a material
body, and consequently the stress at a point on a given area is different from the average stress
over the entire area. In Figure 1.3, the normal stress is observed in two planes
and
of the axially loaded prismatic bar. The stress on plane
, which is closer to the
point of application of the load , varies more across the cross section than that of plane
. However, if the cross sectional area of the bar is very small, e.g. a slender bar, the
variation of stress across the area is small and the normal stress can be approximated by
.
On the other hand, the variation of shear stress across the section of a prismatic bar cannot be
assumed uniform.
Therefore, it is necessary to define the stress at a specific point in the surface.
becomes
traction vector
at point
This equation means that the stress vector depends on the location in the body and the orientation
of the plane on which it is acting.
By Newton's third law of motion, the stress vectors acting on opposite sides of the same surface
are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. Thus,
The state of stress at a point in the body is then defined by all the stress vectors
associated with all planes (infinite number of planes) that pass through that point. However,
according to Cauchy's fundamental theorem, by just knowing the stress vectors on three mutually
perpendicular planes, the stress vector on any other plane passing through that point can be found
through coordinate transformation equations.
Depending on the orientation of the plane under consideration, the stress vector may not
necessarily be perpendicular to that plane, and can be resolved into two components:
x
where
x
and the other parallel to this plane, called the shearing stress
where
is the tangential component of the force
to the differential surface area
shear stress can be further decomposed into two mutually perpendicular vectors.
. The
where
,
, and
, and
The first index indicates that the stress acts on a plane normal to the axis, and the second
index denotes the direction in which the stress acts. A stress component is positive if it acts in
the positive direction of the coordinate axes, and if the plane where it acts has an outward normal
vector pointing in the positive coordinate direction.
The Voigt notation representation of the Cauchy stress tensor takes advantage of the symmetry
of the stress tensor to express the stress as a 6-dimensional vector of the form
The Voigt notation is used extensively in representing stress-strain relations in solid mechanics
and for computational efficiency in numerical structural mechanics software.
To prove the expression, we consider a tetrahedron with three faces oriented in the coordinate
planes, and with an infinitesimal area
oriented in an arbitrary direction specified by a normal
vector (Figure 2.3). The stress vector on this plane is denoted by
. The stress vectors
acting on the faces of the tetrahedron are denoted as
,
, and
, and are by
definition the components of the stress tensor
. This tetrahedron is sometimes called the
Cauchy tetrahedron. From equilibrium of forces, i.e. Newton's second law, we have
and
Here
, is proportional to the square of the linear dimension of the tetrahedron and
to
the third power. Thus, in the limit when the tetrahedron shrinks to a point, the RHS of the above
equation approaches zero and,
or, equivalently,
This equation expresses the components of the stress vector acting on an arbitrary plane with
normal vector at a given point in terms of the components of the stress tensor,
, at that
point.
system to an
components
in the initial system are transformed into the components
according to the tensor transformation rule (Figure 2.4):
where
system, the
in the new system
The magnitude of the shear stress component, , acting in the plane formed by the two vectors
and , can then be found using the Pythagorean theorem, thus
where
At the same time, equilibrium requires that the summation of moments with respect to an
arbitrary point is zero, which leads to the conclusion that the stress tensor is symmetric, i.e.
However, in the presence of couple-stresses, i.e. moments per unit volume, the stress tensor is
non-symmetric. This also is the case when the Knudsen number is close to one,
, or
the continuum is a Non-Newtonian fluid, which can lead to rotationally non-invariant fluids,
such as polymers.
where
,
, and
, are the principal stresses. These principal stresses may be combined to
form three other commonly used invariants, , , and , which are the first, second and third
stress invariants, respectively. The first and third invariant are the trace and determinant
respectively, of the stress tensor. Thus, we have
Because of its simplicity, working and thinking in the principal coordinate system is often very
useful when considering the state of the elastic medium at a particular point.
[show]Derivation of principal stresses and stress invariants
1. a mean hydrostatic stress tensor or volumetric stress tensor or mean normal stress
tensor,
, which tends to change the volume of the stressed body; and
2. a deviatoric component called the stress deviator tensor,
, which tends to distort it.
where
The deviatoric stress tensor can be obtained by subtracting the hydrostatic stress tensor from the
stress tensor:
where ,
and
are the first, second, and third deviatoric stress invariants, respectively.
Their values are the same (invariant) regardless of the orientation of the coordinate system
chosen. These deviatoric stress invariants can be expressed as a function of the components of
or its principal values , , and , or alternatively, as a function of
or its principal
values
,
, and
. Thus,
Because
A quantity called the equivalent stress or von Mises stress is commonly used in solid mechanics.
The equivalent stress is defined as
Considering the principal directions as the coordinate axes, a plane whose normal vector makes
equal angles with each of the principal axes (i.e. having direction cosines equal to
) is
called an octahedral plane. There are a total of eight octahedral planes (Figure 6). The normal
and shear components of the stress tensor on these planes are called octahedral normal stress
and octahedral shear stress
, respectively.
Knowing that the stress tensor of point O (Figure 6) in the principal axes is
The normal component of the stress vector at point O associated with the octahedral plane is
which is the mean normal stress or hydrostatic stress. This value is the same in all eight
octahedral planes. The shear stress on the octahedral plane is then
mechanical engineering, for the study and design of structures, e.g., tunnels, dams, mechanical
parts, and structural frames among others, under prescribed or expected loads.
To determine the distribution of stress in the structure it is necessary to solve a boundary-value
problem by specifying the boundary conditions, i.e. displacements and/or forces on the
boundary. Constitutive equations, such as e.g. Hooke's Law for linear elastic materials, are used
to describe the stress:strain relationship in these calculations. A boundary-value problem based
on the theory of elasticity is applied to structures expected to deform elastically, i.e. infinitesimal
strains, under design loads. When the loads applied to the structure induce plastic deformations,
the theory of plasticity is implemented.
Approximate solutions for boundary-value problems can be obtained through the use numerical
methods such as the Finite Element Method, the Finite Difference Method, and the Boundary
Element Method, which are implemented in computer programs. Analytical or close-form
solutions can be obtained for simple geometries, constitutive relations, and boundary conditions.
Alternatively, experimental determination of stresses can be carried out using the photoelastic
method.
In design of structures, calculated stresses are restricted to be less than an specified allowable
stress, also known as working or designed stress, that is chosen as some fraction of the yield
strength or of the ultimate strength of the material which the structure is made of. The ratio of the
ultimate stress to the allowable stress is defined as the factor of safety. Laboratory test are
usually performed on material samples in order to determine the yield strength and the ultimate
strength that the material can withstand before failure.
All real objects occupy a three-dimensional space. The stress analysis can be simplified in cases
where the physical dimensions and the loading conditions allows the structure to be assumed as
one-dimensional or two-dimensional. For a two-dimensional analysis a plane stress or a plane
strain condition can be assumed.
must be calculated assuming the current cross-sectional area instead of the initial cross-sectional
area. This is termed true stress and is expressed as
,
where
is the nominal (engineering) strain, and
is nominal (engineering) stress.
The relationship between true strain and engineering strain is given by
.
In uniaxial tension, true stress is then greater than nominal stress. The converse holds in
compression.
two, i.e. the element is flat or thin. In this case, the stresses are negligible with respect to the
smaller dimension as they are not able to develop within the material and are small compared to
the in-plane stresses. Therefore, the face of the element is not acted by loads and the structural
element can be analyzed as two-dimensional, e.g. thin-walled structures such as plates subject to
in-plane loading or thin cylinders subject to pressure loading. The other three non-zero
components remain constant over the thickness of the plate. The stress tensor can then be
approximated by:
.
The corresponding strain tensor is:
components
and all other stress components equal to zero (Figure 7.1, Figure 8.1).
From static equilibrium of an infinitesimal material element at (Figure 8.2), the normal stress
and the shear stress on any plane perpendicular to the - plane passing through with a
unit vector making an angle of with the horizontal, i.e.
is the direction cosine in the
direction, is given by:
These equations indicate that in a plane stress or plane strain condition, one can determine the
stress components at a point on all directions, i.e. as a function of , if one knows the stress
components
on any two perpendicular directions at that point. It is important to
remember that we are considering a unit area of the infinitesimal element in the direction parallel
to the - plane.
Figure 8.1 - Stress transformation at a point in a continuum under plane stress conditions.
Figure 8.2 - Stress components at a plane passing through a point in a continuum under plane
stress conditions.
The principal directions (Figure 8.3), i.e. orientation of the planes where the shear stress
components are zero, can be obtained by making the previous equation for the shear stress
equal to zero. Thus we have:
and we obtain
which are
a maximum, i.e.
where
,
, then we
Figure 8.3 - Transformation of stresses in two dimensions, showing the planes of action of
principal stresses, and maximum and minimum shear stresses.
When
the infinitesimal element is oriented in the direction of the principal planes, thus
the stresses acting on the rectangular element are principal stresses:
and
.
Then the normal stress
and shear stress acting on a plane making an angle of with the
principal directions can be obtained by making
. Thus we have
occurs when
occurs when
, i.e.
, i.e.
(Figure 8.3):
(Figure 8.3):
on the circle are the normal stress and shear stress components, respectively, acting on a
particular cut plane with a unit vector with components
. In other words, the
circumference of the circle is the locus of points that represent state of stress on individual planes
at all their orientations.
Karl Culmann was the first to conceive a graphical representation for stresses while considering
longitudinal and vertical stresses in horizontal beams during bending. Mohr's contribution
extended the use of this representation for both two- and three-dimensional stresses and
developed a failure criterion based on the stress circle.
Figure 9.1. Mohr's circle for plane stress and plane strain conditions (double angle approach).
Figure 9.2. Mohr's circle for plane stress and plane strain conditions (Pole approach). Any
straight line drawn from the pole will intersect the Mohr circle at a point that represents the state
of stress on a plane inclined at the same orientation (parallel) in space as that line.
If we know the stress components
.
, and
at a point for any two perpendicular
planes in a continuum body under plane stress, or plane strain (Figures 8.1 and 8.2) we can
construct the Mohr circle of stress. Once the Mohr circle is drawn one can use it to find the stress
state on any other plane passing through that point in the body.
According to the sign convention for engineering mechanics, in disciplines such as mechanical
engineering and structural engineering, which is the one used in this article, for the construction
of the Mohr circle the normal stresses are positive if they are outward to the plane of action
(tension), and shear stresses are positive if they rotate clockwise about the point in consideration.
In geomechanics, i.e. soil mechanics and rock mechanics, however, normal stresses are
considered positive when they are inward to the plane of action (compression), and shear stresses
are positive if they rotate counterclockwise about the point in consideration.
To construct the Mohr circle of stress for a state of plane stress, or plane strain, first we plot two
points in the
space corresponding to the known stress components on both perpendicular
planes, i.e.
and
(Figure 9.1 and 9.2). We then connect points and
by a straight line and find the midpoint which corresponds to the intersection of this line
with the
axis. Finally, we draw a circle with diameter
and centre at .
As demonstrated in the previous section, the radius
of the circle is
The principal stresses are then the abscissa of the points of intersection of the circle with the
axis (note that the shear stresses are zero for the principal stresses).
Using the Mohr circle one can find the stress components
on any other plane with a
different orientation that passes through point . For this, two approaches can be used:
The first approach relies on the fact that the angle
half the angle between the lines joining their corresponding stress points
is
on the Mohr
circle and the centre of the circle (Figure 9.1). In other words, the stresses
acting on a
plane at an angle counterclockwise to the plane on which
acts is determined by traveling
counterclockwise around the circle from the known stress point
and angle
at the centre of the circle (Figure 9.1).
a distance subtending
The second approach involves the determination of a point on the Mohr circle called the pole or
the origin of planes. Any straight line drawn from the pole will intersect the Mohr circle at a
point that represents the state of stress on a plane inclined at the same orientation (parallel) in
space as that line. Therefore, knowing the stress components and on any particular plane, one
can draw a line parallel to that plane through the particular coordinates
and on the Mohr
circle and find the pole as the intersection of such line with the Mohr circle. As an example, let's
assume we have a state of stress with stress components
,
, and
, as shown on Figure
9.2. First, we can draw a line from point parallel to the plane of action of
, or, if we choose
otherwise, a line from point parallel to the plane of action of
. The intersection of any of
these two lines with the Mohr circle is the pole. Once the pole has been determined, to find the
state of stress on a plane making an angle with the vertical, or in other words a plane having its
normal vector forming an angle with the horizontal plane, then we can draw a line from the
pole parallel to that plane (See Figure 9.2). The normal and shear stresses on that plane are then
the coordinates of the point of intersection between the line and the Mohr circle.
must be
Considering the principal axes as the coordinate system, instead of the general
,
,
coordinate system, and assuming that
, then the normal and shear components
of the stress vector
, for a given plane with unit vector , satisfy the following equations
Knowing that
, which yields
Since
satisfy
, and
as the denominator
and
as the denominator
and
as the denominator
and
which are the equations of the three Mohr's circles for stress
,
coordinates
, and
,
, and
, with radii
, respectively.
These equations for the Mohr's circles show that all admissible stress points
lie on these
circles or within the shaded area enclosed by them (see Figure 7). Stress points
satisfying the equation for circle
. Stress points
satisfying
The Cauchy stress tensor is not the only measure of stress that is used in practice. Other
measures of stress include the first and second Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensors, the Biot stress
tensor, and the Kirchhoff stress tensor.
where
In terms of components with respect to an orthonormal basis, the first Piola-Kirchhoff stress is
given by
Because it relates different coordinate systems, the 1st Piola-Kirchhoff stress is a two-point
tensor. In general, it is not symmetric. The 1st Piola-Kirchhoff stress is the 3D generalization of
the 1D concept of engineering stress.
If the material rotates without a change in stress state (rigid rotation), the components of the 1st
Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor will vary with material orientation.
The 1st Piola-Kirchhoff stress is energy conjugate to the deformation gradient.
[edit] 2nd Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor
Whereas the 1st Piola-Kirchhoff stress relates forces in the current configuration to areas in the
reference configuration, the 2nd Piola-Kirchhoff stress tensor relates forces in the reference
configuration to areas in the reference configuration. The force in the reference configuration is
obtained via a mapping that preserves the relative relationship between the force direction and
the area normal in the current configuration.
Bending
Linear elasticity
Kelvin probe force microscope
Residual stress
Shot peening
Strain
Strain tensor
Stress-energy tensor
Stress-strain curve
Stress concentration
Virial stress
Von Mises stress
Yield stress
Yield surface
[edit] References
x
x
x
x
x
x
Dieter, G. E. (3 ed.). (1989). Mechanical Metallurgy. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 007-100406-8.
Love, A. E. H. (4 ed.). (1944). Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. New
York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-60174-9.
Marsden, J. E., & Hughes, T. J. R. (1994). Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity. New
York: Dover Publications. ISBN 0-486-67865-2.
L.D.Landau and E.M.Lifshitz. (1959). Theory of Elasticity.
Beer, Ferdinand Pierre; Elwood Russell Johnston, John T. DeWolf (1992). Mechanics of
Materials. McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN 0071129391.
Mase, George E. (1970). Continuum Mechanics. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0070406634.
http://books.google.ca/books?id=bAdg6yxC0xUC&rview=1.
x
x
Mase, G. Thomas; George E. Mase (1999). Continuum Mechanics for Engineers (Second
ed.). CRC Press. ISBN 0-8493-1855-6.
http://books.google.ca/books?id=uI1ll0A8B_UC&rview=1.
Rees, David (2006). Basic Engineering Plasticity - An Introduction with Engineering and
Manufacturing Applications. Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 0750680253.
http://books.google.ca/books?id=4KWbmn_1hcYC.
Brady, B.H.G.; E.T. Brown (1993). Rock Mechanics For Underground Mining (Third
ed.). Kluwer Academic Publisher. ISBN 0412475502.
Timoshenko, Stephen P.; James Norman Goodier (1970). Theory of Elasticity (Third ed.).
McGraw-Hill International Editions. ISBN 0-07-085805-5.
Article
Discussion
Edit this page
History
Personal tools
x
x
Try Beta
Navigation
x
x
x
x
x
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Search
Go
Sear c h
Interaction
x
x
x
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
x
x
x
Contact Wikipedia
Donate to Wikipedia
Help
Toolbox
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Languages
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Azrbaycan
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
Espaol
Espaol
Franais
Galego
Italiano
Latvieu
Magyar
Nederlands
Norsk (bokml)
Polski
Simple English
Slovenina
Slovenina
/ Srpski
Svenska
Suomi
Ting Vit
x
x
x
x
x