Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid
Production before after
Line_1_befor_erg

Production before

Missing
Percent

Total

Percent

Percent

23

100.0%

.0%

23

100.0%

Production after Ergonomics

23

100.0%

.0%

23

100.0%

Production before

23

100.0%

.0%

23

100.0%

Production after Ergonomics

23

100.0%

.0%

23

100.0%

Production before

23

100.0%

.0%

23

100.0%

23

100.0%

.0%

23

100.0%

Ergonomics

Line_2_befor_erg

Ergonomics

Line_3_befor_erg

Ergonomics
Production after Ergonomics

Explore

Tests of Normality
Kolmogorov-Smirnova
Production before after
Line_1_befor_erg

Production before

Statistic

df

Shapiro-Wilk

Sig.

Statistic

df

Sig.

.315

23

.000

.868

23

.006

Production after Ergonomics

.153

23

.172

.943

23

.208

Production before

.171

23

.080

.923

23

.077

Production after Ergonomics

.162

23

.119

.946

23

.245

Production before

.189

23

.033

.930

23

.109

.144

23

.200*

.948

23

.263

Ergonomics

Line_2_befor_erg

Ergonomics

Line_3_befor_erg

Ergonomics
Production after Ergonomics
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.

Regression
Variables Entered/Removed
Model
1

Variables Entered

Variables Removed

Line_3_befor_erg,

Method
. Enter

Line_1_befor_erg,
Line_2_befor_erga
a. All requested variables entered.
Model Summaryb

Model

R Square
.460a

Adjusted R

Std. Error of the

Square

Estimate

.211

.155 b
ANOVA

.46466

a.
Predictors: (Constant), Line_3_befor_erg,
Model
Sum of Squares Line_1_befor_erg,
df
Mean Square
Line_2_befor_erg
1
Regression
2.432
b. Dependent Variable: Production before after
Residual
9.068
Total

11.500

.811

42

.216

F
3.755

45

a. Predictors: (Constant), Line_3_befor_erg, Line_1_befor_erg, Line_2_befor_erg

b. Dependent Variable: Production before after

Sig.
.018a

Coefficientsa
Standardized
Unstandardized Coefficients
Model
1

Coefficients

Std. Error

Beta

(Constant)

.604

.283

Line_1_befor_erg

.000

.000

Line_2_befor_erg

1.203E-5

Line_3_befor_erg

.000

Sig.
2.131

.039

.301

1.963

.056

.000

.010

.062

.951

.000

.288

1.999

.052

a. Dependent Variable: Production before after

Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Predicted Value

1.1080

2.1053

1.5000

.23247

46

Std. Predicted Value

-1.686

2.604

.000

1.000

46

.073

.218

.132

.039

46

1.0435

2.1280

1.5049

.23435

46

-.73182

.87462

.00000

.44890

46

Std. Residual

-1.575

1.882

.000

.966

46

Stud. Residual

-1.661

1.968

-.005

1.004

46

-.84555

.95646

-.00488

.48569

46

-1.697

2.041

-.004

1.014

46

Mahal. Distance

.139

8.951

2.935

2.266

46

Cook's Distance

.000

.138

.021

.025

46

Centered Leverage Value

.003

.199

.065

.050

46

Standard Error of Predicted

Value
Adjusted Predicted Value
Residual

Deleted Residual
Stud. Deleted Residual

a. Dependent Variable: Production before after

Graph

General linear model

Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label
Production before after

1.00

Production

N
23

before
Ergonomics
2.00

Production
after
Ergonomics

Box's Test of Equality

of Covariance Matricesa
Box's M

12.202

1.883

df1

df2

14026.868

Sig.

.080

Tests the null hypothesis

that the observed
covariance matrices of
the dependent variables
are equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept +
Prod_before_after

23

Multivariate Testsb
Partial Eta
Effect

Value

Intercept

Prod_before_after

Hypothesis df

Error df

Sig.

Squared

Pillai's Trace

.953

282.671a

3.000

42.000

.000

.953

Wilks' Lambda

.047

282.671a

3.000

42.000

.000

.953

Hotelling's Trace

20.191

282.671a

3.000

42.000

.000

.953

Roy's Largest Root

20.191

282.671a

3.000

42.000

.000

.953

Pillai's Trace

.211

3.755a

3.000

42.000

.018

.211

Wilks' Lambda

.789

3.755a

3.000

42.000

.018

.211

Hotelling's Trace

.268

3.755a

3.000

42.000

.018

.211

Roy's Largest Root

.268

3.755a

3.000

42.000

.018

.211

a. Exact statistic
b. Design: Intercept + Prod_before_after

Levene's Test of Equality of Error Variancesa

F

df1

df2

Sig.

Line_1_befor_erg

2.490

44

.122

Line_2_befor_erg

.229

44

.635

Line_3_befor_erg

.431

44

.515

Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent
variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + Prod_before_after

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Type III Sum of

Partial Eta

Source

Dependent Variable

Squares

Corrected Model

Line_1_befor_erg

650692.196a

650692.196

6.612

.014

.131

Line_2_befor_erg

396367.391b

396367.391

2.431

.126

.052

Line_3_befor_erg

1.304E6

1303685.565

6.114

.017

.122

Line_1_befor_erg

5.521E7

5.521E7

560.977

.000

.927

Line_2_befor_erg

5.616E7

5.616E7

344.420

.000

.887

Line_3_befor_erg

7.525E7

7.525E7

352.902

.000

.889

Line_1_befor_erg

650692.196

650692.196

6.612

.014

.131

Line_2_befor_erg

396367.391

396367.391

2.431

.126

.052

Line_3_befor_erg

1303685.565

1303685.565

6.114

.017

.122

Line_1_befor_erg

4330023.304

44

98409.621

Line_2_befor_erg

7174270.261

44

163051.597

Line_3_befor_erg

9382054.435

44

213228.510

Line_1_befor_erg

6.019E7

46

Line_2_befor_erg

6.373E7

46

Line_3_befor_erg

8.593E7

46

Line_1_befor_erg

4980715.500

45

Line_2_befor_erg

7570637.652

45

Line_3_befor_erg

1.069E7

45

Intercept

Prod_before_after

Error

Total

Corrected Total

a. R Squared = .131 (Adjusted R Squared = .111)

b. R Squared = .052 (Adjusted R Squared = .031)
c. R Squared = .122 (Adjusted R Squared = .102)

df

Mean Square

Sig.

Squared

Estimated marginal mean

Production before after
95% Confidence Interval
Dependent Variable

Production before after

Line_1_befor_erg

Production before

Mean

Std. Error

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

976.565

65.412

844.737

1108.394

Production after Ergonomics

1214.435

65.412

1082.606

1346.263

Production before

1012.087

84.197

842.398

1181.776

Production after Ergonomics

1197.739

84.197

1028.050

1367.428

Production before

1110.652

96.285

916.602

1304.702

1447.348

96.285

1253.298

1641.398

Ergonomics

Line_2_befor_erg

Ergonomics

Line_3_befor_erg

Ergonomics
Production after Ergonomics

A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to examine the effectiveness of

ergonomics on the productivity of cutting and stitching department of apparel units.
Before conducting the MANOVA the data were examined using SPSS to ensure all of its
underlying assumption was met.
Univariate normality was assessed with Shapiro-Wilk tests was assumed. Additionally, no
multivariate outliers were found in the data, supporting the assumption of multivariate
normality. Correlation between depend quantity were low indicating that multi-co linearity
was not of concern. The relationship that did exist between the dependent variable was
roughly linear. Finally box's M was non-significant at alph =0.001 indicating that
homogeneity of variance covariance metrics could be assumed.
As all the underlying assumptions were supported by the data, a MANOVA was conducted.
Findings showed that there was a significant effect of ergonomics on the productivity.