Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Applied Geochemistry
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apgeochem
Geochemistry of highly acidic mine water following disposal into a natural lake
with carbonate bedrock
Christian Wisskirchen a,*, Bernhard Dold a,b, Kurt Friese c, Jorge E. Spangenberg a, Peter Morgenstern d,
Walter Glaesser e
a
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 21 November 2008
Accepted 26 April 2010
Available online 29 April 2010
Editorial handling by B. Wang
a b s t r a c t
Acid mine drainage (AMD) from the ZnPb(AgBiCu) deposit of Cerro de Pasco (Central Peru) and
waste water from a Cu-extraction plant has been discharged since 1981 into Lake Yanamate, a natural
lake with carbonate bedrock. The lake has developed a highly acidic pH of 1. Mean lake water chemistry
was characterized by 16,775 mg/L acidity as CaCO3, 4330 mg/L Fe and 29,250 mg/L SO4. Mean trace element concentrations were 86.8 mg/L Cu, 493 mg/L Zn, 2.9 mg/L Pb and 48 mg/L As, which did not differ
greatly from the discharged AMD. Most elements showed increasing concentrations from the surface to
the lake bottom at a maximal depth of 41 m (e.g. from 3581 to 5433 mg/L Fe and 25,609 to 35,959 mg/L
SO4). The variations in the H and O isotope compositions and the element concentrations within the
upper 10 m of the water column suggest mixing with recently discharged AMD, shallow groundwater
and precipitation waters. Below 15 m a stagnant zone had developed. Gypsum (saturation index,
SI 0.25) and anglesite (SI 0.1) were in equilibrium with lake water. Jarosite was oversaturated
(SI 1.7) in the upper part of the water column, resulting in downward settling and re-dissolution in
the lower part of the water column (SI 0.7). Accordingly, jarosite was only found in sediments from
less than 7 m water depth. At the lake bottom, a layer of gel-like material (90 wt.% water) of pH 1 with
a total organic C content of up to 4.40 wet wt.% originated from the kerosene discharge of the Cu-extraction plant and had contaminant element concentrations similar to the lake water. Below the organic layer
followed a layer of gypsum with pH 1.5, which overlaid the dissolving carbonate sediments of pH 5.37.
In these two layers the contaminant elements were enriched compared to lake water in the sequence
As < Pb Cu < Cd < Zn = Mn with increasing depth. This sequence of enrichment was explained by the
following processes: (i) adsorption of As on Fe-hydroxides coating plant roots at low pH (up to
3326 mg/kg As), (ii) adsorption at increasing pH near the gypsum/calcite boundary (up to 1812 mg/kg
Pb, 2531 mg/kg Cu, and 36 mg/kg Cd), and (iii) precipitation of carbonates (up to 5177 mg/kg Zn and
810 mg/kg Mn; all data corrected to a wet base). The inltration rate was approximately equal to the discharge rate, thus gypsum and hydroxide precipitation had not resulted in complete clogging of the lake
bedrocks.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Management of acid mine drainage (AMD) is a major problem
for the present day mining industry. Sulde-rich deposits tend to
produce highly acidic waters, if no carbonate minerals neutralize
the efuents (Plumlee and Logsdon, 1999). Pit lakes have become
a subject of increasing importance in environmental geochemistry,
* Corresponding author. Present address: Golder associates S.A., Av.11 de
Septiembre 2353 Piso 2, Providencia, Santiago, Chile. Tel.: + 56 2 594 2024;
Fax: +56 2 594 2001.
E-mail address: ChristianWisskirchen@web.de (C. Wisskirchen).
0883-2927/$ - see front matter 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2010.04.015
due to the closure of open pit mines (Castro and Moore, 2000;
Geller et al., 1998; Snchez Espaa et al., 2008). The main sources
of acidity and metals in pit lakes include oxidation of suldes from
coal and metalliferous deposits or backll, water from interconnected ooded underground mines or dissolution of sulfates by
water ushes (Bowell and Parshley, 2005; Castendyk et al., 2005;
Denimal et al., 2005; Knller et al., 2004; Pellicori et al., 2005). In
most pit lakes, the sources of contaminants are diffuse and difcult
to apportion. In pit lakes with carbonate wall rocks or carbonatecontaining veins the system is buffered to slightly basic pH,
limiting the solubility of most metals (Shevenell et al., 1999).
1108
watersediment interface. The new data set and geochemical modeling provided insights into the lake chemistry, in particular the
formation of secondary minerals, the interactions in the AMD-carbonate system, and the migration of contaminant elements.
2. Site description
Lake Yanamate is located 5 km south of the Cerro de Pasco deposit at the northern end of the Puna plateau between the Western
and Eastern Cordillera of Peru (Fig. 1A and B). This lake is part of
the mining facilities of the Cerro de Pasco mine, at present operated by Volcan Corporation S.A.A. and previously (until 1999) by
the former state company Centromin S.A. Currently the deposit is
exploited by means of both underground and open pit mining. Cerro de Pasco is one of the largest polymetallic resources of the
world. Accumulated past production and known reserves include
175 Mt @ 7% Zn, 2% Pb and 3 oz/t Ag. Further, 1.2 billon oz of
Ag and 2 million oz of Au, and an equivalent of 50 Mt of Cu have
been produced, largely before 1950 (Baumgartner et al., 2008). The
deposit is dominated by a 1800 300 m quartz-pyrite body
formed by replacement of Triassic limestone, representing
90 vol.% of the entire ore body (Enaudi, 1977). Different types of
pyrite have been described, some of them containing up to
10 wt.% As (Petersen, 1965; Ward, 1961). The main ore minerals
are sphaleritegalena, pyrrhotite, enargite, luzonite, tennantite,
marmantite, arsenopyrite and chalcopyrite (Enaudi, 1977). Final
hydrothermal and hypogene activities resulted in mineral associations dominated by pyritehematiterealgar and covellitebornite,
respectively. Supergene processes formed an enrichment blanket
of chalcocite and covellite (Petersen, 1965). The sources of mine
water were: (1) groundwater of the Cerro de Pasco fault zone inltrating into the open pit and the underground mine and (2) rainwater accumulating in the open pit, that subsequently inltrated
into underlying mine works (Luna Bernal and Delgado Venero,
1985). Old mine works on Cu minerals were used for in situ leaching with highly acidic solutions. The Cu was extracted in a SX-EW
plant using kerosene as a solvent with addition of 4 vol.% Acorga
Fig. 1. (A) Location map of the Cerro de Pasco region in Peru. (B) Map of the local geology, the open pit, discharge pipe, and Lake Yanamate. (C) Map of Lake Yanamate and
Lake Huaygacocha with sampling points. (D) Cross-section of the lake basin from west to east. The two lakes were connected during the sampling period due to the water
level being 14 m higher than before discharge began in 1981.
3. Methods
3.1. Sampling and eld methods
During sampling in June/July 2003 (dry and cold season) the
AMD discharge rate was 9.5 m3/min. The lake water table was at
4359 m above sea level (m a.s.l.) (14 m higher than in 1981), and
had a maximum depth of 41 m. The discharged AMD was sampled
from a retention tank at the pumping station. From the lake, a total
number of 45 water samples were taken at 11 sampling stations in
proles of 0.5 m, 5 m, and continued in 5 m steps down to the lake
bottom (Fig. 1C). Samples were taken with a peristaltic pump and
ltered through 0.45 lm in-line lters, into lled 60 mL HDPE bottles, sub-samples for cation analysis were acidied with HNO3
(Merck suprapure), and frozen immediately until analysis. Temperature, pH, Eh (calculated to a standard H electrode), and electrical
conductivity (EC) were measured directly in the eld with two
closed ow-through cells and a set of WTW electrodes and meters.
Hot acidity (H+ + hydrolysable metals) was measured within the
next 12 h by titration to pH 8.3 with 1.6 N NaOH after addition of
H2O2 and boiling, and reported as mg/L CaCO3 (Ficklin and Mosier,
1999).
Lake sediments were sampled by gravity coring at the same stations where water samples were taken. The 12 cores were divided
into 44 sub-samples. Nine cores of the soils of the inundated zone
(due to the increased lake water level) were taken by percussion
drilling, and were divided into 41 sub-samples. The cores were described and divided on the basis of color and grain size. Pore water
pH was measured with a Sentix SP electrode and a WTW meter.
Samples were dried at 30 C and their weight was determined before and after drying to calculate water content. Two samples of a
soil prole on Pucar limestone and two samples of the Pucar
limestone were taken as reference for background concentrations
of contaminant elements.
To study the direct interaction of the lake water with the underlying bedrock, fresh hand specimens of Pucar limestone taken in
the surroundings of the lake were placed in the lake at 0.5 m water
depth for 25 days and subsequently studied.
1109
1110
humidity of 60% (Gonatini, 1986), which is lower than the average value of 74% reported in the literature for Cerro de Pasco
(PAMA, 1996). The AMD plots between the evaporation line and
the LMWL of La Paz. The AMD waters originated mainly from
fault-waters of the Cerro de Pasco fault zone and precipitation
inltrating the underground mine.
From 15 m water depth to the surface, the mean d18O value increased from 10.6 to 9.6 and the mean d2H value from
88.7 to 82.5 (Fig. 2B). The increases in d2H and d18O values
from 15 m to 10 m and from 5 m to 0.5 m were nearly equal (0.17
d18O/m and 0.21 d18O/m, respectively). The uppermost waters
(0.5 and 5 m depth) had a mean d18O value shifted 1.6 to a more
negative value. This isotope shift can be explained by mixture of
the lake upper 5 m with recent AMD discharge and precipitation.
The deep waters of the lake (2035 m) had a relatively uniform isotope composition with d18O values 11.1 and d2H values
93.6 (Fig. 2B), indicating a stagnant bottom stratum (termed
monimolimnion), which was excluded from taking part in lake
water mixing and circulation processes.
The isotopically heaviest water (d18O 8.7 and d2H 79.7)
was at CPY14(10 m). This isotopically heavier water suggested a local contribution from the marshes SE of the lake (Fig. 1B).
4.2. Hydrogeochemistry
The AMD discharged into the lake had pH 1.1, Eh 609 mV, and
an EC of 27.4 mS/cm (Table 1). The concentrations of Fe and SO4
were 4440 mg/L and 31,875 mg/L respectively, and acidity was
18,720 mg/L as CaCO3. Copper had a concentration of 125 mg/L,
Zn 748 mg/L, Pb 4.2 mg/L and As 47.8 mg/L. These values were
close to the range reported for AMD from massive pyrite deposits
(Plumlee, 1999) and fall into the class of extremely acidic and extremely mineralized pit lakes, following the classication of Snchez Espaa et al. (2008).
The average hydrogeochemical parameters determined
from the 45 lake water samples were pH 1.0, Eh 653 mV, EC
24.1 mS/cm, 4330 mg/L Fe, 29,250 mg/L SO4, 16,775 mg/L acidity
as CaCO3, 87 mg/L Cu, 493 mg/L Zn, 3 mg/L Pb and 48 mg/L As.
These mean values did not differ greatly from values measured
for the discharged AMD.
The pH and Eh decreased slightly with depth from pH 1.2 and
672 mV at 0.5 m to pH 1.1 and Eh values between 585 and
652 mV at the lake bottom (Fig. 3A). Acidity increased from
15,712 mg/L to 19,175 mg/L as CaCO3 with depth, indicating that
dissolution of carbonate bedrock did not result in higher pH and
lower acidity at the lake bottom. Compared to the value of
27.4 mS/cm for discharged AMD, the upper 15 m of the lake water
Fig. 2. (A) d2H v/s d18O binary plot of lake water samples, discharged AMD, and the Local Meteoric Water Line of La Paz (LMWL La Paz). (B) d18O and d2H in VSMOW of
selected water columns of the lake.
Table 1
Stable isotope data of d2H and d18O, physicochemical parameters, and concentrations of selected elements in the sampled water columns of Lakes Yanamate and Huaygacocha and the Cerro de Pasco AMD. The calculated mean
concentration and standard deviation includes all water samples of both lakes. Abbreviations: EC = electrical conductivity; acy = acidity as CaCO3; n.a. = not analyzed; Stdev = standard deviation.
d2H
()
pH Eh
EC
acy
Na
K
Mg
Ca
Mn
Al
Fe
SO4
Cu
Zn
Pb
As
Si
P
Ti
V
Cr
Co
Ni
Zr
Cd
Bi
U
() (mV) (mS/cm) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (lg/L) (lg/L) (lg/L) (lg/L) (lg/L) (lg/L) (lg/L) (lg/L) (lg/L)
CPY04
0.5
5
10
14.5
9.4
10.2
9.6
10.1
82.0
83.3
82.3
85.8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
CPY05
0.5
2.5
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
CPY07
0.5
6
n.a.
n.a.
CPY09
0.5
5
10
15
20
25
CPY10
n.a.
n.a.
15,840
n.a.
16.2
16.0
17.1
17.4
30.9
29.8
31.1
31.2
221
208
216
214
383
390
419
448
178
170
176
172
248
244
265
279
3920
3950
4430
4990
29,865
29,340
31,380
33,300
477
467
493
487
2.7
2.8
2.5
2.2
48.3
47.2
50.7
56.2
14.0
13.0
14.5
15.3
33
36
36
39
515
480
431
346
1936
1924
2082
2188
181
182
199
214
156
166
189
221
299
297
325
348
66
54
44
38
n.a.
n.a.
16.5
16.5
31.1
30.9
219
218
378
377
179
179
248
247
3950
3940
3.0
2.8
52.1
47.9
13.9
13.6
35
35
563
523
2149 204
1926 178
171
159
318
289
49
96
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
16.6
16.2
30.9
29.4
219
201
378
381
179
164
248
244
3950
4050
47.6
50.1
13.9
12.1
34
36
517
439
1918 180
2068 194
161
182
281
301
58
39
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
1.5
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
673
660
657
645
637
637
18.1
21.1
23.2
27.4
29.4
29.5
15,962
16,191
17,228
19,302
19,860
19,701
17.0
17.1
18.4
19.5
19.5
19.6
31.7
31.8
34.5
35.9
35.4
35.4
224
224
233
239
227
228
384
383
397
421
413
399
184
185
196
202
191
192
251
252
278
304
300
303
4020
4050
4540
5330
5480
5520
29,025
29,325
32,340
36,150
37,050
37,050
92.8
96.8
100.0
96.4
86.8
86.8
493
500
534
557
542
549
2.9
3.5
3.0
2.8
2.8
2.8
48.1
48.8
54.3
59.3
61.1
62.4
16.4
14.8
17.0
18.4
19.4
18.3
36
36
38
39
40
39
523
515
541
502
420
454
1952
1981
2121
2296
2333
2390
183
187
192
218
228
224
160
164
180
208
224
237
290
302
316
341
354
355
48
44
41
42
35
35
1276
1266
1362
1474
1509
1516
1803
1925
1930
1475
1110
1123
116
117
128
133
136
140
0.5
5
10
15
18
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
1.0
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.6
673
659
657
651
637
21.0
23.8
25.9
27.8
31.3
14,608
17,600
16,320
16,400
21,440
14.5
18.0
18.4
18.6
19.2
28.0
32.8
34.6
35.0
35.0
201
235
231
235
223
367
389
396
393
405
162
195
194
197
188
221
266
276
282
293
3550
4240
4520
4720
5330
25,515
29,985
32,025
33,075
35,700
81.9
99.2
99.6
102.0
85.7
439
517
527
532
537
2.7
3.3
3.0
3.0
2.8
36.8
51.1
53.9
57.4
59.2
13.3
32.6
15.0
16.2
19.1
32
37
39
40
42
484
554
562
584
429
1772
2050
2114
2251
2276
165
192
195
213
218
144
168
178
189
217
266
305
308
331
343
82
62
48
47
35
1150
1336
1376
1439
1458
1745
1908
1912
1992
1119
105
122
128
131
131
CPY13
0.5
5
10
15
9.3
10.0
10.2
10.3
82.3
85.0
85.8
86.7
1.6
1.2
1.2
1.2
673
660
657
652
18.5
21.1
24.6
25.1
14,800
15,120
16,480
17,040
17.2
15.4
18.9
18.7
31.9
28.2
35.2
35.4
225
203
238
236
385
344
406
397
184
167
200
200
252
226
284
285
4020
3630
4640
4760
28,440
25,635
32,190
33,135
92.8
86.2
102.0
103.0
499
453
547
546
2.8
2.6
3.0
5.3
47.0
33.1
54.1
56.7
14.1
12.3
15.4
16.2
37
30
40
41
521
472
562
539
1922
1747
2147
2215
181
159
201
207
157
140
183
185
289
270
311
321
36
29
40
41
1239
1140
1386
1398
1794
1715
1930
1978
116
104
126
129
CPY14
0.5
5
10
15
9.8
11.3
8.6
9.8
83.6
86.6
79.7
86.7
1.1
1.5
1.4
1.4
673
659
657
654
19.5
22.3
24.2
25.4
15,696
16,928
17,248
18,272
17.1
14.9
9.7
18.6
31.4
26.9
16.5
35.1
226
192
114
239
382
383
362
394
182
159
95
198
250
216
130
281
3990
3520
2270
4680
28,110
25,005
16,365
32,880
92.1
83.0
49.9
103.0
494
432
268
540
2.8
2.7
2.8
2.9
48.1
31.6
19.8
55.8
16.4
13.9
7.1
17.4
36
30
18
33
510
443
260
565
1940 176
1649 152
1022 94
2176 207
158
134
91
186
284
248
160
326
34
23
7
39
1266
1079
676
1383
1801 115
1740 95
1439 60
1960 126
CPY16
0.5
5
10
17
10.2
10.9
10.7
11.7
83.2
86.2
85.0
91.7
1.4
1.3
1.2
n.a.
672
660
656
636
19.1
22.9
24.9
31.3
15,920
16,160
17,792
19,296
17.4
15.2
18.6
19.1
32.0
27.3
35.1
35.1
226
195
234
222
388
391
401
405
186
161
197
187
254
221
280
292
4050
3550
4600
5330
28,620
14,085
14,205
35,550
93.6
83.7
101.0
85.6
502
414
536
532
2.7
2.7
3.0
2.7
47.7
32.0
54.4
61.1
15.1
15.4
14.7
18.8
34
30
38
40
510
440
539
446
1960
1668
2121
2327
183
158
195
227
159
132
180
225
292
249
326
357
30
71
57
39
1255
1057
1371
1462
1801 112
1730 96
1871 125
1132 134
CPY19
0.5
5
10
16
9.8
10.5
9.8
11.2
83.3
87.2
84.5
91.5
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
673
660
657
641
18.9
22.1
24.6
28.8
14,480
14,880
16,512
18,320
17.1
17.7
18.5
18.9
31.7
32.6
34.7
35.0
223
232
232
228
384
387
398
412
183
192
195
189
251
263
277
294
4000
4190
4530
5230
28,350
29,490
31,650
35,100
92.6
99.3
100.0
87.6
497
511
532
540
2.8
2.9
2.8
2.8
47.1
50.6
54.4
60.2
13.9
14.1
15.2
17.7
34
35
38
39
507
536
554
482
1904
1997
2159
2314
177
189
199
215
155
163
181
219
282
298
318
343
32
35
41
34
1219
1297
1369
1477
1737
1884
1906
1225
110
118
125
133
CPY20
0.5
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
8.9
10.3
9.6
10.6
11.2
11.2
10.9
11.1
80.9
86.1
85.5
89.7
93.9
93.9
92.8
93.6
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
672
662
657
650
637
631
589
588
19.3
21.0
23.9
26.1
30.1
30.6
30.4
29.5
15,360
15,840
16,800
17,920
18,800
20,240
20,992
20,160
7.4
11.9
19.3
17.7
16.3
16.6
40.1
40.8
11.1
20.2
36.4
33.2
29.1
27.4
35.4
36.4
80.6
148
243
227
204
185
208
214
392
376
419
401
413
403
459
466
64
121
205
191
171
156
188
193
84
163
291
267
242
229
371
384
1440
2670
4760
4710
5030
4760
7010
7180
11,205
19,050
33,255
32,355
32,340
30,375
41,250
42,300
33.5
62.7
105.0
99.6
82.6
74.0
76.1
78.1
180
332
564
529
503
473
728
746
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.9
2.6
2.6
2.8
2.6
12.7
24.4
54.2
53.8
49.0
46.6
63.1
58.1
5.9
12.3
20.5
17.3
17.3
19.4
22.9
21.7
12
22
37
37
32
31
44
33
170
339
524
495
340
329
412
415
686
1286
2104
2074
1871
1833
3251
3018
63
120
200
197
178
176
367
338
59
107
178
195
214
199
342
323
105
195
310
322
320
302
555
524
n.a.
11
33
31
19
14
20
15
450
824
1346
1331
1256
1219
2357
2240
1434
1637
1834
1747
986
956
800
756
38
73
123
118
106
99
133
126
CPY27
0.5
3.5
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
16,000 11.9
15,840 13.2
20.5
23.5
148
167
338
327
120
135
164
183
2660
3010
2.5
2.4
23.8
27.4
14.1
11.2
22
26
330
381
1265 122
1444 140
102
121
188
207
8
15
798 1392
931 1444
73
83
17,193 17.8
30.9
211
394
176
255
4327
2.8
48.0
15.8
34
467
1996 190
177
304
39
0.8
1865
5.6
5.4
33
26
29
53
1042
95
0.4
12.0
4.1
89
49
50
73
18
18,720 19.1
40.6
375
391
287
284
4440
4.2
47.8
24.2
2304 209
156
348
44
4.1
0.3
20
19.5
21.7
23.4
25.9
4.1
91.1
86.1
82.9
68.7
6749 15
0.1
660
427
388
21
1111
MEAN
lake
Stdev
lake
AMD
673
661
650
621
1112
Fig. 3. (A) pH, Eh, electrical conductivity (EC), acidity (Acy). (B,C,D) Element concentration distribution of Na, K, Mg, Ca, Mn, Al, Fe, SO4, Cu, Zn, Pb and As in 11 water columns
sampled from Lake Yanamate and Lake Huaygacocha. (E) Saturation indices (SIs) for gypsum, anglesite, jarosite and strengite, calculated with PHREEQCI V2 and the minteq
database. Vertical dashed lines mark values for inowing AMD.
3Fe3 K 2SO2
4 6H2 O () KFe3 OH6 SO4 2 6H
1113
1114
Fig. 4. Sedimentology, mineralogy, pH, TIC, TOC, water content, and bulk chemical data (corrected to a wet base) of selected sediment cores of Lake Yanamate. For better
visibility, graphs of trace elements have varying scales.
deeper parts of the proles. The mean water content was lower and
varied much more than in the gels, from 14 to 84 (mean 51) wt.%.
TOC was between 1.4 and 3.3 (mean 1.7) wt.% and TIC was only
found in samples in which dolomite or calcite was detected. These
layers appear to originate from a former minor loose sediment layer
on top of the bedrock, because reference samples of carbonate bedrock did not contain any TOC. The pH was between 1.4 and 4.5 where
no carbonate was detected. Gypsum was absent in the detrital-enriched layer at CPY13, and was formed by the inltrating acidic sulfate solutions, with dissolved calcite as a source of Ca. Where
carbonates were present, pH increased and stabilized at around 5
5.6, consistent with the modeled equilibrium pH of 5.3 for average
lake water with calcite (Figs. 4 and 5).
Down to the maximum sampled depth of 69 cm, no unaltered
limestone bedrock was reached. The experiment with limestone
specimens put in the lake for about one month showed that, as a
rst step, the acidic water of the lake inltrated the fractures of
the limestone bedrock. In thin sections, hydroxides or hydroxysulfates were visible in the fractures. Additional to Fe- and possibly
Al-hydroxides, the formation of gypsum (replacing calcite) may
clog fractures, because gypsum occupies twice the volume of calcite and could decrease the inltration rate.
4.4. Characterization of soil sediments
All soils except CPY18 had a root layer on top and only CPY07
and CPY24 (both located in Lake Huaygacocha) were covered by
a 10 or 40 cm thick layer of liquid gel, respectively. Soils were
mainly of argillaceous grain size. Root-containing layers exhibited
a middle brown color; deeper horizons were light brown, or in
some samples ochre or oxide red where high concentrations of
Fe were detected.
Table 2
Element concentrations of some selected sediment and soil proles. Element concentrations were corrected to a wet base. Abbreviations: TIC = total inorganic C; TOC: total organic C; ref soil = reference soil; n.a. = not analyzed;
bdl = below detection limit.
Depth
(cm)
TIC
TOC
H2O
Al2O3 SiO2
CaO
Fe2O3 S
K2O
P2O5
V
Cr
Mn
Ni
Cu
Zn
As
Sr
Zr
Pb
U
Bi
Cd
(wt.%) (wt.%) (wt.%) (wt.%) (wt.%) (wt.%) (wt.%) (wt.%) (wt.%) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
0.04
0.49
0.08
0.31
5.99
8.12
2.36
3.61
8.85
1.65
68
40
46
58
43
0.47
0.61
0.41
1.62
0.10
3.28
2.50
2.33
4.85
0.70
0.10
0.11
0.07
0.10
bdl
2.62
15.65
8.07
4.00
27.54
2.11
2.84
9.00
3.34
1.28
1.65
6.45
4.67
2.07
0.18
1509
355
1346
1488
266
5
10
25
21
bdl
8
bdl
8
8
bdl
120
111
103
171
539
4
bdl
4
3
bdl
464
463
346
1391
15
387
368
332
846
2258
1436
989
2157
265
13
58
210
122
77
382
13
4
6
16
3
100
87
51
202
6
3.5
bdl
bdl
4.2
bdl
46.7
21.0
8.1
bdl
bdl
2.0
7.6
2.9
21.8
3.0
CPY07 05
510
1015
1518
1825
3035
4550
n.a.
n.a.
0.04
0.34
0.70
3.37
2.74
n.a.
n.a.
1.88
2.14
3.18
2.37
1.50
92
93
84
51
73
62
75
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.09
0.33
0.02
0.02
0.20
0.14
0.59
0.70
1.25
0.48
0.15
0.03
0.03
0.08
0.14
bdl
bdl
bdl
0.25
0.17
2.73
11.03
7.20
17.37
11.90
0.95
0.87
1.45
4.04
0.59
1.26
0.18
0.50
0.39
1.65
5.69
1.97
0.19
0.08
94
72
218
699
309
263
83
bdl
bdl
2
8
4
bdl
bdl
2
2
2
bdl
5
bdl
bdl
80
57
70
59
79
370
74
1
1
1
2
1
bdl
bdl
47
36
54
127
648
17
9
246
177
188
172
888
890
37
81
79
567
2402
135
13
13
22
20
43
104
88
309
165
3
3
1
1
1
bdl
1
39
45
84
212
128
3
3
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
1.2
bdl
bdl
63.0
60.1
41.3
10.3
6.2
bdl
bdl
0.7
0.5
0.8
1.0
18.9
bdl
bdl
CPY10 010
1020
2030
3032
3235
3740
4045
0.05
n.a.
n.a.
n.a.
1.79
n.a.
2.12
1.90
3.64
n.a.
n.a.
1.35
n.a.
3.25
92
91
88
54
16
84
72
0.07
0.07
0.12
0.80
6.26
0.32
0.28
0.36
0.66
0.93
4.72
35.02
0.87
1.99
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.14
1.08
0.03
0.07
0.44
0.15
0.11
9.75
11.92
0.72
9.27
0.71
0.43
0.74
0.77
2.61
1.04
1.26
0.68
0.37
0.50
4.95
3.48
0.69
0.31
50
81
101
990
11,617
650
372
1
1
2
13
56
3
5
3
2
3
10
45
3
3
137
70
135
156
544
154
266
1
1
2
2
16
4
3
132
69
60
391
130
19
13
550
314
510
575
3084
1501
1235
62
40
64
68
263
55
21
7
4
5
112
274
17
125
1
2
3
6
36
3
4
8
3
5
16
22
4
3
0.4
0.7
0.3
bdl
1.8
0.7
0.6
1.9
5.9
51.2
9.7
1.7
0.5
bdl
2.4
0.9
1.4
2.3
3.6
0.8
bdl
n.a.
n.a.
8.58
47.93
1.43
0.38
18.91
10.68
3800
66
41
937
13
1650
59,220
1630
730
112
11,700
2.2
474.0
231.1
CPY13 010
1220
2030
3040
0.27
0.11
0.02
n.a.
1.64
3.39
2.80
n.a.
63
76
80
81
2.81
0.21
0.14
0.06
18.87
3.16
0.98
0.59
0.52
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.10
4.23
4.00
5.08
4.96
0.57
0.42
0.61
2.85
2.33
2.20
0.37
1032
113
88
240
19
6
4
bdl
25
6
4
bdl
138
77
64
84
7
bdl
1
1
814
948
402
20
10,323
476
983
598
403
67
371
27
303
69
55
82
33
6
1
1
3076
142
58
34
2.0
2.1
0.9
bdl
157.3
87.8
2.0
2.3
38.0
2.3
13.8
0.6
CPY14 07
711
1116
1618
1825
2530
0.09
0.23
0.11
0.06
0.95
0.81
2.52
4.40
3.83
3.54
3.36
3.69
91
89
73
67
79
75
0.09
0.05
0.19
1.65
0.46
1.01
0.35
0.28
1.10
1.67
3.22
6.36
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.13
0.25
0.22
0.21
5.53
6.43
4.69
4.04
1.03
0.44
0.57
0.76
1.04
1.21
0.75
0.34
2.89
3.52
0.50
0.55
22
55
bdl
3175
561
927
2
4
5
10
5
11
4
3
5
9
5
9
179
67
88
116
131
120
2
1
bdl
3
5
9
151
231
405
638
20
13
720
298
296
427
662
598
80
53
66
1908
81
80
6
5
59
76
80
96
1
1
2
3
6
11
13
8
10
77
4
6
0.3
1.5
1.2
1.1
0.9
1.1
1.8
3.3
1.4
1.3
bdl
bdl
2.3
0.8
1.4
2.3
7.6
0.5
CPY20 07
714
1421
0.06
1.22
n.a.
1.77
2.14
n.a.
88
86
88
0.18
0.07
0.06
1.46
1.20
1.49
0.02
0.01
0.01
1.97
4.40
2.91
0.62
0.24
0.09
0.97
0.14
0.08
530
411
319
3
2
bdl
7
bdl
1
107
54
36
2
1
1
186
19
6
964
54
33
102
10
5
34
75
54
1
1
1
157
35
4
0.3
bdl
bdl
10.0
1.0
0.2
4.3
bdl
0.3
CPY23 05
510
1015
1520
2025
2530
0.00
0.01
n.a.
0.05
0.00
0.12
4.10
2.41
1.41
1.11
1.54
1.54
85
86
75
70
61
59
0.11
0.08
0.06
0.14
2.62
4.84
0.47
0.47
0.67
0.90
1.96
2.41
0.01
0.01
0.11
0.06
bdl
bdl
0.83
2.15
4.36
5.28
8.05
6.98
1.21
0.69
3.23
4.37
1.68
2.03
1.21
1.48
2.52
2.97
4.36
4.03
119
bdl
1166
1322
254
bdl
2
bdl
6
16
23
25
5
2
bdl
7
10
7
283
153
86
104
121
437
4
2
4
2
bdl
bdl
252
127
68
144
1728
2531
887
431
252
314
443
3847
109
64
3328
1830
98
18
13
27
79
89
115
104
4
2
1
bdl
bdl
bdl
14
40
181
14
5
8
0.6
0.3
bdl
bdl
5.6
9.8
56.7
41.6
34.6
2.1
bdl
bdl
2.8
1.8
0.9
1.4
6.6
7.2
CPY25 05
510
1015
1520
2027
2735
2.65
2.72
4.39
6.84
7.45
7.78
0.02
0.86
3.70
1.25
0.07
0.00
61
48
49
44
43
40
0.10
0.12
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.10
0.33
0.35
0.44
0.42
0.46
0.70
0.03
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
9.77
14.61
21.63
27.37
27.81
28.21
0.95
0.74
1.05
0.88
1.55
2.26
4.96
6.66
1.10
0.30
0.23
0.26
272
303
742
723
642
512
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
5
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
78
88
192
294
516
808
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
96
155
83
39
18
5
197
362
1324
1436
3422
5177
431
289
38
19
29
3
104
145
349
463
503
518
2
2
1
1
2
4
142
66
111
61
14
6
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
bdl
1.8
77.4
65.9
6.4
2.6
3.0
bdl
0.8
2.6
1.5
0.9
6.1
1.8
Ref.
1020
soil
2030
6.18
1.12
n.a.
4.50
69.86
1.13
1.46
1.37
0.11
4167
39
37
817
11
67
245
76
105
74
165
2.2
2.0
bdl
3.63
1.15
n.a.
6.69
70.80
1.86
1.67
2.11
0.12
5502
65
43
1173
14
22
303
81
124
93
65
bdl
bdl
bdl
CPY06 06
614
1420
2026
2934
1115
1116
Fig. 5. Sedimentology, mineralogy, pH, TIC, TOC, water content, and bulk chemical data (corrected to a wet base) of selected soil cores of Lake Yanamate (CPY25 and CPY06)
and of Lake Huaygacocha (CPY07), and one sediment core of Lake Huaygacocha (CPY23). For better visibility, graphs of trace elements have varying scales.
CPY06 had comparatively high TOC with 8.1 and 8.9 wt.% in the
upper root-containing horizon and between 21 and 26 cm, where
the brownish color indicated a former top-soil (Fig. 5B). CPY06 is
located in the Pampa area between the two lakes and may have
had dense vegetation before the discharge period. Other soil samples had TOC contents 64 wt.%. Soil layers that were free of calcite
(XRD and TIC results) had a pH of 12. In deeper layers, where
calcite was detected as a residual (CPY06) or dominating mineral
(CPY25), the pH was >5 (Fig. 5).
4.5. Jarosite in solid samples down to 7 m water depth
Jarosite was found in all the 3 soil samples from the smaller
Lake Huaygacocha: in liquid gel of two cores at 7 m water depth
(CPY24 and CPY07) and once in the clay size matrix for a core at
3.5 m water depth (CPY05). In contrast, two cores taken at 14 m
water depth near the center of Lake Huaygacocha did not show
jarosite (CPY04 and CPY23). The cores CPY07 and CPY23 are
shown in Fig. 5. The occurrence of jarosite as detected by XRD
is in accordance with the results of modeling, which showed that
jarosite is stable in the upper part but not in the deeper part of
the water body. It could not be explained by the modeling, why
jarosite was found only in the sediments of the smaller Lake
Huaygacocha. Similar to a Na-jarosite formation in a waste
H2SO4 lake with a pH 0.85 (Schuiling and van Gaans, 1997),
concentrations of contaminant metals and As contained in Lake
Huaygacochas K-jarosite bearing layers were 1001000 times
lower than in jarosites from Zn industries, because the sorption
of metals is positively correlated with pH (Bigham and Nordstrom, 2000).
4.6. Trace metal and arsenic distribution in gels
Samples CPY10(010 cm) and CPY14(07 cm) (Fig. 4) had comparatively low concentrations of Al2O3 and SiO2 in their liquid gel
matrices (0.07 and 0.09 wt.% Al2O3; 0.36 and 0.35 wt.% SiO2,
respectively). Thus detrital input was minimal for these two samples and geochemical data was interpreted as characteristic for the
gel-like matter. Both had similar pH of 1.2 and 1.5, similar water
content of 91 and 92 wt.%, and similar TOC of 1.9 and 2.2 wt.%,
respectively. The absence of detritus allowed the element concentrations in the liquid gels to be compared with those of the overlying water. CPY10(010 cm) and CPY14(07 cm) had 132 and
151 mg/kg Cu, 550 and 720 mg/kg Zn, and 62 and 80 mg/kg As,
respectively, thus they were not signicantly enriched in these elements compared to the overlying water with 85.7 mg/L Cu,
537 mg/L Zn, and 59 mg/L As for CPY10(18 m) bottom water. Lead
was more highly concentrated in the gel than in the overlying
water, with values of 8 and 13 mg/kg, respectively, compared to
2.8 mg/L in CPY10 and 2.9 mg/L Pb in CPY14 for the bottom water,
conrming its settling from the water column in form of anglesite.
With the exception of Pb, none of the contaminant metals, Fe (2482
and 3602 mg/kg), or Mn (137 and 179 mg/kg) were xed in the gel
but were mobile in the gels pore water (water content 92 and
91 wt.%). If metals were xed in any form, the high hydraulic permeability of the gel-like matter would have resulted in diffusion
and downward migration of metals from the overlying lake water
into the pore water and consequently in concentrations higher
than those in the lake water.
The rigid gel of CPY10(1020 and 2030 cm) had values for
major and trace elements similar to those of the overlying liquid
gel (Fig. 4C) while rigid gel of CPY14 did not (Fig. 4B). Prole
CPY14 contained calcite below 18 cm and had a pH of 5.6. Directly
above the calcite a layer with gypsum concretions formed,
where up to 638 mg/kg Cu and 1908 mg/kg As had precipitated
(Fig. 4B).
1117
1118
form of carbonates (Zn and Mn). The layers of OMA and more
importantly gypsum lowered the contact of AMD solutions with
the carbonate bedrock and thus hindered the neutralization of
the lake water. No distinct crust was found that could have acted
as a self-sealing protection mechanism, such as found by Schuiling
and van Gaans (1997) and inltration into the bedrock was equal
to discharge of AMD. Clogging and armoring of bedrock fractures
has not resulted in a considerable decrease in inltration of lake
water.
Acknowledgements
We thank the mining company Volcan Compaa Mineria S.A.A.
for logistic and nancial support during the eldwork, especially V.
Gobitz, F. Grimaldo, L. Osorio and W. Heredia. Further, we wish to
thank SVS Ingenieros S.A., in particular Ing. A. Samaniego for providing eld equipment and M. Torres for his help during sampling.
We thank W. Schmitz, G. Kommischau, and P. Schreck, University
of Leipzig, for analytical support and helpful discussions and the
team of the Centre danalyse minrale, University of Lausanne, particularly H.-R. Pfeifer and J. Smuda, for help during eldwork, discussions and improvement of the manuscript. Financial support
from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and from
the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) is gratefully
acknowledged. The comments of two anonymous reviewers are
appreciated.
5. Conclusions
At Lake Yanamate, a combination of hydrogeochemical, stable
isotope, bulk chemical and mineralogical methods were used to
study the controls on processes of the lake water chemistry and
the watersediment interaction at the lake bottom.
The mean lake water composition did not differ signicantly
from the discharged AMD and was dominated by high Fe and
SO4 concentrations and acidity. The lake showed an increase of
electrical conductivity and the concentrations of most elements
with depth. Stable isotope results for d2H and d18O indicate a local
origin of discharged AMD. Trends of stable isotopes within the lake
water body showed the inuence of evaporation for the upper
10 m and the local inltration of near-surface groundwater for
the eastern part of the lake. Below 15 m a stagnant zone with
near-equal values for stable isotopes and element concentrations
had developed. Modeling suggested that gypsum, anglesite, strengite and jarosite to some extent controlled the lake water chemistry.
Anglesite caused a homogeneous concentration of 2.8 mg/L Pb in
the lake, whereas jarosite formed within the upper part of the lake,
settled, and dissolved in the deeper part of the water column,
resulting in downward element transport. This cycling was conrmed by the presence of jarosite being limited to cores from
67 m water depth. The low pH was the limiting factor in mineral
precipitation. Reaction of lake water with carbonate bedrock did
not cause lower acidity or higher pH in the bottom layer of the
lake.
Discharged kerosene most likely caused the occulation of Oil
mineral agglomerates (OMA) that settled and formed a gel-like
layer on top of the lake bottom. Metal and As concentrations recalculated to a wet base showed no enrichment within this material
compared to the overlying water, thus the OMA did not adsorb
these elements. In the sediments below, a layer of gypsum with
pH 11.5 was found on top of dissolving calcite with pH 5.37.
In many samples the pore water pH was around 5.3, in accordance
to the modeled pH for lake water in equilibrium with calcite. For
the sediments, a migration sequence of As < Pb Cu < Cd <
Zn = Mn was found. This sequence is explained by adsorption on
Fe-hydroxides at low pH (As), adsorption at increasing pH near
the gypsum/calcite boundary (Pb, Cu and Cd), and xation in the
References
Acero, P., Ayora, C., Torrent, C., Nieto, J.-M., 2006. The behavior of trace elements
during schwertmannite precipitation and subsequent transformation into
goethite and jarosite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 41304139.
Allison, J.D., Brown, D.S., Novo-Gradac, K.J., 1991. MINTEQA2, A geochemical
assessment data base and test cases for environmental systems: Vers. 3.0 users
manual, EPA, Athens.
Arakaki, T., Mucci, A., 1995. A continuous and mechanistic representation of calcite
reaction-controlled kinetics in dilute solutions at 25 C and 1 atm total
pressure. Aquat. Geochem. 1, 105130.
Baumgartner, R., Fontbot, L., Vennemann, T., 2008. Mineral zoning and
geochemistry of epithermal polymetallic ZnPbAgCuBi mineralization at
Cerro de Pasco. Peru. Econ. Geol. 103, 493537.
Bigham, J.M., Nordstrom, D.K., 2000. Iron and aluminum hydroxysulfates from acid
sulfate waters. In: Alpers, C.N., Jambor, J.L., Nordstrom, D.K. (Eds.), Sulfate
Minerals Crystallography, Geochemistry, and Environmental Signicance.
Mineralogical Society of America/Geochemical Society, Washington, DC, pp.
351403.
Bowell, R.J., Parshley, J.V., 2005. Control of pit-lake water chemistry by secondary
minerals, Summer Camp pit, Getchell mine. Nevada. Chem. Geol. 215, 373385.
Bozau, E., Bechstedt, T., Friese, K., Frmmichen, R., Herzsprung, P., Koschorreck, M.,
Meier, J., Vlkner, C., Wendt-Potthoff, K., Wieprecht, M., Geller, W., 2007.
Biotechnological remediation of an acidic pit lake: Modelling the basic
processes in a mesocosm experiment. J. Geochem. Explor. 92, 212221.
Bragg, Y.R., Yang, S.H., 1995. Clayoil occulation and its effects on the rate of
natural cleansing in Prince William Sound following the Exxon Valdez oil spill.
In: Wells, P.G., Butler, J.N., Hughes, J.S. (Eds.), Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Fate and
Effects in Alaskan Waters. American Society of Testing and Materials,
Philadelphia, pp. 178214.
Castendyk, D.N., Mauk, J.L., Webster, J.G., 2005. A mineral quantication method for
wall rocks at open pit mines, and application to the Martha AuAg mine, Waihi,
New Zealand. Appl. Geochem. 20, 135156.
Castro, J.M., Moore, J.N., 2000. Pit lakes; their characteristics and the potential for
their remediation. Environ. Geol. 39, 12541260.
Cravotta III, C.A., 2008. Laboratory and eld evaluation of a ushable oxic limestone
drain for treatment of net-acidic drainage from a ooded anthracite mine,
Pennsylvania, USA. Appl. Geochem. 12, 34043422.
Cravotta III, C.A., Trahan, M.K., 1999. Limestone drains to increase pH and remove
dissolved metals from acidic mine drainage. Appl. Geochem. 14, 581606.
Denimal, S., Bertrand, C., Mudry, J., Paquette, Y., Hochart, M., Steinmann, M., 2005.
Evolution of the aqueous geochemistry of mine pit lakes Blanzy-Montceaules-Mines coal basin (Massif Central, France): origin of sulfate contents; effects
of stratication on water quality. Appl. Geochem. 20, 825839.
Dold, B., Wade, C., Fontbot, L., 2009. Water management for acid mine drainage
control at the polymetallic ZnPb(AgBiCu) deposit Cerro de Pasco, Peru. J.
Geochem. Explor. 100, 133141.
Dorronsoro, C., Martin, F., Ortiz, I., Garca, I., Simn, M., Fernndez, E., Aguilar, J.,
Fernndez, J., 2002. Migration of trace elements from pyrite tailings in
carbonate soils. J. Environ. Qual. 31, 829835.
1119