Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
- Considered British influences on education, law, culture and industry as beneficial to Indian
- Joined the Imperial Legislative Council
- No real power or authority
- Instrumental in:
- passing the Child Marriages Restraint Act
- Helped establish the Indian Military Academy
- All indian muslim league
- Initially avoided joining
- Regarded in too muslim orientated
- Joined in 1913
- Became president in 1916
- Architect of the Lucknow pact
- Between congress and the league
- Bringing them together on most issues regarding self-government and presenting a united
front to the british
Governor General
- Jinnah became first governor general of pakistan and president of its constituent assembly
- Inauguration speech
- Spoke of an inclusive and pluralist democracy
- Equal rights for all citizens regardless of religion, caste or creed
- Debate in pakistan over whether Jinnah wanted a secular state
- Islamic supporters assert that his speech was taken out on context
- Comparison of other speeches
- On October 11, 1947, in an address to Civil, Naval, Military and
Air Force Officers of Pakistan Government, Karachi, he said:
We should have a State in which we could live and breathe as
free men and which we could develop according to our own
lights and culture and where principles of Islamic social justice
could find free play
- Endless violence between hindus and muslims
- Agreed with indian leaders to organise a exchange of populations in the punjab and bengal
- Millions of people left as refugees
- Personally effected and depressed by the intense violence
- Annexation of the princely state of Kalat
- Suppress the insurgency in baluchistan
- Owing to his role in the states creation- popular and influential politician
- Pivotal role in
- Protecting the rights of minorities
- Establishing colleges
- Military institutions
- Pakistans financial policy
secure the welfare, happiness and prosperity of mankind. Speech at the opening ceremony of State
Bank of Pakistan, Karachi July 1, 1948
It has been argued by many people that in this speech Jinnah wanted to point out that Pakistan would be a
secular state as mostly people think that an Islamic state is a theocratic state, this perception is however
wrong and is miss interpreted, the reason is because a true Islamic state is not a theocratic state ,as rightly
stated by Jinnah in his speech. Because in a theocratic state the civil leader is believed to have a direct
personal connection with god, which is contrary to the principles of an Islamic state.
- Role take different course- instead of being a strong advocate for Hindu Muslim unity- Jinnah became a decisive
figure for the division of people and a nation
- After 1940 Lahore conference- Pakistan adopted as the main goal of the League- Jinnah fought tirelessly for
the partition of India
- New role to cause dire consequences for a state where the two religious of Hinduism and Islam had lived side
by side
each other
- Rise in the amount of journals= rise in nationalism
Educate Indian in a western fashion- British legislator- Richards 1979)
- Led to the rise in Indian resentment of British imperialism and loss of British
control
- Well read Indian encourted European principles- e.g. Human rights
liberalism
- Direct contrast to the imperialism practiced by the British in India
- Led to Indians desire for freedom to practice their own customs
- Congress
- 1885, Hume secured the Viceroys approval to crate an Indian National Union- affiliated with the
government and act as a platform to voice Indian public opinion
Background
Family Background and Education
parliament
Developed largely constitutionalist views on Indian self-government
- Condemned the arrogance of the British soldiers in India and the discrimination practiced by them
against Indians
Western world- inspired his political life and personal preferences
- When it came to dress- donned western style clothing
- 1927- Jinnah entered negotiations with Muslim and Hindu leaders on the issue of a future constitution
- During the Simon Commission
- League wanted separate electorates
- Drafted the 14 point plan
- Failure = Metcalf- distrust which was never subsequently to be overcome
- Seen as a turning point after which partition became far more likely
- Congress wanted joint ones
- RTC
- Gandhi claimed that Congress represented everyone and that no minority safeguards were needed
- Communal Award- gave separate electorates to all minority groups
- 1930- Iqbal proposed the idea of a separate Muslim nation
- Jinnah dismissed the idea
- Disillusioned by the collapse of the RTC
- Muslim student- published a pamphlet- advocated a separate Muslim stated- named Pakistan
- Jinnah= furious
- Believed India should remain a united whole
- Muslim interests were being sacrificed by the chaotic situation within the Muslim League
- In the hands of the rich landlords with limited horizons
- Vs the Congress which was emerging as the leading party for Indian independence
- Publication of the now or never pamphlet- highlighted the concept of a separate Muslim state
- Motivated young Muslim intellectuals
- Prominent Muslim leaders made efforts to convince Jinnah to return from London and take charge of a nowreunited League
- Jinnah realised that organising the Muslims of India into a powerful and dynamic organised was badly needed
- Combined a meeting of various fractions of the League- Jinnah elected president
- Radical transformation of the League into a mass party
- Represent all sections of the Muslim Community
- Performed 2 important tasks
- Unite and activate the league as the sole representative body of the Muslims of India
- Continue the struggle for freedom on India on constitutional lines
- Stressed that Congress would not win the battle of freedom until it gained the support of all
communities
- I am convinced that the Congress policy is to divide the Muslim community amongst
themselves. It is the same old tactic of the British government. Don't fall into the trap
Reorganization = difficult task
- Opposition from petty politicians with local interests
- Peter Hardy- no one foresaw the transformation of the arrogant, proud, cold blooded lawyer Jinnah
into the charismatic Muslim leader of the 1940s and the transformation of the League inot a mass
movement
- Jinnah started to understand that in order for him to gain the approval of the Muslims- he had to reshape himself as
more of a religious leader
- Change his appearance- started to create a public image- symbolic dress
- Came up with the two nation theory
Demand for Pakistan
- Jinnah converted to the idea that Muslims needed a separate state to protect their rights
- Failure to work with congress
- Came to believe that Muslims and Hindus were distinct nations with unbridgeable differences- 2 nation
theory
- A united India would lead to the marginalisation of Muslims and eventual civil war
- Why?
- Correspondence with Iqual
- 1940, Lahore session- Pakistan adopted as the main goal of the party
- Wolpert- this is the moment when Jinnah as the former ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity totally
transformed himself into Pakistan's great leader
- Cripps mission
HSC STUDY BUDDY
- Jinnah left a legacy as one of the most controversially portrayed figures in contemporary Asian history
- Historians Seervia and Jala-assert that Jinnah never wanted partition
- It was the outcome of the Congress leaders being unwilling to share power with the League
- That Jinnah only used Pakistan as a method to mobilize support to obtain significant political rights for
Muslims
- Not many man in history can boast of creating a nation single handedly and altering the map of the world but Jinnah
-
Outline the main features in the background and rise to prominence of the personality you have
studied.
Mohammed Ali Jinnah (1876- 1948) was born to a middle class, Islamic family in the Karachi
district of India. Growing up in the context of burgeoning community divisions and rising national
sentiments, Jinnah from a young age was confronted with the issues surrounding the occupation of
India by the British. After completing his schooling at the Christian Missionary Society High
School, Jinnah was offered an apprenticeship at the London office of Grahams shipping and trading
company. After leaving the company, Jinnah became compelled to study law and became the
youngest south asian to be called to the bar in England. Whilst in London, Jinnah was inspired by
English society and their systems of law which was to have a major impact on his later life. He was
exposed to the British constitution and democratic system of government, all of which he wished to
extend to India. Jinnah was also exposed to politics by Indian politician Dadabhi Naoroji and
helped with Naorojis successful campaign for a seat in British parliament.
After being placed under substantial pressure to return home when his fathers business was ruined,
Jinnah left for India in 1896. Settling in Bombay, he became a successful lawyer, gaining
considerable fame for his skilled handling of the Caucus Case. In 1896, Jinnah also joined the
Congress. Like many fellow Congressmen, Jinnah did not favour outright independence as he
considered British influences on education, law and culture beneficial to India. As a member of
Congress, Jinnah was able to join the Imperial Legislative Council and became instrumental in
passing the Child Marriages Restraint Act. Although Jinnah was of Muslim heritage, he did not
initially join the Muslim League as he believed their platform anti-nationalist and too muslim
orientated. However, due to the decision of the British Government to annul the partition of Bengal,
the Muslim leadership decided to change its stance on British loyalty. In 1913, Jinnah entered the
League with the aim of bridging the gap between the Muslims and Hindus and rose to presidency in
1916.
As a decisive member of both parties, Jinnah began to rise to prominence. In 1916, he architected
the Lucknow Pact in hope of bringing the two parties together on major issues and presenting a
united front to the British. As a result, Jinnah was named the ambassador of Hindu Muslim unity
and the two groups began holding joint sessions. In 1920, Jinnahs standing within the Congress
came under question. As Congress moved towards strategies for gaining independence, Congress
leader Gandhi proposed non-violence and civil-disobedience. Jinnah on the other hand, who had
learnt the importance of constitutional methods from his time in London strongly opposed Gandhis
methods in fear that they would lead to communal divisions. These differences in ideology
eventually forced Jinnah to resign from Congress.
Despite the fallout with Congress, Jinnah was determined to keep the two parties united and avoid
mass communal divisions. In 1927, Britain conducted a review of the Indian administration and
sent over the Simon Commission. The League and Congress constructed responses to this
commission but while Congress wanted joint electorates, the League pushed for separate electorates
in majority Muslim provinces. Jinnah tried to come to a compromise with his 14-point-plan but his
efforts were rejected by Congress. Historian Metcalf suggests that this was a turning point for
Jinnah as it led to his distrust of Congress, distrust which was never subsequently to be overcome.
Jinnah spent his next few years in London. However, back in India Muslim interests were being
sacrificed due to chaotic situation Jinnah had left behind. The League had fallen into the hands of
the rich landlords which allowed Congress to emerge as the leading party for Indian rights. After
being begged by prominent Muslim leaders, such as Muhammad Iqbal, Jinnah returned to India to
reorganised the League into a dynamic organisation. In doing so, he performed two vital tasks;
activating the League as the sole representative body of the Muslims in India and stressed that
Congress would not win the battle for independence until it gained the support of all communities.
Historian Peter Hardy sums up the importance of Jinnahs return to India in his rise to prominence.
No one foresaw the transformation of the arrogant, proud, cold blooded lawyer Jinnah, into the
charismatic Muslim leader and his transformation of the League into a mass movement.
ESSAY 2
Describe the role played by the personality you have studied in national and/or international
history.
His rivals accused him of many a sin, his friends of a slight. But no one, friend or foe would ever
accuse Mohammed Ali Jinnah of a lack of willpower- Collins and Lapierre
Born 25th of December 1876, Mohammed Ali Jinnah a 20th century politician and statesman is
regarded as the father and founder of Pakistan. Jinnah is equally admired by his supporters and
opponents for his untiring efforts to unite Indian Muslims under the banner of Muslim League, his
constant endeavor to defend the Muslim culture, his visionary approach to the use of legal channels
and as a decisive figure for bringing about the end of British rule and partition of India.
Jinnahs principal role in Indian national history was the unification of Muslims for a collaborative
objective. In 1986 he joined the Indian National Congress and committed himself to politics and
bringing about independence. However in 1920 Jinnah left the party due to numerous clashes with
Gandhi, over the strategies employed by Congress such as non-violence through civil-disobedience.
Jinnahs strong leadership qualities and admiration acquired after the architecture of the Lucknow
pact allowed him to bring together Muslims from all of India.
As a committed leader of the League, Jinnah campaigned for Muslim rights and representation. In
1929 he proposed a constitutional reform plan known as the fourteen points which safeguarded the
political rights of Muslims in a self-governing India. Although the plan was rejected by Congress,
the League emerged as a competent party under new leadership. Thus Jinnahs role as an
ambassador for Hindu Muslim unity was reinforced by his grouping together of Muslims for a
common goal of a united India. In 1937, with the real possibility of an independent India, Jinnah
approached Gandhi and offered an alliance with Congress so that both parties would face the British
on a united front. Following the failure of these talks, Jinnah stated that the differences between
Hindus and Muslims are too great, the gap cannot be bridged, we must have pakistan.
After this, Jinnahs role in Indian national history would take on a different course. Instead of being
a strong advocate for Hindu Muslim unity, Jinnah became a decisive figure for the division of
people and a nation. After the 1940 Lahore conference, Pakistan was adopted as the main goal of
the party and Jinnah fought tirelessly for the partition of India. Mountbatten, last Governor General
of India states that he was a psychotic case, hell bent on his Pakistan. Historian Symonds takes a
different perspective on Jinnahs new role stating that he had worked himself to death, but had
contributed more than any other man to Pakistan's survival. Jinnahs new role in India was to
cause dire consequences for a state where the two religions of Hinduism and Islam had lived side by
side each other with little violence.
Those who are inspired by an ideal rather then self-interest make the biggest impact on history
To what extent does your study of Mohammed Ali Jinnah support this view?
From a devoted nationalist to the partition of a nation in Karachi,1947, Mohammed Ali Jinnah
changed the course of national and international history. As defined by the Oxford English
Dictionary, an ideal as an ultimate object or aim of endeavor of high or nobel characters. This
notion of idealism inspired Jinnah of a united India free from British rule. Jinnah took on the role of
HSC STUDY BUDDY
politician, innovator and leader in order to achieve this goal not only for himself, but for Muslims
all across India. From an in depth study of the personality of Jinnah, it is conclusive that those who
are inspired by an ideal rather then self-interest make the biggest impact on history.
1890, a young Jinnah at the gates of Lincons inn. Although his education had been relatively
narrow he remained captivated by his one great passion, the law. After returning to India, Jinnah
was inspired by the ideal of Hindu Muslim unity. He joined the Indian National Congress in 1986
and gave several speeches in hope of awakening India to the virtues of unity including its role in an
independent state. But with the coming of Mahatma Gandhi in 1919, everything changed. Jinnahs
ideal of unity was tested with the introduction of the the Rowlatt Bills. Historian McPherson asserts
that Jinnah was bitterly offended by the Bills which he regarded as against all the proclaimed
standards has British law and justice. As a strong advocate for British law systems Jinnah was now
placed in a position of doubt. Caught between two viewpoints he was angered by the anticonstitutional activity of the British whilst at the same time he could not accept the rejection of the
reform proposals which were coming from Congress. Jinnahs final break from Congress came at
Calcutta in 1928. Party member Nehru presented his own set on constitutional reform which
completely reject Muslim demands for separate electorates. Jinnah rejected Nehrus proposal and
was howled down by the Congress delegates. His inspirational ideal of Hindu Muslim unity now
shattered and subsequent distrust in Congress led Jinnah to withdraw from public life and relocation
to London.
Although Jinnah had split from Congress he was not yet ready to abandon his drive and passionate
ideal of Hindu Muslim unity. In 1936 the Muslim League held a special session in Bombay to
discuss the newly formed Government of India Act. This session was dominated by Jinnah who
proclaimed his nationalist sentiments and criticised the act as falling short of complete
independence. To underline his sense of nationalism he announced the formation of central and
provincial Muslim parliamentary board to nominate Muslim candidates for the 1937 elections. Such
candidates would co-operate with any groups, Muslim and non-Muslim. Jinnah was still offering an
olive branch of peace. After the 1937 elections Jinnah approached Gandhi and offered an alliance
with Congress. Historians Metcalf and Metcalf state that the failure of these talks led to Jinnahs
ultimate distrust of Congress and loss of ideal. His aim was to make the Muslim League the
undisputed party of all Indias Muslim and himself their sole spokesman. Jinnah was finally ready
to accept his defeat and move forward with his new goal of Muslim unity and representation. By the
early 1940s, Jinnah was moving fast with the concept of separatism. His new inspiration for the
need for separate states had placed him as the frontier for Muslim rights in India. Although Jinnahs
ultimate goal had changed notably he still was stimulated by the needs of the community rather then
his own self-interest. The Direct Action Day 1946 demonstrated Jinnahs decisive change in heart
and new ideal of an independent nation for Muslims in the form of Pakistan.
In the thirty years from Lucknow to Karachi, Mohammed Ali Jinnah had changed from a devoted
secular nationalist to the supreme communalist who destroyed the unity of India. His life was full of
ironies but perhaps the greatest of all was the the very concepts of legalism and fair play which
promoted Jinnah in 1916 still flourished within him during the 1940s. Although not as ambitious as
figures such as Gandhi, his love for his country and its people and the inspiration of a united,
independent India motivated Jinnah to not only unite a scattered religion but partition and shape a
new nation. This was the biggest impact on history.
Events shape people more than people shape events
How accurate is this statement in relation to Mohammed Ali Jinnah?
If a historian was to look at the events of the early 1900s, he or she would conclude that events that
took place including Gandhis policy of civil-disobedience, and the failure of talks post 1937
election shaped Jinnah and his ever changing policies towards Hindu Muslim unity. In stark
contrast, surveying the events of the 1940s would lead an historian to deduce that the actions taken
personally by Jinnah such as Jinnahs definitive personality during the Gandhi talks and the Direct
Action Day shaped the course of Indian history. With the creation of Pakistan, Jinnah not only
altered national history but transformed international history for years to come.
In March 1919, the British responded to mounting nationalist agitation by introducing the Rowlatt
Bills. Historian McPherson asserts that Jinnah was ofutraged by these bills and states Jinnahs first
move was to quietly withdraw from active participation in the Home Rule League and then to wait.
Whilst waiting, Jinnah saw the nationalist movement take a new direction which was to shape
Jinnahs attitude in years to come. A major turning event for Jinnah was the annual Congress
session in Nagpur where he denounced Gandhis program and spoke in favour of constitutionalism.
As Jinnahs warnings of the involvement of the masses had been ignored he had been pushed to the
limit of his patience with Congress. Historian Symonds states that he also viewed the involvement
of the poor, ill educated masses of the Khilafat movement with great distaste. After the Congress
session, Jinnah and a host of other moderates abandoned Congress and the ranks of the three
political organisations. As the disheartened Jinnah left for London, his clashes with Congress and
following distrust of Hindu leaders led to considerable resentment and questioning of his previous
commitment to Hindu Muslim unity.
The failure of the talks post 1937 elections was the second major event to shape Jinnahs goals and
perspectives. During his exile in Britain the leadership of the League was taken over by Sir
Mohammed Iqbal. Unlike the ambassador for Hindu Muslim unity, Iqbal had radical ideas about the
creation of a Homeland for Muslims in the form of Pakistan. But, when a group of students
proposed this new idea to Jinnah he was greatly angered as he claimed the British brought Hindu
Muslim unity to India and the League was trying to destroy it. Historian Akbar Ahmed suggests that
this event proves that although Jinnahs trust in Congress had been tested, Jinnah had not yet lost
faith in the possibility of a united India. The 1937 elections proved to the the final straw for Jinnah
and the ever expanding advent of communalism. Congresss claim to be the only representative
nationalist party in the country and refusal to allow solely Muslim lead provinces left Jinnah feeling
felt alienated led him to become a determined opponent of Congress and its policies. This event
propelled him to believe that Hindu Muslim unity could not be achieved due to the stubborn and
uncompromising nature of Congress.
By the late 1930s Jinnah was fast moving towards a concept of separatism. As Jinnah had been
guided down a new path of Muslim unity by the events of the early 1900s, he was now ready to
shape his own future and the fate of Muslims living in India. Throughout 1946, the newly elected
British Labour government headed by Attlee attempted to weave its way through the maze of Indian
politics but was constantly thwarted by the suboreneess of the League and Congress. Elections for a
constituent Assembly were called and the League won 76 of the 79 Muslim seats but Congress still
held a majority. Exasperated, Jinnah withdrew from all negotiations and decided on an exhibition of
Muslim strength. August 16th 1946 Jinnah declared a Direct Action Day and set off a series of
communal riots which claimed tens of thousands of lives. We do not want war, if you want war we
accept your offer unhesitatingly. We shall have India divided or we shall have India destroyed.
This event clearly demonstrates Jinnahs leadership role and willingness to act upon and shape the
course of Indias history.
Mohammed Ali Jinnah was a man who not only shaped Indias history but was shaped by it. With
the title Ambassador for Hindu Muslim unity, Jinnah set out to marry the two conflicting nations
under a united India. It was only when he met opposition from Congress on fundamental ideals that
HSC STUDY BUDDY
he began to campaign for a separate state for Muslims. In the words of Jinnah, Think 100 times
before you take a decision, but once that decision is taken, stand by its as one man.
ESSAY 3
"Originally Jinnah supported the creation of a united India but gradually came to believe that a
separate Muslim state was a necessity." In light of this statement, explain why Jinnah changed his
political views.
In examining Jinnahs conversion from the ambassador for Hindu-Muslim unity to the
figurehead for a separate Muslim state, there was no definitive turning point. Rather, there
was an emergence of altered beliefs accompanying contributing events which cause
Jinnahs different belief structure.
Pre-1919, Jinnah was the advocate for religious unity as the basis for purna swaraj,
however he had always acknowledged that the Muslim minority was at a disadvantage. He
was part of the Viceroys Executive Council and thereby was able to use his position to
further the Muslim cause for equal rights, however resigned this position of power soon
after the Amritsar massacre of 1919.
There had, indeed, been an All-India Muslim League which intended to protect the rights of
the minority, however in reality, this League were neither well-known nor an effective
political force. Jinnahs return in 1924 to revitalise the League meant that not only did the
League begin to function well as a political force, but it became the main rival to the Indian
Congress in Indian national politics.
Apart from the Rowlatt Acts, another direct result of British imperialism post-WW2
was the Khilafat issue. By removing the sacred Turkish Khalif from power, he was no
longer able to protect the three holiest of Muslim places, Mecca, Edina and Jerusalem.
This angered Muslims all around the world, not least of all in India where this British
tyranny had been witnessed for years.
This was clearly one event which highlighted the intense cultural difficulties between
Muslims and Hindis. Although united by a common hatred for the British during this time,
the cultural and religious differences were sufficient to pave the way for later communal
conflict. At first, the Non-Cooperation Movement, fuelled by Gandhi, united the Muslim
Khilafat issue and the Hindus affected by the Rowlatt Acts, to become an effective
motivator for change. However, the collapse of the Khilafat movement when Ataturk made
Turkey a republic meant that Muslims were now lacking a cause to fight against the British
Raj.
The pent up frustration that followed led to communal rioting, an enormous setback to the
goals of religious unity. At this point, there was little positive spirit and direction in the
League and consequently, they were unable to focus on the Independence Movement. In
an effort to heal the rift between Hindus and Muslims, Jinnah formulated the Delhi-Muslim
Proposals, were essentially stated what Muslims hoped to gain in the new constitution.
The Congress had produced the Nehru Report in response to the Simon Commission,
which neglected to mention these proposal, and inevitably cause increased communal
tensions. Thus it soon became clear to Jinnah that religious unity was merely a dream and
the reality was the ugliness of communalism.
By 1930, Hindu-Muslim unity appeared all but dead, and although having lost faith in
politics for a short while, Jinnah bounced back with the 14 Points, a direct response to the
biased Nehru Report, again, with little success. It seemed that the majority of Hindus in the
Congress wanted nothing to do with Jinnahs constant push for Muslim equality.
A decisive turning point into Jinnahs belief system was when Iqbal called for the
establishment of an autonomous Islamic state in 1930, namely, Pakistan.
The growing Hindu nationalism turned into vicious communalism between feuding
neighbour towns with the Communal Award of 1932, which granted reserved seats for
Muslims. Riots broke out overnight, led by the mortified Hindu population and Jinnahs
dream of a unified India came to an abrupt end. Since he had always supported Muslim
rights, he thenceforth became a dedicated advocate for a separate Pakistan, which
although not the ideal solution, seemed the only feasible one.
1935 saw the return of Jinnah from London to take hold of the Muslim League once more
and the spread the emancipation movement for the Muslims. Communalism itself revived
in 1937 after the Hindu success in the provincial elections. The elections of 1937 saw the
Hindu majority beat the Muslim minority staggeringly, (no surprise there) but the chain
reaction of these elections is perhaps the more interesting historical fact. After the Hindu
success, as Jinnah saw it, Muslims were effectively placed under Hindu power in the
provinces, Hindu dictatorship taking over, with the Hindu national flag flying for buildings,
children being made to salute Gandhi and they national language, Hindi, being taught
everywhere. These politically oppressive techniques infuriated the Muslim population, as
their religious customs and culture were not recognized and thus as a result, they were
ostracised by the empowered Hindus.
It was the effect of the 1937 elections that helped Jinnah see that Hindu-Muslim unity was
a futile attempt, and this served to fuel his attempts at spreading the Muslim Indian
nationalism, or the nationalism for a new Pakistan. "Originally Jinnah supported the creation
of a united India but gradually came to believe that a separate Muslim state was a necessity."