Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 26 June 2014
Accepted 29 December 2014
Available online 7 January 2015
The strain rates for the Borborema Province, located in northeastern Brazil, were estimated in this study.
For this purpose, we used GNSS tracking stations with a minimum of two years data. The data were
processed using the software GIPSY, version 6.2, provided by the JPL of the California Institute of
Technology. The PPP method was used to process the data using the non-ducial approach. Satellite
orbits and clock were supplied by the JPL. Absolute phase center offsets and variations for both the
receiver and the satellite antennaes were applied, together with ambiguity resolution; corrections of the
rst and second order effects of the ionosphere and troposphere models adopting the VMF1 mapping
function; 10 elevation mask; FES2004 oceanic load model and terrestrial tide WahrK1 PolTid FreqDepLove OctTid. From a multi annual solution, involving at least 2 years of continuous data, the coordinates
and velocities as well as their accuracies were estimated. The strain rates were calculated using the
Delaunay triangulation and the Finite Element Method. The results show that the velocity direction is
predominantly west and north, with maximum variation of 4.0 1.5 mm/year and 4.1 0.5 mm/year for
the x and y components, respectively. The highest strain values of extension and contraction were
0.109552 106 3.65 1010/year and 0.072838 106 2.32 1010/year, respectively. In general,
the results show that the highest strain and variation of velocity values are located close to the Potiguar
Basin, region that concentrates seismic activities of magnitudes of up to 5.2 mb. We conclude that the
contraction direction of strain is consistent with the maximum horizontal stress derived from focal
mechanism and breakout data. In addition, we conclude that the largest strain rates occur around the
Potiguar Basin, an area already recognized as one of the major sites of seismicity in intraplate South
America.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Borborema Province
Geodetic network
South American plate
Surface strains
1. Introduction
Several studies involving deformation analysis of the earth
surface using geodetic observations have been conducted to understand the dynamics of the strain applied to intraplate regions.
Among them, Li et al. (2001) established a model of rigid motion,
elasticeplastic and strain for eight intraplate blocks and peripheral
areas in China. The model was consistent with the strain parameters, obtained using geological and geophysical methods. Calais
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: marotta@unb.br (G.S. Marotta).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2014.12.006
0895-9811/ 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
G.S. Marotta et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58 (2015) 1e8
G.S. Marotta et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58 (2015) 1e8
(SIRGAS). Its denition follows that of IERS ITRS and its realization
are compatible with those of the ITRF (IERS Terrestrial Reference
Frame).
The geodetic points of RGP (Fig. 2) were deployed for tectonic
studies around the Potiguar Basin, in locations that present recurrent seismic activity, different lithological types and near active
shear zones.
4. Estimating coordinates and velocities vectors for the
points of the geodetic network
In this work, daily coordinate were estimated for each selected
point in the study area for the period between 2004 and 2010 and,
subsequently, these values were combined into a single solution of
coordinates and velocities for a preset period of time. For this,
version 6.2 of the GIPSY software, provided by the JPL of the California Institute of Technology, was used (<https://gipsy-oasis.jpl.
nasa.gov/>, 2012).
The Precise Point Positioning (PPP) method (Zumberge et al.,
1997; Monico, 2000) by using the module written in Perl called
gd2p.pl (GPS Data 2 Position) was used to process the daily GPS
data. The individual solutions were combined to provide the coordinates and velocities of each station. The Reference Frame used
was IGS 2008 and the reference epoch for the coordinates estimation was 2008.0.
The processing strategy involved to treat the errors that originated in the satellites, atmosphere, local environment, as well as
from the characteristics of the station, antenna and receiver, according to the error source classication described by Seeber
(2003) and Monico (2008). Among the information used to correct the aforementioned errors, it should be cited: the use of precise
orbits (non-ducial) and clocks; absolute phase center offsets and
variations for both the receiver and the satellite antennaes, provided by IGS (International GNSS Service); ambiguity resolution;
correction of the rst and second order effects of the ionosphere
and troposphere model adopting the VMF1 (Vienna Mapping
Function 1); 10 elevation mask; FES2004 oceanic load model and
terrestrial tide WahrK1 PolTid FreqDepLove OctTid.
In order to determine the strain the tridimensional geocentric
Cartesian system (X, Y, Z) was transformed to the geocentric
geodetic system (l, f, h) and, from this to the local geodetic system
(x, y, z), following methodology described by Monico (2008).
The coordinates of the geocentric geodetic system were used
both for forming triangular connections between the geodetic
points, using the Delaunay triangulation, and for dening the origins of the local geodetic system, given by the centroid position of
each triangle.
Once the origin and points that make up each triangle were
dened, which is called the network, the tridimensional coordinates in the local geodetic system were calculated.
G.S. Marotta et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58 (2015) 1e8
S0 S
Dt$S
(2)
E1
q
2
2
1
exx eyy
exx eyy 2$exy
2
(3)
E2
q
2
2
1
exx eyy
exx eyy 2$exy
2
(4)
b arctan
exy
E1 exy
(5)
To estimate the accuracy of each step, the Covariance Propagation Law for a given general model Y F(X) was used (Gemael,
1994; Marotta et al., 2013b):
CY J$CX $J T
(6)
(1)
Table 1
Period of GPS data used.
Geodetic point
GPS data
2004
ALAR
BRFT
CGPT
CHPT
CRAT
PBCG
PEPE
PISR
RECF
RNMO
RNNA
TGPT
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
G.S. Marotta et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58 (2015) 1e8
Table 2
Positions and velocities (V) of the geodetic stations, in m/year.
Geodetic point
ALAR
BRFT
CGPT
CHPT
CRAT
PBCG
PEPE
PISR
RECF
RNMO
RNNA
TGPT
Geodetic coordinates
l ( )
f ( )
h (m)
Vx (m/yr)
sVx (m/yr)
Vy (m/yr)
sVy (m/yr)
Vz (m/yr)
sVz (m/yr)
36.653420
38.425538
37.301461
38.299572
39.415606
35.907138
40.506124
42.702759
34.951517
37.325465
35.207708
38.040481
9.749223
3.877446
5.806386
4.418423
7.238017
7.213676
9.384417
9.030692
8.050962
5.204233
5.836139
5.919480
266.20249
21.66479
108.95806
26.45550
436.02616
534.07148
369.08498
366.78415
20.11785
23.36422
45.94238
158.46580
0.00342
0.00396
0.00387
0.00577
0.00174
0.00450
0.00362
0.00576
0.00420
0.00322
0.00358
0.00472
0.00039
0.00022
0.00110
0.00152
0.00018
0.00037
0.00036
0.00064
0.00017
0.00051
0.00049
0.00084
0.01171
0.01129
0.01282
0.00975
0.01169
0.01164
0.01222
0.01159
0.01213
0.01382
0.01167
0.01301
0.00016
0.00007
0.00039
0.00051
0.00006
0.00014
0.00014
0.00026
0.00007
0.00018
0.00018
0.00030
0.00024
0.00078
0.00449
0.00152
0.00125
0.00118
0.00070
0.00895
0.00631
0.00434
0.00044
0.00275
0.00042
0.00023
0.00116
0.00160
0.00019
0.00040
0.00037
0.00064
0.00018
0.00054
0.00054
0.00088
The results (Table 2 and Fig. 3) show that the velocity direction is
predominantly west and north with maximum variation of
4.0 1.5 mm/year and 4.1 0.5 mm/year for the x and y components, respectively. This variation was observed between the points
CHPT and CRAT and the points CHPT and RNMO, where one of them
is located on the edge of the Potiguar Basin, near the shear zones
Senador Pompeu, and in regions with higher seismic intensities.
In the vertical component, the maximum velocity variation of
15.3 0.7 mm/year was observed between the points PISR and
RECF. These points are close to Pernambuco Lineament.
Assuming that all these variations are due to local and regional
tectonic strains, the component values of the strain rate were
calculated (Table 3 and Fig. 4), where the inuence of the strains on
the continental crust, more precisely on the Earth surface can be
Fig. 3. Planimetric velocities (V) of the geodetic stations, in mm/year, estimated in the ITRF08 reference frame.
G.S. Marotta et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58 (2015) 1e8
Table 3
Strain rates and principal strain components in planimetry.
Network of points triangulated Geodetic coordinates of the barycenter of each network Planimetric analysis
Principal components of strain
l( )
s( )
36.986237
40.874830
40.181301
38.713572
38.585220
38.016858
38.858383
37.888506
37.325388
36.611545
37.555802
37.787742
35.837358
36.138769
37.083027
35.355454
4.972606
8.551042
6.715385
5.177962
5.858640
4.500034
8.790552
5.180712
8.066972
5.615586
5.643366
6.790391
8.337954
6.285401
6.313181
7.033593
0.001554
0.011144
0.019700
0.017737
0.005518
0.109552
0.003405
0.024608
0.000092
0.015327
0.015519
0.011791
0.000844
0.002676
0.012419
0.007046
seen. The values of strain rate and the values of standard deviation
are expressed as 106/year.
In Table 3, the region formed by the geodetic points RNMO, BRFT
and CHPT shows the highest strain value of extension, with
0.109552 106/year 3.65 1010/year, while the geodetic points
CHPT, BRFT and CRAT show the highest strain value of contraction,
with 0.072838 106/year 2.32 1010/year. In general, the
results in Table 3 and Fig. 5 show that the highest strain values are
located near the Potiguar Basin, region that concentrates seismic
0.000005
0.000005
0.000018
0.000045
0.000021
0.000365
0.000005
0.000044
0.000004
0.000041
0.000034
0.000025
0.000010
0.000015
0.000143
0.000015
0.039037
0.003966
0.002906
0.072838
0.021433
0.008175
0.003518
0.018514
0.007190
0.001044
0.008622
0.009352
0.001325
0.001913
0.001553
0.003423
0.000076
0.000013
0.000003
0.000232
0.000045
0.000007
0.000005
0.000018
0.000005
0.000008
0.000117
0.000007
0.000006
0.000022
0.000040
0.000004
41.953116
15.517682
10.571091
26.967033
30.090746
48.698127
83.647887
41.743309
47.941522
15.630026
10.969766
19.860865
2.679201
2.261410
34.313603
48.199594
sb ( )
0.140363
0.075426
0.019565
0.152550
0.092771
0.177530
0.107769
0.118347
0.166972
0.263421
0.304666
0.019034
0.329224
0.323240
0.716995
0.101697
G.S. Marotta et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58 (2015) 1e8
Fig. 5. Principal components of strain rates estimated by geodetic observations and strains by focal mechanisms and breakouts.
Province, strain rate values are smaller for both extension and
contraction. It is, therefore, suggested that these small values are
associated with the low density of geodetic points and low concentration of seismic activity.
The principal components of strain rates were, for purpose of
result verication, compared to stress directions estimated by
inversion of focal mechanisms and breakouts (Fig. 5) compiled from
~o (1992, 1998), Coblentz and Richardson (1996), Lima
Assumpa
et al. (1997), Ferreira et al. (1998, 2008), Frana et al. (2004),
Bezerra et al. (2007, 2011) and Lopes et al. (2010a).
Fig. 5 shows that the directions of the strains estimated by
geodetic observations are in agreement with the stress directions
estimated by other instrumental methods, except in places with
lower density of geodetic points. However, it is suggested that the
geodetic network, independent of density, can present regional
strains, which in turn, may bring insight on how strain and stresses
interactions occur in regions with or without seismic activity. This
can be conrmed by the good agreement between strain directions
of the principal component of strain rates aligned with the ductile
shear zones within the study site, as shown in Fig. 4, where we can
suggest present-day fault reactivation.
7. Conclusion
Based on the coordinates estimated from GPS data and using the
Delaunay triangulation and Finite Element Method, the strain rates
of the geodetic network located in the Borborema Province were
estimated and compared with the stress directions estimated by
focal mechanisms and breakouts.
In the Potiguar Basin region, the vectors of the principal components of strain presented suggest a direct correlation with
seismic events by the behavior of the contractions and extensions
found in studies involving focal mechanisms and breakout.
G.S. Marotta et al. / Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58 (2015) 1e8
Province, intraplate South America integration of seismological and paleoseismological data. Tectonophysics 510, 269e290.
Bezerra, F.H.R., Takeya, M.K., Sousa, M.O.L., do Nascimento, A.F., 2007. Coseismic
reactivation of the Samambaia fault, Brazil. Tectonophysics 430, 27e39.
Calais, E., Han, J.Y., DeMets, C., Nocquet, J.M., 2006. Strain of the North American
plate interior from a decade of continuous GPS measurements. J. Geophys. Res.
111, B06402.
Cloetingh, S., Cornu, T., Ziegler, P.A., Beekman, F., 2006. Neotectonics and intraplate
continental topography of the northern Alpine Foreland. Earth-Sci. Rev. 74,
127e196.
Coblentz, D.D., Richardson, R.M., 1996. Analysis of the South American intraplate
stress eld. J. Geophys. Res. 101 (B4), 8643e8657.
taux, J.-F., Soudarin, L., Cazenave, A., Bouille
, F., 1998. Present-day tectonic plate
Cre
motions and crustal strains from the Doris space system. J. Geophys. Res. 103
(B12), 167e230.
de Castro, D.L., Bezerra, F.H.R., Sousa, M.O.L., Fuck, R.A., 2012. Inuence of Neoproterozoic tectonic fabric on the origin of the Potiguar Basin, northeastern
Brazil and its links with West Africa based on gravity and magnetic data.
J. Geodyn. 54, 29e42.
Deniz, I., Ozener, H., 2010. Estimation of strain accumulation of densication
network in northern Marmara Region, Turkey. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 10,
2135e2143.
, J.M., Frana, G.S., 2008.
Ferreira, J.M., Bezerra, F.H.R., Sousa, M.O.L., Nascimento, A.F., Sa
The role of Precambrian mylonitic belts and present-day stress eld in the
coseismic reactivation of the Pernambuco lineament. Tectonophysics 456,111e126.
Ferreira, J.M., Oliveira, R.T., Takeya, M.K., Assump~
ao, M., 1998. Superposition of
local and regional stresses in northeast Brazil: evidence from focal mechanisms
around the Potiguar marginal basin. Geophys. J. Int. 134, 341e355.
-ce. Rev.
Frana, G.S., Ferreira, J.M., Takeya, M.K., 2004. Seismic activity in senador sa
Bras. Geof. 22 (2), 115e125.
~o ao Ajustamento de Observaes e Aplicaes Geode
sicas.
Gemael, C., 1994. Introdua
Editora UFPR.
Heidbach, O., Tingay, M., Barth, A., Reinecker, J., Kurfe, D., Mller, B., 2009. The
World Stress Map Based on the Database Release 2008, Equatorial Scale 1:
46,000,000. Commission for the Geological Map of the World.
Li, Y.-X., Huang, C., Hu, X.-K., Shuai, P., Hu, X.-G., Zhang, Z.-F., 2001. Model of rigid
and elasticeplastic motion in intraplate blocks and strain status of principal
blocks in Chinese mainland. Acta Seismol. Sin. 14 (6), 603e610.
~o, M., 1997. Stress orientations in Brazilian
Lima, C., Nascimento, E., Assumpa
sedimentary basins from breakout analysis: implications for force models in the
South American plate. Geophys. J. Int. 130, 112e124.
Lima, C.C., 2000. Ongoing compression across intraplate South America: observations and some implications for petroleum exploitation and exploration. Rev.
^nc. 30 (1), 203e207.
Bras. Geocie
Lopes, A.V., Assump~
ao, M., Zevallos, I.A., 2010a. Intraplate stress patterns in Brazil
with recent focal mechanism studies: predominance of mid-continent
compressional stresses and exural effects at the continental margin. In: AGU
Meeting of the Americas.
Lopes, A.E.V., Assump~
ao, M., Nascimento, A.F., Ferreira, J.M., Menezes, E.A.S.,
Barbosa, J.R., 2010b. Intraplate earthquake swarm in Belo Jardim, NE Brazil:
reactivation of a major Neoproterozoic shear zone (Pernambuco Lineament).
Geophys. J. Int. 180, 1303e1312.
Marotta, G.S., Frana, G.S., Monico, J.F.G., Fuck, R.A., 2013a. Strains arising by seismic
events in the SIRGAS-CON network region. J. Geod. Sci. 3 (1), 12e21.
Marotta, G.S., Frana, G.S., Monico, J.F.G., Fuck, R.A., Arajo Filho, J.O., 2013b. Strain
rate of the South American lithospheric plate by SIRGAS-CON geodetic observations. J. South Am. Earth Sci. 47, 136e141.
~o utilizando o gps:
Monico, J.F.G., 2000. Posicionamento por ponto de alta precisa
^mica. Rev. Bras. Geof. 18 (1), 39e48.
Uma solu~
ao para a geodina
Monico, J.F.G., 2008. Posicionamento pelo GNSS: Descri~
ao, Fundamentos e
~es, second ed. Editora UNESP.
Aplicao
Norabuena, E., Lefer-Grifn, L., Mao, A., Dixon, T., Stein, S., Sacks, I.S., Ocola, L.,
Ellis, M., 1998. Space geodetic observations of NazcaeSouth America convergence across the central Andes. Science 229, 358.
es, A.M., Valeriano, M.M., AndradesRossetti, D.F., Bezerra, F.H.R., Betard, F., Go
Filho, C.O., Mittani, J.C.R., Tatumi, S.H., Neves, B.B.B., 2011. Late Quaternary
sedimentation in the Paraiba basin, northeastern Brazil: landform, sea level and
tectonics in eastern South America passive margin. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol.
Palaeoecol. 300, 191e204.
Seeber, G., 2003. Satellite Geodesy. de Gruyter, Berlin.
Takeya, M.K., Ferreira, J.M., Pearce, R.G., Assump~
ao, M., Costa, J.M., Sophia, C.M.,
1989. The 1986e1988 intraplate earthquake sequence near Jo~
aoo C^
amara,
northeast Brazil e evolution of seismicity. Tectonophysics 167, 117e131.
Turcotte, D.L., Schubert, G., 2002. Geodynamics, second ed. Cambridge University
Press.
Zoback, M.L., 1992. First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: the
world stress map project. J. Geophys. Res. 97 (B8), 11703e11728.
Zumberge, J.F., Hein, M.B., Jefferson, D.C., Watkins, M.M., Webb, F.H., 1997. Precise
point positioning for the efcient and robust analysis of gps data from large
networks. J. Geophys. Res. 102 (B3), 5005e5017.