Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Executive Summary
A competitive talent acquisition program is crucial to attract and retain
skilled workers. But a shortage of skilled talent in the workforce, and
changing demographics within the organization, is making it increasingly
difficult to align the skills on hand with the business at hand.
That is putting greater pressure on finding so-called passive candidates in
the market. It is also forcing organizations to better assess how they screen
applications for the right fit in the organization, to be sure the right people
are being brought on board.
Research Benchmark
Aberdeens Research
Benchmarks provide an indepth and comprehensive look
into process, procedure,
methodologies, and
technologies with best practice
identification and actionable
recommendations
Best-in-Class Performance
Aberdeen used four key performance criteria to distinguish Best-in-Class
companies:
Quality of hire
Overall program satisfaction of hiring managers
Time-to-hire
New hire retention
Required Actions
In addition to the specific recommendations in Chapter Three of this
report, to achieve Best-in-Class performance, companies must:
Table of Contents
Executive Summary....................................................................................................... 2
Best-in-Class Performance..................................................................................... 2
Competitive Maturity Assessment....................................................................... 2
Required Actions...................................................................................................... 2
Chapter One: Benchmarking the Best-in-Class ..................................................... 4
Aberdeen's Analysis................................................................................................. 4
The Maturity Class Framework............................................................................ 5
The Best-in-Class PACE Model ............................................................................ 6
Best-in-Class Strategies........................................................................................... 7
Chapter Two: Benchmarking Requirements for Success .................................... 9
Competitive Assessment......................................................................................11
Capabilities and Enablers......................................................................................12
Chapter Three: Required Actions .........................................................................17
Laggard Steps to Success......................................................................................17
Industry Average Steps to Success ....................................................................18
Best-in-Class Steps to Success ............................................................................19
Appendix A: Research Methodology.....................................................................21
Appendix B: Related Aberdeen Research............................................................23
Figures
Figure 1: Top Pressures for All Organizations....................................................... 4
Figure 2: Metrics Used to Determine Quality of Hire......................................... 9
Figure 3: Utilizing Assessments in Recruiting .......................................................14
Tables
Table 1: Top Performers Earn Best-in-Class Status.............................................. 6
Table 2: The Best-in-Class PACE Framework ....................................................... 6
Table 3: Strategies for Improving Recruitment Efforts ........................................ 7
Table 4: The Competitive Framework...................................................................11
Table 5: The PACE Framework Key ......................................................................22
Table 6: The Competitive Framework Key ..........................................................22
Table 7: The Relationship Between PACE and the Competitive Framework
.........................................................................................................................................22
Chapter One:
Benchmarking the Best-in-Class
Aberdeen's Analysis
If job seekers sometimes feel that hiring managers wouldn't know a good
candidate if they saw one, they might be right. At least that is among the key
findings of Aberdeen Group's latest research on talent acquisition strategies.
Unfortunately, the picture isn't new. In the June 2007 report, The Global War
for Talent, Aberdeen reported that a large number of companies "either
don't know or don't measure how often they hire their top choice. Laggards
(the bottom 30% of organizations according to performance with talent
acquisition efforts) are focused primarily on current staffing needs, yet they
are 60% more likely not to be able to address current skills needs."
Fast Fact
Anecdotal evidence reveals that
if an organization can't properly
assess if it is hiring the right
people, it may often not be and that can put hiring
managers into a cycle of
constant turnover and rehiring.
Fast forward to 2008 and the message is more of the same. Indeed, when
organizations were asked for this report to select from among 24
capabilities they have in place currently to support their talent acquisition
efforts, the second lowest cited response was "clearly defined metrics to
measure the quality of a new hire." At the same time, managers cited quality
of hire metrics as the number one capability they would like to put in place.
Clearly there is a major disconnect for hiring managers in terms of
practicing what they preach.
88%
83%
80%
60%
40%
20%
14%
11%
Globalization
Compliance
requirements
0%
Competition for
skilled labor
Shortage of
desired skills
Quality of hire
Time-to-hire
Best-in-Class:
Top 20% of
aggregate
performance scorers
Industry Average:
Middle 50% of
aggregate
performance scorers
Laggard:
Bottom 30% of
aggregate
performance scorers
Actions
Capabilities
Enablers
Competition
for skilled
labor
Shortage of
desired skills
Enhance company
brand and reputation
in recruiting market
Proactively search
for and communicate
with potential
candidates
Market through new
means (e.g. social
networking sites) to
reach passive
candidates
Background checking
tools
Applicant tracking tools
Company career portal
Employee referrals
tracking tools
Assessment tools for
knowledge and skills
Online learning portals
Assessment tools for
attitude, and / or
behavioral attributes
Best-in-Class Strategies
Hiring managers are learning that effective talent requisition efforts require
a new way of approaching the recruiting process. This includes greater
emphasis on the company's brand as a recruiting tool, and the use of new
Internet-based technologies. The reasons are clear, according to survey
participants: to increase the organization's appeal as a best place to work,
and to connect with passive job candidates (those potential hires that are
not actively job searching).
Table 3: Strategies for Improving Recruitment Efforts
Best-inClass
All
Others
35%
38%
32%
37%
30%
29%
29%
31%
26%
23%
Strategy
While the high level strategies that organizations are adopting are similar,
Best-in-Class organizations are placing greater emphasis on ensuring
collaboration between hiring managers and recruiters on what skills,
attributes, and attitudes are desired in a candidate, cited by 89% of Best-inClass companies.
In addition, Best-in-Class organizations are more aggressive at
communicating job openings and job role needs with current staff. This is
especially important, since employee referrals are cited as the top source
for finding desirable talent (a focus of 82% of the Best-in-Class). The Best-inClass are also more likely to use the corporate website as a tool for
showcasing the company's culture and opportunities (cited by 79% of the
Best-in-Class).
Other top strategies and capabilities of Best-in-Class include:
Mapping desired skill sets against job applicants and candidates, cited
by 71%
Chapter Two:
Benchmarking Requirements for Success
A successful talent acquisition program involves far more than deciding what
skills and attributes are needed from candidates and finding new sources for
them. It also involves the ability to measure and assess how well new hires
perform in their roles during the first year on the job. This is where quality
of hire is really determined.
Fast Facts
75% of all organizations cite
employee referrals as the
most successful recruiting
activity
69% of all organizations cite
online job boards as the
second most effective means
of recruiting
69%
65%
56%
51%
60%
52%
39%
40%
44%
38%
20%
0%
Time-to-productivity
Best-in-Class
Average
Candidate's first
performance review
rating
Laggard
Competitive Assessment
Aberdeen Group analyzed the aggregated metrics of surveyed companies to
determine whether their performance ranked as Best-in-Class, Industry
Average, or Laggard. In addition to having common performance levels, each
class also shared characteristics in five key categories: (1) process (the
approaches they take to execute their daily operations); (2) organization
(corporate focus and collaboration among stakeholders); (3) knowledge
management (contextualizing data and exposing it to key stakeholders);
(4) technology (the selection of appropriate tools and effective
deployment of those tools); and (5) performance management (the
ability of the organization to measure their results to improve their
business). These characteristics (identified in Table 4) serve as a guideline
for best practices, and correlate directly with Best-in-Class performance
across the key metrics.
Table 4: The Competitive Framework
Best-in-Class
Process
Average
Laggards
66%
52%
Knowledge
48%
36%
43%
31%
Organization
46%
35%
49%
33%
Telephone: 617 723 7890
Fax: 617 723 7897
Best-in-Class
Technology
Performance
Average
Laggards
Process
A vital part of a successful talent acquisition strategy is in knowing where an
organization obtains the best quality job candidates, so that priority can be
given to expanding and managing efforts from those sources. As indicated
2008 Aberdeen Group.
www.aberdeen.com
earlier, the top source for desired talent is referrals from current
employees.
This makes sense, since current employees know both the individuals they
refer, and the culture and work ethic of the organization. Existing
employees can predetermine if an associate is likely to have the necessary
background and skills to succeed in a job, to know the individual's work
style, and to predict if they would fit in well with the employer's corporate
culture.
The good news is that a majority (74%) of Best-in-Class organizations
understand this, and routinely assesses the recruiting results obtained from
all of the various media and outlets they use, including the top source of
employee referrals. Critical to the process is the ability to map desired skill
sets against job applicants and candidates, a capability currently cited by 63%
of the Best-in-Class.
Having found potential hires, the Best-in-Class are also far more aggressive
in pre-screening candidates to ensure they are the right person for the job.
This includes prescreening candidates for technical competencies (cited by
70% of Best-in-Class) and for cultural fit (cited by 63% of Best-in-Class).
Organization
In addition to looking outside the organization, success with a talent
acquisition program requires inward action and reflection. Bringing new
employees on board will be of little value if they don't want to stick around.
In response, Best-in-Class organizations are putting more emphasis on
career development, leadership training, and flexible work environments.
The goals are to be more attractive to potential hires, and more caring of
existing staff.
Indeed, a top priority for Best-in-Class organizations is to promote career
development and professional growth opportunities in recruiting campaigns
(cited by 68% of the Best-in-Class).
Also important is the effort to be responsive to individual worker needs.
While such workplace benefits as flexible schedules, telecommuting and job
sharing are not practical for all organizations, they are becoming more
commonplace. Currently, 51% of Best-in-Class organizations indicate they are
promoting flexible job schedules as a cultural benefit to help lure candidates.
Aiding in all of the aforementioned steps is the greater emphasis that Bestin-Class organizations place on fostering collaboration between line
managers, marketing, and recruiting, to ensure that all are promoting the
same message of the company as a best place to work.
Knowledge Management
As discussed previously, organizations use a variety of metrics to measure
the effectiveness of their talent acquisition strategy. These include such
Technology
Not surprisingly, a strong majority of all organizations use background
checking tools and applicant tracking tools. The Best-in-Class are 50% more
likely than Laggard organizations to use employee referral tracking tools.
This is an important distinction, given that employee referrals are the
primary source for obtaining desired talent.
Despite the fact that nearly two-thirds of all organizations use skills
assessments in the recruiting process, the Best-in-Class are 56% more likely
than all other organizations to understand the measurable impact of their
use. Still uncommon is the use of assessment tools for attitudes and
behavioral attributes, despite the fact that there is growing interest in
prescreening candidates for these traits (see information presented in
Chapter Three).
Figure 3: Utilizing Assessments in Recruiting
50%
40%
30%
39%
37%
25%
35%
38%
27%
20%
10%
0%
Measuring the impact of
We use assessments in
We do not currently use
assessments used in
the hiring process but have assessments in the hiring
evaluating candidates is
difficulty determining the
process
central to our overall hiring business impact from their
process
usage
Best-in-Class
All Others
Source: Aberdeen Group, July 2008
Performance Management
Among the most telling statistics from the recent talent acquisition survey is
the percentage of hires that organizations indicate were the top choice for
the job role in 2007. One-third of all organizations participating in the
survey either don't know that percentage, or don't measure it. However,
forty-four percent (44%) of Best-in-Class organizations, indicated that they
hire their top choice more than 75% of the time compared to 31% of the
Industry Average and only 18% of Laggard organizations.
Based on this information, not surprisingly, the majority of all organizations
(63%) indicating that their talent acquisition strategy is only somewhat
effective. Views on the performance of talent acquisition systems are also a
mixed bag; with only 43% of all organizations indicated they are somewhat or
very satisfied with their system for managing the talent acquisition program.
This ranges from 55% for Best-in-Class organizations to 30% for Laggard
organizations.
Chapter Three:
Required Actions
Whether a company is trying to move its performance in talent acquisition
from Laggard to Industry Average, or Industry Average to Best-in-Class, the
following actions will help spur the necessary performance improvements:
Fast Facts
20% of all organizations are
just beginning to explore the
use of Web 2.0 technologies
as a means of locating and
communicating with passive
job candidates
14% of all organizations
occasionally use Web 2.0
technologies in their
recruiting efforts
Two-thirds (66%) of all organizations indicate that they will increase their
talent acquisition efforts over the next 12 months. That will put even
greater pressure on current efforts to find and retain talent.
There are clear lessons in the survey data on which organizations will be
more successful in those efforts, and those lessons center around clearly
defined goals and expectations from a talent acquisition strategy. The key
to success is that an organization has clearly defined common behaviors
and skills of the top performers on staff. This will enable hiring managers
to seek the skills and attitudes in job candidates most likely to match
those behaviors.
New hires should be interviewed after the job offer, to obtain feedback
on the recruiting and hiring process, to make improvements to the
process as needed.
Clearly defined metrics should be in place to measure the quality of new
hires as they meet milestones through the first year on the job, to
evaluate how well they perform to expectation, and fit in with the
company culture.
Hiring managers and recruiters need to be trained in the use of new
technologies to find passive job candidates. Such workers can be a vital
source of talent and expertise, but have traditionally been invisible to
recruiting efforts. That must change, and talent acquisition programs
need to embrace new means and methods of engaging elusive, but vital,
talent in the workforce.
Finally, the entire organization should work together to collectively brand
the company as a best place to work. Recruiting should be seen as a staffwide function, not just the role of human resources. This is especially
important, since current employees are the most likely source for
desired new talent. If there truly are plenty more where they came from,
employees must have the desire not just the ability to help
employers make contact.
2008 Aberdeen Group.
www.aberdeen.com
Appendix A:
Research Methodology
Between June and July 2008, Aberdeen examined the use, the experiences,
and the intentions of more than 620 enterprises regarding their talent
acquisition initiatives.
Aberdeen supplemented this online survey effort with interviews with select
survey respondents, gathering additional information on recruitment
strategies, experiences, and results.
Responding enterprises included the following:
Study Focus
Responding HR executives and
practitioners completed an
online survey that included
questions designed to
determine the following:
The degree to which talent
acquisition technologies are
being utilized to track and
communicate with active
candidates and engage
passive candidates
The effectiveness of the
existing talent acquisition
program and system.
Current and planned use of
recruitment technology to
aid in talent acquisition
activities
The metrics used to
determine the quality of
hires
The study aimed to identify
emerging best practices for and
to provide a framework by
which readers could assess
their own talent acquisition
capabilities.
Solution providers recognized as sponsors were solicited after the fact and
had no substantive influence on the direction of this report. Their
sponsorship has made it possible for Aberdeen Group to make these
findings available to readers at no charge.
Appendix B:
Related Aberdeen Research
Related Aberdeen research that forms a companion or reference to this
report includes:
RPO: The Ins and Outs of Recruitment Process Outsourcing; March 2008
The Global War for Talent: Getting What You Want Won't Be Easy; June
2007