0 évaluation0% ont trouvé ce document utile (0 vote)
18 vues3 pages
The Jeu de Paume has been home to an exciting programme of temporary photography exhibitions. The second of its inaugural shows, L'Ombre du Temps, ran from September until November last year. The show felt refreshing, even controversial, in its healthy disdain for the hegemony historically exercised by the evolutionary narrative.
The Jeu de Paume has been home to an exciting programme of temporary photography exhibitions. The second of its inaugural shows, L'Ombre du Temps, ran from September until November last year. The show felt refreshing, even controversial, in its healthy disdain for the hegemony historically exercised by the evolutionary narrative.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
The Jeu de Paume has been home to an exciting programme of temporary photography exhibitions. The second of its inaugural shows, L'Ombre du Temps, ran from September until November last year. The show felt refreshing, even controversial, in its healthy disdain for the hegemony historically exercised by the evolutionary narrative.
Droits d'auteur :
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formats disponibles
Téléchargez comme PDF, TXT ou lisez en ligne sur Scribd
comprehensively. But did it really need to be? Sensitively performed,
such mid-career surveys might serve to extract fresh meaning, to ask new questions, unsettling the sense of a 'story-so-far' curation. Yet, after two floors and ten rooms of Dijkstra's by-now familiar pictures of teenage self-construction, the unquestioning nature of the show become frustrating. We know this work, we like this work, need we say anything more? The exhibition begins impressively, with sixteen of Dijkstra's early beach portraits installed here as an initiating moment, the first indication of the photographer's quiet awe and respect for the fragile self-images of her adolescent subjects. They stare down from the walls as though secular icons, hovering in twilight on symbolic shorelines, the masks of their adult identity only half- formed. In their haunting stasis the trauma of experience remains eternally and powerfully implicit, ushering us through to the second room where it is realised in the blood-stained, shirt-torn matadors and the assertive, delicate maternalism of Dijkstra's young mothers. Their natural juxtaposition of an anti-heroic bravado and a forceful femininity is played out across opposing walls, conjoined by the harrowing and melancholic presence of an Ukrainian orphan, who, battered but dignified and painfully beautiful, appears experienced before his time. These early rooms feel fresh, succeed in assembling an exhibitory narrative that moves and evolves, recognising a shifting perspective and the subtle dialogue which exists between these pictures. It is as the show progresses upstairs that a sense of conceptual and aesthetic inertia creeps in and it slowly dawns that a lot of this work is in fact very similar. This might not be a problem; numerous photographers have made their careers out of a similarly repetitious practice. Yet, it is the individuality of Dijkstra's subjects which are the staple of these photographs, rooted in an Arbusian Less than twenty years ago, Paris's Jeu de Paume was home to sensibility for a natural visual rebelliousness that refuses to be one of to the world's most impressive collections of Impressionist stifled by any attempt at physical conformity. We see it in the ill- painting. Now Monet, Degas and the rest have moved across the fitting uniforms of the young Israeli conscripts, in the bulging boob- Seine to the nearby Mus6e d'Orsay and the Jeu de Paume has tubes and greasy hair of the teenage Liverpudlian clubbers, and in opened its doors to a new crowd. Since lost June, its beautifully the bitter-faced twins which age and metomorphosise before us refurbished series of gallery spaces, which successfully tread the across a series of six photographs. But after four or five rooms a difficult line between white-walled minimalism and something saturation point is reached and a crucial, nebulous aspect of this warmer and more intimate, have been the residence of an exciting individuality is lost, distorted into the photographic motif through programme of temporary photography exhibitions; 'an innovative which we are invited to identify, not the particularity of the subject, global project... implemented in a resolutely contemporary spirit.' but the artistic vision of Rineke Dijkstra. This may have something The second of its inaugural shows, L'Ombre du Temps, ran from to do with marketability and the role of collectors and institutions September until November last year. Aself-conscious re-thinking of in dictating the terms of progress. It certainly makes for a coherent the photographic lineage proposed by Tate Modern's 2003 offering, show. It also raises the question of where this work can go from here? Cruel and Tender: The Real in Twentieth Century Photography, It will be interesting to witness the lasting consequences of the L'Ombre du Temps set out to highlight the perceived MOMA-centric exhibition, which tours to Amsterdam, Barcelona, and Winterthur, bias of the Tate's historical assembly, shifting its focus from the upon the development of an artist only recently turned forty-six. As broadly-defined schools of Dusseldorf and New York to position a consecrating exercise it will no doubt be successful, consolidating the camera in a more ambiguous relation to the real, through the Dijkstra's already established status as part of a contemporary work of Atget, Sekula, Sherman, Cahun and Rodchenko. The show photographic canon. It is yet to be seen whether it will also draw felt refreshing, even controversial, in its healthy disdain for the a line under a body of work which is beginning to feel stagnant or, hegemony historically exercised by the evolutionary narrative conversely, to permanently seal the photographer in the mould of which underscored Cruel and Tender. By comparison, its follow her early years. Either way, something has ended. - BEN BURBRIDGE up, a mid-career retrospective of the Dutch photographer Rineke Dijkstra, seems frustratingly uncritical in its stand-point. Whilst lacking the sort of inescapable public profile we might associate with, say, Andreas Gursky or Thomas Struth, Dijkstra is by no means a peripheral player on the contemporary photographic stage. Over the past ten years her work has been exhibited Above: Jolta, Ukraine, 30 July 1993 internationally in some of the world's most prestigious venues, Opposite: Tiergarten, Berlin, 27 June 1999 including both the Guggenheims, and Tate Modern, as part of Cruel and Tender. It is true that her portfolio has never been viewed in its Ben Burbridge works at Photoworks. He is currently studying for an MA in Art History at Sussex University. entirety, and there is a certain pleasure to be had here in revisiting her delicate studies of adolescent self-consciousness, their mute Rineke Dijkstra: Photographs and Videos, 1991 - 2004, Jeu de Paume, 14 December 2004 - 20 February 2005 admiration for the uncertain stumble towards adulthood. If this is The exhibition tours to the Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam, the Fotomuseum, Winterthur, and the La Caixa a vision well known, it has never been represented so Foundation, Barcelona. j•I COPYRIGHT INFORMATION
TITLE: Rineke Dijkstra: Photographs and Videos, 1991-2004
SOURCE: Photoworks Spr/Summ 2005
The magazine publisher is the copyright holder of this article and it
is reproduced with permission. Further reproduction of this article in violation of the copyright is prohibited. To contact the publisher: http://www.photoworksuk.org/