Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Energy in Thailand
Energy in Thailand refers to energy and electricity production, consumption, import
and export in Thailand. According to the Ministry of Energy, the country's primary
energy consumption was 75.2 Mtoe (million tonnes of oil equivalent) in 2013, an
increase of 2.6% over the previous year. According to British Petroleum, energy
consumption was 115.6 Mtoe in 2013.
75% of Thailand's electrical generation is powered by natural gas in 2014.
Thailand produces roughly one-third of the oil it consumes. It is the second largest
importer of oil in SE Asia. Thailand is a large producer of natural gas, with reserves
of at least 10 trillion cubic feet. After Indonesia, it is the largest coal producer in SE
Asia, but must import additional coal to meet domestic demand.
Electricity production
Ninety percent of Thai electrical generating capacity is conventional thermal. Oilfired plants have been replaced by natural gas, which as of 2014 powers 75% of
electrical generation. Coal-fired plants produce an additional 20%, with the
remainder from biomass, hydro, and biogas.
Thailand has no nuclear power plants. Plans to produce 5 gigawatts of electricity by
2025 using nuclear technology have been scaled back to 2 GW in the aftermath of
the Fukushima disaster.
Oil
50.4
Natural
Gas
47.0
Total
115.6
Oil
Production: Thailand first began producing oil in 1981, when it started producing
2,000 barrels (42 US gallons) per day. By 2013, daily production had increased to
459,000 barrels. Proved oil reserves are estimated at 0.4 thousand million barrels.
Consumption: Consumption in 2013 was 1.2 million barrels per day, a 2% increase
over the previous year.
Factories and power plants have been required to reduce emissions. Bangkok and
the rest of the Central Region contribute between 6070% of the countrys industrial
emissions. Most power plants rely on burning fossil fuels.[citation needed]
Other sources of air pollution include garbage burning, open cooking and
agricultural burning practices, including deliberate forest fires.
Agricultural burning in Southeast Asia often creates a haze. In 2003 Thailand ratified
the ASEAN Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution to reduce the haze from
forest fires, but issues throughout the region are still common.[5] Wildfires are
started by local farmers during the dry season in northern Thailand for a variety of
purposes,[6][7] with February and March as the two months when conditions are at
their worst.[8][9] In research conducted between 2005 and 2009 in Chiang Mai,
average PM10 rates during these months were found to be well above the country's
safety level of 120 g/m3,[10] peaking at 383 g/m3 on 14 March 2007.[11] They
are the main cause of the intense air pollution in the Thai highlands[12] and
contribute to the floods in the country by completely denuding the undergrowth of
the woods.[13] The dry forest soil leads to lower water intake for the trees to extract
when the rains arrive.[14]
Deforestation
Forest cover in Thailand has been greatly reduced as people convert forested land
to agriculture. Forest cover fell drastically from 53% in 1961 to 25% in 1998. During
the period 2001-2012, Thailand lost 1 million hectares of forest, while restoring
499,000 hectares.[15] Wetlands have been converted to rice paddies and urban
sprawl.[16] With a government measures in place to prohibit logging, deforestation
rates have dropped, but the impacts of deforestation are still being felt.[17]
Deforestation creates a host of environmental problems: soil erosion, sedimentation
of rivers, and loss of natural habitat. Wetlands and mangroves in coastal areas have
been seriously degraded by expansion of commercial fishing, shrimp aquaculture,
industry, and tourism, causing much of Thailand's biodiversity losses.[18] It is
estimated that Thailand in 1961 had 3,500 km2 of mangrove forests. By 2004 that
number was less than 2,000 km2 according to the Thai government.[19]
Field and forest burning
The burning of agricultural fields and forested areas is an yearly event, mainly in the
dry month of March, which has become increasingly more destructive and
widespread in the northern provinces of Thailand.
Fires occurring in that area fall into three main categories: forest fires, agricultural
burning, and roadside burning. Forest fires are deliberately set mainly for the
supposedly increased forest product yields, especially the earth star mushroom
(Astraeus hygrometricus (Pers.) Morgan, or "hed thob" or "hed phor" in Thai), which
has seasonal availability and a high market price.[20] In order to collect these fungi,
local farmers use fire either to clear the forest floor to make it easier to find the
mushroom or because fire is thought to stimulate the growth of this mushroom.
"Cheap and fast" is a shorthand explanation for the intentional use of fire to clear
agricultural fields, overgrown roadsides, and open areas. Cattle herders also burn
areas to stimulate the growth of Imperata grass which is able to quickly produce
new leaves during the hot-dry season. New leaves produced on burnt areas have a
higher nutrient value, which is perfect for cattle grazing. Roadside fires are set to
clear vegetation from encroaching on roadways. Fires produce large amounts of
smoke which stagnates low lying areas, causing eye irritation and respiratory
ailments. Large areas of degraded forest are destroyed by fire each year.[21]
Most areas burned are left in poor condition as evidenced by mostly sparse woody,
often deformed or stunted growth and many bare areas where nothing grows and
severe erosion has occurred. Fire not only destroys forest biodiversity and
vegetation and retards forest growth, but also results in erosion, air pollution and
flash-flooding. Proper replanting of severely degraded places is often the only
remedial action available as natural regeneration has stopped in many places.
Overfishing
In 1950, the newly constituted Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the
United Nations estimated that, globally, we were catching about 20 million metric
tons of fish (cod, mackerel, tuna, etc.) and invertebrates (lobster, squid, clams,
etc.). That catch peaked at 90 million tons per year in the late 1980s, and it has
been declining ever since.[22]Thailand is no exception to this decline.
Thailand is a peninsular country of 514,000 km2 blessed with over 3,565 km of
coastline, 2,700 km on the Gulf of Thailand and 865 km on the Andaman Sea. It's
exclusive economic zone extends over 306,000 km2.[23] Historically, fish from
Thailand's off-shore waters have been a significant provider of protein to the
population. In 2001, the average yearly fish consumption was 32.4 kg per capita
and provided on average 10-14 grams of protein per capita per day. It provides
40.5% of animal protein sources and 17.6% of total protein. Consumption of fish is
almost certainly higher than reported as many fish are caught by smallholders and
consumed without passing through the marketplace.[24]
Thailand's marine fish resources are over exploited, and while the catch has
increased, the catch per unit of effort (CPUE) has decreased markedly.[24]:p.1 Put
another way, average catches in Thai waters have fallen by 86% since the
industrys large expansion in the 1960s.[25]
The over-exploitation of fish stocks in Thailand has led to the creation of a huge
aquaculture industry, human trafficking to man fishing vessels voyaging ever
further out to sea, and the depletion of "trash fish" as well as marketable juvenile
fish to feed the increasing demand for fish meal for farmed shrimp.[26]
normal standards, and high concentrations of heavy metals on the river bed poses a
serious threat to ecosystems.[1]
Health effects[edit]
Water pollution results in typhoid, dysentery, hepatitis, trachoma, hookworm, and
diarrhea. In 1999, hospitalization rates were:
Typhoid: 4,000 hospitalizations
Dysentery: 7,000 hospitalizations
Diarrhea: 95,000 hospitalizations
Exposure to toxins and heavy metals in water causes skin disease, liver cancer, and
birth defects. Klity Creek in Kanchanaburi Province was found to carry dangerous
levels of lead from a lead separation plant upstream. Lead levels are apparently the
cause of many cases of Down syndrome in village children, unidentified illnesses in
adults, and many cattle deaths. In 1998, the plant was closed and the creek
dredged, although by 2000 lead levels were still considered unsafe.[citation needed]
Improvement efforts[edit]
In 1992, the government passed several pieces of legislation to prevent water
pollution. The laws primarily limit industrial water contamination:
Enhancement and Conservation of National Environment Quality Act (NEQA) of 1992
Factories Act of 1992
Navigation in Thai Waterways Act (Volume 14 ) as amended in 1992
Public Health Act of 1992
Cleanliness and Tidiness of the Country Act of 1992
The government continues to invest in wastewater treatment plants. In 2000,
enough treated water was available to support 29% of the population, with more
treatment plants under construction. Upon completion, treated water will support
65% of the population. The most common water treatments are inexpensive to build
and maintain. They include oxidation ditches, aerated lagoons, and stabilization
ponds. The government is also investigating more effective and modern techniques
such as constructed wetlands.
Wildlife
Thailand's wildlife is threatened by poaching, habitat loss, and an industry that sells
wild animals as pets.[33]
The elephant is Thailand's national symbol. Although there were 100,000 elephants
in Thailand a century ago, the population of elephants in the wild has dropped to an
estimated 2,000.[34] Poachers have long hunted elephants for ivory, meat, and
hides. Young elephants are often captured for use in tourist attractions or as work
animals, although their use has declined since the government banned logging in
1989. There are now more elephants in captivity than in the wild, and
environmental activists claim that elephants in captivity are often mistreated.[35]
Poaching of protected species remains a major problem. Hunters have decimated
the populations of tigers, leopards, and other large cats for their valuable pelts.
Many animals (including tigers, bears, crocodiles, and king cobras) are farmed or
hunted for their meat, which is considered a delicacy, and for their supposed
medicinal properties. Although such trade is illegal, the famous Bangkok market
Chatuchak is still known for the sale of endangered species.[36][unreliable source?]
The practice of keeping wild animals as pets threatens several species. Baby
animals are typically captured and sold, which often requires killing the mother.
Once in captivity and out of their natural habitat, many pets die or fail to reproduce.
Affected populations include the Asiatic black bear, Malayan sun bear, white-handed
lar, pileated gibbon and binturong.[33]
Large-scale deforestation and development have encroached on many former
wildlife habitats, and pesticides in their food supply has reduced bird populations.
Several species of sawfish are listed as critically endangered because of habitat loss
and overfishing.[37]
Despite Buddhism's professed reverence for life, even Thai clergy have been guilty
of overt animal abuse. One such case, that of Kwan, a Malayan sun bear,
egregiously mistreated at Wat Aungsuwan (aka Wat Nong Hoy) in Prachuap Khiri
Khan Province has been thoroughly documented by the Wildlife Friends Foundation
Thailand (WFFT).[38] First alerted to abuse at the temple in January 2012, it was not
until three years later that Thai wildlife officials acted on behalf of the mistreated
animals.[38]
Conservation in theory[edit]
Conservation bills passed by the government include:[39]
1960 Wild Animal Reservation and Protection Act
1961 National Park Act
1964 National Forest Reserve Act
The government now requires that at least 15% of its land area be protected as
forest, and 22% is currently protected as wildlife sanctuaries or national parks. To
enforce CITES, the government also maintains border checkpoints to prevent animal
smuggling, and works to educate the public about wildlife preservation. Thailand's
Buddhist culture, with its emphasis on respect for all life, has become a key
component of the country's conservation efforts.[33]
Conservation in practice[edit]
Current (2015) national law allows for ivory from domesticated Thai elephants to be
sold legally. As an unintended consequence, large quantities of African ivory can be
laundered through Thai shops. Only by closing the domestic trade in ivory can
Thailand help eliminate the threat to African elephants. Thailand's ivory market is
the largest in the world and trade is largely fuelled by ivory from poached African
elephant's tusks that are smuggled into the country.[41]
In July 2014, at a CITES intercessional meeting, Thailand agreed to a strict timetable
to address the illegal ivory trade or face the threat of trade sanctions. One week
before the meeting, the TRAFFIC had released a survey of Bangkok that found
significantly more retail shops and three times as much ivory on sale as in 2013.
Thailand was given until 30 September 2014 to submit a revised national ivory
action plan, to include a number of CITES specified measures. Thailand was to be
next assessed by CITES on 31 March 2015. If found lacking, CITES will vote vote on
whether trade sanctions should be imposed against the country. The impact of
punitive sanctions on the national economy would be significant: all trade in CITESlisted species would be prohibited. The export of orchids by the country's
horticultural sector, for example, would be stopped, resulting in a loss of more than
US$80 million in annual sales based on the 2013 value of this trade.[42]