Académique Documents
Professionnel Documents
Culture Documents
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 1 of 437
14-5327
United States Court of Appeals
For The Washington District Of Columbia Circuit
Orders ofHon. Richard J, Leon USDJ No. 14-cv-995 on Appeal from the
United States District Court for Washington District of Columbia
APPELLANTS' APPENDIX
Harold William Van Allen
in esse surety for
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 2 of 437
APPELLANTS'APPENDIXINDEX
APX
Circuit order for submission ................................................ 001
Appellants' Notice of Appeal. ............................................... 003
District Minute Order ......................................................... 005
District Memorandum Order ............................................... 006
Notice of Motion to Reargue and Supplement the Complaint ..... 015
Complaint ......................................................................... 100
Notice of Motion To Seal and Protect Material Witnesses ........ 238
Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction.......................... 420
District Court Docket as of 4 March 2015 ............................... 431
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 3 of 437
DocumentAPXOOI
#1550250
~nit.eo ~tat.es
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 4 of 437
C!Iourt of J\pp.eals
No. 14-5327
v.
United States Department of State, et al.,
Appellees
ORDER
It appearing that this case might be suitable for disposition without oral
argument, see Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2) and D.C. Cir. Rule 34U), it is
ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the following briefing schedule will
apply in this case:
Appellants' Brief
Appendix
This order does not preclude the court, after examining the briefs, from setting
this case for oral argument. If the court resolves to decide the case without oral
argument, an order will be issued disclosing the panel prior to issuance of a decision on
the merits. All parties should include the following phrase on any subsequent pleading
or brief filed in this case: "CASE BEING CONSIDERED FOR TREATMENT
PURSUANT TO RULE 34U) OF THE COURT'S RULES."
All issues and arguments must be raised by appellants in the opening brief. The
court ordinarily will not consider issues and arguments raised for the first time in the
reply brief. To enhance the clarity of their briefs, the parties are cautioned to limit the
use of abbreviations, including acronyms. While acronyms may be used for entities and
statutes with widely recognized initials, briefs should not contain acronyms that are not
widely known. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Procedures 41 (2013); Notice
Regarding Use of Acronyms (D.C. Cir. Jan. 26, 201 0).
A request for appointment of counsel does not relieve appellants of the
obligation to file responses to any motion filed by appellees or to comply with any order
APXOOI
DocumentAPX002
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 5 of 437
No. 14-5327
APX002
Page 2
/s/
Jennifer M. Clark
Deputy Clerk
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 6 of 437
APX003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COL~RT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBI.~
------------------------------------------------------------ ----'\
Cas~ ~o.:
14-c\-00995 (RJL)
NOTIC.E OF APPEAL
\.
(1>0~) l-1~
JOH~
----------------------------------------------------------------X
Please take notice that Christopher Earl Strunk and H. William Van AIJen. Plamtitl") pro~~. her~b~
appeal fr(lffi each and e\ef) ran ta~en from rhc Minute Order entered ~m.ember J0 . .:!0 1-l denying the
motion w reargue and supplement the complaint di~misse ~ua sponte with tht" Order nf June ltl. 201-J
;J :~014
Brookl~n~h'tork
jZJ
a--.
1
f.c~L. _. ~ .
_s:::: .
----- .. -----S::~
Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse
59.1 Vundcrhilt t\vt.>nw:. ;r2X I
Bronld~n.
Dated:
Dcccmb~r __ ~ 2014
Hurley Nc\\ ~~~k
APX003
h~
~,('.ct-_.~1
APX004
Hurley, New York 12443
See the following service list:
Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General
The US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20530
US Attorney for
Washington District of Colwnbia
Judiciary Center Building
555 Fourth Street NW
Washington DC 20530
Eric Schneiderman, Attorney General for
----------------~e~neem~~Vrn~---------------------------------------------------------------
~ew
With attachments:
Sua Sponte Order to dismiss the Complaint field June 10, 20 J 4
November 10, 20 14 Minute Order denying the motion to reargue and Supplement the
Complaint.
APX004
Case#14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
9 Filed 12/10/14
Page 3 Q.f J-4,Page
..
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
8 of 437
APX005
Activity in Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL STRUNK et al v. UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
DCD_ECFNotice
to: DCD_ECFNotice
11/10/2014 09:50AM
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CMIECF system. Please DO NOT
RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended.
***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference ofthe United States policy
permits attorneys of record and parties in a case (including prose litigants) to receive one free
electronic copy of all documents filed electronically. if receipt is required by law or directed~
~he filer. PACER access fees appiy ro ail Olber users. Toa,.oid lalerchatgrs.do
'.:"'!!,~~af
=~..:~. ~:...:~~~-!-~~'.hi~~\-~~ ~if- '
. . ... ,11iltl..li{\J --~!J.'t:
::-~t
.. .~ ~ :
.!- - .:
_ .
~ -:: ..
District of Columbia
The follO\\ing transaction was entered on 11 '10,201-+ at 9:-+9 A:v1 EDT and filed on 11/10/~01-t
Case Name:
Case Number:
1 :14--cv-00995-RJL
Filer:
WARNING CASE CLOSED ~r 05 -:6 2C<.!.
: j:t\C"! -
=~~:
. == .:=:-===:
=:
:-..e
:~.:~ ~
:,..:S-.:...,...--:s
Brooklyr. 1\ Y ~ i 233
APX005
-----------------------------------------------
a:~ S.-~~~~ ~ .. ~
-~ ':.r .. - :-~~- ,..;::!:.
; .. -:-: :. __.::.,;~~:--a':.
. :.-;. '::
APX006
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
v.
)
)
)
)
Defendants.
MEMORAND~R
FILED
JUN 1 6 201~
CliO. U.S. Olsbict &Bankruptcy
Prose plaintiffs Christopher Earl Strunk and H. William Van Allen (together
~plaintiffs")
filed the instant action on June I0, 2014. See Complaint with Petition for
Writ of Mandamus and Preliminary Injunction Hearing [Dkt. #1]. Upon consideration of
the facts alleged in the plaintiffs' papers and the relevant law, the Court DENIES
plaintiffs' Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Preliminary Injunction Hearing and
DISMISSES plaintiffs' Complaint.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are clear that although "[njo technical fonn
is required,"' pleadings must be ~~simple, concise, and direct., Fed. R. Civ. P. 8( d)( I).
The Court is mindful, of course, that complaints filed by prose litigants are held to less
stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines
v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Despite this less stringent standard, however, I am
unable to glean from the plaintiffs' papers any legitimate grounds for granting the relief
APX
.6
Case
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
9 Filed 12/10/14
Page 5 of 12Page 10 of 437
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 4 Filed 06/16/14 Page 2 of 2
APX007
they are seeking. Furthennore, the statements contained in the plaintiffs' pleadings fall
well short of the "simple, concise, and direct" requirements of Rule 8(d)( 1).
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Preliminary
APX007
Document #1525269
~nite.b ~tates
Filed : 12/03/2014
Page 1 of 1
OI.ourt of J\ppeals
No. 14-5191
1 :14-cv-0995-RJL
Filed On: December 3, 2014
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition for a writ of mandamus; the motion for leave to
Per Curiam
APX008
Case
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
9 Filed 12/10/14
Page 7 of 12Page 12 of 437
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
No. 13-5160
1 :12-cv-01538-ESH
- ' r ~ . ::r.
v.
..-...
.;
.
~.
~ ~~; ;
.,
- ~-
BEFORE:
' , ..,
~ :
Upon consideration of the court's order, filed October 24, 2013, to show cause
why the district court's dismissal and reconsideration orders, Van Allen v. U.S. Dep't of
Veterans Affairs, 925 F. Supp. 2d 119 (D.D.C. 2013), recons. denied, 2013 WL
1335742 (D.D.C. Apr. 3, 2013), should not be summarily affirmed, and the response
thereto. it is
ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is
FURTHER ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the district court's abovereferenced orders be summarily affirmed. Because the appropriate disposition is so
clear, summary action is warranted. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819
F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987} (per curiam). Although appellant's November 25, 2013
pleading does not address specifically why the district court's dismissal on the grounds
of res judicata/collateral estoppel or the alternative grounds based on the Tucker Act, or
the denial of reconsideration, should not be summarily affirmed, he seems to challenge
the district court's order, filed February 5, 2013, denying his January 24'h "cross
motion," which sought. among other things, a three-judge district court.
APX009
~r--------------------------------------------------------------------
----- ---
~nitea
No. 13-5160
Per Curiam
APXOIO
Case
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
9 Filed 12/10/14
Page 9 of 12Page 14 of 437
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
J\ppeals
No. 13-5160
1 :12-cv-01538-ESH
Filed On: November 3, 2014
v.
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
and United States Department of the Navy,
Board for Correction of Naval Records
{BCNR),
Appellees
BEFORE:
Upon consideration of the "consolidated motion for judicial notice of a motion for
summary judgment in other court 'Veterans Court' USCAVA 13-2235"; and the petition
for rehearing en bane and motion to consolidate. styled as a "Motion to stay or
consolidate with USCA-DCC 14-5191-0P {In re: Harold Van Allen) this motion for en
bane reconsideration of denied appeal of USCA-DCD 1 :12-cv-01538-ESH with pending
SCOTUS petition for certiorari No. 14-6087 and related as yet un-docketed SCOTUS
special writs (original proceedings), n it is
ORDERED that the motion for judicial notice. to the extent it seeks relief from
this court regarding his case in the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, be
denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en bane and motion to
consolidate be denied.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT:
Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY:
APXOll
/s/
Jennifer M. Clark
Deputy Clerk/LD
NOTICE OF MOTION
v.
TO SEAL AND
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 ITY:l-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
------------
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed affidavit of Christopher-Earl: Strunk
affirmed November 8. 2014 with exhibits will move with Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and
Local Rules to Seal the Case and
until further notice as supplement to the Motion Reargue the Order to Dismiss entered June 16,
2014 in order to Supplement the Complaint filed 10 June 2014 with Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule
15(a)(l )(A). and Rule 19(a)(l )(A)(B), heard before the Honorable Richard J. Leon USDJ at the
APX012
Case#14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
9 Filed 12/10/14
Page 11 of 12Page 16 of 437
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
/a/
PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL FOR RECIPIENT EYES ONLY with COURTESY COPY
REDACTED MOTION WITHOUT EXHIBITS TO RECIPIENT:
US Attorney for
35 I North Road
Hurley, New York 12443
MICHAEL SBRIMPTON
8 Jusons Glebe,
APX013
TITLE:
COURT:
DATED:
Strunk v Paterson
COUNTY:
KJ.ngs
Supreme
INDEX NO.: 29642/08
06/27/2014
PAPER:
Order
This case has been assigned the following number on the docket
of this court:
2014-10459
Apr~lanne
Agostino
APX014
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 18 of 437
NOTICE OF MOTION
v.
TO REARGUE THE
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
10 1 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
ORDER TO DISMISS
AND SUPPLEMENT THE
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed affidavit of Christopher-Earl: Strunk affirmed
June 25. 2014 with exhibits and proposed First Supplement to the Complaint annexed, will move
as of right in compliance with Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules to Reargue the
Order to Dismiss entered June 16, 2014 in order to Supplement the Complaint filed 10 June 2014
with Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(1)(A), and Rule 19(a)(l)(A)(B), heard before the Honorable
Richard J. Leon USDJ at the designated Courtroom in the Courthouse at 333 Constitution
APX015
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 19 of 437
Avenue NW Washington DC 20001, on a day of June 2014, at a time designated by the Court or
as soon thereafter as counsel can be heard.
/s/ agent
Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris
secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust
transmitting utility TMCHRISTOPHER EARL
STRUNK Plaintiff, the Executor and Settlor
for the Exeress Deed In Trust To The United
States OfAmerica, located at
593 Vanderbilt Avenue- PMB 281
Brooklyn, New York Zipcode excepted 11238
Cell: 845-901-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws
SERVICE LIST:
8 Jusons Glebe,
Wendover, United Kingdom HP22 6PF
APX016
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 20 of 437
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 220I C StreetNW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:I-800-877-8339
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION TO
REARGUE THE ORDER TO DISMISS AND TO SUPPLEMENT THE COMPLAINT
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
)
) ss.
)
Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
APX017
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 21 of 437
1. Movant is Plaintiff, CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, public officer Executor for the
Express Deed in Trust to the United States ofAmerica under 12 USC 95 with 50 USC App.
5(b) and related Law explained in Complaint Exhibit 13, affirms this affidavit in support if
his Notice of Motion in compliance with Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rules to
Reargue the Order to Dismiss by the Honorable Richard J. Leon USDJ and entered June 16,
2014 (see Exhibit A), and as of right to Supplement the Complaint filed 10 June 2014 with
Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(l)(A), and Rule 19(a)(l)(A)(B) (see the proposed First
Supplement with Exhibit 14 thru 20 to the Complaint with Exhibits 1 thru 13 filed on June
10, 2014.
2. That Affirmant wishes to comply with the Order to Dismiss entered on June 16, 2014 with
the demand that the Complaint having been filed requires a more "simple, concise, and
direct" definite statement in keeping with Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 8(d)(l) and to include all
essential parties-in-interest with Supplemental Plaintiff MICHAEL SHRIMPTON with
Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris secured beneficiary agent for debtor trust
transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK Plaintiff (STRUNK), and Harold
William Van Allen in esse surety-indenture for debtor trust H. WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
Plaintiff (VAN ALLEN), hereinafter known as the Petitioners, that bring this Complaint with
Petition for a writ of mandamus and preliminary injunction for hearing the facts of the
complaint for equity relief under 28 USC 2201 and 2202, and it being alleged that there is a
matter of malicious infringement of fundamental rights of the posterity of private citizens of
the United States that inter alia under color of law is a matter of diversity by interference
with a contract and judicial process that with such wrongful acts of perjury, spoliation,
concealment, intimidation, forgery, use of false instruments, aiding and abetting the enemy
APX018
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 22 of 437
APX019
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 23 of 437
5. There is a requirement under the Rules that all essential parties be joined by Court
Order with FDCvP Rule 19(a)(2) and applies to Mr. SHRIMPTON under the present
circumstances as follows:
(2) Joinder by Court Order. If a person has not been joined as required, the court
must order that the person be made a party. A person who refuses to join as a
plaintiff may be made either a defendant or, in a proper case, an involuntary
plaintiff.
6. There is a requirement under the Rules that the Court determine whether or not all
essential parties be joined by necessity and therefore A:ffirmant complies with FDCvP
Rule 19(b) and applies as follows:
(b) WHEN JOINDER IS NOT FEASIBLE. If a person who is required to be
joined if feasible cannot be joined, the court must determine whether, in equity
and good conscience, the action should proceed among the existing parties or
APX020
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 24 of 437
11. That Defendants RANDOM HOUSE, LLC., and PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE
FOUNDATION, INC are liable entities for the merger with RANDOM HOUSE INC.
12. That RANDOM HOUSE, INC. published the Book "Dreams From My Father" in 1995.
13. That THE NEW YORK TIMES BOOK CO., INC. (aka "TIMES BOOKS INC.") had a role
in the publishing of the Book "Dreams From My Father" in 1995;
14. That Defendant MICHAEL GREAVES was the agent for RANDOM HOUSE INC. and
TIMES BOOKS INC. that on October 30, 1995 filed the copyright application with the US
Copyright Office for "Dreams From My Father" in conjunction with JANE D. DYSTEL.
15. That Defendant JANE D. DYSTEL is the literary agent for the Book "Dreams From My
APX 021
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 25 of 437
Father" published in 1995 for the author Barack Hussein Obama II, and done while
incorporated with ACTON, DYSTEL, LEONE & JAFFE, INC. of 79 Fifth Avenue New
York, NY 10003; and that now is the entity Defendant JANE DYSTEL LITERARY
MANAGEMENT INC. located at Union Square West #904 New York, New York, 10003
16. That in 1995 in conjunction with the publishing of the Book "Dreams From My Father"
Defendants DYSTEL and GREAVES used the biography given by the author BARACK
HUSSEIN OBAMA II, in the publication, copyright and sales of the Book for 17 years,
and therein stated that the author Barack Obama was Born in Kenya shown as the
Supplement Exhibit 14.
17. That starting in December 2013, STRUNK attempted to obtain a copy of the Copyright
filed with the US Copyright Office on October 30, 1995 to no avail has been withheld.
18. That in January 2014 STRUNK received a PDF by email purported to be the copy of the
actual copyright for "Dream From My Father,, of 1995 shown as Supplement Exhibit 15.
19. That during January 2014 Defendant DYSTEL suggested that she falsely manufactured
the biography for the author Barack Hussein Obama II with the allegation that he had
been born in Kenya when in fact DYSTEL was certain he was born in the USA.
20. That the purported replica of the actual copyright for "Dreams From My Father,, shown
as Exhibit 15 is a crude falsified instrument with so many errors and anomalies that
only further heightens the suspicion that BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II was as Mr.
Shrimpton contends by the sworn affidavit shown as Exhibit 4 that in fact Defendant
OBAMA was born in KENYA not the USA.
21. That the above evidence gives credence for further suspicions raised since 2008 that is
alleged as the Complaint Seventh Cause of Action that Defendant OBAMA is not born
in Hawaii as is further supported by the analysis of document expert PAUL EDWARD
APX 022
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 26 of 437
IREY who on December 4, 2012 swore to an affidavit that the purported Certificate of
Live Birth (CoLB) presented by Defendant OBAMA and his agents at a White House
Press Conference on April27, 2011, and is in fact proven to be a crude falsified
instrument that was thereafter used to obtain Ballot access at the 2012 General
Election shown as Supplement Exhibit 16.
22. That since December 4, 2012 Mr. IREY has done further analysis of the false
instrument shown as Exhibit 16, and is further proof of a crime involves the purported
CoLB by the false instrument of JOHANNA SOLANGE SIERRA OK-HEE AN'NEE.
23. That on June 23, 2014 Mr. IREY forwarded to me his expert analysis of the further
proof that the same forger did both false instruments of JOHANNA SOLANGE
SIERRA OK-HEE AN'NEE and those used by Defendant OBAMA shown as Supplement
Exhibit 17.
24. That STRUNK alleges as to the Seventh Cause of Action that a false instrument
purported to be the copyright of 1995 shown as Exhibit 15 had first been faxed to
whomever forged or tendered the instrument and that based upon the anomaly left by
the faxed roll paper "low" stripe on the left side of both pages that it had been there
before the forger added photoshoped appliques that is proven by the stark difference in
the before and after letter I line degradation, alleges Mr. OBAMA was born in the USA
rather than Kenya.
25. That in addition to the proof of the false instrument shown as Exhibit 15 being faxed
and leaving a signature ofthat mechanical operation, Mr. IREYperformed an analysis
shown as Supplement Exhibit 18 with the same methods used as shown with Exhibit 16
and Exhibit 17.
26. That STRUNK as the public officer Executor for the Express Deed in Trust to the United
APX 023
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 27 of 437
States ofAmerica, as explained in Exhibit 13 has standing to challenge any incumbent and or
candidate who by preponderance of evidence is not eligible under the Constitution for the
United States Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 for office of POTUS, has an obligation to the
beneficiaries of the Deed in Trust to seek and obtain equity relief by this Court based upon
the evidence that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is not eligible to be POTUS.
27. That STRUNK, unlike Mr. VAN ALLEN, is a private citizen of the United States entitled to
the full and complete protection of the Constitution for the United States of Atnerica and its
associated amendments unlike those who remain the surety-indenture to the U.S. Public
Citizen debtor entities by operation of 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) with related law by
the Usurper's annual renewed national emergency or state of war Orders are void ab initio.
28. That STRUNK has been outra eously harmed by the sanction in the total amount of more
than $177,000 by Order of Judge Arthur M. Schack Justice of the New York Supreme Court
in the County of Kings in case Strunk v NYS Board of Elections et al. Index No. 6500-2011
for having alleged that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is ineligible to occupy
the Office of President of the United States Executive and Commander-in-chief would be
exonerated of such sanction were Supplemental Plaintiff's expert testimony, cross
examination and further discovery as to the truth of his allegations were presented at trial.
29. That STRUNK alleges and has proven the ineligibility ofBARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II,
is not born on soil of even of one US Citizen parent much less two (as defined in Exhibit 13)
and Mr. OBAMA is willfully culpable with those Defendants and agents who promoted
the 2008 I 2012 usurpation of POTUS commander-in-chief office in charge of the de facto
Federal and State's Court system by operation of law by void ab initio Executive Orders.
30. That for STRUNK to exonerate himself requires a trial by JURY, in light of the Court's
reluctance to honor STRUNK's public duty to the posterity of the Deed in Trust.
APX 024
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 28 of 437
31. That the records and index of Mr. OBAMA's foreign student funding while attending
Columbia University in New York is recorded at the NYS Higher Education Services
Corporation associated with Federal funds, have been withheld shown as Supplement
Exhibit 19, and is the subject of the request for subpoenas now before the Honorable
David I. Schmidt in Strunk v. Paterson et al. NYS SC Kings County Index No 296422008, shown as Supplement Exhibit 20.
32. That STRUNK at trial requires the testimony of Mr. SHRIMPTON, Mr. IREY, and by
the Defendants as to facts and documents requested by subpoena issued by this Court.
33. Plaintiff STRUNK wishes by the above aforementioned supplemental reasons and
those of the Complaint, that this Court Mandate and Order the U.S. Department of
State to provide a non-immigrant visa to Mr. SHRIMPTON, that the US Copyright
Office release the actual certified copy of the 1995 copyright of"Dreams From My
Father", and or Defendants' agencies under their control release documents proving
ultra vires acts of Defendants and or their agents to spoliate conceal and destroy records
and interfere with the conduct of judicial proceedings and provision of justice; and that
this court take supplemental jurisdiction over the NYS BOE to immediately order the
turn-over of the documents referred to above regarding the outrageous use of the "born
a citizen" term rather than the Constitutionally mandated use of the "natural-born
Citizen" term of art to be used exclusively as to the eligibility of a "natural-born Citizen"
private citizen of the United States for POTUS and who is no longer surety-indenture of
the debtor owned by the United States in service of the creditors to the United States'
debt under the provision of martial process with 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) and
related law, and that the expert testimony by MICHAEL SHRIMPTON and PAUL
EDWARD IREY be scheduled for hearing in regards to a preliminary injunction for a
APX 025
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 29 of 437
declaratory judgment stating simply "that BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is not eligible
for the Office of POTUS according to the Constitution for the United States Article 2
Section 1 Clause 5'', and letting the chips fall where they may fall as matter of grave
national security for Congress to remedy exclusively, and that the Court for the other
causes of action provide for further and different relief including a jury trial.
" WHEREFORE, Plaintiff STRUNK wishes the Court to grant this motion to reargue the
Order to dismiss and that essential parties to this instant action be added, along with the
additional transactions being germane herein for justice to be done, and that the changes to
the caption of the Supplement as to existing defendants be incorporated into the court
record for the issuance of additional summons to each defendants and for a preliminary
hearing be scheduled by the court along with subpoenas with further and different relief as
the court deems necessary.
I have read the foregoing along with the annexed First Supplement to the Complaint with
Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and I know its contents;
the facts stated in the Petition are true to my own personal knowledge, except as to the matters
therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be
true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as
follows:
3rd
parties, books and records, and personal knowledge. except as to those stated upon
Is/ agent
Christopher Earl Strunk
Sworn to before me
This 25th day of June 2014
Is/
Notary Public
Affidavit in support of Motion to Reargue Page 10 of 10
APX 026
Case
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Page 1 of 2Page 30 of 437
USCA Case
#14-5327
DocumentDocument
#15502504 Filed 06/16/14
Filed: 04/30/2015
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF STATE, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMO
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
RAND~
FILED
JUN 1 6 2014
Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy
Courts for the District of Cclumbic
"plaintiffs") filed the instant action on June 10, 2014. See Complaint with Petition for
Writ ofMandamus and Preliminary Injunction Hearing [Dkt. #1]. Upon consideration of
the facts alleged in the plaintiffs' papers and the relevant law, the Court DENIES
plaintiffs' Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Preliminary Injunction Hearing and
DISMISSES plaintiffs' Complaint.
The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are clear that although "[n]o technical form
is required," pleadings must be "simple, concise, and direct." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(d)(l).
The Court is mindful, of course, that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less
stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines
v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Despite this less stringent standard, however, I am
unable to glean from the plaintiffs' papers any legitimate grounds for granting the relief
APX 027
they are seeking. Furthermore, the statements contained in the plaintiffs' pleadings fall
well short of the "simple, concise, and direct" requirements of Rule 8( d)( 1).
Accordingly, it is hereby
SO ORDERED.
APX 028
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 32 of 437
Plaintiffs,
v.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
NOW COMES CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, public officer Executor for the
Express Deed in Trust to the United States ofAmerica under Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 15(a)(1)(A),
APX 029
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 33 of 437
and Rule 19(a)(l)(A)(B), with this First Supplement to the Complaint filed on June 10, 2014 (see
annexed with Exhibits 1 thru 13), wishing to comply with the Order to Dismiss signed June 13,
2014 by the Honorable Richard J. Leon entered on June 16, 2014 with the demand that the
Complaint having been filed requires a more "simple, concise, and direct" definite statement in
keeping with Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 8(d)(l) include all essential parties-in-interest with
Supplemental Plaintiff MICHAEL SHRIMPTON with Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris
secured beneficiary agent for debtor trust transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL
STRUNK Plaintiff(STRUNK), and Harold William Van Allen in esse surety-indenture for
debtor trust H. WILLIAM VAN ALLEN Plaintiff (VAN ALLEN), hereinafter known as the
Petitioners, that bring this Complaint with Petition for a writ of mandamus and preliminary
in"unction for hearin the facts of the com laint for equity relief under 28 USC 2201 and 2202,
and it being alleged that there is a matter of malicious infringement of fundamental rights of the
posterity of private citizens of the United States that inter alia under color of law is a matter of
diversity by interference with a contract and judicial process that with such wrongful acts of
perjury, spoliation, concealment, intimidation, forgery, use of false instruments, aiding and
abetting the enemy while under a state of war or national emergency, is misprision of felony,
misprision of treason and treason per se done individually and or jointly by the captioned
Defendants; and hereinafter upon information, belief and or with direct knowledge Petitioners
allege of Defendants and Supplemental Defendants with five (5) Exhibits 14 thru 18 as to:
RANDOM HOUSE, LLC., PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE FOUNDATION, INC. and
MICHAEL GREAVES as to entities RANDOM HOUSE, INC. and THE NEW YORK TIMES
BOOK CO., INC. (aka TIMES BOOKS INC"); ACTON, DYSTEL, LEONE & JAFFE, INC.;
and JANE D. DYSTEL, individually and severally that:
APX 030
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 34 of 437
a British Citizen, born on the 9th day of March 1957, with my place of business located
at 8 Jusons Glebe, Wendover, ofBuckinghamshire, United Kingdom HP22 6PF.
2. That Mr. SHRIMPTON is a barrister in independent practice, called to the Bar by
Gray's Inn at Michaelmas 1983. I am also an independent intelligence consultant and
author, formerly a member of the Adjunct Faculty of the American Military University
(AMU), which is accredited to the Department of Defense. I taught at AMU on the
Masters in Strategic Intelligence program (since this affidavit is being used in an
American court, as a courtesy, I am using American English, or what I fondly imagine
to be American usage). My book Spy hunter: A Secret History of German Intelligence was
published in England by June Press (Totnes, in the County of Devonshire) on April 15th
2014. Spyhunter is a 711 page intelligence text (see the annexed blurb). I also write a
weekly intelligence column for www.VeteransToday.com and have had a peer-reviewed
article published in the Journal of International Security Affairs, published by the
reputable Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA). I have participated in
JINSA expert panels on counterterrorism in Washington and at the Simon Wiesenthal
Center in Los Angeles. I was a speaker at both the Intelligence Conference at Crystal
City, VA in 2005 and the Intelligence Summit, at the same venue, the following year.
Shortly after the Summit concluded the United States Navy were gracious enough to fly
me out to the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (CVN-65) at sea, in a
Northrop Grumman C-2A Greyhound, as part of their Distinguished Visitor Program. I
am a member in good standing of the Royal United Services Institute and the United
States Naval Institute. I was invited to join British Mensa in 2012 and am SIGSec of
their Intelligence and National Security Special Interest Group. I attended the launch
APX 031
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 35 of 437
of the United Kingdom National Defence Association in 2007, am a founder member and
a member of their advisory council, which has gone through various guises since being
set up (it is a largely honorific post and the council does not meet as a body). A number
of former Chiefs of the UK Defence Staff are Patrons of UKNDA, whose main aim is to
encourage support for our fighting services and press for an increase in their lamentably
low budget, even lower than the Pentagon's, I am sorry to say.
3. That in 1992 Mr. SHRIMPTON was appointed a part-time Chairman of the
Immigration Appeal Tribunal (IAT) by the then Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain,
Lord Mackay of Clashfern. The IAT heard immigration appeals from all over the
United Kingdom, including Scotland, and the Islands. It was both an appellate and first
instance tribunal, with legally qualified chairmen sitting with lay members, usually
two. The lay members tended to have military, intelligence or colonial experience, but
they came from all walks of life and had varied backgrounds. First instance cases were
heard under s.3(5)(b) of the Immigration Act 1971 (Imp.) and consisted of appeals
against decisions to deport on the ground that it was conducive to the public good,
usually following a sentence of imprisonment for a serious crime, such as narcotics
trafficking.
4. That in 1995, Mr. SHRIMPTON was appointed additionally to serve as an Immigration
Adjudicator and Special Adjudicator. Special Adjudicators, now known as Immigration
Judges, heard appeals against refusal of political asylum in the United Kingdom. The
IAT was abolished not long after I retired from it in 2005. It is right to say that I was
prevented from sitting after November 2003 and that when I resigned I was in dispute
with the Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain and Secretary of State for
Constitutional Affairs, Lord Falconer ofThoroton QC. This is not the place to go into
the rights and wrongs of that dispute, but it flowed from my intelligence work and
APX 032
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 36 of 437
followed a bad faith complaint in June 2002 to my professional body, the Bar Council, by
a Citizen ofthe Islamic Republic of Iran, whom I was advised was connected to their
intelligence service, VEVAK. That complaint in turn followed my successful
representation of an officer of the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) who had been
instrumental in expanding the CIA's network inside Iran after the 1979 Iranian
Revolution. VEVAK, working with the Iraqi Mukhabarat, were involved in the
prosecution of this officer, indeed it transpired that VEVAK had an asset inside the
Crown Prosecution Service, E. I was partially responsible for the exposure ofE, who
was thought to have an Iraqi background but whose family in fact came from Iran. My
former client had a distinguished CIA career and was formerly a Lockheed U-2 pilot,
indeed he was on the U-2 shakedown program.
5. That Mr. SHRIMPTON intends to testify as an expert witness as to facts and direct
experience related to the ineligibility of Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II to
the Office of President of the United States (POTUS), and as sworn to May 1, 2014 by
the Affidavit shown in the Complaint as Exhibit 4, and as to transactions of this case.
6. That according to 28 U.S. Code 1332- Mr. SHRIMPTON as a nonimmigrant has a
Diversity of citizenship as alleged in the Complaint First through Fifth Cause of Action in
regards to his scheduled expert testimony effecting his publishing costs for "SPYHUNTER:
The Secret History of German Intelligence" in the United States and elsewhere that amount
in a controversy under section (a) "The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all
civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of$75,000, exclusive
of interest and costs, and is between- (2) citizens of a State (New York and Washington
District of Columbia) and citizens or subjects of a foreign state (United Kingdom); and (3)
citizens of different States (New York and Washington District of Columbia) and in which
APX 033
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 37 of 437
APX 034
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 38 of 437
15. That starting in December 2013, STRUNK attempted to obtain a copy of the Copyright
filed with the US Copyright Office on October 30, 1995 to no avail has been withheld.
16. That in January 2014 STRUNK received a PDF by email purported to be the copy of the
actual copyright for "Dream From My Father" of 1995 (see Exhibit 15).
17. That during January 2014 Defendant DYSTEL suggested that she falsely manufactured
the biography for the author Barack Hussein Obama II with the allegation that he had
been born in Kenya when in fact DYSTEL was certain he was born in the USA.
18. That the purported replica of the actual copyright for "Dreams From My Father" shown
as Exhibit 15 is a crude falsified instrument with so many errors and anomalies that
only further heightens the suspicion that BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II was as Mr.
Shrimpton contends by the sworn affidavit shown as Exhibit 4 that in fact Defendant
OBAMA was born in KENYA not the USA.
19. That the above evidence gives credence for further suspicions raised since 2008 that is
alleged as the Complaint Seventh Cause of Action that Defendant OBAMA is not born
in Hawaii as is further supported by the analysis of document expert PAUL EDWARD
IREY who on December 4, 2012 swore to an affidavit that the purported Certificate of
Live Birth (CoLB) presented by Defendant OBAMA and his agents at a White House
Press Conference on April27, 2011, and is in fact proven to be a crude falsified
instrument that was thereafter used to obtain Ballot access at the 2012 General
Election (see Exhibit 16).
20. That since December 4, 2012 Mr. IREY has done further analysis of the false
instrument shown as Exhibit 16, and is further proof of a crime involves the purported
CoLB by the false instrument of JOHANNA SOLANGE SIERRA OK-HEE AN'NEE.
21. That on June 23, 2014 Mr. IREY forwarded to me his expert analysis of the further
proof that the same forger did both false instruments of JOHANNA SOLANGE
APX 035
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 39 of 437
SIERRA OK-HEE AN'NEE and those used by Defendant OBAMA (see Exhibit 17).
22. That STRUNK alleges as to the Sixth Cause of Action that a false instrument purported
to be the copyright of 1995 shown as Exhibit 15 had first been faxed to whomever forged
or tendered the instrument and that based upon the anomaly left by the faxed roll paper
"low" stripe on the left side of both pages that it had been there before the forger added
photoshoped appliques that is proven by the stark difference in the before and after
letter I line degradation, alleges Mr. OBAMA was born in the USA rather than Kenya.
23. That in addition to the proof of the false instrument shown as Exhibit 15 being faxed
and leaving a signature of that mechanical operation, Mr. IREYperformed an analysis
(see Exhibit 18) with the same methods used as shown with Exhibit 16 and Exhibit 17.
24. That STRUNK as the public officer Executor for the Express Deed in Trust to the United
States ofAmerica, as explained in Exhibit 13 has standing to challenge any incumbent and or
candidate who by preponderance of evidence is not eligible under the Constitution for the
United States Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 for office ofPOTUS, has an obligation to the
beneficiaries of the Deed in Trust to seek and obtain equity relief by this Court based upon
the evidence that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is not eligible to be POTUS.
25. That STRUNK, unlike Mr. VAN ALLEN, is a private citizen of the United States entitled to
the full and complete protection of the Constitution for the United States of America and its
associated amendments unlike those who remain the surety-indenture to the U.S. Public
Citizen debtor entities by operation of 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b) with related law by
the Usurper's annual renewed national emergency or state of war Orders are void ab initio.
26. That STRUNK has been outrageously harmed by the sanction in the total amount of more
than $177,000 by Order of Judge Arthur M. Schack Justice ofthe New York Supreme Court
in the County of Kings in case Strunk v NYS Board of Elections et al. Index No. 6500-2011
APX 036
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 40 of 437
for having alleged that Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is ineligible to occupy
the Office of President ofthe United States Executive and Commander-in-chief would be
exonerated of such sanction were Supplemental Plaintiffs expert testimony, cross
examination and further discovery as to the truth of his allegations were presented at trial.
27. That STRUNK alleges and has proven the ineligibility of BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II,
is not born on soil of even of one US Citizen parent much less two (as defined in Exhibit 13)
and Mr. OBAMA is willfully culpable with those Defendants and agents who promoted
the 2008 I 2012 usurpation ofPOTUS commander-in-chief office in charge ofthe defacto
Federal and State's Court system by operation of law by void ab initio Executive Orders.
28. That for STRUNK to exonerate himself requires a trial by JURY, in light of the Court's
reluctance to honor STRID..JK's public duty to the posterity of the Deed in Trust.
29. That the records and index of Mr.
OB~'s
Columbia University in New York is recorded at the NYS Higher Education Services
Corporation associated with Federal funds, have been withheld see Exhibit 19, and is
the subject of the request for subpoenas now before the Honorable David I. Schmidt in
Strunh v. Paterson et al. NYS SC Kings County Index No 29642-2008, see Exhibit 20.
30. That STRUNK at trial requires the testimony of Mr. SHRIMPTON, Mr. IREY, and by
the Defendants as to facts and documents requested by subpoena issued by this Court.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff STRUNK wishes by the above aforementioned supplemental
reasons and those of the Complaint, that this Court Mandate and Order the U.S.
Department of State to provide a non-immigrant visa to Mr. SHRIMPTON, that the US
Copyright Office release the actual certified copy of the 1995 copyright of "Dreams From My
Father', and or Defendants' agencies under their control release documents proving ultra
vires acts of Defendants and or their agents to spoliate conceal and destroy records and
APX 037
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 41 of 437
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 42 of 437
Plaintiffs,
v.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
Exhibit 14
APX 039
Document #1550250
APX 040
...
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 43 of 437
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 44 of 437
Plaintiffs,
v.
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Exhibit 15
APX041
USCA Additional
Case #14-5327
Document
#1550250
Certificate (17 U.S.
C. i06~
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 45 of 437
FORMTX
Certificate of Registration
~nPVI=lt~uT ,....,..~,,...-
EFFEJrlvs::a?re OF REGISTRATIO~
YeM
Uay
~ ivc:
If thi.: work w .1: p u l-h, ho...J .1 ~ .1 .:ontnbuti.on tu.1 f'l'ru >o.l c.l. !:rt.,l. o..r ,.,,n,..:ti ...on . s ivc in fu rm.,ll,,n,,buutthc
Title of Collective Work Y
.1p~arcd
Volume Y
Number'Y
a ----------------------------------------------------------
USA
Barack Obama
wwork
mold~
work a
for hire"?
Yt.'S
Name or Country
nonymous.
OR
r\ATURE OF AUTHORSHIP
On Pages 'Y
Brie n ~ J.:~.cnb.: nature of m.ltLri.11 created by thb aulhl'r m wh1ch copyright is d.l imed .
'Y
DATES
0~
Ycilr Born..,.
W01s thi~ contribution to the! work a
"work m01dc for hin1"?
Y..'S
oR{
ONo
NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP
Name or Counw
Citizen of~-----------
DomtciiL'<I i n ~
~work
Ultu
DYes
tJt - ..
loave thlt
spac:& lor dat il
Name ol Country
OR { Cihzcn of Jll>
Domtetll'd i n~
P~udt'nvmuu!>?
ONo
Anuoymou~?
C Y'--s 0 No
0 Y'-'S 0 No
?~~~~!:C~u:::s
instf\JdlOtls
NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP
ot bulh and
ceatl\ otank
Seeii1SITUC;tiOIIS
bCIIOIO compleltl'g
!hs space
199 5
-
must be given
Vear In 111 cases.
Compietelhlslnlormalion
ONLY II this work
has been published.
USA
__ .
COPYRIGHT CLAIMANT(S) Name .1nd addr~s must btt givt'n t'\'t'n if th~ ciJimant is the s.1ml' 3!'
Barack Obama c/o
79
Sth x~enae
NY NY
_. _ _
~ Nat-otl
APPLICATION RECEIVED
ffi!;
;5
t:w - - - - - -- -
- -- -- - --
--------------------------------~~~moo~~~~~wro
TRANSFER If the cl3im.lnl(, ) namo..-d hero.. '" ~p.1cc J 1s: (.1rcl Jtlll!n.ont fn,m th~ ,luth,,r(sl n.\m~.J in
sp.tCL' 2. giw ,, brit'f J>l.l!t.mt.nt uf huw thl d.tinMniCJ:) obt.1lnl'd ownt.'t'!:hip
I)(
~~ ~9YoiF9d~~J
Q
Complele all apphc:able spaces I numbers 5 1 t) on ll'le reverse side ol lhs page
See delatled lf\Siruc1Jons
APX042
~pages
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 46 of 437
\.'1
FOR
COPYRIGHT
OFFICE
USE
ONLY
CORRESPONDENCE
Yes
'H.,;as~~a:Stwlll'iCOI:'CIOrzN1110...T=WR11111111T E-ABOaVE-TH..;I.;.S.;:La~clN-E._,IFciY~Oi..iUZiiNS.:E;;ED;.;gM~O;.RiliiE.aS~PaAIIICaE~,._u...
sE_.A.S~E-PAaRaAii.T.EI:.CaOuNTt.r.iN.Uii:A.iiTIIiiOE;N::=SHiiiE;iE;:iT::i.;.~:e~~:~...a!ICI:!B:am~~zaa'CIIIlDI:!
PREVIOUS REGJSTRATION lias n');istration forth~ wurk. ur fur .1n cMiit.'f \"\.n:km uf this work. ,tlrL'aJy bt.'l.'tl mad\.' in thL' Cupyri);ht Ofiicc?
0 Y~s !X No If yuur .:105\Wr is "Yl'S; why is anoth\.'r n-gbtrtltitm ~-in,; ~uughl? tCht.'Ck .tppmpri.ltc bo);) 'Y
11.
b. C Thi.o; is Ih.: first applic.tlil\n submitll'\f by thi~ author a!> l'llpyri>;ht daim.mt.
c. 0 Thb i:. .1 chant;t.-.1 , ..... r,.ion "r tlw work . .1:; ~h,>wn hy sp.s~t. 11 l>n I hi..; 'rrlic.Jtiun.
If your .1nswcr is y._-s," ~it....: Previous Registr.ation Number T
Y~.1r of Registration T
DERIVATIVE WORK OR COMPILATION Comph.ott. b<lh !<f-'lC\! t>.:o .:and nh iM ,, dt.'ri\;tti\'C work: cumpll'tt. only 6b for a compil.1tion.
a. Preexis~ng Materi.JI Jd~o'nllf\' .my .,pn-cxistln~ work or work.' th.Jtthi5 wurk 11' b,,,.._'<fon <lr inrorpc.lrJtl'S. 'Y
- -- .
----
--
------
-.
b. Material Added to This Work Give i1 brid, SL'nt:ral statl'm~nt of the m.ucrioal thdt ius bt.-en .lddt.<d to this work .snd in which c11pyriJ;hl is claimt..J. 'Y
-space deletedREPRODUCTION FOR t:SE OF BLIND OR I"HYSICALL Y HANDICAPPED INDIV1DUALS A si~n.1turcan this furm at !:pace 10itnd a check in on"
of the boxes here in space 8 roru.titute5 a no~clust~ grant oi pt.'rmissiun to the Library of Congrt.'SS to r~roduce and distribute solely fM the blind and physically
handicappt-d and undt.r thl.' conditions .1nd limttations prt.':!Gitxd by th~ rl-sul.ltltlll:. ul the Cc>pyngt.t Offic~ (II coptt.'S of tlu: work iJt.ntiii.-d in spa'c 1 of this
applicatiOn in Br.tillc (or simil.u tactile symbols); or (2J phono:'-'CUrds t."mbudying a lia;.ttion o oa reading of th.:at work; or (3) both.
1
b0
Copu~:s Only
c C Phonorecord!> Only
DEPOSIT ACCOUNT If the registration fcc Is to be chars~-d ta a Deposit A(.'(.'Ount established In the Ccprright Office, give name and numb.rr or Account.
Name
Ac(ount Number ..,
59757
------~~~~~~~~~~-------------------------
CORRESPONDENCE Gin nam~ .1nd o~ddress to whtch cont'SponJence about th:s applicabon should~ St.:nt.
91110 yoUT
{0
d.lytime photle
number
....
MAIL
CERTIF-1CATETO
1-Na;n;y-- - -
Certiflcsle
envelope
-- - -
c-==--
10022
10
- - -- -- ---
Numo.uStree1/Apartmwnt Number
will be
mailed In
window
author
Inc.
----- ......
____
----
-----,
,
-------\
----,----------1
YOUMUST:
- -.
MAIL TO;
RegiSter of Copynghls
l.Jbt31Y of Conaress
'17 U.S.C. 506(e): Arty per$0n wno knowingly makes o faJse represen!ooon o1 a matonal ~ in the applicatiOn lor c:opynot\1 reotStratiOtl ptovideO lot by section 409, 01111 arrt wnnen statement hied 10 COlW!CtiOn
wath lhe appbc:atJDn. shall be hned notcr.ore 1han S2.500.
July 1993-400,000
(!) PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
-.uS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: t99334258Z,B0.020
APX043
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 47 of 437
Plaintiffs,
v.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
Exhibit 16
APX044
Document #1550250
AFFIDAVIT
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 48 of 437
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
) ss.
)
I, Paul Edward lrey, being duly sworn, depose and say underpenalty of
perjury:
1. I am over the age of 18 years old, am a resident of Florida located
at Delray Beach and have been previously accepted by the courts as an
expert witness and have testified as such expert to the information
contained in this affidavit is based on my personal knowledge and,
if called as a witness, I could testify completely thereto.
2. I have 57 years experience in graphics. first in serving with the U.S. Air
Force being trained as a clerk typist, two of those years with the
National Security Agency for which I had a Top Secret security
clearance during the years 1957 and 1958.
3. Following that I was employed in Manhattan, New York on the art
staff of the Hearst trade journal American Druggist. I was employed at
various advertising agencies in Manhattan until 1968 when I started
my own business in Ft. Lee, New Jersey named Bergen Graphics.
4. By the mid seventies I employed 60 people as graphic artists, typesetters,
camera and darkroom workers doing pre-press services for major retail
and printing firms in the New York city area such as Montgomery Ward
Catalogs and weekly newspaper ads nationwide, Acme markets
newspaper ads for the entire supermarket chain in the northeast, Hearst
Blue Book Auto Repair manuals, Key Food Stores of New York and Long
Page 1
APX045
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 49 of 437
6. The first Exhibit "A" annexed herewith is a page from a recent issue of
my latest graphic production was published by the the Washington Times
weekly edition that contains much of the evidence that I will explain in this
affidavit.
7. I prepared and wrote this full page shown as Exhibit A rnyself and attest
that the evidence contained therein is accurate and represents ev1 ence o
forgery of what on 27 April at the Press Conference presentation by
White house Consel Bob Bauer, While Press Secretary Jay Carney and
Barack Obama himself allege is Obama's long form birth certificate.
8. The actual document I used for examination of the Obama birth certificate
is described in the following chain of evidence contained in Exhibit "8" ...
page 1 & 2 & 3 anneexed herewith, and
9. That shown as Exhibit "B" page 1 and 2 is the proof of purchase of a 14" x
16" reproduction print from Associated Press through their division called
"Replay Photos" that sells photographic items from their news service and
that shown as Exhibit "B" page 3 is a copy of that page purchased as a
true and accurate copy of what the ASSOCIATED Press acquired from the
White House at the news conference on the morning of 27 April 2011.
Page 2
APX046
Paragraph
USCA10
Case #14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 50 of 437
Shown below is an enlarged section of the Obama long form birth certificate that was released online at
whitehouse.go\ on 27 April 20 LJ. No admission has been made as to '"ho actually scanned and conn~rted this
to an Adobe Acrobat PDF file and posted it on the official \Vhite House website. It is not known if it was
someone at the White House or someone at the Honolulu department of health that had previously provided
two copies of Obama's birth certificate that were hand-carried from Hawaii to the White House.
The important feature to obserYe is that even thing in black is outlined in \vhite. This will be referred to as
"The \t\'hite Halo".
The Honolulu dept. of health alleges that the procedure for making copies of birth certificates is to take the
binder where the birth certificates are stored and open it up to the one they copy, place it face down on an
ordinary copy machine and simply copy the document to green security paper instead of white paper.
Ghen that this is the normal procedure, I see no reason for the white halo. I have seen many other birth
certificates from Honolulu in the year and a half that I have spend examining this issue of forgery, and can
attest that none of those other birth certificates from Hawaii had a white halo.
3.
If'
Twin
Tri let
f Bll1h: Otyt Town or Rural LoCation .
.
'
w~
_let
::, r
Honolulu
~
'"I
:i
6085
Kalanianaole H gl
page 3
APX047
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 51 of 437
Shown below is what we should have seen if the birth certificate original form was
actualy copied to the green security paper and we would see no white halo. Copiers
do not print white, which is the only way white could be seen anywhere over this
green security paper. I was able to purchase this special paper on the internet. The
green color and hash marks are dye printed through to the other side. In other words
the paper is green on both sides and there is no white anywhere .
. BA ACK
-
Thia Bit1h
eEJ
If 1V
Sia
Twin
Tri letO l1tO
of Bir1h; Oty, Town or ltw..-al Loe-.tion
Honolulu
Honolulu
Addren
6085
f-m~
Kslanianaole High
lr~.
of F*ther
tACK
page 4
!-----
HUSSEIN
-----~~--
APX048
USCA12
Case #14-5327
Paragraph
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 52 of 437
To answer the question as to how the white halo happened, I show the example below.
On the left is a copy from the White House release. On the right is my example of a
computer created halo. I have put a white halo on paragraph 11 using the unsharp
mask filter found in Adobe Photoshop. The settings I used
are seen here to the right. As I see it, the forger made the
forgery on a computer, used a scan of the security paper
and included it in the file with the other elements of the
forgery. Then after flattening all the layers, applied the
unsharp mask filter to sharpen up the soft edges of the type.
'
The forgers serious mistake was to flatten the layers before
applying the sharpening filter. This filter that I have been
using for 22 years chokes back the black edges and leaves
Amount: 500
-..am "-"' ::
white to create a sharper edge. You see it everywhere even
pixels
Radius: 2.4
around the form type and rules. There is no other way in
s::
mm::az
graphics science to create the white halo seen on both
Threshold: 45
levels
documents below, the forgers and mine. Proof of forgery.
;u: ...
._,._-
4.
Wi~chita
Aana~JI;_:.
"". .8 - page 5
ltiichita li.ansas
APX049
Cou
f:~
USCA Case
Paragraph
13#14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 53 of 437
To view a closer and better look at the comparisons shown in paragraph 14 of the
deposition, see below still showing the original PDF released by the White House on the
left against my own example of a computer creation of the white halo seen on the right.
BARACK
BARACI<!
Hono
Hone
~~e
..
Honolulu
I
Kalanllans
iling Addreu
a
r Father .
Fathe~
Btl
.....
page 6
APX050
;.,.;
1.
AN
Paragraph
USCA14
Case #14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 54 of 437
The chain of evidence for the white halo is proven with this enlarged section of the
Associated Press purchased print referred to in Exhibit us 1 & 2" that came from the
Xerox copy made at the White House of one of the two originals sent from the Honolulu
Dept. of Health, according to the description made during the news conference at the
White House on 27 April 2012. The White House black and white copier would have
normally dropped out the green security color background along with the white halo.
However I found that by darkening the background of the Associated Press copy, we
are still able to see reminents of the white halo. This shows us that the white halo must
also be on the original sent from the department of health in Honolulu. We now have
new evidence on this issue when a Los Angeles law firm requested that the Honolulu
Dept. of Health confirm that what is currantly downloaded from whitehouse.gov website
is thier document. See the next paragraph 15 of this affidavit.
E
CERTIFICATE OF LIVE E
OF HAWAII
BARACK
3.
1
HUSSEIN
-
.......:
4.
Honolulu
Ifalanianaole Highway.
, East Afri,c a
page 7
12a.
APX051
USCA Case15
#14-5327
Paragraph
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 55 of 437
The first picture at the bottom left is a section of the original PDF file released on
whitehouse.gov on 27 April 2012. It represents the color appearance we have been
looking at for 1 1/2 years. The middle picture at the bottom center is a section of the
document sent to the attorneys for the Mississippi Democratic Party in Taitz et al v.
Democratic Party of Mississippi No. 3 : 12-cv-00280-HWT-LRA (S . D . Miss .) See
attachment "C", the letter from the registrar of births for the
HUE/SATURATION FILTER
Edit;
[!.!_a~~-~-- r:~
Hue
S-lturtt oon
+80
Ughtoeu
+51
~Preview
LEVELS FILTER
cttm~
evan
lnputlevtls 36
:-~
1 . ~2
the altered PDF file that we must assume came from Onaka.
25S
~OK'J -~:
t'~ l
'~~loai:~) j
(
:_)!
Save ..
.--,
Auto
.:
{ _9ptron! ::.:)
the center photograph. These settings are seen in the 3 boxes "'--------------.;.:.;...;.;;~
BLUR TOOL
at the right that resulted in my own match of Onaka's effort
to change the evidence. My conclusion is that the PFD file
was altered to eliminate the white halo by actions taken at
the Honolulu Dept. of Health so as to hide the error that
' 0
History
...
<111
._Act ron~
SAME SECTION OF
ALTERED VERSION
~
@
Doe'"
~..
~
iI
l~ve l s
Blur
1I
ChUd" Flnt
BJ
BA!
BJ
s.
a.
3. Thia
Thia
[]
~.ale
- Kapiolani Matt
page 8
APX052
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 56 of 437
:?:l:t~~-'--- MyCom~0~Jf~=29,2013
Notary Public
page 9
APX053
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 57 of 437
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit A
APX054
EXHIBIT
" A ''
Document
#1550250
I)~'" iter-
Filed: 04/30/2015
EE 6
L"t'rtilic:~tc
aa
eIe
11
6 V:
A
s
~~~.~c~:~ A I
n n S -'~ U !~~:"~:::::'::'r:~~o;::s1/::l11St'
~~::;:;SS tt YY; i K:U
IN
fmmdlkr'"t.lodlmc."nt'. :-.illtclheuc
~:~~-.::~~~~
The.c 1..-uer'
HUCt'rtijical"s""stSraig/E"
offors:~ry.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
lb.
BENTCAP"H"---+
61 1064.1_
Jlt'BER 151
Middle Name
HUSSEIN
/ /'
-+
OBAMA, I.I
s.
D:!y
ll!onth
Birth
Dale
9.
25
11.
ot
Yeu
August
OBM-11\
se of Faftaer
Page 58 of 437
Race o Falher
Afric.?.n
Uaual Occupa!Jon
12b.
Student
Un iversity
STANLEY
15.
rse
of Mother 16.
r---
Cauc~.s~
DUNHAM
Birthplace (hi
18
Male
'Kapiolani
TIIC" "hate halo. -ccn nn the nnhiiC" While Hnu~ rdca'e 1s" ''hice 11uthne
amund "'""nhin~ ""the tunh .:crtili.:.lto:. 1\" ,11hcr birth ccrtilicatc ha' thi, . Sc.: ll un E:duhit"A" bclu\\
& E:~.hibil w _,IJowmg huw 11 'huuld lnul; . This,,.,.. cau.c.J by the r\dubc Phntn~hnp filter u...:tlto
~harpcn c.l~c. It .Jo..:' 1111' by chtkin~ bad; the eJ!;e lca\ing .1 while haln. We .hnw in Exhibu .. (' ..
hnw we di.J the .amc thing tu uur sp.:.:imcn example. The Hawaiian Dept. 11f He.tlth j,. 'uppn..:d In ha\c
put she uri~inal birth L'Crti!ic:.lc un a .:opicr and printed In a "pccial ,;n:cn '1:4-'Unly p01pcr in,tc,l\1 nl "hile
p01pcr. Tire nly n:,.uh JIL"'ible frum that jo; E.\hibit "B"', .~'OTc.\hibit "A". The haln pn"c" lho~tthe
JurJ;CI CunhincJ .t -..:.111 nf !he ....-.:uri!}" p.tpc:r un I Cnmputo:r ... 0o~UcncJ .11J11( lhc cfcmo:nl\ Ill the file Jtld
then :~pplied 1~ l 'n,h.lrp ~1 .. ,1;. 1!1' c\cn nn she b1nh L'Crtllk:.le .11lll\e ... -.cc upper left curncr <;u\~'C
tht' I' a ol1r..'\.t '"l'~ nf th~ b1rth ,-,n,ll.:atc -.cnt (mm H:tw:ut. !boll pru\e' !he \Oohlle h.1lo wa' on \\h.tt
the y ~-.p1c.J. '" \\C lnll\1 '"umo: the lla\\o~it:ulnri ~;ltul h"' it.1l"1 Tlris is prooftiffors:uy.
None
6. Irregular letter Spacing
The nri!;inal lucallnns uf 1hc tw nlcller .:nmbm.JIInn' l>cln\\ :~rc
marlt:<l with a hluc IIUthnc. The~ arc J"'' "'me nf the cnmbtn.lllun'
th:~t ary in the ra"C bc:t\\ccn lhe lcncr. Tltese spaces slrould be
equal. 1101 diffennt. sm.-clhc ui.J mnnn-,pao:ed l)pc
wnteN always mowc.J a 'pcc1ll.: o~mnunl alter
..-...:h lcllcr wa' t)pc:J . \\'c fccltll.ltthe furgc r.
""'cmbhnJ;lhcc lcllcl\ m.~nuah on"
.
1
cumputo:r O:liUI<.I nul 1\:"flltllc th~ cx.1ct 'P'I II!;
that tbc uld l~lo: m\:"dwnlc.lll~pc\\fll<"r'
.
~
pnx.lu.::.-..1. Tlris is proof offot"J:t!ry.
an
1
0 al',!
1.
al' an
i
an
~c ~P er rq. 41 an
t::.
1~-
BAR1
Congress failing to investigate this forgery is neglecting their constitutional "Duty to Object':
A PX O!it\
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 59 of 437
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit B
APX056
'' ''
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 60 of 437
From: orders@replayphotos.com
Sent Wednesday, October 05, 2011 9:37AM
To: putnam@motionsystem.com
Subject: Replay Photos Order Shipped
Replay Photos ard the Replay Photos Logo arc registered trademarks of RcplayPhotos.com.
905 'N. Mair Street. Suite 23C Durham. NC 27701 Ph. 877.421 .2300
o:
Thomas Putnam
ubject: Payment Receipt: 89067 Confirmation from REPLAYPHOTOS COM
APX057
Document #1550250
'' ''
From: REPLAYPHOTOS
II
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 61 of 437
pa e
C0~1
REPL~ Y
or your credit card statement as REPLAYPHOTOS COM. To contact us. please send ar e-rnail to
orders@replayphotos c om or call 919-688-21
no
Receipt
Transaction Time: Oct 05. 2011 09 38 AM
Gateway 10:
51243
Receipt Number:
134 2168417. 4 1B 1
Sales Order Number:
89067
Transaction Type:
Mail/Phone Order
Authorization Code:
295471
Billing Information
Name:
Thomas Putnam
Company (Optional): ~~1otion Systems
Card Type:
Card Number:
AM
xxxxxxxxxxx3099
Order Details
Quanti
mnltrans
DeKrl
on
APX058
Unit Price
SubtDIIII
16 .00
US Dollar Total
16 00
16.00
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 62 of 437
ta.
lb.
(Type or print)
Thia Birth
lc.
---
If Twin or Triplet,
So.
W na Child Born
Birth
IstO 2nd0 3rd0 Date
4.
Male
LDsl N11me
OBAMA, II
HUSSEIN
'.
Year
Day
Month
August
1961
Oahu
Honolulu
Nome of Hospital or ln&titution (If not In hospital or inatitution, give street addreaa)
6d.
R~eidenee
7b.
Honolulu
Yea~ NoD
7c.
lalnnd
9.
,\ge
HUSSEIN
Birthplace- (lsl:lnd, Sgze
or Fnreisn Coun~ry)
of Father
11.
25
13.
15.
STANLEY
12a.
ANN
12b.
C)
Student
....
University
Race
or
l'tlother
Caucr-.sian
DUNHAM
None
18
/17 /)
Parent 0
(/~ Oth r
18b.
M.D.
rrud?;,?;
22.
Other
Date of Signature
9'" 7-(,/
l9a.
23.
.. .
African
Usual Oecupolion
No~
YesO
Roce o Father
OBM1A
14.
Honolulu, Hawaii
Oahu
Street Address
BARACK
1061~
61
151
Middle Nome
BARACK
Sex
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
19b.
f;
Date ~r Sipature
r; ~(
I}
APR 2 5 I 2011
-'1
APX059
'""f""..-.P~
"j-)\,.......
'
n .,),, o
STAtE R'EGISTRAR.
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 63 of 437
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit C
APX060
Case
3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA
USCA
Case
#14-5327
Document Document
#155025035-2
Department of Health
1250 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
Filed
Page 1Page
of 1 64 of 437
Filed:06/06/12
04/30/2015
STATE OF HAWAII
VERIFICATION OF BIRTH
Recipient of Verification:
The original Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II, is on file
with the State of Hawaii Department of Health.
2.
........................................................................................................
C/c~
. -. . .
--
.....
t;;i\ \(/
r- ~' .D . I ' v
APX061
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 65 of 437
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit D
APX062
http://us.mci257.rnail.yahoo.eornlmc/showMessage?sMid=I2&filterBy=&...
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 66 of 437
YAHOO' MAIL
Classic
Re: binder 11 ...
1051324...
1051324...
1051324...
Dear Paul,
I think you have proposed the most probable scenario based on the creation and file dates of the
associated court documents.
1. The paper copy of the Tepper to Fuddy 3-page letter was dated 05/26/2012.
2. The electronic version of this 3-page letter appeared on Scribd on 06/06/2012
3. The Tepper four-page electronic document 10513240131.pdf (same as 35-1.pdf) was created on
06/04/2012 and was last modified on 06/06/2012. Pages 1-3 of this document are the 3 electronic
pages of the Tepper to Fuddy letter that appeared on Scribd on 06/06/2012. The 4th electronic page is
the Tepper page 4, lFCOLB. This four-page document was filed in MS on 06/06/2012.
4. We really don't know when the Tepper page 4 lFCOlB was created.
5. The paper copy of the one-page Onaka to Tepper verification letter was dated 05/31/2012.
6. The electronic version, which is court document 35-2, was created on 06/04/2012 and was last
modified on 06/06/2012. This one-page electronic document was filed in MS on 06/06/2012.
I believe that the most likely scenario is that Tepper created a paper copy of his three-page letter to
Fuddy on 05/26/2012. He attached a paper printout copy of the original WH lFCOlB and mailed this
four-page paper copy to Fuddy.
Tepper and Onaka then collaborated to alter the WH lFCOlB to create the Tepper page 4lFCOlB.
On 06/04/2012, Tepper created the documents 10513240131.pdf (same as 35-1) and 35-2.
He then filed the two documents 35-1 and 35-2 in MS on 06/06/2012.
We really don't know the individual actions of either Tepper or Onaka with regards the modifications of
the WH LFCOLB PDF image file to create the altered lFCOlB PDF image file. Onaka may have modified
the WH LFCOLB and then sent the altered PDF image to Tepper as a one-page PDF image file. There is
APX063
I2/4/20I2 3:I3 PM
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 67 of 437
nothing in his verification letter that indicates that he attached this altered LFCOLB to his verification
letter. However, his letter does refer to the LFCOLB copy that was purportedly attached to the four-page
request letter from Tepper to Fuddy.
Alternatively, Tepper might have had someone else modify the WH LFCOLB PDF image to create the
altered PDF image. That might explain why the META DATA was not entirely erased from his four-page
electronic document. We know that a scanner was used so Tepper's forger would have had to have
some means of re-sizing a scanned and altered image of the WH LFCOLB back to the correct size to
match a real1961 Certificate of live Birth printed form.
I am now certain that the 21 added objects which are invisible in Adobe Reader pre-existed before
06/04/2012 as a separate PDF image. The 21 objects include 12 line segements, 2 broad-line strikeouts
and 7 Black redaction rectangles. This ~~redaction" page is smaller than the LFCOLB image page size. I
have successfully separated this smaller "redaction" image from the flattened and altered WH LFCOLB
image in both Adobe Illustrator CSG and lnkscape. I have attached my latest screenshots from Adobe
Illustrator as proof. The screenshot [105132401131_ss3.jpg] attached shows the "redaction" page slid
off the LFCOLB image page to the right. The background of the redaction" page is transparent.
I/
So an alternative scenario would be that Tepper had his forger modify the WH LFCOLB and Onaka
provided the "redaction" image to assist Tepper's forger re-size his scanned image. This would lessen
Onaka's involvement with the creation of the fraudulent LFCOLB Tepper page 4 LFCOLB.
So scenario A would be that Onaka did the deed and scenario B would be that they collaborated to do
the deed.
Either way they both are guilty of attempting to pull off a bait and switch on Judge Wingate. They
substituted the Tepper page 4 LFCOLB for the WH LFCOLB and didn't tell Judge Wingate about the
switch.
I can provide a notarized copy of my sworn affidavit whenever you need it. Also, I can provide any of my
screen shots as required. I would prefer not to testify because of personal reasons. I also believe that. if
I were to testify, then I would quickly become a "punching bag" for the defense because I don't have an
IT certificate and I have never testified as a forensic expert.
Sincerely,
Henry
From: Paul lrey
_ _ _ _ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7763 (20121204)
APX064
~
of3
12/4/2012 3:13 1
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 68 of 437
Plaintiffs,
v.
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Exhibit 17
APX065
https://us-mg5.mail.yahoo.com'neo/b/message?fid=Inbox&sort=date&ord ...
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Christopher
Page 69 of 437
lProfile
Sign Out
Home
~"""'""';:....__...._.::u
"Paullrey'' <paulireysecret@gmail.com>
6 MB
1 t.JB
JPG
Save
JPG
JPG
Download All
439KB
JPG
Save
284KB
Save
JPG
1 t.JB
JPG
Save
1 t.JB
JPG
Save
513KB
Save
JPG
396KB
Save
JPG
332KB
JPG
Save
312KB
Save
JPG
244KB
Save
JPG
282KB
Save
257KB
Save
Chris,
I'm ready to testify tomorrow if needed.
I finished everything with exhibit 7 ... so I don't have to outline what I want to say.
Just print it out and give it to any judge willing to take it ... read it ... or hear of it.
The judge that can take this testimony in court would be very brave.
I want them to realize that I put a copyright for a reason.
I want them to know that after they deny it's existence ... the world may see it and we will declare what judge covered his eyes ... as in "see no evil".
I will publish it somewhere ... along with a lot more when that time comes.
20 points of forgery that 130 federal judges were afraid to even read ... or admit they read it .. . is enough for me to know that we were taken over
already and this is just an exercise in futility against a pack of cowards willing to sell out their nation and stonewall the most obvious truth of the crime
of a man pretending to be the president of the US ... standing on a forged document. That is a very serious crime in a sane world.
Even Johanna will not get arrested for an in your face forgery.
The judge who will admit the birth certificate is a forgery does not exist.
I think they will just go through the motions until gov. tells them which rubber stamp to use.
My principal point now is that we have found the forger.
I have hammered that issue hard.
The evidence is overwhelming because of her stupidity ... but that won't matter.
Judges seem to be specialists in avoiding the truth ... instead of finding it.
Exhibit 3 attached had a few changes I made today .. . so use the new one attached to replace what you have.
All the Exhibits are attached.
exhibit 7 is more text than usual because it's a 2 page summery with pies.
And that's it. Coming to you now for review at 4:1 o am.
I have included one support document for exhibit 7 .. . a sample birth certificate. I will have more when I get the mail from Doug.
Review them and let me know how to attach them to the affidavit because I never got the e-mail in text form and can't open the Microsoft Word.
Tomorrow I will send you my study of the copyright form.
Simon and Shuster has a copy of what they sent the US Copyright office originally ... I'm sure ... but will they play traitor like Kapioloni Hospital ... and
refuse to even tell us what country it says he was born in.
See how many people help out ... or are afraid.
After all ... there are 2,000 forensic examiners in this country ... and all are afraid to look at it also.
Except for Reed Hayes .. . but do we have his report? Why did he allow secrecy?
APX066
l of2
6/23/2014 2:43
https://us-mg5.mail.yahoo.com'neo/b/message?fid=Inbox&sort=date&ord...
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 70 of 437
Media isn't allowed to say he exists ... even though he says "It is the most flawed document he has ever seen"' also ... he says it is "definitely a
forgery."
Big news really. But it was the best proof of TOTAL MEDIA CONTROL we have seen so far.
And that is an accomplishment for my purposes ... which was to force them to overplay their hand.
Paul
APX067
6/23/2014 2:43PM
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
.Ju, IIIT\<'111
\\:\\
\"r('.IIL'LJ
66 Bj
11
aa ee
-LI EE s
u
'
.
.
:
.
AA n n Kl' U HUSSEIN
fltiJtorScnp"/1".\ ulltllisbirth
ccrtijic:alcart .llrtri~:ht.
typ<"\\Oicr kt:t"f
*"
(Trrc or print)
ISla~tle[]:
-~~-...;:
'I'~
o..
.tALTH
61 10641.
Last NIUIIe
lc:.
OBAHA, II
"'
-:o:~
_I
\l'aa Child Bam
T Binb
Triplet O ilatO 2nd0 3rd01Dw
tn O
:.L:
.
DEPARTMENT
.~~~au 151
/
lb. llllddlc Name:
T ..
//
l!ENTCAP~H"--7fHUSSEINl
,/
'--~- J.ii&--V
BARACK
(
~e
Jlllfll lluluDc.-pto!Hc.tlthL'UilldJc:.rdcrl
thcy,, :ulledlnpm\tdethclmth .:crllfi:tc
11f1rATE oF HAWAll
.... t...
II''"~"'
1~
:i
Ss tt Yy 1_).
lla
l...J
h t-..~nt
Page 71 of 437
August
Dar
Yur
4,
1961
I Sbo
Hout
I ?:24 P.M.
l'l~c u( lllrthr Cit,-, Town or Rura~ SEE iHE DIFFERENCES IN THE SPACE FROM 6 b. Jaland
l
~onoluP-u ~E WORD 1'0 THC BASELINE OF TIIC FORM
Oahu
~~ .... of liO.iJtal or lnlltullon (If
In
or inlltullon, she atrut addrat)
h Pla(e of Birth lnalde Oty or Towa IJmil.af
16d.
lllot ho:raJ
~..
6085
Kalan~
Oahu
17e..
anaol e Highway .
>E--
_t_
~:~t~!ocJal dtatrtc:a
7co lAuntyand Stale or forelp Countrr
Honolulu, Hawai_:i_ _
"'h.J'"
2P'fAS
-a.
BARACK
~~dh~u
'~
No~
25
Ill.
9,
Afric?D-
OB{Il1A
HUSSEIN .(-
STANLEY
[A1e of ~lolhrrll6o
1s
"tala
Kapi olani
of Father
S:kuqe~!-
!!niv;:e~it~
~-~~~~~~~
Fu~I~I~M~~~
-d~tn~Na~m~eor~~~~CJt~h-tr-----4-----~~~--~-------15.
Rae~
ANN-E,_
\olichita 1\am[as ~
~
.m: flu,h '"the !.:ft '' ~ ll ' fll >:t ou, . -"" tl/lscr
bir1l1 urtifit"illl' rxlribll'< t/ti( fllCII Iinr "'.'"It.
Cauc~aian
DtlNHM-1
14. ~e~h~e-r--~~------------
/\'I Urn, /J
Ncne
Oloil<h th(' (orrn hnC' ' " ' ' ""' nu, \lol' <' qiJJi l<lll l " '.all
lurm m:~J(.' lurt~pcnlt'l'> \\"c '":rc un.ahk- II hnu
.tn11lhcr huth t:t11f IL.dC h11rn llol\\ an "tlh unc ,c n hoc
r;:."tn}! hll' 1h1' .. u, 1)ptttritcn t/11 nnt tf11thi.~
fh.: L\hitc 11.1111.\I.'Cn ''" th;.unltnc Wh ite lluu'-C rclt:." '-' j, a \\lute
11\lthnc uroun..l C\c-rt ln n:.: .. n the b irth -.. rllli<:ottC. N<> utlu:r birth ;.crllli.:ate h.t' thl' . S e c tl un
Exhibit "".\ "" hd"" & E 'lulul ""B"' ''k''' mg h11w II 'hnul,flnoli: Thh "'' .-u .. c.r 1:1~ the :\Int...
Phntnshop Iiiie r u -.:J tu ,h,upcn c Jg~...,. It d>c" thi' by .:hnl.in" b.J.:I. the eJ~c leu\ in!:! u ~' hite
h.tln We ,rum in J :~:hihit '"( " ' hn l\ \\C Jid the -.,me 1hmg tu uur ,pcdm.-n clL:unplc . Tit;., pmt't'.,
Jt~~ry he,:;:"'' the ll ot\\ otilolO Dept. of Hc.tlth '" '"PJ"~<-cJ h ha1c put the uri~111:tl b1rth ~.crtilicale
un .r ~1 p1cr .mll pmllt:d tot he ,pcd.l green -.c.:unl) p.tpcr m'lc.td uf \lhite potpcr. The on I) rc,uh
P'"' ibl.! lwm th :tl '' b .luhr t " B"
:'\OT ~:~htbll "A". The h.tlu pnwc" th.tlthe li>recr .:umbrned
.1 ..._..tunl the ....-..- u. it) p oi JI.:I u n a ~ mpuh:r .. . ll.tllcncJ all ul the clcmcnh 111 the !lie and tho:u
.r pphcd the ln,h.tr(l ~~.1'1. ft lL C\ efl nil the htrth ccrtllic.tle .Jb.l\C ... 'L"C ll(lpcr
lcltcom;;r Sm~. c thi' i' o1 Jin:.:t .:up~ nf the birth ccn . \1.'111 fnllll ll.tw.tii .. . tha t pnwe .. the
\\lute h.1lu u '' on '' ho.~l th.:~ ,np:o:.J. '" \\ c Jt\U\1 .t"ume thl.' II a\\ ou i.m ung rnal h.t, il at"
nier
qlan
~ erdlan
nl. ~n
Eltltlblt A ~g.:~~~~:c Exhibit B ~~r: ~~~~ u r.uro Exhibi t c ~:~: ,~:._ o~ppt,l!d
:_ BARACK~ --t~BMMGK~~
t_: BARACK--..f- ~.
-----'
-~=:-
an
en e1n
icalan
ic an
APX06R
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 72 of 437
151
le.
Middle Norne
BARACK
Sex
Male
3.
Tba BJrth
Twin or Triple&,
Child B()t'O
2nd0 3rd
STftt'dGH f
~ fllFR
Sa..
Bbdt
D.a.te
1\lonth
August
Hfi~:T
~-E ~ -~ E~~
STHAlf;nT
-
1 1~~ -z
Lq
Close up
of two
typewriter
keys stuck
together.
Colored
red for
clarity.
APX069
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 73 of 437
STRAIGHT
CAP~D
"H''
Found in locations 1b and 7d
on the Obama birth certificate
HU
U HU
HU
HU HU
HUHU
APX070
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 74 of 437
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
fiLl
HUMilR
lc.
A Kunawai Lane
AH 1NEE
KAOHU
nhpl~f' (hlan4. ~lut or f~"l f-tf')')
Honolulu Oahu
61. 09945
151
Chief Reefer
APX071
La.t Name
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 75 of 437
FILE
NUMBER
Cblld'e Fir'JII N.n1e
1b.
(T,-pe or prlnl)
151
le.
Middle Nan1t
Month
August
Kalanianaole Highway
HUSSEIN
OBM1A
APX072
Dar
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 76 of 437
JOHANNASOLANGESIERRAOK~HEEAH 1 NEE
FemaleAugust23,196112:37
Honolulu Oahu
29Honolulu,OahuChiefReeferSteamshipCompany
THERESAPUUKAWASNIFFENHawn-Caucasian-Korean
36 Honolulu, Oahu None
OH ~~.~~
;~;t-r. HE
,.
~~
.~ HE
OH
an c~~ Ha aw
1 AH
~E !~~. ~?~1 r)~. ~e. it ne -~~~1 ~.s wn p~
AH NJ? (: ,. -'
it ne
r. wn n.,
. .
-r..,.r :?.
_
~ ...v::.
Ho on no hu ollu
an c.; ~~ Ha aw !1- Ho on no hu ollu
an e:J Ha aw n~ Ho on no hu ollu
an
aw n- Ro on no hu ollu
an Xa s;
Ho on no
ollu
an va s1
Ho on
ollu
ollu
Type ritersdonotdothis. hisisa
lu
ilure ofthe fo ge to place own
lu
Oa ah a:)
Oa ah au
1 .
. _ l
..-. .. :,~
. .,
.'t.'~)""i.
y....... ,.a,
11-
APX073
lu
C!
.L .-
.l..J r......)
ia ef
ia ef
Oa ah as Ch ~a
Oa
ah as Ch
KJ\
KA
ea
38 sets
14 are OK ~;T:r2~/)
25 are not (black)
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 77 of 437
The premise as to why some of the letters on Johanna's birth certificate do not match
for size or angle is that the forger .. not using a real typewriter to create the forgery .
copied the typed letters from more that one existing birth certificate and pasted the
doucument up letter-by-letter resulting in a variety of letters from different documents.
It is well established in typewriter forensics that no two typewriters are the same simply
bec ause the long arms of the typebars that strike the letters are easity bent. Bending
would frequently happen when a fast typist would get two keys stuck together before
striking and 1hen they would need to be manually pulled apart ... often resulting in bending. This factor has been used many times to positively identify any particular typewriter that may have been used in the commision of a crime.
This is why the forger might have for example . picked a letter from a document with a
straight cap .. H.. and then may have used another cap "H" from a different document
where that letter was bent. I show 9 examples of this below that are all from Johanna's
birth certificate proving forgery because when a letter is bent .. it stays bent ... and does
not vary in angle at different times on a single document.
The attached source document shows
all the text as is seen on the birth
certificate ... and then this text was
the letters. The results are these 9
examples of forgery color keyed
to match the location on the
document they came from .
To the right is a
cap "A" marked
much wider
and shorter than
the "Att marked
in pink.
APX074
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 78 of 437
.c
u
....,
ora
"-E
"'....,
era
__
0 ..c
...., ....,
ra
-m
..c"'
...
0~
c
~-L
~--
: _:
'-ta
GJ
t:o
GJ....,
~t:1
0 0
APX075
JO~ANNASOLANG~~IER~OK-HE~~'NEE
USCA Case #14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 79 of 437
Oahu
KaRiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hespital
HonoluluOahuHonolul ,Hawai~
6.23AKunawaiLane
Ho~nolulu
29Honolulu,OahuChie.
TH~SAPUU~WASNIFf
~eeferStaa.mshiP.Company
Hawn-Caucasian-Korean g
J6Honolulu,OahuNone
AAAAAAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
CCCCCccccEEEEEEEEEE Eeeeeeeeeeeeaee
FFf.ffJ:IHI}HHHH11HHHH . HHhhhhhhhiiiiiiii~tiiiii
JJKKKKKKLLlllllllll
llllllllmmmNNNNNNN
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn 0000000
oooooeooooooooooopp .PRR~ij.SSSSSSUUUwwwwyy
222233366699
tA~~ Ff
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 80 of 437
~A~E OF
HAWAII
. -~
DUARTMENT Of HEALTH -,
.. 6:t 099!5..
1. The red horizontal rules show that all the typed lines are perfectly straight but we see
that the form lines are not and one might think that the form was simply not straight in the
typewriter but thats not it. The lines on the form are not perfectly straignt because of the
curve of the form into the binder. The left side curves up slightly because the form is in a
binder that does not lay completely flat. See diagram here:
of
C PcJullrcy 2013
APX077
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 81 of 437
2. This style of typing seen on both birth certificates is not normal for a fonn. What I see on the other
birth certificates from Hawaii (see examples) is that the typist pulls the carriage retum to start a new
line and begins typing from the beginning at the left margin. What we see on both of these documents
rs random placen1ent of the words or poss1bley an attempt to center each word in it's box. Other typist
do not do this . V\Jhen I typed forms for the U.S. Air Force on sin1iliar manual typewriters I would always
type rom the left rnargin and set my tab bar to jump to the next box. Everything was aligned left.
3. If you look at Obarnas form in box 6a you will see tllat if this was actually typed, the typist using an
old manual1961 era typewriter would have had to hit the space bar 20 times to create the margin we
see. To someone placing the letters down by computer. the word starts are only a matter of where
the forger decides to physically place the first letter.
4. So there are 7 sin1iliaraties between Obama and Johanna's birth certificates:
1. Both hcnc the same pa,gc d1stortion ;)t U1c lower loft con1cr.
2. Bo!h hcwe 11/Jeginning of word nwlc.Ffing aligrunenl~.
u have
TrJiy a statistically impossibility. These two documents are tied together .... obviously because ttte
sarne person made thern both using the same flawed techniques.
5. Johanna made her forgery to give Jerry Corsi because he had claimed that the Nordyke twins
had been born a day later than Obama and yet they had a lower certificate number. She forged her
own bogus certificate and inserted an out of sequence number to pretend that her number was
also out of sequence. Jerry would notice that on his own and decide that his theory must be wrong.
Here below are details of the line spacing problems. I have taken 4 lines from the birth certificate
and placed them all betow with each showing the distance from the bottom of the form box. The
distances you see vary and they should not. The form is designed for a typewriter. Pulling the
carriage return when the line spacing is set for 2 line spaces would result in a 2 pica distance
each tirne. These samples here show that those distances are uneven.
A Kunawai
ON SAME LINE
6. The photograph of
er
shows the precise gear
that controls th1s distance to allow for a
one ... two ... or three
pica verticle Ime space.
My studies of other
birth certificates from
Hawai show consistant
page
2 of 2
APX078
Lane Ye-a[)
ORIGINAL
BLOWN
UP 600%
USCA
Case
#14-5327
USA
USA7
Document #1550250
~
Page 82 of 437
THIS I.. IN AN'D ALL TH
OTHER LINES ON PAGE 2
1 SHORT
~U~A
TALL
Filed: 04/30/2015
RAzy
.2 TALL
:tVP~
10022
LEANS RIGHT
TH uyn IS BIGGER THAN TK N"
11
SHORT
llDSSAA
~HORT
4 TALL
-.
1 . ; .: .
1.
'
r-J=----
FIGURE 1
....,
!
I
I
I
i
a~ !ai:3 a~ BC:I a a a a ~a a
a a a a aaa
"a a a
8"' a~ a
ala ~a a a a aIa a a
a'a a!aa
a a:aa
1.
...
a F!f=i
a
a ~~ I
...
The vertical rules match the space for the Elite typewritten letters.
1. The "USA" under "year Born" without the date is the same paste-up not in the same line as "Barack Obama" on the 2a line "Name of Author".
2. The usA": pastecfin below are not lined up to resemble typing on a form one above the other under the Author's Nationality or Domicile
3. The "USA" shown below from line 3 is the element used in the paste-up in line 2a above and is not in the same line as "1995"
4. The line 4 use of "Barack Obama c/o" is at an angle to the "Acton, Dystel, Leon &
Jaffe" below it. And it appears that "whiteout was actually used below in the address.
APX
..,wl
WAll
STA1ill 01
TE OF Ll,fE
C.ER.Ttfl
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
l.hr
p~
K-1011-r
DP,\ITMIHT OF HALTil
Page 83 of 437
... """-
N~
W:L
~ J!
~.
Tfiplet:diJ
'$&.
...
......,.., llcwi.
Ita h
~- ~ -~~= -~ ~~r'"~CN# I p a.dq .~N fJ
...
HE~lOERSON
lllllrilo
fl'l'.
I~w ;;.:,.r
""
~ ~!J~~ 9:37 . A~~
l'ut.
13.,~ Uftl)tt 1
~!'~~!~!~..
..,...t ft>d!!!J'Itf\t
~6 ,...
1 323-.~l
>
~
0
00
0
...
. .
~4
2 ft'
l OAhU
Makiki
Street
- 1\dd.....
;Jjl
....
.~. . .. .
....-~
~~~ -
...
--
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 84 of 437
Plaintiffs,
v.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
Exhibit 18
APX081
Document #1550250
https://us-mgS .mail.yahoo.conv'neo/b/message?fid=Inbox&sort=date&ord.
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 85 of 437
Sign Out
"Paullrey" <paulireysecret@gmail.com>
"Polycentrism ." <cestrunck@yahoo.com>
To:
3 Files
JPG
Monday,
Home
14MB
5 1'1B
Save
JPG
Download All
6 1VB
Save
JPG
3 I'IB
Save
Chris,
Attached are 3 files related to the copyright form.
The 2 full pages have a typewriter forensic grid on them and indications of which typed words are not following the grid.
On a typed page using the old manual typewriters that are only typed in mono-space mode ... meaning that the carriage return would always move 6
points to the left after a letter is typed. 6 points more space is allowed for the next letter. Proportional spaced typing became widely available during
the 1960's when the IBM Selectric came into use ... and by the seventies ... it was rare for a business to use the old manual typewriters.
Document forensic examiners would purchase specially made glass or plastic sheets with grid markings on them to assure that a manual typewriter
actually typed a document ... and other things. These days software like Adobe Photoshop is used to do the same thing much easier because the
program allows one to create a grid line in any color ... at any size.
I might add that there were two types of the old manual typewriters ... "Pica" sized letters and "Elite" sized letters. The larger size ... "Pica" was more
common. Both the Hawaiian birth certificates .. . and the copyright document ... was coincidentally done in "Elite".
If all the letters on a document do not align with the grid ... only two possibilities are suggested ... the typist puled the paper out of the typewriter in the
middle of typing and put it back ... or it was not typed ... but instead pasted up letter by letter ... possibly to make a document look like it was typed ...
but the grid exposes that plan. I have attached a full graphic description of a grid on the page called ... "List of Problems".
That single fault of letters being off the grid ... found on both the front and back of the copyright form ... is actually the biggest problem and indicates
clear fraud.
The possibility of any typed document exhibiting typed letters of different sizes is also clearly a fraud.
I think the messy appearance of over-strikes of typed letters was done deliberately to make the document appear to be genuine ... but of course it is
not.
I've been down this road before ... this is a ''false instrument" pretending to be a typed document.
Why anyone would do that is obvious in this case.
As Obama's publicist declared for 15 years .... Barack Obama said he was born in Kenya and raised in lndoneisia.
Then in 2011 ... when he was forced to make a rush job on a forged birth certificate to maintain his credibility ... he did not forget the his copyright form
that asked for the country of birth and his said "Kenya".
What to do about that was simply to re-make a substitute copyright form and replace what was in the copyright office.
I wonder if Simon and Shuster also replaced the copy they had on file?
Probably not ... but we should request a copy from them to see how they would respond.
Probably like Kapiolani Hosptial did when they refused to provide any record of birth data on the premise of medical confidentiality ... and become the
first hospital ever to do that where a president was involved. The rest brag ... "This is where our president was born". Obama sent them a letter
thanking them for being his hospital of birth. It's not displayed anywhere in the hospital.
Then we have the interesting situation where the US Copyright office ... probably for the first time in history ... denies a public document being given
out.
Someone has the real one .... it was out there for 15 years ... and we can bet our bottom dollar that it declares that Obama was born in Kenya.
If we can find it ... big problems for Obama.
If this mess we came across is actually what they now have on file ... I can understand why they would refuse to give it out.
The editor that signed it "Greaves" ... had his name on the document twice. Once time it is spelled wrong. What kind of "editor'' of a publishing
company would allow his name to be miss-spelled on a legal document that he knew he had to sign? Greaves died in Brooklyn at 58 years old in
2006.
We need to know what kind of excuse Simon and Shuster will give in order to prevent us from getting a copy of this copyright from their office.
of2
APX082
6/23/2014 4:06
p~
https://us-mg5.mail.yahoo.cornlneo/b/message?fid=Inbox&sort=date&ord...
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 86 of 437
The suspicion that Johanna Ahnee ... already shown to have definitely forged her own birth certificate ... and most certainly forging Obama's birth
certificate also ... was called to duty to re-make Obama's copyright form in order to only have one forger ... lessening the chance of a confession from
one of two forgers. So not having a typewriter ... she used her collection of letters given to her for forgery from the dept. of health in Honolulu and
that's why we see all the familiar problems again ... just like the two forgeries she did already. Elite type ... letters off the grid ... tilted letters ... and
securing the original from public view.
I still need to check it for letter-spacing problems and that will wrap up the issue.
How I determine letter spacing problems is to find more than one two-letter combination and compare them to see if the space between the letters is
the same or different. I will do that next. I've been too busy lately.
I'm waiting to hear from you regarding putting the affidavit together with my evidence.
I can't open Microsoft at this time.
Paul
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris agent <cestrunck@yahoo.com> wrote:
I have done a quick analysis of the copyright forgery anomalies do they coincide with your analysis?
1. The "USA" under "year Born" without the date is the same paste-up not in the same line as "Barack Obama" on the 2a line "Name of Author".
2. The "USA": pasted in below are not lined up to resemble typing on a form one above the other under the Author's Nationality or Domicile
3. The "USA" shown below from line 3 is the element used in the paste-up in line 2a above and is not in the same line as "1995"
4. The line 4 use of "Barack Obama c/o" is at an angle to the "Acton, Dystel , Leon & Jaffe" below it. And it appears that "whiteout was actually used
below in the address.
5. I believe that the PDF has layers.
Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris
secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust
transmitting utility TMCHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK@
Plaintiff I Petitioner in NYS SC Kings Cty Index Nos.:
29642-2008, 6500-2011, 21948-2012, Strunk v. US DOS
USDC DCD 14-0995 (RJL) am the Executor and Settlor for
the Express Deed In Trust To The United States Of America,
located at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue- PMB 281
Brooklyn, New York Zipcode excepted 11238
Cell: 845-901-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws"SURETY NO MORE'' WEBSITE:http://associationforsovereiqnhomerulewithin.org/
APX083
2
6/23/2014 4:06PM
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
FORMTX
Certificate of Registration
Page 87 of 437
,.. ..... ~-
EFFE9rfvs:::elrE OF flEGISTRATION
NOV a0 \99!>
..
L)ay
PUBliCATION AS A CONTRIBUTION If thi~ work Wo15 publi.:h....J olS .1 .:tmtributitn It> d pt.ri.>dic.ll. !...:ra .... l. vr wllo....:li<'l\. s!w infttrffi.llll'" 'l><>Ut tht.
If
Numb~rY
l~ueO.:~teY
NAME OF AUTHOR Y
Baraclc Obama
Wa~
NOTE
USA
NATIONALITY OR DOMICILE
Yt.'S
(X No
Dnmicilt."d
in!~-:
OFF" YH GR
USA....QN.TH G
onymous?
RIJ;ludonvrnous?
.0 Yes [%No
~ Y1.-s ~No
DYes
1'
OR {
Cttizen or.,..
ONo
Domicill-d in~
P&CUdonvmous?
0 Y'-"5 0 No
NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP Briefly d~o~1bc nature of material crcatt..'CS by Ihis author in which copyright is claimed. T
NAME OF AUTHOR Y
Namo ol Country
0 Yc:>
0 No
OR
C'
f~
1hzcn o
.
Domaciled in~
- - - -- -- . - - - - Anunymuu~?
.
P~dunvmuus?
C Y~..-s 0 No
0 Y~..-s 0 No
Of these QUGSIIOIIS IS
NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP Bridly d~bo.. nature of m.1terial CTl-.11..-d by thi,. ;~uthor in which cupynJ;ht Is ct.-ainwd . .,
YEAR IN WHICH CREATION OF THIS
WORK WAS COMPLETED This Information
a __
tlelorct compllllt'O
th~sp&ee.
ltlSitud!OnS
5H 11\SINCt!OnS
ml.r\ltbons
ONTHE GRID
teavo tho
space for d.uu
ol birth and
ceatn Dlank
at these questions IS
'Yes." see d41talled
r\A TURE OF AUTHORSHIP Briclh J ..-Kn~ n.1ture of m;ttl.orial crco1tcd by th~.:> ;wthllr m which copyright is c1.1imcd . 'Y
NAME OF AUTHOR 'Y
rm:r TH GRID
~UTHOR'S
OnPag~
. _1995
~Yctar rn'::~J~.en
~~\!!~'=::~.
ONTtlt. GRI'D_~_.!JSA .
COPYRIGHT CLAIMANT(S) Naml! .1ml addr~ must be given C\'l'fl if the cl.llm.lnl is tht.> s.1mc .1!\
the iiJttbc.r given in spa~ 2. T
ftLir
ON TH
GRID
_ ~Nat~
__
APPLICATION RECEIVED
NQ.'L..10..19.9.5.._____ .. .__ - -
~,...
~::1
TWODE?OSITS- AECEIVEo____ __
!I!~
79 5th A9e.nae
__
------------------------------------------------------------~~~
TRANSFER If the! CL1imanll"l n;~nll.od h<.'r..m '"P.'C" 4 iJ (;m~) dificn>nl fn1m th..1Uth.,rl!;) n.,mL.J m
~"'...~ W1\f_~ () .1 .QJl ~
spa~ 2. giw ,, brid ~l.l!l!ml!nt uf how !hi.' cl.lim.lnt(s) ubt.l(nl>d own~rship
ur lhl' .:opyn~hl
~O FlJ'NO~tf~C'E't\1~
APX084
Page 1 of
~pag;n
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 88 of 437
\'l
CORRESPONDENCE
D Yes
FOR
COPYRIGHT
OFFICE
USE
ONLY
DO NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE. IF YOU NEED MORE SPACE, USE A SEPARATE CONTINUATION SHEET.
xuc::ua:cw-,.r,
PREVIOUS REGISTRATION Has n.~t:!>trauun for th~ ""''"rl.. or fur .m c.1rli...'f' wrstttl\ uf thlS work tln.'Jdy lk'I.'Tlltl.ld~ in th~ Cup~-ri,;ht Offic~?
0 Vu Gt:No U yuur JnS\vl<r is "Y~o'S; why is ;tnulhlr n,;tstrillivn bl"tnJ; ='uughl? !Ch...-ck .1ppmpri.1tc box) Y
.a. 0 This is th ...llr.~t publi>hi..'\J 1.'\Jition of. wurk prt..'\-iuu.c;ly nni.'ltn.od in unpubli!illl..od form.
b. C Thi.'l is th~ first applicaliun !Ollbmitt ...'CI by thi!l authnr a~ Olpyright rlaim.tnl.
c. 0 Thi." i:.., ch.mgtod wr1oiun u( tlw work.,,. :.httwn by sp.~.:c. h on this .tpplic.lltun.
OERIVATIVE WORK OR COMPILATION Cumplo.-tt" t:>uth sp.lo. 1>.2 .uui t.h fnr ,, dcri\';lti\-c ~-nr\:; complt'U' only nb for a cnmpilJiion.
PrtellisW1J Material ~d~o.'ntll~ .:Jnt~n.'nlstlnB work or wur~ tlwt this wurk,. b.Ut.-d un r in.cnrror.tlcs. Y
i.
. ..
..
b. Materi,Jl Added to This Work Give il bricl, gcnt.'r.ll stiltcm1..1U uf the m.ttcrial th.u hots been adili.od to this wurk.snd in which cupyright is d.limc.od. Y
-space deletedREPRODUCTION FOR t:SE OF BLIND OR PHYSICAllY HANDICAPPED INDIVIDUALS A sit;n.lturean this furm at s~n- IOand a chk in ont
of the boxes here in sp.,cc 8 coru.litut~o"S .a nan-o.cluswc- grant of J"!rmission to the Library of Consrcss to reprudure and distribute 5Ulclr f1.1r the blind and physically
handicapped 4nd und~r th .. conditions and limatatioM procrit>c'd by t~ rtc;utalk>n3 ul th~ C"pynght Office: (II copit..'S of the work ic.lt'tllifi..-d in spaC\: 1 of lh1~
appltcataon in Braille (or simil;u lilctll~ symbols); or {2) phono:-xords nnbudying a IU..ation of a reading of th.lt work.; or (J) both.
c tJ PhonorKOrds Only
b 0 CopiCS Only
DEPOSIT ACCOUNT U the rq;istrJtion fLoe is to be chAfs~'Cito o (Xposlt A(C'Ount established In the Cl'J1}Tight Offtre, giw n.1me and nurt\M of Account.
N.amr Y
Accaulll Number Y
---=Ra=n=d=om=....::H;::.:o=..:u:;.:::s:. .e::.....-=
: I:::=n~c---~~..,._-.Qllti...G'RJ]2__ ~ 597 57
CORRESPONDENCE Give MI1U:" .1nd .ddresa to whldt cnrn!SpOftdence about tb:s applicahon should b. ~'T1L
8
9
- - --"'""0NTR1;RI'D
--- ----Aiea Ccxlo and Telephone
.
{0
of th~ work idt'ntifi\od in this ,,pplic~tion ~nd that the st.lh.'TTWr.ts m.1dc
by me In this .1pplic.".:Jtlon 11r~ corrC'CI In thl. 1-..~ nf my knnwk..tK...
__M~-~~~=~~~. ,. .. -~T,
------
~Uno.
-- --- - - - - - - - -
...
ON THE; G~lf)'
1.
author
10
Typtd or printed name and d.lte Y IE tlrus. rlk.1tion gi\'I..'S .1 Jah. o( publsc.1t1on in sp.tce 3, du nul sign and submit it before th.lt dJtc.
__ _ _
~-
,___ QN.IH.~.~~~tc . .
JQ-30~5-----
Handwritten sigru~ha
YOU MUST:
MAIL
CERTIS:lCATETO
11
Certificate
will be
mailed In
MAIL TO
RfFW ol Copynobts
Dl Conoress
Wastinglon. D.C. 20559-6000
window
u.r~
envelope
'17 U.S.C. 506{e): Arty person wno knOw1nO'f makes a ratse represen'...1l1011 ol a rr.ak!tlal W:t "' the applic:abon lor copyngrn riiOISifatJCn prov!deo Jot by seaion 409, 01 "' any wrauen swement fded ., CCMeCllO'I
Wllh Ute a~bon. shall ba hnOd nol ~ore ~nan $2..500.
July 1993-400,000
Ci)
APX085
~US
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 89 of 437
CRiS BON.-.-,..
NeW: ~Or'k,: m : l()Q22. Ba~a~ Oba~a
New .Y:Qrk,. :NY. . 1.0022 Barac Obama
2.0 I.
:S.Oth
Ent:ire work exc.luding quotes
Eas:t:
20 t .East
.50th
:s:t:.ie:e:t:
:S.tr:~et
_s
=
00
~
A~AJ
~~y
95
"T
PEWRIT~
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 90 of 437
CErnUSTOPHEREARLSTRUNK
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 NYC, NY 11238
845-901-67 67 chris@strunk. ws,
and H. WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
351 North Road Hurley NY 12443
845-389-4366 hvanallen@hvc.rr.com
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON 8 Jusons Glebe,
Wendover, United Kingdom HP22 6PF
Plaintiffs,
v.
and PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION HEARING
FOR EQUITY RELIEF OF
28 USC 2201 and 2202
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
Exhibit 19
APX087
Document #1550250
https://email06.secureserver.net/view_print_multi.php?uidArray=27142l
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 91 of 437
Close Window
To
Cal Srvr/HESC@HESCNOTES
05/22/2014 11 :15 /WI
.
!
:
Please respond to
"CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK''
<CHRIS@STRUNK.WS>
foil@hesc,
cc
Subject
FOIL Request
L---------
Lof2
APX088
5/30/2014 4:32
P:
https://email06.secureserver.net/view_print_multi.php?uidArray=271421 ...
Document #1550250
,---------------------------
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 92 of 437
---
This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, please be advised that any disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error,
please destroy all copies of the message, whether in electronic or hard copy format, as well as attachments, and immediately
contact the sender by replying to this e-mail or by phoning. Thank you. Visit us on the Web at http://www.hesc.ny.gov
APX089
2
5/30/2014 4:32PM
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 93 of 437
Close Window
Subject: FOIL
From: John Fraser <John.Fraser@hesc.ny.gov>
Date: Fri, May 30, 2014 10:48 am
To: CHRIS@STRUNK.WS
Cc: Sharon Forbes <Sharon.Forbes@hesc.ny.gov>
Attach: Strunk FOIL response 5-30-14.doc
I1 John W.
Fraser, Esq.
Senior Attorney, Office of Counsel, Room 1350
New York State Higher Education Services Corporation
99 Washington Avenue 1Albany, New York 112255
T: (518) 473-1581 IF: (518) 486-6515
John Fraser@hesc.ny.gov 1 www.HESC.ny.gov
APX090
t ofl
5/30/2014 4:33 Pl
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 94 of 437
APX091
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 95 of 437
Pursuant to Section 89 (4) of FOIL, the person requesting records may appeal the denial
of access to responsive records that may exist. An appeal must be made within thirty days of
receipt of this written notice and submitted to Thomas Brennan, General Counsel and Records
Appeals Officer, HESC, 99 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12255.
Sincerely yours,
Is/ John Fraser
John Fraser
Records Access Officer
(518) 473-1581
APX092
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 96 of 437
CHrnUSTOPHEREARLSTRUNK
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 NYC, NY 11238
845-901-6767 chris@strunk.ws,
and H. WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
351 North Road Hurley NY 12443
845-389-4366 hvanallen@hvc.n.com
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON 8 Jusons Glebe,
Wendover, United Kingdom HP22 6PF
Plaintiffs,
v.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
Exhibit 20
APX093
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 97 of 437
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
Christopher Earl Strunk,
Plaintiff,
-againstJUDICIAL SUBPOENA
DUCES TECUM
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
The People of the State of New York
TO: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
WE COMMAND YOU, that all business and excuses being laid aside, you and each of
you appear and attend before the Hon. DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C. at the New York
Supieme Comt for the County of Kings at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New'--Y'I40A'Iri'4Fk --- - - - - 11201 in Courtroom #541 on the 18th day of June, 2014 at ___ o'clock, in the
___noon, and at any recessed or adjourned date to give testimony in this action on
the part of Plaintiff and that you bring with you, and produce at the time and place
aforesaid, any legally certified proof of your place of birth and the citizenship status of
both parents at your birth now in your custody, and all other evidences and writings,
which you have in your custody or power.
WITNESS, Honorable DAVID I. SCHMIDT one of the Justices of said Court,
at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11201 the _ _ _ _day of _ _ _, 2014.
APX094
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 98 of 437
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
Christopher Earl Strunk,
Plaintiff,
-against-
JUDICIAL SUBPOENA
DUCES TECUM
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
The People of the State of New York
TO: TODD VALENTINE of the NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
WE COMMAND YOU, that all business and excuses being laid aside, you and each of
you appear and attend before the Hon. DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C. at the New York
Supreme Court for the County of Kings at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York
11201 in Courtroom #541 on the 18th day of June, 2014 at ___ o'clock, in the
___.noon, and at any recessed or adjourned date to give testimony in this action on
the part of Plaintiff and that you bring with you, and produce at the time and place
aforesaid, all correspondence with the office of Attorney General and office of Governor
regarding the 2008 and 2012 General Election for President and Vice President, and
for all correspondence regarding the Board of Elections official Website documentation
and records for the posted notification of qualifications required for any candidate for
the Office of President and or Vice President of the United States for the period of 1
August 2008 through 30 May 2014 now in your custody, and all other evidences and
writings, which you have in your custody or power.
WITNESS, Honorable DAVID I. SCHMIDT one of the Justices of said Court,
at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11201 the _ _ _ _day of _ _ _, 2014.
APX095
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 99 of 437
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
Christopher Earl Strunk,
Plaintiff,
-against-
JUDICIAL SUBPOENA
DUCES TECUM
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
The People of the State of New York
TO: DAVID LOOMIS of the NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
WE COMMAND YOU, that all business and excuses being laid aside, you and each of
you appear and attend before the Hon. DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C. at the New York
Supreme Court for the County of Kings at 360 l\.dams Street Brooklyn Nev; York
11201 in Courtroom #541 on the 18th day of June, 2014 at ___ o'clock, in the
___.noon, and at any recessed or adjourned date to give testimony in this action on
the part of Plaintiff and that you bring with you, and produce at the time and place
aforesaid, all Board of Elections official Website documentation and records for the
posted notification of qualifications required for any candidate for the Office of
President and or Vice President of the United States for the period of 1 August 2008
through 30 May 2014 now in your custody, and all other evidences and writings,
which you have in your custody or power.
WITNESS, Honorable DAVID I. SCHMIDT one of the Justices of said Court,
at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York 11201 the
day of
, 2014.
APX096
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
Christopher Earl Strunk,
Plaintiff,
I.A.S. Part 47
-against-
JUDICIAL SUBPOENA
DUCES TECUM
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
The People of the State of New York
TO: ANDREW MARK CUOMO
WE COMMAND YOU, that all business and excuses being laid aside, you and each
of you appear and attend before the Hon. DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C. at the New York
Supreme Court for the County of Kings at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New York
11201 in Courtroom #541 on the 18th day of June, 2014 at
o'clock, in the
___.n oon, and at any recessed or adjourned date to give testimony in this action on
the part of Plaintiff and that you bring with you, and produce at the time and place
aforesaid, a certain official memorandums and correspondence with agents and or
members of the New York State Board of Elections covering the period from 1 August
2008 through 1 January 2010 while New York State Attorney General and the period
from 1 January 2010 through the 30 May 2014 while New York State Governor now
in your custody, and all other evidences and writings, which you have in your custody
or power, concerning the General Election of 2008, 2012 and legislation to enact a
winner take all election of president and vice president ..
WITNESS, Honorable DAVID I. SCHMIDT one of the Justices of said Court,
at 360 Adams Street Brooklyn New Yorli 11201 the _ _ _ _day of _ _ _, 2014.
APX097
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
Christopher Earl Strunk,
Plaintiff,
I.A.S . Part 47
-against-
JUDICIAL SUBPOENA
DUCES TECUM
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------1[
___noon, and at any recessed or adjourned date to give testimony in this action on
the part of Plaintiff and that you bring with you, and produce at the time and place
aforesaid, all index listings of any type of student loan applications and the actual
copy of the loan records for a student who either in preparation and or attendance at
Columbia University in New York City for the period from 1979 thru 1983 of the
person or persons using the names "BARRY SOETORO", "BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA", "BARRY ALLEN OWENS", "BARRY DUNHAM", "STEVE DUNHAM",
"SOEBARKAH" now in your custody, and all other evidences and writings, which you
have in your custody or power.
APX098
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
-----------------------------------------------------------------------][
Christopher Earl Strunk,
Plaintiff,
-against-
JUDICIAL SUBPOENA
DUCES TECUM
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------][
o'clock, in the
___.noon, and at any recessed or adjourned date to give testimony in this action on
the part of Plaintiff and that you bring with you, and produce at the time and place
aforesaid, a certain official memorandums and correspondence with agents and or
members of the New York State Board of Elections covering the period from 1 August
2008 through 1 January 2010 while New York State Governor now in your custody,
and all other evidences and writings, which you have in your custody or power,
concerning the General Election of 2008.
APX099
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
2l h /
JS-44
Rrt.VII
I (a) PLAINTIFFS
~--- - - -- ------------- - - --- - ------------ - - - - - -- -
DEFENDANTS
vS Dt..t'
l :, Ct
;.1 .,J t:..'
K trvGS'
lf_ ?tlt:>
rZJL-
. ~--, -------------------1:--------------------
.l\i(T
]..(N
f~ft::~=~~~ ~~~~tfity;;!-~~),:
Case: 1:14-cv-00995
Assigned To: Leon, Richard J.
Assign. Date: 6/10/2014
Description: TRO/PI
/Ztf Lf}
I U S Oovcmment
Plamr1rr
2 US Government
oerendant
~OR
Fcd~n~f Quesuon
{l) S Government Not
rn
a Party)
01Ve~stty
(lndtcatc: CIIIZC:nstup or
Parues m 1tcm Ill)
Dfi'T
~I
.'
.o
DYT
PTJI'
lncorpon~lcd
or PQncapal Place
0 4 ~4
Foreagn Nalson
0
6
.s
06
0 A. Antitrust
B. Personal Injury/
Malpractice
0 C. Administrative Agency
Review
D
410 Antilrust
0
D
D
0
0
CJ
D
0
)10 Airplane
liS Airplane Product Llabilily
320 Assault, Libel & Slander
JJO Fedenl Employus Uabilily
J40 Marine
J4S Marine Producr Lisblllty
JSO Motor Vthide
JS5 1\-lolor Vehicle P.-oduct Uability
)60 Other Pu-sonal Injury
RtAI Propcrcy
0
D
B
D
jlii. F.
l'ri1oncr f'clilion.s
SJS Dc:arh Penally
D
IQ 550
0
l'cr:son;;,l Property
0370 Other Fr.aud
Other
Civil Righu
Properly Righr'
Tax Suits
-------
For(citurdPcn:alty
610 Agriculture
620 Oth~r Food & Drug
625 Dru~: Related Seizure
o{ Proper1y 21 USC 881
6)0 Liquor lAws
6,10 RR & Truck
650 Airline R~gs
660 Occup:ation:d
0
0
D
D
D
D
D
D
0
D
0
SJtfcty/Hcalrh
0690 Other
PDI~nl
840 Tr:1d~mnk
Feder;~)
820 Copyrights
0SJO
sslgnmenL
OR
Injunction
Any nature ohuie rrom any category may
be scicered for this c::~tcgory of eue
O:ankruplcy
421 Appcal28 USC !58
42J Withdnwal28 USC 157
OJ
03
D
0
D
~ Order/Preliminary
SociAl Sccurit)'i
0
0
QthcrSt:Hules
400 Store Reapportionment
4JO Oanks & Bank.ing
450 Commerce/ICC
lhtcs/clc-.
460 Deport~ tion
0
D
D
0
APX 100
Ellhangc
875 Cuslomcr Challenge 12 USC
J410
900 Appeal of fcc dcrcnninalion
under equal access lo Justice
950 Con51itucionaliry of Slate
Sill lUI~
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-2 Filed 06/10/14
Page 2 of 2Page 104 of 437
G. f{abeas Corpus/
H. Employment
2255
I. FOIAJPRIVACY
Discrimination
0
Derainc~
J. Student Loan
ACT
or
(a eluding veterans)
0
D
0
0
D
D
.D
K. Labor/ERISA
(non-employment)
Disclosure Acl
IG IN
Original
Proceedlnt
l Rr:m~Ye!!
from Sbrc
Cour1
VII. REQUESTED IN
COMP JNT
Acr)
4~) HoJUlng/Ac~ommod:atlons
444 Welfare
440 Other Civil Rights
44S American w/Dls:abfficfe:sEmp1o)'IQCIII
446 Americans w/DisablllticsOther
J Remand~ feGm
Appdlatc Court
4 Rcinsfaled
or Reopened
0 N. Three-Judge Court
M. Contract
D 110 Insurance
D 120 M:uiue
D 130 MillerAcl
D . J40 NqollabJc lnsJOJmcnr
0 ' 150 Recovery or Overpymenr &
D
D
D
Erotceintnl or Judgment
15J iittoYc:rt or Overp:aymenl or
Vcttnn's Bmefil1
160 Srockbolder-s Suits
190 oriicr Conlncts
195 C~nrntt Product Llabilily
196 Francblse
5 Tnnsfernd from
Anolhcr dlstric:t
(sptdfy)
6 Mulfl discrJcC
Llllgadou
7Appcallo
District Judge
------------- .
DEMAND.$~-----------~: Checkionlyrdemand
JURY DEMAND:
Y.ES
N
CHECKJFTIUSJSACLASS
ACTJONUNDERFR.C.P lJ
The JS-44 caval cover sheet and the mform;tllon coniAined hen:'.l nell her replaces nor supplements the lihngs nnd scrv1c:c ~r plcadmcs or other papers JU n:quarcd by.
law. excepl ns provadcd by locnl rules of court nus ronn. ajiproved .by the Judacaaf Conference of the Unrtc:d Sl:ltes m Scplcmbcr 1974:u rc:quarcd for the use of the Clerk of
Court for ll1e purpose: of IOIIIAllng lhc caval docket sheet ConsequentJy a CIVIl cover she ellS sub!JlcUcd to the Clerk or Coon for each ctvJI tomplnml fa led. llslcd be: low arc lips
forcomplcung the ciVIl cover sheet These raps coancadc: with the RomAn Numcrab on the Cover Sheet
I.
. Ul.
COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST liSTED PlAINTIFF/DEFENDANT (b) County ofresadcnce Usc I IOOJao mdacalc plamllfTJS restdenl or
Wash1ng1on, DC. 88888 afphun11ff1s res1dent oflhe Umled St~les bur not orWashmgton, DC. and 9~999arplamhffts oulsadc the Umled Slates.
CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAl PARTIES Thas secuon IS compleled ~ 1f dtvcrsHy of~a11zcnsh1p was selected as ahe Bam of Junsdac110n under Section
II
IV.
CASE ASSIGNMENT AND NATURE OF SUIT The ass1gnmen1 of n JUd&e to your case w11J depend on the category you select thai be3t represenls the
l!.!1!!l!!!Y cause of acllon found in your complaml You may select only.!! calegory You~ also select~ correspondmg nalurt of sual founcf under
lhe calc gory of case
VI.
CAUSE OF AcTION Cue the US CIVIl Stalule under wluch you are filmg and wnte a bncfslalcment of the pnmary cause.
VII r.
RELATED CASES. IF ANY If you mdicated that there IS a related case, you must complcle a related case fonn, wh1c:h may be oblamc:d from the Clcrks
Office.
Because oflhc need for accuralc and complcle Jnfonnalion, you should cmure the accuracy or the mfonnalron prov11kd pnor 10 sagmng the form
APX 101
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
----------------------------------------------------------------x
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 NYC, NY 11238
845-901-6767 chris@strunk.ws,
Case No.:
,
JUN 10 2014
G~ir~ U.S. Olatrlct & Bankruptcy
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE by
JOHN F. KERRY at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY: 1-800-877-833 9
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500
Case: 1: 14-cv-00995
Assigned To : Leon, Richard J.
Assign. Date : 6/1 0/2014
Description: TRO/PI
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
NOW COMES Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris secured beneficiary agent for
debtor trust transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK Plaintiff, and Harold
William Van Allen in esse surety-indenture for debtor trust H. WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
APX 102
USCA Case
#14-5327
DocumentDocument
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 106 of 437
Case
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 2 of 27
Plaintiff, hereinafter known as the Petitioners, bring this Complaint with Petition for a writ of
mandamus and preliminary injunction for hearing the facts of the complaint for equity relief
under 28 USC 2201 and 2202, and it being alleged that there is a matter of malicious
infringement of fundamental rights of the posterity of private citizens of the United States that
inter alia under color of law is a matter of diversity by interference with a contract and judicial
process that with such wrongful acts of petjury, spoliation, concealment, intimidation, forgery,
use of false instruments, aiding and abetting the enemy while under a state of war or national
emergency, is misprision of felony, misprision oftreason and treason per se done individually
and or jointly by the captioned Defendants; and hereinafter upon information, belief and or with
direct knowledge Petitioners allege of Defendants individually and severally that:
VENUE
This Complaint with Petition regarding Venue arises under:
28 U.S. Code 1391 (b) (1) (2) for Washington District of Columbia is the district where
defendants acts of otnissions and or commission also apply with section (e) for actions where
defendant is officer or employee of the United States;
28 USC 1402 (b) for any civil action on a tort claim against the United States under
subsection (b) of section 1346 of this title may be prosecuted only in the judicial district ...
wherein the act or omission complained of occurred; and
28 U.S. Code 1400 as applies for matters involving- Patents and copyrights, mask
works, and designs under subsection (b) for any civil action for patent (copyright) infringement
may be brought in the judicial district where the defendant resides, or where the defendant has
con1mitted acts of infringement and has a regular and established place of business; and
further as with 28 U.S. Code 2401 -Time for commencing action against United States.
APX 103
(a) Except as provided by chapter 71 of title 41, every civil action commenced against the United
States shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first
accrues. The action of any person under legal disability or beyond the seas at the time the claim
accrues may be commenced within three years after the disability ceases. (b) A tort claim
against the United States shall be forever barred unless it is presented in writing to the
appropriate Federal agency within two years after such claim accrues or unless action is begun
within six months after the date of mailing, by certified or registered mail, of notice of final
denial of the claim by the agency to which it was presented; and
That 28 U.S. Code 2671 - Definitions. As used in this chapter and sections 1346 (b)
and 2401 (b) ofthis title, the term "Federal agency" includes the executive departments, the
esta~"~"~br+-tli~sh~-Hm~el~lt~s-roH'f-+tl..,.,,eF'--------
United States, and corporations pritnarily acting as instrumentalities or agencies of the United
States, but does not include any contractor with the United States. "Employee of the
government" includes (1) officers or employees of any federal agency, members of the military
or naval forces of the United States, members of the National Guard while engaged in training or
duty under section 115, 316, 502, 503, 504, or 505 of title 32, and persons acting on behalf of a
federal agency in an official capacity, temporarily or permanently in the service of the United
States, whether with or without compensation, and (2) any officer or employee of a Federal
public defender organization, except when such officer or employee performs professional
services in the course of providing representation under section 3006A of title 18. "Acting within
the scope of his office or employment", in the case of a member ofthe military or naval forces of
the United States or a member of the National Guard as defined in section 101 (3) of title 32,
means acting in line of duty.
APX 104
USCA Case
#14-5327
DocumentDocument
#15502501 Filed Filed:
04/30/2015
Page 108 of 437
Case
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
06/10/14
Page 4 of 27
JURISDICTION
This Complaint with Petition regarding Jurisdiction arises under:
28 U.S. Code 1331 -Federal question. The district courts shall have original
jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United
States;
28 U.S. Code 1332- Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs (a) The
district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy
exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between- ( 1)
citizens of different States; (2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state,
except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an
action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully
admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State; (3)
citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional
parties;
U.S. Code >Title 28 >Part IV > Chapter 85 > 1338- Patents, plant variety protection,
copyrights, mask works, designs, trademarks, and unfair competition subsection (a) the district
com1s shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress
relating to patents, plant variety protection, copyrights and trademarks;
28 U.S. Code 1343 - Civil rights and elective franchise (a) The district courts shall have
original jurisdiction of any civil action authorized by law to be commenced by any person: ( 1)
To recover damages for injury to his person or property, or because of the deprivation of any
right or privilege of a citizen of the United States, by any act done in furtherance of any
conspiracy mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42; (2) To recover damages from any person who
APX 105
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
fails to prevent or to aid in preventing any wrongs mentioned in section 1985 of Title 42 which
he had knowledge were about to occur and power to prevent;
28 U.S. Code 1346- (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, concurrent
with the United States Court of Federal Claims, of: (2) Any other civil action or claim against
the United States, not exceeding $10,000 in amount, founded either upon the Constitution, or any
Act of Congress, or any regulation of an executive department;
28 U.S. Code 1361 -Action to compel an officer ofthe United States to perform his
duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus
to c01npel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty
owed to the plaintiff;
(b) and (c) or as expressly provided otherwise by Federal statute, in any civil action of which the
district courts have original jurisdiction, the district courts shall have supplemental jurisdiction
over all other claims that are so related to claims in the action within such original jurisdiction
that they form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States
Constitution. Such supplemental jurisdiction shall include claims that involve the joinder or
intervention of additional parties.
PARTIES
I. Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris a private citizen of the United States secured
beneficiary agent for debtor trust transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
Plaintiff (STRUNK) is registered to vote with place for service located at 593 Vanderbilt
Avenue PMB 281 Brooklyn New York zipcode excepted 11238 with telephone: 845-9016767 Email: chris@strunk.ws, and recorded with the Superior Court of Georgia for Lamar
APX 106
USCA Case
#14-5327
DocumentDocument
#15502501 Filed 06/10/14
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 110 of 437
Case
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Page 6 of 27
County at BPA BOOK 30 PAGES 763 thru 800 on December 5, 2013 at 9:54AM thereafter
duly registered with the United States Secretary of the Treasury accepted there on January
21, 2014 at 4:22AM.
2. That STRUNK is the duly appointed Executor public officer for the Express Deed in Trust to
the United States ofAmerica duly recorded with the Superior Court of Georgia for Lamar
County at BPA BOOK 32 PAGES 716 thru 754 on April 29, 2014 at 1:20PM.
3. That STRUNK's duty to the beneficiaries of the Express Deed in Trust to the United States
ofAmerica with a claim of beneficial interest in and over all the public and private real,
personal, tangible and intangible prope11y within the organic UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA geographic border to safeguard and secure for the posterity of WE the People of
the United States of America in the nation given by GOD for securing each private Citizen's
unalienable rights and beneficial interest in pursuit of life liberty and happiness in perpetuity,
and with the Executor and Beneficiaries duty to this DEED in TRUST shall guarantee that all
incumbents and future candidate(s) for the Office of President or Vice President of the
United States (POTUS) shall be a bonafide Natural-Born Citizen (NBC) private citizen of the
United States agent who is surety no more to the Debtor Trust Entity in compliance with the
United States Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5. either under 12 USC 95 and 50 USC
App. 5(b) with the Military Government authority of renewed annual National Emergency or
otherwise.
4. That STRUNK is the Plaintiff in New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings
active Cases: Strunk v Paterson et al. lndex No: 29642-2008 that is scheduled for a pre-trial
conference on 13 June 2014 and Strunk v Jefferies et al Index No.: 21948-2012 tentatively
scheduled for a non jury trial on 18 June 2014 with a motion to consolidate the trials taken on
APX 107
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
submission on 28 March with decision pending, and that STRUNK has arranged the
testimony of (2) two expe11 witnesses for the trial: U.S. Citizen Paul Edward Irey (document
expert and publisher), and British Subject, Michael Shrimpton, Esq., a Barrister to the
Queens's Bench and expert Intelligence Analyst, a Consultant to the Intelligence Community
at large with the book "SPY HUNTER: The Secret History of German Intelligence" (20 14).
5. That STRUNK is an Appellant in Appeal Cases 2012-05515,2013-06335 and 2014-00297
taken from orders issued in the New York State Supreme Cout1 for the County of Kings
Strunk v NYS Board o(Elections eta!. Index no.: 6500-2011, that on 4 March 2014 the New
York State Supreme Court Appellate Division for the Second Department Judicial panel
sitting in review of Appellant's Amicus motion demand that it provide "for civilian due
uce-ss-o_fla w"
1atherthan-the-contintted-martia-/-drce-prace:ss-qf{aw-ttnder-statttto-ry-di-r~-----
authority of the POTUS Commander-in-chief over the de facto Federal and New York State
Unified Court System courts under statutory authority of 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b)
ORDERED to deny provision ''for civilian due process of law" (see Exhibit 1).
6. That STRUNK has a FOIA case directly related to the above cited active New York State
cases 29642-2008, 6500-2011 and 21948-2012, that was filed in the USDC for the District of
Columbia on November 22, 2088 with Case No.: 08-cv-2234 (RJL) to obtain the Passport
applications for Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro and having received such filed on 29
July 2010, it was determined that there were no applications on filed with DOS before I 965.
7.
That Harold William Van Allen in esse surety-indenture for debtor trust H. WILLIAM
VAN ALLEN Plaintiff (VAN ALLEN), self represented, is registered to vote with place for
service located at 351 North Road Hurley NY 12443 with Telephone: 845-389-4366 email:
hvanallen@hvc.rr.L:om.
APX 108
USCA Case
#14-5327
DocumentDocument
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 112 of 437
Case
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 8 of 27
8. That VAN ALLEN is the Plaintiff in the Election Law case Van Allen v NYS BOE et al. in
the NYS Supreme Court for the County of Albany with Index No.: _ _ _ directed by order
of the Court to seek relief in the case Strunk v. Paterson eta!. Index No: 29642-2008;
9. That VAN ALLEN is a proposed Plaintiff - intervener in the case 29642-2008 by motion
taken on submission and decision pending since 28 March 2014.
10. Defendant the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS), by the DOS
Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry as a public officer as well as the private suretyindenture for the Public U.S. Citizen Debtor Trust JOHN F. KERRY (Mr. KERRY)! located
at 220 I C Street NW Washington, DC 20520 TTY: 1-800-877-8339, with authority over the
actions of DOS agents at the U.S. Embassy in London acting under color of USC Title 8
CFR Part 214 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 1965 and related law (INA 214(b));
11. That the History of Immigration and Naturalization Agencies according to FDR's Ex. Ord.
No. 6166, 14, June 10, 1933, set out as a note under section 901 of Title 5, Government
Organization and Employees, consolidated the two formerly separate bureaus known as the
Bureau of Immigration and the Bureau of Naturalization to form the Immigration and
Naturalization Service under a Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, which was
subsequently transferred from the Department of Labor to the Department of Justice by 1940
Reorg. Plan No. V, eff. June 14, 1940, 5 F .R. 2223, 54 Stat. 1238, set out in the Appendix to
Title 5. See note set out under section 1551 of this title; and
12. Further, the US Code Title 8 CFR Part 214 falls under the authority of functions vested by
law in Attorney General ERIC HOLDER, at the Department of Justice, or any other officer
or any agency of that Department, with respect to inspection at regular inspection locations at
pm1s of entry of persons, and documents of persons, entering or leaving United States; and
APX 109
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
13. Further, functions of all other officers of Department of Justice and functions of all agencies
and employees of such Department, with a few exceptions, transferred to Attorney General.
with power vested in him to authorize their performance or performance of any of his
functions by any of such officers, agencies, and employees, by 1950 Reorg. Plan No.2, I,
2. eff. May 24, 1950, 15 F.R. 3173,64 Stat. 1261, set out in the Appendix to Title 5. See
sections 509 and 510 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure; and that the abolition of
Immigration and Naturalization Service, transfer of functions, and treatment of related
references, see note set out under section 1551 oftitle 8.
14. Defendant the United States' CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA), the CIA
Director of Intelligence John Owen Brennan as a public ofticer and the private surety-
with his place for service at Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800;
15. Defendant Bmack Hussein Obama II (aka Barry Soetoro, Barack SOEBARKAH, Steven
Dunham, Barry Obama, Barry Allen Owens) located at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington DC 2050, is the usurper posing as the POTUS Commander-in-chief while the
private surety-indenture for the enemy and or ally rebel or belligerent person BARACK
HUSSEIN OBAMA II (Mr. OBAMA) as defined acting under color of 12 USC 95(a) and 50
USC App. S(b) and the Constitution for the United States of America especially Article 2
Section I Clause 5 as to the eligibility of a natural person to assume the office of President or
Vice President of the United States (POTUS) with related law that for eighty-one years now
requires provision of martial process renewal by POTUS' Executive Order under the
National Emergency Act of 1976 (NEA) and International Economic Emergency Powers Act
of 1977 (IEEPA) and related law for authority over conquered territories, property and
APX 110
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 114 of 437
Case#14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 10 of 27
persons held as collateral by the U.S. Secretary of Treasury, Alien Property Custodian, for
repayment of the debt of the Untied States owing to its creditors;
16. Defendant the U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE at I 01 Independence Avenue SE Washington,
DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000 maintains the original and microfilm copies of copyrights.
17. Defendant the NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS by its agents with two
Chairmen and two Commissioners located at 40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5 Albany, NY
12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068 is a Quasi private entity with members of the Democratic
and Republican party appointed by the Governor with agreement of the Leaders of the
Legislature and Democratic Party and Republican Party and are responsible for the conduct
ofthe General Election for POTUS in 2008,2012 and 2016.
18. That Petitioners complain of Defendants with seven causes of action with the First requiring
a preliminary injunction as time is of the essence with imminent irreparable harm as follows:
APX 111
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
21. That STRUNK on 19 April 2014 arranged for Mr. SHRIMPTON to receive the Delta
Airlines ticket 00621810842483 that is good until 19 APR 2015 for round trip travel between
Heathrow Airport Britain and JFK Airport New York City for 17 June 2014 and return on 21
June 2014, see Exhibit 2.
22. That on 27 April 2014, Mr. SHRIMPTON applied electronically to the US Embassy in
London for a Non immigrant B 1/B2 Visa. see Exhibit 3.
23. That on 1 May 2014, Mr. SHRIMPTON affirmed his affidavit for STRUNK under NYS
CPLR 3101 (d) to establish his expertise at trial for case Strunk v. Paterson et al. 29642-2008,
see Exhibit 4; and germane herein at page 11 of the affidavit Mr. SHRIMPTON states:
20. To the best of rny knowledge and belief the DNA test was done and Senator
Obarna's clai1n to be the son of Stanley Ann Dunham could not be supported. I
eannot say- to the c(Tt:trl-tha-t--ei-the-1'-GIA or IH-A ca1ne back to n1e anti-s-ai-d-s~~
I would not expect then1 to and it would be contlary to good intelligence practice. I
would hO\vever expect to be told if my advice had led to either agency wasting ti1ne
or resources. not to 1nention the cost of a good lunch.
21. The outcome of the DNA test, as I understood it to be, was consistent with what I
knew of then Senator Obama's background. It was my understanding then, and still
is, that he was born in Mombasa in what was then the Kenyan Protectorate, on or
about August 4th 1960. So far as I know that is the internal view of both MI5 and
MI6. The President's clain1ed father was known to British intelligence in 1960 due
to his connection with the Mau Mau terrorist organization. There is no evidence
that Stanley Ann Dunham went to Kenya in 1960, that is to say she cannot have
been the mother, assuming the intelligence about the birth in Mombasa to be
correct.
24. That on 13 May 2014 STRUNK filed a Motion for Judicial Notice to all parties in interest
(23 parties and or their counsels) with a motion return date of 30 May 2014 in all the cases:
Strunk v Paterson eta!, Strunk v. Jefferies et al. and Strunk v NYS BOE et at. with exhibits
that included: the Affidavit of expert MICHAEL SHRIMPTON under CPLR 3101 (d), the
Note of Issue for the Petition 21948-2012; STRUNK Appellant's Brief for Appea1201306335. and the Redacted Express Deed In Trust To The United States O[America.
APX 112
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 116 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 12 of 27
25. That on the 30 May 2014 motion return date for Strunk v Paterson eta!. Index no.: 296422008 with STRUNK IV AN ALLEN and counsels in appearance before the Hon. David I.
Schmidt J.S.C. the Court signed a slip order acknowledging the Expe11 witness status of Mr.
SHRIMPTON, see Exhibit 5.; and although Plaintiff contested did seek further relief states:
"Plaintifffiled this motion to give notice that he has an expert. He does not seek other
relief. Notice is taken."
26. That on 2 June
2014~
London to obtain his non-immigrant Visa in order to travel to testify, and the DOS denied
such visa under color of INA 214(b ), see Exhibit 6 in relevant part states:
"Dear Visa Applicant:
;'Thank you for your interest in traveling to the United States. Unfortunately, we are
unable to issue a visa to you today because you were found unqualified under Section
214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. Under Section 214(b), applicants are
presumed to be intending immigrants unless they credibly demonstrate, to the consular
officer's satisfaction, that their economic, family, and social ties outside the United States
are strong enough that they will depart a t the end of their authorized stay and that their
intended activities in the United States will be consistent with the visa status.
"Because you either did not show strong ties outside the United States today or did not
demonstrate that your intended activities in the United States would be consistent with
the visa status, you have not met the legal standard to qualify .... "
27. On June 2, 2014, STRUNK applied with an Original Proceeding Index No.: 2014-05468 for
an Order to Show Cause at the NYS Supreme Court Appellate Division for the Second
Judicial Department to expedite preparation of the trial in 29642-2008 with decisions of two
Inotions pending, pre-trial conference scheduled for I 3 June 2014 and Hon. David I. Schmidt
declined to sign subpoenas in preparation for a trial; and was also declined (see Exhibit 7).
28. On 6 June 2014, STRUNK applied electronically to DOS at the US Embassy in London (see
Exhibit 8) for reconsideration of its arbitrary 2 June 2014 decision shown as Exhibit 6, and
in the application for reconsideration STRUNK stated:
APX 113
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
"I am CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, a private Citizen of the United States being the
sponsor for the B-1 Visa application completed 27 APR 2014 by British Subject
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON who had a confirmation AA0041FB3G with the interview of2
June 2014 having been outrageously absurd and politically biased refusal of entry with
use of S .214; and as such I request reconsideration as time is of the essence, involves a
matter of grave national security with irreparable harm that requires that I concurrently
seek relief in Washington DC USDC Court on Tuesday 10 June 2014 for Secretary Kerry
I US DOS, John Brennan of the CIA and Barack Hussein Obama the acting commanderin-chiefto show cause why it should not immediately grant the Subject B 1/82 Nonimmigrant Visa for the purpose of testimony at trial on or about 18 June 2014 and further
ordered by the Court accordingly. A timely response to this request for reconsideration is
required."
29. That DOS at the London Embassy, in coordination with ERIC HOLDER and or his agent at
the Justice Department when it reviews a non-immigrant visa application with INA Section
214(8) and immigrant intent, INA 214(b) is the number one reason for nonimmigrant visa
denials. It is referred to as "failure to establish entitlement to nonimmigrant status," or more
commonly, "presumption of immigrant intent" because the majority of 214(b) denials are
applied to intending immigrants; and that the DOS issued 6.5 million nonimmigrant visas in
2008, but also rejected 2.1 million visa applications. Among them, almost 1.5 million (70%)
were denied based on INA 214(b).
30. The Immigration and Naturalization Act (INA) states under Section 214(b) that:
APX 114
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 118 of 437
Case#14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 14 of 27
32. That despite a preponderance of evidence proving that INA 214(b) does not apply to Mr.
SHRlMPTON, therefore supports the suspicion that the consular officer was under
extraordinary instruction to arbitrarily reject the visa application to prevent Mr.
SHRIMPTON from testifying, as a malicious arbitrary act done to benefit Defendants.
APX 115
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
cause of action, that Defendant DOS and or its agent under the authority of MR. KERRY ,
ERlC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II and or their
agents denied MICHAEL SHRIMPTON a non-immigrant visa under color of US Code
Title 8 CFR Part 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 1965 and related law as
interference with the Contract between STRUNK and SHRlMPTON.
36. That Mr. SHRIMPTON appointed STRUNK as his American agent to facilitate the
publishing of SPYHUNTER in the American market in hard and soft cover, and
electronically in NOOK for Barnes and Noble, and for the translation of SPYH UNTER in to
Italian and Russian accordingly; and that STRUNK invested in attendance at the BOOK
EXPO Javits Center in New York City from 28 May thru 31 May 2014 (see Exhibit 9);
television, radio and newspapers during the time that Mr. SHRIMPTON would be in New
York to testify at the Strunk v Paterson et a/29642-2008 non-jury Trial between 17 June
2014and21 June2014.
APX 116
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 120 of 437
Case#14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 16 of 27
intended to infringe STRUNK's First amendment right to speech, publish and associate.
39. That Defendant DOS and or its agent under the authority of MR. KERRY, ERIC HOLDER,
JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II and or their agents action
under color of law to infringe STRUNK's First amendment right violates the provisions of 42
U.S. Code 1985(1) as to conspiracy to interfere with civil rights by preventing the DOS
consular officer from performing duties in that there was more than sufficient evidence that
the DOS US Embassy Consular officer had to overcome INA 214(b) presumption otherwise
was directed to deny Mr. SHRIMPTON his visa to be able to testify.
40. That MR. KERRY, ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II and or their agent(s) in Washington District of Columbia conspired to prevent
the London Consular officer from approving the non-immigrant visa for Mr. SHRIMPTON,
by intimidation, or threat of any person holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under
the United States, from discharging any duties thereof officer required to be performed. on
account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office while engaged in the lawful
discharge thereof, to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official
duties otherwise prohibited by 42 USC 1985(1 );
41. In that MR. KERRY, ERJC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II and or their agent(s) in Washington District of Columbia acted to obstruct
justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror prohibited under 42 USC 1985(2).
APX 117
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
forth at length, but omits such for the sake of brevity, and further alleges as and for the
Fourth cause of action, that Defendant DOS and or its agent under the authority of MR.
KERRY, ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II and
or their agents denied MICHAEL SHRIMPTON a non-immigrant visa under color of US
Code Title 8 CFR Part 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 1965 and related law
intended to infringe STRUNK's FIFTH amendment right to equal protection of the law.
43. In that MR. KERRY, ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II and or their agent(s) in Washington District of Columbia conspired to prevent
the London Consular officer from approving the non-immigrant visa for Mr. SHRlf\1PTON
conspired to deter, by force, intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in any court of the
truthfully~
presentment~
or
indictment of any grand or petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person
or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment lawfully assented to by
him, or of his being or having been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the
purpose of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due course of
justice in any State or Territory, with intent to deny to citizen STRUNK the equal protection
of the laws, or to injure him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to enforce,
the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal protection of the laws as a fifth
amendment infringement of STRUNK's fundamental rights under the Constitution;
44. That MR. KERRY, ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II and or their agent(s) in Washington District of Columbia acted to Deprive
APX 118
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 122 of 437
Case#14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 18 of 27
STRUNK and SHRIMPTON their unalienable rights or privileges when Defendants conspire
for the purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or class of persons of
the equal protection of the laws, or of equal privileges and immunities under the
laws~
or for
the purpose of preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or Territory
from giving or securing to all persons within such State or Territory the equal protection of
the laws prohibited under 42 USC 1985(3).
AS AND FOR THE SIXTH CAUSE OF ACTION DEFENDANTS WITH THE NYS BOE
TO INFRINGE PETITIONERS' FIRST FOURTH FIFTH NINTH AND TWELFTH
AMENDMENT RIGHT TO AN EFFECTIVE ONE PERSON ONE VOTE
45. That Petitioners as to each and every allegation contained in the foregoing introduction and
paragraphs 1 through 44, repeats such with the same force and effect as though herein set
fmth at length, but omits such for the sake of brevity, and further alleges as and for the
Fourth cause of action, that Defendant DOS and or its agent under the authority of MR.
KERRY, ERIC HOLDER, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, and BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II and
or their agents with the NYS BOE and its agents acted to infringe Petitioners' FIRST,
FOURTH, FIFTH, NINTH, TWELFTH and Section 1 Fourteenth amendment right as to
NYS BOE state action to an effective one person one vote expectation at the 2008 and 2012
General Election for POTUS by changing the eligibility qualification for any candidate
running for the office ofPOTUS from ''natural-born Citizen" to "born a citizen'" on the NYS
BOE website after the 2008 election to misconstrue the outcome of the court action in the
case Strunk v NYS BOE eta/. Index No.: 6500-2011 and having refused to reverse its
unlawful change of eligibility for POTUS as is currently on the NYS BOE Webpage and for
the full page see Exhibit 10:
APX 119
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
!OFFICE
!CITIZENSHIP !AGE RESIDENCY
!STATUTE
;.....P-re-s-id_e_n_t_o_f-th_e_ Born a citizen
r-11_4_y-ea_r_s-in- co_u_n-try_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ United States
F5
United States
Constitution Ar1. II
1
years
-+6. That Federal Defendants with the NYS BOE conspired to advocate for Barack Hussein
Obama II by intimidation, involving any citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving
his support or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of any lawfully
qualified person as an elector for President or Vice President; in any case of conspiracy set
forth in this section, if one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act
APX 120
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 124 of 437
Case#14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 20 of 27
48. That STRUNK has attempted since December 2013 to obtain a certified copy of the
copyright document from the US Copyright Office using an established Patent, Trademark
and Copyright attorney who regularly practices in Washington; and to date the agency has
denied a certified copy even though it would only cost $35.
49. The subject document as filed originally said Barack Hussein Obama II was born in Kenya.
50. The Document was change during 2008 to state that Barack Hussein Obama II was born in
Hawaii, and that the graphic techniques used are exactly the same used by the forger of the
2008 and 2011 supported Certificate of Live Birth presented by Barack Hussein Obama II.
51. That 42 USC 1985(3) and 1986 infringement of Petitioners' rights under the Constitution for
the United States of America relates to the case 08-cv-2234 (RJL) Freedom of Information
Act pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552, wherein on 29 July 2010 a response from the DOS counsel
released the Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro the first such application of 13 August 1968 (see
Exhibit 12) wherein the 1965 according to the 1968 document involved spoliation and
concealment alleged done by the General Services Administration (GSA) but STRUNK
alleges done by the DOS CIA sub-contractor, John 0. Brennan, to cauterize. conceal and or
destroy any passport applications and records for Stanley Ann Dunham, Barack Hussein
Obama II, John Sidney McCain and Hillary Rodham Clinton that proves Barack Hussein
Obama II is not a citizen; and that proof of which is that the 1965 passp01t application was
destroyed according to DOS Counsel which has a logical set of conclusions to be drawn in
favor of the DOS Counsel as if He made truthful statements.
52. That based upon the pending testimony of MICHAEL SHRIMPTON, Barack Hussein
Obama Junior was born no later than August 4, 1960 not on August 4, 1961 for which the
legend was manufactured so that somehow Junior would be calculated as born in Hawaii
APX 121
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
rather than being brought in as the child of a couple married in February 1961 in Hawaii was
created by Madelyn Dunham as the only proof by the newspaper article that was then used by
the Hawaii Department of Health to record a birth in Hawaii by the members ofthe SUBUD
cult in which Obama Junior was inducted as a member along with Stanley Ann Soetoro from
their time in Indonesia and He was given the Javanese name "SOEBARKAH".
53. There is a Customs statistical entry record of a white women and one year old black child
entering the USA from Africa in 1961 and presumed taken to Seattle Washington in August
to live with his father's new wife Stanley Ann Obama when she attended the University of
Washington; and the child was described as big for his age during an babysitter interview.
54. STRUNK contend that in regards to the document marked P1 shown in Exhibit 12, that an
APX 122
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 126 of 437
Case#14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 22 of 27
i.
j.
"[a] voter deprived of useful information at the time he or she votes suffers a particularized
injury in some respects unique to him or herselfjust as a government contractor, allegedly
wrongfully deprived of information to be made available at the time bids are due, would
suffer a particularized injwy even if all other bidders also suffered an injury."
58. These issues can be easily resolved; the documents requested will either prove that Barry
Soetoro is in fact a "natural born" U.S. Citizen or they will prove he is not, at which point he
will have to be removed as the incapacitated POTUS Commander-in-chief under the 25th
Amendment and will require U.S. Department of Homeland Security with control of the
APX 123
Bureau of Customs and Border Control to enforce U.S. Title 8 and related laws as to Mr.
Barry Soetoro, and the living person using the SSN:
-8522 accordingly in
60. The court determines whether disclosure is warranted by "balanc[ing] the public interest in
disclosure against the [privacy] interest Congress intended the Exemption to protect." Dep't
o{Jus/ice v. Reporrers Comm. {or Freedom of Press. 489 U.S. 749, 776 (1989). The public
interest in disclosure lies in "open[ing} agency action to the light ofpublic scrutiny,"
APX 124
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
WHEREFORE, Petitioners wish for the above aforementioned reasons, this Court should
Mandate and Order the U.S. Depat1ment of State to provide a non-immigrant visa, US Copyright
Office release the actual certified copy of the 1995 copyright of "Dreams From My Father" and
or agencies under its control to release documents proving ultra vires acts of defendants and or
their agents to spoliate conceal and destroy records and interfere with the conduct of judicial
proceedings and provision of justice; and that this court take supplemental jurisdiction over the
NYS BOE to immediately order the turn-over of the documents referred to above regarding the
outrageous use of the "born a citizen" term rather than the Constitutionally mandated use of the
q,
Dated: June
2014
Brooklyn, New York
~~ ~~
Christopher Earl Strunk
APX 125
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
VERIFICATION
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
)
) ss.
)
Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
I. That this Complaint with Petition of mandamus relief is directly related to the evidence
that I obtained with great difficulty here in Washington DC with the FOIA case Strunk v
DOS and DHS USDC DCD 08-cv-2234, and that as a matter of comity and economy of
schedule with the efforts related to the obtained documents for more than three years
before the Honorable Richard J. Leon USDJ that this case be assigned to Judge Leon; and
2. Executor is obligated to provide judicial notice as to the Express Deed in Trust to the
at BPA BOOK 32 PAGES 716 thru 754 on April29, 2014 at 1:20PM (see Exhibit 13).
3. I have read the attached Complaint with Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of
a Writ of Mandamus and I know its contents; the facts stated in the Petition are true to my
own personal knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on
information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my
beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows: 3rd parties,
books and records, and personal knowledge. except as to those stated upo n information
and belief, which I believe to be true.
~ F-d~
Christopher Earl Strunk
Sworn to before me
QYLThis _L_ day of June 2014
APX 126
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 130 of 437
Case#14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1 Filed 06/10/14
, Page 26 of 27
r,
VERIFICATION
STATEOFNEWYORK
COUNTY OF ULSTER
)
) ss.
)
Accordingly, I, H. William Van Allen, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty
of perjury:
While this instant civil action seeks an emergency time critical mandamus ordering the
US State Department granting of a travel visa to Michael Shrimpton, Esq for the purpose
appearing in NYSUCS Kings Civil Supreme in the matter of"Strunk v Paterson et al" pending
my intervention motion fully briefed and heard March 28 2014. I direct this court's attention to
the attached EXHIBITS #11 A-E of my own related cases now before USCA-DCC and
SCOTUS with pending stay motions - until the NYSUCS and now this court rules on the
Shrimpton appearance and his expert witness testimony. All this regarding acUudication of
immigration status using DNA including the national security implications of I to ClNC/POTUS
and executive control of all federal agencies including: DOD (Defense) I DON (Navy) I DVA
(Veterans) DOC I (Census) and especially DOJ (Justice) and DOS (State).
Ergo, I have read the attached Complaint with Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the
Nature of a Writ of Mandamus and I know its contents; the facts stated in the Petition are true to
my own personal knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information
and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all
matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows:
3rd
personal knowledge. Except as to those stated upon information and belief, which I believe to be
true.
Sworn to before me
day of June 2014
This
APX 127
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
VERIF I CATION
STATEOFNEWYORK )
COUNTY OF ULSTER
) ss.
)
Accordingly, I, H. William Van Allen, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of
perjury:
While this instant civil action seeks an emergency time critical mandamus ordering the US State
Department granting of a travel visa to Michael Shrimpton, Esq for the purpose appearing in
NYSUCS Kings Civil Supreme in the matter of "Strunk v Paterson et al" pending my
intervention motion fully briefed and heard March 28 2014, I direct this court's attention to the
attached EXHIBIT #11 of my own related cases now before USCA-DCC and SCOTUS pending
stay motions - until the NYSUCS and now this court rules on the Shrimpton appearance and his
expert witness testimony regarding adjudication of immigration status using DNA including the
national security implications to CINC/POTUS and executive control of all federal agencies
including DOD (Defense) I DON (Navy) I DVA (Veterans) and especially DOJ (Justice) and
DOS (State).
Ergo, I have read the attached Complaint with Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a
Writ of Mandamus and I know its contents; the facts stated in the Petition are true to my own
personaL knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and
belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters
not stated upon information and belief are as follows:
3rd
knowledge. Except as to those stated upon information and belief, which I believe to be true.
Sworn to before me
This _!1_ day of June 2014
APX 128
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 132 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 1 of 109
Case No.:
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Exhibit 1
APX 129
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
~rtmt
1\pp.ellat.e lliuisinn:
@>ecnn~ JJu~icialilepartment
Ml70416
E/sl
2012-05515,2013-06335,2014-00297
Christopher-Earl Strunk, appellant,
v New York State Board of Elections,
et al., respondents.
(Index No. 6500/11)
Motion by the appellant prose, inter alia, "for civilian due process of law'' on appeals
from three orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 11, 2012, March 29, 2013, and
December 9, 2013, respectively.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition
thereto, it is
ENTER:
~~~
Clerk of the Court
March 4, 2014
STRUNK v NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS
APX 130
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
04/30/2015
Page 134 of 437
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed Filed:
06/10/14
Page 3 of 109
<:ase ~o.:
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
Exhibit 2
APX 131
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
A .D E L TA
f~
delta.com
My Trips
Earn Mles
LONDON-
AR8:25pm
NYC-KENNEDY
DELTA 3
BUSINESSEUTE~
HEATHROW
(0)
Dinner
Sat21JUN
LV 8:30pm
NYC-KENNEDY
AR 8:45am
**Sun 22JUN
LONDONHEATHROW
DELTA402
BUSINESSEUTE~JO
(OK)
Dinner
**Arrival date is different than departure date.
Please note that select Delta ntghts - Including this upcoming flight- now operate from
London-Heathrow (LHR) Terminal 3. For more information about this Important airport update and
our partnership with Virgin Atlantic, visit delta.com.
APX 132
1
1
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 136 of 437
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 5 of 109
Gate information is available 2112 hours prior to your fllghfs departure via Online Check-jn .E1lgbt
the Fly Deta aoo.
~or
CD
Please note that select Delta flights -Including this upcoming flight - now operate from
London-Heathrow (LHR) Tennlnal 3. For more lnfonnatlon about this Important airport update and
our partnership with Virgin Atlantic, visit de!ta.com.
Gate lnfonnation is avaifable 2Yl hours prior to your flight's departure via Online Check-jn .f!!gbt
or the Ety Delta aoo.
Passenger Details
Fl~ghls
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON
SkyMiles #*******047
DELTA 3
DELTA402
Seats
Not Assigned
Not Assigned
If you purchased an Economy Comfort seat or a Trip Extra, please visit My Trips to access a receipt of your
purchase.
~pt Information
Billing
Detail~
Passenger:
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON
Payment Method:
AX***********5008
FARE:
USD
Taxes/Carrier-imposed Fees:
708.70
ncket Amount:
708.70 USD
Ticket Number:
00621810842483
Fare Difference:
Taxes/Carrier-imposed Fees:
0.00 USD
708.70 USD
0.00 USD
Service Charge/Fees:
Total Olarged:
708.70USD
].
APX 133
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
. M~~~ Details
- ~ --- .
-:
. .J
~cketlng
~----------------
Details
Passenger:
Ticket#:
Place of Issue:
Issue Date:
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON
00621810842483
CVGRES
19APR14
----
Expiration
Date:
19APR15
Detail~
Total:
708.70
Itemized:
fr
i=are Dit:l.~,~~'
-110.
~r-o~~....-..)1
4 .. :;--.
~~..-.;:_-,, ~
.._... :,: . . ~
......
-r
..,
'It
-~.-..s-:~
,.............,...k._..,..
.....
.
--....- .
,.
LON DL NYCO.OOCSM625/FT231 DL LONO.OOCSK1625/FK231 NUCO.OOEND ROEl.OO
:..io")C.':.~<t'..
EXEMPTX
Baggage Fees
~-~Th2mk )~9~}1J~~~~'f~\~.,.~;val}!e_c~! c ~15~~i.?r;T~,~~~ fiiC:.;: be!o'.~;5i~~ba~~:;,! , uri\ro~irl-;-rigmo1 ~ckel puid~o!~~e
~
:O~i! tfurn~?:liU!! ..if,',YOU ~tualifY)9r:, r rc:c .or di:;count::>cl- C)1ccJ;e(J l:ag~l09'> til iS .'NJII tx~ la~;t:>n rnto cKCOtJnl VJI :C'rt
~-
Aiitil)e.Rule
...
. "~-'
-~
--
Baggage
Destlna~n
Ap.,.led
-~
e."
LHR
JFK
FREE
CARRYON
FREE
FREE
FIRST
SECOND
0.00
Visit delta.com for details on baggage embargos that may apply to your itinerary.
3
APX 134
0.00
0.00
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 138 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 7 of 109
Sat 21lun 2014
DELTA
JFK
LHR
FREE :
FREE
58.10
CARRYON
FIRST
SECOND
0.00
VIsit delta.com for details on baggage embargos that may apply to your itinerary.
58.10
58.10
1
0n Delta operated flights, you may carry on one bag and a small personal item at no charge. carry-on
allowances may differ and fees may apply for tJights operated by carriers other than Delta. Contact the
operating carrier for detailed carry-on limitations and charges.
BusinessEIIte/First/Business Class weight allowance reverts to SO lbs for all checked bags beyond regular
free allowance.
At the time of check in with Delta, SkyMiles Medallion members, SkyTeam Elite & Elite Plus, Alaska MVP
& MVP Gold and active US Military personnel are eligible for fee waivers and other benefits. For more
details, visit delta.com/baggage. Basic Cardmembers with a Gold, Platinum, or Reserve Delta SkyMiles
Credit Card from American Express are eligible for the first bag fee waiver. More details on the program
can be found at derta.com/flrstbagfree.
A standard checked bag with Delta may be up to 50 lbs and 62 linear inches (per piece). Additional fees
apply for oversize, overweight, and/or additional pieces of checked baggage. Please review Delta's
baggage guidelines for details. Weight and size restrictions may vary when checking baggage on carriers
other than Delta. Contact with the operating carrier for detailed checked baggage allowances.
Do you have comments about our service? Please email us to share them.
Questions regarding your upcoming flight? Please contact us at the following:
Delta 1-800-221-1212 I Air France 1-800-237-2747 I Alitalla 1-800~223-5730 I KLM 1-800-618-0104
. DIU'A
SKYMILES'fit
Hertz-
Hlt.TOH
r4
HHONORS
HERTZ.>
MILES.>
Need more miles? Buy
TRIP INSURANCE.>
Protect your trip
against trip
cancellations and
Interruptions with
valuable insurance from
Allianz GlobaJ
Assistance.
Terms 8c Conditions
Conditions of Carriage
Air transportation on Delta and the Delta Connection carriers is subject to Delta's conditions of carriage. They include
terms governing for example:
Umlts on our liability for personal injury or death of passengers, and for loss, damage of delay of goods and
baggage.
Claim restrictions including time periods within which you must file a claim or bring action against us.
Our right to change tenns of the contract.
Check~ln requirements and other rules established when we may refuse carriage.
Our rights and limits of our liability for delay of failure to perform service, including schedule change)
substitution of alternative air carriers or aircraft) and rerouting.
Our policy on overbooking flights, and your rights if we deny you boarding due to an oversold flight.
4
APX 135
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
---------------------------------------------------------------x
Case No.:
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
Exhibit 3
APX 136
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
E~glish
Exit
Name Provided:
SHRIMPTON, MICHAEL
Date Of Birth:
09 MAR 1957
Place ofBii1h:
Gender:
Male
Country/Region of
Origin (Nationality) :
Passport Number:
508207017
Purpose ofTravel:
BUSINESS/PERSONAL (8 I /82)
Completed On:
27 APR 2014
Confirmation No:
AA0041FB3G
Location
Selected:
LND
U.S. Ernbassy
-London
24 Grosvenor
Square
London, WIA
2LQ
United
Kingdom
Version
01.02.01
--------------------------==-=-~=-~~-=---
Print Confirmation
.
Print Application
Email Confirmation
.
- . - --
..
- ---
--
...
Note: Electronically submitting your DS-160 online application is the FIRST STEP in the visa application
process. The next step is to review the internet page of the embassy or consulate where you plan to apply for
your visa. Most visa applicants will need to schedule a visa interview, though some applicants may qualify for
visa renewal. The embassy or consulate information may include specific local instructions about scheduling
interviews, submitting your visa application, and other frequently asked questions.
YOU MUST BRING the confirmation page and the following document(s) with you at all steps during the
application process:
Passport
You may also provide any additional documents you feel will support your case.
l of2
APX 137
6/6/2014 11:49 AM
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Instructions
YOU MUST SUBMIT the confirmation page with a clear and legible barcode at the time of your interview.
If you do not have access to a printer at this time, select the option to email your confirmation page to an
email address. You may print or email your application for your own records. YOU DO NOT need to submit
the application at the time ofthe interview.
Please note that you will be required to provide proof that you have paid the visa application fee and any
other fees associated with your application. There may be other fees associated with the visa application
process. Please check your country's Reciprocity Schedule for any other fees you may owe.
lfyou have further questions, or to find out how to contact the Consular Post, please go to
http://london.usembassy.gov/ or http://travel.state.gov .
NOTE: Unless exempt from an interview, you will be required to sign your application by providing a
biometric signature, i.e. your fingerprint before a consular officer. By providing this biometric signature you
are certifying under penalty of petjury that you have read and understood the questions in your nonimmigrant
visa application and that all statements that appear in your nonimn1igrant visa application have been made by
you and are true and complete to the best of your knowledge and belief. Furthermore at the time of your
interview, you will be required to certify under penalty of perjury that all statements in your application and
those made during your interview are true and compete to the best of your knowledge and belief.
You electronically signed your applicatim1 on 4/27/2014 6:01:49 PM (GMT-05:00). You were required to
electronically sign your application yourself, unless otherwise exempt by regulation, even if the application
was prepared by someone other than yourself. Your electronic signature certifies that you have read and
understood the questions in this application and that your answers are true and correct to the best of your
knowledge and belief. The submission of an application containing any false or misleading statements may
result in the permanent refusal of a visa or the denial of entry into the United States. All declarations made in
this application are unsworn declarations made under penalty of perjury. (28 U.S.C. 1746).
The information that you have provided in your application and other information submitted with your
application may be accessible to other government agencies having statutory or other lawful authority to use
such information, including for law enforcement and immigration law enforcement purposes. The photograph
that you provide with your application may be used for employment verification or other U.S. law purposes.
This site is managed by the Bureau of Consular Affairs, U.S. Depmiment of State. External links to other
Internet sites should not be construed as an endorsement of the views contained therein.
Copyright Information Disclaimers Paperwork Reduction Act
(110)
APX 138
2 of2
6/6/2014 II :49 M
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 142 of 437
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 11 of 109
Case No.:
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
Exhibit 4
APX 139
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Plaintiff,
Intervener- Plaintiff.
I.A.S. Part 47
(Ron. David I. Schmidt J.S.C.)
--------------------------------------X
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS
-----------------------------------x
Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse
Petitioner,
APX 140
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
AFFIDAVIT OF
MICHAEL
EXPERT
WITNESS
SHRIMPTON
C P L R 3 1 0 1 (d)
Accordingly, I, Michael Shrimpton, Esquire, being duly sworn! depose and say
under penalty of perjury:
blurb).
also
write
weekly
intelligence
colun1n
for
Page 2 of 15
APX 141
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Crystal City, VA in 2005 and the Intelligence Summit, at the same venue, the
following year.
Shortly after the Summit concluded the United States Navy were
Royal United Services Institute and the United States Naval Institute.
I was
invited to join British Mensa in 2012 and a1n SIGSec of their Intelligence and
National Security Special Interest Group.
Tribunal (IAT) by the then Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain, Lord Mackay of
Clashfern. The IAT heard immigration appeals frmn all over the United Kingdom,
including Scotland, and the Islands. It was both an appellate and first instance
tribunal, with legally qualified chairmen sitting with lay members, usually two.
The lay members tended to have n1ilitary, intelligence or colonial experience, but
they ca1ne from all walks of life and had varied backgrounds. First instance cases
were heard under s.3(5)(b) of the Im1nigration Act 1971 (Imp.) and consisted of
appeals against decisions to deport on the ground that it was conducive to the
public good, usually following a sentence of imprisonment for a serious crin1e, such
as narcotics tlafficking.
Page 3 of 15
APX 142
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 146 of 437
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 15 of 109
heard appeals against refusal of political asylum in the United Kingdom. The IAT
was abolished not long after I retired from it in 2005. It is right to say that I was
prevented from sitting after November 2003 and that when I resigned I was in
dispute with the Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain and Secretary of State for
Constitutional Mfairs, Lord Falconer of Thoroton QC. This is not the place to go
into the rights and wrongs of that dispute, but it flowed from 1ny intelligence work
and followed a bad faith complaint in June 2002 to my professional body, the Bar
Council, by a Citizen of the Islamic Republic of Iran, whon1 I was advised was
connected to their intelligence service, VEVAK. That complaint in turn followed
my successful representation of an officer of the US Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA) who had been instrumental in expanding the CIA's network inside Iran
after the 1979 Iranian Revolution. VEVAK, working with the Iraqi Mukhabara.t,
were involved in the prosecution of this officer, indeed it transpired that VEVAK
had an asset inside the Crown Prosecution Service, E. I was partially responsible
for the exposure of E, who was thought to have an Iraqi background but whose
family in fact came from Iran. My forn1er client had a distinguished CIA career
and was formerly a Lockheed U-2 pilot, indeed he was on the U-2 shakedown
progran1.
5. I understand that Plaintiffs intent is to call me as an expert witness, with the
leave of the court. I have been asked to 1nake myself available to give evidence in
New York on June 18th and 19th 2014. As a courtesy I have supplied copies of my
legal and national security resumes to the Plaintiff and they can be n1ade
available to the court and other parties.
attempt upon me in 1999 I have been subjected to a volley of bad faith accusations,
both professional and criminal. These have all either failed or are sub judice at
this time. I am content to supply further details if asked, but would respectfully
Page 4 of 15
APX 143
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
caution all parties that each accusation has involved hostile intelligence agencies,
usually G02, the covert German operation in London set up at the end of World
War II, and some have involved fabrication of evidence and tampering with my
cmnputer equipn1ent.
6. At the behest of Plaintiff Christopher Earl Strunk, I understand that I am
swearing this affidavit under New York State Civil Practice Law Rules Section
3101(d) as to 1ny expert witness qualifications to testify at the hearing scheduled
to be heard before the Honorable David I. Schtnidt, Justice of the Supreme Court
for the County of Kings, in the above Caption tentatively as consolidated cases.
7. I am also of the understanding that there is a related case with orders from the
New York State Supreme Court for the County of Kings with Index No.: 6500-2011
now with active consolidated appeal cases with No's: 2012-05515, 2013-06335 and
2014-00297 in the Appellate Division for the Second Department with subn1ission
pending the outcome of this matter herein.
con1plexity here and I will not pretend to the court that I have fully understood
how the various cases relate to each other, nor the procedural basis for the hearing
in June. I con1prehend at least this much, that each of the cases turns in part on
the question of fact as to whether or not President Barack Hussein Obama Junior
was born in either of the hospitals in Honolulu in the State of Hawai'i in which he
claims to have been born and the mixed question of fact and law as to whether or
not President Obama is a natural born citizen of the United States within the
1neaning of Article II of the United States Constitution.
Page 5 of 15
APX 144
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 148 of 437
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 17 of 109
intelligence community about the Senator's eligibility for the office of President of
the United States. The CIA with respect seemed to recognize my expertise within
the field. At any rate my opinion was sought, and as an ally I gave it freely,
although they paid for the lunch.
9. In addition to 1ny intelligence and immigration law expertise I had specific
expertise in DNA fingerprinting. I believe that I was only the second lawyer in
the world to make use of it, in 1985, in an immigration case, consulting Dr. Alec
Jefferies, as he then was, by telephone at the University of Leicester (I was
practising as a barrister in Leicester at the time, as a 'poor persons' lawyer in a
law center). As the court will be aware DNA or genetic fingerprinting had only
recently been discovered, by Dr. Jefferies, now Sir Alec, the previous year. I was
aware that he had used it successfully in a 'relationship as claimed' i1nmigration
case. There were n1any such cases and by the late 1990s the IAT and Immigration
Adjudicators had built up a considerable body of expertise in the field. I was well
used to considering DNA fingerprinting reports judicially by the year 2000.
10. I understand of course that ultimately these are matters for the proper U.S.
judicial authorities and, if so advised, the United States Congress under the 25th
Amend1nent to the Constitution of the United States, which of course has power to
impeach any President who has 1nisled state electoral authorities, Congress itself
and the American electorate as to his or her eligibility for office. It would also be a
matter entirely for the House of Representatives or the Senate as to whether they
appointed special counsel to inquire into the issue of whether or not President
Obama fulfills the eligibility requirements for the office of President and require a
DNA test if so advised.
11. As the issue may have political ramifications it is right that I should disclose my
membership of the Conservative and Unionist Party in Great Britain, although I
am not presently an office-holder within the Party. I was formerly a member of
Page 6 of 15
APX 145
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
the Labour Party and stood for Parliament in the Labour interest, for the Division
of Horsha1n in the County of West Sussex, in 1987 and the European Parliament
for the European Division of West Sussex in 1989. I defected to the Tory Party,
largely but not solely on the issue of UK me1nbership of the European Union,
shortly after the 1997 General Election in Britain.
12. For the avoidance of doubt it is possible in England to be both an active member of
a political party and a judicial officer at the same time, indeed at one time it was
quite common for Members of Parliament to sit as Recorders (part-time judges) in
the Crown Court. I well recall a particularly pleasant jury trial before the late Sir
Peter Archer QC MP at the then Crown Court at the Middlesex Guildhall, e.g., in
the late 1990s, after I had left his party for the Tories. He was if I n1ay say so a
deeply honorable man and would not have dreamt of allowing such political
differences as we might have had to influence his conduct of the trial. Similarly,
when I sat as an immigration judge, I did not allow such opinions as I had on the
issue of British membership of the European Union to affect the exercise of my
judicial discretion when I was asked to refer questions of community law to the
Court of Justice of the European Con1munities under Article 177 of the Treaty of
Rome, indeed I became the first i1nn1igration judge to refer questions of law to the
ECJ in Luxembourg, and went across to Europe to observe the proceedings.
13. I cannot conceive that the requirements on an expert witness in New York State
are any less onerous than they are in England. I have not given evidence in an
American court before, nor prepared an expert's report for use in an American
court, although I count a nu1nber of A1nerican lawyers as friends and a friend who
is a Superior Court judge in Los Angeles was kind enough to invite me to watch
proceedings in his court. I have also been privileged to have met with a small
nu1nber of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States over the years,
including that nice man with respect the late Chief Justice Rehnquist. Whilst I
an1 not an officer of the New York State Supreme Court, as a matter of comity and
Page 7 of 15
APX 146
USCA Case
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 150 of 437
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 19 of 109
out of respect for the court, I would not regard my duties to an An1erican court to
be any less onerous than my duties to a court in my own country.
14. I respectfully adopt the observation of Ton1lin J. in Graigola Merthyr v. Swansea
Corporaton [1928] 1 Ch. 31 that an expert witness has a "special duty to the
court". I also respectfully adopt the statement by Hodgkinson in Expert Evidence:
Law and Practice (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1st ed., 1990), at page 90, that "the
expert witness has a principal and overriding duty, not to the party by whom he is
retained, but to the court".
15. For the avoidance of doubt, bearing in mind my own political beliefs and President
Obama's ethnicity, I accept the cardinal importance of avoiding any political or
racial bias in coming to my conclusions as an intelligence expert. As it happens, I
came to the same conclusion as regarding his eligibility for the office of President
of the United States in respect of President Obama's white Republican opponent,
Senator McCain, as I did in relation to then Senator Obama.
In relation to
Senator McCain that was by reason of his birth in the Republic of Panama. So far
as I know my conclusions as regards Senator McCain are in the public domain.
16. I deal firstly with my role in tendering informal advice to the CIA and the DIA. As
the court will understand, with respect, intelligence agencies work on a quite
different principle to courts and lawyers.
Page 8 of 15
APX 147
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
lOth 2007.
social occasion. I would not be offended were either the CIA or the DIA to deny
that the lunch had ever happened, or that I had tendered advice on the
desirability of a DNA test and how best to conduct it, indeed that would be
standard operating procedure. In fact however, although the advice I gave has
been in the public domain since 2008, there has been no denial from either the
CIA or DIA.
17. I do not name the names of Allied intelligence officers with whom I have had
dealings.
intelligence expert if intelligence officers felt they could not repose trust in 1ne not
to blow their identities. It is also discourteous and thoroughly bad practice and
can expose the officers with whom you are dealing to unnecessary risk. In relation
to American intelligence officers it might also involve a breach of the Intelligence
Identities Protection Act (IIPA). I am familiar with IIPA as the act was abused in
a with respect misconceived prosecution, United States v. Libby, during the BushCheney Presidency in relation to a CIA analyst, Valerie Plame, who was not in
fact protected by liPA.
Service (Ml6) and I was aware that the prosecution was without foundation I
passed a warning on to attornies for Karl Rove, whon1 I believed was the primary
target for the operation, and Lewis Libby, the ultimate defendant. Just because a
CIA or DIA officer does not happen to be operating undercover when you have
dealings with them it does not follow that they are not undercover at the present
ti1ne. I would be n1ost unwilling to name the officers and if I were to be asked that
question I would be grateful for the courtesy of notice, so that I might consult with
the offices of General Counsel to the CIA and General Counsel to the DIA. I am
known to a nun1ber of former General Counsel to US intelligence agencies,
including that very
nice
formerly
distinguished General Counsel to the DIA, and the excellent American Bar
Page 9 of 15
APX148
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 152 of 437
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 21 of 109
Association Cmnmittee on Law and National Security, who were kind enough in
2010 to invite me to one of their working breakfasts in Washington DC.
18. Some years prior to the lunch I had tendered infor1nal advice to the Security
Service (MI5) after concerns arose that a senior n1ember of the Labour
Government, B, 1night be a blackmail risk, as a result of claiming a child, L, to be
his.
politically sensitive, the informal advice was given over lunch at a n1ilitary facility
to retired officers of the Service. I gave my analysis as to the true father and
suggested a means by which the intelligence might be verified, verification of
course being critical. A dinner was held to which myself, the mother, Mrs B, and
the suspected father, F, were invited. I believe that MI5 had an asset inside the
caterers, a Sikh. The operational concept was that this asset would secrete the
wine glasses used by Mrs Band F for DNA comparison with DNA retrieved from L
(the baby's) saliva. I had a fair understanding of DNA testing by this time and
readily appreciated that you did not need to draw blood, which might be
distressing for baby and might amount to a criminal assault upon a minor,
something I advised MI5 against. So far as I an1 aware the test excluded B as a
candidate for the father of L. At any rate MI5's budget went up shortly thereafter,
two brief later encounters with the then Director-General of MI5 were surprisingly
amicable and I heard no more about it, except that F sought to cause me
professional difficulties and B did not place me on his Christmas card list.
19. I explained all this to the intelligence officers at the Claridges lunch.
My
recollection is that the DIA officer was surprised and that the CIA officer just
smiled. The technique, which was non-invasive, lawful and quite simple, provided
not just sufficient DNA for a reliable test, but a chain of evidence, as the glasses
also had the user's fingerprints. Senator Obama's 9urported mother, Stanley Ann
Dunhan1, sadly had died, aged 53, on November
7th
1995.
Maternity was of
greater interest then than paternity, as the claimed father, Barack Hussein
Page 10 of 15
APX 149
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Obama Senior had no claim to citizenship of the United States, that is to say then
Senator Obama's claim to be a US citizen rested on his claimed relationship with
Stanley Ann Dunhmn.
DNA of Stanley Ann Dunham's n10ther, Madelyn Lee Dunham, along with that of
Senator Obama. That could most easily be done, in my opinion, by using the glass
technique successfully trialed by MI5. I also advised checking for photographs of
Stanley Ann Dunham, whom I believe was known to the CIA in any event from
her days in US AID, in particular from the summer of 1961, when she was
supposed to have been pregnant, and her medical records, and Madelyn Dunham's
FBI file, which I believed dated from 1944, and Boeing security file, if extant, in
connection with Abwehr sabotage activities on the B-29 Superfortress line at
Boeing's Wichita, Kansas plant.
20. To the best of my knowledge and belief the DNA test was done and Senator
Obama's claim to be the son of Stanley Ann Dunham could not be supported. I
cannot say to the court that either CIA or DIA came back to me and said so in
terms. I would not expect then1 to and it would be contrary to good intelligence
practice. I would however expect to be told if my advice had led to either agency
wasting time or resources, not to mention the cost of a good lunch.
21. The outcon1e of the DNA test, as I understood it to be, was consistent with what I
knew of then Senator Obama's background. It was 1ny understanding then, and
still is, that he was born in Mon1basa in what was then the Kenyan Protectorate,
on or about August 4th 1960.
MI5 and MI6. The President's claimed father was known to British intelligence in
1960 due to his connection with the Mau Mau terrorist organization. There is no
evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham went to Kenya in 1960, that is to say she
cannot have been the mother, assuming the intelligence about the birth in
Nion1basa to be correct.
22. I should explain to the court that in 1960 the Kenyan Protectorate was not part of
Page 1 1 of 15
APX 150
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 154 of 437
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 23 of 109
the British Empire proper. It was not a British imperial possession, but formed
part of the territory of His Highness the Sultan of Zanzibar, who very sensibly had
placed his territory under British protection.
I am not a computer
specialist but I was not surprised when the document was questioned by forensic
computer experts.
register of live births. Of course any intelligence analysis must be reviewed in the
light of new developments, but the electronic facsimile copy of the birth certificate,
in my albeit humble expert opinion, was not a material development.
24. I am aware that the senior official of the Hawai'i Department of Health, Ms.
Loretta Fuddy, who authenticated the facsimile birth certificate, purportedly died
in the crash of a Makani Kai Air Cessna Grand Caravan at or about 3.45 pm on
Decmnber 11th 2013, on a short flight from Molokai to Oahu, allegedly following
engine failure. I cannot express a concluded view, as I have not made a detailed
study of the incident, but there are a nun1ber of anmnalies that I should draw to
the court's attention. The engine is said to have failed, but the Grand Caravan is
powered by a Pratt and Whitney Canada PT6A turboprop, a highly reliable and
well-proven motor, nor is it clear why the engine failed. Modern engines do not
fail without a reason. No PT6A-engined airplanes were grounded as a result of
Page 12 of 15
APX 151
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
25. I should explain that it is essential when ditching an airplane to keep the nose up.
In a successful ditching the first part of the aircraft to make contact with the
water should be the ventral or lower rear fuselage. I have had some limited flight
experience, having flown first solo with the University of Wales Air Squadron
(RAFVR) in 1979 and hold myself out as an aviation sabotage expert. I was of
course trained in ditching procedure. A number of aviation incidents are covered
in Spyhunter. It is exceedingly rare for an airplane to ditch without causing some
airframe damage.
Page 13 of 15
APX 152
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 156 of 437
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 25 of 109
and the signatures of both myself and the notary public appear on the same page.
Page 14 of 15
APX 153
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
The foregoing is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated
to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters as an expert I believe to be
true. The grounds of my belief as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are
as follows: 3rd parties, books and records, and personal knowledge.
That I am willing and able to appear under oath to provide testimony as to the truth
of the statements affirmed to before the Court and for examination by Parties; and
That I appear without reservation of my own free will, and without expectation of
payment for such testimony.
Page 15 of 15
APX 154
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 158 of 437
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 27 of 109
His prediction to me in 2002 that the Euro would collapse the precise way that it did was so
incredible at that time, I thought he had 'lost it.'
The paedophile life of Chairman Mao and his use of under-age boys for sex to blackmail
political opponents is covered as are the honey traps his successors use to target prominent
individuals who shape political and financial opinions in Europe, America and Australasia.
His theories about Princess Diana's murder and the gay life of Edward Heath have yet to be
proved. 9/11 was a milestone for many-including Michael. Again, his theory has yet to be
proven.
The book covers spy rings through the centuries, blackmail, false flags, international leaders'
sexual proclivities and appetites-which made them vulnerable and compromised security
and the lives of troops and assets. KGB sex training schools for spies, gay and straight, to
1
APX 155
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
make them lovers par excellence. Sleepers and deep cover agents with m1ss1ons in
hibernation spanning decades, waiting to be activated, it's all there. Nothing can be
concealed from the Spyhunter.
An intelligence specialist with deep sources in the Pentagon, the CIA and elsewhere,
Michael was also consultant for the TV series 'Spooks'.
Most
of
his
contacts
worldwide
are
vetted
through Washington and
Langley, at least that
element of Langley who
are, as Michael would say,
'the Good Guys and Gals'.
His life has been in danger
many times and checking
under his Bentley each
morning for bombs is a
regular occupation. A must
for
every
bookstore,
university
and
school
library-where sixth formers
and
university
undergraduates are guaranteed
to be kept more awake
during history lessons by
Michael's
titillating
revelations than any porn
page on the internet-or
dusty
geriatric
history
lecturer, whichever is the
greater. It's what history has
been
waiting
for-an
alternative wake-up book to
challenge the status quoand start a fierce debate.
Whether you agree or disagree, whether what Shrimpton says is so incredulous you are
stupefied in disbelief, anger, rage, or just on the floor with uncontrollable laughter, the 700page Spyhunter is a fascinating alternative look at the history of espionage from the 11th
century to the present day.
Spyhunter: The Secret History of German Intelligence, by Michael Shrimpton;
Publishers: June Press
www.JunePress.com 2014
2
APX 156
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 160 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 29 of 109
Case No.:
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
APX 157
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
PRESENT:
-'\
~(
Hon.
II
,1
tf:.N/ r>t~'--
'
Justice
Cal. No.
Plaintiff(s)
Index No.
against-
Defendant(s)
The following papers numbered I to
Papers Numbered
nwW~
~~~------------~-~~~~--~~~~~~----
Filed Papers- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - + - - - - -
I) I
Fd\.e,
.u
/
1:_,-1//
(!,r~,t-~/I
0'/'t----{ 'N ~~
lfl .
11
I2_,-!--
-"[..
L_. ;'
/\.
"'\
1/'L/)
/I
. _)
/1 ~ L
-t.:lfl...Al.../\_
pe /' J--.
;,Le
'/\A.~;_'
/"?--f!Sl
lc
(_[
G--1--11
t; .. Q_ ..!::_a.-;-;
MG_
MD_
Motion Seq. #
E N T E R
V\. _. .
J.S.C.
EJV-n:v 11-04
APX 158
~------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
USCA Case
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 162 of 437
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 31 of 109
Case No.:
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
Exhibit 6
APX 159
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
0 2 JUN 2014
Date: _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Ref:
Dear Visa Applicant:
Thank you for your interest in traveling to the United States. Unfortunately, we are unable to
issue a visa to you today because you were found unqualified under Section 214(b) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act. Under Section 214(bL applicants are presumed to be
intending immigrants unless they credibly demonstrate, to the consular officer's satisfaction,
that their economic, family, and social ties outside the United States are strong enough that
they will depart at the end of their authorized stay and that their intended activities in the
United States will be consistent with the visa status.
Because you either did not show strong ties outside the United States today or did not
activities in the United States would be consistent with the
visa status, you have not met the legal standard to qualify.
Issuance of a nonimmigrant visar is not p"rimarily a document-based decision. The visa
application and a brief interview are often all that are required for the officer to determine
whether an applicant qualifies.
Today's decision is final and cannot be appealed. While you are not prohibited from reapplying
for a visa, unless you can show credible, new, and compelling ties outside the United States,
and that y~ur intended activities in the United States are consistent with the visa class, a
different outcome is unlikely.
If after reading this and the FAQs on the back of this form you decide to reapply,_you must
schedule a new interview and pay a new visa application fee.
Sincerely,
consular Officer
Nonimmigrant Visa Section
Embassy ofthe United States
NIV 2.14b
April 2.012
APX 160
http://london.usembassy.gov
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 33 of Page
109 164 of 437
Case No.:
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE by
JOHN F. KERRY at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:l-800-877-8339
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Exhibit 7
APX 161
Document #1550250
case 1:14-cv-oo995-R~
Filed: 04/30/2015
---------------------------------------------------------X
Versus
-c
n~ ,
Dr
rrl .~.,
"' -
~- -~rn
:. ~-~
-i:<
.
.
.A.J
zc::_
-n
c_
:Z:r-
o --
ol~
Respondents.
t .
~:
3:(1)
n-t-
(.t.)
Upon the annexed affidavit of Christopher Earl Strunk agent, dated -f~
m
(')
m
_
<
m
2~014,
., ~-~-;~~:~
APX 162
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 166 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 35 of 109
process of law under the full force of the Federal and State constitutions accordingly.
5. Trial on the facts be joined with the June 18, 2014 trial for a bench trial;
6. Granting such other and further relief as to the court may seem just and equitable.
order that Petitioner, JUROR INDEX 247060746, serve on a jury that must start on June 3,
2014 is stayed; and it is further,
ORDERED that service of a copy of this order to show cause and the papers upon
which it was made upon the Honorable DAVID I. SCHMIDT J.S.C., I.A.S. Part 47, the
Honorable ARTHUR M. SCHACK J.S.C., I.A.S. Part 23 , and the Honorable GAIL
PRUDENT! J.S.C and JOSHUA PEPPER Assistant Attorney General of the New York
State by_ personal delivery pursuant to CPLR 2103(b)(1) _office delivery pursuant to
, 2014
Associate Justice
Appellate Division 2nd Department
APX 163
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEWYORK
APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
----~-------------------------------x
Versus
--------------------------------------------------x
PETITIONER AFFIDAVIT In Support Of OSC with TRO and Stay affirmed June 2, 2014
EXIllBIT A: NOTICE OF MOTION with CPLR 310l(d} and Judicial Notice of Status W
Plaintiffs AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
EXIllBIT 1: Affidavit of expert MICHAEL SHRIMPTON under CPLR 3101(d)
: o e of Issue for the Pebbon 21948-20f2EXInBIT 3: Appellant's Brief for Appeal 2013-06335
EXIllBIT 4: Redacted Express Deed In Trust To The United States OfAmerica
EXlllBIT B: 30 May 2014 SLIP ORDER by Hon. David I Schmidt in 29642-08
EXIDBIT C : Plaintiffs Subpoenas for Case Strunk v Paterson Index 29642-08
EXIllBIT D: Strunk Affidavit Letters to Congressmen 1 May 2014 re 29642-08
EXIITBIT E: 24 January 2014 SLIP ORDER by Han. David I Schmidt in 29642-08
E XIllBIT F: 11 April2012 Decision and Order by Ron. Arthur M. Schack in 6500-2011
EXIDBIT G: 4 March 2014 M 170416 Decision and Order on Motion by Appellate Panel
EXIDBIT H: 27 January 2014 Response by NYSUCS 2nd JD to 16 Jan 2014 COMPLAINT
EXIITBIT I: 30 May 2014 NYS HESC Response to Strunk FOIL re 29642-08
EXlflBIT J : SUMMONS to JURY Dut~ sta/Y 3 June 2:;for
crpnk
Dated:
-~ ~!\...__.
/?CIJ\Lf?
-____..f~
ChrlStopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris
~Y/ \(DJJt}(_
secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust
transmitting utility TMCHRISTOPHER EARL
STRUNK Plaintiff, the Executor and Settlor
for the Express Deed In Trust To The United
States OfAmerica, located at
593 Vanderbilt Avenue - PMB 281
Brooklyn, New York Zipcode excepted 11238
Cell: 845-901-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws
APX 164
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 168 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 37 of 109
~y
C:ase
~o.:
11238
v.
U.S. DEPARTME~T OF STATE by
JOHN F. KERRY at 2201 C Street ~W
Washington, DC 20520 TTY: 1-800-877-8339
C:E~TRAL I~TELLIGE~CE AGE~CY
by JOH~ 0. BRENNA~
Washington, D.C:. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. ~W Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFIC:E
101 Independence Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS by its agents at
40 NORTH PEARL STREET, SUITE 5
ALBA~Y, ~y 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
APX 165
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Filed
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON
(150 characters)
c.
chris@strunk.ws
(150 characters)
The information you provide is used solely by the Visa Branch of the U.S. Embassy London. In
order to process certain types of requests, we may have to ask for your full name as it
appears in your passport and contact information. You may decline to provide such
information, but that could inhibit our ability to answer your questions or assist you with your
request. Any information provided on our web form is not retained and is used only in order to
process your current request or answer your current questions. The Visa Branch works in
accordance with Consular Affairs procedures as well as the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and the Privacy Act of 1974.
Emails and Privacy
Email is not secure and any information you provide on this online inquiry form cannot be
guaranteed safe from potential loss. If you choose to send us any Personally Identifiable
Information in your email enquiry, it will be removed from the email before we send our
reply.
Submit
APX 166
I of2
6/6/2014 I :52 PM
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 170 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 39 of 109
Case No.:
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE by
JOHN F. KERRY at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:l-800-877-8339
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
9
APX 167
Case
#14-5327
Document
--USCA
.. ---- Case
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
ENIGMA BOOKS
ROBERT L
MILLER
::6
12 E"'ST 86TH STREET 309
NEW YORK
2 I 2
NY I 0028
68 - 172 - 47
989 13 I 0
646246!:1010
RC:PR
RIBBON:
:,
.
~
!111~1m11mn11t m
DH:CWR
llP<>t:1ailst
r"n;S~ on
-\pti! 1!>th
~O l 4 ~!<!I
hll!O
a~
!:;> t.YW,
(f: .,)
..
"
\o
.,..,.
:_LUMINATI
. i."
Indianapolis, IN 46219
E-mail: tdoherty@cardlnalpub.com
www.cardinalpub.com
.....
212-750-8891
CONFESSIONS
LYc:JN ZAGA~I
_ fC..I
-----
Henry Hewes
212810-9433
President
Frank Pohole
!!
~:A.'ou
tJn
TRILOGY
by
Ao:r.
.~:, '.\'~: ~, '"1 .:~no ~ttl ~'>:.a:~ I~ (iJ'lflt!>.~-<11 ta l .mo O.nt;vm t:: ::.~
~i-. , ::J u~ ~-. l~:t hiun~rr:..::.; 1~~ Pt.OI.t~>hoo 5 !J.eoi'ii. f''! 1m;:,11 to'llh tt.~ :::1
l .1'!1 tit.:t; ..!!! Ennr:; Pe: .J(;t:!\letfl ar>d ul'1!l" 100.; ~rtl!i thu .tuth01
-:,1 I) ~u : l llHl- ~'"..,1 I<! .l<fpttni:"-'..;.o on 11-..eso ~u\tllc:ts lhQt tOt(! ~~ ~:)
Amorican
------
APX 168
~"'tinCtMo.ll
K.:aCY.;r.J
Na ur~fu
,.,
21281!!-9433 chns@slrunk ws
USCA
Case
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 172 of 437
Case
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 41 of 109
PUBLICATIONS
AMBER SERMENO
6611 Waldo Avenue, El Cerrito, CA 94530
51 0.680.6..400 sgentry@littleporrotpubs.com
~~
USNI
~
U.S. NAVAL INSTITl.Tt:
NAUSICAA RENNER
~ SSOCJATE
i1..EB EDITOR
NAUSICAA@BOSTONREVJEW NET
~'II \V(tHI
Ruad
:\unap~t!i,....
t\Jf):! IHl:!
\Ill 11,11
'fpt
' \ I \ I II._ I I \
JOHN ROBLEDO
It
1\o ll
,, .
'
lll
I I I I'\ U I '
I:;;
'-.IIIIo ~ l,.L ~r 1 ,
(. h,llllf'dl.>-;11
PrOOO<;!Ion Oueclor
Adwem~ng 1.\anagm
fiJ111
.: ,- ;H I''",
111
I \\
I' It I ~'
<"(
Jllll'l"'' ulllrn>~, 1
,t 11
udl!llo
I 1
o-l>l;
o.fu
CHI POll f
'-
-.
;,
t
-
...-..,.
.. I
"'"
%
~
'I<-
....
0 2
-0
en
Kevin Moran
-:::
-,
r:r.
-:
~
-:
==
r.
;-
:.
""'
.r
.. .
, ...............
~!~'.,,<~,.d
-,. :.
/
RRENDA M. SMOTHERMAN
A-.., I,,_' JloiH rl, ,, , loljl:l
.,.If .. "
AbiogdonPress corn
APX 169
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Case No.:
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE by
JOHN F. KERRY at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY: 1-800-877-8339
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Exhibit 10
APX 170
USCA
Case #14-5327
Document
#1550250
'.lew York State
Board cBsei<lis1I4n0~J)G~5-Rillge
Document
1-1
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page gov/RunningOffice.html
174 of 437
Filed 06/10/14
R~g&49. {)ic1iG9.ny.
Running for Of fi ce
Requirements to Hold Office
Fr4
joFFICE
jCITIZENSHIPjAGE !RESIDENCY
!STATUTE
President of the
United States
Bom a citizen
United States
Constitution Art. II
1
United States
Senator
IF
NYS Governor/
Lt. Governor
Attorney General
Comptroller
Representative
in Congress
years in country
years
Citizen 9
years
~
s
United States
Constitution Art. I
3
Citizen 7
years
United States
Constitution Art. I
2
'
Citizen
18
Resident of state for 5 years and
years resident of district for 12 months
immediately preceding election. (In a
redistricting year, may be a resident of
county for 12 months immediately
preceding the election .)
Public Officers
Law 3
(rliit
(-t 11KB)
(-t. 23KB)
(~
23KB)
I of 13
APX 171
6/8/2014 4:50PM
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Case No.:
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE by
JOHN F. KERRY at 2201 C StreetNW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
101 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS by its agents at
40 NORTH PEARL STREET. SUITE 5
ALBANY, NY 12207-2729 FAX (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
APX 172
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 176 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 45 of 109
USCA Case #13-5160
Document #1493255
Filed: 05/14/2014
Page 1 of 189
, .. .
E. Barrett Prettyman
U.S. Courthouse and
William B. Bryant Annex
33 Constitut\on Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001
.~
f
l
.\p r.al:
--
--
(Exhibit D)
~V~~-~~ ~~-~~~.~s active related cases with Van Allen as pending intervener
11. KJngs tOUIW-2/2008 tActlve STIWNK.CHRJSTOPKeR CHRISTOPHER
EARL
EARL STRUNK Pro9e
06/13/2014 .0AYID
:SCHMIDT
t(PT. 47)
PATERSON,DAVID
A.
Nl
D
+
13 Kings
CHRISTOPEREARL STRUNK -
BOARD OF
B.ECTIONS
Prose
--
HAICEEM
.JEFFRIES
-Prose
06/18/2014 NON-JURY
TRIAL
~DJNESS
PART
------
------------
_I
APX 173
-~- ---~------------
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Document. #1493255
F!lecJ' 05i14i2014
Pc1.ge 2 of 189
Party
Docket
Entry
;ongin
10/31/2011
Orly
Taitz
05/03/2013
13:54:27
0090-1 : 1:11-cv-00402-RCL
United States District Court for the
District of Columbia
11/02/2011
Orly
Taitz
07/24/2012
14:04:35
0090-1 : 1:11-cv-014.fl-R(J,_
United States District Court for the
District of Columbia
11/17/2011
Orly
Taitz
01/23/2012
15:29:25
0090-1 : 1:11-cv-01421-RCL
United States District Court for the
District of Columbia
11-5304
Orly Taitz v. Michael
:\strue
1.1-530
Orly Taitz v. Kathy
Ruemmler
11-5329
In re: Orly Taitz. et dl
Last
Opening
Date
10-5092
Christo her Strunk v.
Deoartment of State, et al
Christopher Eart
03/31 /2010~-trunk-
01/14/2011
12-5289
USA v. Barack Obama. et
Christopher Eart
09/13/2012 Strunk
Christopher Earl
12/28/2012 Strunk
ill
12-5414
Christopher Strunk v.
Department of State, et al
13-500~
Case Number
Title
_ _
17 41 13
Opening
Date
Party
Last
Docket
Origin
Entry
13-5059
In re . Harold Van Allen
02/19/2013
Harold W.
Van Allen
_13-5160
Harold Van A!l.en v.
Deoartment of Veterans
Affairs. et al
05/31/2013
Harold W.
Van Allen
APX 174
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 178 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 47 of 109
USCA Case #13-5160
Document #1493255
Filed: 05/14/2014
Page 3 of 189
/k.+ t I
at:> l'f
APX 175
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
No. 13-5160
v.
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
and United States Department of the Navy,
Board for Correction of Naval Records
(BCNR),
ORDER
BY:
APX 176
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
/s/
Amy Yacisin
Deputy Clerk
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 180 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 49 of 10~age of
1
SUPREME COURT
OF
No. 13A1183
Title:
THE
t':.JITED
STATES
v.
Docketed:
Lower Ct:
Case Nos. :
---Date--- -------Proceedings and Orders--------------------May 27 2014 Application (13A 1183) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 11, 2014
to September 14, 2014, submitted to The Chief Justice.
May 29 2014 Application (13A 1183) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 14,
2014.
-----Address------------
--Phone---
(202) 514-2217
Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Party name: Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
APX 177
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13a1183.htm
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -
------
6/9/2014
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
SUPREME COURT
0 F
No. 13A980
Title:
T H E
1' ?\1 1 T E D
S T A T E S
Docketed:
Lower Ct:
Case Nos.:
---Date--- -------Proceedings and Orders--------------------Mar 20 2014 Application (13A980) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April14, 2014 to
May 14, 2014, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Mar 28 2014 Application (13A980) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until May 14, 2014.
May 13 2014 Application (13A980) to extend further the time from May 14, 2014 to June 13,2014, submitted to
Justice Ginsburg.
May 30 2014 Application (13A980) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
-
- -Name-------------
-------Address------------------
--------Phone---
APX 178
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13a980.htm
----------
6/9/2014
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 182 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL Document 1-1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 51 of 10page of
1
SUPREME COURT
OF
No. 13A979
Title:
THE
r~JTED
STATES
v.
Docketed:
Lower Ct:
Case Nos.:
---Date--- -------Proceedings and Orders------------------Mar 20 2014 Application (13A979) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April14, 2014 to
May 14, 2014, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Mar 28 2014 Application (13A979) granted by Justice Ginsburg extending the time to file until May 14, 2014.
May 13 2014 Application (13A979) to extend further the time from May 14, 2014 to June 13, 2014, submitted to
Justice Ginsburg.
May 30 2014 Application (13A979) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
-------Address------------------
--Phone---
APX 179
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/13a979.htm
6/9/2014
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Case No.:
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Exhibit 12
APX 180
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 184 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 53 of 109
D.C.
20520
JUL 2 9 20IJ
In reply refer to:
CA/PPT/L/LE- Case Control Number: 200807238
Christopher E. Strunk
593 Vanderbilt Avenue, #281
Brooklyn, NY 11238
Dear Mr. Strunk:
The following is in response to your request to the Department of
State, dated November 22, 2008, requesting the release of material under the
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).
We have completed a search for records responsive to your request.
The search resulted in the retrieval of six documents that are responsive to
your request. After careful review of these documents, we have determined
that al1 six documents may be released in full.
We did not locate a 1965 passport application referenced in an
application for amendment of passport that is included in the released
documents. Many passport applications and other non-vital records from
that period were destroyed during the 1980s in accordance with guidance
from the General Services Administration.
Passport records typically consist of applications for United States
passports and supporting evidence of United States citizenship. Passport
records do not include evidence of travel such as entrance/exit stamps, visas,
residence permits, etc., since this information is entered into the passport
book after issuance.
APX 181
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Enclosures:
As stated
APX 182
USCA Case
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 186 of 437
Case #14-5327
1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 55 of 109
?1
FORM APPROVED
BUDC.&:T BURS: AU NO.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
PosT ___
D~j_a_ka
__rt
__a~,__I_n_d_o_n_e_s_ia
_______
APPLICATION FOR
RENEWAL
.45SPORT
EGISTRATION
Doeumont No.
AMEHDMENT
AMENDED AS REQUESTED
~RENEWED IE'~)
EXTENS10N
OF
CARD OF IDENTITY
CERTIFICATE OF _!fENTITY
F 7777 "$3
47R\ \7.&
It I rt,;
5.00
TO
Jul.lS,l970
FEE COLLECTED
NO FOEE COLLECTED
TH,_u_r.1,1-ft0
---
~\ATf!S PERMANENTLY TO
ffl'ilJl.l._.t._e__ MONTHS
PORT OF DEPARTURE
NAM~
OF SHIP OR AIRLINE
IN PEF!JVA-Te - #AI?RIED
I# {)0 IV E.S /"'tV Clt7 ZEN ...O_A_T_E_O_F_O_E_P_AR_T_U_R_E_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- f
77J
AN
I ba..-e not (BIId no other peraun ancluded or to \,eo included in dte passpon or t.locumentarion has), since acquirins lloired States c:lti
z:cnahip, been nan~talized as a c:idzeo of a forei~n snare; taken an oath oc made an a(fumatioo or ocher formal decluatioa of allegiance
to a foreiaa state; entered or served ia the armed forc:es of a foreign state; aec:epted or perfOrmed the duties of any oHiee. posr, or employment uoder the goverorueot of a foreign state or political subdivision thereof; vored in a polidc:al elec:tioa in a foreisn 9tate or pal"
tidpated in a.o. eleetion or plebiscite to determine the sovereignty over foreign territory; made a formal renuac:iatioo of nadoaality either
in the United States or before a. diplomatic or c:onsul1u officer of the United States in a foreisn Stare; ever sought or claimed the benefits of the nerionaliey of any Coreign state; or been co evicted by a court or coutt martia.l of competent jurisdiction of comminia1 any act
of treaSDn againslt, or anemptins by force to overthrow, 0[ bearin8 arms asainst, the United States. or c:oaRpirios to overthrow, put down
or to deauoy by force. the Governmeat of [be Uaired Starn,
(If artY of th- abave-mc:nllond ocfs or c:onrlltlona hqye bun perform~cl by or vpply 10 tho applicant, or to cmy othr person inr:lrx/ed
In the popwf or Jor:umentotlon. tfee portion wnlcft applla shou/c/ 0. struck out, om:l o supplem.ntory eMpionotory .-rat~nf under oa#ft .
(or afflrmarlon} by 1fte per.on to ~om rfle ponfan Is opp/tco6fe hould be Gttached end madtt a Drrf of thf appllcotion.}
...
(SEAL)
Vice
Consul - - - - - - - (The Deparaucnt will asswue that tbe conular officer, rwud'
to tbe applicant' identitY uoleu a notation to the :oatnuy i
FORM
7- 64
FS-299
APX 183
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
PAGE Z
SIRTMPL.ACE
MA~FIIF.Cl
'T O
- --
C"J
11}
BIFITHOATE:
-PASSPORT
DISPOSITION
(?c:1
CJ
OF MY
ATTACHED
DIVORCE
LJ
DEATH
CJ
CANCEL.e::o
(OATEI
NAMES
eiRTHPI..ACE
~~~~
... ~A.rvrA'
(~~~~
BIRTHOATE
--
----
--
- --
OA.TE M'-RRIEO
PI..ACE MARRIEO
MARRIED TO
CITIZENSHIP OF HUSIIIANO
u.s. CITIZEN
VI
111:.n
AL.IEN CITIZ.EN OF
I \<'I
\U "-"''-" \1 R"'-
,,
'"'""
,.........
IUI't ""'"'U<=-.:>
'"'""I
I
I
j
THE
PASSPORT
C:ERTII"IC: ... TE
D
D
0
WAS
AENEWI!:O TO
Ill
E:
~
!~
FORM
7- 64
Acttleb
EXTENDED TO
I
:
(j)
>!
~
:.,
:c
[ll
:c
j
)(
FS299
O"TE
fo Dept.)
A.UTHORITY
J(
referrfl/
APX 184
APX 185
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
DEPARTMC::NT OF 5TAT::::
-~----------------------------------~R~E~Q~u~E~S~T~--------------------------------~
I 1"
l ~~ : bee_n 1nform:-d rha~ my pa;;.sport 1S nor va1id and th . H a v::~lid passport is required by law to encer the
_r~:r~ "ir.H.::'. 1. :e,-11es: rhar an e.<:-eprJon,be granted co me, as provided in Section 53.1(h), Title :!2 of the Code
1~Jer:1~ !\c~~!:Jcn)qoc; I 1. ! il dc:::;r::tr.d ~h:J.r a ft:e o! $25 JS required under Sectlan 53.2(h\ and I will remjr such fee
1, ..
/J'- r,
yf
_ __
It 1 .:.
REPORT- Pursuant to Section 215 of the !:nmigrctio"n and Nationality Act of 1952
r,;:ME
5 1 611
DESCRI PTlON
3TA~iLE.Y
ANN ;3QETDRO
14~
HOME ADDRESS
Blx
"',.~
THO~
Brm. . -:1
Bro'..rr.
lb
'
TE
..
96 ~~ ,c;
,.I
NATURALIZATION DATE
N. A.
F 777788
Ui'-19-6'i
Honolu..!.1::., Ha,...m.i.i
--
A'ichita, Kansas
L ___
to-
Jctober
Djakarta, Indonesia
NAME OF CARRIER
DESTINATION
f-.
--
Jar:-c:.n Airlines
...'
Passport as
r-
DESTINATiON
October 21
above ~
sho~
FAA 812
~TE
NAME OF CARRIER
Honolulu, Ha,..raii
ACTION TAKEN
DC/1
.L l~(l J
{lnspa:::tcr's Stamp)
HONOLlJLU, H.AT:!AII
8, ,~~Mr-
....
__..
.II/...,
_.......
-~ -1 ~- ::'--:;
111
--
'
..
'
- '
APX 186
,_
USCA Case
Case1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 190 of 437
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 59 of 109
1VEO
F:lt
DEPARTMEN
OF STATE
Amend
shown in section;
031
oa oc oo
~--------~----------------------------------------------------~
0
INSTRUCTIONS: All raquosts for inclusion of jlorsons rnusr be sworn to (or affirmed) beForo on Agent ol th~ Deportmant of State or Clerk o: Court. Photographs, which moef rha
requ.iremctnts below, and evidcnco of citi.teruhip must be &ubmittecf f~:~r all persons to be
il"'c:ludctd by thl:. amendment. If such per~onz; hove hod, or boon included In, a pra.,ious
pa:uport. il should ba submiucd lntoo;.l of orher documents, and Section G completed.
P3
(W11"E '!It
F IL EO
!ll'l
M~.o.AR"GE.
CA
cE.RT
CITY
INAT<.'N '
tFI
tHU56AND':II
FILC:C
SFI
ce:RT
I ri
CFI
!::a
CITV
OTHR
!.
QS&R
v
0
"
...:...
I",J
IN
....
CARE OF
(First nQmt!)
(Lo.st nome)
(Middle nome}
-4
...._,_ ....../
i~
' s,<d<nkv
Ana
h,feb,.
Sceicr'O,ac:iti%en
requau rhor my passport, which is endosed, be amended os
o(
z ~ (
-i ::a
~-------------------------------------------------------------------+-------------------------------------------~~~
v
INCLUDE MY CHI LD(REN), AS FOLLOWS: (Also c:ompleH Section H if child(ren) acquired
]"
(Photo raquiremen1s Jor Inclusion)
l<
DATE OF BIRTH
l
w
..1
ll
r-------------------------------~----------------------------~--------------~
INCLUDE MY (WIFE) (HUSBAND}, 1\S FOLLOWS: {AI$o compltrte Section H if (wife)
!~
DATE OF
"'l
j
~
!!
0
0
D
0MV WI FE
D
0
MY HlJSBAHO
MY CHILDREN (GI.,.. "am.-(~)J
171
1- ,., I u
il
/11
()
~ - ":"o e..-.-:~ ,.
~ Y~A'.A-"'1 ~
WHO IS
-_/ c.
D..,
12f'~
CIT I %EN
0.-:
C1Tt7.~rt1
t\.-,):
{.' / /
r:.:;
(' .'
u.s.
PASSPORT
DATE ISSUED
NUMBER
~1-N_N
__
A_M_E__
0
FORM
7. 64
OSP-19
(OVER)
APX 187
.::
1\
"
.-;.
~..:;:
MA~RIAGE
~ ~
1-----+--~
OATE OF' BIRTH
NAME IN FULL
....
..
,-
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
PA CiE 2
TO BE COMPLETED BY AN APPLICANT REQUESTlNG INCLUSION IN THE PASSPORT OF A RELAT IV E WHO ACQUIR:D CITIZENSHIP
THROUGH NATURALIZATION
~----------------------------.---------~~~----~~~~~~~----~~-- ----------------------------------1
MY
THE
I MMIGRATED TO
u.
S. ON (Month,
aQy, year}
ON
0
Wl-<0 WAS NATURAL! ZED
a E. FORE
LOCATED I N ((lty,
?ARENT
FORMER ~USBANO
'5rarl
TO BE COMPLETED BY AN APPLICANT WHOSE WIFE WAS PREVIOUSL V MARRIED BEFORE MARCH 3, 1931, AND WHO IS TO BE INCLUDED
In
a stJpplementol
sratemen1)
---------------------4
QoE.o.n1
DATE
OIVORC:E
1 have nor (and no other person included or w be included in rhe passport bas), since acquiring United States citizenship,
been naturalized as a citizen of a foreign State; taken an oath ot made an affirm01tion or ocher formal declaration of allegiance to e.
foreign state; entered or served iu the armed forces of n foreign scnte; accepted or performed the dutses of IUl'l office:, pose, or em
ployment under che government of s foreign scace or polici.cal subdivision thereof; voted in a political elect.ior. ia a foreign SC.lte or
participated in 1111 elecdon or plebiscire co determine che s;overeisnty over foreign rerrhory; made a formlll renuoci;:u.ion of national
ity either in rbe United Srates or before a diplomaric or con!>ular olfJcer of the United Stares in a foreign state; ever sought or claim
ed rhe benefits of rhe nationality of any foreign state; or been convicted by a :ourt or court martial of competent jurisdiction of commitring any act of treason against, or ateempcing by force to overthrow, or benring arms against, the Un.ited States, or conspiring to
- - - - - - - ---11--- overthrow ut down or to descroy by locce, the Govemmenr of the Un.iced Stars
___
-
1--
(f{ any of the abaue-menliont'd aces or c-vnditions haue betJn performed by or apply to the appltca.nt. or Many other per3on includeri or t" be irJcluded 1n the passport, 'he portion which applie ~; ~hould be struck out, and a supplementary explanatory statement
under oath (or affirmation) by the perJon. tu w/l.om the portion is applicable .should be attached and made a part of this application,)
I solemnly swear (affirm) chat the starernencs herein made are true and chat I heve not previously asked to have chese addi
tiona} persoas included in my passporr; that they are not now in possession of valid passpons, o.nd that they have not made appli
cacion for passports and been refused.
L--------------------------------------------------~
DSP 19
FORM
7- 61l
APX 188
').
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Pc:;-;- LOCATtOI'I
DE?ARTMENT OF STATE
APPUCATION FOR
:JC PASSPORT
0 REGISTRATION
Z2433100
June
2!1976
D QHI
Ep ito~une 1,1981
Q"s JO
ANAJ ~ SO~'f:Qi.d.acillzen
oi th!! United Slates, do heretry apply Jor{a passport)
ilegt5!13tion)
DATE OF BIRTH
HEIGHT
').
.5_
Ft.
(S-~u~ WAJ
NOW
u
lti/E_IDE_N'
DAI..AM
No Faa passpgrt
pauport
tiSf'
Leorotlon al lssurng
Offr~:e
mb :
[J
Submirtd herowi!h
~ Canc:11llod end r&urned
Seat! end rturned
1.1\/).
STtJ#E.AJ1
RDML I
"'A~~
,,, '
Na.
OCCUPATION ~
NOW RESIDING
IC'ANSASJ
'COLOR OF P'E5
Ra.&w N
'"
ep ire
CARD OF ID EI'ITIT"t' AND REG.
,1.~A Data
.J1 , l 0 $3 f.. cal l=.! (lo c:ard)
0 ASpag passport
Fu col!,etod
::::J Ofilci al
Lj
Date
ST~NLf:..'/
REGISTaATION APPROVEcp
N,.
Jakarta, Indonesia
POST ACTION
PASSPORT IS!.UE:l
NOT ACCEPTABLE)
tl3
Oato cl lfauan<oe
~f11o.i 1
'I; t1~<
~'::t
Bearr:
TAitA.R_TA
QYes
HAVE VOU EVER BEEN REFUSED A f'ASSPORT OR RfG:STRAT,tN A5 A CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES?
IF ANSWER IS "YES'', EXPLI.IN WHEN AND WHY
t I P 'iffi" 'I
NATURALIZATION COURT
DATE NATURALIZED
COMPLETE ONLY IF OTHERS ARE TO BE INCLUDED INPASSPORT DR REGISTRATION AND S~MrT GROUP PHOTOGRAPH
0NATIVE BORN
~LACE
NATURALIZATION COL' RT
0HATURAUZED
NATURALIZED (Citv, $tote)
D"TE OF BIRTH
EVIDENCE OF PRIOR DOCUMENTATION OF ABOVEPIAMED PERSONS TO BE lNCLUDED (For completion by Consular Office)
CANCELED
NAMES
..
PASSPORT NO.
O.ATE OF ISSUe
OTHER
0~
DISPOSITION
DATE OF REGI!ITRA
TION OR
aJPTH REPORT
LOCATION OF
OFFICE
'
APX 189
FOr{~
APPftOV!:D
BUOG~T
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
FORM FS176
9-14
FA T HE~ ' S
Wle H ITA
A THE~
~ .:~u,.:ryl
~A.Ns-A S
u ECEAS EO
A THE~ RE SIOI,_.G AT
~~
,/i(~
QMOTHE
~DECEASED
H
ONTI-IS
t~
WARNING: False statements made knowingly and willrull~ in passport applications or in affidavits or other supportin~: uocumem:s sucmmea merewtm are pumsnaore uy
fine and /or impriSOilmettt under the provisions or 18 USC 1001 and/or lB USC 1542. AlteratiOn or mutilation of a passport issued pursuant to this application is punishable by fine a~d/Df' imprisonmen~ under the provisions of 18 USC l543. Tile use of a passport In violation of the restrictions contained lheiein or or the passport regula
tions Is punishable by fine and/or imprisonment under 18 lJSC 1544.
not (and no other person included in the arpllcation nas), since acquiring United States ciltZE11Ship, Deen naturalized as a citizen of a foreign slate; taken an oath or
affirmation oc other formal declaration o allegiance to a foreign state; entered or semd in lhe armed forces or a tore1gn state; accepted or pcrlormed the dull~ of
ce, post, or employment under the government of a lorei~n state o1 political subdivision lheren~ mada:. lonnal renunc1allon cf nationality either in lha United St~te~
a diplomatic or consular otricer of the United States in a foreign state; eve1 SOJJghl be cla1med the benef1ls of the naUc;nahty of any 'oreign state; or been
a court or court nartial of competent jurisdiction of committing any act or treason agatnsL or attempting by Ioree to overthrow, or bearrne arms agam.sl, lhe United Statss,
conspiring to overthrow, put dawn or to destroy by force, the Government or the United Slates.
aty o( tho cbovo-mcnr/anac/ Q~:f.t or =ndlfiortl
have ~Jc!en petfotrned by or Cf)llly fo tna applfc0111, or fo D'IY ather person lo be Included In the pos1p0rt ~registration, the
which apptlu altould Ia slrvr:lc CHJt, and o ~lementat)' CJttJ/rnarory stolemf!f(lt uraJer ooth (or mflrmatlan) by the~, to u.hom the tJol'f/on Is applfc:Gble :shouiJ
om/ rnor/re a port of lhls q:,pllcoflon.}
nly swear (ol affirm) that the statements made on atllha pages of ltlis application are true and that the photograph attached is a likeness of me and
or those persons
(Seal)
Proc~durcu)
APX 190
USCA Case
Case1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 194 of 437
Document 1-1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 63 of 109
- r
; ..
....~ "' ~ ..
}
STANLEY
ANN
DUNHAM
.-~--~------------...,.-:,---~~----~~citizen
1he Unit..:S StJrtas, do hentby apply for (a passport) (regld'Dtlon).
(~)
vJ iC H 1lA
KANSAS, U.S.A.
BIRTH DATE
Momn
Dav
VCH)f
Bl n:h Certl'fleate
O a to:
(Spell ouv
b (~lb
Bcarer'11 Name:
Ft.
_!:L ln.
BROWN
BROWN
No.:
Plac:
~~
~ 2.. !f-.S5 l 0 0
Submitted Herewith
0 Seen &
Returned
USBANO'S
LACE
Bar~1ung,
Indo
Submlttad Herewith
RTH
CHILO(RENI'S NAMECSI
IN FULL
DATE4S)
CHI~D(RENI'S
EVIDENCE
0 Submitted Hrawlth
0 Clnc&lad & Retl.lrnod
0 Suo & Returned
I havo not hand r,o othor person InCluded in thlllapplicotlon has), IInce acquiring Unltod St1to1 cltlzenahlp, porformad onv of the ecu Jlr;tlld In section J
on the revel"'o of thh; application form lunlns explanatory rtottlmont Is ttechod). l11olomnly tWt:tar (or affirm) that tha statumenm m ado on all of the
. .... of tklo applleotlon " """"and tko ohotco ohlol otto<hed lo '""'' a llkonOH of mo and of tho...;"""'"' to bol~dad In tho,po-ort.
J t L
I\
(SEALt
{To ba signd at same time by husband/wife to be included ln pa~sport)
1'1
APX 191
Document #1550250
TO BE COM.
IM M IG FI AT EO TO THE
( Mon1h, year)
Filed: 04/30/2015
u.-10
u.s.
PAGE
. .-tOUGH NATURALIZATION
0
0
0
NATURALIZATION COURT
lOATE NATURALIZED
OCCUPATION
PROGRAM
none
E' WOMEN MUST ~P&..ETE FOL.LOMNG IF CHILDREN OF A PREVIQU; MARRIAGE AAE IC.LUOED OR IF PREVIOl.&LV MARRIED BERlRE MAAc-f3. 1931
I WAS P R E VIOUSLY MARRIED ON
ON ( Oate of blnh)
0
0
FORMER HUSBAND WAS U.S. CITIZEN ~~~REVlOUS MARRIAGE TERMINATED BY QOEATH 0DIVOACl
FORMER HUSBAND WAS NOT U.S. CmZEN ON (Datal
.r a::JPLETE IF AfPUCANT OR ANY PERSON IN:UDED IN SECT10N 8 WM. IIIJT BORN IN neE UNR'EO STATES /IMJ CLAJMS c:rnz:EIGiiP nR::1UGH PARENTf
ENTERED THE U.S.
(Month)
(Ye11r)
IF FATHEA NATURALIZED:
D Applicant
Oste
Certl13cats No,
Piece (City,
0 Wl f9
Hus b and
S~ete)
QChlld
RESIDENCE/CONTINUOUS PHYSICAL
PRESENCE IN U.S. From(Year) Ta (Veer)
O Appll~nt
Q . Wifc
QHueba nd
D ,Chlld
IF MOTHER NATURALtZEO:
Date
Cen\flcaw No.
I
PROPOSED TRAVEL PLANS (Not Mandatmv)
I INTENO TO CONTINUE TO RESIDE ABROAD FOA THE FOLLOWING P&FIIOO AND PURPOSE
Two years contract with Ford Foundation from January 1981 - December 1982.
--~NTENO
R~SiOI:; WITHIN
'T
---
1DATE OF O~PAATURE
tdrn
om
Faflure to provide tht lnformatiOtl raque.Utd on thb form m a y f'CSUit In the denial of a United State~ Paaport, rel81ad doa~melrt or rvlca tD the
indl\lldual Heking such piJISPort, doeumeM or service.
NOTE: The dltcloaura of your Social Security Number or of tha Jdntlty and loC11tlon of ape~ to bo notified In 1h IIVtnt of dea1h or .ccldent Ia
entirely voluntary. Howwer~ failure to provide ttls information m11y prevent the Department at Ststt from providing you with 1lm.ty stlttance or
proUIIOtlon In the ev~tnt you should ancuunwr sn emergency sftuar' ., whllt DU'IS!cM rhll Unit~ad States.
ACTS OR CONDITIONS
(If .,V of the below-mantlonod acts or conditione 1\I!V& b"n performed by or apply to the applicant. or to any o1h pen~Gn to be Included In tha
p.aport, the panlon which applialshould be struck out, and a supplementary explanatory na~ont under oath (or .tfirm~Jon) by the p.,._,n to wham
the par1ion hi applk:abl11 should bo onachud and modu a part of thltappliclltlon.)
I hove not (and no othar parson Included in this cppllcarlon hos}, since acquiring Unl ~d StatM cttlzen!lhlp, bMn naturalized as a cltlun of foreign nato,
taken "" o,m or mado on affirmation or othor formal doclera rion ot alloglnco to 11 torolgn ne10; antarod or Sllrved In the armed force of forwlQn stotll;
acc:aptod or porlormad tha dutlras of any otflce, post, or employment under the IJOvernment of torel;n nate or polltk:al aubdivlalon mwvof; moda
format ranuncledo, of nationality l!lthetr in tha Unl~ed St418a or bcrfore diplomotk or coniLIIBr offlcllf' of th United Sta,., tn a forelon ltwtD; ovar lOUgh;
or dolmod tho benoftu of tho ne tionalltv of any f~oiiJn stato; or been c:onvlct.Jd by court or cou~ martial of compotont jurfrdlctlon of committing anv
.: t o-f tr88110n againsa or attempting by forc:o co overthrow, or IXl ing atms against, the Uni"COd Statet, or conspiring tO ovarthrow 1 put down or to
d=troy by forco, mo overnment of tho United Sta11K.
WARNING: F:.l~ ttDtemonrs made knowinglv Dnd willfully In piiSSport applications Of in Bffidavrmor ottler 1upporting doc:umenu submltUd therewith
are punishable by "fine ond/or lmpriGOnmont under the pravtslonJ of 18 USC 1001 and/or 18 USC 1542. Altenltion or mutilation of P-"'ort IIRied
pununnt to thi' .~~ppllro.rion i<o punishable by flne net/car lmprii!Gnment under tho provbions of 18 USC 1543. The u of a pa.portinvlol.tlon of 1hv
retn lctiont contolned theroin or of ttto passport regulations is punishable by fine ondlor imprisonment undOT IS USC 1644.. All ~ents and
docurnonu Jubmlnad ero subJect to vorificat!Ln,
I
APPL-ICANT'S IDENTIFYING DOCUMI:;NT(S)
0
0
0
0
No.:
Ori1er's Liceme
Place of Issue:
l)thar (5$:-..tclfv):
Issue
Do~ :
0
D
Driver's License
Place of laue:
Oth.r (Specify):
APX 192
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 196 of 437
Docum
nt 1-1 Filed 06/10/14
,.. Page 65 of 109
._,
IDENTIFYII'tiG INFORMAST/iJON
i 't N
'fJt\sTIMtDDLE
-~
'
!.
.T
R3~G
.1<1
r.,....,
P v N 1-/1'9/v'J
t~t1..:.;L 1 NG ~JDRC:SS
155Z68
l
- _I
~'\ 1. ~ n I , 'r
~ -~
_5-1
-~t
Inches
....'J
.AI<:!d Cone
1\lf.l<l (r){IP
DEPARTURE U.A TE
IJC(I_;PA fiUJ
tA3F'I!IL-
..,
i.E/I.:GTH Or STft'r
?IIlLI PPIAIE S
NAMt: IN FULL
/,17 s-41
"JUM~ER
It an;
or beun
Ur,,t.ed St5t03.
maue
knuwiT1~jl'f
,mr1
of 1r.e
~nO rfl,Jf I
ha'.tF.
...
lPIJih.~tu"~r, :lr! 1r:p:o t)r.iJ :Jfll)iih. r. 1t1c rt:S: .. ,, ;ri~ \..: I)'Sh :l:t? (i.J L. ,b~i
ir.cludf"d r~ o l'ifi:i(hJf ,cueri _;,Jtr\Cflt.~r,1 tO tf:..:a .-,~f6 !'ut.:tni~~O r~r;;o1P
.x M~:ZJt1~
'M~
!..l"li.
jJ.s$>.JCjl1 cpph.:illvn Ill .ai!Jda... r1:. UJ .J1hor ~,p~oiJ~Il~ ')(;I rrt.(J[!i ~IL J)ufls:.J\.JlJ(o.: IJ) IJnt: ,jfJ.J.lll lfli~II~.)FliTltl!ll url'lur [tic
1001 and l!l usr: IS.:2 Thu ,olor.:a:t;Jil :ll 'llutriJ!ti11'' of .J pd~:.pol1 I:O:,ll:d lsuar.t :.; :!rr:> ;~ppht-31"'' ~ r:unrs.l'!ll::IC bv linr 31H.l ... lf!1PI!~\1'10nltll11
T'he u~ ol .1 ~-~~~"' ;,., .,jolult< t, ,,1 t''t' rr::,:rO.:IIlll~ thcu~IJ \ p,.r,,:J,dl I-= L,, fill., olll(l .:r "I(.>IJ~I;IlFIII:"I r:'ld!ll IR iJSC I~
E..Vl\..-fL~
: ,:
.e
l~a'
,-
~ tf:::::. . . ~~
.::Jn..
. : 'i.
WIOh.lll '"
- - - - PIOI.i!.ions ol t8 usr.
under 18 USC 15-tJ
UECL.AAAT!ON I d~t:lclr~ !t'iat tt1e st.attJtnl!nt!; ir.,l"!t ''' :ht:i
7"
I.J~.\ !,ttl.:- J ;.51. : .': ...!' ~' ..,T l. ,. ~~- ,t.-.;~ ~.1 .. ,:.~ .u:a ..;,-Ht -, t4~ ~J df' tttfl. 1"-.
ht.\1 :..t ,J1f f ')f'~\,/J( ~=toj(f~'.lltCfl Jf idt:-gtiirtO:'(.
4 ~~
"'.t;.,f'"' ::;Jtc, ~j 'tP1)'~ S~, f.o-~j r'"~ ~t.~ , ....., .f(! !c,<;u: ~!I i. .. f 3 {'..,G'I:J,i"' ,1,t 1e U ... ~C!'ilttt 1
l Od('t"T,.q, y -'ll~;~..; t. f \!tr" \)Hn' f L~t ot ~,: ~ , ..... !~- ! .;t'4.1~~ t~:;:- ;. \. c- tril'rci>: .... ~ ~ l,!~~11. $l.:.~h! ~ ,_...._.l.t!l,~U -1t..t:.:;)h.d.1Ja,t H~f01J~ 11 dd
4 't.n'wl ,..,...., H-,-.,..,:.~r.-r.. ,r .... ~~t~,: !(''';' ~-:-~~-' ..t !f :th P.,It.~ :::.-:t'=' -~' ~~ .....~;~ l ~itJIOt:,_.. :, #o._ :~ r.>. .. - fi\o\ ~~ -.t !j:i." :jr !~~-d S:JtC.'ii lli J h.' 9'\,
L:'Cf'-Yi('.16s'! lt9 a ....~ ut~ ~p ;_._,lh" r~ .. ! ... ~l
f '
;,.,nL~f ' ,,,;n;,J~t '' .. d
-:.rtp'";u~Uf'::lt ~,..: ~ .;:t! I
t ~:~rl '"' .tq.,, ~
II '5 11 l"" ~. n; ~~. 'n: "" :.
,..;--:( . .-,,-" 1f t;;.;,..,:'t:~.u ~f~ 1 .r\Qnl"''lf .,
0~ r.ori"!\tiu'''ll hJ ..N'erUHr-:.v-. l 1' ~:'.. ltf"
:!" ,'f , : . , ~,,.
~'
~~~ ,t v .. r~
t :! .. ; r: j ;_,~~.:.
Fais-t~ ~tillt!ments
#;oog
BEt:TriiVI/r
:it.tt('
pUNf/~
~ l!~l., I~ 9l.z1Jitl 7
'NAP.NING:
Mi1-0LYIV
8rA!VLY
ADDRESS
PHONE
M.11dn1n~
COUNTR:ES TO BE ViSITED
.Nm
.8
X.
.O.PrL.~~TrOt~S VVILlet.~'f
fHE lSS,;r...'YCc OF
>OU~
?ASSPOAf
Rt:(.-F-D ; .:
I "JCi'' '
r.JLijL!
-?
,;..,
_"} i... 1
...
-; .).. . ,
r ..
~:J
I t;'/:o /X J. ..
-------------------------
APX 193
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
.'
lJ 0 = .
I ~I;<
fl-fT Lf 0
Sf.
1-{0IIJOLVL-U I HI
~~JO~
APX 194
96'6;;2-::2
fHq~:t--~45
'-{
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Case No.:
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
Exhibit 13
APX 195
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
DEPUTY CLERK
- . ~~
''Exhibit~"
I. Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris private citizen of the United States the secured
beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust transmitting utility TMCHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK have by
my amended status publicly recorded same with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Georgia for Lamar
County at BPA BOOK 30 PAGES 763 thru 800 on December 5, 2013 at 9:54AM that thereafter is duly
registered with the United States Secretary of the Treasury accepted there on January 21, 2014 at
4:22AM in recognition of and for account
Accrual
and
and am located for service at 593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 Brooklyn, New
York zip code excepted 11238 Cell Phone: 845-901-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws,
I. Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris private citizen of the United States the secured
beneficiary agent, based upon the condition of his natural birth and the terms of the definition of
"natural-born Citizen (NBC) according to the DEED in TRUST shown in Exhibit A, am NBC evidenced
by the above duly recorded and registered filing, and am eligible to be SETTLOR herein.
I, Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris private citizen of the United States the secured
beneficiary agent hereby accept the responsibilities and duties necessary to duly serve this TRUST
publicly without beneficial interest until further written notice unanimously approved by undersigned
Beneficiaries and be reimbursed for my duly recorded time and expense acceptable to the Beneficiaries.
L Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris private citizen of the United States the secured
beneficiary agent as is my public duty as EXECUTOR and SETTLOR (SE'ITLOR) to notify the
Beneficiaries in writing of my actions to enact rules, change rules, communication involving the
enforcement of the claim necessary to maintain the beneficial interest in the TRUST and will seek
approval for all affirmative challenges to be undertaken in the enforcement of the TRUST mandate
expressed in the document shown as Exhibit A, and report monthly to Beneficiaries in writing.
I, the SETTLOR am acting in a public capacity having no beneficial interest in the TRUST per se for
the benefit of the Beneficiaries who may remove SETILOR at will, and for all those "natural-born
1 of3
APX 196
USCA cCase
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 200 of 437
ase 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 F1led 06/10/14
Page 69 of 109
lAMAR COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COURT
lf~llf!f2ijWDE~TIN CIL~~'g~
BPA BOOK
dg
PAGES
DEPUTY CLERK
~
Citizens" other than who are private citizens of the United States who have a secured beneficial interest
in the TRUST but have not become a beneficiary, with the understanding that as directed by the
Beneficiaries that more beneficiaries may be added as directed to be reported monthly in writing.
I, the SETILOR prior to this acceptance has ascertained, and hereby certify that I have reviewed and will
review the Status of all DEED in TRUST Beneficiaries now and in the future, and must find each is a
"natural-born Citizen" who is the in esse Sui juris private citizen of the United States secured beneficiary
agent for the Debtor Trust Transmitting Utility registered with the United States Secretary of the Treasury,
and will maintain a record of the Beneficiaries, present and future status, and report monthly to Beneficiaries
in writing to include any new member of the DEED in TRUST Beneficiaries by amendment.
I, the SETILOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that prior to this acceptance and becoming the secured
beneficiary agent of Debtor Trust CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, that on January 23, 2009, did duly
privately fire BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II, for being ineligible for the Office of President of the United
States (POTUS) and Commander-in-chief, duly served notice upon he and his agents accordingly to no avail of
law to date see the eight (8) page document marked by me as "Exhibit B" at the lower left hand corner of each
of the pages preceded by SETTLOR's Affidavit of Truth as to being a true and accurate copy of the original.
I, the SETTLOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that in anticipation of the necessity of my full time devotion to
remove the POTUS USURPER sought early beneficial use of Social Security funds ve8ted since 1990 rather
than wait until age 67, and as such have dwindled my life time expectation as an expense for which I gave
notice to the USURPER, Attorney General, Secretary of Commerce and Secretary of Treasury of intent to file a
replevin demand for my USA property beneficial interest as personal damages that on November 10, 2009
Plaintiff in OScv-2234 (RJL), 10-cv-00486 (RCL) did file in the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia Judicial Notice of Replevin Demand with compensatory damages of $21,656,250.00 in the
Washington District of Columbia as a result of damages incurred by Petitioner from after January 20, 2009
with the USURPER incumbent ineligibility to office of POTUS failure to leave office when "fired" herewith
marked as Exhibit C by SETTLOR.
I. the SETTLOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that there has been a complete absence of legal remedy to
date to remove the POTl!S USURPER, and therefore with Beneficiaries' permission SETILOR intends to seek
pure equity relief in the Washington District of Columbia United States District Court to enforce and protect
the Beneficiaries' equity claim to this DEED in TRUST at the earliest time possible and will report monthly in
writing of the status of such undertaking.
I, the SETTLOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that on 4 March 2014 the New York State Supreme Court
Appellate Division for the Second Department Judicial panel sitting in review of Appellant's Amicus motion in
Appeal Cases 2012-05515, 2013-06335 and 2014-00297 from orders in the trial court for Index No: 65002011,
to my demand that it provide "for civilian due process of law" rather than the continued martial due process of
law under statutory direct authority of the POTUS Commander-in-chief over the de facto Federal and New
York State Unified Court System courts under statutory authority of 12 USC 95 and 50 USC App. 5(b)
ORDERED to deny "for civilian due process of law" (see Exhibit D).
I, the SETILOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that he is the Plaintiff in New York State Supreme Court for
the County of Kings active Cases with Index No's: 29642-2008 and 21948-2012 that are scheduled for a non
jury trial on 18 June 2014, in that SETILOR intends to enforce and protect the Beneficiaries' equity claim to
this DEED in TRUST therein also; and SETILOR at the earliest time possible will report monthly in writing
of the status of such undertaking, with the understanding that SE'ITLOR has secured the expert testimony of
(2) two expert witnesses for the trial: U.S. Citizen Paul Edward lrey (retired document expert and publisher).
2 of3
APX 197
DEPUTY CLERK
and the British Subject, :Michael Shrimpton, Esq., a Barrister to the Queens's Bench and expert Intelligence
Analyst, a Consultant t.o th8 Intelligence Community a t large wi th the published book "SPY HUNTER" (2014).
I, the SE'ITLOR hereby notify Beneficia ries that as a matter of fa ct based upon the evidence that
before Kenya became an independent state in 1963, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II aka BARRY
SOETORO aka SOEBARKAR has admitted in the 1996 autobiography "Dreams From My Father" based
upon his own biography used by the Publisher to promote Book sales for 16 years, that he was born in
Mombasa Kenya of a natural father who was both a s ubject of the British Throne and of the Sultanate of
Zanzibar, and, according to a knowledgeable member of the intelligence community consulting with
SETTLOR herein, is born of a mother, out of wedlock to his natural father, who is a Indonesian citizen,
and as such renders the incumbent of the POTUS, a USURPER, because in keeping with the DEED in
TRUST by the NBC definition shown in Exhibit A, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II is not NBC.
I, the SETILOR hereby notify Beneficiaries that this original document and the original documents
including amendment(s) to which this DEED in TRUST is based including my Affidavit of Truth as to
those documents annexed in Exhibit that are true and accurate copies shall be filed with the Clerk of the
Superior Court of Georgia for Lamar County before any further public action by SETrLOR shall take
place, and that upon such recording color copies of the original shall be provided to the Beneficiaries
ex:.:..:t:.....:m
=
o=
n=
thl
.=.L....=.=..:=:.=........::-==-~...__
accordingly along with SETTLOR's n~
---1r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
THESTATEOFNEWYORK)
}ss
BEFORE ME, on this day personally appeared Christopher Earl Strunk known to me to be the
person described herein NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS THE EXECUTOR
I SETTLOR OF THE EXPRESS DEED IN TRUST TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
and who solemnly affirmed under the penalties of perjury that every statement given above was the
whole truth to the best of his knowledge.
Subscribed and Sworn before me on this
Notary Pu"'bli~
3 of3
APX 198
2014.
I<:AM/\L P S0"-11
Notary Publ c. St<ll? of New York
No 01SOl08~m48
0udl1r.ed 1n Km0s Count'i
CoJnm1SS10n Exo1res March 31. 20 IS
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page
Case 1:14-cv-009-95-RJL
Document
1-1 Fi ec:f0"6710714-Page7_1_of 109
- 202 of 437
LAMAR COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COURT
p2.
ICE
PAGES......,....._
DEPUTY CLERK
That this NATION of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a gift from GOD, not men, according
to the Declaration of Independence in CONGRESS, July 4, 1776 as the unanimous Declaration of the
Freemen of the thirteen united States of America state, quote:
'When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the polit.ical bands
which have connected them with another, and to assume among the por,vers of the earth, the separate an.d
equ.al station to which the Laws o{Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the
op1:n.ions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separotio1l.
"lVe hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men. are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Crea/.or with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life. Liberty and the mtrsuit of Hapviness.
Thai /.o secure these rights, Governments are insti.tu.ted among Men, deriving their just powers from the
consent of the govented, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the
Right of the People to alter or to abolish it. and to iTZsfitule new Gorerllntl'lll, /ayi11g its foundation on such
principles and o1ganizing its powers in. such form, as lo /hem .-;hall seem most lillPiy to effect llwir So{tl,y
and Happ1:ness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Gol'elnmenl.q long e.qtablished should not be changed
fo,.light and transient cau.ses; and accordingly all experience hath slteLNI, thut mwthind art' mon disptJsed
to suffer, while evils are sufferable, t.lwn t.o right them.wlre.~ hy lJiwlislu:np the forms to ll'htch the.y are
accu.slomed. Bu.t when a lon.g train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing in.uariably the same Object evinces
a design to l'edu.ce t.hem under absolute Despotism, it. i.s their right. it is their du.ty, t.o throw off such
Government. and to provide new Guards for their future security ... "
The Preamble to the Constitution of the United States provides Authority and purpof:ie declares:
We the People of the United Slal.es, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, .insure
domestic Tranqllility, provide for t.he common defence, promot.e the general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and ou.r Posterity, d.o ordain and establish this Constitution for the United
Slates of Amen:ca.
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 15
APX 199
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
DEPUTY CLERK
That WE the People are only those private Citizens under GOD, not public citizens under men, and that
guarantee within this Nation that each Private Citizen's unalienable rights and beneficial interest is
secure in perpetuity as long as the Sovereign People of this Nation act under GOD as expressed in the
Book of Isaiah Chapter 55 Verse 1 thru 5, hereafter quoting from the Ki.ng James Version of the Bible:
1. Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and
eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without tnoney and without price.
2. \Vherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread? and your labour for that which
satisfieth not? hearken diligently unto me, and eat ye that which is good, and let your soul delight
itself in fatness.
3. Incline your ear, and come unto me: hear, and your soul shall hve; and I will make an everlasting
covenant with you, even the sure mercies of David.
4. Behold, I have given him for a witness to the people, a leader and commander to the people.
5. Behold, thou shalt call a nation that thou knowest not, and nations that knew not thee
shall run unto thee because of the LORD thy God, and for the Holy One of Israel; for he
hath glorified thee.
That the geographic border and size of this 1\IA'I'ION of THE UNITEn-STATES OF AMERICA
including its population according to the Census of 2010 is depicted in the map and chart below with a
map showing public and private land that includes the coastal waters out to the limit of 200 miles us
'
j
I
L
-l --
S..oau ollnclan
Albin
Buroa. oll.&nd MMagomRnt
(~Oomtinl
SCudy/Jwea
-.
.
1f
Exhibit A
,__..
_, ___ ..,
ll!!!!lii~iii!!!I!!J!I!!!!!!!!!!!!!'""Iii
iiiiiiiiiilii'f.; u
n.l,_.,.,.,.,,.f,..n,...lt' >.
....... ~ . . _ _ .. Olllaho tii!A.Dt
Page 2 of 15
APX 200
.,,_
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 204 of 437
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 73 of 109
DEPUTY CLERK
State
Populatton
L&M Ar
308,7 45,538
(square
mlbl)
50.744! 7.10%
-710.231
s7(95rl9s BO%
tli'6_35 56 80%
37.253,956
5,029.1 96
3,574.097
897.934
18.801.3109,667,653
1.360,301
1. 567,582
1:2.630.632
155,959 i 5210%
103.718 j 43.30%
. -4~45 I, .6.20%
1.954 i 7 4~
4 .10%
61.255
44,910
300
145
15 747
5,6 17
1.220
58,254
2,279
6.483.602
3.046,355
2.853,11 S
4,339.367
35.867! 4 .50%
55.869 i 2 .6-0%
8 1 15 1.90%
39.7?8 J 11 60%
1.614
1,564
1 ,554
~.6B8
30.8~
. MDry&and
t .328.361
5,773.552
t M!!saps:husntis.
6.547.82!/
~
Arilona
6~392 017
2.915.918
Akaps s
Cnlifomja
Colorado
Conncctiq:JI
pel.rtwafl
FfOI'ida
Ci!OiQta
!1.!:9!
!!UU.'!g
WiD2ii
Indiana
lew~
~
Kentucky
low tana
~-=-533.3?2
; Mkhblan
MfnQ&AA!a
s.JoJ.925
2.967.2~7
Mil!!& jpp j
r
9.8e3:G45 -
Missowi
5.985,927
989,415 .
. Montan
52.068' 17 .30%
SJ.S27'i 292o;y
57,906 9 .70%
6.423! 19 00%
62.747,70.40%
55,564
.a l
~~&~L!Q.lO%
74,705
15.962
1oa
wtd er t he Urz.z.te
t 1Le
War, and hnve at any time since the
34.253
fourth day of July one thousand seuen
54,305
hu.ndrcd and se(Jenty six become
80,280
Citizens of one or other of the United
35.040
Stales, and who shall be Freeholders.
38901 shall be eligible lo the Places of
29.102
9,031
President. Vice President. or Members
7.3~
of either House of the Congress of the
40,842 United Stales. "
1A
5,113
60.902
41.794
7,715
54,582
61,171
,970
58,808
4.544
1 .809
. 38,180
52289
5,202
24,493
53,305.
4 661
,. .5 7lr!b
1,759
9.774
7.60%
7.t;4d 6.30%
55~864T 2il 10%
is.61o 1:?3 s~~
46.907 ! 1 0.~
68,886 l 11 .20% .
145,552 ! 37 .50%
743
494
. NqYiUfa ...
. New JlfU.
8.791.~~ :
, N.O C'groUn!l ~
9,535.4a3
48.711
,351
68,66~
: NebraSA ....
1.316.470
7.3~ ;
t ,614
8.968 !18.
7,417J1~.. ~ ~
t:3s7 ~
s.oso '
7, 112 .
41.599 ;
: .:
14 .60%
~. ~59:
3.831.074
95,997 60 40%
57.982
~ esrvWtnJi ... _._]_?20~_379 ---.-~,.~!I._.!_t!.~.~---?2.1 ?_. ___
sw lltl4nd , 1 .os:?.~?6l
t .04S 1 t s~~
's :
Seulb caroatna . 4.~25 !364
30.109 111 ~
3.5~ I
; Q(Ogot!
Ulah
36,015 .
Vermgnt
. Vimtnia_..
625.741
tJ;oqqJ2~ .
6,~2~,.S4q .
' wesntngton
Wl!!ltAAtAA [). C
.. WrstVkgfaia __
. Wi!!s:onsln
, Wyoming
41.21!_ 14.1_~ ,
261.797 1 4 .20% '
8~.1~ i ~~ . 2~
~-~1 2.
10.995 '
61,n2
1.481
9.250 ~ 15 80'%
_
.
_t?,,!X! .
~7.8~~ .
601,723
61 i 75 .00%
46
1_.o29 ;
26.557 (
563,626
97,100 j 55~
54.279
~5.~96 ~
25g.802 ;
20.3?2 !
7.788 ;
32623
38:662 .
15
Exhibit A
__ 1L~Q.!.~
_~~_,_~ft! .F ._l_~
66,5~ j4 t 00%
Citizen'~
3.537.438!
4.779 735
Afttbffl!W
PRIVATE
mil~~
Page 3 of 15
APX201
42,821 :
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
A}Jif~~161~RDE2rlf~ CLEr~s . CE
BPA BOOK
02
PAGES
DEPUTY CLERK
That the Natural-born Citizen clause does NOT derive f:~om the term of art "naturalborn Subject'\ but instead was derived from ancient consideration of GOD's Natural Law as expressed
in Greece by the works of Aristotle and carried forward for use in Roman law by the works of Cicero.
Aristotle did not define citizenship like the English did in the English common law in which they
did not give any relevancy to the citizenship of the child's parents, provided the parents were not
diplomats or military invaders. Aristotle included in the definition of a "citizen" a person "of whom both
the parents are citizens." ln It is this definition which was handed down through the millennia through
the law of nations and which the Founders and Framers adopted for the new republic. We also see that
the then Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. (21 Wall.) 162
(1875) (Minor) (decided after the Fourteenth Amendment waa adopted in 1868) held that "all children
born in a country of parents who were its citizens becam.e themselves, upon thez:r birth, citizens also. These
were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners" informed that a person
who became a citizen by being born in the country to ucitizen" parents was known in common law with
which the Framers were familiar as a "natural-born citizen." How do we know that the Founders and
Framers looked to Aristotle's view of citizenship? We learn from the historical record that Supreme Court
Justice James Wilson wrote in 1791: ~~~aenerall.Y speaking,' says the great political authority, Aristotle, 'a
dtizen is one p_artaking equally of power and of subordination.' ... In Wilson's view, "a citizen of
e S .a .e WO years; an , WL h z,n t f.at lLme, as paz 0 state or
cou.nl)' tax: or he is between the ages of twenty one and twenty two years, and the son of a citizen." James
Wilson, 1st commentaries on the Constitution. Here we clearly see Wilson referring to what could only be
a "natural born Citizen" as ''the son of a citizen."
We also know that the Founders and Framers studied Roman law. The Framers were well read in
the Roman and Greek classics as is expounded upon in their writings in the Federalist Papers. Jefferson
1
Aristotle also gave us a definition of a "natural born Citizen.'' In "Politics, Book Three, Part II, Aristotle. writing m
350 B.C.E., as translated by Benjamin Jowett, gave us his defmition of citizenship:
"Part II
But in practice a citizen is defined to be one of whom both the narents are citizens; others insist on
going further back; say to two or three or more ancestors. This is a short and practical definition but there
are some who raise the further question: How this third or fourth ancestor came to be a citizen? Gorgias of
Leontini, partly because he was in a difficulty, partly in irony, said- 'Mortars are what is made by the
mortar-makers, and the citizens of Larissa are those who are made by the magistrates; for it is their trade to
make Larissaeans.' Yet the question is really simple, for, if according to the definition just given they shared
in the government, they were citizens. This is a better definition than the other. For the words, born of a
father or mother who is a citizen.' cannot possibly apply to the first inhabitants or founders of a state.
There is a greater difficulty in the case of those who have been made citizens after a revolution, as by
Cleisthenes at Athens after the expulsion of the tyrants, for he enrolled in tribes many metics, both
strangers and slaves. The doubt in these cases is, not who is, but whether he who is ought to be a citizen:
and there will still be a furthering the state, whether a certain act is or is not an act of the state; for what
ought not to be is what is false. Now, there are some who hold office, and yet ought not to hold office, whom
we describe as ruling, but ruling unjustly. And the citizen was defined by the fact of his holding soma kind of
rule or office- he who holds a judicial or legislative office fulfills our definition of a citizen. It is evident,
therefore, that the citizens about whom the doubt has arisen must be called citizens."
... http://classics.mit.edu/Alistotle/politics.html .
Exhibit A
Page 4 of 15
APX202
USCA Case
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 206 of 437
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 75 of 109
DEPUTY CLERK
and other Founders had a love for Roman history and education. The Founders and Framers were great
admirers of Cicero and read many of his works. It is not inconceivable that they would have read this
English translation of The Proposal !Z) and seen the clause "natural born Citizen." This shows that they
did not need to borrow the clause from English common law's "natural bot'n subject..'' Rather, they had
sources that they read which contained the exact clause, "natural born Citizen," which clause also had its
own meaning which was different from that of an English "natural born subject" which allowed children
born in the King's dominion and under his allegiance to aliens to be English "natural born subjects."
A definition of a ''natural born. Citizen" was also provided by the world-renowned, Emer de Vattel in
his The Law of Nations, Section 212 (London 1797) (1st ed. Neuchatel 1758). Vattel had a great
influence on the Founders and Framers in their constituting the new republic and writing the
Constitution. See, for example, J.S. Reeves, The Influence of the Lau: of Nature Uvon International Law
t:n the United States, 3 Am.J. Int'l L. 547 et. seq. passim (1909) (Vattel exerted such a profound political
influence that it is often pointed out that his theories served as the backbone for American independence)
Lee A. Casey, David B. Rivkin, Jr. and Darin R. Bartram, Unlawful Belligerency and Its lntplications
Under International Law. http.//wW\\'.fE:~d-~'>c.org/puhlHat u,n~iPtthl J) J().lfpub dPtaJI.nsp (concerning U.S.
constitutional analysis, "Vattel is highly ,:mportant. He was probably the international law expert m,ost
widely read a1~wng the Framers"). In fact, Vattel continued to be practically applied in our nation for well
over 100 years after the birth of the republic; F.S. Ruddy, The Acceptance of Vattel, Grotian Society
Papers (1972) (Vattel was mainstream political philosophy during the writing of the Constitution. The
Law o{Nations was significantly the most cited legal source in America jurisprudence between 1789 and
1820). The Founders and Framers studied and were greatly influenced by Vattel. R.G. Natelson, The
Orieinal Constitution 49 and 69 (2010) ("Vattel was probably the founders' favorite authority on
international law .... " and his, treatise, The Law ofNations, was their favorite).
What Minor said about a "natural born Citizen, was confirmed in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S.
649 (1898) (acknowledging and confir1ning Minor's American common law definition of a "natural-born
citizen" but adding based on the English con1mon law that since "'[t]he child of an alien, if born in the
country, is as m,u.ch a citizen as the natural-born chi.ld of a citizen, and by operation of the same principle
[birth in the country]"' (bracketed information supplied), a child born in the United States to domiciled
alien parents was a Fourteenth Amendment "citizen of the United States"). This American common law
definition of a "natural born Citizen" has never been changed, not even by the Fourteenth Amendment
(only uses the clause "citizen of the United States" and does not mention natural born Citizen or by
Wong Kim Ark, and therefore still prevails today. Both those U.S. Supreme Court cases define a natural
born Citizen" as a child born in a country to parents who are citizens of that country.
11
11
11
~ Roman law provided: ''Lex MENSIA, That a child should be held as a foreigner. if either of the parents
was so. But if both parents were Romans and married. children always obtained the rank_g_f thti~~he.r.
(patrem sequuntur liberi, Liv. iv. 4.) and if unmarried, of the mother, Uipian." Alexander Adam, Roman antiquities:
or, An account of the manners and customs of the Romans 210 (6th ed. corrected 1807). Cicero wrote in A Proposal:
"The Colophonians claim Homer as their own free Deni?.en, the Chians challenge him as theirs, the Salaminians
demand him again for their own, but the Smyrneans assert him to be their natural born Citizen; and therefore have
also dedicated a Temple to him in their Town of Smyrna. There are a great many besides at Daggers-drawing among
themselves, and contend for him."
A Proposal For Printing in English, The Select Orations of rv1arcus Tulhus Cicero, According to the last Oxford
Edition 17 (Henry Eel beck trans. London 1720).
Exhibit A
Page 5 of 15
APX203
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
32.
PAGES
DEPUTY CLERK
zlf6:
In the matter of Rome's Coup d'etat over the "Accursed" United States of Anterica
On March 4, 1933 Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) assumes the Office of President of the
United States, and with his Inaugural Address seizes and gives ALL Property and persons as
collateral for the debt of the United States in national "consecration" to its prime Creditors, the
Vatican State and Crown's City of London, and as Commander in chief FDR. issues
P roclamation 2039 on March 6, 1933, as the Military Conqueror as if he were "Augustus
Caesar" of the American Republic, declaring a state of National Emergency based upon
The "Trading With the Enemy Act" of October 6, 1917 (40 Statute Law 411);
Congress at the demand of every Governor on March 9, 1933 passes the "Emergency Banking
Relief Act" (12 USC 95a), thereby Amending the notorious World War I Statute "Trading With
the Enemy Act" of October 6, 1917, (50 USC App. 5(b)) (TWEA) , and then FDR issues
P r oclamation 2040 on March 9, 1933, also confirmed by "Emergency Banking Relief Act'
(12 USC 95b) and bringing the 'IWEA inland, imposing Military Government
o
This .Amended 'M! Statute in fact 1 egards all "PERSONS" ''Within the Untt e d States" as
seized property of the federal government to be treated as an "enemy" and uene:i'lay ally, or
ubelligerents and rebelsn by the Conqueror's Military Government.
These "belligerents and rebels" are publicly residing in the Several States Now considered
to be "conquered territories."
By 1939 all American Common Law Civil Process will be gone. In its place will be Roman
Civil Law Martial Process imposed on all "PERSONS" (natural and artificial) subject to
the Conqueror's De facto Equity Jurisdiction of the "United States."
This Martial Process will apply to all Public "United States Citizens."
This Martial Process cannot apply to Private "Citizens of the United States," Privately
residing on the land at Common Law, while holding Private State Citizenship pursuant to
Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
Exhibit A
Page 6 of 15
APX204
USCA Case
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 208 of 437
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 77 of 109
LAMAR COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COURT
8~
PfP,I
PAGES
DEPUTY CLERK
In the passing of this Act which the emotionally distressed Congress never read, the following must
be understood:
1. The "Trading With the Enemy Act," as passed originally in 1917 and amended in 1918, was
tnade to apply to any enemy., of the United States.
If
2. The "enemy" was defined to be "any individual, partnership, or other body of individuals of
any nationality, resident within the territory of any nation with which the United States is at
war."
3. Other enemy Hindividua)s" were defined as "natives, citizens, or subjects of any nation with
which the United States is at war, other than citizens of the United States." These
o.ccitizens of the United States" in 1917 held Private citizenship of the United States without
having been reduced to the inferior citizenship status of being property of and surety for the
State-created Public ucitizen of the United States," which public citizenship status was
imposed on March 9, 1933.
4. The "Trading With the Enemy Act" also defined the term "person." A "person" was "deemed
to mean an individual, partnership, association, company, or other unincorporated body of
individuals, or corporation or body politic." Therefore in 1917 a "person" could mean both a
natural person/Private Citizen of the United States and an artificial person/Public citizen of
the United States in privilege.
5. Therefore, a .. person., as defined by the "Trading with the Enemy Act" DID INCLUDE a
"citizen of the United States," which at the time was a Private "citizen of the United States."
6. The "Emergency Banking Relief Act., of March 9, 1933, amended the "Trading With the
Enemy Act" of 1917 (previously amended fourteen times from March 26, 1918, to March 10.
1930), bringing the ~~Trading With the Enemy Act" inside the United States applying it to .. any
place subject to the jurisdiction thereof' [all the States within the United States) when
previously, under the "Trading With the Enemy Act." all transactions "executed wholly
within the United States" were excluded;
7. The .. Emergency Banking Relief Act' defined any "person" to mean "an individual,
partnership, association or corporation.'' The term "person" was defined to mean a Public
"citizen of the United States." The term "person" excludes a Private "citizen of the United
States."
H. Therefore, the "Trading with the Enemy Act" defined a "person" to include a Private Citizen of
the United States. The "Emergency Banking Relief Act" defined a "person" to be an artificial
Exhibit A
Page 7 of 15
APX205
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
DEPUTY CLERK
Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Federal
statute 12 USC 95a amending and resting upon 50 USC 5(b) does not apply to the Private
- -+-- - - - -'-"-itizen of the United States.
12. Because the individual Private "Citizen of the United States" is protected by Section 1 of the
Fourteenth Amendment, he was specifically EXCLUDED by definition from the "Emergency
. Banking Relief Act,', which act ofFDR's Emergency War Powers Congtess (by way of the
amended "Trading With the Enemy Act," Section 17), imposed a martial process upon the
courts, federal and state, after April 25, 1938.
13. Therefore the good news is, all Private "Citizens of the United States'' are protected in their
private right to a civilian due process of law on a federal level by the Fifth Amendment, and
to a civilian due process on a state level by Section I of the Fourteenth Amendment.
14. Therefore every Private "Citizen of the United States" is neither a "person,, nor "property"
"subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" referred to in the Emergency Banking
Relief Act (12 USC 95a) passed by the Emergency War Powers Congress on March 9, 1933.
15. And therefore, all Private '(citizens of the United States" are not subject to the provisions of
the "Emergency Banking Relief Act" (12 USC 95a) having amended the "Trading With the
Enemy Act" of October 6, 1917, as previously amended on March 28, 1918, now codified as 50
USC App. 5(b)), including a martial due process of law imposed by the amended "Trading
With the Enemy Act" upon any artificial"person" within the United States and 8Ubject to
the jurisdiction thereof," i.e, ''subject to the de facto Emergency War Powers jurisdiction
thereof."
11
Exhibit A
Page 8 of 15
APX206
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 210 of 437
IT6Tr071LrlPage79of109
DEPUTY CLERK
as Amended on March 28, 1918, and Section 5(b) of the "Trading With the Enemy Act"
"The Emergency Banking Relief Act" of March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. Law 1
This Word for Word Comparison is critical in understanding how "The Emergency Banking Relief
Act" (1933) Amended "The Trading With the Enemy Act" (1917) as Amended in substance making
"The Trading With the Enemy Act" t.he Law of the Land of the United States of America.
"The Trading With the Enemy Act" as Amended on March 9, 1933, imposed a de facto Emergency
War Powers Military Government, while ousting de jure Civilian Constitutional Government.
All Courts, Federal and State, now impose a !viartiai Due Process instead of a Civilian Due Process
on every "Person Within the United Stales," Natural and Artificial.
"Trading With the Enemy Act." Section 5(b), 40 Statute Law 411
1917-"That the President may investigate, regulate, or prohibit,
1933-"Duti n f! ti nH of war or during an~ ot ht r p<. ri od or n n tiona I t->tllP r'g'-' IH~Y dPcbt rtJd hy
the President. the President may. tlu:ough any a~t.>ncy that he rnay designate, ot
ot hctwiM, investigate, regulate, or prohibit,
Change l. 1WEA is now imposed inside the geographic United States during a declared
state of national emergency.
Change 2. The President may now create agencies to "investigate, regulate or prohibit."
These agencies will be created during the 1930s. The Securities and Exchange
Commission is created in 1933; its first director is Knight of Malta Joe Kennedy. A host of
other agencies will be created as a result of the Jesuit Order's Fabian Socialist New Deal.
1917-"under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or
1933-"under such rules and regulations as he may prescribe, by means of licenses or
Page 9 of 15
APX207
W(!L' n
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
2PR
29 2014 AT
SPA BOOK
32
1:210~
PAGES
DEPUTY CLERK
'!
Change 3. Banking institutions within the United States are totally regulated by
Congress without limitation. No "Individual" may "hoard" his gold. All gold will be taken
from c'any person within the United States', on June 5, 1933, via HJR-192 (a).
1917-"or silver coin or bullion or currency, tra nsfers of credit in any form (other than
When the Emergency Banking Act of 1933 and the Gold Reserve Act of 1934 outlawed the use of gold, such contracts
became sources of controversy. In the gold clause case Norman vs. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., 294 U.S. 240 (1935). the U.S.
Supreme Court ruled that gold clauses were invalid. However. Congress later reinstated the option to use gold clauses for obligations
(new contracts) issued after October 1977 in accordance with 3 J U.S. C . ..i.l!l(d)(2).
The United States Gold Reserve Act of January 30, 1934 required that all gold and gold certificates held by the Federal
Reserve be surrendered and vested in the sole title of the United States Department of the Treasury.
The Gold Reserve Act outlawed most private possession of gold. forcing individuals to sell it to the Treasury, after which it
was stored in United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox and other locations. The act also changed the nominal price of gold from
$20.67 per troy ounce to $35.
A year earlier, in 1933, Executive Order 6102 had made it a criminal offense for U.S. citizens to own or trade gold anywhere
in the world, with exceptions for some jewelry and collector's coins. These prohibitions were relaxed starting in 1964 -gold
certificates were again allowed for private investors on April 24, 1964, although the obligation to pay the certificate holder on demand
in gold specie would not be honored. By 1975 Americans could again freely own and trade gold.
The Gold Reserve Act authorized the Exchange Stabilization Fund to use such assets as were not needed for exchange market
stabi Iization to deal in government securities.
The Gold Reserve Act had economic ramifications far beyond nationaJ finance. At that time many contracts stipulated that
their monetary tenns could be demanded in gold. Such gold clauses were intended to protect against the United States devaluing the
doJJar. When the Emergency Banking Act of 1933 and the Gold Reserve Act of I934 outlawed the use of gold, such contracts became
sources of controversy. In the gold clause case Norman vs. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., 294 U.S. 240 (1935), the U.S. Supreme
Court ruled that gold clauses were invalid. However, Congress later reinstated the option to use gold clauses for obligations (new
contracts) issued after October 1977 in accordance with 3 I U.S.C . .21.11(d)(2).
The 2008 decision 2 I 6 .Jamaica Avenue, LLC vs S&R Playhouse Realty Co. established that a gold clause in contracts signed
before 1933 was only suspended not erased, and under certain limited circumstances might be reactivated.
Exhibit A
Page 10 of 15
APX208
USCA Case
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 212 of 437
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 81 of 109
LAMAR COUNTY. GA. SUPERIOR COURT
FILED & RECORDED IN CL,.E~~:t~lCE
~a% 2Q\6. AT
K
02
f 2.tU~
PAGES
DEPUTY CLERK
Change 4. The provision excluding the T\\'EA of October 6, 1917, a s amended from
r e gulating t r ansactions executed wholly w ithin the Un ited Stat es is eliminated . All
foreig n a nd domestic t ran sactions of "any p erson within the Uni ted States', is t o be
investigated, regulated or prohibited.
any~
transaction to fu r nish
1933-"or any place subject to the jurisd iction thereof; and the President may req uire
any person engaged i n any tran saction referred to in this subdivision to fu r nish
Change 5. The "new jurisdiction of the United States" established by the emergency war
powers military government of the United States u nder Proclamation 2040 app roved and
confirmed by the EBRA amending the 'IWEA, n ow extend s to a ll states and territories.
1917-"under oath, complete information relat ive thereto, i n clud ing t h e p roduction
1933-"under oath, complete information relative thereto, including the production
1917-"of any books of account, contracts, lette r s or oth er paper s, i n con nect ion
1933-"of any books of account, cont racts, letters or other papers, in connection
1917-"therewith in the custody or contr ol of such per son, either b efore or a fter
1933-"therewith in the custody or contr ol of such p erson, either b efore o r after
both~
Exhibit A
Page 11 of 15
APX209
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
213 of 437
-Page82Page
6ff09
DEPUTY CLERK
Change 6. New penalties are imposed for violating the amended 'IWEA extended into the
United States affecting "'any person within the United States" (natural or artificial)
"subject to the jurisdiction thereof,, namely, to the newly imposed, non-civilian,
emergency war powers, martial jurisdiction of the United States.
Note: "Person" as defined under the TWEA is identical to a "Person" defined in the EBRA.
However, an individual natural "Person" under the TWEA was a Private Citizen of the
United States under Section 1 of the 14th Amendment. The natural "Person " under the
EBRA amending the TWEA and thereby extending the TWEA into the United States is a
Public "U.S. citizen" treated like a corporation in commercial privilege.
CONCLUSION
Citizenship Status and Jurisdiction of the United States
I. Private Citizenship of the United States, Section 1, 14th Amendment
'sAU persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction
thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.,
A. An individual is a natural "person."
B. That individual natural "person" is "born or naturalized in the United States" (the
geographic "United States" composed of the states in union under the Constitution of the
United States).
C. That individual natural "person" is "subject to the jurisdiction thereof," the jurisdiction
of the United States.
D. The "jurisdiction thereof' (jurisdiction of the United States) is the constitutionally~
established, constitutionally-limited, de jure, civilian jurisdiction of the United States that
began on March 4, 1789, and that ended on March 6, 1933, confirmed and approved on
March 9, 1933, by the Emergency Banking Relief Act.
E. The citizenship of the "citizen of the United States" is private, not public.
F. Therefore, the Private "citizen of the United States" under Section 1 of the 14th
Amendment is a "person . .. subject to the jurisdiction of the United States." That
jurisdiction is a civilian jurisdiction.
Page 12 of 15
Exhibit A
APX210
----------
--- - - - - - - - -- -- - -- -------------
USCA Case
Case 1#14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 214 of 437
: 1~0995-RJt Document-r-r-Fttecroo/I01!2rPage 830TI 09
DEPUTY CLERK
FINAL CONCLUSION
The Private "citizen of the United States" is a "person" subject to the constitutional. de jure,
peacetime, jurisdiction of the United States under Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
That peacetime jurisdiction of the United States is a civilian jurisdiction using civilian process
to gain in personam jurisdiction.
Exhibit A
Page 13 of15
APX211
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
TV CLERK
The Public "citizen of the United States" is a "person" subject to the statutory, de {aclo, wartime
jurisdiction of the United States under the "Emergency Banking Relief Act" (codified as 12 USC 95a)
based upon the military "Trading With the Enemy Act" (codified as 50 USC App. 5(b)). All actions,
federal and state, criminal and civil, using martial process to confer in personam jurisdiction of the
emergency war powers courts are founded upon these two statutes.
That wartime jurisdiction of the United States is a military jurisdiction using martial process to
gain in personam jurisdiction.
You are one cf the Sovereign People of the United States of America
Or
You are one of the conquered people of the United States of America
Exhibit A
The End
Page 14 of 15
APX212
USCA Case
Case1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 216 of 437
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 85 of 109
DEPUTY CLERK
That for the rea~mns expre8l;;ed abuve, nutwit.hl:llanding whether a natural person is born within a
State of the United Stateo of married citizen parente, the_Executor and Beneficiaries of this EXPRESS
DEED IN TRUST TO THE UNITED STATES OF' AMERICA are of a singular class separate and apart
from those who are either naturalized or born a citizen, and are unable to certify as eligible for POTUS
one of the conquered people of the United States of America as long as the dejure citizen of the United
States remains the surety-indenture for the Debtor trust with beneficial inter>st in the surety, for that
natural person is the property of the United StateY and is a slave unable to fulfill the duties ofPOTUS.
Therefore, the Executor and Beneficiaries are bound by their registered status as private citizens
of the United States with their bonafide status as a natural-born Citiz()n within the dutie~ and
obligations of this DEED in TRUST to onJy certify a candidate is eligible bRsed upon the foregoing and
shall seek equity relief of a chancelJery court for attempt to USURP the POTUS to the contrary.
That the Beneficiaries for this DEED in TRUST are private citizens of the United States in respect
to the debtor trust entity registered with the United States Secretary of the Treasury with acceptance
cont1rmed for each respective package by Certified Mail with numbers for their account in regards to
the period ending before the filing of this DEED in TRUST and that the undersigned Beneficiaries are
certified natural-born Citizens capable of rendering a decision as to the status of a POTUS candidate.
That Executor and Settlor (SE'M'LOR), who privately is of equal beneficial interest to the
Beneficiaries or any membet of the class defined above in the execution of the obligations of this DEED
in TRUST, is Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris private citizen of the United States. the
secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust transmitting utility rMCHRISTOPHER EARL
STRUNKO as duly registered with the United States Secretary of the Treasury with account . . . . .
. _Accrual
and
and located at 593 Vanderbilt
Avenue PMB 281 Brooklyn, New York zip code excepted 11238 C(.lll Phone: 845-901-6767 Email:
chri~strunk.ws, who upon his acceptance will duly Rerve this Trust publicly without beneficial
interest until furt.her written notice unanimously approved by undersigned Beneficiaries and be
reimbursed for his time and expense acceptable to the Beneficiaries.
The undersigned Beneficiaries hereby enact thi!i EXPRESS DEED IN TRUST and appoint the SETTLOR:
Dated:
~ .(~~,.,.
:.~
"")
;.)_ '('J /
~./
-.sllilii>
Exhibit A
Page 15 of 15
APX213
- - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -
Document #1550250
Case 1 14-cv-00995-R.ll
Document 1-1
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 217 of 437
E.age_8_6_of 109_ _ __
Filed 06/10/14
DEPUTY CLERK
This is a Beneficiary Amendment to the E x press Deed in Trust claim of beneficial interest
in a nd over all the puhlic and private r..eal. ~:-:~ mal. 1~-tiHp hk and mt.nngibk Property within THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA geographic borde r to safeguard and secuae for the posterity of WE
the People of the United States of Americn in the nation given by GOD for securing each private
Citizen's unalienable right~ and beneficial interesl in punmit of life liberty and happiness in
perpetuity, and with the Executor and Beneficiaries duty to this Trust shall guarantee that all
incumbents and future candidate(s) for the Office of President or Vice PreMident of the United St.ate.s
(POTUS) shall be a bonafide Natural-Bor11 Citizen (NBC) private citizen of th<' United States agent
who is sul'ety no mol'e to the Debtor Tru.st Entity in compJinnec with the United States Constitution
Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5. either under 12 USC H5 and 50 UHC App. 5(b) with the Military
-t-- - - - -Uuve rmne nt suthcntt-s o renewec annua
attona ~mergcncy or otherwise (DEED in TRUST).
That for the .-easons expresf'ed above, notwith~tnnding whether n naturnl person is bo1n within a
State of the United States of married citizen parents, the_Exccutor and Hcneficia1ics of this EXPRESS
DEED l N TRUST TO THI'~ UNITED STATES OF AM~RlCA are of a singular class separate and apart
frum those who are either naturalized or born a cit.izen. and are unahle to certii) as l'ligible for POTUS
one ofthe conquered people of the United States of America m; Jong as the dejure citizen ofthe Unitl'd
Stutes remains the surety-indenture fot the Dehtm t.tu~t with benelicial interest in the su~et.y. for that
natural person is the property of t.he United State~ and is a ::.~lave unahlt' to fulfill tlw duties of POTUS.
There tore, the undersigned
if; hound to the l'ule~ and intent of this
DEED in TRUST by the unaninwu~ deeision of the F:xt>cuto1 Sr:TTLOR <'htistopher Earl Strunk and
Beneficiary havf:' authuti1.ed rnt to hccorn c a [)~;EO in TRUST Beneficiary ba~ed upon
my registert>d status as p1i\ah: citizen of the United States with a bonafide natural-born Citizen ntatus
within the dut.ies and obligation::; of this DEED in TI{UST to only certif) a CRndidate i~ eligihle baRed
upon the fmegoing and ~hall s~l\k equtty rehef ot'n chancell('t'Y court tor any meumht.'nt and or attempt
to USURP the P01'US to the couttary.
1.
. the undersigned hett~hy accept tlll' tcrmjo;, eondit ion~ and dutie~ a~ n
B<'neficinry to thi~ EXPRESS DEED IN THUST.
Dated :
-~
private
of the Unit<.'din e~;H~ Sui juris
cit i z~n
transmitting utility
-.,"''.
StHt~:-;;.
4111111
APX214
.,
~~#:~ f.':~:
~-
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 218 of 437
-- --- USCA
-- -- case
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 87 of 109
DEPUTY CLERK
AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH
For a true and correct copy of the Original
I, Christopher Earl Strunk, in esse Sui juris, solemnly affirm, depose and declare under the
penalties of perjury that the attached NOTICE TO THE AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
Notarv P:1
:~.v
d~t
YIJrK
.. l.llly
... :: ;,,dJL.1 J1.
201S
Notary Puhlic
APX215
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
'1
...
.,
Non-O.:nne~t!c
Lt Care- of.
i\ Hl[! ~(
d
De<.la.r ~.an
,;.s;a
tht" AGE-:\T
L~1TED
(jfp(nt CLERK
rx CHARGE OF THE
\\"i\slu.ugton DC ~02~]
.'\0 I H .,. I o I HI '\( il'-11 I\ ~o lit I 0 Pln'\t.lP,\1 ~UTIC[ 1n PRINl.ll'.-\l
I~ r--, < H ll I I 1 > .\ <rI \. I
I~ 1::
L 1<. Ol l '( J'\J I R .\t I
Rc~..Li\-...'d ~(I l:.u:u~tn 21t1Jll :.md r~t:~!\ cJ: I LrJuar~ 2rifr i '
un-
FOI~
THE
I~EC:ORD
\\ n
1a1h ,,, "O l.tmmn ~01)'' dfli.r li1r .._nntrJ~,.t ft:turn.:d & Rt.dratkJ
\.,lllt.'t.' 111
JuJi,.:iuJ
\o_l(:~c I r.l~l. _2
,,f 21
Exhibit B
APX216
&
R~Jnuh:J
USCA Case
Case 1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 220 of 437
Document 1-1 Filed 06/10/14 Page 89 of 109
TV CLERK
---------------
---------- -------
r(
, ..
_,~,
I
II-~
I \
'
1 I
, .
..
,.
.. '
~j
...
'
,. l . 1,.'
~ '
I
1,,
~. \
Exhibit B
APX217
' .. ' .
:'
':: ~
'I I ...'.J .
: *
....
'"i
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
DEPUTY CLERK
;: ,~'f-1 .
. ,~ ~~(~1:; .
.. ~'N--,
'
.... ..,...,~
4~~ ~ : ;~: ~:
,,,.;
I'
. di
I~
: ~ i. '._ ~!
II ,,
J :
{ ,
t l
r )
ir
t:
'
Exhibit B
APX218
t
...........
r.
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
DEPUlY ClERK
The wn;nutc ynu recej,e any rccnnl. dowment. par'-'T. ymJCCC'dinJ:. map, boo\i. "' ullu:r t.htnJ dLjlll!Ul~ "',lh
)'ilU, ~'1\1 are CtlmruiU.ing 'nDICS .liOUJlStJW.lt'C: UJWt"f Rc:nir.:ll StalUit'S of Ihe United St:1tes fir;t ~c11nn
H ContrJCSS. Scclions 540l. 5407 nnd 540ti totahn~ up to S9,()00 m lines ml:d up to 11 yenro in pn!i<m p~:r
~lffid!Wil ymt f:uiLO record Title I R USC ~L'C1ton 20':'! :~lso t:ilrrics fines.. irnpnwruu~t aud
dls'(unliCicatJon of otru;e. If your cowuy auonu:y lultl )UU not lo 1ilc illl}' dO<.-uments hke mmc:. you nrc
.~t1ll Jc:sponsibtc. as I do no DCCCpt lin}' thrdpatt)'mtcrvencr:t. Any ntll.'mcy. tH~nict nnomcy. nr anyone
from th.: ln\\:ymng craft Me all rbkd-JW111ics nnd do noJI 1\nvo n littnsc \o maku a leyul ckll:rmmauon U1
this manc:r Uli lhcy do m.lt ~ Me ilJlc.J You, the: wunty~;h.-rk. &.k nut lli&..-.: uu: uuthonl~ 1u r~prrie:11t
f'..h:. Slwuh.l Yuu tal w uphold Y~u1 swom CJath anti pc:dam1 your duties l will hRv~ no choke but to
1C'CDft! an Affida \'II of C"rimioel CQttJpiAinl ogoinat )' nw and send copy to Your ho ndns company.
Tirlu LXX.-CR.IMES.--CHA. CRL\IES AOAli\S r JliSTIC~
SF.C.5403. F.'lTY ~m who willfully ilL'SUO)'S '-ll .sucrmpt!o t(\ d\.'SUuy. 01. w1th i.nlettllo tnc-.tlvr 1.km-o~.
t.1k~ a.ud carri~ away an) n:cord. pnpcr. ur procttdiOJ of n colli1 t.f justice. filed or dcp05ilcd wilh any
d ...'TJ.= ur offictt ofsuth coun, or MY pa~r. or docunu~nt. nr rca'lfrl filed or deposit-ed in any public offi~:c:.
nr "ilh :tny judicia! or public officcrr. stutll, ,vjtbuu' tcli:rt:m:c: lu llie \'l.llue oflhe record. papn. Juc,;unu:ul~
Ul' pru~ecdtny SC) fHC:O. pA)' fine of 001 ffiOfC lhm't l\110 lhouaiUld OOJlUS. Of SUfTCf imprisonment, Gl hard
la\xlt, not mon-lhiiD ln'C' y~an. or t-ettt (Sec- S_.OS,~4115-4l4 IJ Title I XX - CR fM"FS (,H .t
C'RlMES AGAINST JUSTICE (Dcsuuying. &c . publ11.: ra:<1r!h.l
SEC.S407. tftwo ur rt!Gfe J'ftSUllS in ;my !ii~Ue UT TcniLDr~
lhc: l.-.:t... csch of such pa-son WJI be punitihcd by n fine of not leu than rive hundred nor mor~ '~ five
lhousand dotlrm;, or hy im(li'Uonmcnt. "ith nr without twd labor, nor le!.'~ than !liK month!{ nor mnre th!tn
tat:<t. yr.u-.. ~r by b<rlh :;Lich finv nJulrmprisonmcnt. See f 1977-1991, 200420 I 0. S50C...i\510 I l"11lc LXX.
- CRI~iFS . - en 4 C'RJMES AGAiNST
{Corupiracy to defeat cnfi:lrccnwu 1\flhe IGW1 I
rusncn
SEC ~40ft E\try ('>fficcr. having the custody()( 1\ny ~d. document,
~caum
lirty inur humtrcd and lhn."C.. v,ho frsuuulcnlly lllkcs a"' a)'. Llr witlulnl~"5. or d~tro)~ nny such
f..f'd. t.locumcnl. piper, or pro~:ccdmH, fil< in lufl oU1cc or ~.h..-po11ncd ~o~.rth hun or 111 Ius ~llu)'. s.hatl
JN!Y t1ne nr 1101 morr than rwn lhC\lWmd tlllllan, nr suffer imf'rlmnmrnl at hnrd labor nnl mnrc 1!um lhn.>t:
~C'IUS. ur both. auuJ !.IL:lll mun:m.rcr. forf~l ht~ o1Jicc and be lhn:n.-. iJilorwilrd di~WIIificxl frum hoiJmg
any office undt!r lbe uovcmmcnl of lhe United St.:llc:ti. 1Dcnroyin~ r=;onJ by o fficcr m t:hargc:.}
obhh:rates, (lf
d~strov~. o;
nllcmJ'L' tu do su, nr, "-'llh inl&!OI tu do~ tak~ And l'Mtie'i nw.1y nny rr.cord, f'tl'ICee.hng, mnp.
boot. J,tp:r. document, nJ lthcr lhinl&- filed ur dcposJlct.l with any clerk or ollker of an)' wun of
the: l;nilcd St~h!S. or in iU\r publi..: office.. m \\1lh any judLC:ial or pub he oflic.:cr of lhc= llnitetl
S\&1~.
!lhnll t\c Once; undc."t' th.IR mle nr 1mpn~ nut mnn: thnn thnoc yc.us.. nr ooth
jnj \Vhnclot.'f', havtng lhc ~IUhW)' t.lt any SUt.:h n,.,_-unt, rn)Ce"Clhntt. m(ilp, b{l{tk. docwncOI. flJpct". or
olhat thm~;. Willfully ond unluwfu11)' concc-nh. remo\ C..'\. muttle~. nhliteflUC!i., follilfiL~. or dc:s1rn~'S
1.hc: !CUrle. l'fmU ~ fin~J unLk-r LlW. til.k: w i&npri~aoru:d nuluu.rrc= lh.m dtn:e= y~r"N. ur h,tth; wid shall
tnrfuir hi~ office end be duquaJificd from hulilinJ any office under the Unit'-'tJ SLa.le:s :r..s u.s.cd in
tht:> RIJh.~liM, Ike lenn "office'' Lioe!l not include lhc Offi~ held b}' !lflj' I'Cl'1l1n 4.1 a rc11red offi:r
M th~ An ned fOf\;CS of lhu Unitatl Stale5.
' f-"
Exhibit B
APX219
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Case-1:14=cv=009~5-R;J t- E>ocumenM.-=1-Filed
06-!10/14 - page-92-otl09
DEPUTY CLERK
t W hlk
OllSb
tor an infcrt!nru of IL."gal lr.Jud."' W1) acL ..Jmi~sion or Lont;ealmcnt which ln\'l>t"cs
;a bre~ch of lc:~l dut}. tru!.l or con fid&:nc:e .iu,;ll~ rep()!,Cd and is inj urioos ro illlotht:r.
,lr h) "hicn an undue advanrqc is taken nf annther, ma)' become the foundation for
mtcrmcc: of fraud. and wtlen rhe~ ts a duty to ~peak. the eoncalmem of a material
feet rna) 1\: e~uall> ns wron~ful ~s a positive misrepresentation. Tex. Civ Ai'P 1'14'1
Rfuthr!t't
Hrml. 1-1 .";W.\J R95. t~lfirntcc/ 1""6 .S6t']J 7182 /./1 T!!.r./6-:'i /50 -4. L R.
-( J
I
( W.: cjwignl have nn more righr to dc:clinc the: cxrrcise of jtm~iction whtch is ga"t:n.
Uht.s will snclude the county coun of record jud&c V i~lor CArillo) &han to usurp that
whtch tl\ nut given. f11c mu: m lhe.: tslht:l wuulu he trW!km lu ahc Cunstiluliun
( ,,.~;~, " I '11!11-fW. t) Wht!UI. 16J. t/82 .'J. LLC.:. 1;1_ lfr/1. :49~ U.S. 100.1
["( Wlhen a govc:tnJDCnt ~omes a partner in any trading company. it di..,t!sts il~.:lf.
w for a.~ '-'011C~m~ the l'nU1satriom of thai eompeny. of its sovereign characlcr. ond
takes tha' ot a prt va&c citiun ... h descends lO a level with chose wtth whom It tLuoc ~~rc:
i~l r. and t&U..~' the character wh,ch belongs 1o its as.socia.te.ft and ao the business
"hu.;h is lObe tranbZ&Ued: BarrA ,f Unit~J S/&Jie:s , .. Plunrttn BullA u{Cicmr}llrJ
! ! cs rxl-lf /.'il.JJ.)
f""llu: Unil.:d Slates as drnv.te of commercial paper srand.t\ m no ditl~rem li~t tiaan
any omer dra~'--c. The t lnircd Scales doc1 business on business h:rms. It ill no1
exempted from I he genent rules govemanelhe nghts and dutits of t.Jrawees b}l the:
larg.meu of it~ dealinp and irs ha"ing ro employ genl$ 10 do "hill if done b) .~
prinetpal in pe~nn would fe&\'C nn room fnr doubt Cll!urjiL~J rru.ft ( o v L'nil,_.,;
'itut~s. J /.'I l S liSJI 19../JJ.)
(-Coort.S enforcing mere \t.anUes do DOl aa judiciall). hut mimsterialJ)'. llaving nu
judicial immunicy. and unlike Couns of law, do not obtain jurisdiction by :wl'\'ic\': of
flru<;'--ss nor ~vcn hy 1'\ ;res& and C ompclled r-\ppc:artUlcc. Uo.rwt!ll ,. cJru. Y linn tJrd
11ft 1/.V )
I' "'.mf uf iurtMdic.:tion W.A) nnL he.: cured hy ,;nnsr.mr of tht! par1Ws '''rlwuru11. IJJirtrm
Lnu..tt!lun1 ~ ('I R. J: J f_' S 110 J I J !
7t
...
::;.
t~:-,1
Exhibit B
APX220
'
( ' c. J
.~-
1..1 /1
l
fl
f
. rrc.,r :HiC"'
~-.-
1 ~~
.I
.a
l:ti
:.Jtlir, ,: l c't:
-.. -/
~
~) ~!-'
l l \ ... -~ ,-,
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 224 of 437
11 File6-96f19f14 -P-a~e-93-cf-:1{)9--
-----~c
~aEMS*C~l~:~ev-99995-R:lt-eeetJmeAt
I Judicial
1~
Nolice 1
DEPUTY CLERK
(HA judgment rendered in violation of due process is void.'' World ~flide Vnlk.~agtH
Woad,'ett. 444 U.S. 286, 2Q1; National Bank v. Wiley, 195 US 257; Pennnyer v. Nej
95US714J
r "... the requirements of due pnx.:.ess must be met before the court can properly assert in
personam jurisdiction."' Wells Fargo v Welb,- FarKo. 556 F2d 406. 416.}
f.
pro~s
of law."
Connally
[. ""A statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that
men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its
a."Jplication, violates the tir!s1 essential of due process of law.' (.'omwlJy v. G~neral
C'nn.\Jruclion Co .. 269 U.S. 385J91 ]
[. Whenever it appears that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction~ the court is
obliged to dismiss the action.'" Willy v. Coastal Corp. 503 U.S. 13 I,. 136-37; U. S. v.
Texas. 252 F. Supp 234, 254J
[. "Once jurlsdiclion is challenged, the ~urt cannot proceed when it clearly appears
that the court lacks jurisdiction., I he court has no authority to reach merit.~, but, rather
should dismiss the action." Melo v. U.S., 505 f-.2d. 1026]
[~There
is nu discretion to ignore
la~k
Ut~o1r
n.-.
,.._
Exhibit B
APX221
t,
:
I.
r-
....,
~ne C(Jp:--:.:la:rr~
lff-r
_::'~r. t , .-._-.:.;.r~~~~-st/
(
tl'
.
. ;
'
..
J
,.
""'
!
.
-..
Document #1550250
ease-l.14=-cv:E>6995-R~c-E>ocument+-1-
Filed: 04/30/2015
K~t\ff'ffilfDE~TIN CL ~
SPA BOOK
82.
DEPUTY CLERK
UIVIT'ED STiliTS
POST& SHWJCEtj
------~
-- - - - -
ack
lAbefiRecelpt Number: RE40 0301 908U S
Status: Deftventd
WASHINGTON. DC 20223.
-A.d~~> .)
I_._..... -;')
_ _ ___ ___ ___ _ __
Get current event information or upda1ea for your item sent to you or others by email. ( 81;, ~
Fonna
Exhibit B
No FEAR Aa EEO
Data
FOtA
APX222
Ci
PAGES__._....._-
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 226 of 437
FHed-e611:6/1:4
-Page-95-ot--109
L ;1R COUNTY. GA SUPERIOR COURT
A~W~fiwoe TIN CL ~K' 0 CE
32
PAGES
==--==~;;~~~==~-r=~-----SPA BOOK
101999004
3558250157-0097
.Aagiatered No.
Date Stamp
Procilct
Descriptton
Sale Unit
F1nal
Prfce
Qty Price
WASHINGTON Dt 20223
10.59
lone-3 First-Class
Letter
1.80 oz.
Return Rcpt (Green
Card)
-- Registened
Insured Ya lue :
$10.00
$0.00
Article Value :
Labe 1 :
S2.20
$0.00
RE-400301908US
::.::.:::::
Issue PVI:
$12.79
==========
Total:
Paid
cash
$12.79
by:
$20.00
Change Due:
-17.21
other
infon~at ion
ca 11
t -800-A9< -lsS.
Bill :1000300868752
Clerk:34
****~..***"***********
**"*********"***'"
..........***
HELP US SERVE VOO BffiER
Go to: httP://gx .ga ll~.COI/DOS
Exhibit B
APX223
..
:. : : : -: : : : : ~' '~
.
. . . . .. ..
.. * . . . .
: . . . . _.. !._. _ . "
..
~- .
on-Domestit
In Care or:
-- ---------------------------- X
)
)
Naintiff, )
)
)
v.
U.S.DEPARTMENTOFSTATE, and
U.S. DEPAR1MENT OF HOMELAND
BOOK
PAGEShl
5~fi0TV CLERK
)
)
----~--~~)~-------------------------------
SECilltlTY,
------'--
--------
-----------x
JUDICIAL NOTICE
Plaintiff I Relator
v.
Barack Hussein Ob ma
(alk/a Barry Soetoro) in esse
Defendant I Respondent.
-------------x
PLEASE TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICJ that upon the annexed: (i) a co8( of Relators Replevin Demand
of the Usurpet' Barack Hussein Obama with DCC Chapter 37 16-3701 l; (ii) copy of Relator's
Replevin Demand ofOmy Faye Locke the Usurper's Secretary of the United States Department of
1
DC Code Chapter 37 16-3 70 l- In an action of Replevin brought to recover personal property to which
the plaintiff is entitled, that is alleged to have been wrongfully taken by or to be in the possession of and
wrongfully detained by' the defend~ it is not n\Xti~ to demand possession of the property before
bringing the action; but the costs of the actioo m(ly be .warded as the court orders.
APX224
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Qpf SO8
K
::r
~
PAGES
Commen:o with DCC Chapter 37 16-370 I (iii) a copy ofRelator's Repl!!m:l'Timolhy Franz
Oeithner the Usurper's Secreta!y of the United States Treasury with DCC Chapter 37 16-3701.
tJjti
That Relator Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse, by Special-Appearance herein, declares aud states
under penalty ofpetjury with 28 USC 1746:
( 1) that Plaintiff I Relator duly served the respective demand upon each Respondent I Debtor
by Certified
Return Receipt:
.Debtor- Barack Hussein Obama in esse ...... Receipt No: 70092250000365685338
Debtor- Gary Faye Locke in esse............ Receipt No: 70092250000365685277
Debtor. Timothy Franz Geithner in esse ...... Receipt No: 700922S000036568S34S
(2) that Plaintiff I Relator duly serves hereby notice of the respective demand of each debtor
named above upon the State ofNew York Secretary of State under the Unif'onn Commercial Code
Section 9--501 that governs place of filing. Subsection (a) (2) the financing statement is filed as a fixture
filing and the collateral is goods that are or a.re.to become fiXtures. Subsection (a) (2) provides that the
office in which to file a financing statement to perfect a security interest is the office of the Secretary of
State in all other cases. Pursuant to subsection (b) a fiXture filing for a transmitting utility would also be
filed with the Secretary of State.
(3) That the respective State ofNew York Secretary of State oversees the U.S. Treasury
DiSb'ict that has authority over the property where Plaintiff is in esse d8micile resides.
(4) That a copy of this Notice is filed with the State ofNew York Secretary of Stab: along
with a Ten Dollar filing fee as there required.
~
~
!.!}_,
Dated: NUYember
2009
Brooklyn New York
f- - ~ ~
~
Washington, DC 20500
~>cri ff31T
C - 2
oP.!D
Daniel E. Shapiro
First Deputy Secretary ofState
State of New York Department of State
One Commerce Plaza
99 Washington Ave,
Albany, NY 12231...()()() I
Cert RIR No: 70083230000005905998
APX225
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
N_...~.!1Jtig
Inc~~
or:
5EPYTY CLERK
RE:
TIMELY WITHOUT DISHONOR WITH THE RESTRICTED SPECIALAPPEARANCE NOT A CORPORATION -The Living Soul
Attachment: NOTICE OF REPLEVIN DEMAND FOR RETURN OF
PROPERTY PENDING THE REPLEVIN COMPLAINT
FILING affirmed November 9, 1009 ... Page 2 of 2
Bv:
XHf8LT C- 3 tJf-/0
Page I ofl
APX226
not a corporation
Clnesse
Uvlng-Sou1
DEPUTY CLERK
Ag;onllply, I, C ristoplter -Earl: Stnak, being duly sworn, depose and say:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICf OF COLUMBIA
v.
Baraek Bllllei Obam (a/kl Barry Soetoro) ia --.,
Gary F. Locke Secretary oftbe U.S. Departmest of Commerc:e, aad
Timothy F. Gettbaer Secretary of the U.S. Treasury
----~-----------------
The .Plaintiff sues the Defendants for unjustly detaining the Plaintiff's goods and chattel~ as the
Usurper. Barack Hus&ein Obama, is ineligible to be the President of the United States Trustee I Admillistrator
over any United States Departments and Secretaries with fiduciary responsibilities and the Usutper havin3 been
denied use of Plaintifrs power of Attorney on January 23, 2009 has by Usurper's continued actions that are void
ab initio, intlading the waivers iauod as to Defendant Sccrctarios and othen, pillage Plaintifrs persooa1
property to wit:
A) the Plaintiff's Bond issued upon his birth certificate of CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK after the
birth in New York City on January 23, t 947 in the amount of 19687.5 1r0y ouaces of gold;
B) the Plaintiff's private account at the US Treasury is secured by the Plaintiff's numbered Bond kept at
the U.S. Department of Commerce with the Bond number issued by the SociaJ Security Adm.in.istralion; and
C) The interest acmJOd upon tho Plaintifrs investlbent into COIIUnei'Oe since the year of 1963 tluu now
calculated upon the record by the Social Security Earnings Statement compounded annually at the respective
annual U.S. Treasury Bond Rate from 1963.
And tbe Plaintiff claims that the same be taken from the Defendants and delivered to Plaiotifl; or. if' they
are eloigned, that Plaintiff may have judgment of their value and all mesne profits and damages, which he
estimates at tbe present value of $21,656,250.00 dollars based upon the equivalent current market value of gold
with a net present value of S,Bl7 troy ounces of gold, and 909 troy OWlCeS of gold &CQWDulated in1Brrst oo
Plaintilrs investment into commerce since 1963 besides co~~
B0RGE ANDERSON
lllilf" ~~~~New"*
~=!:?.aoll
~v~
Page2of'2
APX227
~d:@~course
B~
.,._M ~ N\mn~""
/nesse
I
tvlntt..~l
rt
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
--------+c~ai-GJSCFL-+-=1:~14-ev-99995-R-JI=--E>eet:Jment-1--1-Filed-06/-10/-!4
Pa~e-190-ef-:109------
Non-Dorn~t9t
Ia care of:
TIMELY WITHOUT DISRONO WITH TilE RESTRICTED SP CIALAPPEARANCE NOT A CORPORATION -The Living Soul
Attachment: NOTICE OF REPLEVIN DEMAND FOR RETURN OF
PROPERTY PENDING THE REPLEVIN CO:MPLA
FILING affirmed November 9, 2009 ............. Page 2 of2
Page I ofl
E-XHIBIT C -- S dr/0
APX228
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 232 of 437
Page-G1-ef-:1Q9- - - - - -
...-------b~as~e~1:~14-4-fi.lcv-QG99-5-R.Jb-QeGHmeAt-1-1-FHea-Qe/-1Q/-14
Acconllv'x. I, Cllriltopller -Eart: Stnlk, being duly sworn, depose and say:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICf OF COLUMBIA
Ia tile RephMil matter of
Qrtltopher-Earl : Stnnk C Ia esse
Plalatitr I Clalmut
v.
Baraek R
Obul (alk/a Barry Soetoro) Ia eue,
G.ry F. Locke Secretary oltbe U.S. Departmellt of Commerce, ad
nmotlly F. Gelthner Secaetary of the U.S. Treasury
The Plaintiff sues the Defendants for unjustly detaining the Plaintiffs goods and chattels, as the
Usurper, Banick Hussein Obama, is ineligible to be the President of the United States Trustee I Adminiltmtor
over any United States Depertments and Secretaries with fiduciary responsibilities and the Usurper bavin& been
denied use of Plaintifrs power of Attorney on January 23, 2009 has by Uswper's continued actions that are void
ab initio, including the ivers issued as to Defendant Secretaries and Olherss pillage Plainrifra personal
property to wit
A) the Plaintiff's Bond issued upon his birth certificate of CHRISTOPHER BARL STRUNK after the
birth in New York City on January 23, 1947 in tho amount of 19687.S troy ouocos of gold;
B) tbe Plaintifrs private account at the US Treasury is secured by the Plaintiff's numberod Bond 'kept It
the U.S. Department of Comm~ with the Bond number issued by the Social Security Administration; and
C) The interest~ upon the Plaintitra invcsbnent into conunen=e since tho year of 1963 t1uu oow
calculated upon tbe record by the Social Security Eamiogs Statement compounded IDDually at the respective
annual U.S. Treasury Bond Rate from 1963.
And the Plaintiff claim1 that the same be taken fiurn the Defendants and delivend to Plaintiff, or. if they
are eloiped, that Plaintiff may have judgment of their value and all mesne profits and d~ which he
estimates at the present value of $21,656,250.00 dollars based upon the equivalent current market value of gold
with a net present value of S..S 17 troy ounces of gold. and 909 troy OWM:eS of goJd acaunulated interest on
Plaintiff's investment into commerce since 1963 besides costs.
Cll
Earl: SCruk a. .,.
!93 VaDderbqt Aveaae 11281
Brooldya. New' York
Zip Code nempe DMM UW2
Email: c:hrll@:ltnak.ws; Ph- 631-745-6402
GME~RSON
tE~HffJIT
Page 2 of 2
C- t;. oF;o
APX229
~J~~~
~
not a corporation
Clnesse
uvtno-sout
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Non--Dcmesti~
m C$reor:
593 Vanderoitit Avenue -281
Brookiyn, New York
Zip Code exempt DMM 122-32
Christopher-Earl: Strunk C> in esse
Not a (Crrpomtion
Living-Soul/ Affiant
No Thurn Parties
~m ~~2QffE2TIN C]~R~bepiC~
fiABOOK
.32
PAGES:.:l!'S:Q
O~P0TY CLERK
In care of:
--~-------------------------
TIMELY
1XHf8tT
7ot=J0
Page 1 ofl ..
APX230
judice,~
In esse
living-Soul
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
COUNTY OF KINGS
) a.:
)
DEPUTY CLCnK
Assgnllply, I. Chrtltopller -Earl: Straak, being duly sworn, depose and say:
UNITED STATES ISTRICf COURT
FOR Till! DISTRICf OF COLUMBIA
v.
Ranck a.....-. Obama (a/kla Bsmy Soetoro) ia - ,
Gary F. Loeke Secretary of tile U.S. Departmet or Colllmeree, ad
Timothy F. Gelthaer Secretary otthe U.S. Treuary
The Plaintiff sues the Defendants for unjustly detaining the Plaintiffs goods and chattels, as the
Usurper, S..Ck Husaein ~ is ineligible to be the President of the Uniaed States Trustee I Adminimator
over any United States Departments and Secretaries with fiduciary responsibilities and the Usurper having been
denied use of Plaintiff's power of Attomey on January 23s 2009 has by Usurpers continued actions that are void
ab initio. including tho waivers issued as to Defendant SecretariMI and others, pillage Plaintiff's porsonal
property to wit
A) the Plaintiff's Bond issued upon his birth certificate ofCHR.JSTOPHER EARL STRUNK after tbe
birth in New York City on January 23, 1947 in the amount of 19687.5 troy ounces of gold;
B) the Plaintiff's private accxnmt at tho US Treasury is secured by the Plaintifrs numbered Bond bpt at
the U.S. Depertmcnt of Commerce with the Bond number issued by the Social Security Administration; and
C) The inbnSt accrued upon the Plaintitrs investment into commerce since tbe year of 1963 thru now
calculakd upon the record by the Social Security Earnings Statement compounded annually at the respective
annual U.S. Treuury Bond Rate fiom 1963.
And the Plaiatiff claims that the same be taken &om the Defendants and delivered to Plaintiff. or. if they
are eloiped, that Plaintiff may have judgment of their value aod all mesne profits and damages, which be
estimates at the present value of$2 1,656,250.00 dollars buod upon the equivalent curront market value of gold
with net present value of S,B 17 troy ounces of gold. and 909 troy ounc:es of gold accumula!ed inbnst oo
Plaintiff's investment into commerce since 1963 besides~ ~
Cluiltopller-Eul:
a. eue
New York
By:
Pagel of2
APX231
not a corporation
-----------
vv,;:c.~~v -RJL
BROOKL~N.
'
ICE
31AIIUN
New York
112205313
3568880337-D097
=======--====:=========================
Sa 1es Rece1 pt
Product
Sale Unit
Description
Oty Pr'ce
Final
. Price
Zone-3 F1rst-Class
WASHINGTON OC 20230
$0.44
letter
o. 70 oz.
Return Rcpt (Green
Card)
Certifted
label :
$2.30
PoatltgG
t2.80
HQre
$2.8{)
========
$5.54
$0.44
0.70 oz.
Return Rcpt (Green
12.30
Card)
Cert1fied
12.80
700922SOOOo3essa5338
Issue PVI:
=======
ss.54
CJ
WASHINGTON DC 20220
Zone-3 First-class
Letter
'
$0.44
$2.30
Certified
12.80
Card)
Rmrk:led Delivery FM
(Enao~~
. 70092250000365685345
f.2.JO
~NI.
~.wo
Toto!PoccageAFoN
=~s
11.00
$5.54 ~1012009
_
a- stil D/BIA:
GaryFaye!MktlDes~
UNITEDSTATESSECRETARY
f'-
ot/
e4;
u.s. Dvp
r1mtlat cr Commerce
1401 Comdtutlou Aveoua N.W.
Wubington. 0C 10230
======
$5.54
Issue PVI:
$1 Wisdom
(Fnd:r:~~~~~
U'J
0.70 oz.
PSA
$0.44
1----
2.009-- - --
WASHINGTON DC 20500 .
Zone-3 F1 rst-Class
labe 1 ':
70092250000385685277
Issue PVI:
Letter
cz::.;;-=-=~
$4',00
========:::
Tot a1:
$20.62
Pa1d by:
Cash
$20.62
Clerk:04
t2xl-fre,rr
C-
~ orfO
'*" 30
0
0
0
(Endo!McNnl R.lqilftd) . __ _
..s n 1 :1000300896682
12.80
m
F\olum Roe.elpl Fao
so_.oo_--1
~.54
11/10/2009
[JC
ru
hi - - - .- a- St>ru ro - BariCk HltlidRACKa
Otiiiiiiuu~~BA~
c
DIB/A: BA
~~..
NTICn
c s~rcOI ~ SUPERVlSOR{S). HTRS(S'), AG
\"'"
l"- ()(PO Baa
S) lD an~~ Tbe White House
........~-
ASSiGN(
_,. I Avenue tcW
1.-ft{.
11.00 PenlllCI.JI~ ~ACN\
5fllf11.
APX232
..
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
. . C
r. th
. . fC ~EPUJ"(
CLERK
U..
umbia
S Dtstrict ourt 10r e District o
in re Strunk v. U.S. Department of State et al., 08-cv-2234 (RJL)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
On November 10,2009, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, under penalty ofperjwy pursuant to 28 USC
1746,
Am the petitioner herein being pro se without being an attorney caused the service of three (3)
complete sets of the Attachments annexed to JUDICIAL NOTICE declared November t 0, 2009,
and did place a complete set in a sealed folder properly addressed with proper postage to be served
VV~~D.C.20530
20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530
f 0,
Dated: November
2009
Brooklyn, New York
~Q
'
~
Cb~phu-Esrl:Sauak
~YHfBtTC- to CJr/cJ
APX233
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
~ppdlatr
MJ70416
E.lsl
2012~5515,2013-06335,2014-00297
Motion b tho
lana
se. inter alia, Mfcxcivilian due process of law'' on appeals
from three ordcr.soflhe Supreme Court, Kin&s County, dated April It, 2012. March 29.2013, and
December 9. 2013, rcspeL'tivcly.
Upon the papers fil<:d in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition
thereto, it is
E:"-lTER:
~~~
Clerk of1he Court
March 4. 2014
STRL'"NK v NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF HI.ECTIONS
EXHIBITD
APX234
USCACase
Case1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 107 of Page
109 238 of 437
Subject:
Fw: NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE: USDOJ new case filing USDC-DCD OSC June 10, 2014 in matters related to US-DOS and pending appeals USCA-DCC
and SCOTUS
From:
To:
Brigham.Bowen@usdoj.gov;
Cc:
Bee:
Date :
On Friday, June 6, 2014 3:32 PM. Orly Taitz <orly taitz@gmail com> wrote:
APX235
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Set LocatJongraphiC
Pnnt
Ema1
APX236
USCACase
Case1:14-cv-00995-RJL
#14-5327
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Document
1-1 Filed 06/10/14
Page 109 of Page
109 240 of 437
Travel Purpose Must be Permitted on a Visitor (B) Visa
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:32AM, Bill Van Allen <hvanallen@hvc.rr.com> wrote:
RE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/224589500/USCA-OCC-13-5160-Van-Allen-v-DVA-Et-AI-Date-Stamped-Filed-Motion-of-AdditionaiExpansion-of-Time-to-File-en-Ban c-Brief
8lli-fsWf:
Regarding British and international immigration law adjudication including immigration court use of DNA evidence to establish
citizenship familiar relationship and specifically related to the legal probability and the current and intense federal and state
constitutional controversies involvioo DOS. DOD a11d OVA and regarding the constitutional vetting of current CINC/POTUS.
Trave1 Purposes Not Pcrnutted on Visa Waiver Program Examples:
/s/
Dr Orly T~itzESQ
Flag of Japan Japan
29839 s~~tt~pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Sag~bi ~arita, CA 92688 L
ph 949-~-t:zm~9Li'00-7603 Flag of Latvia Latvia
orlytaitzebq.com
Flag of
Liechtenstein Liechtenstein
Flag of Denmark Denmark
Flag of Lithuania Lithuania
Flag of
E
Lithuania Luxembourg
Flag of Estonia Estonia
M
Taiwan Taiwan
u
Flag of United
Kingdom United Kingdom
Flag of
Netherlands Netherlands
Flag of New Zealand New
Zealand
Flag of Norway Norway
APX237
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
NOTICE OF MOTION
v.
TO SEAL AND
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
- - - - --.1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
101 Independence Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
PROTECT MATERIAL
WITNESSES
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the annexed affidavit of Christopher-Earl: Strunk
affirmed November 8. 2014 with exhibits will move with Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and
Local Rules to Seal the Case and order the U.S. Marshall Service secure material witness(es)
until further notice as supplement to the Motion Reargue the Order to Dismiss entered June 16,
2014 in order to Supplement the Complaint filed 10 June 2014 with Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule
15(a)(l)(A), and Rule 19(a)(l)(A)(B), heard before the Honorable Richard J. Leon USDJ at the
APX238
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
20001, before the 24th day ofNovember 2014, at a time desi~a ed.bjhe Court or as soon
~
d
l .---
Noven1ber~,2014
H(!Cr?~
----------------------------
SERVICE LIST:
PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL FOR RECIPIENT EYES ONLY with COURTESY COPY
REDACTED MOTION WITHOUT EXlllBITS TO RECIPIENT:
US Attorney for
Washington District of Columbia
Judiciary Center Building
555 Fourth Street NW
Washington DC 20530
APX239
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
----------------------------------------------------------------x
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at2201 C StreetNW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: 571 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
101 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION TO
SEAL AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
)
) ss.
)
Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
APX240
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
1. Movant is Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust
transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK Plaintiff, the Executor and Settlor for the
Express Deed In Trust To The United States OfAmerica under 12 USC 95 with 50 USC App. 5(b)
and related Law for Martial due process of law herein (Affiant), and with service located at 593
Vanderbilt Avenue- PMB 281 Brooklyn, New York Zipcode excepted 11238 Cell: 845-901-6767
Emai I: chris@strunk. ws
2. That Affiant affirms this affidavit in support of his motion for the Court Order to Seal this case and
Order of the U.S. Marshall Service to secure and protect material witnesses: JANE D. DYSTEL,
JOHANNA SO LANGE SIERRA OK-HEE AN' NEE, SAV ANNAB GUTHRIE, KAREN
HUDES, PAUL EDWARD IREY, MICHAEL SHRIMPTON and the unnamed copyright forgery
process agents at the US COPYRIGHT OFFICE in preparation for sealed testimony before this
Court; and is based upon all previous exhibits that continue from Exhibit 20.
3. That this motion is supplemental to Plaintiffs Motion to Reargue the Order to Dismiss by the
Honorable Richard J. Leon USDJ entered June 16,2014 (see Exhibit 21), and to Supplement the
Complaint filed 10 June 2014 with the Court decision on that Motion pending herein.
4. That Affiant wishes to comply with the Order to Dismiss entered on June 16, 2014 with the demand
that the Complaint having been filed requires a more "simple, concise, and direct" definite statement
in keeping with Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 8(d)(l) and to include all essential parties-in-interest with
Supplemental Plaintiff MICHAEL SHRIMPTON with Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris
secured beneficiary agent for debtor trust transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
Plaintiff (STRUNK), and Harold William Van Allen in esse surety-indenture for debtor trust H.
WILLIAM VAN ALLEN Plaintiff (VAN ALLEN), hereinafter known as the Petitioners, that bring
this Complaint with Petition for a writ of mandamus and preliminary injunction for hearing the facts
of the complaint for equity relief under 28 USC 220 I and 2202, and it being alleged that there is a
matter of malicious infringement of fundamental rights of the posterity of private citizens of the
United States that inter alia under color of law is a diversity matter by interference with a contract and
APX241
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
judicial process; that with such wrongful acts of perjury, spoliation, concealment, intimidation,
forgery, use of false instruments, aiding and abetting the enemy while under a state of war or national
emergency, is misprision of felony, misprision of treason and treason per se done individually and or
jointly by the Captioned and supplemental Defendants: RANDOM HOUSE, LLC., PENGUIN
RANDOM HOUSE FOUNDATION, INC. and MICHAEL GREA YES as to entities RANDOM
HOUSE, INC. and THE NEW YORK TIMES BOOK CO., INC. (aka TIMES BOOKS INC");
ACTON, DYSTEL, LEONE & JAFFE, INC.; and JANE D. DYSTEL, individually and severally.
5. That on or about July 16, 2014, my Expert Witness Paul Edward Irey corresponded with RANDOM
HOUSE, LLC. Counsel Suda May Morris to ascertain their awareness of the subject Copyright
forgery, and to wit Counsel has not responded see Exhibit 22.
6. For the information of the Court, the proposed Supplemental Defendant MICHAEL GREAVES who
30, 1995 filed the copyright application with the US Copyright Office for "Dreams From My Father"
in conjunction with JANE D. DYSTEL, is deceased and unable to testify except by documents and
records of supplemental Defendants.
7. That Supplemental Defendant JANE D. DYSTEL literary agent for the Book "Dreams From My
Father" published in 1995 for the author Barack Hussein Obama II, done while incorporated with
ACTON, DYSTEL, LEONE & JAFFE, INC., now uses the entity Defendant JANE DYSTEL
LITERARY MANAGEMENT INC. as a result of her material involvement her life is now at risk.
8. That Mr. SHRIMPTON had solely intended to testify as an expert witness as to facts and direct
experience related to the ineligibility of Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II to the Office of
President of the United States (POTUS); remains willing to testify exclusively- will do so, and
especially now in light of the matters raised in the trial on his exposure of terrorist matters involving
the 2012 London Olympics that starts in London on Monday 10 Nov 2014 will raise issues involving
the US Intelligence agencies of proof of the illegitimacy of Barrack Hussein Obama II as POTUS.
9. That on September 11, 2014, Affiant appeared with his Expert Witness Paul Edward Irey in the New
APX242
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
York Supreme Court for the County of Kings in the matter of the Petition Strunk v. Jeffries eta!. with
Index No.: 21948-2012 with a Note of Issue ready for trail before the Honorable Justice David I.
Schmidt J.S.C. with a trial exhibit presentation board shown as Exhibit 23; and the Court rescheduled
the Non-Jury pre-Trial hearing for November 24, 2014 and directed Affiant to serve all parties and
with the proviso that were the other side not to appear the Court would itself conduct an inquest (see
Exhibit 24); that Mr. Irey remains able and willing to testify and Affiant knows where he is located.
10. After the September 11, 2014 scheduled appearance with the Expert Witness before the State Court,
Mr. lrey notified me by email that he had found unequivocal proof of the forger identity, explained
with exhibits the false instrument presented by the White House 27 April 2011, is JOHANNA
SOLANGE SIERRA OK-HEE AN'NEE; and further "THE SECURITY PAPER BACKGROUND
ON OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS THE WRONG SIZE!" (see Exhibit 25).
APX243
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Hawaiian birth certificates were printed to is 8 1/2" wide. But the form art remains the same size
and looks as though it was printed to impossibly reduced hashmark paper.
That will not be contested because it is what it is and Obama's BC is like no other from Hawaii
because the hash marks on his BC only ... are smaller. Smaller than the original paper from the
manufacturer because the forger deliberately reduced it by 1/16" in width.
The forger adding 1/16" ofhashmark artwork all along the right side of the background art has
proven computer manipulation because no such hashmark design existed on the original.
The full background of the Obama BC does not match the size of the paper it was supposed to be
printed onto in the copier. This special green hashmark ... sometimes called "basket weave"
paper replaces the white paper normally used in a copy machine.
Of course she probably didn't think anyone was going to spot it and she would be able to reveal it
herself ... and be the hero.
I suspect that if she plans to confess to the forgery ... she would need witness protection first
which could only happen when she does confess,
I don't want her to loose the opportunity to tell it herself. Naturally the people who paid her are
going to be very angry that she planted an escape hatch for herself ... perhaps to claim that she
--------~otarDTi~tol:
e a norma 1 s e prov1 e wou venfY that.
This presentation of mine could put her at risk with the people who paid her for the forgery. The
best thing for her to do is confess to the Court that she prepared the forgery artwork and left her
mark while making sure that the BC could not be seen as authentic.
What should WE do? I think the earlier release of evidence got Fuddy killed and that was not the
intent. As you are aware the best way to keep people from testifYing is kill them and Johanna
could be the next candidate.
She did not need to change what she did. Leaving it alone would have given me no evidence.
She had to know that she was leaving evidence and that is a good thing on her part.
Is there a legal way to do this?
I feel that I must use this evidence in Brooklyn to assure a win ... because it is non-contestable
that the full size be form can not be printed to reduced hash mark art that is actually smaller than
the original security paper sold for the purpose.
Shortly after I found the forger's escape hatch ... I found another problem with the color green
over the form not matching the color of the green around the outside of the form ... plus edge
indicators that the form was pasted from another source with a different hue of green.
That's the second best proof so far ... yet to be finished.
This is really the end for the Obama fake birth certificate."
13. Then on 4 November 2014, Mr. Irey emailed me regarding protection ofthe witnesses asking to
APX244
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
redact all previous references to the forger attached Exhibits see Exhibit 26; and further states:
The evidence is what it is ... and the manipulation of the hash mark background on Obama's
long form birth certificate is now beyond question to me ... and I'm sure ... you will agree.
The invented new hash mark art can be seen here on Savanna Guthrie's lightened photograph.
We see this newly added hash mark art along the entire right side of her pic.
APX245
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
But with the Obama birth certificate ... it both changed color ... (two shades of green on the same
page) ... and it changed size.
Simple things that schoolchildren can understand. But major media and politicians can not
understand.
Once everyone knows the error she placed on the BC ... it will be too late for her to confess it.
Please advise me as to any complications you anticipate ...
I think that If I release this before she gets witness protection ... she looks like a dead Fuddy to
me.
I am going to ask Doug Vogt to mail to your box ... a few sheets of the blank green hashmark
safety paper we bought ... so I can show it to the judge."
14. The Forger ofthe false instrument released on April27, 2011 at the White House Press Conference as
if the Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama II, is now proven by the evidence to be
JOHANNA SOLANGE SIERRA OK-HEE AN'NEE, who is presently alive and residing in Hawaii;
she has direct material evidence linking the White House, Law firm ofBarack Hussein Obama II as
did Loretta Fuddy-- her life is at risk as a material witness.
15. The next witness at risk is SAVANNAH GUTHRIE, a.k.a Savannah Clark Guthrie-Feldman is an
American journalist and attorney, working for NBC News. Guthrie joined NBC News in September
2007 as a legal analyst and correspondent, regularly reporting on trials throughout the country and
that on or about 27 April 2011 worked with the White House to release the forged instrument at the
White House Press Conference; as with JOHANNA SOLANGE SIERRA OK-HEE AN'NEE,
Savannah Guthrie life is now at risk as a material witness to matters before this Court.
16. Then on 7 November 2014, Affiant instructed Mr. Irey and his associates to hold on any release of
evidence shown as Exhibit 26 until further notice by order of Your Honor herein, that MUST be
sealed and the material witnesses protected (see Exhibit 27).
17. Your Honor must admit that I am tenacious and not bashful in exposing matters associated with this
usurper, especially the Jesuits, that others shrink from the task.
APX246
------
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
18. My FOIA case before Your Honor 08-cv-2234 disclosed the usurper's Javanese name
"SOEBARKAH" that as it turns out is associated with a CIA instigated Indonesian SUBUD cult in
which He and Loretta Fuddy are/were prominent leaders under George H.W. Bush's watch at CIA.
19. That according to George HW Bush in his "One World Order" term used in his 1992 State of the
Union speech to Congress, the crowning glory of the election of William Jefferson Clinton in 1992 is
implementation ofNAFTA (HW said he could not have done better than Clinton), and then with the
George W. Bush Administration implementation ofCAFTA, the last of three trade agreements looms
with BUSH IV, Barack Hussein Obama II the Indonesian prince, and now HW Bush's "One World
Order" trade agreement in his grasp to nail our coffin shut--- The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP).
20. Since August of2013, I am associated and collaborate with KAREN HUDES Esq., in practice before
this Court; and that Ms. Hudes has special knowledge as counsel to the World Bank, and for decades
Ms. Hudes had authority over development loans, and particularly the Philippines Central Bank/.
21. There in the Philippines Ms. Hudes gained direct knowledge ofthe legal trust work ofFerdinand
Marcos, for Jose Antonio Rizal whose efforts created a fifty year trust to alienate specie and wealth
transferred from oligarchy families there after World War I, and as such, Ms. Hudes has the
distinction of delegated responsibility from the Bretton Woods conference to verify I certify
signatories to both the Global Debt Facility and or claims by no less than 13 countries to a portion of
the 2 million metric tons of gold, specie and gems that are safeguarded in multi locations known to
the World Bank and others;
22. Further because this is a difficult subject I include an historical summary (see Exhibit 28) approved
for use by Ms. Hudes as an accurate description of the history of the Philippines dating back to
Spanish control and I concur based upon my own information and belief; and emphasize its use in
understanding the present kabuki with the usurper who refers to himself as an "Indonesian Prince"
23. Further, that since the murder of JFK followed signatures on the Green Hilton Agreement with then
Indonesian President Sukamo on November 12 1963, occupied me through the early 1990's when my
HUD project in Brooklyn first met with the office of Stephen A. Solarz, then a US House member,
APX247
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
my curiosity was fed thereafter when he left the House, worked full time on Pacific Asia affairs, and
from 2000 we had several phone discussions regarding gerrymandering per se related to my case
before Judge Gershon in USDC EDNY 99-cv-2168, and about his role as a member ofthe Trilateral
Commission to capture the trust created by Fernando Marcos & Fr. Jose Antonio Diaz S.J.
24. In 2005 I was hired to study the theft of more than Ten Million Dollars from the ex wife ofthe
Director of the Culinary Institute of America and to attempt to recover the funds; and in the process I
studied the fraud conducted by the New York Province for the Society of Jesus in Dutchess County in
its purchase of zoning changes and associated vote fixing arranged by attorney Thomas Spargo for the
Pyramid I Galleria Malls organizations, and
25. Further, as part of my research, I requested that the CIA provide the files on Fr. Pierre Teilhard de
Chardin SJ (buried at the Culinary Institute), the father of the New Age Movement, "Peking Man"
Nava Office of
Naval Intelligence transferred tons of gold from China from no less than 1935 forward and having
died in 1955 and dead for fifty-two years as a foreigner with French citizenship, I did my FOIA
request and wanted to know what records the CIA have on De Chardin, and in response the CIA
stated it could neither admit nor deny any knowledge of any files, and after the CIA invited me to sue;
26. Further, with written permission by the CIA, I filed the case Strunk v United States Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA), Scott Koch, also added United States Department of State (DOS),
Condoleezza Rice, United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Michael Chertoff, United
States Department of Justice (DOJ), Michael Mukasey, New York Province ofthe Society of Jesus
and Fr. Gerald Chojnacki, SJ in USDC EDNY 07cv1196 (ARR) to Judge Ross's chagrin.
27. My further efforts to study movement of gold include my 2011 intervention in the so-called Dragon
Family Case, associated with De Chardin gold transfers, Keenan v Dal Bosco et alii cv 8500 in
USDC SDNY before Judge Jessie M. Ferman with a transcript and related order, see Exhibit 29.
28. For above compelling reasons, the direct knowledge of the named persons with material knowledge
related to the causes before this Court, are at risk as were Michael Greaves and Loretta Fuddy.
APX248
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff wishes the Court to grant this motion to Seal this Case along
with the Motion before your Honor to reargue the Order to dismiss and that essential
parties to this instant action be added, along with the additional transactions being
germane herein for justice to be done, and that the changes to the caption of the
Supplement as to existing defendants be incorporated into the court record for the issuance
of additional summons to each defendants for a preliminary hearing scheduled by the court
along with subpoenas and to ORDER of the U.S. Marshall Service to secure and protect the
material witnesses JANE D. DYSTEL, JOHANNA SOLANGE SIERRA OK-HEE
AN~NEE,
3rd
NatoDe Honukov
Notary Public, state of New York
Notary Public
~ngsCounN
No. 01HA616061 1
Commission Expires 02 1 12/20
APX 249
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 220I C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
WashinQton, D.C. 20505 fax: 571 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
I 0 I Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
ERIC HOLDER, US ATTORNEY GENERAL
950 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington DC 20530
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION
TO SEAL AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES
Exhibit 21
APX250
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF STATE, eta/.,
Defendants.
MEMO
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
FILED
JUN 1 6 2014
RAND~
APX251
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
they are seeking. Furthermore, the statements contained in the plaintiffs' pleadings fall
well short of the "simple, concise, and direct" requirements of Rule 8( d)( 1).
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Preliminary
Injunction Hearing is DENIED, and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED.
SO ORDERED.
APX252
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C StreetNW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
10 1 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION
TO SEAL AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES
Exhibit 22
APX253
Page
1 of2
Page 257
of 437
l------
Sign Out
Home
X-Apparently-To: cestrunck@yahoo.com via 98.138 .105.149; Wed, 02 Jul 2014 19:20:55 +0000
Return-Path: <paulireysecret@gmail. com>
Received.SPF: pass (domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.216.46 as permitted sender)
bHZicyBPcmx51FRhaXR61C4uliBDaHJpcyBTdHJ1bmsgli4uiGFuZCBteXNI
bGYgYmVjYXVzZ.SBvZiBvdXIgam9pbnQgZWZmb3JOIHRoYXQgcHJvZHVjZWQg
dGhiiGFOdGFjaGVkiGV2aWRibmNIUDCoCDCoCDCoE9ybHkgYWNxdWiyVNQg
T2JhbWEncyBVUyBDb385cmlnaHQgZm9ybSBmb31gaGiziGZpcnNOIGJvb2sg
Li4uiCJEcmVhbXMgZnJvbSBteSBGYXRoZXIiiC4uliBOaGFOIAEwAQEBAQNt
dWx0aXBhcnQvYWxOZXJuYXRpdmUDAzE1AgNOZXhOL3BsYWiuAwMwAgNOZXhO
L2h0bWNDAzkCUmVkYWNOVNQgRXZpZGVuY2UucGRmA2FwcGxpY2FOaVV9ul3Bk ZgMDMAX-YMaiiiSG: j2ulnYYWLDvwBpTG8JqOQXYxx5J7nZMs4x6FPpPr745587SY
VS9PZCdCpS79_18o9UZR4r.muFaTcOctpuDSM.dr08yfXsczaRNvzMku8KsL
LVJdvouyfsDYhX9LkLMdlaRb8BsKtevnBn4v1 h8opFcwjETis9om32481 LQ2
TB3io9BmuDh_Dtq918aT89nEiqNOzt3VqRBiqT7sT8mphQxenKbMljVwTe1p
FOntW7wW283kjdgGwpOx1AeuDCMan6PkqDiiCUtiZRdRcdAYTCYOmlf5BJEB
03wAp2_cuaemFq1E.RHha3_bvLOf08hq.dATPZs70nNRZjvcnFh03bmgx.On
jdABo4uZB7snXyf7DVDkfz4GAkgZK9071b_BCPyvyHA2MBUNIWVOoZTeRc6b
L7kTO_be5xkYW8Qd7Z49MWeKtpXzxypAitSqBJCd7_waPYdwg46tNQQwcQcU
bVP5ZVgDX5jBV1tQCqVU801xnMx6AmFOTqSPu2mevdHSHDOkznK8WTcgRs3b
6iZk3sEJqdWfhEWPsEzlxpFCqJ7 .gUrsAZD.tHOFfjGJHOhNyRkszjl3hXjS
xiWkQq4koMSDJibMipRn.K3Z26qCcGgYJTKjsOeP3Csy1818MnYvMPvDdDLz
eiOwxKorV.U2WidfN_qquWvJwnhOkHm.2kCRBrJqyhBOsZGzOGadhHyz5LS
MaanNyy4LcbAOXo0sykUUSnRf4M7xF8x3CHoNiWK.6V5dTyCP9elti.IEgO.
YzCk y i A5AXpp E ZnExl:lzflqtOtO~yeiDI:N::WrdjB-~v:Fw1----------------------------
-0700(PDT)
DKIM.Slgnature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxedlrelaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-
id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+LuRnemaERuLQQRxAQz3FFMqTBF8fChulzrkVISaiJc=;
b=pdWQ/2Jg+tQI05uEU161m0Ga7nbCUPwn3iSk9VN1 a9GY 4/0x91acZMNIGGI70Wh9Gr
bot02wLtkBNK+CuLndSFHTHURHbmMikyoX4iVpMc+Qevz8qsYSK40NuCXBQ79y6BcU2J
41+oTOeauyuhiRm/rYujgG2vz21MgVZOOPnkApEPBZV7ZTWE3dYZFVHMgjRre88abiHU
UuFvOjFWifwADb3EFLT63LAfo5rhE3Z8H//3PCTz4EWGtpDgLJjZ4JqG5WnT3k3aNxK
7zmJzWeOuquVOzEX/hhCZITHTnJaVjssz8vAQpqMErnJLHvMp535K5Dvil7 ArfTOF14yB cQjg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Recelved: by 10.140.82.113 with SMTP id g104mr1!3888876qgd.55.1404328742062; Wed, 02 Jul2014 12:19:02-0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.91 .230 with HTIP; Wed, 2 Jul 2014 12:18:59-0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 2 Jul2014 15:18:59-0400
Message-ID: <CAAXMbtVDM+M5DyZ41jM8N_NGuqVTf_30MRW54t7cQJTdfHiMEA@mail.gmail.com>
subject: OBAMA'S FORGED COPYRIGHT FORM ...
Bee: cestrunck@yahoo.com
Content-Length: 35115652
APX254
https://us-mg5.mail.yahoo.com/neo/b/message?pSize=50&fid=Inbox&mid=2 0 0 1 50091... 7/3/2014
1 Files
PDF
25 MB
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page 2 of2
Download All
25MB
Redaded
Evidence.
pdf
Save
This is a simple story the involves Or1y Taitz ... Chris Strunk ... and myself because of our joint effort that produced the attached evidence.
Or1y acquired Obama's US Copyright form for his first book ... "Dreams from my Father" ... that was published by Random House in 1995.
Or1y asked me to look it over. I found evidence that the document was pasted up manually on a computer to represent typed letters. It was a "false
instrument''. Chris Strunk showed it to an IT professionals and he declared it a fax.
Two of the questions on the copyright form are about the nationality and birthplace of the Author. Or1y's copy said ... "USA" each time.
Obama's literary publicist reported Obama was "born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia" continually for about 15 years.
We may easily guess that the reason we saw a copy of a fax given out from the US Copyright office ... that also had enough forensic errors to at least
dedare it to be a document pretending to be typed in "elite" ... the less commonly used other size of typed letters. Obama and Xxxxxx's ... and now the
US Copyright form join this exclusive club of forgeries done on behalf of Obama.
The US Copyright office will no longer release it. Do they know it's a fax now? That could be why. A fax is not legal to prove copyright. The
document must be mailed in with original signatures and be registered in the US Copyright office.
A law most likely was broken and Obama has no real copyright protection. Of course Random House could produce the original ... or will they claim
Obama's right to privacy like Kapiolani Hospital did when they refused to confirm or deny his being bam there under "medical privacy'' rules.
Copyright's are public documents and cannot be withheld from public view. There are no medical rules of privacy in this case.
Since no valid US Copyright form can be produced ... Obama has in effect ... lost his copyright protection.
Random house publishing would not have used an old manual typewriter in 1995 to type the form. Everyone went to the IBM Selectric in the 70's and
word processing after that. I used Macs only by 1986.
In addition to that problem we have the fact that this editor who signed the form had his name on the form 3 times ... two are miss-spelled as grevaes
It's simple to guess what happened here. The original copyright form most likely listed the birthplace as Kenya and by 2011 that had to be ftxed ... and
that explains why the US Copyright office will not give it out now because they discovered that it's completely flawed and pretends to be typed on a
typewriter ... just like the other two forgeries I have studied for years now ... Obama's and Xxxxxx's be.
How often can we expect to see ... anywhere on the planet ... 3 documents pretending to be typed on an old manual typewriter ... but are NOT typed
on a manual typewriter ... all related to Barack Obama and all done in the Jess used elite typewriter type.
Why would anyone do that? They would just get a typewriter instead. It's a lot of work to place all the letters one by one ... but had she actually used a
typewriter ... the letters would not match other documents at the Honolulu board of health.
So anyone who received the Obama copyright form before 2011 from the Copyright office may have the proof of his birth in Kenya.
It was out there available to the public for 16 years and someone should have it.
I checked on Greaves ... the editor at Random House who signed it and found that he died in Brooklyn in 2006 at 58 years old. Find his obituary here:
http://yNNI.findagrave com/caj-bjn/fg.cai?page=qr&GRid=106337198
And also see the obit pic attached.
Random House surely has a copy. They can't daim medical privacy like Kapiolani did. In fact without a valid copyright on file ... William Ayers can
print the book it in his name since he has already claimed 3 times on TV that he is the one who wrote it for Obama and there is no copyright to protect
Random house now. Bet they would bring out the real one for that.
I believe it was actually Xxxxxxx that messed up and miss-spelled Greaves name in 2 of the 3 places it appears on the form.
No publishing editor would allow that his name be miss-spelled on a government form that he had to sign. Greaves probably never saw this version
that may have been made in 2011 after he died.
We have in our possession 3 documents with all the same problems.
It looks very much like Xxxxxx's handiwork ... and with no typewriter she used her collection of letters from the binder that someone copied for her in
her own office. This copier may have had a distortion at the upper left. The only be's we have from Hawaii that are not perfectly square are Xxxxxx's and
Obama's. Most of the same problems with Obama's be and hers ... match this copyright document also.
Except the copyright form is perfectly square. That's because she would have scanned a blank copyright form on her scanner to get it into the
computer to work on manually placing her letters ... one by one ... and then simply faxed it over to the copyright office directly ... so the office copier she
had was not used in this case.
Someone in the health dept. did not dare to copy the binder in his own office so I presume he simply took the whole binder out to copy at Xxxxxx's
location not far away on her capier and that's why we see the matching distortion on only these two documents.
He would not have wanted to wait for scanning. That would have taken too long. The attached exhibits all have explanations induded.
Also some of my studies concern the appearance of the same typed letters appearing both straight and bent on the same document ... both with
Obama's be ... Xxxxxxx's be ... and of course Xxxxxx's 3rd poor effort at amateur forgery in creating the US Copyright form.
Why have more than one forger to tum states evidence eventually?
Now is everyone embarrassed or what?
3 Forgeries done in the same MO ... all bring each other down. None of them can be authentic.
The gang that couldn't shoot straight when it comes to forgery has just been busted.
Those of you that previously received this evidence from me ... please do not circulate the first one that has the name of the forger on it.
Paullrey
APX255
https://us-mg5 .mail. yahoo.com/neo/b/message?pS ize=5 O&fid=Inbox&mid=2_ 0_ 0_1_50091... 7/3/20 14
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
16 july 2014
First let me say that I have no legal issues against Random House Publishing.
The issues I have with the 1995 US Copyright form for the book ... "Dreams From My
Father" ... by Barack Obama ... are very likely not a result of anything caused by
Random House.
Attac
ages T"vo of the pages are all edged to be the front and - -
back of the copyright form in question. The other two point out some of the forensic problems with that form as was recently given out from the US Copyright Office
in Wash. D.C.
The first problem with the form is that the US Copyright office is no longer giving
it out to the public ... or even to attorneys ... as one patent attorney found out recently. Only a recording answers and no person there will discuss this form.
The reason I got involved is because I am part of a team of researchers that have
developed evidence that the birth certificate released by Barack Obama is a fraudulent instrument ... a forgery ... not a real birth certificate but a document created by
Adobe Photoshop on a Macintosh computer early in 2011.
The attorney that sent me the attached form asked me to look it over for any authenticity issues and I found many ... some of which are described in the other two
pages attached.
A principal problem is that what was last issued is a copy of a fax. That is not
disputed. The issue is how can a fax be copied instead of the original form
page1
APX256
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
that should have been submitted from your firm in 1995 ... and my guess is that
the current form on file is obviously a forgery created on a computer and then
faxed in directly to an insider at the US Copyright office to be used to replace the
original that Random House provided.
This form appears to have been typed on an old manual typewriter of the type
that went out of service mostly in the 60's and 70's. The IBM Selectric was introduced in 1961 and was in decline by 1995 as word processing was replacing office
typed documents. Microsoft Word introduced the software around 1990 for IBM
personel computers ... and by that time the old manual typewriters were not in
use. Myself I was using Macintosh only by 1986. I used these old manual typewriters in the Air Force from 1955 to 1958 ... two of those years were with the National Securtiiy Agency at Ft. Meade Maryland where I typed forms on a Royal
typewriter. Then in 1959 I came to NYC to work for Hearst Publications on the
American Druggist art staff on 55th St. between Broadway and 8th Ave. so I started my career on the same block where Random house is now.
By the 70's I had my own firm .... Bergen Graphics ... that provided typesetting
to Hearst ... Montgomery Ward ... and several other retail companies and I employed 60 people. Typography was my career until I retired ..
In fact the use of the smaller type style ... elite ... on the copyright form is what
was used also on Barack Obama's forged birth certificate ... as this was the size
type used by the hospitals in Hawaii at the time.
The mistakes in attempting to create a typewriter look without a typewriter iin
2011 were easy to spot. Few people know that a certified forensic examiner
named Reed Hayes examined Obama's birth certificate a few years ago and declared it ... "The most flawed document I have ever seen" and prepared a 41 page
report that Sheriff Arpaio in Arizona sits on now saying they will reveal it soon ...
but I'm not holding my breath. In addition ... regardless of the irrefutable evidence
myself & my research partner, Douglas Vogt provided ... media will not expose
page2
APX257
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
any evidence at all on this matter. I have been personally aware of the specific means to
control main stream media on a daily basis. Any mention of any problem with your
copyright's alteration or replacement will never reach mainstream media ... and you are
probably aware of that My work will only appear on the internet
We will contend that the original copyright for Barack Obama was replaced without
your knowledge or consent Otherwise we must believe that Random House Publishing
in 1995 was still using an old manual typewriter to type up their copyright forms. In addition we must believe that Random House ... instead of mailing in the signed original form
.... faxed it in instead. Obiously not legal. Also we see that Michael Greaves signed the
form while his name was miss-spelled twice on the form and only one was correctly
spelled. How likely is that? My guess is that Mr. Greaves never saw this version of the
form and his signature was copied from the original that was on file.
Why would anyone go to the trouble of substituting the original form with a forged replacement? We don't need to look far for that answer. As Barack Obama's publicist was
claiming in print at the time his book was written ... Barack Obama was "Born in Kenya
and raised in lndoneasia." Apparently in 2011 when the birth certificate was forged and released ... the copyright had to be replaced also to change the "Citzen of' part from
uKenya" to "USA" just to cover all the bases.
We have known the likely forger for a few years now. She made a forgery of her own
Hawaiian birth certificate and this document has quite a few identifying similiarities to
both the forged birth certificate of Barack Obama and the present US Copyright form on
file in Wash. DC. Why bring in two forgers and double the risk of exposure?
I can't imaging how Random House will respond on this matter. Nothing I suspect ...
and even less likely would be your firm's release of the original copyright form that is certainly in your files.
Please respond in writing if you feel any statement can be made. With no opposition
from Random House ... I assume I can release my evidence.
page3
APX258
Paul E. lrey
1.
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
I
I
I
II I
I
i
FIGURE 1
'
...
...
,..
aaa a
' a
a a aa
aa
,.,
..,._
""
~ a a a
a.
a
...
ja
!a ~~
a a a a Iaa
OW.
'
i:: -
I~
Ia
ta
..
1.
The vertical rules match the space for the Elite typewritten letters.
2.
FIGURE 2
STATE OF HAWAII
~~IER
Ia.
l(
(Typ~
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
61 10611
151
1e.
or print)
L.ut
N!U~M!
EXACT ACTUAL SIZE OF All HAWAIIAN BIRTH CERnRCATES IS 504 PRINTERS POINTS BElWEEN THESE TWO MARKS
WHEN COPIED FROM THE BINDER THIS CAN BE A FEW POINTS SHORTER DUE TO THE CURVE AWAY FROM THE GlASS
2.
3.
The birth certificate binder and how they are copied from.
ii
):
FIGURE 3
f - - BIRTH
Copier's glass surface
3.
Here is a side view of the binder that holds the birth certificates that
is placed face down on the glass to copy. These binders hold clear plastic
sheets that are locked into the binder to prevent removal. This is why we
see curves at the left side of most of the Hawaiian birth certificates.
APX259
IS IS
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
ewr er.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa~aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaBaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa&aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaQQaaaaaBaaaaaaa~aaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa8aaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanaasaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaa2aaaaaaaaaaaeaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaBDaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanaaanaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaea
aaaaaaaaaaeaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaeaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaeaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeeaeaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaqasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaae
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa~aaaasa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaeaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaoaaaa
ssaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaeaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
This is what a typewriter normally does precisely every time. Machine perfect
alignment vertically and horizontally.
APX260
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
FORMTX
Certificate of Registration
EFFE9rfv~E OF REGISTRATIO~
MOV ao l99l
,
Month
Oar
TE CONTINUATION SHEET.
If publishLod
'"ol
~l\'1!
Number 'Y
Volume ,
l~su~
NAME OF AUTHOR
Barack Obama
USA
Name ol Country
rJtNo
NOTE
On Pages 'Y
Date Y
_liSA ___ .
Anonymous.,
Pscudonvmous?
-.-liSA
r~ Y..-s ~No
rulrucbOns
Name or Country
OR {
No
Cthz~n of ....
Domsclll'C.i int>-,.----~-.~~--------
Bri~?fly d1.~1bc
NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP
P.sc..'Ud<>nvmou~'
No
onstll.ICII:)tl$
Wa~
c:eatn
v..-s EJ
NAME Of AUTHOR Y
D Yes
ves: seedotalled
lllcU .., ,
10 either
o1 tt:ese questions
NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP Bricfl\ J ..-scnb.: natur\.' of matt.-rial created bf th1:. author m whtch copyright is claimoo 'Y
NAMEOFAUTHOR
leavo lhe
space lor dales
ol b~rth and
It the answvr
0 y.,.,
~ N"o
~ .. ._.
Nama ot Country
OR { Citizen of._
Y~ar
Died .,
O No
Dom1ciled iniJI!
NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP Bn...fh d ..'!;Cri~ ni\ture o( mato:n.1l cr...1t..od by thic .1uthur '"which cupyrt,.;h! i" ct.. lm,-d
""
Dlanl<
See IOSitUCIIOflS
!lGioro completrg
!hsspace
19 9 5
_.
---- -----
must be given
Year lnallc:ases.
Month _ _7
_
hlsDeenpubllshed.
----------- _
USA
. -.---~----
_ - .. Nat on
APPLICATION RECEIVED
COPYRIGHT CLAIMANT(S) Nam~ .1nd addrells must bl' given C\'t'n if the clatm.1n11s th~ s.1m1.' ac;
th~ o~uthor gwn in sp.1c~ 2. .,.
_ Day~ _ _
6__ Yeart> _ _ _
NlJ...1.0..19 9_5._____ ..
. __ ----
11.1-'
;~
IE~ TWO DEPOSITS RECEIVED
----------------------------------------------------------------~~~
TRANSFER If the CL11m.lnl(,) nam.od h~r... m j;p.lc~ 4 IS (:~re) Jfl~r..nt fn,m th~ ,\uth.-r(s) n.,m..oJ in
s~ NOV
sp.lCt.> 2. giw ,, brid sl.lt\.'mlnt uf how thL' cl.lim.lntC!>) obt.1lnl'C.i ownership of th copyn~ht . 'Y
':l_fl_j .Q Q c;
~o FUN~Ff~C'EffvEfi
------
MORE ON BACK
Complete all appl ,cable spaces tnumbers S t t) on the reverse s1de ol th iS page
See delaled nstructlons
Sgn the IOtm a1 lone 10
APX 261
1 o1
Js..-~ges
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
FOR
CORRESPONDENCE
COPYRIGHT
Yes
OFFICE
USE
ONLY
..
......
...
00 NOT WRITE ABOVE THIS LINE. IF YOU NEED MORE SPACE, USE A SEPARATE CONTINUATION SHEET.
~--~~--------~~BS~~a.--~~~--m.-.
PREVIOUS REGISTRATION lio1:. fl');l!ltratlUn for thi:. Wtlrk. ur lur .m ~Mh~r \'\.'rst<llllli thts \\'ork. Jln.uJy b..'l.'tl m.td~ in th~ Cupyri~ht Oil to:~?
0 Yes [X No If yuur Jnswlr is ~y..'S; why rs ;moth1.r r~,;istr.11tun ~In); ~IIUJ;ht? (Ch~'Ck .1ppropriatc box) 'Y
.1.
0 Thl!lt:. th~o llr..t publilol"-'l.lt.'l.liuon o(" wurk prt.vtou.,ly n~l:-l<r~'' in unpubli~h.U form
b. C Thi-. ~ the first .1pplic,,liun submllh.-d by thio; author :ts <'llpyright rl;nm.Jnt.
c. 0 Th1' i.' ' ch.mb~-J n r.iun ,,f tlw work. ,\!> ~h,own by sp.~.:~ h <10 thi!\ .lpphc.thun.
If your an~wt.r is
"Y.-s. ~ ~1\'t.""
DERIVATIVE WORK OR COMPILATION Cumpl..-t hulh "P.'cc f>.1 .md i>b tor,, rl!!ri\'Oithc wtlrk: cumplctt. tlnly 6b for , compil.llion.
PrttleisJ.lng Material Jdt.'1\ttly .my praoxistlnJ; work or "vrl-:\ th,,t tht:s wurk ~~ b~,..,-d ''" ll' inrorporo~tl'S ~
~uotes
------
---
..
-.
-- -------
b. Material Added to This Work Ghe a brief, &'-oncral statcm\nt of th~: m.ttcrl.ll th.Jt h.Js bt.-cn .tdili.'\.1 to this work .Jnd in which cnpyngbt is d~m\.0 .
-space deletedc
c~
il
a c cc m onl'
of the boXl'S ht.'l'l" in sp.lCc 8 cun:.tltuh."'> a non""'-"'clus!Ve gr.tnt ut permission to the Library of Congress to ~prod IKe and di'ltribut~: soldr fllf the blind and physicallY
hdnJkappt.-d .:md undLr th conditions and linutilllons pro.."X"rthcd b)' t~ rL0 ulatie>n:o ul th~ C'rynghl Offtec (ll.:optl'S of thl' wurk idlnttft,-d tn spa.:~: 1 of tht:.
apphcalton in Br;ullc (Or stmil.u tactile symbols); or (2) phonor\.'COtds embudymg a f'IX.Jtion of a reading of that work; or (J} both
~
c U f'honorecord-. Only
b 0 Copu~ Only
DEPOSIT ACCOUNT If the registration fee is to~ cholrs'CI to a Deposit Account establlshl'd In the Coprright Offic~. giw name and numM of Account.
Name
Account Number Y
Random House
-~~c
------- _____ _
5975.::7 _ _ _ _ ------- --
CORRESroNDENCE Give nam~ OJnd adJrrss to whtch C\lr~-osponJence a'bour th:s applicatmn should bl ~ont.
Michael
Grevaes~
-------- ---------------- -
of thl! work idl!ntifil-d in this .1pplic01hon and thilt the Sl.ltt.omcr.ts made
by me in this .lpplic.ttinn ilr~ corn:<l to lh lot.."'' of my knnwl..-.t~._.
MAIL
CATE TO
Jill>
iluthor
1-Na,n;y----- --- - - - -j
Michael Grevaes, Tjmes Books, Inc.
;- ------- ----'--- - - N~mblfiStrelttiApartmont Nvmbe~ ~
------ . . -----1
!__ _:_<>~ _EC:::. . ~~~~Street ------------ ----- -i
t
!
- - - --- =.-------- l
t==-
Certificate
will be
mailed In
window
envelope
Bosuroto
------ --
{0
CERTIFI-
10
YOU MUST
C.lyiSUlle/ZIP 'IF
New YOrk, NY
10022
MAIL TO
Attgzstat of CoPV"QIIIS
Ubt:uy of Conoross
Washington. D.C 2055~
17 U.S.C. 506(e): Atry person who knctNingly makes a lal$e represen!.lliOn 01 a matenal W:t '" lhO appbeai!On lot c:opynghl regiSiratiOil proVK!ICIIot by secbOn 409, or 111 any wntten stalement bled 111 c:onnecnon
With the apphcallOrl. snail be 'lned nor~roro tnan S2.500
July 1~00.000
(!} PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
~US GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE t9'3J 342582-BO.OZO
APX 262
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
ew YOrk, NY
ew York
10022
10022
ichael Grevaes
chael Greaves
ic ael Grevaes
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
~y
OR DOMICILE
YYSA
U
~A
USA
---
Taller Letters
WAS1
THEl"
Taller Letters
- - - Anonyr:
Pseudo1
instructions.
\L'
7'
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C StreetNW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:l-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
10 I Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION
TO SEAL AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES
Exhibit 23
APX 265
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Compare these typewritcn lcncrs enlarged from the birth certificate. We h:lve mMkcd
the ones chosen with a blue dOl under the origin;~llencr. Of the 15 pairs chosen,one ~c:tJ'
Irum the word '"Studfllt" that c:llhibih '" o different rype srylc~ uf the t" wit hiD the o;;unc
\\Ord ~ \Uppott our contention that the typed letters wc:te c:opied and a.'i.-cmblcd
~;: a~ree EE 66 11
tt YY i i KU
1
IN
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
61 10641
lb.
(TJPe or print)
1.-t NCDe
BARACK
DUNHAM
T,pe ol Oceupallon Oullicle Home Duriq P~
None
ale
Kapiolani
4. The Start of Line Error
The word "Kapiolani" should be exactly
uoocr the wort.! "Male". not a luJif spau
indentt!d. This is proof offorgery. Also the
fact that not all the lines ;m: flush to the left is
'uspiciuus. No other birth rtificate ~xhihiJs
this ~culwr .ftyle.
The white h;~ln. :;c:en on the online While Hou\C rclc.t~ l'i .I \\ httc nuthnc
.ll'llUnd everthing on the binh ccnificatc. No other birth cenifk:Oite has this . St.:e it t.ln Exhtbll A" belmv
& E:thibit "B" showing how it should look. This wa. <.;IUSO..>d by the Adobe Phntoshop filter u-.ed to
sharpen edges. It Lloc:s this by choking bad' the edge leaving a white h:llo . We show in Extubit ''C"
how we dit.l the same thing to our specimen exa.mple. The Hawaiian Dept. of Health is 'iUppo-.et.llo have
put lbc original binh ccniftcatc on a 1..-opier and printed to a spc.:iul green !\Cieurity paper m~tend
whtte
paper. The nnly result possible fnm th01t is E.'hibit -s". NOTexhibit"A" The h.tlo pm'e' th.ttthc
forger combined a scan of the security paper on a I..'Omputer ... flattened all nf the clemcnLo; in the file ant.!
then applied the Unsha.rp Mask. It is even on the binh ..-cnificate above ... ~ upper left comer. Sim:e
this is a tliJ\!<."t copy of the binh cenificate sclll from Huwaii. that proves the wlutc hulo wa.o; on what
thev .:npicd. o;u we must a\sumc the Hawaiian original has it al'i<.> Tlais is proof offorgery.
or
El lblt I
~=a halo
.1
~omputer ~"Ould
Exhibit A ~~'!~e
llus bmh CCTUftcdlC form "as o.Jr.\tgned for type" nltr.i. so lha1 ccry tune the lyptSI pulled .1 ~..-.un"lle
rerum, it would advOIIIl.-e down ex:to:tly 2 pica. to mat.h
~i~iF-~a
. _.
BARACK i:- ~: :
--.
Congress failing to investigate this forgery is neglecting their constitutional "Duty to Object'~
Document
#1550250
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
Filed: 04/30/2015
)
) ss.
)
I, Paul Edward lrey, being duly sworn, depose and say underpenalty of
perjury:
Page 1
APX 267
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
stripping and all facets of film preparation for offset printing , I have 26
years experience in desktop publishing with Macintosh Computers since
their inception and have used Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator on a
daily basis since their inceptions in 1987 and 1989 .
6. The first Exhibit "A" annexed herewith is a page from a recent issue of
16" reproduction print from Associated Press through their division called
"Replay Photos" that sells photographic items from their news service and
that shown as Exhibit "8" page 3 is a copy of that page purchased as a
true and accurate copy of what the ASSOCIATED Press acquired from the
White House at the news conference on the morning of 27 April 2011 .
Page 2
APX 268
t~aragrapn
1u
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Shown below is an enlorged "CLtlon of the Obdma long torm birth terfltKc.lte that was released onhne at
whitehnuse.gov on 2 7 Apnl 20 I I No ddml'i'iton ha ... been made d" to \\ ho attualh "canned and con\ crt~d tht"
to an Adobe Acrobat PDF tile and posted 1t on the oftJCJdl Whtte Hou ... e \\Cb,ite. It 1s not known if it \\as
someone at the \'\th1te House or ~nmeone at the Honolulu department of health th~:lt hud previousl) provided
two copies of Ob4.tma's birth certJticute that were hand-carried trom Hm,mi to the\\ hlte House.
The important tcature to obscnc is that <..'\erything in black
"The \\ hitc Halo"
1"
The Honolulu dept. of health alleges that the procedure for mokmg <..op1cs of b1rth certifl(_atcs i~ to toke the
binder where the b1rth ccrtificdte.., are stored and open it up to tht:. one the) cop\, piau~ it tac<: do\\ non an
ordinaf) cop) machmc and simp)) cop} the document to green sccurit) paper m~Had of wh1tc paper.
Gi\ en that th1~ rs the normal procedure, I sec no reason for the white halo. I have seen man) other birth
certificates from Honolulu in the ) car and a halt that I ho\ c spend cxamrmng this issue of forgel), and can
attest that none of those other birth certificates from Hm\ aii had a white halo.
TwlaEJ Tri
f Birth 1 Ot)'t Town or Rural Loeatloa
Honolu]u
Honolulu
1
6085
K8lananaole Higl
APX 269
Paragraph
11
USCA
Case #14-5327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Shown below is what we should have seen if the birth certificate original form was
actualv cooied to the areen securitv oaoer and we would see no white halo. Cooiers
do not print white, which is the only way white could be seen anywhere over this
green security paper. I was able to purchase this special paper on the internet. The
green color and hash marks are dye printed through to the other side _ In other words
the paper is green on both sides and there is no white anywhere.
J
- ,-
- -
-.I
-J
I .
,-
'
3.
0
608
page 4
APX 270
Paragraph 12
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
To answer the question as to how the white halo happened, I show the example below.
On the left is a copy from the White House release. On the right is my example of a
computer created halo. I have put a white halo on paragraph 11 using the unsharp
mask filter found in Adobe Photoshop. The settings I used
unsharp Mask
are seen here to the right. As I see it, the forger made the
forgery on a computer, used a scan of the security paper
and included it in the file with the other elements of the
forgery. Then after flattening all the layers, applied the
unsharp mask filter to sharpen up the soft edges of the type.
The forgers serious mistake was to flatten the layers before
applying the sharpening filter. This filter that I have been
1- ,
using for 22 years chokes back the black edges and leaves
Amount 500
white to create a sharper edge. You see it everywhere even
Rad ius 2 t.
ptxels
around the form type and rules. There is no other way in
graphics science to create the white halo seen on both
levels
Threshold 45
documents below, the forgers and mine. Proof of forgery.
_____.
..._.;....
IOIH
BARACK
BARA:CK
Thi Birth
ANN
I Mother 16.
Wichita Aanaaa
Poreip Coun
Mother 16.
.8
page 5
WichitA
APX 271
Dl
PDHi&n Cou
Aanaas
r~
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Paragraph 13
To view a closer and better look at the comoarisons shown in oaraaraoh 14 of the
deposition, see below still showing the original PDF released by the Whrte House on the
left against my own example of a computer creation of the white halo seen on the right.
1
._,
BARACK
Honolulu
6085
K8lanian&
page 6
...
Kalan~ ana
APX 272
Paragraph
14 #14-5327
USCA Case
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
The chatn of evidence for the white halo is proven with this enlarged section of the
Associated Press purchased print referred to in Exhibit "B 1 & 2" that came from the
Xerox copy made at the White House of one of the two originals sent from the Honolulu
Dept. of Health, according to the description made during the news conference at the
White House on 27 April 2012. The White House black and white copier would have
normally dropped out the green security color background along with the white halo.
However I found that by darkening the background of the Associated Press copy, we
are still able to see remnants of the white halo. This shows us that the white halo must
also be on the original sent from the department of health tn Honolulu. We now have
new evtdence on this issue when a Los Angeles law firm requested that the Honolulu
Dept. of Health confirm that what is currantly downloaded from whitehouse.gov website
is thier document. See the next paragraph 15 of this affidavit.
LIVE I
lb. Mlcldle Naae
HUSSEIN
Honolulu
Oahu
Kalanianaole Highway
HUSSEIN
plaH (&Jaocl. Scire or lOI'dp
OBW
Cowl~)
East Africa r
page 7
APX 273
Paragraph 15
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
The f1rst ptcture at the bottom left 1s a sectton of the ong1nat PDF f1le released on
whitehouse gov on 27 Apnl 2012 . It represents the color appearance we have been
took1ng at for 1 1/ 2 years The middle p1cture at the bottom center 1s a sectton of the
document sent to the attorneys for the MtssJSSIPPI Democratic Party 1n Tattz et al v
DemocratiC Party of M1SS1Ss1pp1 No . 312-cv-00280-HWT-LRA (S D M1ss ) See
attachment "C" , the letter from the reg1strar of births for the
HUE/SATURATION FILTER
..
LEVELS FILTER
~t..veb
the altered PDF file that we must assume came from Onaka.
c _ _)
~
.
.... ~ -
o.,.:.,.........,.,
xs
. . ...,...,..
BLUR TOOL
)6
tn
SAME SECTION OF
AlTERED VERSION
~ft
01 HAWAII
OP HAWAII
a. , .
[)
page 8
APX 274
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
MICHAEL GERUCK
27~---=-:/.//~
No
~3069
Notary Public
page 9.
APX 275
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
-DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
61 10641.
151
lc:.
(Type or print)
OBAMA, l i
HUSSEIN
BARACK
If Twin or Triplet,
Wu Child Born
let 0
2nd0 3rd 0
4.
Sex
Male
Lut Name
SL
Day
Month
Birth
Date
Year
August
1961
Oahu
Honolulu
,
Kapiolani
Materr~ty
6d.
7b.
Jaland
Oahu
Honolulu
Honolulu, Hawaii
Street Addrua
No~
YeaO
9.
HUSSEIN
BARACK
Birthplace (Island,
10.
S~ate
East Africa
12b.
Usual Oceupalion
ANN
STJUlLEY
/ / ) /}
22.
Date of Signature
r; j ~I
19b.
Mid~;
J:;l
Other t:j
Date o SJpature
9--'7~/
M.D
8 196 I
18b.
Parenl
c.;/~Othr
19a.
23.
Caucr~sian
DUNHAM
None
18
.a
~~
Race of Mother
QUG
Universit
Student
14.
Race o Father
African
OB.Al-1A
13.
15.
- .)
~te ~ceepted by
Res. General
uUL - S 1961
APR 2 5 I 2011
APX 276
..]).
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
It is impossible for
the Bates #'s to touch.
And Yet ...
Obama's
number
APX 277
Johanna's
number
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
APX 278
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"~~-- taaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
-
APX 279
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
NUMBER
1..
(Type or print)
lb.
DEPARTN
Middle Nme
lc.
BARACK
3.
Lat Name
OBAMA,
Thia Birth
Twin O
61
151
Sa.
Birth
Date
Tri
Month
Day
Ye
August
Honolulu
Street Addreu
6085 Kalanianaole
Mother's l\1ailing Address
a.
HUSSE
BARACK
Close up
of two
typewriter
keys stuck
together.
Colored
red for
clarity.
~,,
..............-
APX 280
@Paullrey2013
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
I ' - '.
~-i.
>
~
N)
00
~
...
--
.....
"
-
J:-
IL
..
.....
.~ .
.. _
..
.......
-,.:r .......
Jt.
I
!I
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
This birth certificate from Hawaii from the Typists would not waste time hitting the
space key to move the carriage to the
same month as Obama's alledged birth
right. Use of the tab saved time. See the
appears to be typical ... and authentic.
horizontal red lines showing the base of
Note that there is no white halo and the
typed letters are perfectly aligned with the the typed letters to be all equal distance
from the form rules. I have removed some
blue forensic typewriter grid. Also note
how the typed letters at the left follow the words to protect the identity of the owner
of this birth certificate who was born 21
curve that is due to the paper curling into
days after the alleged birth of Barack
the binder. Also see the alignment of the
right side column indicating use of the tab Obama. See the "Type with Grid Exhibit"
bar. Except for the "Tennessee" and 'Loui- showing how the manual ...mono-spaced
typewriters would perfectly align all the
siana' that appear to be also aligned with
letters vertically and horizontally.
a tab ... all the typed letters are flush left.
APX282
Document #1550250
APX283
Filed: 04/30/2015
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
ALL 4 ''X''s are off the grid and !prove forgery 4 times
...__._
>
~
7d.
~ {l.
10.
13.
...
...
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
The premise as to why some of the letters on Johanna's birth certificate do not match
for size or angle is that the forger ... not using a real typewriter to create the forgery ...
copied the typed letters from more that one existing birth certificate and pasted the
doucument up letter-by-letter resulting in a variety of letters from different documents.
It is well established in typewriter forensics that no two typewriters are the same simply
because the long arms of the typebars that strike the letters are easity bent. Bending
would frequently happen when a fast typist would get two keys stuck together before
striking and then they would need to be manually pulled apart ... often resulting in bending. This factor has been used many times to positively identify any particular typewriter that may have been used in the commision of a crime.
This is why the forger might have for example ... picked a letter from a document with a
straight cap "H" and then may have used another cap "H" from a different document
where that letter was bent. I show 9 examples of this below that are all from Johanna's
birth certificate proving forgery because when a letter is bent ... it stays bent ... and does
not vary in angle at different times on a single document.
The attached source document shows
all the text as is seen on the birth
certificate ... and then this text was
arranged alphabetically to compare
the letters. The results are these 9
examples of forgery color keyed
to match the location on the
document they came from.
To the right is a
cap "A" marked
as green that is
much wider
and shorter than
the "A" marked
in pink.
Document #1550250
STATE OF HAWAII
Filed: 04/30/2015
DEPARTMINl' OF HEALTH
CERTIFICATE OF LIV
FILl Ill
HUM
a..
I.
Sa
(T7pe or print)
lb.
....
61 ()9945
151
h.
\fiddle Name
LMI Name
SOLANOE
JOHANNA
AH'NEE
v~.,.
D.y
Month
1 Sb.
Hour
1961
Female
unl,.
7d. SfrertActd,.....
>
-------------j
9.
CTJ
Blrihplwr
Honolulu, Oahu
Hawn-Caueaaian-Chinese
KAORU
No~
v"O
Racv cl fatt; t r
l2b.
c.-,,)U2e.
Kind
Steamship Compan7
n...
o1 ~ ....,,
~
-...a
Hawn-Caueasian-Korean
11'7b. -0... a.-a Worl&ccl
PUUKAWA
ne
abo 11ated
..,......._ !. IN~ M4ll C'erf'Ht
ParRI
/;;?~~
.. die . . . el . , kiiOWiedp.
.............,..
wr2"'i'1S&1 Rq.1~
IL EW...
fr Dele~ Fllln1
Of'
U\
Alteration
Oj llb.-
_,I
Dale of Slpatun
:J.J
Document #1550250
lb.
llo-lpllaJ
Year
~961
~u
Jonolulu
1 In
AH 1NEE
Month
09945~
L.t Name
OK-HEE
SIERRA
...61_
151
lc.
Thle Birth Y
.,
J( Twin or Triplet,
Sa.
.<
W., Child Bom
Birth
Sina:leiiJ Twin
TripleeO hi
2nd0 3rd0 Date
ol Birth: City, Town or Rural Location
3.
Middle Name
SOLANOE
JOHANNA
J.
Filed: 04/30/2015
~ahu
16cl.
~ital
7&
lelnd
ahu
Honolulu
7d.
A Kunawai Lane
>
7f.
t. L
aJ
-1
7e.
\'f'a
9.
Birlhpl*' (hlan~cac~ or For~ian fount')') ll2a.
ion
Reefer
~~.
YnO
cCF:ad:u
NoOO
y-
Hawn-Caueasian~Chinese
Atf NEE
..
12b.
Kind
o(
taam.ehi-p Company
e of Mother
SNIFFEN
PUUKAWA
lls.
17a.
a,. .J [36
,J certify)
\hat
Type
Honolulu, Oahu 1
alated 1
18a. 5'--~ of Pa~nl or Other Informant
the above
a.IOI"aa~ it lftle and ~or reel ~ ~ ~
~ #
./
,...
19a.
,.) lie~ eenlly ahaa ahl child ~ ~
-Caucasian-Korean
None
Parent
Other
M.D.
~ ifuGr,bytSsiiR-..1~
o(
~
"-.3
Oll8b.
0
Dale of Slpaaure
?- .")_3 _, /
9b.
Date of Slpaaure
D.O.
" t.on.
21.
No
7g.
Honolulu, Oahu
~l.
fl
M01her' Mail
10.
Midwlre
Other
22. Date Accepted b~ Re1. ~eral
U\l
AUG 2 4 ISS I
THE i-9 VERTICAL BLUE LINES INDICATE WHERE THE RANDOM START OF WORDS ON OBAMA'S BC
OCCUR AT NEARLY THE SAME LOCATION. STATISTICALLY IMPOSSIBLE UNLESS DELIBERATE.
Filed: 04/30/2015
FORMTX
Certificate of Registration
.. 1.\I' J \
' (0
-lla!~'-':,..
~,..,
r. t"'PV~Ir&..rr
,... ... ~ - -
II
EFF[9Ttv,a;(h OF REG STRATIOO
NOV ao\99)
TE CONTINUATION SHEET.
Num~tr Y
'lAME OF AUTHOR...
Barack Obama
W.3!< tha5 contribut1on to tl'k' \.tork .,
pworj( nud~ f r hite" 1
USA
II ~.,.._,.,~ ~
'I.;ATURE OF AUTHORSHIP Bnd'h J ..~~ n.mm : of tnaf\"fllll CtT.ncd b) thb llulh<'l' m h 'l'tch ' OV)' rght
NOTE
LS d Jsm.."-'
Otcd T
0
~
..D
t:-'
0
~
SATURE OF AUTHORSHIP 8m.'fly ~~~.:~.cnbc nacu~ of .,..n m al cn-at~~.-d by thi5 aut~ n whu:h cop;t~gh t.; datm.--:1 ...
c.n
U'l
worl ~
wworlo.
1 .......... -
fur hir..- ?
0Yl'>
'bf1'!0ot~
OR {
:J l"t.l
ntrea~toH~~oet
THEWORK
Ch~..-n of,.
An~y~,.,
Domaoltd an~
0 No ~~:~=t
0 Y.."'' 0 No ~
(' Y.:o
l'~donv~?
NATURE OF AUTHORSHIP
on
Sfoetn~S
Cle'Ott CQ!ri)IO'f'"OJ
:tl~spKI
mJJ~~.
ol ~"'" ar~
c ~"
199- 5
-4
""41 bt gtvtn
Yev iniii QISH,
1\Hbfen~.
eay._
th~
IJII>
APX288
--.--
NJLl(L 19 9.5
!i tJ9~oi-Gt:J~~~
Q
MORE ON BACK
APPLICATION RECEJVfO
COPYRIGHT CLAIMANT(S) Ndm~ .1nd .tdJ~os must bt. gJ\'i.'l\ cn-n ii the ci.J utunt rs thl." s.:~mco .1~
th.:.autlwrgawnan~p.~Cd Y
USA
__
~~t.on
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
F=OR
CORRESPONDENCE
COPYRIGHT
Yes
OFFICE
use
ONLY
00 NOT WRrTE A80VE THIS LINE. IF YOU NEED MORE SPACE, USE A SEPARATE CONTlNUAnON SHEET.
PREVIOUS REGISTRATlON If~ n-,;~rauon fm thD "'w J... or fur .an ~.ulk"'' "~"' urths" "'wk. .aln..h.lv bt."'.'n rn..l\k sn tlw Cp-.n,;ht Otr~..~
:J VH Gt No If ~uur .1nS\Wf' "' -y~'S.- why IS olROUk'r nw3otr.ttutn ~"tn~ ~u~t) (C"'~k .tppropn.u.:o box)
~
b.
Thu; u. th.. l.lr>t rublr~hl'\i alitiun oi wvrk ~"-...-.ul'ly n.,;r:-!n~ an unpubl'""''' tun:n
ol>
YC'.ar of R"Sist~tlon
OERI VATI VE WORK OR COM PI LA.TION C~.Jmpl.:t t>.th ~ N .tnd ~ tnr .s .t.."''t'"'tt'~ wnrk. ('l.lmrk-tt> t1nlv fib fCif a com,Wtwn.
M.atmal jda.'nhl)" anv pn:nisttn,; wnrk w wun., ttwt
w.rit D b-"'-d on.~ ~.Itt'S. 1'
u,.,
A. Prtnis~'nK
. . . .. . ... ..
..
b. MlttNl Addtd 10 This Work C.ivc .J bnri. g~o.-n~o.Toal Sl.lh.'tni."Dl of th~o. m.al\.'f&.ll th.lt h.u. ~"" .td&k"\J to thu ~-urlr. .utd 1n which cupyngbt IS cU1m...J 1'
___________ _
-space deletedREPRODUCTION fOR l..SJ:OFBLIND OR NfYSICALLY HANOI('APPEO INOIVJDUALS A"f.n.lturemtht"'frm.at "f"'"' I O and ~~eht:'l.'k inon..
of th~ bo:~~C'S ho.-rf' 10 ~ce 3 <'llbtlturcs .a non-a.clu:.1W gr.mt oi po:rmi.Non to th .. Lwnry of Congre.s to N'pf\ldlk~ .tn..l .ltstnbuh. ~ch ftJr the t-Und .snd ph}'11tul!v
1\d:\o.Jiupp.."d ~ un.J"r t!l.t' condau pru .and hmtt;atton' proc:~N-d b) tht r."gu llictrb ul the! Cupynshr Otftc.. (I I Ct'IJ:ll'."' ,\[ tha. "''m.. .kn:1i"-d 1n sp41u: 1 of th s
.1pphc.ahon ttl 6t ,ullc (OJ' $IINI..lt t.Ktll~ symbobJ; or ( 2) phonu:Urd~ ~budym~ r~ttM of" f\'a..ltng of th.lt "-'Oflr... or <ll ho:h
N.aow Y
Random Bouse
I ~
____________
59757
CORRESroNDENCE Gaw "''Ilk" .tnJ .W.!r..,.. to "'"'lt'h arr~~,-nc~ ~!)out rh.s appflcatwn sbouhl t~~o. "-"'t
House Inc
...,_
~nCC: ~<.
uf t'.U:hn.l'I.C ri~lb)
by II'(' nthb -' P~ ic;u ltu' ;u, cor n'Ct to 1ht. t-..- u nt "'Y k ltl-!<-.1~~
~ndom HQ\t~.l~
~ o1 ......, 01 01...,. ~ ~
-- - -- - - - ---
J
I
~
Nvn.t "'
---
5E~i0
.lll l HCMUH5
H-~ r$1100"J~ ~ .
CortKicate [
20 I East 50th Street
wUiba
I ~tlijP Y - - .. -~-_.-..._.mailed In
envelope
10
{ 0 AUthor
nl
o yonc ..,.
ofr~ work tdt.'ntlfk'd an ths-s ., ppf&fat:on .and th.at the Sl.aMn.'f' t~ nud~
window
----- ----------
(Jf.lW.nt"f
CATE TO
7
8 1
10022
&AAIL
CERTfr:t.
Now YOrk. NY
t- -
--- -
10022
t 1 US C. !4o). Any per.tan no ~ mJ.'w:s 4 t.-sc rcl)fHen".ol'~ 011 ., no.atcn.11 r.w .n r,. .agpliealietl lct CllPfl'lgl'.t ~abet!~ lot by Sl!diOn 409. Olf'l &rrt WTdJen ~.11MIIfll lltee n ~
WCI'I t110 ~!1011. ~ be ~not~rorelr\lft 52~
NY J993--400,000
(i)
" US GO'IER.M.IENT P
APX289
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
<
'.!'
~,.
.I
~.
'
I
t
'
'
'.
t'
'~
&
'
'
~-----....
:
I
'
I,.'
......--
.t'... .,....,...,~
.,'"'b"~.o~..a.v.A.
.Lt.~.&..a.J. .&.LL&'-'~
A.I.J.UL'-'.1.~
'-'AUW1..1.j
USCA Case
#14-5327
Filed: 04/30/2015
294typed
of 437letters.
2. The typed letters from Johanna's
form
are coloredDocument
red so as #1550250
to more clearly distinguish
them from Page
Obama's
3. First note that the words on both forms are randomly placed, as opposed to the normal typing procedure of pulling the carriage return
fully to the left and beginning to type at the left margin.
4. This random style of typing has not yet been seen on any other birth certificate from the 1961 era in Honolulu.
5. It would be unnecessary extra work to hit the space key as many as 21 times to cause the indents from the left margin as we see with these
two documents. The difference is that these two documents were not typed, but pasted up, so exactly where they were pasted involved no
extra \Vork for the forger.
6. It should be noted that in 15 of the beginning-of-word locations for the typed letters on the form, we see a similar starting position that is
less than one character different, so they have been each been identified and numbered.
7. If all those starting positions were aligned left as normal, and a tab bar was used for alignment matches on the indented boxes, we could
expect to see such similarities in position. But when the typed lines are randomly placed, but still aligned in agreement, we can assume
these 15 similar matching lines are statistically impossible.
8. Since these two documents are otherwise proven forgeries, we are forced to assume that the same forger created both documents and
applied the same word placement style to both.
9. Also since it is evident that Johanna's parents were both born in Honolulu, we must ask why wouldn't Johanna have a legal birth certificate
already in existence?
10. We assume that she does have an authentic birth certificate, and simply made this forgery for herself, changed the birth certificate
number, and then personally gave it to Jerry Corsi in order to convince him that his theory of the birth dates matching the birth certificate
-
numbers was wrong.
-
11. However the fact that the birth certificate for Johanna Ah'nee, now in our (Arpaio's) possession, has an authentic raised seal, and is
printed on authentic green security paper, indicates that the Honolulu Dept. of Health is implicated as most likely helping to authenticate this
forgery effort.
12. Beside this striking similarity between the two documents, we also have discovered that both birth certificates exhibit the fault of
irregular letter spacing in addition to irregular line spacing. These are two additional matching discrepancies that prove the forgery of both
birth certificates. In addition there are letters on both documents that are found to be both bent and straight providing another proof of
forgery. All leading us to the conclusion that the matching mistakes lead to one forger.
APX291
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY: 1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
101 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION
TO SEAL AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES
Exhibit 24
APX292
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Af~
at
II
Dayof s~l
,20-,
PRESENT:
HON. DAViD I. scHMIJ)T,
Justice.
X
------------------P1amtiff,
-against-
-----------
.. .
. X
. Papers Numb~red
Notice of Motiori/Ord~r to Show Cause/
Petition/Cross Motion and Affidavits
(A:ffinnations) Anne~ed._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _,___ _ __
Opposmg Affidavits (.Affir~~:tions)._ _ _ _ - , - - - - - - Reply Affidavits (~tions)_ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - -
_ _ _ _ _ (Affumation.s)_ _-'----'--
.-.
;;J/c&vN~ci- .~rc;we1} k(LZifi/t:~t--'ft.. FS6l ..
ti.i..b~llO;\Jj
de:f~lilted m appeanng tooay. Instead of
entering a defali1tjudgment and ordering an niq~est, the court:m: itS discretion is -adjournillg tbi~. case
to .
~d-.\-(--_1 L/ ,:9::?0. ~Slipreme ~ourt County, A~ Street, Roo:n;r-S41,
Brooklyn, New York; pho:q.e ;num~er (347) 296-1584. .
Defendant
f./
36o
In i;he event defe~~t defaults ':m appe~g that day, ~ defau).t will be ente:r:ed and an-:inquest
A copy of this order shall be served on the ~efaulting party ~thin 10 days by .regul~ mail.
A copy o f the affidavit of s~rvice shall b_e brought to the next appearance.
EN.TER
1. s.c.
APX298
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Page
297 of 437
~cets!or lr;c NYc lOOts
www.b4Ambe1'g..ccm
NOTE OF ISSUE
=. .
-~_'?..!..~- ...-...
Court,
A~_?_:_f}~l5::....off:....P..fIIIJOnlod
..~~~-5...
N;ama
J~
.....J
0 Of all issues
~ Or attached hereto
~ Trial without jury
.......
Plaintifft.s)
agamst
f3t 4l'to
WJ4(... 7f:1'l.
oen:t.
Tort
u.Jfi4Gff1. c:HtUSTifVE. C.
.....,/ fJJHUNAI vo~~
.S"co-fT j./lt,F'~r 'fM!l.(b ~~ Alf~ MR~tre
~ "''
~.9~
IHORtt,Lr; ..
0
0
0 Contract
0 Contested matrimonial
0 Uncontested matrimonial
0 Tax certiorari
0 Condemnation
A1i
$1 Other (not itemized above) specify ..!1ff1..P.t!!Y..~.!.. ...It!.~.-~(!}:E.1..".-.
~..!.i~.~ .~-~.L~~~ ... A1.T.9.=..tttU).....~.!.'P.:L!F.!.!.~fSJ.7S.._Il ID.P- .
Defendam(s)
- .
- -- - -
~n .~----~---------- ..-
'C1'
ru
C:.
'::3
01 ort
(l"(
~
'........
APX294
Phom No.:
"'"
G:l
~--;:-
Nil'l
Phone No.:
2. rL '-ftlq
'1~'-f~
'-'
ru~
c:s.t
(3)
-i
NOTE: Clerk wiD not accept this note of Issue unless accompanied by a certificate of readiness.
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
N. I. 6etved
on
~----+ .........
-----
V'
6. Compliance with the Rules in mab:imonial actio rut {22 NYCRR 202..16)
7. Discovery proceedings now known to be necessary complem<J_ __
8. There are no outstand~ requeats for discovery.
9. There has been a reaBona.ble opportunity to complete the foregoing proceedings.
10. There has been compliance with any order issued pursuant tC? the Precalcndar Rules (22 NYCRR 202.12).
11. If a medical malpractice action, there h.u been compliance with any order issued pumta:nt to 22 NYCRR 202.56.
12. The ease is ready for triaL
a.:
S'
That on the
day of
depaneot eened the within note of issue and certllicate of
r~on
<>.
Admission of Service
CPS!
That on tho ~
day of .Dt;t:.Glt1tfL.YL ~ t'"'L
deponent ecned tho within note of lane and cutifieatc of
Due service of
DOle
~ }>IM1t:!JIJ7 J
CD
Uomer<>
t
tJ
....
e.
readlAea
At&omey(a)
herein, at the attorney's off~ aJ
1-f A&..l..
depoaeJ and NY.;
for
~J':Il#"l45t~a:fj~,w~
,..,.
tJTr:::T.) o/<4 AFFir>P I) IJF"" g(tltC._
of iasue
aod
admlttecl -------------
APX295
Attoruey(a) for..........---.. - - - - - - - - - -
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
FOR THE COUNTY OF KINGS
-----------------------------------------------------------------------X
Christopher-Earl : Strunk in esse
Petitioner,
-againstHakeem Jeffries, Grace Meng, Felix Ortiz, Bill DeBlasio,
Walter Cooper, Keith L.T. Wright, Christine C. Quinn,
William Thompson, Scott Stringer, Emily Giske,
Anne Marie Anzalone, Archie Spigner, George Gresham,
Ruben Diaz, Jr.; Ken Jenkins; Mario Cilento;
Gerald D. Jennings; Byron Brown ; Robert Duffy;
Joseph Morelle; Scott Adams ; Stephanie Miner; Steve Bellone;
Irene Stein; Sheila Comar; and Kirsten Gillibrand
PETITIONER'S
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
NOTE OF ISSUE WITH
CERTIFICATE OF READINESS
FOR TRIAL OF ISSUES AND
Respondents.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------X
STATE OF NEW YOR.T(
COUNTY OF KINGS
ss.
Accordingly, I, Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
To:
1. This is Petitioner's affidavit in support of his note of issue and certificate of readiness by CPLR 3402
for a trial of issues by December 14, 2012 with partial severance for the benefit of captioned Respondent
electors ofthe New York State Legislature's Electoral College and members of Congress before the deadline
to vote by December 17, 2012, and after January 3, 2013 for candidates for the office of President of the
United States, and that whether by casting a vote for Barack Obama each may be charged with the crime of
accessory after the fact of a felony committed on or about 25 April 2011 by persons as yet named, aided and
abetted by White House Counsel Bob Bauer, White House Press Secretary Jay Can1ey and Barack Obama who
during the 27 April 2012 White House Press Conference, see the transcript evidence herein (see Exhibit 1),
expressly presented a forged instrument to the People of the United States, a crime compounded by spoliation,
concealment, peijury, tampering with the public record, intimidation of witnesses and other crimes.
APX296
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
TRIAL OF THE FACTS
2. That Petitioner requires a trial of the facts of a crime before December 17, 2012 essential for the
proper execution of the Electoral College vote, say on December 13, 2012, and at which Petitioner will bring
only one expert witness for testimony by Typographer Graphics Expert Paul Edward Irey from Delray Beach
Florida to testify solely as to the nature of the forgery referenced above without determination of who the
perpetrators are per se, as that is a criminal matter for authorities with jurisdiction.
3. That expert testimony by Paul Edward Irey is based upon the Affidavit with Exhibits A through D
affirmed December 4, 2012, and herewith (see Exhibit 2) that is res ipso loquitur.
4. Petitioner contends that the body of the crime complained of has been brought to the attention of
Respondents and various district attorneys with authority and jurisdiction to further investigate, and that the
testimony deals with the fact that in 1961, well before computers or such other technologies that may be in use
today, that ANY birth certificate paperwork was done either by hand and or on forms designed for use with the
mechanical typewriter technology that was then widely used, rendering a forgery detectible; and that testimony
presents the proof of forgery in the context of then mechanical technology in use, and also to prove the forged
instrument is of current manufacturer, that the forgers use of the Unsharp Mask software by Adobe to create a
Halo around lettering thus also sets the chain of custody of the forgery along with where it was manufactured.
5. That Respondent public officers as if Elector Public Officers and private US Citizens have duty as to
matters of law and facts and when in violation of law must be held accountable or would infringe the trust due
the People of New York as similarly to Petitioner's right to suffrage, republican form of government, Freedom
and Liberty, any elelctor who would commit a crimne by adiding and abbetting a felony is incompatibkle. as to
New York State law as applies to the public officer oath, duties and obligation with use of NYS Civil Service
Law 1OSA and is to be barred as a person holding an office of trust or profit under the United States.
6. That it is a well-settled common law rule that a public officer cannot hold two incompatible offices
simultaneously (Matter ofSmith v Dillon, 267 App. Div. 39, 43 [1943]). This rule seeks to prevent offices of
public trust from accumulating in a single individual. Two offices are incompatible if one is subordinate to the
other or there is an inherent inconsistency between the two offices (see People ex rei. Ryan v Green, 58 NY
APX297
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries ct al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
295,304-05 [18741; O'lvfalie-y v A!acejka, 44 NY2d 530,535 [19781; Matter of Dupras v Courtty of Clinton.
213 AD2d 952,953 [1995]; AfatterofDykeman v Symonds, 54 AD2d 159. 162 [1976]; Fauci v Lee, 38 Misc.
2d 564567 [1963], ajfd. 19 AD1d 177 [1963]).
7.
That dunl office holders that have an incompatibility "has been said to exist when there is a built~in
right of the holder of one position to interfere with that of the other ..... (0 'Malley, 44 NY2d at 535). Where
one person holds both such posts then "the design that one act as a check on the other would be frustrated" .
8. The trial of the issues as a matter of public interest is brought by the Article 78 petition filed
November 14 2012 that was served upon the members of the New York State legislature's Electoral College
body by certified mail with a return receipt request on November 14,2012 and then by follow-up regular mail
on November 30, 2012 (see Exhibit 3); and that the issues were joined by the purchase of an Rll on
November 161 2012 (see Exhibit 4) and appearance of Petitioner and the New York state attorney general
office's Assistant Attemey General Jeshea Pepper of the Litigation B\ireau before tb@ Hoa. David I. Sehmidt
who for reasons explains in his order (see Exhibit$) thereafter declined to sign the order to show cause
application, and that Petitioner theu requested reconsideration on November 30, 2012 with due notice given to
the Hon. Arthur M. Schack J.S.C. for reconsidemtion pending see http:llwww.scribd.comldoc/112747771~
Wherefore, Petitioner wishes the Court to expedite this application for a trial of the facts to serve the
Electors with the facts that go to the PetitiQP for relief including declaratory judgments partially severed that
depend upon this trial and expert testimony, and along with other and different relief for justice herein; as the
same is true to my own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and
belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon
information and belief are as follows: 3nt parties, books~ and ~oal ~
Sworn to before me
This ~d.1y of December 2012
~er-Earl: Strunk
KAMAL P. SONI
.
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 01 S06089949
Qualified in Kings County
c ommisston Expires March 31,2015
APX298
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit 1
APX299
USCA Case
#14-5327
Document #1550250
hup:/lwww.whiiA:lmt;c.b'"'/Ur-prcss-nDu'i'./2011/IJ.l/27/prcs.-ll"fSic-prcss-sccrctnry-joy-com:
..
Filed: 04/30/2015
Whal was really doninallng a lot of discussion was lhls fake controversy, essentially, a sideshow, lhal was
dlslractlno lrom lhls roallssua. Mel an example ollhal would be when major Democrats and Republicans went onto
malnsltoam news organlzalions 1o lalk aboullholr budgal plans - Including tho Presldont-lhay ware aGked about
lhls. Thay were osl<ed about whal they lhoughl aboullhe c:onlrOvorsy. They wore ask9d illhey believed the
Prasldenl was born In the Uniled States. Mel k was rody a d!slracllon.
(ull'.m-1d{pl;ll.,
That roally slruck tho Prosldont, lod him lo ask his counsello look lnlo whathar we could ask lho stato ol Hawaii
to r..,aso tho long~otm cartlllcala, which Ia notoomothlng thoy gonorally do. Md ho did thai dospltatholiiCI thai k
probably wu not in hia tong.lerm- k would havo boon In hia- probably In his longlonn pollllcalintorvsla lo alow
lhia birther debate to doninato dlocusaion In tho Republcan Party lot months to come. But he thought evan though
It might have been good politics, he thought It waa bad lot the country. And so he asked counsollo look Into 11111.
20L'".J \II
And now Ill have Bob &'l'laln lhal. and then we'l take your ques11onsFor~&leReleaso
MA. CARNEY: ljuat want to- sorry. lmeanl to mention allhoiOp, as some ol you may have soon.lhe
Prosldonl wiH bo comng to tho briefing room at9:45 Lm., making a brief statement aboullhls- not tailing
queshons, bul just wanted to lei you know.
April27, 2011
MR. PFEIFFER: And ha wtfl uselhls aa an opportunlly 1o rraka a largar polnl about whal this dabato says about
ourpolrtlca.
Go ahoad, Bob.
MR. BAUER: Early last woak tho decision was mode to review the legal baSis lor secldng a waiver lrotn the
longstanding prohibition In tho state Depanmont ol Hoalth on roloaslng tholong-lonn birth corllllcato. And so we
undonook a legal analysis and dOiar- a waiver roquost could be modo that we had the grounds upon which to
II ld II ! ~
-6 ~ ~t~r- ~.i ~
\~
:. ..
~ ~~-
'<1 ..
'
FEFFER: Thanka, Jay. What you have In lronl ol you now Is a packel ol papers lhallncludas the
'along-lonn birth cenlllcale from the slalo ol Hawaii, tho ot1glf1ai birth certlllcale that tho Prnldont
ed and we pooled onWno In 2008. and then the corroapondonco belween tho Prnldant'a counaal and lha
tale Dopartmonl ol Haafth thai led 10 lho release ollhose documents.
Pre
roqu
Ha
to pnvato counool to the Prellldont and asl<ed her 1o contact lhe Stale
Department ol Hoallh and lo have a convortaiJOo aboul any reqUifomonts. lurthet roqulfemonla, lhat they lhought
we had lo aalisly 10 lodge lhal waiver requ011. She had thai convorsalion wkh the alate Deportment ol Health on
Thursday -counsel in qu01llon is Judy Cotloy allhe law lirm ol Perkins Coie, and you have a copy ollholeUer sha
subsequondy 110nt to the departmont wkh the Prnldont's wr~len roquesL
would jusl glva me a minulo to -lnWigo me a second lo walk lhrough a Ntllo al tho history horo, slnca ol
ron, around In 2008 when we orlg nally released lho Prosldenl's birth corllflcale, I wiM do lhal. Md then
or wll walk lhrough the 'molina ol how we acquired thaoo -umonta.
ol
Bob
Tho department oulllned tho requirements lor lho Prelldonllo make lhis requaot. He signed a loner making thai
roquost on Friday afternoon upon returning lrom lho Weal Coast And priVale counaol lorwarded his written roquosl
-writlen, IIQned request - along whh a laUor kom counsel. lo tho s1a1e Depor1monl ol Heakh on Friday.
of 15
I '!II t''
makathat"""""'-
~"..nd1
Saan:h Whiii!Houso.gov
2008, In response to media Inquiries, tho Presidents campolgn requeslad hi birth cortlflcllo from tho state of
C<~ll Wllh
CMilanS.
J.Wch 11 , 2012800NdEOT
311112012 11:00 p
The dapartmenl, as I undOrt"<>d M, ellor revlowlng lholaw and reviewing tho grounds asserted In tho roquesl,
came to lha conclusion lhat a w.tver could be appropriately granled. Wo were advised lhat lha tong.lorm blrlh
cor111lca1o could be coped and made available to ua as early as Monday. Ppli25th- the day belote yesterday. And
we made arrangements fat counsel to lreval to Honokdu 1o pock 11 up and il was returned to lho While House
yesterday altomoon.
?<
~
c
c
We received thai doc:umonl: we posted II on lho wobsbe. Thai document was lhon Inspected by
lantlact chockerl. who came 1o tho Clf11>algn headquarter and lnspiiCied lho document- Independent
ockarl did, and daclarad thai ft wu proal poslllvolhat lhe Prnldent was born In Hawaii.
Tt be clear, lho documonl we presented on the PresidGnt's webslleln 2008 Is his birth cortlllcale. lis the piece
ol DOI!er thai ovory HawaDan receives when they contacltho stato lo request a birth cortiflcalo. ~ Ia the birth
t they take 1o the Department ol Molot 1/ohldoa ta got tholr driver's llconse and thai lhoy laka lo lhe federal
ntlo gollhelr pauport_ UIs lhe legally rvcognlzad -umont.
Lot rna llfl1>hallza again, thoro Ia a spoclllc llatute thai govorm accoss to and Inspection olvllal records In the
slalo ol Hawaii. The birth certlllcatolhat we pooled online Ia, In facl. and always haa boon, and remains, lholegal
birth cortlllcalo ollhe Prealdont thai would bo used lot dlogal purpocoa lhat any rolldont ol Hawaii would wanlla
use a birth cortillcalo lot.
Thot euentlally - lor thole ol you who lollowed tho ClrT!lalgn closely know lhal solved the Issue. We dldn'l
any Umo talking aboullhls aher lhaL Thoro may hevo been some vory lrlnge discussion oulthore. but as a
However, thoro Is legal aulhortly In the dapar1mont to make o>a:apllons lo tho ganerol policy on not raloaslng the
tong.lorm birth cmlllcale. Tho policy In quealion, by the way, on norHelease has boon In affect since the
mid-1980s, I undorlland. So whlo I cannallol you whatlhe entire hlslory o1 oJICGpllons has been, k Is a limited
one. This Ia ono ol vory low that I undortland have boon granted for lhe r011ons aot oulln prlvale counsors lollor.
When you poaled IIlia did you posl the other 01da al h wherelhe slgnalure Is?
A. PFEFFER: We pooled both sld01 and whon II waalool<ed alit was looked al by -lhelaa chackars came
10 he~anora and actualy exarrined lho document we had.
MR. PFEIFFER: Yes. Tho second pagolhera Ia the one lhal was posted on lho tllarnoL
That oelllad the lasue. h recent woeka, lha Issue hu risen again as aame Iaika have begun raising a question
the original- about lholong-lorm birth certlllcalo you now have In lront ol yoy. And Bob wlla~ln whyrdlnary slapa we had to taka to racolva lhal and the legal roalmlnlllhal are In place there.
Okay.
MR. PFEIFFER: And lhello 1 copy ollhe one thai hal been kapt &llho HawaJI Department ol Health.
Fa...-
YoulUbe
1Wiltor
Ylmeo
Rlcllr
llllrla
Ooogle+
Unkadln
I ft became an Issue again. And Uwontlo - essentially the discussion lranscended lrom lho nOihor regions ol
0 Okay. And lhlllslhe one the I would be referred to- that people have boon asking lor !halls the birth
cortlllcate?
omet Into mainstream pollllcal dobalaln this counlty. I becamo something that when both Ropubllcans and
Cfats wore taldng lo tho media they were asked abouL I was a constant discussion on mainstream nowa
ilzallona. And tho Prosidenl believed thai h was becoming a diSiracllon lrom lhe major lsauas ware having In
ntry.
MR. PFEIFFER: They are both- the oecond one 111ho birth corUIIcato. The one on tho top Ia what II ratorred
lo as the long-lorm birth cert1ra10. /'a you can see - and Bob can walk you thrOUgh il - h contains some addiWonal
lnlotmallon that Ia not on the oecond page, which wu lhe birth corUIIcata which was reloased during tho caff\?&lgn.
he was particularly a~uck by tho fact that right ahor lho RopiA>IIcanl raleasod lhel< budgetlramoworl< and
lhe Ptesldont releesad his. we were prepared to have a very in1X>rtant. very vigorous debate In this counlfY about
tho r.!wre 01 the country. the dlrocllon wo'ro going to laka, how we're doing 1o doal wilh very 1"1l0f((lnt Issues Nka
don. Medicare. how we're going to doal with tii)CIIs In this country. Md thai should --lhat'a the debale we
be having yol.
of IS
31111201211:00Pt.
of IS
31111201211 :00P:
MR. PFEIFFER: There wil always be some selection of people who wil believe something, and thai's not the
luue. Thelssuols111al lhls Is not a discussion thalia just happening armng oonsplracy 1118Q(isls. happening
hare In lhla room; It's happening on al oflhe neiWOI1<s. Melli's something thai, as I said, every l!lljo< politlcalligure
ol both parties who's actually outtry~ng to lall< about raallasuea is asked eboullhla by the media. Mel 10 the
President decided to release lhls. Mcil1lleave lito others to decide whether 111ere'a sbl -there wil be some who
llil have a dilterenl- have a conopiracy aboullhis.
You've gof two corllflod COjllea, according to lhla study. You havo these physical-
Document #1550250
So the long lorm. which Is a cortlllcale, has rmre Information, butlha short fonn has the Information thai's logaly
suttlclent for all tho relevant putpOsoa.
sta~?
I don't think this draggod on lor lour yoaro because this was a resolved - for those ol you who rolnlrrbor tho
carrpaign, \his Issue was resolved in 2008. And ij has not been an lsauo, none ol you have asked about t~ calod
about n. reporlod on k unllllhalast low woe1<a.
Mel as I said earliar. II probably would have bean - a lot ollhe pun<f.ta out there have talked eboullho tact thai
thiS whole brther debate has been realy bed lor the Republican Party and would probably be good for the
Proaidanl polilicaly. Bul despill lhal lha Prasidanl, u I said, was 1\ruc:i< by how thts wa& crowding out the debate,
3/1112012 11:00 P~
ofl5
liijl://www.whitebouse.govlillC-press-officC/20!1104/27/pn:ss-gall!lle-press-sccrctary-joy-conr..
a So I guou tho impllcallon 11 tltal you did get political advantage by having not released this unUIIodey, ovar
lha eotne otlhe last lour yoars?
MR. PFEFFER: Thora hu bean- no onolhall can rtcallactuaNy asked ua to- we - asked to release the
President's birth cartilicala In 2008. We did thaL Mel than no one-" never- up unt a law weel<a ago, there was
never on lasuo about lhatlhal woan'ttho birth certUicalo lrorn ony credible Individual or lnldia oudol And it hasn't
been unlll-lrraan, Jay wu uked aboullhla yesterday
MR. PFEFFER: k's not lor"" 10 aay why ITDinatreammedia O<Qanizalions began 10 cover th<a debate. They'l
have lo answer that lor themselvn .
How concomll<l wore you about running against Donald Trump In a gonoral etocllon?
Q
1-6
hltp:l/www.whitc:IIOii<<.gov/ilii-pres-oUJcc/2011704127/presS-galldcpres-secrctaryJY-<=am:..
Mel 10 !hat's why ho rrade this decision now. bocauso II became an Issue that ~anscendod sort of this - II
essentially wu something lhal wu talked about. as t said. trom tho nelhor regions ol tlto lnlorn.t oniO mainstream
natwor11 newscasts. In tact, Jay has baen asked aboullhls Just yesterday In this room
a Not to give Donlld Trurrp more publlclty than he has, but Is he the parson who sort of- 10~ ol that bridge
belwoen what you're callng a ~lllgO and the ITDinl\roam? Do you think lhal ho'slllo reason why U.alripped the
switeh 10 a level whore you now havaiO deal wHh something you lhoughl was deaH wl1h7
parllcutarly around lha buclgot, on frr!lorlanlluuoa, and waa an "'""~'!'Ia ol tlta sort of oldashowa thai our poiHicl
locuaea on lnalaad of lha real chalangos thai we have to confront as a country.
l's not Just a sldoahow lor him; H's a sideshow lor our enUre poillics thol have becorno focused on this.
3/111201211 :00 p
ofl5
~uG:tut
Anclao thoro hasn't been a dlocuulon lboullhla other document lor years. l'a only bean In lholastlew wool<l.
Mel so 10 your second quoallon, tho Prealdanl dodded to do lhll and ho'llal< about this when he gets hera decided to do H altha llmallnathal Bcb laid out bacauaa it wu a - thla was a sidashow lhal wu distracting from
the real challenges thai we're ladng.
<:>
MR. PFEIFFER: Lei's be very dear. You were there lor tho ~lgn. Thoro was novor a queaUon about tha
original birth certllicaiO during lhe c""""lgn. I was a sOI\Iod lssuo. I was thare lor the original decision lo relooao
lho birth certlfalo. I was there when we posted II onlna. lm not sural oven knew !here was an original onolhal
was dlnorent lhan tho one we posted onNne because Hwasn't an Issue. So II wasn't Hka -lei's be vary clear. We
were asked lor tho President's ~h cerllllcateln 2008; we released lho President's birth cerllllcale; and It was
done. That WBI it.
a Old tho President change his own rrlnd aboullhis7 In other words, was he advocaUng during the CBITjl4IOn
lei's just put II out there and got II over with, or was this an lnta<nal shift In thinking based -In other words, wu it
the Prosidenl who steadlasdy during lhe ca~ said this Is rid<culous, I don' waniiO give lhll any rmre ground,
end has now changed his rrind? Or <llhlslhe-
a Bob. can you o>q>laln why Prosidont Obarra let this drag on lor tour yoers?
MR. PFEIFFER: The Presidonl-lhls In HseH- when you hoar the Prosldonlllhink youll understand the point
he's making, Thai wil be in noiiDO long,
>
Filed: 04/30/2015
Tho cora lnlormaUon thai's required lor logal purposes and \halls putlnlo the actual cortlllcaUon thai's a
co~IOr1)8noratad docurranl, which we posted In 2008. thaliniOtmatlon Is abstracted, II you wtl, tram lho original
birth cortlllca\a, put into the COfl1lUIO!Wld shorHormcertii!Utlon, and made available to Hawai an roaldonta Dlthalr
request.
MR. BAUER: Tharo's a diHorence belwoen a cerllfocate and a cerllllcalion. The certlllcatlon Is llfl'llly a
varlllcallon ol ce~aln Information that's in the Otlglnal birth certUicale. Tho bltth certilicale, as you can aoe, has
signatures altha bonorn from lhe anondng physician. tho local registrar. who esaenlialy overseeothe malntanance
altha records. contains some additlonallnlormatlon also - !halls to soy, the ong01al birth cartifocala - II contain
some addhlonallntormatlon like the ages of the parents, bl~hplllces, residence, street address, lhe name olthe
hoapi1IL
Whan you say lhat, you rreon cer11fiC8tlon- you released the cortlllcaUon?
MR. PFEFFER: When any Hawaiian wantS- roquosts their birth cortlllcato because they wantiO got a driver's
lcense. thoy want 10 got a passport, they do o>racdy what tho President did In 2008. And that'a whatlhatls. Mel we
released lhal Mel \hare what any Hawaiian would do to r"'- their birth cortlllca\o. Mel that was good enough
for everyone un\11 very rectndy thla became a quosdon again. Anclao the President madolhls decl&lon. He'l WI 10
you more about hi1 thinking on that.
Can you addraos lha reports ol Pelreaus 10 the CIA and DOD-
a Ancllhllls going 10 sound - I moan, you can Just anticipate what paople are going to - rorraln
unconvlocod. Tltoy'ra going 10 say that thla Is Just a pho:ocopy ol a piece ol paper, you could have typed anything
In there. v.11111o actual certlllcato be on display or viewable at ony - (laug/JIOr.J
Q Dan. was there a debalo about Whether or nollhls desorvod being discussed by tho White House, whether
or not - and lm going back to the bl~h certillcate. I lose points, I understand. B<Jt wu thoro debate about whether
or no\ lhls was worthy ollho Whlo Houso 7
a
MR. PFEIFFER: The point ld makolalhal we weren' tho ones who- we're not tho tnt ones to bring this up In
thoa room. Jay hu been asked ques11011a aboullhls; tho President has been asked about UIn lnldla lntorviowl.
Mel 10 that wasn't a dOCI&Ion thl!l we madt, end the Prasidonl made tho decision 10 do this and he mads the
decision 10- and when he cornea down horolhls morning ho11alk to you about why he thinks !hero's on l~rtant
polniiO be made hera.
MR. BAUER: Mel you'l see lha lenar tram tha dlractor altha HeaHh 00par1mentlhatstates thai sha oversaw
tho copy and Is anesUng to -
a Genlng back to tho personnel announcements, does the President understand that thaao onnouncemanta
have been made and oourcod elllislactorlly for moot news Otgonlzatlons belore he spoai<l up and he's not letting hts
ofl5
MR. PFEFFER: He wll not. and I will not leave K hero lor him to do so. But Uwll- the State Drlpart~n~nt of
Health In Hawaij will obviously eQaalthallhal Is a- whallhay have on IH.. A5 Bcb aald. K'aln a book In Hawaii.
3111120121l :OOPII!
hofl5
3/ll/20121l:OOPM
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
li:WhilC-House
twp://www.whl~<:lxn,;c.goilho-prcs-othCC/2UIIIIJ.I/27/prcs-g;>~c:-prcs:;-sccr<tory-JY-clliTIO ..
Just qolddy, bock on lho blt1h c:ortlflcalo, yesloroay you said this was a settled Issue. So-
aI
MR. CARNEY: Wei, as Don said, again, it haa been a aenled 1stu0.
MR. PFEIFFER: From a factual polnl of vlow, It's absoluloly a solllod losua. Bullholacllhalll was a aellled
lasuo dd 1101 koop lllrom bocomng a major pall oflho polllk:al disc:u51101l In lhla lown lor lho lasl aeYO<ai weeks
here. So there's abl<llulefy no ques1Jon that whalthe President released In 2008 was his birth ter1111<:alo and
answered that que Ilion, ard mony of your O<ganlzallona have done eiCelenl ropolllng which PfOYed lhallo be tho
c:aae. But k conUnuad: the Preslllenllhoughlll wao a sideshow and chose 10 lakalhis llop loday lor tho roasona
Bob laid out.
I rrean, ths 11 such BS. l's al oullhere ard you guys are - okay, lhe Prosldenlfs g01ng to talk aboutlhls
so we c:an' say any1tong.
1.4~. CARNEY:
BUI, you'ro lreo Ia mako phono calla ovorywhoro you c:an. rm lust say1ng that we don1 have a
a Aside from tho policy dls~acllons thai was presonlod, did you have sorre concom bocauso II was sort of
roaching back Into lho rralnatraam nowa COV0<8QB lhat lhis could bocomo a lador In tho 2012 election wilh c:anlrl&l
valera?
Jay, yostarday you ~ad oboullail&afoltlgoors as son of a positive anornallva lo sperding culs. rm
word ring Htho While House has any oponn011 1o lnclud ng tha~ beceuse U's a While House propo;al, lndudlng
lhal any legWallon lhal would raise lha debt coiling llnit.
CARN Y: Wol, what wo'lle seld vary c:leBrty, and I think Secr01BtY Geilhner said It oioquently yesterday, II
ofOUI, risky Idea 1o hold hostage any other- hold hostage, rather, raising lhe dabl c:aiing, a vole on
the debt c:olling,lo any olhor piec:a oflogfslallon. Tho cormilmont this Prosidonl has to moving aggressively
loWII sa COIJll!Ohenslvo dellcll roducllon plan Is cloar. I will be c:lear again whon tho \leo Prosldont convonos a
bipartiaan, blcamorai meoUng, noll! wook. hld ho hopoolhal progross wll be mode on lhol very quickly.
f.
iE
Is a
rals
MR. PFEIFFER: This Ia tho -lho Ioiiar llrol and lhelwo cortlnad coploa -lhlsls one of lhose . Thlslatho sarre
thing you have a copy of aalhe llrst page of your pad<ol.
Lastnlghl?
we're conlldonl, remarn conlldenl,lhallhe loaders of bolh parties in Congress, as well as the President, w~i
ilh lhe Prooldont. .. I have said many Umeo. lhol we do 1101 havo an akernatlve lo raiaing tho debt coiling
e, as many hove said. outside observers, econorrists end buolnoumen and WO<OOn, the imped oflhat would
iloUSIIbesl.
WhottirNt?
a I So avon though fl'a your own proposal thai you guys endorsed you don'l wanllo sea II as pall oflho linal
1 ort~
311112012 11 :00 p~
tclio!J;c
727/prcn-g;~gglc:-prcss-sa:rcuuy-joy-clliTIO ..
rm
M CARNEY:
not negotiating lrdlvldual piOilBS of a package lhal we hope Rapubllcano and DerTilCtllls can
corre
or arourd from this podium. But again, we beleve fl's esaenUallo - the Presldenl believes -lhara one
oflhe easons why we're doing this rlghl now - we boliove lha11heso are big deboleslhal need lo be had. They
can conlontlous, argumenlatlvo, serious, C0111>10honslvo, dolailod, bec:ausothoy'relrrportan1; they're all oboul
Amari 's luturo. At1d lhey'ro aboul v1s1ont of this country ard whore wo're going lhal neod to bo dobaled. At1d lhl
debal was being crowded out in mony ways by a sideshow.
>
~
=
~
MR. PFEIFFER: Whalovor limo you rocolvod your guidance suggosHng thalli would bo "this IJma torrorrow
morning."
he looks forward to having a debate on lhe real Issues thai Americans want us Ia lalk aboul-long-term
c plano. dolldl roducllon, lnvestmanlaln tho klrda ol1htngs thai wll help lhls economy grow and create
allng with our onorgy needs, a long-term enorgy plan. Thoso aro ollssuos thai have been sldalrackad al
least lh lhe pub!~ debate by some of the Issues lhal wo're talking oboulthis morning.
Ala lhoseletlors supposed Ia demonsltalo lhe legal steps thai were Involved In reloasing lllo tho White
House counsel?
MR. BAUER: Tho lellerslhal you have, the personal requeottrom lhe President, along With lho occompan)'WlO
lellor ~om PfiYBIO counsel, io rrerely meanllo do<:umenllho legal path lo getllllQ tho waiver Of thai policy so we
could get lhe ~Jormc:ar1111C81o.
a1Ia there e concem that mo<e ard mo<e people were ac1ually stoning lo beieve Ill sideshow -I rrean,
flBOillt hae been askng oboul -
M~CARNEY: 1will let the Prealdenl speak lor himself, bot whal Dan was uylng ard llhlnk Ia in1>ortant Ia that
tho Is ue here Ia lhat tho President leelsthallhla was bad lor the counlry; lhat ll'a nor hoaMhy lor our pollllcal
dabal ' when we have so many IIT!)Ortlnlfuueo that Amoricana care aboul, lhat affeclthoir llvoa, lo be drawn Info
sldn
a oboulfolaclas 1hal have been dllproven with lho lui worghl ol a legal do<:umenlfor IIOYtlral yoora.
MR. BNJER: RIQIIL Tho non-release ofthelong-lormcor1fllcalo. which has been in ottectslncetho1860s- a
natural question would haVII been. - wha1 cld you do 1o obtain the waiver, and lhose totters rvprosent the
roqueol.
, again, as Dan said, ard a lot of political pundi1s have said, you could say lhal ~ would be good polllk:a,
sman poilllca, IO< lho Pnooldonllo lallhls play ouL He carH II'Cfe about whal'o good lor ll>o r:cuntry. Ho wanlalhe
He wanllthelocus on lho Issues thai Americana c:are about.
a Wol. ian'! ~ true lhal anybody who wu born In Hawaii can Whlelhis tenor? I mean, lhll's II thoro lola lho
walvorproc:ou?
debatt on thalaiUOI.
MR. BAUER: No. Lei mo justol!plain once again bocauae I also nolicod, by the way. in one repo" alroedy the
wrong cortihcale wu actualy polled on Ihe wobllle. Tho ter11riC&te with lhe signal urea altha boaom- and thai's a
key dllloronce betwoen lhe short '"""and lho long '"""-the long form hulignalures al1ho bollom from lho
anerding phyliclan, tho locel regillrar and tho molhor, Ia lhe original birth cet1Wic:ale, which sill in a bourd volume
In the Stale Department of Hoallh.
a1Jay,lha Prosldont yOS1orday said lhal he had boon talking to ollellportors about lnaeaslng output. Who
spocltjc.ly has he bean talking ARNEY: Wol, I seld -I want to clarify. I said several Umea I believe ~om lhro podum when aslcecl
quea
about our ovoral handing oltho looue of high gas p!icea lhel we've had convorsollona with ofl.producing
slat and alies ard lhose conversoilonl continue. I don1 have &pecilic "the Presldenl opolc.e with lhis leader or
ovemment ofticials spoke with others." bot those are ongoong conversations lhaL ol course, wo would be
lnasltuatlonfikelhiS.
The ahort frO<n Is a corr.,u~arlmd ab&lracl, ard lhal'slho legal birth certificate wo requested in 2008 and thai
Hawallana ara entitled 10. Since tha rric1- 1980s, the Sill a Dopanmenr of Heahll, lor adrrinlstraHve roosono, only
Pfovtdea Ia people who roquosllholr birth certiflc:alo tho short form They do nor p!OYido lhalong form.
a I Do you guy a have any commenl on 1ho NATO soldiers thai ware killod n AfghaniStan ard any confirmslion
So In order lor us to obtain the long form, wv had to hovo a walvor. We had Ia ac1ualy detormno lhallhore was
2ortS
ol nogollallng whallhel would look like, lthlnl< the nogollalO<S should do 1haL led by tho \Ice Presldeol,
and Democrats logolher. But again, ellpik:itly linking"' holding hostage the absolute necosslly of
ebt cellng to any other place oflogislallon and dec:lering that we111ank lho U.S. oconomy and perhaps
economy II we donl get lhla specilic lhlng thai we wanL 11hlnk Is a dangerous ard unprecedenled thing lo
Re
rals
the
do.
MR. PFEIFFER. flvl Bob said, II arnvad by plano- tho Prooidenl's peroonal counsel wont to Hawah ard brought
nbock and we OOIIIast nlghL
3/ll1201211 :00Piv'
toort s
3/lll2012li:OOP~
Document #1550250
a legal balls lor provfd111g U, and then ask them to e,.,rdsethelr authority to provode us woth the tong lorm The
steps required to accot11'flsh lhat were a lener lrorn the person wllh the direct and vilallnterest - the President- so
you have aloher from tho Prasidenl, and than there was an ac:corrpanylng teller from counsel basically loriTCIII~ng
the requ"'' So lho r11aoon we lndudod lhillla 1hat 1hosa wore legal IIepa we 100~ to obl;un lholo<'lllorm by way of
this waiver.
Filed: 04/30/2015
a Aquestion on 1he aituollon regarding the Defense of Marriage AcL YosiMday Altomoy General Eric Holder
rajec1od attacks on Paul Clement, who Is taldng up defense of tho slalule on behalf of lha U.S. House. Paul
Clerrent has Ioken a lot of heotlrorn the LGBT CCfM'lll1ity lor voluntaerlng to take up defense ot OOMA. Eric
Holder Hid, "Paul Clarrent Is a greotlawyer and has dono a lot ot
great things lor this nation. In laking on tha
rupresenlallon - representing Congress In coMec11on wllh DOMA. I think he Is doing that which lawyers do when
we're at our best. Thai critiCism I think was vary rrisplacod." IV>d Holder went on to COfJl>&fe tho crlllc:lsm ot
Clement to auac~ on tho Juatlce Doparlrnontlawyors lor their past tor dolalnoos at Guantanamo Bay. Doos the
Presldont share Eric Holder'a views on this?
'"""Y
MR. CARNEY: We do share Eric Holder's views on this. Wothlnk- as wo said lrom the beg:nnlng when we
talked about -when I did from this podium - about the doclslon no longer 11om the administration to doland the
Defense ot Marriage Act. lhtl we would support ellorls by Congress II they so chose to deland IL IV>d so Ihave
nothing to add to tho Attorney General's conrrents.
a Folowing Mondlsy's AIPak Shuation Room meeting, what lathe Pr11oldent'a assessment olthe sltuallon In
Alghanil1an end Pakistan? IV>d doOI ha think that July drawdown is atill on?
MR. CARNEY: The Presklonl'a policy, which Included lila beglmlng of alran<lon- beginning of a drawdown
ot Arnerlcen troopo, Is abeolutaly Bill on IriCk. I don't have anything additionally lrorn tho meeting yesterday beyond
what we've eakl, But the policy romalna aall was.
>
:IJofiS
3/llnol211 :00 PI
liijl:71Www:w~pn'illrpron:othC<721lll/041271pro ..gagglo-pron-=rctary-Joy-<:une ..
Q
~
Given lha corrmonta of the Paklstano official quoted In tho Wall Street Journal, is Paldllan still a U.S. aQr.
END
i14of IS
9:18A.M. EDT
3/111201211 :00PN
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit 2
APX304
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
)
) ss.
)
I, Paul Edward lrey, being duly sworn, depose and say underpenalty of
perjury:
1. I am over the age of 18 years old, am a resident of Florida located
at Delray Beach and have been previously accepted by the courts as an
expert witness and have testified as such expert to the information
contained in this affidavit is based on my personal knowledge and,
if called as a witness, I could testify completely thereto.
2. I have 57 years experience in graphics. first in serving with the U.S. Air
Force being trained as a clerk typist, two of those years with the
National Security Agency for which I had a Top Secret security
clearance during the years 1957 and 1958.
Page 1
APX305
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
8. The actual document I used for examination of the Obama birth certificate
is described in the following chain of evidence contained in Exhibit "B" ...
page 1 & 2 & 3 anneexed herewith, and
9. That shown as Exhibit "B" page 1 and 2 is the proof of purchase of a 14" x
16" reproduction print from Associated Press through their division called
"Replay Photos" that sells photographic items from their news service and
that shown as Exhibit "B" page 3 is a copy of that page purchased as a
true and accurate copy of what the ASSOCIATED Press acquired from the
White House at the news conference on the morning of 27 April 2011.
Page 2
APX306
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
ShO\\ n belo\\ is an enlarged section of the Obama long torm birth certificate that \\as released online at
'" hitehouse.go\ on 27 April 20 I I. No adn1ission has been made as to who actuall) scanned and con\erted this
to an Adobe Acrobat PDF file and posted it on the official White House"' ebsite. It is not kno\\ n if it\\ as
someone at the \Vhite House or someone at the Honolulu department of health that had pre\ iousl) pro\ ided
two copies of Obama's birth certificate that \\ere hand -carried from Ha\\aii to the White House.
The important feature to obsen e is that e\ en thing in black is outlined in \\hit e. This will be ret erred to as
"The \\ hite Halo".
The Honolulu dept. of health alleges that the procedure for making copies of birth certificates is to take the
binder \\'here the birth certificates are stored and open it up to the one the) cop), place it face do\\n on an
nrdimH) cop) machine and simpl) cop) the document to green securit) paper instead of white paper.
Given that this is the normal procedure, I see no reason for the white halo. I have seen many other birth
certificates from Honolulu in the year and a half that I have spend examining this issue of forger), and can
attest that none of those other birth certificates from Hawaii had a white halo.
If
Wa
let01
f Blrtha Otyt Town or Rural Loatloa
Honolulu
~i3;Me oi Mother: Clty. Towa o.. Rual tr:adetr
Honolulu
.d draa
6085
Kalanianaole Higl
page 3
APX307
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Paragraph 11
Shown below is what we should have seen if the birth certificate original form was
actualy copied to the green security paper and we would see no white halo. Copiers
do not print white, which is the only way white could be seen anywhere over this
green security paper. I was able to purchase this special paper on the internet. The
green color and hash marks are dye printed through to the other side. In other words
the paper is green on both sides and there is no white anywhere.
3.
Thi BJtth
Si
TwlnO
Honolulu
Ad drat
6085
fame ot
Kalanianaole High
Father
HUSSEIN
tACK
page 4
APX308
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Paragraph 12
To answer the question as to how the white halo happened, I show the example below.
On the left is a copy from the White House release. On the right is my example of a
computer created halo. I have put a white halo on paragraph 11 using the unsharp
mask filter found in Adobe Photoshop. The settings I used
are seen here to the right. As I see it, the forger made the
forgery on a computer, used a scan of the security paper
and included it in the file with the other elements of the
forgery. Then after flattening all the layers, applied the
unsharp mask filter to sharpen up the soft edges of the type.
The forgers serious mistake was to flatten the layers before
.
applying the sharpening filter. This filter that I have been
B
1o3x
G
using for 22 years chokes back the black edges and leaves
Amount: 500
white to create a sharper edge. You see it everywhere even
- ' pixels
Radius: 2.4
around the form type and rules. There is no other way in
graphics science to create the white halo seen on both
. levels
Threshold: 4S
documents below, the forgers and mine. Proof of forgery.
.;
~- -
APX309
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Paragraph 13
To view a closer and better look at the comparisons shown in paragraph 14 of the
deposition, see below still showing the original PDF released by the White House on the
left against my own example of a computer creation of the white halo seen on the right.
Thi
---
..,...
---
!! _ - >
~ Birth
Honolulu .
ta ;
ss-- ,.
..
azc::uz; _
m....
page 6
APX 310
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
The chain of evidence for the white halo IS proven with this enlarged section of the
Associated Press purchased print referred to in Exhibit liB 1 & 2" that came from the
Xerox copymade at the White House of one of the two originals sent from the Honolulu
Dept. of Health , according to the description made during the news conference at the
White House on 27 April 2012 . The White House black and white copier would have
normally dropped out the green security color background along with the white halo.
However I found that by darkening the background of the Associated Press copy, we
are still able to see reminents of the white halo . This shows us that the white halo must
also be on the original sent from the department of health in Honolulu. We now have
new evidence on this issue when a Los Angeles law firm requested that the Honolulu
Dept. of Health confirm that what is currantly downloaded from whitehouse .gov website
is thier document. See the next paragraph 15 of thts affidavit.
AW~II
CERTIFICATE OF LIVE I
lb.
(TJPe or prbat)
Middle Name
HUSSEIN
BARACK
Oahu
Honolulu
Sln*AddHU
OBAl~
irlbDial:'~
East Africa r
page 7
APX311
Student
Paragraph 15
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
The first picture at the bottom left is a section of the original PDF file released on
whitehouse.gov on 27 April 2012. It represents the color appearance we have been
looking at for 1 1/2 years. The middle picture at the bottom center is a section of the
document sent to the attorneys for the Mississippi Democratic Party in Taitz et al v.
Democratic Party of Mississippi No. 3:12-cv-00280-HWT-LRA (S.D. Miss.) See
attachment "C", the letter from the registrar of births for the
HUE/SATURATION FILTER
HPe/~tum.on
Edt
Muter
s..tur;atlon
-otc
(
+8
Hue
C;ancel
l o.ld ..
+80
-'"
s..w ...
+51
lightness
Colo ri ze
M Preview
LEVELS FILTER
Ch.tnnel
Cy;an
lnP<It Levels 36
l -42
2SS
the altered PDF file that we must assume came from Onaka.
The bottom right picture is my example to show the result of
Auto
Output leve ls 0
2SS
,.,
.1
the center photograph. These settings are seen in the 3 boxes --.;;..._ _ _ _ _ ___..liii-.-Pr..;;;.;e"'=ew......,
BLUR TOOL
History
SAME SECTION OF
ALTERED VERSION
--
Act1ons
Ope"
L!!ve s
~
~
Hu e : Satu ~t
on
Blur
SfATE OF HAWAII
BA!
S.. 11&11 I
iolani Mate1
page 8
APX312
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
-:::::----_\
___ MyCom~0~~::~29.2013
;/:!~~
Notary Public
page 9
APX313
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit A
APX314
Document
#1550250
EXH IBIT
." A"
Filed: 04/30/2015
" lhc !oUUI\."1: fur \lUI eAan'l. \Ve IC"<:llllilc lhat fi>n:n>ic
c.lncumcnt exammcr- shnulc.l be inmi\"C"tl in thts. Our poup
anemplc.J In mplu} orrr 115 of tile 1,000 ccntlic-J lurcnr
c.lno.'un1C."nl cumincr in Uti ~-.,unlry . All of them refusal h>
c..-rlhct h-1.: al nr llt~'' tilt" Ohama binh nlilit"alr.
Ex.:u~ SI\'CR Wl"rl.' ... ~1 .Jn "''"" fur lhc l!mcrnm.:m nr t
'"1'1"'" Obama." nr -1 mu.t \C."<." 111<. urigin.1l." U'c /rae
found tlris bir1l1 n-rtifit:tJJr tu he o badly donr furJ:CI')'.
Cnmp;ue 11~ typcwntcn Jtoti.:r.. cnlar;;cJ lnm IlK" binh c.-.:niliclo: \\._. h.m.- mari.:C'J
Ihe one- du~<.cn 1\ith ll blue""' undcr lhc nri.!_!tnallcUt"r or lhe IS p.str chn!oen. """ ....... i'
lmm lhc \\nrc.! '"Studrnt" thai ~.dtibll twn .Jiflcrcnttypc tylt"S of 1111." '"I"' \llrthm the 'an~
"\tllll llrC"-c UJ'P<II uur ,unlcnhun ll~:rllht" I)JlC\.1 leltct" "'""" cupr.-.1 ant.l "'\C."nrblcd
fwrnc.Jrffl-rcnlc.lncumcn" :'\ncc:thcIJe
rrd ~h~pc
o.lif(cu:rtco:....
The~ lcncr-
"'ulc.llllll
leiter Thisisproofofforguylwcansr
a a e e EE 66 ll
.AA II nn ss Ku
t t YY ; i K U;HU~;r:;,;;;rsS:::SIS;:;~E
,;.n'ltiuhinNIJ
g~: S S
nffiJrJ:uy.
'i/' lj'i..
1\(l"l!!ch:!l..c)tUd:lu~octhcr:mJ
CERTIFICAT,i OF LIVE
Jk,t.taER
(T)'pc: or print)
Bl~
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
61 1061:1..
151
lc.
Laa' Name
rl-~------~~B~A~R~A~CK_____aerr
__~~~~=e~~~=~~
-~SS~'El=-=N~l~-----=~----~0-B_AMA
__~~-~
I, I__~~~--:z. Sex
1:3. Thia Birth
,,4.
Twin or Triplet, ,,Sa.
Month
Dq
Year
JSb. Hour
llaJ.."e
Wu ChUd
A
t
4
If
r'V'
~ 7a.
Bam
ht0
Birth
l.'ll
- ""&.- ,...me
o(
lloapll al or lnatitutlon ( U
ot in ho llal or lnthutlon,
gi~e
-..,,..._..,.'",.......__._,.." -+r-...----,--o-
~alaru
25
13.
17e.
1s
7s.
Birthplace Cbl
Kaoiolani
Re.ide~~ee
on a Farm or Plantation?
No~
OBM1A
Raee of Falher
African
orcio--p-;Cooa.a-,-ry"">p
...:2a~.--=u..-n---:
a ai'"'Ou-::::--p-U..,.o-~ ------+.1~2b::-,-:-::Kln:-:--d~of::-:B:-Ill-:1-neu--o-r";'la-d..-u-ll~rJ----
Stud~~
14.
Wichita AanEasf---
~ale
Ja
YaO
or lllother
Ase of Motherl16.
Ye1~ N~O
.,_ _ __
9.
STANLEY
15.
Honolulu, Hawaii
Ia Raidmce Jnaide Oty or Town Limit.!
If
_!
Limit.~
7c.
Highway~
Oahu
Oahu
anaoJ!e
2
Wand
Ya ~ No 0
+--
60
. 85
1--+,.,..--:---~~~
'
;;;.
lat.ad
Honolu. u 4---
"
17b.
1961:;;...._.L..-.;?....;:..;..24~....;;P~oM
L:U.....
.
'
6b.
or
llloth_er
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Caucasi~
DUNHAM
117h.
None
The whrtc haln ...:t"n unthc nnlinc Whu.: Huu,.... rclca"-" is :r 11h11e uulline
antund e1enhin)! un the binh c.-.:rtilkah.> Nu nt.hcr binh .:enili..:ah: h:L' llu. Sc.""C II un E:duhu "A" bdu\\
& E"thtbit "ll" ~htl\\111!; h<.>W it ~huuld luuk. Thi~ wa' .:au-.cd hy the t\c.lubc Phutu~hup Iiller u ....'\ltn
'harpcn cdgc:o.. II c.lnc' thi~ by .:hol.:ing bad the C\l.!_!e lea\ing :1 white haht. We !ohuw in F~htbtl '"C"
huw we did the -.arne thin!! tu uur pcdmen example. The lf:twaii:r.n Ocpl. nf Health i uppu-.cd Cu ha1 e
pUt the nrigi~ binh L'Cnific:lle un a L~IJ'iCr and printed Ill a ,pc.:jaJ sn:cn \O:Unl)' paper jn,te;~oJ nf \\bile:
paper. The nnly rcult P<~iblc frnmlhat i~ E'hibil .. a. SOT c.\hibil-A" . The halu prme' that lhc
fnrt::cr ..-umbineJ ll ....-;m uf the ....~unt} p.rpc:r un .. ..-umpuler .. n.~ncncd .til uf the dement' in the rile .lllc.l
lhcn ;rpplied chc un,h:np l\lal. It ,, C\0:11 un Ihe hrrth ccnilk.IIC ......,c . -~'1: uppc:r left 1."\>rnCI . Smcc
Ihi~ i a c.lircct cupy uf the birth "CrtiiiL." .IIe "-"''l fnrn u~\\.111 tholl P""C' the \\hrtc h.rlu \\,~,on \\h.IJ
lhcy '"'JliCd. '"we rnut a~,um.: the.." llo~I\Jito~nunl!rnal h." it"'"' T!Ji~ i.1 Jtrt>oft~fforgrl')".
Ellhlblt C
uiiiv::eipity
Race
~r::::
appllf!d
~BARACK
-t, "BARACK . L~:, BARACK f-.
- ..,..,;~.
~
an
aI1 an
ol al n
i!CThUU;er ni ~ qn
i .c ~n er
. ni
. al~n
an
-=:-
Congress failing to investigate this forgery is neglecting their constitutional "Duty to Object'!
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit B
APX316
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Sent
ro: putnam@motionsystem.com
iubject: Replay Photos Order Shipped
20 11 9 : 38 AM
APX317
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Billing Information
Name:
Thomas Putnam
Company (Optional): Motion Systems
Card Type:
Card Number:
AM
xxxxxxxxxxx3099
Order Details
Quanti
mnltrans
Desert on
order 278149 expedited shipping
APX318
Unit Price
Subtotal
16 00
US Dollar Total
16.00
16.00
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Cblld'e fl u Namf'
lb.
(Type or print)
-DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
61 10641.
151
lc.
Middle Name
OBAMA, II
HUSSEIN
BARACK
If Twin or Triplet,
W aa Child Bom
ht 0
2nd0 3rd 0
Thia Birth
4.
Lut Name
Sa.
Birth
Date
Yeor
Day
Month
August
1961
Oahu
Honolulu
am~
6d.
R~ idence
or
~1other:
7b.
Yes~
NoD
7c.
lalaad
Oahu
Honolulu
Honolulu, Hawaii
Street Addreaa
Kalanianaole Highway
6085
No~
9.
HUSSEIN
BARACK
As e or Father
11.
25
Birthplac
{en,ya,
East Africa
African
OBM4A
12a.
Usual Oc:cupaUon
12b.
Student
14.
Race or Mother
Caucasian
DUNHAM
ANN
Birthplace (Island. Srart or
University
STANLEY
Race o Father
fortip~ Councf}
None
18
18b.
Mtd'!.~~
Oaher
AUG .a 8 1961
Evfcknce (or
~layed
Date of Slpature
,7~/
19a.
I hereby certify that thle child ~
waa bom altve on the date and
hour staled above.
23.
22.
_,
19b.
Date o( lpature
r; I ~I
1
J.lU L -
S J~6f
FiUns or Alteration
APR 2 5 2011
I
T.
0~, ~h.l>.
STA'( R'6GIS
APX319
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit C
APX320
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Department of Health
1250 Punchbowl Street
Honolulu, Hawau 96813
VERIFICATION OF BIRTH
Recipient of Verification:
The original Certificate of Live Birth for Barack Hussein Obama, II, is on file
with the State of Hawaii Department of Health.
2.
(_
A. . ,lt;;.'>t.:'t. '
'
c--..v;L<. . . 1
- "\
-, I
\'"'-....
~\ ..u.
I' .: ~
fVl\_,
APX321
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit D
APX322
http://us.mcl257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid=l2&filterBy=&...
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
YAHOOf MAIL
Classic
1051324...
1051324...
1051324 ...
Dear Paul,
I think you have proposed the most probable scenario based on the creation and file dates of the
associated court documents.
1. The paper copy of the Tepper to Fuddy 3-page letter was dated 05/26/2012.
2. The electronic version of this 3-page letter appeared on Scribd on 06/06/2012
3. The Tepper four-page electronic document 10513240131.pdf (same as 35-1.pdf} was created on
06/04/2012 and was last modified on 06/06/2012. Pages 1-3 of this document are the 3 electronic
pages of the Tepper to Fuddy letter that appeared on Scribd on 06/06/2012. The 4th electronic page is
the Tepper page 4, LFCOLB. This four-page document was filed in MS on 06/06/2012.
4. We really don't know when the Tepper page 4 LFCOLB was created.
5. The paper copy of the one-page Onaka to Tepper verification letter was dated 05/31/2012.
6. The electronic version, which is court document 35-2, was created on 06/04/2012 and was last
modified on 06/06/2012. This one-page electronic document was filed in MS on 06/06/2012.
I believe that the most likely scenario is that Tepper created a paper copy of his three-page letter to
Fuddy on 05/26/2012. He attached a paper printout copy of the original WH LFCOLB and mailed this
four-page paper copy to Fuddy.
Tepper and Onaka then collaborated to alter the WH LFCOLB to create the Tepper page 4 LFCOLB.
On 06/04/2012, Tepper created the documents 10513240131.pdf (same as 35-1} and 35-2.
He then filed the two documents 35-1 and 35-2 in MS on 06/06/2012.
We really don't know the individual actions of either Tepper or Onaka with regards the modifications of
the WH LFCOLB PDF image file to create the altered LFCOLB PDF image file. Onaka may have modified
the WH LFCOLB and then sent the altered PDF image to Tepper as a one-page PDF image file. There is
APX323
12/4/2012 3:13PM
Document #1550250
http://us.mcl257.mail.yahoo.com/mc/showMessage?sMid= l2&filterBy=&.
Filed: 04/30/2015
nothing in his verification letter that indicates that he attached this altered LFCOLB to his verification
letter. However, his letter does refer to the LFCOLB copy that was purportedly attached to the four-page
request letter from Tepper to Fuddy.
Alternatively, Tepper might have had someone else modify the WH LFCOLB PDF image to create the
altered PDF image. That might explain why the METADATA was not entirely erased from his four-page
electronic document. We know that a scanner was used so Tepper's forger would have had to have
some means of re-sizing a scanned and altered image of the WH LFCOLB back to the correct size to
match a real 1961 Certificate of Live Birth printed form.
I am now certain that the 21 added objects which are invisible in Adobe Reader pre-existed before
06/04/2012 as a separate PDF image. The 21 objects include 121ine segements, 2 broad-line strikeouts
and 7 Black redaction rectangles. This "redaction" page is smaller than the LFCOLB image page size. I
have successfully separated this smaller "redaction" image from the flattened and altered WH LFCOLB
image in both Adobe Illustrator CS6 and lnkscape. I have attached my latest screenshots from Adobe
Illustrator as proof. The screenshot [105132401131_ss3.jpg] attached shows the "redaction" page slid
off the LFCOLB image page to the right. The background of the redaction" page is transparent.
/I
So an alternative scenario would be that Tepper had his forger modify the WH LFCOLB and Onaka
provided the "redaction" image to assist Tepper's forger re-size his scanned image. This would lessen
Onaka's invo
oft e fr udulen LFCOLB Te er a e 4 LFCOLB.
So scenario A would be that Onaka did the deed and scenario B would be that they collaborated to do
the deed.
Either way they both are guilty of attempting to pull off a bait and switch on Judge Wingate. They
substituted the Tepper page 4 LFCOLB for the WH LFCOLB and didn't tell Judge Wingate about the
switch.
I can provide a notarized copy of my sworn affidavit whenever you need it. Also, I can provide any of my
screen shots as required. I would prefer not to testify because of personal reasons. I also believe that. if
I were to testify, then I would quickly become a "punching bag" for the defense because I don't have an
IT certificate and I have never testified as a forensic expert.
Sincerely,
Henry
From: Pau l lrey
_ _ _ _ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 7763 (20121204)
APX324
~
of3
12/4/2012 3:13 p
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit 3
APX325
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v .Jeffries eta!. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.; 21948 I 2012
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
STATE OF NE\V YOJlK
COUNTY OF ULSTER
Accordingly~ I ~
a.
b.
c.
) ss.
)
H. \Villiam Van Allen. being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty ofpet:jury:
My place of business is located at 351 North Road Hurley New York 12243.
On November 14, 2012, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of the NOTICE OF
PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 13, 2012 along with a
d.
application at the Kings County Supreme Court Building at 10 AM on the 10th Floor intake at 360 Adams Street on
Monday November 19, 2012 placing a complete set in a properly addressed to each respondent listed below for
delivery by USPS by certified mail with request for return receipt for proof of service.
On November 14, 2012,1 caused each copy with proper postage for service by certified mail on the listed Electors and
where each envelope was properly addressed with thC' Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" and "PERSONAL &
CONFIDENTIAL" in the lower left hand corner of the envelop that was then deposited v.rilh the USPS for service upon:
l.
2.
-t..
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
II.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
CM I RR No 7012101000068749741
CM I RR No 7012101000068749819
M I RR N 7012101000068749758
CM I RR No 7012101000068749765
CM I RR 1'\o 7012101000068749956
CM I RR No 7012101000068749826
Ctvtl RR No 7012101000068749833
CM I RR No 7012101000068749840
CM I RR No 701210 I 000068749857
CM I RR No 7012101000068749864
CM I RR No 7012101000068749901
CM I RR No 7012101000068750242
CM I RR No 7012101000068749963
CM IRR No 7012101000068749796
CM / RR No 7012101000068749949
CM I RR No 70 121 01 000068749895
CM I RR No 7012101000068749970
CM I RR No 7012101000068749802
CM I RR No 7012101000068749772
CM I fU{ No 701210 I 000068749789
CM I RR No 7012101000068749871
CM I RR No 7012101000068749888
CM I RR No 7012101000068749918
CM I RR No 701210 I 000068749925
C~4 / RR No 7012101000068749932
Sworn to before me
This _l_~_ day of November 2012
JUDITH S. MAYHON
NOTARY PUBLIC, STA~ OF NEW YORK
NO. 01MA6095585
QUALIFIED IN ULSTER COUNTY/~
COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 14_20_ _
APX326
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Sinn!>,. JciTrin et ul. Ankle il! l"YSSC l<>r "in1:1 Coum) lndc:~ !\'n.: 21YIX
COU,T'\' m UL'ITER
Petitioner
Accunlingl~.l.
\',
f'
www.
0t17..7Cf...,-T7';f
1J
~~~D. C&.mpoc.
1~11
('fJUtl-ro"-ti~IUIOI'~""'"'
CM
S.,,";'f)t;'IOU~nlt-Jf.&\J:'\X
rutSamt.:tou.-..o-.,nY'lr..."
,;
C.. l JtR'W,'!ttl!lOl()fJJ(Jd1.C~Yt
t:\1~ f<R No' 1()l!IOJ1XI).~7&'111tt
CM-ItR s.,, ~l!IOHllYJ1'~7M.l1
("\1
RR"N..1fJI:toUX1fll.lni7~U
auur,..aa..-...t.u:u~~-lttthl'\.'"'ur'
,.Jth,tn;ct-
nt . JlR~70l~llllrut:O>I<7-!Wbl
t \1 KRHo101!fOitr~7W~U
<~t .
15. h.n JnltJ ... 101 tkriiK) \\c::r-= .... \cdefi ~, h'iiiJ
u ...\trtoC:I&neo) t'l&hdL.W - t~~y fl~~
l"' Gn-:d:db.J..a~c f ltl ~ '-'.~~..:Ktu;J- .\Ihar.).'Y z::us
IK II,,_R.-I'n,._Sum-IMI>;.,,Ny 14;)111
19 11-.o 0.11) tt-l l'm,4on Rno.l- - '>l' I .... In
!II .loMp!IMordloo<>ll.tHln:tr.,wllnc-~.:b....a..'-' ,.,.,..
!I Sn>ltAd.or II ~"'"""'-Um.adhr\. S\" U1~1
!: ~llflttll~~htrlte~oo.N.Jrl""'r-S'racvtc.S\'I.t!!4
:.c
<:t.t ! kR,~i'GI~JOI~'I"~"ii
I! 4rtlti,r Sprc~ttrcMIJ!W
~~-~ !'."'\' tl.f::)
I) C~f"CC'(;~bnt IJI)f..a\l:!..lif'IJ'Wrc'l-"""""' '-\' ftl.W,
l.t, RhH Pia1.Jr ,.t-.."'ttf'-'.!'-...\-oaa:, ..W-Ilcnn... ~"\ ' 10f:".l
C~l'
RR :-... ':'t.JU1ui(U"~7.6'179(
RIC. ~101210t(),j(Qti.J'7oiCII)...J
f"\1.'kRS4t1tll11n1~7.a~5
l'\I.-JUtSo't'U!II\UJ(O.):.S7fYii1'C
C\1 'RR ,..,?OI!IOitnlllbl7~
(\I; RR S.o lUI :IU1110lll!.al<'177!
C\liiUI!I.u71!1UitnJIW?'171'
01 1 RilN< 70l~IUIOOOQbl7ol'lS71
CM 1 Rk!'4o7tu:!t010t(l'.lf'.x:71VIS&
l'MifUt~t,TUI!U')If)fri1Mi~IS
lr...,S&lalflllk"~""\ncr~,-lau.,a.~V
(''\.f,JUt~101!,010(~'74~!j
IU..\0
SlatihCoa.r~l}:;ltL~ctt:-Mr~cnrr..ilJc..N\ I:!IA'i.
:!6 Ktntrn GWibnod idt lk..' Unite ~""'l fhn~ll "~lr.r
!'
. . {){' ~'SIU
("\l.'fUth..I"MI!JtJitYJ))a.I'IW'In
C~ :RM "~(UU\&1~1-..'0
~~~~~
~
/William\'"" ,\lien
'\'"'"' In befctt: me
Ink '.Y_ d:l) of!'o~b<:T 1011
"NKSoftlt~IOf(J(Al.""t':.l~Afq
l"\1 RR
c~1
.!1
>E"E? :
flal.fttaJc-Rrkt.~'lJft!i."'''ftjUA~,:I:.\-IIn"*t,r... '\\'II!JA
..d,, Orth
~:Lt:C'TOR.oO;
ULCI.AR.\TUR\' RI:LIEt' :\S TO I:LEl'TUR.o;,,. Nou<e .,s ~ inten ru r.Jo an unlrr '" ohow .-..u....
~ppl:rotlun a~ I lhf' ..:mf:- CrJU:nty Suprrmt' Coun Bu~ at 10 o\..\t oo thr lD"t Flour tn:Akr at 3fD :\.d.un.s s..:nrt tX1
~,.lo:bl,- ~..-mt~ 19. 101:/ p{fton(t o. c~pkorr- oe.ct (n .a f?Juprtf) ddreurd to ("A(h r~in~t :a,.tC'd t~kM lof
tklJWf)' by (.,"'SP".:) t')' C"'r.':':.tf11'1d U"'.&A! -.1.1h l"fUI"-.1 kill tt:"ttlttt trc.Ti$M iCI flrotlf ef -.en"icf'
0!1 ~d'\.-mtrr l4. :.tOl'J,I CA\flilr'1J ,..ac"ht"'f'f"l~h pn.~ ~ lor'WT'l'ir.r\J:rC1"'11j(tr,d ~114>fl :~ li"'rd )Jn-h:lnl.t.l!'lt
atwrr. ""'h e!IW!c.fw: ou. f'1"l(W"fh a.Slhr._,d with lhr. S'!lLiGc.: mc,n t.:J~f'U:t\7 !.J;;t;At.. SR\.1Cfo:- and t-yJlSQ~f\J &
CO~TtOE:fTLU..'"' ~"\ tht Jowet-1rl't ~nd corneT 9l thr r'ft'l.<elup tl-..oal \U\s lhnl dc'~tt'\.1 th lhr 1.!51"!' rar V'f'\1':'1'" upun
(;nc~llnt"(l4~14 ~Q.\,~-I~t'..;.NY II,S.C
P I - take aotlco or Petitioner's intent to me an order to show cause application at the IGnga
County Supreme Court Building at 11 AM on the J()lh Floor intake at 360 Adama Street on Monday
November 19, 2012 Cor a pn:liminaJy injunction relief pending a declaratory judgment ou issues or
law; e.g., Are public offietm~ to be held liable aa acceuorieo to felonies in usurpation or Ollice or
PO'I'US and Ballot ea:eaa? Are public oll'=n presented with the facbl ofBarack Obama ineligibility
able to change qualifications before the Electoral College Vote scheduled December 15, 2012?
ft>F
fl. William \'an Allen. ht:in~ du1~ ~"om. d.:r<nt: o.nd .:1y Wider pc:llllll) ufpnJu~
()n ~1)'\nntrJ' I.&, 2011. Uuiw~ Strunlc lnurw:ttd ~r ro vn~,. ~~ ~IOI"nnr..! c."''P')' nf the JIIOTICE OF
PETITION, PETmOJf with AFFIDAVIT OF VERlFICAnOJf &lf~tn><d l'io......,t..r ll, JOIJ .U.JG~! "''h
'IITICf: Of I;\'Tf~'H TO Fll.f AS OROJ:K TO SIIOW (.',\l:Sl: ,\J'l'I.ICATIOS HIK A Ml1.1\II"'AKV
I.
feR
,...
:!01:!
llalteemJdlncsJSUndcrhiiiA....,ue,WlA-IIn>olci)ID,NY 11238
B~l Dollllsio of44211111 Sired -llrooldyu. NY 11215
J. Fclix0rtirl89833nl5out-Brooldya,NYII232
........._.....
I .a.at... i iJA l!:iJtk .tJttl .aiChW .1 1 t!.f:i.
5. GcnldO. lcaoinpoflllSNewSccllondRDod-Aibu)',NY 1220ll
6. CioorJc Gr<sham 1313 Eut 233n!Strm- BI'DID. NY 10466
7. Rllba!Dilz.h.ofll2illloyUIIIAvmoc,16D-Bnm.NY 111473
8. llyron8rowni4Blainc5aed-Bul&lo,NY 14208
9. Robat DuffY 164 c.o,don Raod- Rochc:oter, NY 14610
10. .Joseph Marcile orm Docri'odd omc- Rocbcsk:r, NY 14609
.W. TvwDiRiptJD JOO<AUIICatk&d OidiHat;lfl 11201
I.
2.
3o
593VanderbiltAvenue-28l
Brooklyn New York 11238
Cellphone: 845-901-6767
Email: cbris@strunlt. ws
------------------- ---~-------------------
U.S. Postal
/Dt>fnN'I<:Ik"Only:N.,lr~~Prtn-1
~ ! i, # II
H' I. 4
:
llllgl.ljt-ll'tllZlB.
r
...
!;;
Cl
~ +;d . it .
a. P.flf'
........ - - - -
c-,..,. Pmwldn
"'C:~-
Fl.l9llllil!Yu~
t4.85
-=--...
=-=!-----'"'+'<+--!
.......
s... --~------'=~,;,.
~ .......
Cl
IDcmeo":IWIOtr'r:Nolnwrr.=
Servlcc~
ruf"-.--
Holteem Jeffries
3S Underbill Avenue. N2A Bnx>klyn. NY 11231
""~,_.- ..
c.,fJIO,..
r- J(Ji ;;.,.JI;C- ..
_.
!:!!
.' -
JJ
:r'iii\i.J\Jiii
~
..D
&!
ti.JO
EmilyGiskc
440 West 241h Street-
1
!!'l!!mm!!l
111
MAIL~
-~-'''
RECEIPT
{[lo;ooe><kl&fl(},-,/y;HclrW~'-"'~)
~ ~:~
"'
r'l
0
,..........--,...
,IV_,_
a.~
W;hnCoot''T
ISO We>~ 96th S~~tt~ RI~Cl
Nc>A Ymt. NY
100~
APX327
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
-~---l
-- ........i
"I ;,
__
-...
:::0
.-'I
!l:\::~
~ .,""'_""
1 ""- ~
"'
1'
..
...
~ ~7
..- ~~
..........
~~72.:;~~~~.e.:;;,_od!
f
.\
.:,
CERTIFIED MAIL"'
: ~:_:- ;:f.
RECEI~T ..-
StephanleMiner
102 Woodside DriveS)fKUS~!, NY l l2H
~tlci.L&JIO<"Y:No~eo......,_~
APX328
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 mssc for Kings County Index No.; 21948 I 2012
()
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
STATE OF NEW.YORK )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KINGS
IfAt..L
11
20
On November 30, 2012, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of the PETITIONER'S
SECOND AFFIDAVIT 1R SUPPORT OF OSC with ~BITS annexed AFFIRMED November 30,2012 along with a copy
of the NOTICE OF PETITION, PETITION with AFFIDAVIT OF VERIFICATION affirmed November 13, 2012
placing a complete set in a properly addressed envelope to each respondent listed below for delivery by USPS regular
mail.
d. On November 30, 2012, I caused each copy with proper postage for service by first class mail on the listed Electors and
where each envelope was properly addressed with the Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" and PERSONAL &
CONFIDENTIAL" in the lower left hand comer of the envelop that was then deposited with the USPS for service upon:
1.
2.
3/ ~' Q~i,..., Go r~t-~~ AJ tw 11 tF~ ccg r-1../ ""'>8 ~v~s~~v WI'L'Jf! ~ Z4t""lV
02-~
Sworn ~ pefore me
This ~~l(iay ofNovember 2012
~oJ..J/fee u
. .-
...,
KAMAL P. SONl
Notary Public, State o1 New York
No. 01 S06089949
Qualified in. Kings Co~~~Y 2015
Commission Expres Marc
'
APX329
J(a(l
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit 4
APX330
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
UCS-840 (312011)
Supreme
lAS_Entry Date
Kings
COURT, COUNTY OF
Index No:
z.ur~
2J'Jlf0 -
CAPTION:
ano.
97RLIN"-
Judge Assigned
Zo/11..
K.JI.LJate
tf more space is
J/ltS..f"~
..fliiRIIIC&)IPetltloner(s)
-a11ainst-
-HAJ(~~r\1
l<e.'~ ~,. T~ \.)Jfl' Gt-t-r1 C.H"iltS?rtvE. acu ,..r~J wLUAn~ //-tdn-,f3SoNJ Seon ..Pr/2./NGC:fl
tftzl '-'-( ~~ !t<E" /i NPfF Y'tlArz.t fS A fll~~d ~ r!J, }7-ttc J'f1 fZ S~G M tl'l..r t;~ RGf; 6 ~fjtR;:.
1
Rvr3Jtv v~A2 Jll. J 11rltn-t~ <CrU:MTt:l1 &:-~w D--,Je1.ii\JJ~l.J tey/24/N ell4~.J2:
_:
l( ~ 6'en::r f)U#,..-ry 1 J os~l-\ no~ S"C<rlr ~~ntSjSter'PArv'~ hi ,~-eh--J ~ "P~ ~ ~
-e
.DW d -IRtQI
an
t(n)
ndent s
MATRIMONIAL
Contested
Uncontested
NOTE: For all Matrimonial actions where the parties have children under
the age of 18, complete and attach the MATRIMONIAL RJI Addendum.
TORTS
QAsbestos
Breast lmp&ant
REAL PROPERTY:
How me
Motor ~ehicle
Foreclosure
PropertY Address:
Products Liabffity:
(specify)
Straet Address
City
Stale
Zip
NOTE: For Foreclosure actions involving a one- to four-family, owrie~occupied, residential property, or an owner-occupied condominium,
Other Negljgenc'e:
0
0
QOtherTOrt
Block:
Lot
(specify)
(specify)
SPECIAL PROCEEDINGS
OTHER MATTERS
[see NOTE under Commercia~
Certificate of lneotpOration/Dissolution
Other Commercial:
iQ Condemnation
(epeclfy)
f"Yl
;u
~. ::r
Environmental:
(specify)
-.:5 r-
Contract
Insurance (where insurer Is a
(specify)
(apecify)
0
0
0
0
0
0
:0
.0
)?'Election Law
.
.
MHL Article 9.50 (Kendra's Law}
Habeas Corpus
0
0
0
0
Other:
Mechanic's Lien
Name Change
Pistol Permit Revocation
He~ring
0
0
0
0
(spectfy)
I")...::: ~=:~
..,. -
(specify) '
'
'
":
l",.
o.,
APX331
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Comoromise
Notice M Motion
NotiCe of Pe-tition
Relief Sought:
0
0
0
Relief Sought:
Relief Sought
Date:----------
Return
Return Date:
Relief Sought:
JJ~
~~~~~------
~ 1 '1- 0 1"Z-
Other (specify):
lnsuranee "Cariter(s):
~ttl~
LatNwne
Last Name
rllt~Jd
Firm Name
F"nttume
FhtName
fiiX
Firm ......
Prlrn.y Role:
Fbi-
First Name
Primary Role:
Seconclary Role
Finn ......
....
llf any):
Fa
I AFFIRM UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT, TO MY KNOWLEDGE, OTHER THAN AS NOTED MOVE, 'nfERE ARE AND
HAVE BEEN NO RELATED ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS, NOR HAS~RE
ST F~ JUDICIAL Ill ERVEif110II PREWlUSLY 8EB1
/ -:
Dated: //"' /
...
~~
3
SIGNATURE
APX332
__
.O(TCA{
....X (et~JF
~Print Form
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et al. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Index No.: 21948-2012
Exhibit 5
APX333
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
------------------------------------------------------------------------><
CHRISTOPHER-EARL STRUNK
PETITIONER
-------------- -------X
Upon the foregoing papers, petitioner purchased an index number with the County
Clerk and submits an order to show cause with the court for signature. Although it is
difficult to discern the exact nature of the relief sought by petitioner, the main thrust of his
papers seems to challenge the validity of the November 6, 2012 election ofKirsten Gillibrand
to the office ofUnited States Senator from the State of New York. Specifically, the petition
states that "Petitioner wishes the Court to void the U.S. Senate Election and ask the Governor
set a special election, because a significant number of the electors casting their respective
vote were domiciled in New York for less than five years." At a minimum, both the
Governor and the Board of Elections in the State of New York are necessary parties in any
proceeding seeking such relief. However, neither has been named here. In this regard, the
court notes that in an order dated April 11, 2012, Hon. Arthur Schack of this court
specifically enjoined petitioner "from commencing future litigation in the New York State
Unified Court System against the New York State Board of Elections [and] Andrew Cuomo
APX334
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
ENTER,
J. S.C.
APX335
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Strunk v Jeffries et l. Article 78 NYSSC for Kings County Inrlex No.; 21948/2012
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
STATEOFNEWYORK )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KINGS
)
Accordingly, I,
a.
b.
c.
d.
-~"::_HttN
HAL-L
II z..o/0
On DECEMBER 6,. 2012, Christopher Strunk instructed me to serve a true conformed copy of the PETITIONER'S NOTE
OF ISSUE WITH CERTIFICATE OF READINESS FOR TRIAL AFFIRMED DECEMBER 6, 2012 WITH PETITIONER'S
AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF NOTE OF ISSUE WITH CERTIFICATE OF READINESS FOR TRIAL WITH FIVE
EXIDBJTS ANNEXED AFFIRMED DECEMBER 6, 2012 with each set in a properly addressed envelope to each
respondent listed below for delivery by USPS regular mail.
On DECEMBER 6, 201?., I caused each copy with proper postage for service by frrst class mail on the listed Electors and
where each envelope wns properly addressed with the Notification "URGENT LEGAL SERVICE" and u PERSONAL &
CONFIDENTIAL" in the lower left hand comer of the envelop that was then deposited with the USPS for service upon;
1.
P. David Soares Office of Albany District Attorney 6 Lodge Street, Room 401, Albany, NY 12207
Robert T Johnson The Office of the Bronx County Distnct Attorney 198 East 161st Street Bronx, NY 10451
Frank A. Sedita. Ill Eric County District Attomey's Office: 25 Delaware Avenue Buffalo, New York 14202
Charl~;:S J. Hynes Kings County District Attorney's Office 350 Jay Street Brooklyn, New York, r..'Y 11201
Sandra Ooorley Monroe County Oi5trict Attorney's Office. 47 South Fitzhugh Street Rochester. NY 14614
J<Blhleen M. Rice Office ofNBWiu County District Attomcy 262 Old Country Road Mineola., NY II SOl
1.
Cyrus R. Vance, 1r Tlle New Yoti: County Disrriet Attom...<>y's Office One Hogan Place New York. NY I 0013
Wllliam J. Fitzpntr.dt Onond.rtga County DA 's Office Cnrninal Coons Building - 4th Floor 50S South State Street Symcusc, NY 13202
8.
9.
Fmncis D. Phillips Office of the Orange County Dislrict Attorney 40 Matthews Street Gcshtn, NY 10924
10 Richard A. Brown Queens County District Attorney's Office 125-01 Queens Boulevard Kcw Gardens, N~ Yorlc I 1415
ll. Thomas J. Spota Suffolk County District Attorney's Office Nor1h County Complex - Building 77 Veteratu Memol"Ull Highway Hauppauge; NY 1I 7&8
12. Gwen Wilkinson Office: of Tompkins County D1strict Attorney 320 North TIOga Street Ithaca, New York 14850
evtn .
g
1c.e
as m
n
ey untCl
er Ul mg
o
14. Jnnc:t DiFiore Office ofWest.::hestt>r Disrrict .o\ttomey Ill Dr. Manm Luther Klng. Jr. Blvd. While Plains, New Yorlc 10601
15. Joshua Pepper NYS Assia!lnl Attorney General Office of Attorney Genemt 120 Broadway NY NY I 0171
16. Andrew M. Cuomo 138 E:1gie Street - Albany, NY 12202
17. Gerald D. Jennings of I 135 New &otland Rood- Albany,t-.'Y 12208
18. George Gresham 1313 Bast l33rd StTeet -Bronx, NY 10466
19. Ruben Diaz, Jr. of820 Boyton Avenue, #60- Bronx. NY 10473
20. Byron Brown 14 Blaine Street- Buffalo, NY 14208
189 B 33rd Street - Brooklyn, NY 11232
21. FeliX
22. Haketm Jeffries 3S Underhill Avenue, #2A w Brooklyn, NY 11238
23. Bill DeBlasio of 442 I I th Street- Bt'OOklyn. NY 11215
24. Robert Duffy 164 Croydon Road- Rochester, NY 14610
25. Joseph Mon:lle of 1.33 Deerfield Drive- Rochester, NY 14609
26. Tom DiNapoli 100 Great Neck Road- Great Neck, NY 11201
27. Eric Schneidcnnan 645 West End Avenue, #8F- New YorfriNY 10025
28. Welter Cooper ISO West 96th Street.lfl2G- New York, NY 10025
29. Sheldon Silver of SSO Grnnd Street, liSA -New York, NY I0002
30. Keith L.T. Wrightof222S Fifth Avenue~ NC'VI' York. NY 10037
3 I. Christine C. Quinn of 263 Ninth Avenue, #3A- New York, NY 1000 I
32. William Thompson of lOti West I 21st Stra:t- New York, NY 10027
33. ScottStrinccrof 155 West 71stStreet,#3A- New York. NY 10023
34. EmilyGiskcof440Wcst24th Street- New York. NY 10014
35. Scott Adam6 of II Poplar Avcnw:- Orchard Part, NY 14127
.36. Stephanie Miner l 02 Woodside Drive - Syracuse. NY 13224
37. Mario Cilento) Isabel Road- Orangeburg. NY 10962
38. Anne Marie Am:alone 2827 48th Street- Astoria. NY 11103
39. Grace
of 14714 34th Avenue- Flushing, NY 113.54
40. Archie Spigner of I 1210 17Srh Sln:et- Jamaica. NY 11433
41. Sceve Bellone l 07 Vanderbih Avenue - West Babylon, NY 11704
42 lrene Stein 101 Brand}'Wine Drive -I~ NY 14850
43. Sheila Comar 29 Depot Street - Middle Granville, NY 12849
44. Ken Jenkms 108 Bushey A~rrue -Yonkers, NY 10710
45. Kirshn (~illibrand w1th DC Offic:e 478 Russell Washington, DC 205 ! 0
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ortu
Mens
Sworn to before me
This ~+ day of December 2012
Notary P
1c
KAMAL P. SONI
Notarv Public, State of New York
J No. 01 806089949
Ouallf4ed in Kings Counry
CommtSSIOn Expires March 31,2015
APX336
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Index No.:
-------
---z
21948-2012
Petitioner,
---------------------------x
SEVERANCE
Ex 1 - 27 April 2012 White House Press Conference transcript
Ex 2 ... Paul Edward lrey Affidavit with Exhibits A through D affmned December 4, 2012
follow~up
Dated:
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
Brooklyn, N~ York
December
, 2012
(( ~ )
~~
Christopher Earl Strunk in esse, petitioner
593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281,
Brooklyn, New York 11238.
(845) 901-6767 E-mail: chris@strunk.ws
APX337
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
---------------------------------------x
Christopher Earl Strunk,
Plaintiff,
I.A.S. Part 47
-against-
Defendants.
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
----------------------------------------------------X
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.
COUNTY OF KINGS
Accordingly, I, itV'ii...t.,fE;;
VV.aff\i~~/P'.J
d.
On September 18, 2014, Christopher Earl Strunk instructed me to serve tnle conformed copies of The
Order of the Court of9-11-2014 in the case with Index No.: 21948-2012 with a true copy of the Note of
Issue filed 12-7-2012 IN THE CASE WITH Index no: 29642-2008, by regular mail with each envelope
marked "Personal and Confidential" for delivery by the USPS upon respondents and or counsels listed
below.
On September 18, 2014, I caused each of the copies \\ri.th proper postage for service by regular mail and
then de osited with ro
osta e
ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Attorney General of NYS by:
JOSHUA PEPPER, Esq. AAG
120 BROADWAY- 24th Floor
New York, NY 10271-0332
Democratic Party
Commissioner of the Brooklyn
Boro of NYC Board of Elections
Executive Office
32 - 42 Broadway~ 7 Fl
New_York, NY 10004
Republican Party
Commissioner of the Brooklyn
Boro of NYC Board of Elections
Executive Office
32 - 42 Broadway, 7 Fl
New York, NY 10004
Sworn to before me
This
MATTHEWS HUGGINS
N ary Public, State of New York
N.o: Ol.HU6103403
Qu~h~md rn l<ings County
Jf
APX338
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C StreetNW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
10 1 Independence Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION
TO SEAL AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES
Exhibit 25
APX339
Document
#1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
343 of 437
THE SECURITY
PAPER
BACKGROUND
ON Page
OBAMA'S
BIRTH CERTIFICATE IS THE WRONG SIZE!
Compare it to other birth certificates from Hawaii during the same period.
See how the hash marks on a normal birth certificate are larger than Obama's.
This row of hash marks is from the bottom of the Alan birth certificate and was moved slightly to the left in order to line up the first hash mark.
Then move your eyes to the rigtht to see how the hash marks progressivly get larger than Obama's smaller hash mark art.
This led to my viewing the difference in size and I first assumed that it was her forgery that had the wrong size security
background because the full sheet apparently was never
scanned.
So I sent my results to Doug and he reminded me that he
had handled the forged document and that it was printed to a
full size sheet of 8.5" x 11" security paper.
APX340
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION
TO SEAL AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES
Exhibit 26
APX 341
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Document #1550250
EX
IT
Filed: 04/30/2015
A
A
A
A
The width of the security paper that the birth certificate is printed to.
Doug Vogt and I picked these points of reference to measure the width and depth of the form.
Proof of the shortfall of the security paper when aligned to match the other hash marks.
I darkened and sharpened this part of the hash marks on Savanna's pic to make them visible.
This is the original and only hash mark security paper available ... reduced to align with the other
hash marks on the birth certificate . proving that extra hash mark background had to be created
and added to fill the 8 112" width.
Savannah Guthrie
~-
-~
EXHIBITE
This page is the Savanna Guthrie pic taken with her cell phone at the White House on
27 April 2011. I have lightened this pic up to bring out the image of the hash mark security paper. She did not photographt the document all the way to the bottom and included up to just above the name.
What we do need to be concerned about is the position of the hash marks in relation
to the full 8.5" width
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
See the first panel below which is a section of my scan of the actual security paper. I found that
I had to reduce the standard paper by V16th in width to match the smaller hash marks in the
panel below Then to allow the pattern to cmtinue to the right margin I had to oddV16" of new
hash mark art just as the forger did. This area is represented by the red square dot seen below
here and also blown up at the right
I feel that the forger . in order to create an escape hatch for herself later _ went to the trouble
of deliberately altering the hash mark art background so as to make it different and identifiable
as her own work. The only possible purpose of this alteration of the hash mark art backgrcxm
was to use it to validate her eventual confession that the forgery of Obama's long form birth certificate was her own work . self-identified by her deliberate alteration of the hash mark art
~:::.ll;}J:=II~*.ii'IJ1=,,=,,;}J:=II.~II;}J::::II;}J:=II;}J:=,,;}J:::II;}J:=II;}J:::II;}J:=II;}J:=,,=,,~11;}J:::II4J:=,,~II~=II;}J:::II~II~::II
i;JI;:;;JI;;JI.JI~:;;JI~JI;=;JI;=JI=JI=JI=JI=J!=JI:=JI:4:1f:=JI=JH:::JI=JH=Jn=:JI=Jl=:JI::
1 W.~Tii~!;'fi:~li:~Ti~li::!!;'[~lfnll:~T[~Ti~T[~JI~1f~1[~'[~1[~'[~T[~T[~T[~T[~T[~l[~
~Jklf.~l[Jklf.~lf.Jklf.Jkl[Jklf.~Jklf.~1f~lf.~lf.Jk1f~lf.Jklf.Jklf.:!4lf.Jklf.Jklf.Jk1f.Jklf.Jklf.Jklf.:m
!r:!!F.IIP:JIFJ1=JI:=J1=J.!:=J!:=JL=J!:=J!:=J1=JL=J!:=J!:=J!:=J!:=J!:=J1=J!:=J1=J1=JL=J!
m~iT.~u.4!ill.~u.Jku.4!m:4!m:~u.Jkii.~1i~ii.:l4ii.:l41i~ii.:l41i.~1i.~if.:!41i.Jkii.Jkii.4!m:J!m:Jkii.~
:JJ;If.Jkm~~~~~~.~~~~~~~lf.Jkii.:!4W.Jku.~w.~ll~lf.~"-~"-~m!!ffi.~lf.Jku.~il:!lill.~lf.~.~ll
Fti:IJ:==,,Jk=tl:!!:=ll:t!:=,,J!:=ti:!!:=,.J!f.?.IIJ!:=IIJ!:=,,J!:=,,J!:=IIJ!:=IIJ!:=,,J!:=,,J!:=,,J!:=IIJ!:=,,J!:=IIJ!:==,,:!J:=II:!!:=,,J!:=,,J!:=IIJ!1
f:J!:=HH#:m=J!:=J!:=mFiiL=J!:==Ji=J!:=Jn=JL=JL=tm=J!:=J!:=mi=m.:=mJ='Ji=J!:=JL=J!:=:lli
~JL~~~~:!!:;n::!!:;n;~:!!::u;:!!:;[~='!:JL='!:JL:!!:JL:!!:;n;:Y:;n;:!!:;n;:!l:;[Jkii.:!l:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:JL:M:;m
~-,,:!1-,,:Y:-,,:!!F,,:M:-,,:M:-,,J.!:-,,:U:-,,:M:-,,&-,,:U:-,,:!l:-,,&-,,&-,,:M:-,,&-m,JL-,,:M:-,,&=,,&-,,:M:-,,&-,,&-,,&-,,:
!II~U?.Il~IIF.II~JIPill.~ll?.ll!=iii?.IIF.IIF.II?.II?.II?.II~lib;IJF.IIF.IIF.IIF.IIF.IIF.IIF.
i!L~~J!fu:!!:J14!:K&J1J!~J14!:~J1:!!:J1:!!:J1:!!:J1:!!:J1:!!:~J14!:J1&J1:!!:J1:!!:J1:!!:J1&J1~
iii~~~;n;:!!:;n:~:!!:~~:!!:~;n;:!!:;n;:!!:J[:!k;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:l!:;[:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:~
=,, u:-.:nrmm~.u:-JI:-.n. .u:-m:-.11:-.n:-.11:-.n:-.n:-.n:-.JL-.u:-.II:-.II:-.n:-.II:-.1I:-.ti:-.II:-.tl,
1 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 11
m=~cfifti.=i=Ji~J1:;;if.~~=H=J1=J1=J1=J1~J1~=J1=~~=J1=J1=J1=JTI
~li.~*:!!:FAE4!:;n:4!l[~:!!:;u::!!:;n;:!!:~J1];J1~;n:~:!!:;n::!!:J14!:JL:!!:;n::!!:;n;:!!:Jn
~lr..Lin!!~J!:~Ii&~~:!!:;n:~JJm:Jk;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n::ll:;n:JJ:;n:&;n;&;n::M:;n;:M:Jr='!:JL:Y:Jr='!:Jr='!:Jn
~jliJ!:iflr~='k~jfJ!::!!:~:!!:;m!!m;~:!!:~~:!!:;n::!!:~;n::!!:;n:4!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;m
Cl.:>
~ii.Jim.:!klf~,,~ii.Jkii.~ii.~ii.~ii.~ii.~ii.:!!m:Jim:~ii.~ii.~ii.Jkii.~H.:l!m:~ii.JkH.Jkn.J!m:4!m
~=,,J!:r,JJ:=,,J!:=,,&=,,&=,,J!:=,,&=,,&=,,:!J:=,,&=,,&=,,&=,,J!:=,,:M:=,,&=,,&=,,&=,,&=,,J!:=,,:!!:=,,&=,,J!:=,,J!:=,,
:n:=JJ::;II=li=II=II=II=II=II=II=II=II=II==II=II=II=II=II=II=II=It=ll=ll=ll=
f[~~~lf.~~1f.~1f.~~'[~1f.~1f.~1[~'[~1f.~1[~1[~1f.~1f.:!41f.~1f~lf.~1f.~lT.~~1f.~
ill.~lf.:!4U.:!lill.~ll.~lf.~J!ru.:!4~1f.~lf.~lf.~lf.~lf.Jkii~W.~II.~II.~If.~lf.~lf.~lf.~lf.~lf.~
fll.Jklf.J!m.~~~~~.~u.Jkll.~lf.:!411.~1l4kii.Jkll.~ll.~ll.:!41f.~lf.~H.~If.~ll.~ll.:!l;ll~lf.~lf.J!
~:!h~[t:t!:J1~:ll:J1:l!:J1:!!::!!:J1='!:J1:l!:J1:!!:J1='!::!!:J14!:J1:l!:J14!:4!:~~:!!:~:!!:~:ll:J1:!!::!!:J1~
lill::!!:JI:!!m::M:~Jr&JL&Jr:!kJr:M::u;:l!:;n::!!:;n;:ll:;n;:!k;n::t!m;&Jr:M:Jr:U:~~:ll:Jr&;mll:;n;&;n;~
~&;n;4kJL~;[:I1;[4!:~;n;:!!:;n;41;[:!1;[:!1;[:!1~;n;:!!:;n;:l!:;[~:!!:;n::!!:J[Jk;[:l!:;[4!:~;[='!:JL~
llb&~:M:~~;n;:M:;n:&J1:!'=:!!:;n:&JL:I!:J1&;n;&;n;&;n:&JL:M:;m!l:&~~K:M:Jr&JL:!!:K~
rn~li:~n~l~li:4kli:~1i.~li:4kii.~1i.~1i.~1i.:l41i:~ii.Jkii.~lf.:l41i.:l41i.~1i.~1i.~ii.4lm:~ii.:l41i.~
ill.~U.~ii.J!m.~II.~II.~W.~II.~U.~If.~lf.~lf.~II.~U.~If.~U.J!:If.~U.~II~II.Jklf.~ii~U.~U.~
l!LIIiiffiflr:llilemtl:!rltJ!m;IJ1-IIJ!r-IIJL-IIJL-JI'II:-IIJ!r-lllli:-IIJ1-IIJ1-IIJ1-IIJ!:-IIJ1-IIJ1-IIJ1-IIJ1-IIJ1-IIJ!r-IIJ1-IIJ1-II:
~JkjL:!!:~='!:J1:!l::IL:!!:J1:l!:J1:!!:~:!!:~:!1J1:!!:J1:!14!:J1:!l:J1:!!:~:!!:J1:!!:~~:!!:J1:!!:~J1='!:J1~
!i1Jii~&:m:!!.i~m:JLar~:U[~&;n:J!:j14!:;n::M:Jr:!!:;n;&;n;:Y:;u;:M:~JL&;n;:M:Jr&;n;:!!:;ml1;n;&K~
~~JL&~JI1:!!:;n;&JI&~j:!!:;n;ct!:;n;:!!:~;n;4!:;n;~~;IL~;n::!!:;n;:!!:;n::!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;~
dbii...Jim>llr.o:ll::::ll::::lbll::-:-:ll=ll=ll=lldl=llr.;:ll=lldbll=l'=ll='l=ll=l'=ll:
:=n::u:::ll::rr:=rr:=rr::u::u::u::rr::rr::rr::rr::::u::rr::rr::rr:=rr::u:::lr::rr::rr::rr::rr
OO:=if~:;Jk=iJJJ=JI~=JTI=:ID=J.li=JTI=K=K=K~ii}=~K=~~=K=K=JI==~
~
Ql
~lli=llli=llll=llll=llli=llli=lll?.lli=llll=illi=llli=llli=llll=illl=illi:=ill~lli=illi:=ill~lli:=illi=iii~II~IIP
t[,4J:=5,,J!:=,,4J:=,,:!J:=,,&=,,:!JF,,&=,,Jk=,,4J:=,,4J:=,,JJ:=,,JJ:=,,Jk=,,J!:=,,:!J:=,,&=,,&=,,J!:=,,J!:=,,J!:=,,&=,,&=,,:!J:=,,~
!!L:I!:jL:I!:&~J!:~~J1~J1:!1J14!:~J1:!!:J14!:j14!:J1:!1J1:!!::!!:J1:!!:J1:!!:J1:!!:J1:!'=J14!:J1~~
~;n:J!m;~lti:M:;n::M:;n;:!k~~:!!:JIJk;[:Y:;[:l!:~;[~:!!:;n;4!:;[:!!:;[:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!'=;n;:!!:;n;:!'=;n;~
>
~
~:!!:;n;~:M:~;[:!!:;n;:!!:;[:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;u;~:!!:;n;:!!:;u::!!::rr;:!!:~;n;:!!:;n;:!!:jli!k;n;:!!:;n;~
m::!!:;n;:!l:];~:!l:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;[:l!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:!!:;n;:M:;n;:!!:J[Jk;n;:!!:;[:I!:J[Jk;n;:!!:;n;~
r-,,:U:-,,:!!:=,,JJ:-,,:M:-,,&-,,&-,,:M:-,,:M:-,,&-,,&-,,:!!:-,,&-,,:M:-,,&-,,:M:-,,4!:-,,&-,,:M:-,,&-,,:M:-,,&-,,:U:r,&-,,~
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
I 01 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION
TO SEAL AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES
Exhibit 27
APX 346
ail- RE:
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
RE:
1 message
chris@strunk.ws <chris@strunk.ws>
To: Paullrey <paulireysecret@gmail.com>
http://associationforsovereignhomerulewithin.org/
REPLY TO cestrunck@yahoo.com or chris@strunk.ws
APX 347
11/8/2014 7:00PM
Gmail- RE:
Document #1550250
https://mail.google.com'mail/h/lpwks2bfxecru/?&v=pt&ser=AIKcX55lk
Filed: 04/30/2015
Then maybe the new Senate will finally react to the will of the people.
Most of the gun grabbers are out of the Senate and Congress now.
And amnesty aint' gonna happen with 75/o of the public against it.
But the best way to get rid of ObamaCare is to get rid of Obama.
Paul
APX 348
2 of2
1118/2014 7:00 I
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C StreetNW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
101 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
ERIC HOLDER, US ATTORNEY GENERAL
950 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington DC 20530
-----------------------------------------------------------------x
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION
TO SEAL AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES
Exhibit 28
APX 349
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
HISTORY RE-VISITED.
1 January, 2011.
Certain names have loomed large in history of the Philippines over the past 100
years. Without being unjust to those who made a meaningful contribution to the
independence and autonomy of the Philippines, it can be fairly claimed that the
names which have attracted the most public attention are those of Jose Rizal,
Ferdinand Marcos, Tomoyuki Yamashita, and perhaps Don Estaban Benitez
Tallano.
Everyone has their own story to tell of the good work of Rizal in terms of his
patriotic writing : of Ferdinand Marcos and Martial Law : of Tomoyuki Yamashita
and "his buried treasure" : and of course the Tallano Clan and their claim as true
title-holders of the ORIGINAL Spanish Land Title known as OCT No. T -01-4.
The writer of this article holds that those four names are universal conversation
pieces in the Philippines, and few evenings pass that one or another is not
mentioned in conversation with friends and associates.
One would imagine that with such names being universal conversation pieces,
that nothing in their life has been spared intense scrutiny, and that there is nothing
yet to be revealed about their respective lives.
If there is nothing yet to be revealed about their lives, then please explain, among
other m steries a Where one would find the rave of Rizal ? and b Wh are
there no Japanese visitors to the Shrine for Tomoyuki Yamashita ?
In following pages we try to re-visit published history, with a view to bringing a
clear understanding of the role that each played in the mysterious forces which
acted to promote the Philippines we know today.
Page 1
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
APX 350
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Again, what is not published, but is widely known within the "establishment" of
England, is that Queen Victoria was one of twins, and had a brother.
That boy was, in all probability, autistic, a condition little understood at the
material time, and the Courtiers decided that he was unsuitable to be raised in
precincts of the Court, and while every facility possible was placed at his
disposal, he was kept separated from the Court, and educated privately.
Badge of the North Borneo Company.
Note the Lion of Scotland and the name McLeod
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
APX 351
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
Page 3
APX 352
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
With his fame spreading, Rizal went to Japan to perform an operation on the
eyes of the Emperor, and once again, a daliance with a Japanese noblewoman, the Pri ncess Keiko, produced a male child.
The Ten no himself wrote to Rizal and warranted that he would educate the boy
in the very best schools, and so the second son of Jose Rizal would attend the
finest colleges in England, and ultimately become the highest ranking General
in the Imperial Japanese Army, General Tomoyuki Yamashita.
Meanwhile, the first son of Rizal was at the Jesuit school in Cebu, and saw his
father only at those fleeting times that he was able to make a visit.
It is considered that the reported situation of Rizal's exile in Dapitan, being
sentenced to death, and executed by firing squad in Bayumbayan, (now Rizal
Park, Manila), is indeed extraordinary, highly improbable, questionable, and in
view of the value of his surgical prowess, beyond reason.
How could a man, known as an idol and hero to Philippines, friend of Kings and
Emperors, highly intelligent and speaking twelve languages, be ordered killed
by the much hated Friars, and shot by twenty-one Guardia Civil, his
countrymen, in Manila in 1896 ?
If we look back one hundred years to that incident,
we should also look to the famous "Battle of
Manila Bay", beautifully painted, and depicted in
many written words and monuments, but which
never took place. The Spanish ships had
surrendered before the cannons of the American
ships were unleashed to fire in the air. It is
reported that one American died in his cabin of a
heart-attack.
In that context, we pose again a question
mentioned in opening paragraphs of this essay :-
Page 4
APX 353
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
That loan by Banco Espanoi-Filipino was repaid within one year, and a further
annotation to the OCT No. T-01-4 demonstrated the means by which the
money was assembled. "Quote".
Entry No. EDC 073-s-2-6 1898, Real Estate Mortgage amountng to US dollar
20,000,000 secured by this land Title T -01-04, embracing the area of
Hacienda Mabiga, Pampanga, Kuliat and Capaz, Tarlac to Banco EspanoiFilipino has been cancelled, and this released forever of Real Estate
Mortgage has been executed by the bank in favour of the owner wth the full
payment of said principal loan and an interest of US dollars 2,200,000, the
payment of which has broken as follows : General Miguel Malvar
correspondingly acquired the area of Tanuan, Batangas and had paid the
amount of U.S. dollars 3,300,000, Don Servillano Aquino acquired he whole
area of Bamban and Capaz, Tarlac, and correspondingly paid U.S. dollars
3,300,000. General Antonio Luna acquired the whole San Miguel, Tarlac and
La Paz, Tarlac and he paid U.S. dollars 2,000,000, the land was given as a
gift to his girlfriend Miss Luisita Cojuangco. Don Mariano Tayag acquired
the area of Kuliat and Mabiga, 1,500 hectares (Pampanga) and paid U.S.
dollars 3,300,000. Don Francisco Macabulos acquired the area of Sta
lgnacia, Tarlac and paid U.S. dollars 2,400,000. Don Juan Ejercito acquired
absolutely the San Juan Del Monte Hacienda embracing up to Sitio
Mandaluyong consisting an area of 3,154 hectares and had corespondingly
paid U.S. dollars 3,300,000., and Don Esteban Benitez Tallano (Tagean)
maintained his rights, being the owner over the unacquired estate, and had
paid the balance of 6,600,000 U.S. dollars. Date of Inscription February 7,
1898. (Signed) Benito Legarda, Ad Interim Land Registrar. "End Quote".
Page 5
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
APX 354
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Thus, whoever is buried at Muntinlupa, south of Manila, that body is NOT the
body of General Yamashita. We do not speculate on the escape, whereabouts
or post-war activities of General Yamashita, but our hypothesis that he was not
the victim of the gallows designed to despatch him, is reinforced by the fact
that NO Japanese national pays homage at the Shrine to General Yamashita,
for the very good reason that every Japanese national KNOWS that his
surrender was impossible, and that some undefined politically inspired
pantomine has played havoc in obscuring the true course of events.
There are rumours that during his time at the English
universities, that Yamashita became the lover of lady
Elizabeth Bowes-Lyons, a beautiful debutante, which
liasion continued after her marriage to Albert, the then
Duke of York. As the fates ordained, Albert, a sickly
man, who never expected to become King, was thrust
into that position as King George VI, when his elder
brother Edward VIII abdicated the throne in order to
wed his paramour, the twice divorced Mrs. Wallace
Simpson. The remarkable aspect of the affair between
rfi!III\ Jrr..rl"""la. ....
Yamashita and Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyons, if it has
substance, is that the present Queen Elizabeth II could
well be a daughter of General Yamashita, and
therefore, a grand-daughter of Jose Antonio Rizal..
So let us now summarise what we have constructed from a more pragmatic
view of the stated history of the Philippines, at least in terms of reviewing
impact on what has been referred to as "The hidden wealth of Marcos".
Jose Rizal is the father of two further important figures in world history,
with those figures being the German Fuhrer Adolf Hitler, and the
Japanese General Tomoyuki Yamashita.
As the son of Prince Julian McLeod Tallano, Rizal (now as Rev. Father.
Jose Antonio Diaz), was entrusted wth the relocation and management
of the massive wealth of the Tallano Clan, and perhaps the fused assets
of his British relatives ..
Thus the movement of 600,000 metric tonnes of gold from the Vatican to
Manila to facilitate establishment of the first Central Bank of the
Philippines. (Recall that the Tallano Clan were the principal land-owners
of the Philippines, as evidenced by the ORIGINAL land title OCT No. T-
01-4).
A-1 00-030-Q-00 1.
Page 6
APX 355
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
The Rev. Fr., Jose Antonio Diaz recognised the brilliance of Ferdinand
Marcos, and appointed him as counsei to aii activities of Diaz relative to
storage, safe-keeping and employment of the wealth of his father's Clan,
that of the Clan Tallano.
It is well known that Hitler had sent his treasure ships of looted gold and
valuables to Egypt for safe storage, but when Field Marshall Montgomery
defeated Field Marshall Irwin von Rommel in the North Africa campaign,
he had no option other than to redirect those ships toward Japan, his last
remaining ally.
Fate again intervened, when the United States dropped atomic bombs on
the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thus hastening the Japanese
surrrender, and causing Hitler to redirect his treasure ships to the
Philippines.
With the end of World War II, and recognition that the Japanese under
Prince Chichibu had stored massive looted wealth in the Philippines,
Rizal, in his role as Rev. Fr. Jose Antonio Diaz, had little difficulty in
identifying valuable burial sites, as he could elicit information directly
from his son, General Tomoyuki Yamashita.
Equally, he would have sound information from his first born son, Adolf
Hitler, as to location of the Nazi loot. (Hitler did not commit suicide in the
Berlin bunker as popularly accepted, but left Templehof Airport in Berlin
via a 109 Messerschmitt, and flown to neutral Spain, where he came
under protection of General Franco. Later, he returned to the Cebu of his
youth, and ended his life in the Philippines).
Thus, the recovery from several sites which yielded massive quantities of
gold bullion, precious stones and other valuables.
Does all of the above sound a little too far-fetched to attract ready acceptance
as probable ? Does it defy acceptance ? Then let us examine a few aspects
and compare those aspects with the historical record.
If there was no subterfuge in the "Battle of Manila Bay", then why was the
considerable sum of U.S. Twenty million paid by the victor to the loser of
that supposed "war"?
While the Americans took credit in the Treaty of Paris for settling the sum
of U.S. Twenty million in favour of the Spanish, we have demonstrated
via notations on Land Deeds that the money was actually paid by
Philippine land-owners.
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
Page 7
APX 356
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
"That the gold bullion lent by the Royal Family to the Republic of the
Philippines, consisting of 650,000 metric tonnes now, through
Reverend Father Jose Antonio Diaz by arrangement of the brilliant
lawyer Attorney Ferdinand E. Marcos in the year 1949, for the
establishment of the required gold reserves of the newly installed
Central Bank of the Philippines, should be maintained in the Central
Bank vaults toward maintenance of the country's gold reerves, and
the same shall be withdrawable fifty years thereafter, with five years
moratorium".
Further at page 21 :
That the said 640,000 metric tonnes of gold nuggets transported by
then surviving son of Prince Julian Mcleod Tallano from the Vatican
after the World War, in the person of Reverend Father Jose Antonio
Diaz, trustee of the Royal Family, and client of then Attorney
Ferdinand E. Marcos deserves a just compensation for no less than
30 /o of the total value of the said 640,000 metric tonnes. "End Quote".
The above LRC Civil Case 3957-R is final and executory, the law of the
land, and unfortunately, under temporary injunction following an urgent
motion for Annulment of Judgment filed by the former Solicitor General
Simeon Marcelo, in July, 2002, at instruction of President Gloria
Macapagal Arroyo. (Case CA-GR SP No. 70014, based on "alleged
nullity of proceedings".)
Could it be that the intention of the oligarchs is permanent injunction, so
that the gold can either be stolen, or diverted to a purpose never
intended by those who provided the means for the Philippines to
establish its own Central Bank ?
Certainly there is no apparent justice for the true owners of the gold, and
one might well ask- Why does the Administration wait thirty years to
bring a case for "nullity of proceedings", when the matter was
resolved by the Courts, and made final and executory on 4
February, 1972?
Repeating - Why would an Administration wait thirty years to challenge a
matter which was judicially determined, and enforceable at law ? Has
corruption so permanently entered the mainstream of government that
they seek to change history to cover both misfeasance and malfeasance
during their tenure ? Only time will tell, but it is clear that the Court has
not been expedient in dealing with the case filed in July, 2002, and so it
could be a strategy to allow the matter to lay undecided for an indefinitie
period, and perhaps beyond the life span of legitimate claimants.
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
Page 8
APX 357
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
is in
Or perhaps even of PERICLES, who, in 430 BC said :Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn't mean
politics won't take an interest in you.
So, now that we have made a brief journey through historical events which
shaped the nation known as the Republic of the Philippines, we can reflect on
what we have learned, and endeavour to speculate as to what motivated
President Marcos and Reverend Father Jose Antonio Diaz to join forces in
accumulating and placing massive wealth.
His initial meeting with Reverend Father Jose Antonio Diaz must have
been a revelation, because his legal brain would rapidly recognise that
he was in presence of a man who represented wealth, royalty, power and
influence, and just as quickly, he recognised the outgrowth of that
relationship in terms of his longer term vision for the Philippines.
In one unique area, Rev. Fr. Jose Antonio Diaz could identify wealth
concealed by the Japanese and German forces, and the legal strategies
of President Marcos could provide the domicile and protection for that
Page 9
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
APX 358
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
It was no easy task. Any recovery from a burial site would contain assets
subject of the Statute of Limitations, and if fully disclosed would attract
multiple claimants. Marcos played his role masterfully by dealing astutely
with the financial "hyenas" who habitually prey upon such assets, and
several arrangements with the Pentagon, United Nations, International
Monetary Fund and other august bodies preserved the assets through
permitting their use by the scavengers, but retaining title to the involved
principal.
Deposits with banks were largely made under "bailment" conditions, thus
assuring their security until such time as the Statute of Limitations
lapsed.
Finally the assignments were made, wherein the beneficiary was fully
identified by name. Originals of such assignments were handed
exclusively to the chosen beneficiary, with copy to the concerned holding
institution, to thus assure a trouble-free assumption of the accounts by
the beneficiary at maturity.
The question is easily answered if one has followed the ebb and flow of power
and influence on the global financial scene over the past one hundred years.
In the first instance, Prince Julian Mcleod Tallano controlled not only his own
fortune and business income, but had an interest in the fortune of his British
family, and acquired the wealth of his wife the Princess Tahata upon marriage.
A-1 00-030-Q-00 1.
Page 10
APX 359
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
And the wealth of his British family ? Fabulous. The Kings and Queens of
c .... ,...I ....... ..J ................. ..J .......w.... l.............. ly .&....... ..,.. ............. r-- .........,.. ........ ............ :.:.................................................................. ......
a11u
u1 a
11 1a1
11 VIII
1 IIUUIIILY, diiU Ll n::y, llll uuy11 ldiiU
L..ll~
vv~ ~
~~~
lll~
\.:J~IIIIc:U
ownership via conquest, had amassed major fortunes, the majority of which was
in gold.
Moreover, in the immediate post World War II aftermath, those Kings and
Queens were well aware of the chilly winds of Republicanism blowing through
their domains, and having lost both land and fortunes to the fates of war, had
turned to the church as depository of their remaining wealth in order to gain the
patronage of that august influence. The prevailing thought was, where safer to
park your fortune than with the richest influence on earth, and therefore
trustworthy and beyond venality ?
They neglected to consider that the Rothschild banking family had taken control
of the Vatican finances in 1863, and that while they were nominally protected by
the "Vatican", their wealth was at disposal of the Rothschild family of bankers.
England, least feared the winds of
Republicanism due to an arrangement
struck with the government when Britain
became bankrupt following a major
Sovereign Debt Default, which involved the
then Monarch paying all of the debts of the
country in exchange for permanent
recognition of the existing Monarchy, plus a
stipend to perform that role, and had, with
connivance of the church, formed that one
square mile of land now known as the "City
of London" to handle the financial affairs of the "crown".
In that same context, it must be noted that Britain is owned "lock, stock and
barrel" by the Vatican due to breach of Treaty considerations surrounding
Magna Carta. The Queen, although the nominal head of the Church of England,
is instructed directly by the Roman Pontiff. That condition has been "in place"
since Magna Carta, and will remain whilever the prevailing Treaties remain in
existence.
So, if Prince Julian Mcleod Tallan had proposed to his British relatives that
600,000 metric tonnes of gold should be loaned for purpose of funding a new
Central Bank in the Philippines, who would object ?
The City of London, with its close ties to the Bank of England had long
recognised that a Central Bank was a prolific revenue earner, based
upon the issue of credits as opposed to assignment of existing specie.
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
Page 11
APX 360
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
The Vatican itself would not object, since the gold was destined for use
of a dominently Catholic community.
Voila ! Prince Julian Mcleod Tallano would clearly have little difficulty in raising
the requisite 600,000 metric tonnes of gold, even if he did not have access to
that volume from his personal resources, or Muslim family affiliations.
In all truth, there were even more powerful under-currents at work long before
the period in which Prince Julian Mcleod Tallano assembled the 600,000
metric tonnes of gold. The centuries old fight for supremacy and world
hegemony between the British and Spanish crowns was in full force and effect,
and there were religious interests seeking to extend their influence in the form
of Islam approaching from the south, and the Catholic Church, as motivator of
Spain obliged them to approach the Philippines with a Bible in one hand, and a
sword in the other.
The British proved to be diplomatically superior in their efforts, as evidenced by
production of the Decree known as the 01-4 Protocol.
In 1764, the Royal Crown of England, Great Britain, decided case No. 571 in
the Escribania de Cabildo and ordered the creation of the Hacienda of the
Philippine Islands pursuant to the Decree of 01-4 Protocol, by virtue of the
Supreme Order of the Royal Crown of England embracing four major islands
consisting of 169,972,500 hectares of plains, mountains, forests, and seas,
specifically the island of Luzon 31,804,624 hectares, the islands of Palawan
3,652,875 hectares, Visayan Islands 45,996,215 hectares, and Mindanao with
83,518,786 hectares more or less. "Witness His Highness King George Ill of
the Royal Crown of England, January 17, 1764, issued at Manila at 10.45 a.m.
attested by Governor General Downsone Drake, British Governor, P.I., signed
Governor Jose Raon, Office of the Escribania de Cabildo, Proprietary
Governor."
Clever was it not ? The land mass became the property of the Tallano Clan,
and when the Treaty of Paris was executed in 1898, the victor was obliged to
recognise the Tallano Clan as true title holders to the land mass of the
Philippines. The British had protected their interests in South-East Asia in a
daring move which had assigned the land to "one of their own", the family of
Prince Julian Mcleod Tallano, brother of Queen Victoria, thus defeating all
efforts of the Spanish to retain possession of the archipelago.
And so we can repeat that Prince Julian Mcleod Tallano would have
experienced no difficulty whatever in assembling the 600,000 metric tonnes of
gold, because it all stayed "in the family".
It would be a valid assumption to suggest that Britain held the dominant
position from date of issue of the Decree of 01-4 protocol. The Spanish were in
possession of the Philippine Islands but lost their colonial powers to the USA.
The Spanish tried to maintain a foot-hold with their invalid "Titulo de
Propriedad" in the name of Hermogenes Rodriguez, and with many Spanish
land titles coming from "Friars land" as if the Friars were the original owners of
land in the Philippines.
Page 12
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
APX3761
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
The Friars were not, and never were, original land owners. The owners of the
land are indisputably the Royai Family of the Philippines, the Tallano-Tagean
Clan, originally in the name of Prince Lacan Acuna Tallano (Tagean).
In order to appreciate the intrinsic value of gold at the time of deposit to Central
Bank of the Philippines, it must be recalled that gold was then regularly traded
at between 27 and 30 dollars per troy ounce, and NOT the one thousand
dollars plus figure we note today. Even allowing a then price of USD 1,000,000
per metric tonne, the value of the deposit at date of completion would have
been in the order of USD Six hundred billion.
Today of course, that value is in excess of Thirty trillion dollars, but the loan
was a bailment which established the credit-worthiness of the new Central
Bank, and so the appreciated value is of no concern, because the contract
calls simply for return of the original deposit as gold, plus agreed interest.
The key question is - Will it ever happen ?
Note the words of Albert Einstein : "The world is a dangerous place to live ;
not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't
do anything about if'.
The currently undecided Case CA-GR SP No. 70014, based on "alleged nullity
of proceedings", lays on the Court table, unheard, at eight years after its filing
in 2002.
The intention of the oligarchs is unclear, but it is certainly unprecedented for an
administration to challenge the law of the land by seeking to overturn a ruling
which became executory some thirty years prior to challenge.
We should not leave this essay without some
further explanation of the activities and role of
Reverend Father Jose Antonio Diaz I Jose Rizal
in the momentous events which have so
markedly impacted Philippine history.
It can be shown that the Reverend Father was
not a passive participant in the looting and
reallocation of the gold and treasure of Europe
and Asia, but took an active role in its movement
and processing.
His
academic
achievements
are
well
documented in multiple publications, but here
we are far more interested in his activities
relative to looted treasure.
Little is officially known or recorded about a certain Jose Antonio Diaz de Ia
Paz who became Papal Nuncio and was invited to be the new Pope in
February 1922. He declined. He had more important things to do. He was
chosen by the Royal Families to be the trustee for all the gold left by the Royal
Families (they had entrusted him already with their eyes, and so they could as
readily entrust him their gold) which was now lying secretly in the Vatican's
Page 13
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
APX362
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
caverns in Benevento, Italy. Jose Antonio Diaz (formerly Jose P. Rizal) decided
he would bring all the gold to the Philippines. Nobody would look for it there.
It did not last long. There seemed to be a build-up for another war. The former
owners of the gold got nervous, Pope Pius XI got old. All the while Hitler's SS
silently and secretly ransacked the far-away bonded warehouses of the British
banks and brought the gold (more often than not in submarines) to Singapore
where it was delivered and handed over in brief ceremonies to the Japanese
Imperial Army under Hitler's half-brother Tomiyuki Yamashita. The submarines
headed back, so that nobody would discover the subterfuge. Jose Antonio Diaz
shipped the 650,000 metric tonnes back to the Vatican, with the quip -. "If that
is what you want !" Note : 10 years later Pope Pius XII asked him to bring it
back to Manila (see Agana Decision)
There were no telecommunications in the form we understand today but we
can imagine that Jose Antonio Diaz (or Jose P. Rizal), Adolf Hitler, and
Tomoyuki Yamashita knew what they were doing.
They were the original axis powers established during the Berlin Olympics
(where Japan's Emperor Hirohito visited Hitler), formalised with Italy in the
1940 Tripartite Pact. They did the planning and they plundered the gold, Hitler
in the West, Japanese forces in the East.
They came together and met in Singapore, which was then officially a British
crown colony, and had the smelting of the gold done by the expert _German
company, DEGUSSA. From there, the gold was brought to the Philippines to
be buried under supervision of Prince Chichibu, and to become known as the
infamous "Yamashita treasure".
We are talking of a time prior to the start of VVWII, generally accepted as being
September 1, 1939 when Hitler ordered his generals to take Poland in one day.
We could argue that the start of VVWII was much earlier, perhaps in 1937 when
the Imperial Japanese Army raided and took China, killing more than 300,000
Chinese during one day in Nanking. That was 6 years after Japan had started
the military invasion of China in order to capture the Manchuria Province in
China's North which had all the natural resources that Japan so importantly
needed in order to support a war effort. It was also in 1931 that Japan started
to invade, albeit silently, the Philippines. Mostly civil engineers in disguise, the
Japanese started to build a wide array of tunnels and caves. Thus indicating
that they prepared well ahead for the burial of the gold that would come from
Europe and China.
The gold that Hitler and his Japanese allies stole from the
richest of the rich on both sides, from those who had
money enough to buy gold, stash it away in secret bank
vaults, so that they would not have to pay tax, was listed,
immediately following the war, in the International Court of
Justice (World Court) in The Hague, Holland. The total of
the missing gold was 946,000 metric tonnes, and it is still missing.
The World Court had ruled that all gold found from buried treasure in the
Philippines would, legally, belong to the Original Claimants of WWII Loot.
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
Page 14
APX363
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Until today there has not been a single claimant. The claims are listed per
country (there are 13 countries claitning), no names of persons or families are
tendered.
The Federal Reserve, the U.S. Treasury, The International
Bank for Settlement, The International Monetary Fund, and
the World Bank, are patently aware of the location of the
gold, and to them it is the same as if the gold was stashed
secretly in America.
So, Jose Protacio Rizal/ Reverend Father Jose Antonio Diaz de Ia Paz was an
active participant in concealment and masking of the stolen treasures of World
War II. Yes he was a patriot. Yes he was an accomplished and sophisticated
person. Yes, he was a friend of royalty across a broad spectrum, and to the
end he served the Philippines, as his Letter of Instruction which details what is
to be done with the accumulated wealth, demands that its primary objective be
specific projects for betterment of the Philippines.
Whether subscribing to the accuracy of published history, or influenced by the
revelations of this essay, it must be admitted that Jose Rizal was first and
foremost a patriot, even if his modus operandi was unorthodox in the extreme.
Perhaps we should silently hope that his vision is realised, along with that of
President Marcos, his accomplice in the world's most incredible seizure and
conversion of stole1 t wealtl t.
The Philippines cries out for administrative
reform.
It has a poverty index equavalent to subSahara Africa, and Land Reform, which
should be a keystone in correcting that
totally
ignored
by
all
situation
is
administrations.
Hernando de Soto in his master-piece "The
Mystery of Capital" provided a profound study
of the Land Laws of the Philippines, and
demonstrated conclusively that Land Reform
was the key element in the elimination of
poverty and awakening of the entrepreneural spirit that is the backbone of
every great nation.
In terms of infrastructure, the beneficiary known by the Code TVM-LSM666 is equally enthusiastic to share the vision of President Marcos and
Rev. Fr. Diaz to assure that the Philippines becomes the most stable and
progressive state in the Asian community.
Page 15
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
APX364
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Ergo, the three critical elements for reform in all aspects of empowerment of
the Philippines are present, in way, means and will. What then will be the
catalyst which fuses those critical elements into a national upwelling of interest
to generate a Philippines of promise ?
If one were to provide a definition of government, we can suggest that such a
definition would be :"To provide and maintain an environment in which its people may live
peacefully and prosper".
If we can accept that definition, perhaps we are obliged to look to the
administration as the catalyst which fuses the way, means and will. Let them
lead, and the people will follow in devout appreciation of the opportunity to
assume control of their own lives. Tax revenues will increase, harmony will
reign within the population, and all will be well with the world.
Where is the leader who w ill recognise the available tools, then grasp the
initiative, and lead the Philippines toward the destiny so long planned,
and so painfully delayed, by forces concerned more with their own
welfare than welfare of the country they were elected to manage with
perception and integrity ?
~ttJ.
Manila. 1 January,2011.
Page 16
A-1 00-030-Q-001.
APX365
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:l-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
10 I Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION
TO SEAL AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES
Exhibit 29
APX366
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
B~EYPLATI
WIL.L.{).!filNH.OJ'&L.LIGA~~CTICUT
914.287.6131
914.949.2700
WMULLIGAN@BPSLAW.COM
FAX: 914.683.6956
BPSLAW.COM
Re:
29,2012.
1. Plaintiffs Memorandum of Law pertaining to assertion of subject matter
jurisdiction, i.e., the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act and federal
common law, as well as the issue of subject matter jurisdiction with
respect to the defendant United Nations in the absence of a waiver of
immunity.
2. Plaintiff's response to Motion of Proposed Intervenor Christopher-Earl
Strunk.
Thank you very much.
cc:
APX367
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
wmulligan@bpslaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Plaintiff,
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL
-against-
APX368
ECFCASE
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
TAKE NOTICE that Neil F. Keenan, plaintiff, dismisses this action without prejudice
pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(l)(A)(i) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Dated: White Plains, New York
June 27, 2012
By:
w~~f!:n.1.'(b,9:f
Attorneys for Plaintiff
One North Lexington A venue
White Plains, New York 10601
Tel. No. (914) 949-2700
Fax No. (914) 683-6956
www. bpslaw.com
APX369
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
INVOICE
ID # 13-2775946
500 Pearl St
Room 330
INVOICE NO.
0251796-IN
INVOICE DATE
06/06/2012
CUSTOMER NO.
1000217
121487
SALESPERSON
Siwik, Christine
Job Date
5/30/2012
KEENAN V BOSCO
CASE NO. 11 CV08500
Original
28
PGES
At
3.120
87.36
Net Invoice:
87.36
0.00
0.00
0.00
87.36
Less Discount:
Freight:
Sales Tax:
APX370
Invoice Total:
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
......
----------------~-------------X
Plaintiff,
6
11
v.
cv asoo
(JMF)
7
DANIELE DAL BOSCO, et al.,
8
Defendants.
9
10
------------------------------x
11
12
'
Befol;'e:
HON. JESSE M. FlJRMAN I
13
District Judge
14
APPEARANCES
15
17
18
16
. Proposed Intervenor
19
20
21
22
23
24
,;
.,
'
25
APX371
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSU'l'MEC
DEPUTY CLERK:
Civ. 8500.
MR. MULLIGAN:
THE COURT:
MR. STR'IJNK:
St~,
10
11
12
Court.
I'm
I'm a
13
THE COURT:
14
16
unusual one.
17
18
MR.
19
20
I have
revie~ed
15
MuLLIGAN:
THE COURT:
22
eve~
23
25
It's an
21
24
the complaint..
MR. MULLIGAN:
APX372
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
C5UTKEEC
1
could be.
Nothing has changed since, . your Honor, in that I have
Mr. Sale is in Thailand with Defendant Dam, who was the head of
the OITC.
variety of
reaso~s.
We believe
10
after 15 months.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
And he is
I'm being as
19
~traightforward
20
jur.isdictional issues.
21
said-- I dqn't want to, for instance, serve the U.N., get a
22
timetable'going .there.
23
24
others.
25
as I can.
(212) 805-0300
APX373
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
for that.
them.
complaint.
never had a case like this, obviously, that I was just waiting
We
10
11
doing the best I can to try to get this thing off the ground.
12
13
14
prejudice.
15
16
17
18
19
is conversion.
20
until 2013.
21
Ru~e
4(m), I would
22
23
this point was to appeal to the Court, even though it's not
24
25
805-0300
APX374
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
it.
I have read that portion of your complaint with some
10
ll
c~re,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
jurisdiction.
21
MR. MULLIGAN:
The provision of
22
23
24
25
805-0300
APX375
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
~f
Federal Reserve
not~s
billion worth
~ork,
10
11
jurisd~ction.
12
13
point.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
York.
21
22
23
24
25
SO~ERN
This is
It's
APX376
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
and official
Unit~d
inte~national
THE COURT:
MR. MULLIGAN:
financial organizations.
It acts as
This is
that
I don't have it, but I'm being as straight as I can with you,
10
Judge.
11
12
1~
14
If you
15
16
tell you I'm not -- sitting here and without doing any
17
research, I can't tell you I'm inclined to think that the fact
18
19
20
note."
21
22
23
was involved.
24
2$
I will
Cash, I
MR. MULLIGAN:
unexpected.
(212) 805-0300
APX377
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
THE COURT:
MR. MUL~IGAN:
Please.
I realize I may have a few more upon
10
t~e
11
12
13
that.
14
both of those.
15
16
Italian officials that you named, I would say you should also
17
18
19
those parties.
Obviously you proffered two bases for it, you can .brief
I think
20
MR. MULLIGAN:
21
THE COURT:
22
~ssuming
23
24
25
....... -..,. _
APX378
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
7
8
9
10
MR. MULLIGAN:
uphill battle,
b~t
I take
It's an
u . N.
or Ban
11
pretty basic, that the United Nations itself and Ban Ki-moon
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
MR. MULLIGAN:
So there may
19
20
and certainly on the U.N.'s mind if they were served, and that
21
22
THE COURT:
23
well, but I think I will have you brief the question of whether
24
25
APX379
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
immunity.
happen ~
MR. MULLIGAN:
THE COURT:
MR. STRUNK:
~he
.I understand from
~-
well, let
10
11
12
13 .
14
15
De Chardin is
16
buried up there.
17
18
19
20
21
Reserve gold bonds, and the monies were transfer to the Federal
22
23
24
25
APX380
oss.
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
I had conversations
was aware of many of the gold transfer problems' and the fight
over where the buried gold was, and the Imelda Marcos case
w~ere
OSS
He was my Congressman.
So that I
10
11
12
court testimony.
13
14
15
bond also.
16
17
18
in the region that the theft occurred, and that I lopked at the
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
one~
by the Chinese
(212) 805-0300
APX381
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
not going to happen in that the Chinese are getting both sides
of the coin.
8
9
wa~t
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
They
th~
is
20
21
22
the use these historical bonds and related bonds. which are part
23
24
that red China should come together with Taiwan I can get paid.
25
And I'm not here to get paid, I'm just here to make sure
805-0300
APX382
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
THE COURT:
b~ck
to 1913
And I
8
9
10
11
12
from your comments now is what you have riding on this other
13
14
15
MR. STRUNK:
So to sort of simplify
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
and course the foreign bond holders counsel, which it's their
24
25
thro~gh
a two-sided platform,
APX383
And
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CS'LJTKEEC
I did serve who I thought were parties to this case with the
summons and
served who had to be given notice in any case that this was
going on _in his system, and the Italian ambassador was served
as well as Mr. Petty and the . foreign bond holders counsel and
with Bollinger.
complai~t,
10
11
12
with the Federal Reserve, now not only are they using the
13
14
15
was brought in, the red Chinese bank-is coming in to run our
16
17
the Court.
h~ve
18
THE COURT:
19
20
21
22
MR. MULLIGAN:
23
24
that since there had been no return dates set, obviously since
25
805-0300
APX384
expec~
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
that I would oppose it.
be there's
jus~
And I
thi~
THE COURT:
MR. MULLIGAN:
THE COURT:
I can't imagine
10
11
12
13
14
15
and
16
17
number one, can you just help me -- you have referenced the 120
18
19
MR.. MULLIGAN:
20
THE COURT:
21
MR. MULLIGAN:
22
and
By my account, your
23
Honor
24
says, that the 120 day rule does not apply to essentially
25
APX385
4 {j) .
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
rts in my letter.
that was under the predecessor to Rule 4(m) which said that you
that does seem to be the law in this circuit, and its been
circuits.
THE COURT:
MR. MULLIGAN:
11
12
And
10
THE COURT:
That's good.
Yes .
13
14
now I will do the best I can -- who would not be subject to the
15
16
17
18
THE COURT:
19
20
21
THE COURT:
22
MR. MULLIGAN:
23
24
THE COURT:
25
MR.. MULLIGAN:
805-0300
APX386
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1.
THE COURT:
MR. MULLIGAN:
OK.
So my eleven might be -- I have three,
THE COURT:
8
9
I consider
10
11
12
13
14
15
MR. MULLIGAN:
16
OK.
17
THE COURT:
18
MR. MULLIGAN:
19
20
21
22
23
24
Dal Bosco,
25
pres~nt
whereabouts unknown.
APX387
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
Giancarlo Bruno.
Should I
10
Ki-~oon,
11
Giancarlo Bruno.
13
position?
14
MR. MULLIGAN:
15
THE COURT :
16
MR. MULLIGAN:
OK.
I think that would be -- certainly as
17
18
19
THE COURT:
OK.
20
21
22
MR. MULLIGAN:
23
THE COURT:
24
25
805-0300
APX388
And by your
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
~SUTKEEC
than 120.
MR. MULLIGAN:
people.
8.
10
11
prejudic~,
and
would refile.
Anq . fr~nkly,
12
we
13
I did two months ago with Judge Holwell, so I could just get to
14
the bottom of this and see which way -- I admit, it's sort of a
15
hedge.
16
17
18
or not.
19
20
21
headed.
22
23 .
24
25
THE COURT:
mig~t
~hem?
Again,
APX389
have
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
C5lJ"""TKEEC
been taking a wait and see attitude to see when everything was
going forward.
THE COURT:
10
11
12
MR. MULLIGAN:
OK.
13
14
15
Court's docket for years and years and years because you're not
16
17
that defendant.
18 .
MR. MULLIGAN:
19
THE COURT:
The flip
I understand.
I would actually
ra~her
20
And to
21
extent that you can comply with that, I will allow -it to
22
proceed, and to the extent you can't, you will have to suffer
23
the consequences.
24
25
805-0300
APX390
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
I attempted to do that
in the letter.
THE COURT:
I am
don't think you have showed me good cause for failure to serve
those defendants.
10
11
12
13
that you don't want to proceed in that fashion or you can try
14
15
te~l
me
16
think -- I could ask for two weeks to try to persuade you, and
17
18
19
here.
20
do~'t
21
THE COURT:
Corre.ct .
22
23
24
total, correct?
25
MR. MULLIGAN:
SOUTHERN DISTRICT
REPOR~ERS,
(212) 805-0300
APX391
P.C.
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
THE COURT:
:MR. MULLIGAN:
THE COURT:
MR. ~ruLtiGAN:
THE COURT:
OK.
you feel that more time is necessary and require you to update
10
me
perio~ically.
11
MR. MULLIGAN:
12
THE COURT:
Hang on.
13
need, I will give you that time, and in the interim I will ask
14
15
serve.
16
diligence in doing so, so be it, I will give you the time that
17
18
19
I want you to --
20
MR. MULLIGAN:
21
THE COURT:
22
23
24
hard to locate.
25
locate.
So
Correct.
N~edless
805-0300
APX392
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
locate.
MR. MULLIGAN:
for in my letter
ra~her
THE COURT:
of 90 days
~rom
MR. MULLIGAN:
And so
discontinu.ed?
10
THE COURT:
11
12
presence.
13
14
15
different grounds.
16
17
18
U.S .A., Cesare Maria Ragaglini and Ban Ki-moon, for failure t o
19
serve within 120 days and failure to show good cause for that
20
failure.
21
22
23
24
25
MR. MULLIGAN:
SOUTHERN
REPORTERS, P.C.
805-0300
DIST~ICT
(212)
APX393
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
to make a case that you have good cause to the additional time.
appris~ng
regard.
MR. 1'1ULLIGAN:
THE COURT:
10
issues.
11
intervene .
12
13
in that
14
MR. MULLIGAN:
15
THE COURT:
16
di~igence
17
MR. MULLIGAN:
18
THE COURT:
OK.
19
By
20
June 29 he will file memorandum with the Court and serve a copy
21
on you.
22
I will
23
You can discuss with him how best to do . that, and then
giv~
24
MR. STRUNK:
25
THE COURT:
805-0~lH)
APX394
And
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
MR. MULLIGAN:
THE COURT:
.6
That's fine.
And just
s~
10
li
li
13
14
15
16
MR.. MULLIGAN:
l7
THE COURT:
18
:MR. MULLIGAN:
19
20
juri~diction
~ssue,
Yes .
21
matter
22
23
MR. MULLIGAN:
24
THE COURT:
25
Correct.
805-0300
APX395
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
1
abso~~te
Court of jurisdiction.
MR. MULLIGAN:
THE COURT:
OK.
som~
things.
page
limit~
and
10
give you the same 20 pages to respond, and I think that's all I
11
12
MR. MULLIGAN:
13
MR. STRUNK:
14
THE COURT:
15
MR. STRUNK:
16
OK.
Your Honor, is that single or double?
Double spaced.
All right.
discussed single.
No, ! prefer double spaced, sir.
17
THE COURT:
18
19
20
21
service.
22
23
the 90 days.
24
but just our next appearance will be right after Labor Day.
25
APX396
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
unles~
you to appear
MR. MULLIGAN:
your Honor.
complaint,
10
will advise
understand?
11
THE COURT:
12
13
14
15
You're welcome to
I don't
16
MR. MULLIGAN:
17
THE
18
I':ffi.. MULLI<;3AN:
19
THE COURT:
20
COURT:
t~ink
am~nd
You
the complaint if
Understood.
by the deadline that we set.
Understood.
21-
MR. MULLIGAN:
22
THE COURT:
Understood, Judge.
23
the five defendants who are present in this country back into
24
25
APX397
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CSUTKEEC
brings them back in it, don't assume you can wait to serve
haven't located.
OK?
MR. MULLIGAN:
THE COURT:
Anything
10
MR. MULLIGAN:
11
THE COURT:
12
MR. STRUNK:
13
THE COURT:
14
Yes, sir.
fu~ther
I don 1 t
for today?
think so.
yo~
Thank you.
oOo
15
16
i7
18
19
20
21
22
23 "
24
25
APX398
In that
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Filed 05/~~~;pc:i::l==:l=====
USDCSDNY
DOCU\'IENT
----------------------------------------------------------------------){
NEIL F. KEENAN, individually and as agent for the
Dragon family, citizens offoreign states,
Plaintiff,
ELECTRO~ICALLY FILED
DOC#:
DATEF-Il_E_D_:-5~/~IS-/~,-d-r
11 Civ. 8500 (JMF)
-v-
NOTICE OF INITIAL
PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
DANIELE DAL BOSCO, et al.,
Defendants.
----------------------------------------------------------------------)(
JESSE M. FURMAN, District Judge:
PlaintiffNeil F. Keenan brings this action seeking monetary and equitable relief against
Defendants. Plaintiff filed his Complaint on November 23, 2011. Service of process has not been
effectuated upon any of the Defendants. On January 25, 2012, Christopher Earl Strunk filed a
motion to intervene as a plaintiff in this matter. By letter dated May 11 , 2012, Plaintiff Keenan
indicated to the Court that he intends to oppose this motion.
It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties and proposed intervenor Strunk appear
for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on May 30, 2012 at 3:30 p.m. in Courtroom
26A of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street,
New York, New York. All counsel are required to register promptly as filing users on ECF. All
pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial
counsel.
SO ORDERED.
APX399
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
914.949.2700
914.683.6956
BPSLAW.COM
May 11,2012
ViaE-mall
Re:
1.
I am counsel of record for plaintiff and there has been no change from the
information contained in the Docket. As service of process has not been
effectuated upon any of the defendants, no record appearances have been
filed by any other counse~ except that a motion to Intervene was filed in
early January 2012 (see further discussion under subparagraph 5).
2.
The complaint is comprised of Ill pages and the following is a good faith
effort to condense that volume into a "brief statement of the nature of the
case" in accordance with the Court's most appropriate directive. This case
asserts 12 causes of action seeking monetary and equitable relief against a
variety of international persons and/or entities, including a foreign
government (Italy) and agencies, as well as the United Nations ("UN"), the
Office of International Treasury Control ("OITC"), and the World
Economic Forum ("WEF''). The action arises initially from the
expropriation and conversion of certain negotiable financial instruments
APX400
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
APX401
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
5.
scheduled h)' the Cowt; it woaid be plaintifPs intent to oppose the motion
as we see no claimed interest by the proposed Intervenor which in any way
relates to the property or transaction which is the subject of plaintiff
Keenan's complaint, or in any way implicates the provisions of Rule 24.
The foregoing is stated with all due respect to the merits of such
independent claims propounded by Mr. Strunk.
6.
7.
8.
9.
It would be very difficult at this juncture to estimate the length of any trial.
10.
We believe this case presents novel factual issues and has potentially
enonnous national and international economic repercussions. We also
represent that the decision to date not to have formally served the
complaint has been conscious and deliberate and do not assert that any
meaningful effort has been undertaken to effectuate service. We submit,
however, that such decision has been made entirely in good faith for
various reasons, including without limitation, the following: (a) it became
apparent within a short time after filing this lawsuit that additional, largely
historical information, which would bolster plaintiffs claims and
repudiate certain anticipated defenses, would be forthcoming. We remain
APX402
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
In short, in light of the fact that the majority of the defendants named in
this lawsuit are foreign entities not subject to the 120 day rule, and further
in light of the fact that for the sake of judicial convenience and with a
desire to avoid piecemeal litigation with widely disparate times to answer,
move or otherwise engage in discovery, we respectfully suggest that the
Court, in the exercise of its discretion, allow an additional 90 days to
effectuate service upon the defendants within the parameters of Rule 4
(m). We respectfully offer this suggestion as it would avoid any possible
discontinuance, albeit without prejudice, as against the United Nations,
Ban KiMmoon and WEF USA defendants (those three (3) of the defendants
who are located in New York City), and I submit, would be without
prejudice to any of the parties. Further, in light of the possibility, indeed
likelihood, of the need to amend the complaint, it would be our goal to
1 Recently the 3rd Departtnent ruled that article 10 (a) of the Hague Convention permits service of process by mail,
allowing the plaintiff in that case to serve Canadian defendants pursuant to the appJicable Vehicle and Traffic Law.
By its Decision, the 3rd Dept. shifted course and joined with precedent established in the Second and Fourth
Departments. The decision noted a similar division among federal circuit courts of appeal, and adopted the
reasoning of the Second Circuit. NYS Thruway Authority v. Fenech, 938 N.Y.S. 2d 654, 656 (3rd Dept., 2012).
APX403
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
APX404
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CHJUSTOPHEREARLSTRUNK
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 NYC, NY 11238
845-901-6767 chris@strunk.ws,
and H. WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
351 North Road Hurley NY 12443
845-389-4366 hvanallen@hvc.rr.com
Plaintiffs,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
101 Independence A venue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION
TO SEAL AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES
Exhibit 30
APX405
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Plaintiffs,
NOTICE OF MOTION
v.
TO SEAL AND
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOHN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
101 Independence Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
ERIC HOLDER, US ATTORNEY GENERAL
950 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington DC 20530
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the am1exed affidavit of Christopher-Earl: Strunk
affirmed November 8. 2014 with exhibits will move with Fed Rules of Civil Procedure and
Local Rules to Seal the Case and
until further notice as supplement to the Motion Reargue the Order to Dismiss entered June 16,
2014 in order to Supplement the Complaint filed 10 June 2014 with Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule
15(a)(1)(A), and Rule 19(a)(1)(A)(B), heard before the Honorable Richard J. Leon USDJ at the
APX406
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
/sf
Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris
secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust
transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL
STRUNK Plaintiff, the Executor and Settlor
for the Express Deed In Trust To The United
States O[America, located at
593 Vanderbilt Avenue- PMB 281
Brooklyn, New York Zipcode excepted 11238
Cell: 845-901-6767 Email: chris@strunk.ws
SERVICE LIST:
PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL FOR RECIPIENT EYES ONLY with COURTESY COPY
REDACTED MOTION WITHOUT EXHIBITS TO RECIPIENT:
US Attorney for
Washington District of Columbia
Judiciary Center Building
555 Fourth Street NW
Washington DC 20530
JOSHUA PEPPER, AAG for
Eric Schneiderman, Attorney General for
The State ofNew York
120 Broadway 25th Floor
New York, New York 10271
H. William Van Allen
351 North Road
Hurley, New York 12443
MICHAEL SHRIMPTON
8 Jusons Glebe,
Wendover, United Kingdom HP22 6PF
APX407
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CEUUSTOPHEREARLSTRUNK
593 Vanderbilt Avenue PMB 281 NYC, NY 11238
845-901-6767 chris@strunk.ws,
and H. WILLIAM VAN ALLEN
351 North Road Hurley NY 12443
845-389-4366 hvanallen@hvc.rr.com
Plaintiffs,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE (DOS) by
JOl-IN F. KERRY (SOS) at 2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520 TTY:1-800-877-8339
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
by JOHN 0. BRENNAN, DCI
Washington, D.C. 20505 fax: (571) 204-3800
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW Washington DC 20500 :
U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE
I 01 Independence Avenue SE
Washington, DC 20559-6000 (202) 707-3000
and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD
OF ELECTIONS and its agents at
40 North Pearl Street, Suite 5
Albany, NY 12207-2729 Fax (518) 486-4068
Defendants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
PLAINTIFF STRUNK AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF THE NOTICE OF MOTION TO
SEAL AND
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF KINGS
)
) ss.
)
Accordingly, I, Christopher Earl Strunk, being duly sworn, depose and say under penalty of perjury:
APX408
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
I. Movant is Christopher-Earl: Strunk in esse Sui juris secured beneficiary agent of the Debtor Trust
transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK Plaintiff, the Executor and Settlor for the
Express Deed In Trust To The United States O[America under 12 USC 95 with 50 USC App. 5(b)
and related Law for Martial due process of law herein (Affiant), and with service located at 593
Vanderbilt Avenue- PMB 281 Brooklyn, New York Zipcode excepted 11238 Cell: 845-901-6767
Email: chris@strunk.ws
2. That Affiant affirms this affidavit in support of his motion for the Court Order to Seal this case and
Order ofthe
That Affiant wishes to comply with the Order to Distniss entered on June 16, 2014 with the demand
that the Complaint having been filed requires a more "simple, concise, and direct" definite statement
in keeping with Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 8(d)(1) and to include all essential parties-in-interest with
Supplemental Plaintiff MICHAEL SHRIMPTON with Christopher Earl Strunk in esse Sui juris
secured beneficiary agent for debtor trust transmitting utility CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
Plaintiff(STRUNK), and Harold William Van Allen in esse surety-indenture for debtor trust H.
WILLIAM VAN ALLEN Plaintiff (VAN ALLEN), hereinafter known as the Petitioners, that bring
this Complaint with Petition for a writ of mandamus and preliminary injunction for hearing the facts
of the complaint for equity relief under 28 USC 2201 and 2202, and it being alleged that there is a
matter of malicious infringement of fundamental rights of the posterity of private citizens of the
United States that inter alia under color of law is a diversity matter by interference with a contract and
APX409
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
judicial process; that with such wrongful acts of perjury, spoliation, concealment, intimidation,
forgery, use of false instruments, aiding and abetting the enemy while under a state of war or national
emergency, is misprision of felony, misprision of treason and treason per se done individually and or
jointly by the Captioned and supplemental Defendants: RANDOM HOUSE, LLC., PENGUIN
RANDOM HOUSE FOUNDATION, INC. and MICHAEL GREAVES as to entities RANDOM
HOUSE, INC. and THE NEW YORK TIMES BOOK CO., INC. (aka TIMES BOOKS INC");
ACTON, DYSTEL, LEONE & JAFFE, INC.; and JANE D. DYSTEL, individually and severally.
5.
That on or about July '6, 2014, my Expert Witness Paul Edward lrey corresponded w i t h -
documents and
records of supplemental Defendants.
7.
8.
That Mr. SHRIMPTON had solely intended to testify as an expert witness as to facts and direct
experience related to the ineligibility of Defendant BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II to the Office of
President of the United States (POTUS); remains willing to testify exclusively- will do so, and
especially now in light of the matters raised in the trial on his exposure of terrorist matters involving
the 2012 London Olympics that starts in London on Monday 9 Nov 2014 will raise issues involving
the US Intelligence agencies ofproofofthe illegitimacy ofBarrack Hussein Obama II as POTUS.
9. That on September 11, 2014, Affiant appeared with his Expert Witness Paul Edward lrey in the New
APX410
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
York Supreme Court for the County of Kings in the matter of the Petition Strunk v. Jeffries eta/. with
Index No.: 21948-2012 with a Note of Issue ready for trail before the Honorable Justice David I.
Schmidt J.S.C. with a trial exhibit presentation board shown as Exhibit 23; and the Court rescheduled
the Non-Jury pre-Trial hearing for November 24, 2014 and directed Affiant to serve all parties and
with the proviso that were the other side not to appear the Court would itself conduct an inquest (see
Exhibit 24); that Mr. Irey remains able and willing to testify
10. After the September 11, 2014 scheduled appearance with
11. That on October 30, 2014, as a head-up regarding the scheduled October 31,2014 Non-jury Trial
appearance in 21948-12 that was to firmed up for November 24,2014 shown in Exhibit 2 4 , -
APX411
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
APX 412
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
APX 413
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
14. The
----
--
--
-------
------------ ---------
------
--
APX 414
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
18. My FOIA case before Your Honor 08-cv-2234 disclosed the usurper's Javanese name
"SOEBARKAH" that as it turns out is associated with a CIA instigated Indonesian SUBUD cult in
which He and Loretta Fuddy are/were prominent leader under George H.W. Bush's watch at CIA.
19. That according to George HW Bush in his "One World Order" term used in his 1992 State of the
Union speech to Congress, the crowning glory ofthe election of William Jefferson Clinton in 1992 is
implementation ofNAFTA (HW said he could not have done better than Clinton), and then with the
George W. Bush Administration implementation of CAFTA, the last of three trade agreements looms
with BUSH IV, Barack Hussein Obama II the Indonesian prince, and now HW Bush's "One World
Order" trade agreement in his grasp to nail our coffin shut--- The Trans-Pacific Partnership {TPP).
20. Since August of2013, I am associated and collaborate with
22. Further because this is a difficult subject I include an historical summary (see Exhibit 2 8 ) -
23. Further, that since the murder of JFK followed signatures on the Green Hilton Agreement with then
Indonesian President Sukarno on November 12 1963, occupied me through the early 1990's when my
HUD project in Brooklyn first met with the office of Stephen A. Solarz, then a US House member,
APX 415
~trunk
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
my curiosity was fed thereafter when he left the House, worked full time on Pacific Asia affairs, and
from 2000 we had several phone discussions regarding gerrymandering per se related to my case
before Judge Gershon in USDC EDNY 99-cv-2168, and about his role as a member of the Trilateral
Commission to capture the trust created by Fernando Marcos & Fr. Jose Antonio Diaz S.J.
24. In 2005 I was hired to study the theft of more than Ten Million Dollars from the ex wife of the
Director of the Culinary Institute of America and to attempt to recover the funds; and in the process I
studied the fraud conducted by the New York Province for the Society of Jesus in Dutchess County in
its purchase of zoning changes and associated vote fixing arranged by attorney Thomas Spargo for the
Pyramid I Galleria Malls organizations, and
25. Further, as part of my research, I requested that the CIA provide the files on Fr. Pierre Teilhard de
Chardin SJ (buried at the Culinary Institute), the father of the New Age Movement, "Peking Man"
and facilitatot of Mao Zedong to power in 1949, who along with his agents in US Naval Office of
Naval Intelligence transferred tons of gold from China from no less than 1935 forward and having
died in 1955 and dead for fifty-two years as a foreigner with French citizenship, I did my FOIA
request nd wanted to know what records the CIA have on De Chard in, and in response the CIA stated
it could neither admit nor deny any knowledge of any files, and after the CIA invited me to sue, and
26. Further, with written permission by the CIA, I filed the case Strunk v United States Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA), Scott Koch, also added United States Department of State (DOS),
Condoleezza Rice, United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Michael Chertoff, United
States Department of Justice (DOJ), Michael Mukasey, New York Province of the Society of Jesus
and Fr. Gerald Chojnacki, SJ in USDC EDNY 07cvll96 (ARR) to Judge Ross's chagrin.
27. My further efforts to study
Family Case, associated with De Chardin gold transfers, Keenan v Dal Bosco et a/11 cv 8500 in
USDC SDNY before Judge Jessie M. Ferman with a transcript and related order, see Exhibit 29 .
APX 416
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff wishes the Court to grant this motion to Seal this Case along
with the Motion before your Honor to reargue the Order to dismiss and that essential
parties to this instant action be added, along with the additional transactions being
germane herein for justice to be done, and that the changes to the caption of the
Supplement as to existing defendants be incorporated into the court record for the
issuance of additional summons to each defendants for a preliminary hearing scheduled
by the court along with subpoenas and to ORDER
June 16, 2014 to supplement with the First Supplement to the Complaint with additional exhibits herewith
attached and I know its contents; the facts stated are true to my own personal knowledge, except as to the
matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters I believe it to be
true. The grounds of my beliefs as to all matters not stated upon information and belief are as follows:
3rd
parties, books and records, and personal knowledge. except as to those stated upon information and belief,
which I believe to be true.
IS/
Christopher Earl Strunk
Subscribed and Sworn to before me
This gTH day ofNovember 2014
IS/
Notary Public
APX 417
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Strunk et at. v US DOS et al USDC DC 14-cv-00995 (RJL)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this lOth day November, 2014, I caused a true and correct
copy of the Plaintiff STRUNK's REDACTED ---NOTICE OF MOTION TO SEAL
AND PROTECT MATERIAL WITNESSES with Supporting affidavit affirmed 1108-2014 without Exhibits annexed to be served upon Defendants and or their Counsel
by first class United States Postal Service mail postage prepaid marked for delivery to:
MICHAELSHRIMPTON
The Honorable Jeff Sessions
United States Senator from the State of
Alabama
326 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
8 Jusons Glebe,
Wendover, United Kingdom HP22 6PF
j_tJ,
Dated: November
2014
Brooklyn New York
APX 418
Customer Service
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
USPS Mobile
~USPS.COM'
Customer Service>
USPS Tracking
On Time
Expected Delivery Day: Wednesday, November 12, 2014
Features:
USPS Tracking
Available Actions
Up to $50 insurance included
Text Updates
Restrictions Apply
Email Updates
DATE&TIME
STATUS OF ITEM
LOCATION
WASHINGTON, DC 20001
Your item was delivered to an individual at the address at 2:37 pm on November 12, 2014 in
WASHINGTON, DC 20001 .
WASHINGTON , DC 20018
WASHINGTON, DC 20066
BETHPAGE, NY 11714
BETHPAGE, NY 11714
Acceptance
BROOKLYN , NY 11201
Track It
APX 419
1
Q.
Document #1550250
.. Filed: 04/30/2015
fov~
ct-\ci\..l. slb)J
AN Q
Trip- ])1.
'7
'.Sln(c r
or::- {csLuU1.8/A
c
FILED
{2/f-S
/t-LL(SJL}
\).
s. '\)
U,
C}?f4VL'TI-U ~IT~F- st-A--rtr J oH,~ f l<t.41J 1L/
('~f[l'LJ.r-L f tJTELLfGG"'WCE /-l-6-CS}JC.Jf { JDHAJ (),
1
---~rz l
(CYLLC
&y
lJPf""c&v ~J')rl.
.s
Ttf
.JL
JUN 10 2014
Case: 1:14-cv-00995
Assigned To : Leon, Richard J.
Assign. Date: 6/10/2014
Description: TRO/PI
bt.'r1..1 .
...
---.
( t'-JJt!'& c T
l~~t
eL
rer-11'0---(
Iff"~ :kt:1..111-1tiiiAIL1
~~ Fu(Ll1-181"LE&J( r-l[ R;u
'f'o
e-r
rR<:if
rtVJUtVC"{lCJtv /.lr:J4R.JtvG#
) (?- (2-
LVCrN- A- (!:,.'lp
(.J
p Tt-1,11
IV 0
/~ J.t1 d
PfL(:{[ C"'L( f ;v-f4t-uy JN' )~ N C. 77 CJ I\.) 1-k:-'};4 f"l.../ tv(,;_. fV t'l ~vi ~ ~...-{_ lt5f:- d f=-u) <:. -z z. ~ 4: - u ?_ A tJ f.-1 ~ t:rJ 4t:)'l.r;:ro .tv \rn Ptz-c r_o sf:1J oJQ {) lfl1_ .
A-ND
'2_ "?S
C)
(]2_~L4~7
\,.
:...---
t./A~'DL1l'Ll'?
~ll--r 4- \l&:--
pn,{? ex>I
lJ
APX 420
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
D
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
----------------------------------------------------------------x
<=ase ~o.:
v.
U.S.
DEPARTME~T
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
DECLARATION OF PLAINTIFF CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
IN SUPPORT OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WITH MANDAMUS OF
DEFENDANTS TO HONOR THE SUBPOENA OF MICHAEL SHRIMPTON AND
PAUL EDWARD IREY TO TESTIFY AT PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING
FOR FURTHER EQUITY RELIEF
I, Christopher Earl Strunk agent for <=HRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK (Plaintiff) and
Executor for the Express Deed in Trust to the United States ofAmerica hereby subscribe and
declare under penalty of perjury with 28 US<= 1746:
That I am a co-plaintiff and have conferred with H. William Van Allen and we both agree
as to the necessity for relief with this request for expedited relief in conjunction with the
~Vrit
Relief of28 USC 2201 and 2202 with verification affirmed 9 June 2014 annexed in support
herewith.
APX 421
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
And accordingly at the Hearing Mr. IREY, also an expert in his field, will testify to the
matters sworn to in his Affidavit on file with the Note of Issue Filed with the New York States
Supreme Court for the County of Kings Strunk v Jefferies et al. Index 21948-2012 as to his
forensic analysis of the two (2) purported Birth Certificates proffered by BARRACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II during 2008 before that General Election and then a new supposed long form birth
certificate on or about April 25, 2011, an that both are proven forgeries and that the third analysis
is that of the forged supposed copyright certification of the book "Dreams From My Father"
published in 1995 with the advertising for 16 years that the Author BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II was born in Kenya now on the forged document alleges birth in Hawaii.; and that
APX 422
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Mr. IREY will prove at the Hearing on or about 18 June 2014 that all three documents were
created by the same forger.
That in the States Cases with Indexes 29642-2008, 21948-2012 there has never been any
testimony and that the Judge Sclunidt acts in comity with his fellow Judge Arthur M. Schack is
reluctant to either sign subpoenas or grant a certain date at trial, and as he outrageously sits on
the case for no less than five years eight month for the 2008 case and two year for the 2012 case,
when warned of gross negligence Judge Schmidt, other State Justices and two Governors goes to
the Federal Statute for treason and misprision of treason for which they have been duly notified
are frozen at the switch when given judicial notice that Federal statutes accordingly are, quote:
18 U.S. Code 2381 -Treason
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to
their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is
guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years
and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding
any office under the United States.
18 U.S. Code 2382 - Misprision of treason
(Pub. L. 113-86, except 113-79.)
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the
commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be,
disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United
States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of
misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than
seven years, or both. (emphasis by Petitioner) (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807; Pub.
L. 103-322, title XXXIII, 330016(1)(H),Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 18, U.S. C., 1940 ed., 3 (Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, 3,35 Stat. 1088).
Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in the alternative.
Amendments 1994-Pub. L. 103-322substituted "fined under this title" for "fined not
more than $1, 000".
18 U.S. Code 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection
Current through Pub. L. 113-86, except 113-79.
APX 423
3
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against
the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall
be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
18 U.S. Code 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force
the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force
the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of
the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States
contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned
not more than twenty years, or both.
18 U.S. Code 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government
Current through Pub. L. 113-86, except 113-79.
Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity,
desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United
tates or e governmen o any a e, err1 ory, 1s ric or osse si n
government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the
assassination of any officer of any such government; or
Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government,
prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any
written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity,
desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United
States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or
Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of
persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such
government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any
such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereofShall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and
shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency
thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.
If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be
ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for
the five years next following his conviction.
As used in this section, the terms "organizes" and "organize", with respect to any
society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the
forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and
other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.
APX 424
4
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Therefore with two experts that will settle the matters of who the poseur POTUS need to
be given a forum to testify as this evidence has not be taken anywhere yet for effect and use.
Therefor Plaintiff urges this court as time is of the essence with imminent irreparable
harm urges this Court issues a mandamus with order for a preliminary injunction hearing on June
18, 2014 and that the order state as follows:
LET the DEFENDANTS, the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOHN F. KERRY,
APX 425
5
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
to produce all records in the matter of its website with qualification to run for President or Vice
President of the United States in the General Election cycle of2008, 2012.
4. of the State of New York with supplemental jurisdiction to produce any records under
its control at the New York State Higher Education Service Corporation or related agency for the
student by the name Barry Soetoro, Barack Hussein Obama, Steven Dunham, Barry Allen
Owens, Barry Obama and or any combination of that set of name. for student attendance at
Columbia University from the period 1979 thru 1984.
5. Trial on the facts to be joined after the preliminary hearing;
6. Granting such other and further relief as to the court may seem just and equitable.
ORDER that pending the hearing and determination of this instant action that the clerk of
this Court shall issue a Subpoena of PAUL EDWARD IREY to appear at the preliminary hearing
on 18 June 2014, , and that all Defendants herein and their agents, especially the US Department
of State and their agents the direction of the U.S. Attorney General and or his representatives
shall honor this order and Subpoena for the purpose to testify; and to
ORDER that service of a copy of this order to show cause and the papers upon which it
was made upon the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOHN F. KERRY,
APX 426
6
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
3rd
APX 427
7
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Case No.:
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOHN F. KERRY,
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, JOHN 0
BRENNAN, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II,
U.S. COPYRIGH~ OFFICE, and THE NEW YORK
.,~rrcJM
STATE BOARD y Its a~nts .
Defendants.
ERIC HOLDER, US ATTORNEY GENERAL
ERIC SCHNEIDERMAN NYS ATTY GENERAL
-----------------------------------------------------------------X
Upon the annexed affidavit of Christopher Earl Strunk agent, dated June 10, 2014, and
the papers annexed thereto,
9:30 o'clock in the forenoon of that date or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, vvhy an
order should not be made and entered:
1. ofthe CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and Director JOHN 0. BRENNAN to
release the " DNA" test results of BARACK HUSSEIN OBANIA II and subsequent analysis done
APX 428
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
between 2007 to 2008 and alleged by MICHAEL SHRIMPTON is now in its possession.
2. of the UNITED STATES COPYRIGHT OFFICE to produce all records associated
with and the certification of the original copyright and or amendments for the book "Dreams
From My Father" published in 1995 covering the period of 1995 thru 2014.
3. of BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA II to produce actual duly certified proof that he was
actually born within the United States of U.S. Citizen Parents.
4. of the NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ELECTION under supplemental jurisdiction
to produce all records in the matter of its website with qualification to run for President or Vice
President of the United States in the General Election cycle of2008, 2012.
4. of the State of New York vvith supplemental jurisdiction to produce any records under
its control at the New York State Higher Education Service Corporation or related agency for the
student by the name Barry Soetoro, Barack Hussein Obama, Steven Dunham, Barry Allen
Owens, Barry Obama and or any combination of that set of name. for student attendance at
Columbia University from the period 1979 thn1 1984.
5. Trial on the facts to be joined after the preliminary hearing;
6. Granting such other and further relief as to the court may seem just and equitable.
SUFFICIENT CAUSE THEREFOR APPEARING, it is
ORDERED that pending the hearing and determination of this instant action that the
clerk of this Court shall issue a Subpoena of MICHAEL SHRIMPTON to appear at the
preliminary hearing on
June 2014, and that all Defendants herein and their agents,
especially the U.S. Department of State and their agents at the Direction of the US Attorney
General and or his representatives shall honor this order and Subpoena for the purpose of entry
into the United States to testify.
APX 429
Document #1550250
- ------------
Filed: 04/30/2015
ORDERED that pending the hearing and determination of this instant action that the
clerk of this Court shall issue a Subpoena of PAUL EDWARD IREY to appear at the
preliminary hearing on _ _ _ _ June 2014, , and that all Defendants herein and their agents,
especially the US Department of State and their agents the direction of the U.S. Attorney General
and or his representatives shall honor this order and Subpoena for the purpose to testify.
ORDERED that service of a copy of this order to show cause and the papers upon which
it was made upon the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, JOHN F. KERRY,
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, JOHN 0. BRENNAN, BARACK HUSSEIN
OBAMA II, U.S. COPYRIGHT OFFICE, and THE NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF
ELECTIONS along with ERIC HOLDER, US ATTORNEY GENERAL and ERIC
SCHNEIDERMAN NYS ATTORNEY GENERAL by _
,2014
USDJ
APX 430
4127/2015
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Subject: CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE#: 1:14-cv-00995-RJL SlRUNK et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARlMENTOF
STATE et al
From:
To:
CEStrunck@yahoo.com;
Date:
APPEAL,CLOSED,JURY,PROSE-NP,TYPE-D
Plaintiff
Plaintiff
APX 431
1ttps://us-rrg S.mail.yahoo.com'neollaunch?.rand= 7i6ac1 a45ask1#4296572395
1/4
4127/2015
v.
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Defendant
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF STATE
Defendant
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
AGENCY
Defendant
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II
Defendant
U.S. COPYRIGHf OFFICE
Defendant
NEWYORKSTATEBOARD OF
ELECI'IONS
Defendant
Date Filed
. 06/10/2014
Docket Text
06/10/2014
06/10/2014
06/1012014
106/16/2014
https://us-rrg5.mail.yahoo.com'neollaunch?.rand=7i6ac1a45ask1#4296572395
214
4/27/2015
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
Mandamus atxi 2 Mofun fur Preliminary Iqj~tiln Hearing are DENIED~ and it is
further ordered that tm plaintiflS' comp1aint mDISMISSED. sp by Juige !Whard
J.leonon06/13/14. (tb:J) Modified on6/16/2014 (tb, ). (Entered: 06/16/2014)
06/16/2014
06/30/2014
07/10/2014
11/10/2014
MINU'IE ORDER denying .6. Motion to Reargue tre Order to Dimliss and
SuppJement the Complairt. It ii hereby ORDERED that 1m rmtiln is DENIFD.
Signed by Judge ~hard J. Leon on 11/10/14. (lcrj12~) (Entered: ll/10fl014)
. 12/03/2014
B. USCA ORD~ ORDERED that 1m m>tDn fur leave to proceed in :fOrma paupem
be granted; FUR1IIER ORDERED that tlE Imttln to comoB:Iate be der1Ed;
FUR1IIER ORDERED that 1he petition fur a writ ofiDWXlatm.5 be deni!d. USCA
Nmnber 14-5191. (ml,) (Entered: 12/11!2014)
12/10/2014
12/12/2014
12/29/2014
01/23/2015
USCA Case Ntmber 14-5327 :fOr 2 Noti:e ofAppeal filed by HAROlD W. VAN
ALLEN, CHRISIDPHER.EARL S'IRUNK. (rd) (Entered: 12/30/l014)
tps://us-rrYJ5.mail.yahoo.com'neollaunch?.rand=7i6ac1a45ask1#4296572395
APX 433
412712015
0112912015
Document #1550250
Filed: 04/30/2015
01/30fl015
01/30/2015
VAN
AU.EN) Moti>n fur Leave to Proceed on Appeal In Forma Pauperis [Dkt. # 11] is
GRANTED. Signed by Judge }U}hard J. I..eonon01/30/2015. (jth) (Fntmed:
01/30fl015)
01/3012015
02/02fl015
--
03/04/2015
M1NUIE ORDER denying 1 Motion :tbr Jwicial N o1Ee. It !I rereby ORDERED that
pJaintifiS' Mofun is DENIED as MOOT. Sig~Ed by Juige Ri:hard J. Leon on
3/412015. (lcrjl2,) (Entered: 03/04/2015)
03/04/2015
APX 434
https://us-mJ5.mail .yahoo.com'neollaunch?.rand=7i6ac1a45ask1#4296572395
414