Jefferson to John Holmes Regarding

the Missouri Compromise

Monticello Apr. 22. 20.
I thank you, Dear Sir, for the copy you have been so kind as to send me of the letter to
your constituents on the Missouri question. it is a perfect justification to them. I had for a
long time ceased to read the newspapers or pay any attention to public affairs, confident
they were in good hands, and content to be a passenger in our bark to the shore from
which I am not distant. but this momentous question, like a fire bell in the night,
awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the knell of the Union. it is
hushed indeed for the moment. but this is a reprieve only, not a final sentence. a
geographical line, coinciding with a marked principle, moral and political, once concieved
and held up to the angry passions of men, will never be obliterated; and every new
irritation will mark it deeper and deeper. I can say with conscious truth that there is not a
man on earth who would sacrifice more than I would, to relieve us from this heavy
reproach, in any practicable way. the cession of that kind of property, for so it is
misnamed, is a bagatelle which would not cost me in a second thought, if, in that way, a
general emancipation and expatriation could be effected: and, gradually, and with due
sacrifices, I think it might be. but, as it is, we have the wolf by the ear, and we can
neither hold him, nor safely let him go. justice is in one scale, and self-preservation in the
other. of one thing I am certain, that as the passage of slaves from one state to another
would not make a slave of a single human being who would not be so without it, so their
diffusion over a greater surface would make them individually happier and proportionally
facilitate the accomplishment of their emancipation, by dividing the burthen on a greater
number of co-adjutors. an abstinence too from this act of power would remove the
jealousy excited by the undertaking of Congress, to regulate the condition of the different
descriptions of men composing a state. this certainly is the exclusive right of every state,
which nothing in the constitution has taken from them and given to the general
government. could congress, for example say that the Non-freemen of Connecticut, shall
be freemen, or that they shall not emigrate into any other state?
I regret that I am now to die in the belief that the useless sacrifice of themselves, by the
generation of $76. to acquire self government and happiness to their country, is to be
thrown away by the unwise and unworthy passions of their sons, and that my only
consolation is to be that I live not to weep over it. if they would but dispassionately weigh
the blessings they will throw away against an abstract principle more likely to be effected
by union than by scission, they would pause before they would perpetrate this act of
suicide on themselves and of treason against the hopes of the world.
to yourself as the faithful advocate of union I tender the offering of my high esteem and
respect. Th. Jefferson